A5 Well Examination Rev 1 PDF

Drilling Management System
OPERATING COMPANY NAME
Well Engineering & Drilling Operations

Well Examination
Rev No: Date Description Compilation Reviewer
QC & SIGN-OFF
Functional Unit Name Signature Date
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
Page 1 of 52 document property
name.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Introduction
While Operating Company’s wells are a significant asset they are also a significant potential
liability.
To ensure that Operating Company’s wells’ risks are as low as reasonably practicable all company
wells’ designs, their drilling plans and operations are examined by a competent independent well
engineer referred to as a Well Examiner. While this may be a regulatory requirement in some
countries Operating Company have adopted the practice to ensure that all well drilling and
completion operations
Although Operating Company ensures it employs competent drilling engineers and supervisors, it is
the Project Drilling Manager who ensures this initially as he is accountable to Operating Company
for the well designs, plans and operations. However, the potential impact of well or drilling failure
is so significant Operating Company apply two further mitigations to identify and correct any
omissions or errors;
• Operating Company’s Drilling Technical Authority (who is independent of both the project
team and asset) reviews all well designs and plans and receives all Daily Drilling Reports
(DDRs). The close proximity provides early response and reaction.
• Furthermore Operating Company engages a competent industry authority to examine its
well designs, plans and operations. As this external verification is independent of the
project, asset and Operating Company’s well engineering and operations function it
reassures both company and industry regulators about the reliability of Operating
Company’s wells and drilling operations.
The Well Examiner applies a standard methodology sometimes referred to as a “Written Scheme of
Verification” and qualifies the design or plans. NB: As operator Operating Company retains liability
for the well, its design and plans, consequently the examination does not certify the well, its
designs or plan.
At the instruction of Operating Company Ltd Well Examination may also be implemented in the
Company’s well operations conducted in locations other than the UKCS.
Regulation 18 of the UK’s Design and Construction Regulations requires well operators to have a
written scheme of examination (referred to as the "Arrangements for Examination" in the
regulations), to ensure that wells are “designed, commissioned, constructed, equipped, operated,
maintained, suspended and abandoned so that as far as is reasonably practical there can be no
unplanned escape of fluids from the well and that the risk to the health and safety of persons from
it, anything in it, or in the strata to which it is, are as low as reasonably practicable”.
It is a requirement of the DCR regulations that well examination shall be undertaken by an
Independent and Competent person who is sufficiently knowledgeable and separate from the
immediate well operators line management.
The Operating Company scheme of Well Examination employs risk based principles allowing the
independent Well Examiner to use his/her skills, experience and knowledge to vary the degree of
examination required during well design, well construction and well operations to ensure that the
appropriate measures have been employed to reduce risks to as low as reasonably practicable
(ALARP) levels.
Reasonably practicable is a narrower term than "physically possible" and implies a computation
must be made in which the quantum of risk is placed on one scale and the sacrifice whether in
money, time or trouble involved in the measures necessary to avert the risk is placed in the
other. If it can be shown that there is a gross disproportion between them and that the risk is
insignificant in relation to the sacrifice, then Operating Company Energy as the duty holder
discharges the burden of proving that compliance was not reasonably practicable.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
In addition to fulfilling Operating Company Energy requirements to comply with the DCR
regulations the Scheme offers the following additional benefits:
• It provides data for peer reviews and audit processes;
• It can be used by Joint Operating Partners to review and monitor the performance of
Operating Company Energy;
• It provides quality assurance of well related regulatory submissions; and
• It allows technical review by input from an experienced well engineer.
The Arrangements for Examination shall be subject to periodic review and revised as appropriate.
A presentation illustrating the main features and operation of the Operating Company Ltd Scheme
of Well Examination is available for the induction new staff by following the attached link.
All activities highlighted in bold using the word “shall“ are considered to be mandatory.
Participants
Senior Drilling Engineer
Drilling Engineer
Completion Engineer
Subsea Engineer
Drilling Superintendent
Drilling Supervisor
Drilling Project Manager
Head of HSE Ops
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
2.0 Well examination process

2.1. General
The objective of the well examination scheme is to provide the necessary assurance to Operating
Company Ltd that all wells for which it is the nominated well operator are adequately designed,
constructed, maintained and operated throughout their lifecycle.
The scheme shall clearly demonstrate that
• the pressure boundary or envelope of a well is monitored and managed throughout its life
cycle; and
• any pressure containment equipment that forms part of the well is suitable for its purpose.
Details of the examination scheme and sufficient well examination records shall be kept to form an
auditable trail. These shall record
• what aspects have been examined;
• when the examination was performed;
• how the findings and recommendations were communicated to the Well Engineering
Teams; and
• what changes were implemented as a result.
Where a well is associated with a platform there may be an overlap between the well examination
scheme and the verification scheme of an installation. The nature of this relationship is depicted in
Appendix 1 Figure 1.
Roles and responsibilities of the main personnel involved in well examination and the verification
scheme of an installation are detailed on the RACI chart depicted in Appendix 1 Figure 2 and are
outlined as follows:
Well Examiner
• runs the well examination scheme;
• performs the actual examination work;
• when requested by Operating Company Ltd participates in HAZID and HAZOP activities
associated with well programming activities;
• compiles End of Operation's Reports (see Appendix 2 for examples of Well Examination Sheets
produced) and maintains the scheme’s records;
• delivers reports to the QHSE Manager
• is an independent and competent person;
• has a minimum experience level of 10 years well engineering and/or operational well design
and construction experience;
• has provided documented evidence of competency;
• is supplied by an independent external contractor, and reports to the QHSE Manager thus
providing independence from the Operations Teams (see Appendix 1 Figure 1); and
• is not involved in the well operation being examined in any other capacity.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
The well examiner is responsible for

• the continuing examination of the well pressure containing envelope of both subsea and
platform wells in accordance with the Operating Company Ltd Scheme of Well
Examination. This will include all associated materials and equipment contained within
and upon the well.
• the regular review of well activities to ensure that wells are designed, constructed,
equipped, maintained and operated with their safe operating envelope.
• The regular review of any well related dispensations relating to well integrity permitting
the continued operation of both platform and subsea wells.
Note: For subsea wells this includes well equipment upstream of and including the
production wing valve including all wellhead, tree valve and SCSSVs but does not
include subsea flowlines.
Examination activities will include:
• Review of wellhead, tree valve and SCSSV integrity test records to check that function and
pressure tests are being performed to the appropriate Operating Company Energy policies
and to the appropriate performance standards.
• Ensure any follow up actions arising from failure to meet the performance standards are
properly closed out.
• Check that regular ROV inspections are being performed as specified by the appropriate
Operating Company Energy policies and to the appropriate performance standards.
• Review of well related reports.
Offshore Supervisor
• is responsible for ensuring that the well operation is performed as specified in the programme;
and
• ensures that adequate data is included in the Daily Operations Report to allow completion of
the Construction Examination Sheet.
Drilling Engineer
• provides the data (design documentation, Daily Drilling Reports etc) to the Well Examiner to
enable the examination of the design and construction phases to be carried out;
• provides responses to any queries raised and to any formal Comment Sheets issued by Well
Examiner; and
• informs the Well Examiner of any changes to the programme, and/or dispensations from policy
that might be issued.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Manager Well Operations

For all well activities shall:-
• provide the data (design documentation, Daily Operations Reports etc) to the Well Examiner to
enable the examination of the design and construction phases to be carried out;
• inform the Well Examiner of any changes to the programme, and/or dispensations from policy
that might be issued.
• brief the Offshore Supervisor about the well examination scheme;
• provide the Offshore Supervisor with a Construction Summary Sheet prior to the work so that
he/she knows what information must be included in the Daily Operations Report;
• be responsible for ensuring timely responses to any Comment Sheets issued by the Well
Examiner;
• be responsible for the day to day management of the Well Examiner;
• ensure that all well examination documentation is correctly forwarded to the appropriate
personnel as defined in Appendix 1 Figures 2, 3 and 4; and
• ensure that all well examination documentation is correctly filed in accordance with DCR
Regulation 18 (4).
• maintain a listing of UKCS wells for which Operating Company Ltd Limited is accountable and is
to be regarded as persuasive in other regimes which have no specific regulatory requirements
for well consent/verficataion. This listing shall be constantly updated to reflect changes to well
status or additions and deletions to the listing arising from new well suspension, old well
abandonments, acquisitions, trades and relinquishments;
It should be noted that liabilities for abandoned and suspended wells remain the responsibility of
the licence holder.
QHSE Manager
• provides a reporting point for the Well Examiner which is independent of the operations line;
• resolves any disagreements between the Well Examiner and the Well Operations Team by
involving the Managing Director to mediate any final decision.;
• is responsible for ensuring that End of Operations reports are filed in a clearly identified and
secure location; and
• ensures the HSE is informed of the location at which the well examination records are kept.
All Personnel involved in the Scheme
Periodic Well Examination review meetings shall be held as required to allow all those involved in
the scheme (as depicted in Figures 1-6 Appendix 1) to propose, discuss, and implement any
changes deemed necessary.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
2.2. Design phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN APPENDIX

1 FIGURE 4)
The Well Examiner shall examine the well design to ensure that it complies with Operating
Company Ltd policies and procedures and that it enables well integrity to be maintained during the
construction and operation phases of the well. In performing this examination the Well Examiner
shall require access to various documents such as: -
• Well proposal or basis of design;
• Rig Move Procedures;
• Installation Operations Safety Case(s) (and Combined Operations Safety Case(s) - if
applicable);
• Shipping Survey (if applicable);
• Casing Design Document;
• Details of offset data used;
• HSE Notification;
• Material changes to HSE Notification;
• Site Survey and Shallow Hazard Assessment;
• Well Programme and Amendments if applicable;
• Minutes of any risk assessment, HAZID, or pre-operational meetings;
• Expected well operating parameters;
• DTI Application to Drill (PON 4/WONS submission);
• DTI Application for workover/intervention (PON8/WONS submission);
• Dispensations from policy;
• Handover certificates; and
• DTI Application to abandon/suspend (PON5/WONS submission).
A Well Design Examination Sheet shall be completed to provide an auditable record of the
examination.
If the Well Examiner has any queries or concerns that are not answered in a timely manner to
his/her satisfaction by verbal or e-mail communication then a formal Comment Sheet (see example
shown in Figure 14 Appendix 2) shall be issued to the Manager Well Operations whose Team is
responsible for the design.
The Manager Well Operations issued with the formal Comment Sheet shall respond to the
concerns raised by completing the relevant section of the form and return it to the Well Examiner
within an appropriate timeframe.
The Well Examiner shall maintain a register of all e-mail correspondence exchanged and any
formal Comment Sheets issued and closed out.
In cases of dispute where the comments from the Well Examiner are not accepted and there is a
‘failure to agree’, the Well Examiner shall raise the matter with the QHSE Manager who will
involve the Managing Director to mediate any final decision.
Copies of any amendments to the work programme shall be sent to the Well Examiner for review
and details entered on the Design Examination Sheet. The Design Examination Sheet will
consequently remain open until the well operation is completed.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
2.3. Construction phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

APPENDIX 1 FIGURE 5)
After examining the well design the Well Examiner shall produce a Construction Examination
Sheet, which details, in the form of a checklist, the safety critical operations, which will be
performed during the well construction process.
As the well progresses the Well Examiner shall complete the checklist to confirm that the well has
been constructed according to the design, or, if not, what action has been taken to maintain well
integrity.
During the Construction Phase the Well Examiner shall require access to certain documents, such
as: -
• Activity Reports (e.g. Daily Drilling Reports, Casing and Cementing Reports, Perforating
reports, BOP test reports etc.);
• Copies of completed Handover Certificates;
• Final Well Schematic;
• Final Wellhead Schematic, if applicable;
• Seabed Clearance Certificate;
• OIR9B Reports - if applicable (well integrity related only); and
As with the Design Phase, the Well Examiner will engage in verbal or e-mail communication and
can issue formal Comment Sheets if there are any comments or queries during the Construction
Phase.
2.4. Workover phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

APPENDIX 1 FIGURE 4 & 5)
The examination of workovers shall be performed using a similar process as already described for
drilling operations. However, routine operations from a fixed platform, which require the removal
of Xmas tree swab cap, (e.g. PLT or similar survey) do not need to be formally examined for each
entry. Where such operations are carried out under standard procedures, the Well Examiner shall
examine these procedures on a one-off basis.
Operating Company Energy shall supply hard copies of such standard procedures to the Well
Examiner for examination. Once examined the Well Examiner will confirm in writing that they have
been examined and they should be entered onto the list of documents in Appendix 3.
Well operations from a fixed platform, which need neither DTI consent nor HSE notification and do
not require removal of pressure containing well components, do not require examination.
2.5. Operational phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

The DCR requires a well examination scheme to be in place throughout the entire life cycle of each
well, including the operational (i.e. production/injection) phase. Examination of such wells shall
entail an initial examination of the well's operating and maintenance procedures, and regular
monitoring of data provided in operational reports (e.g. annulus pressures, DHSV and tree valve
testing records, maintenance records etc.).
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
2.6. Suspension phase (SEE FLOW CHART OF PROCESS IN

Should it be necessary to temporarily suspend an operational well, then the suspension process
shall be examined in a similar manner to that used for a workover operation as described above.
Should a new well be suspended this shall be examined as part of the drilling examination.
Where wells are suspended for extended periods of time then it shall be necessary to examine
how these wells are maintained and monitored.
2.7. Abandonment phase

When it becomes necessary to permanently abandon a well, the abandonment process shall
require examination. As with suspension, if this is an operational well, then the abandonment
shall be examined in a similar manner to that used for a workover operation as described above.
Should a decision be made to permanently abandon a new well, the abandonment shall be
examined as part of the drilling examination.
Once a well is permanently abandoned it is no longer necessary to maintain or monitor the well
and it is no longer necessary for the well to be covered by the Well Examination Scheme.
It should be noted that liabilities for abandoned and suspended wells remain the responsibility of
the licence holder.
2.8. End of well examination report (SEE EXAMPLES IN

APPENDIX 2)
After the well operation is finished the Well Examiner shall produce an End of Well Operation
Examination Report, which shall be the formal Operating Company Ltd auditable record to
demonstrate examination of the design and construction of the well.
This report shall comprise, as a minimum:-
• copies of the completed Design and Construction Summary Sheets;
• supporting documentation;
• closed out Comment Sheets;
• copies of any dispensations from policy issued; and
• a register of all e-mail correspondence exchanged.
The Well Examiner shall send the end of operation report to the QHSE Manager for sign off and
formal filing thereby completing the Well Examination process for the well operation in question.
Operating Company Ltd shall retain the completed End of Operation Well Examination Report
(including all examination and comments/query sheets and other supporting correspondence) in
compliance with DCR Regulation 18 (4).
2.9 Bi annual integrity report (SEE EXAMPLE IN FIGURE 13

APPENDIX 2)
Every two years (bi-annually) the Well Examiner shall produce a well integrity review sheet for
each well for which Operating Company Ltd is the nominated well operator. This shall be copied
to the well owner and any issues associated with continued well integrity clearly identified. If a well
integrity issue is identified the well owner shall respond to the well examiner with details of the
remedial action planned and the proposed timetable for implementation.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
2.10 Scheme review

The agreed processes for Well Examination shall be subject to periodic review as required.
The purpose of the review shall be to
• confirm the proper working of the examination scheme;
• identify areas where it could be improved;
• review comments raised during well examinations to identify any trends in the type of
deficiencies found, so that any remedial action can be put in place; and
• review planned and actual changes to the various policies, procedures , codes and
standards as listed in Appendix 3 to determine whether any changes are required.
Records of meetings held to review the scheme shall be written up by the Well Examiner and
retained on file by Operating Company Ltd. These records shall document any agreed actions, the
parties responsible for completing the action and subsequent close out.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
3.0 Operating company responsibilities under the scheme

Operating Company shall provide the Well Examiner with an up to date listing of the various
policies, procedures, codes, and standards that it has formally approved to control well and well
related activities. This listing defined in Appendix 3 shall form the document set that will be used
as a basis for the well examination. Operating Company Ltd shall provide the Well Examiner with
copies or access to copies of Operating Company Ltd policies and procedures.
Operating Company Ltd shall ensure that the Well Examiner is updated when there are changes
made to this listing or any of the documents listed.
These policies, procedures, codes, and standards include (but are not limited too):
- Well Construction Policy & Procedures;
- Casing Design Policy & Procedures;
- Well Barrier Policy & Procedures;
- Well Control Policy and Procedures;
- Well Operation and Maintenance Procedures;
- Well Integrity Policy and Standards; and
- API, NACE, UKOOA, IP, and other Industry Codes of Practice and
Standards.
The various policies, procedures, codes, and standards that Operating Company Ltd has formally
approved shall be applied to all stages of well design, construction, operation, and maintenance.
If, at any time, this does not occur then a properly authorised dispensation shall be issued and
copied to the Well Examiner.
During the planning phase of the well, Operating Company Ltd shall ensure all reasonable steps to
obtain predictions of the subsurface environment, which can be expected in the well from offset
well data. Where such information is limited Operating Company Ltd shall identify potential worst
case conditions, and shall identify all potential hazards and circumstances likely to lead to unsafe
well conditions. This shall include not only formations which may pose a hazard directly but also
those which may affect the ability to control a hazardous situation e.g. loss zones, shallow gas,
H2S, stuck pipe, over pressured zones, plastic formations etc. For such circumstances mitigating
actions shall be put into place for each hazard identified.
During well design it shall be the responsibility of the person(s) planning the well to ensure that
selection of materials shall be made on the basis of their fitness for use in the downhole
environment and loading conditions likely to be experienced during drilling, completion, workover,
suspension and abandonment activities.
Only Contractors with an acceptable capability and competency with installations and equipment
meeting the appropriate safety standards shall carry out construction of wells. Such work shall
be carried out under the supervision of a Operating Company Ltd wellsite representative and all
stages of construction and commissioning shall be fully reported to the Operating Company Ltd
Manager Well Operations and monitored/reviewed against the previously agreed well plan.
Information returned from the wellsite during construction of the well shall be used to assess
actual conditions against those parameters used in the design and deviations notified to the Well
Examiner. In order to facilitate well examination the Offshore Supervisor shall ensure that all the
necessary data on the items critical to well integrity, which are listed in the Construction Sheet, are
included in the Daily Operations Reports.
Any problems, programme changes or differences between planned and actual operations, which
may impact on well integrity, shall be highlighted to the Well Examiner by the Manager Well
Operations either via the Examination Construction Sheet or by agreed channels of communication.
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
If the well plan has to be amended for any reason it shall be done using Operating Company Ltd's
approved management of change procedures.
All equipment used in Operating Company Ltd wells during construction, intervention and
operational activities shall be fit for its intended purpose and shall comply with Operating
Company Ltd approved specifications listed in Appendix 3 and meet appropriate industry
standards. Prior to commencement of any well operation Operating Company Ltd shall have
confirmed with the Installation Owner that safety critical items of equipment available on the
installation (e.g. blow-out preventers, choke manifolds, degassing equipment, wireline lubricators)
are suitable for the pressures and flow rates expected during the well operation.
Wells shall be operated in accordance with the appropriate Operating Company Ltd documented
procedures. All controls necessary for the safe operation of a well shall be in place and fully
functioning or the necessary dispensations in place. Tree valves and sub-surface safety valves
shall be cycled and tested at a frequency established from risk and reliability data in line with
Operating Company Ltd approved procedures to ensure that they meet the desired performance
standard.
Well design shall always take into consideration the need for future suspension or abandonment.
The design shall be such that suspension or abandonment can be completed in a safe manner in
accordance Operating Company Ltd approved policies and that there shall be no unplanned
escapes of fluids thereafter.
The "Arrangements for Examination" and all well examination records shall be kept at the
Operating Company Energy Edinburgh Office, which is at the following address:
50 Lothian Road
Edinburgh
EH3 9BY
4.0 APPENDIX 1: Process charts

Figure 1: Diagram depicting the overlap between the Well Examination scheme and
the Verification Scheme on an Installation
Figure 2: RACI Chart detailing the main roles and responsibilities of personnel
involved in Well Examination and the Verification Scheme of an Installation
Figure 3: Organizational structure showing independence of the Well Examiner
Figure 4: Arrangements for Well Examination - Design
Figure 5: Arrangements for Well Examination - Construction
Figure 6: Arrangements for Well Examination - Well Integrity during production and
suspension
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Figure 1: Diagram depicting the overlap between the Well

Examination Scheme and the Verification Scheme of an
Installation
Swab Production
Valve Wing Valve
Upper
Master
Valve
Lower
Master A Annulus A Annulus
A Annulus A Annulus
Valve GLMV GLWV
MOV2 MOV1
B Annulus B Annulus B Annulus

MOV3 MOV1 MOV2
C Annulus C Annulus
MOV1 MOV2
Subsurface
Subsurface Safety
Well Construction and SCE Verified against

Integrity reviewed by Well Performance Standards
Examiner specified in Company
Verification Scheme by IVB
Dual Role (Well Integrity) Verification performed by IVB

performed by both IVB during manufacture
and Well Examiner
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Figure 2: RACI chart detailing the main roles and

responsibilities of personnel involved in Well Examination
and the Verification Scheme of an Installation
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Senergy Limited Well Integrity - Responsiblities (RACI) Chart.
Element Task
Offshore Onshore Others
Producing,
Injecting and
Suspended
Offshore Supervisor Production

Well Integrity
Wellhead Original Equipment

Health and Safety Executive
Drilling Operations Manager
Well Service Supervisor
Platform Engineer
Drilling Engineer
QHSE Manager
Well Examiner
Manufacturers
OIM
DTI
IVB
Set Integrity Performance Standards C R C A I C C C C I
Verification of all platform safety critical
I R A I I R
equipment.
Verification/Inspection of manufacture
I I C R
of safety critical well components
Physical verification/Inspection of
I I A I I I R
safety critical well components
Examination of pressure containing
I I A I R
envelope of platform and subsea wells
Record Well Data A R I I
Bleed down annulus A R I I
Integrity Test Platform Xmas Tree
A R R R R I R I
Valves
Test Platform Xmas Tree ESD System A R I I I
Integrity Test Platform Well SSSV A R R R I I
Test Platform Well SSSV ESD System A R I I
Report Data Collected A R R I I I R I

Review Well Data C C A C
Identify Integrity Issue R R I A I C
Agree Remedial Action R C C A C C I C
Inform Well Examiner of change in well
A I R I
status
Inform HSE of change in well status R A R I
Prepare Work programme I I C A C R C C
Acquire any Dispensations Required C C C A I C I I
Submit to Well Examiner for Review A R I

Submit necessary well notifications and
A R R I I I
applications for consent
Responsible R Does the work

Acountable A Answerable for action/inaction ("the buck stops here")
Consulted C Consulted/Active Role
Informed I Kept informed/passive (supporting) role
Director
Group Technical Engineering & Operations
Well Examination
Doc. Error!Unknown
name.
Operating Company
Principal Drilling Engineer
Project Drilling Team
Well Examiner
Figure 3: Operating Company Ltd Organisation Structure Showing

Independent Reporting Relationship of Well Examiner
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.

responds and reviews Comment
Well Design Sheet(s) with Well Examiner in a
completed by timely manner.
Well Operations
Team If necessary the design is revised
or dispute arbitrated by the
Principal Drilling Engineer
Design details Comment

reviewed by Sheet(s)
Well Examiner
Design
Conforms N Well Examiner
to completes
Standards Comment
Sheet(s)
Well Examiner
completes Design
Examination Sheet
Figure 4: Arrangements for Well Examination – Design
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Well Examiner Drilling Project Manager responds

prepares Well and reviews Comment Sheet(s) with
Examination Well Examiner in a timely manner.
Well Construction If necessary the programme is
Construction
in Progress revised or dispute arbitrated by the
Sheet from well
programme Principal Drilling Engineer
Daily Operation Reports or

Change to Programme.
Also well-related OIR/9B
reports
Comment
Sheet(s)
Construction
Sheet updated
by Well
Examiner
Examination Report
to
Capricorn Files
Well
Construction N Well Examiner
as per issues
Design Comment
Sheet(s)
Principal Drilling Well Examiner

Engineer completes
Construction
Examination Sheet
End of
Operations
Drilling Project
Examination
Manager
Report
Figure 5: Arrangements for Well Examination - Construction
Well Examination
Doc. Error!
Unknown
name.
Manager Well Operations responds

and reviews Comment Sheet(s) with
Well Monitoring Well Examiner in a timely manner.
in Progress If necessary the programme is
revised or dispute arbitrated by the
QHSE Manager
Daily Production and Well

Integrity Monitoring and
Testing Reports
Also well-related OIR/9B
reports
Comment
Sheet(s)
Well Integrity
Data Package
reviewed by
Well Examiner
Examination Report
To
Senergy Ltd Files
Well
Integrity as per N Well Examiner
performance issues
standard Comment
QHSE Manager Sheet(s)
Well Examiner
completes Well
Integrity Review
Sheet
Bi-annual
Well Manager Well
Integrity Operations
Report
Figure 6: Arrangements for Well Examination – Well

Integrity Review Production and Suspended Wells
——————————————————————————— SENERGY QHSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

5.0 APPENDIX 2: Examples of examination sheets

Note: Examination sheets are shown for illustration only. The exact content of the
Examination sheet shall depend on the specific requirements of the well to be examined.
Figure 7: Design Examination Sheets Exploration/Appraisal Well Sheets 1 to 7.
Figure 8: Construction Examination Sheets Exploration/Appraisal Well Sheets 1 to 4.
Figure 9: Design Examination Sheets Development Well Sheets 1 to 7.
Figure 10: Construction Examination Sheets Development Well Sheets 1 to 4
Figure 11: Design Examination Sheets Workovers and Well Interventions Fixed
Installations or Platforms Sheets 1 to 2
Figure 12: Construction Examination Sheets Workovers and Well Interventions Fixed
Installations or Platforms Sheet 1.
Figure 13: Design Examination Sheets Workovers and Well Interventions MODU Sheets
1 to 4.
Figure 14: Construction Examination Sheets Workovers and Well Interventions MODU
Sheet 1.
Figure 15: Well Integrity Review Sheet for Production and Suspended Wells
Figure 16: Formal Comment Sheet
——————————————————————————— SENERGY QHSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Drilling Management System Well Examination
FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS …SHEET 1 OF 6
Well Name: Installation or Rig: Date:
Document Reviewed Information Examined Information Verified Correct Date Comment Sheet
Acceptable Reviewed
or Date 1 Issued Number
Well Proposal or Basis of Design Co-ordinates Verify from maps provided

Is the well location within 200m of pipelines
or other infrastructure?
Will rig anchor spread cross pipelines or
infrastructure?
Is the well location within 125m of licence
boundary?
Licence exception/restrictions
Any collision risk issues – shipping survey
required?
Approval Any environmental conditions
Site Survey Seabed Conditions Are problems likely? – jackups, punch
through, scouring, anchoring conditions
favourable etc.
Anchoring conditions favourable?
Seabed Hazards Any hazards identified?
Shallow Gas Shallow gas identified?
Rig Move Programme Seabed and Mooring arrangements
Meteorological Hazards Weather limitations
Preloading, stomping, preloading etc
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or is the date of application, acknowledgment, consent, or expiry.
Page 22 of 52
FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 2 OF 6

Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification Application General details correct? (water depth, rig

name, well name etc.)
Date sent
Directional Programme Check target/surface co-ordinates
Material Changes Any changes to original notification?
Date of notification
Earliest spud date - allowed
Check target depth
Check target positional uncertainty
Check directional plot correct, annotated
correctly etc
Check anticollision (if any)
Survey Programme Tool performance and degree of positional
uncertainty
Casing Design General review of offset data
Pore pressure data
Fracture, LOT and FIT data
Temperature data Temperature data
Possible damaging gases Possible damaging gases (H2S, CO2 etc.) –
(H2S, CO2 etc.) – accounted for in casing design
accounted for in casing
design
Design criteria conforms Design criteria conforms with standards
with standards
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or provide the date of application, acknowledgment, consent or expiry.
Page 23 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification - continued Correct design factors Correct design factors used
used
Kick tolerance conforms with standards
Casing used conforms with design
Casing pressure test conforms with casing
design requirements and standards
Mud Programme Confirm mud weight range adequate,
accounting for pore & frac gradients, riser
margin
Cementing Programme Casing cementation conforms with casing
design
Wellhead Programme Pack-off and wellhead pressure tests
conforms with Casing Design and Standards
Drilling Hazards Check all hazards affecting well integrity
have been included – mechanical, pressure
and environmental
Check shallow gas and seabed hazards have
been included
Check maximum BHT and surface
temperature included
Check maximum surface pressure included
Check toxic gas hazards have been included
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or provide the date of application, acknowledgment, consent, or expiry.
Page 24 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification – continued Equipment Check that well control equipment is

specified, meets standards and is adequately
configured for operations, duty, pressures
and temperatures expected
Check that riser operating envelope has been
defined and meets standards and
requirements
Are all proposed activities covered by the rig
– installation safety case?
Testing Programme Maximum expected wellhead pressure and
temperature during testing included
Expected reservoir pressure and temperature
included
Expected reservoir fluids, gases included
Test string design formally issued and
acceptable for testing requirements,
pressure, temperature, fluids and gases.
Packer suitable for expected differential
pressure
Test string/packer elastomeric components
suitable for well environment
Pressure test programme suitable to verify
integrity of test string
Page 25 of 52

Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification – continued Does Packer fluid provide sufficient kill

capability?
Casing Design Is casing design suitable for proposed testing
programme and within standards?
Testing Programme Are significant quantities of toxic gases
expected?
Is the testing equipment designed to handle
toxic gases safely and within standards?
Will atmospheric and well stream fluids and
toxic gas levels be regularly monitored?
Testing Programme Has a HAZOP study been performed, include
date?
Has an emergency disconnection procedure
been completed?
Does the disconnection procedure provide
two or more well barriers?
Has well integrity been reviewed for hazards
and contingencies put in place?
Has surface equipment integrity been
reviewed for hazards and contingencies put
in place?
Has a well kill contingency been prepared,
does it meet requirement and standards?
Full BOP test prior to commencement of
testing?
Page 26 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
Dispensation from Standards/Policy Dispensation or Is effect of dispensation/amendment on well

and Programme Amendments Amendment integrity acceptable?
Does the amendment comply with
standards?
Is the amendment/dispensation correctly
approved and authorised?
Handover Certificate Certificate Completed as per standards
Details correct
Suspend/Abandon General details correct?
Date sent
Date of Consent
Is well to be suspended (temporarily
abandoned)?
Suspended (temporarily abandoned),
planned date for future use
Programme Does the proposed suspend/abandon
programme follow UKOOA guidelines and
standards?
Seabed Survey Certificate Certificate Any items of concern?
Final Well Schematic Schematic Correct?
Wellhead Schematic(Suspended wells Schematic Correct?
only)
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or provide the date of application, acknowledgement, consent, or expiry.
Page 27 of 52
FIGURE 8: CONSTRUCTION EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 1 OF 4

Document – Programme Information Information Verified Planned Actual Date Comment Sheet
Information Reference Examined Operation
Reviewed Completed Issued Number
Final Rig Position Co-ordinates Location UTM…mN

Location UTM…mE
Offset m
DDR or 30” casing seat Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT
HSE Weekly Rpt Casing specification
Maximum PGB inclination
Annulus top up job required?
TOC
20” casing seat Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Casing Specification
18 ¾” housing preloaded into 30”?
TOC
Casing pressure test
Choke & kill line test
BOP test pressure
LOT/FIT EMW
Kick Tolerance bbls
13.3/8” casing seat Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Casing Specification
TOC
Pack-off pressure test
BOP test pressure
Page 28 of 52

Document – Programme
Information Information Verified Planned Actual Date Comment Sheet
Information Reference
Examined Operation
Reviewed Issued Number
Completed
DDR or LOT/FIT EMW

HSE Weekly Rpt Kick Tolerance bbls
10.3/4” x 9.5/8” Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
seat
10.3/4” Casing specification
Cross over depth (ft MD BRT)
TOC
BOP test pressure
LOT/FIT EMW
Kick tolerance bbls
Mud weight for reservoir entry
Misc Op Rpts Log results Maximum recorded BHP
Impact of reservoir pressure on
casing design
Impact of reservoir pressure on test
string design
Impact of reservoir pressure on
surface test equipment
Maximum recorded BHT
Impact of max. recorded BHT on
pressure control equipment
Page 29 of 52

Misc Operation Impact of max. recorded BHT on

Reports test string design - elastomers
continued equipment
surface test equipment
Any record of unexpected amounts of
H2S, CO2
Impact of H2S, CO2 on casing design
Impact of H2S, CO2 on test string
design
Impact of H2S, CO2 on surface test
equipment
DDR or Production Liner Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)

HSE Weekly Top of Liner (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Report
Liner specification
Liner top packer used? Set?
BOP test pressure, pre test
operations
Liner inflow tested on cleanup?
Page 30 of 52

Daily Drilling Testing Sheet would be tailored to check

Report or HSE integrity of test construction and
Weekly Report or implementation against actual
other Misc programme to be implemented
reports
Daily Drilling Abandonment or Sheet would be tailored to check

Report or HSE Suspension integrity of Abandonment or
Weekly Report Suspension construction and
implementation against actual
programme to be implemented
Seabed Survey Certificate Any items of concern?

Certificate
Video record Video Review, items of concern, annotated
and suitable for filing
Page 31 of 52
FIGURE 9: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - DEVELOPMENT WELLS…. SHEET 1 OF 7
Acceptable Reviewed
Well Proposal or Basis of Design Co-ordinates Verify from maps provided

infrastructure?
Is the well location within 125m of licence
boundary?
Licence exception/restrictions
required?
Approval Any environmental conditions?
Site Survey Seabed Conditions Are problems likely – jackups, punch
through, scouring etc.? Anchoring conditions
favourable?
Seabed Hazards Any hazards identified?
Shallow Gas Hazards Shallow Gas identified?
Rig Move Programme Seabed and Mooring arrangements
Meteorological Hazards Weather limitations
Preloading, stomping, preloading etc
Page 32 of 52
FIGURE9: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - DEVELOPMENT WELLS…. SHEET 2 OF 7

Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification Application General details correct (water depth, rig

name, well name etc.)?
Date sent
Material Changes Any changes to original notification?
Date of notifcation
Earliest spud date - allowed
Directional Programme Check target/surface co-ordinates
Check target depth
Check target positional uncertainty
Check directional plot correct, annotated
correctly etc
Check anticollision (if any)
Survey Programme Tool performance and degree of positional
uncertainty
Mud Programme Confirm mud weight range adequate,
accounting for pore & frac gradients, riser
margin.
Casing Design General review of offset data
Pore pressure data
Fracture, LOT and FIT data
Temperate data
Possible damaging gases (H2S, CO2 etc.) –
accounted for in casing design?
Design criteria conforms with standards
Page 33 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification - continued Correct design factors used

Kick tolerance conforms with standards
Casing used conforms with design
Casing pressure test conforms with casing
design requirements and standards
Casing Design Check casing design complies with any
Multiwell consent documentation that may be
applicable
Cementing Programme Check cement program complies with any
multiwell consent documentation which may
be applicable
Casing cementation conforms with casing
design
Wellhead Programme Pack-off and wellhead pressure tests
conforms with casing design and standards
Drilling Hazards Check all hazards affecting well integrity
have been included
Check shallow gas and seabed hazards have
been included
Check maximum BHT and surface
temperature included
Check maximum surface pressure included
Check toxic gas hazards have been included
Page 34 of 52

Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification – continued Equipment Check that well control equipment is

specified, meets standards and is adequately
configured for operations, duty, pressures
and temperatures expected
requirements
Completion Date sent if different from notification to drill
Programme
Date Acknowledged
Material Changes Any changes to original consent?
Date of Consent
Earliest start date – allowed (21 days)
Notification Maximum expected wellhead pressure and
temperature during testing included
Expected reservoir pressure and temperature
included
Expected Reservoir fluids, gases included
Completion string design acceptable for
testing requirements, pressure, temperature,
fluids, and gases
Packer suitable for expected differential
pressure
Page 35 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification – continued Completion string/packer elastomeric

components suitable for well environment
Completion Pressure test programme suitable to verify
Programme integrity of completion string and sub
assemblies
Casing Design Is casing design suitable for proposed
completion, production, injection programme
and within standards?
Notification Are significant quantities of toxic gases
expected?
Is the completion and surface testing
equipment (if any) designed to handle toxic
gases safely and within standards?
Will atmospheric and well stream fluids and
toxic gas levels be regularly monitored?
Check completion schematic against the
planned workscope submitted
Has a HAZOP study been performed, include
date?
Has an emergency disconnection procedure
been completed?
Does the disconnection procedure provide
two or more well barriers?
Has well integrity been reviewed for hazards
and contingencies put in place?
Page 36 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
HSE Notification – continued Has a well kill contingency been prepared,

does it meet requirement and standards?
Completion Full BOP test prior to commencement of
Programme testing?
Dispensation from Standards/Policy Dispensation or Is effect of dispensation/amendment on well
and Programme Amendments Amendment integrity acceptable?
Does the amendment comply with Standards
Is the amendment/dispensation correctly
approved and authorised?
Handover Certificate Certificate Completed as per standards
Details correct?
Page 37 of 52
FIGURE 10: CONSTRUCTION EXAMINATION SHEET - DEVELOPMENT WELLS…. SHEET 1 OF 4

Document – Programme Information Examined Information Verified Planned Actual Date Comment Sheet
Information Reference Operation
Final Rig Pos. Co-ordinates Location UTM…mN

Location UTM…mE
Offset m
DDR or Conductor casing Shoe Depth (ft MDBRT, TVD BRT)
HSE Weekly Casing specification
Report Maximum PGB inclination
Annulus Top Up job required?
Anticollision results if applicable
Surface (20”) Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Casing specification
Preloaded 18 ¾” housing to 30”
TOC
BOP test pressure
LOT/FIT EMW
Kick tolerance bbls
Intermediate (13.3/8”) Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Casing specification
TOC
Page 38 of 52

Document – Programme Information Examined Information Verified Planned Actual Date Comment Sheet
Information Reference Operation
Daily Drilling Intermediate (13.3/8”) BOP test pressure

Report or HSE casing seat cont’d
Weekly Report
LOT/FIT EMW
Kick tolerance bbls
10.3/4” x 9.5/8” casing Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
seat 10.3/4” Casing specification
Cross over depth (ft MD BRT)
TOC
BOP test pressure
LOT/FIT EMW
Kick tolerance bbls
Mud weight for reservoir entry
Misc Operation Log results Maximum BHP
Reports
Impact of BHP on casing design
Impact of BHP on completion string
design
Page 39 of 52

Misc Operation Logs …cont’d Impact of reservoir pressure on

Reports surface completion equipment (if to
be used)
continued Maximum recorded BHT
pressure control equipment
completion string design - elastomers
equipment
surface PCE (if to be used)
Any record of unexpected amounts of
H2S, CO2?
Impact of H2S, CO2 on casing design
Impact of H2S, CO2 on completion
string design
Impact of H2S, CO2 on surface test
equipment (if to be used)
DDR or Production Liner Shoe Depth (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
HSE Weekly Top of Liner (ft MD BRT, TVD BRT)
Report Liner specification
Liner top packer used? Set?
BOP test pressure, pre test ops
Liner Inflow tested on cleanup?
Page 40 of 52

Daily Drilling Completion Sheet would be tailored to check

Report or HSE integrity of completion construction
Weekly Report and implementation against actual
or other Misc programme to be implemented
reports
Testing Sheet would be tailored to check
operation of any test production or
injection against actual programme
to be implemented
Daily Drilling Abandonment or Sheet would be tailored to check
Report or HSE Suspension integrity of Abandonment or
Weekly Report Suspension construction and
implementation against actual
programme to be implemented
Seabed Survey Certificate Any items of concern?
Certificate
Video record Video Review, items of concern, annotated
and suitable for filing
Page 41 of 52
FIGURE 11: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET – WORKOVERS AND WELL INTERVENTIONS FIXED INSTALLATION OR PLATFORM…. SHEET 1 OF 2
Acceptable Reviewed
Workover/Intervention design and Well Engineering Any areas of concern?

objectives documentation for design,
workscope, recompletion,
intervention etc
Workover Intervention Programme Completion design general
programme
Completion design wrt Safety Case or
multiwell consent documentation (if
applicable)
Kill fluid used sufficient overbalance as per
standards and procedures?
Barriers to flow comply with standards,
procedures, Safety case etc
Casing design still valid in workover
intervention, recompletion situation
Concurrent operations only carried out within
Safety case, standards, and procedures
Workover Intervention Programme Completion design suitable for current/future
programme well environment
Well schematic Schematic agrees with proposed workscope
Well Handover Documentation Date issued
Complies with Safety Case, standards, and
procedures.
Valve status provided, tree depressurised and
safe?
Page 42 of 52
FIGURE 11: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET – WORKOVERS AND WELL INTERVENTIONS FIXED INSTALLATION OR PLATFORM…. SHEET 2 OF 2
Acceptable Reviewed
Well Handover - continued Complies with Safety Case, standards, and

procedures.
Proof of well/completion integrity included,
record of pressure tests, annuli monitoring
etc.?
Dispensation from Policy, Document Does dispensation/amendment have an
Programme Amendment adverse effect on well integrity?
Does dispensation/amendment comply with
standards, procedures, and Safety Case?
Is dispensation/amendment approved and
authorised as per standards and procedures?
Page 43 of 52
FIGURE 12: CONSTRUCTION EXAMINATION SHEET - WORKOVERS AND WELL INTERVENTIONS FIXED INSTALLATION OR PLATFORM. SHEET 1 OF 1
Daily Drilling Report Workover – Sheet would be tailored to check

or HSE Weekly Well integrity of well and completion
Report or other Misc Intervention construction and implementation
reports Activity against actual work programme
Page 44 of 52
FIGURE 13: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET – WORKOVERS AND WELL INTERVENTIONS MODU…. SHEET 1 OF 3
Acceptable Reviewed
Well Proposal or Basis of Design Well Engineering Any areas of concern?

documentation for design,
workscope, recompletion,
intervention etc
Co-ordinates Verify from maps provided
infrastructure?
required?
HSE Notification Programme Date sent
Date of Acknowledgement
Earliest start date (21 days)
Completion design general
Completion design wrt Safety Case or
multiwell consent documentation (if
applicable)
Kill fluid used sufficient overbalance as per
standards and procedures
Barriers to flow comply with standards,
procedures, etc
Pressure tests sufficient to prove well
integrity
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or provide the date of application, acknowledgement, consent or expiry
Page 45 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
Casing design still valid in workover

intervention, recompletion situation
Combined Operations Safety Case completed
Safety harmonisation documentation
completed and in place
Well schematic Schematic reflects work programme, correct
data
Workover Intervention Programme Programme and HSE Notification consistent
programme
requirements
Well Handover Documentation Date issued
Complies with Safety Case, standards, and
procedures
Valve status provided, tree depressurrised
and safe?
Proof of well/completion integrity included,
record of pressure tests, annuli monitoring
etc
Notes: 1 – Information is correct or acceptable (i.e. within given parameters) or provide the date of application, acknowledgement, consent or expiry
Page 46 of 52
Acceptable Reviewed
Dispensation from Policy, Document Does dispensation/amendment have an

Programme Amendment adverse effect on well integrity?
Does dispensation/amendment comply with
Standards, procedures, and Safety Case?
Is dispensation/amendment approved and
authorised as per standards and procedures?
Page 47 of 52
FIGURE 14: CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY SHEET - WORKOVERS AND WELL INTERVENTIONS MODU. … SHEET 1 OF 1
Daily Drilling Report Workover – Sheet would be tailored to check

or HSE Weekly Well integrity of well and completion
Report or other Misc Intervention construction and implementation
reports Activity against actual work programme
Page 48 of 52
FIGURE 15 EXAMPLE OF WELL INTEGRITY REVIEW SHEET FOR PRODUCTION AND SUSPENDED WELLS
Project Period covered by Integrity Data Name of Well Examiner:
Well Details Tree Valve Tests SSSV Tests Annulus Bleed Down
Monitoring
Well Type Status Integrity Integrity Date Tree valve Result Date Result Frequency Date last Result Well Action Review Comments
Number Design test tests last SSSV annulus bleed Integrity require Date
Review procedures performed and last down problem d Y/N
Completed Approved logged tested Y/N
Page 49 of 52
FIGURE 16 FORMAL WELL EXAMINATION COMMENT/QUERY SHEET
Well Rig/Installation: Comment

Number: Sheet
Number:
WELL To: Comment
EXAMINER: (addressee) Sheet
Date:
Subject:
Examiners Comments Documentation reviewed,

page No, para, item No
etc.
Addressee’s Reply Date:
Comment Sheet Closed Well Examiner: Date:

Y/N
Further Comments:
6 September 2012 50 Rev 0:1

Well Examination
50
6.0 APPENDIX 3: List of Policies, Procedures, Codes, and

Standards
Document List as per current version of Operating Company Energy, Drilling
Management System
Document Revision Title Issued Date Comments

Code No by Issued
Operating Company Energy, Well

Barrier Principles & Design
Operating Company Energy, Wells’

Integrity Verification, Tolerance &
Control

Well Examination
51
7.0 APPENDIX 4: LIST OF WELLS INCLUDED IN OPERATING

COMPANY WELL EXAMINATION SCHEME
Fixed Installations and Associated Wells (including Subsea Wells)
Suspended Wells

Well Examination
52
Miscellaneous Operation Reports

Misc Operation Any record of unexpected amounts of Not expected
Reports H2S, CO2
Misc Operation Impact of H2S, CO2 on casing design Not expected
Reports
Well Incident report Date of issue Not expected
Well Incident report Date of incident Not expected
Well Incident report Is incident correctly described? Not expected
Oil spill report Date of issue Not expected
Oil spill report Date of spill Not expected
Oil spill report Is incident correctly described? Not expected
Safety Incident Date of issue Not expected
Safety Incident Date of incident Not expected
Safety Incident Is incident correctly described? Not expected

Well Examination
53

A5 Well Examination Rev 1 PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

A5 Well Examination Rev 1 PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Drilling Management System

OPERATING COMPANY NAME

Well Engineering & Drilling Operations

Functional Unit Name Signature Date

2.0 Well examination process

The well examiner is responsible for

Manager Well Operations

2.2. Design phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN APPENDIX

2.3. Construction phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

2.4. Workover phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

2.5. Operational phase (REF. PROCESS FLOW CHART IN

2.6. Suspension phase (SEE FLOW CHART OF PROCESS IN

2.7. Abandonment phase

2.8. End of well examination report (SEE EXAMPLES IN

2.9 Bi annual integrity report (SEE EXAMPLE IN FIGURE 13

2.10 Scheme review

3.0 Operating company responsibilities under the scheme

4.0 APPENDIX 1: Process charts

Figure 1: Diagram depicting the overlap between the Well

B Annulus B Annulus B Annulus

Well Construction and SCE Verified against

Dual Role (Well Integrity) Verification performed by IVB

Figure 2: RACI chart detailing the main roles and

Senergy Limited Well Integrity - Responsiblities (RACI) Chart.

Offshore Supervisor Production

Wellhead Original Equipment

Integrity Test Platform Well SSSV A R R R I I

Test Platform Well SSSV ESD System A R I I

Report Data Collected A R R I I I R I

Acquire any Dispensations Required C C C A I C I I

Submit to Well Examiner for Review A R I

Responsible R Does the work

Drilling Project Manager

Project Drilling Team

Figure 3: Operating Company Ltd Organisation Structure Showing

Drilling Project Manager

Design details Comment

Figure 4: Arrangements for Well Examination – Design

Well Examiner Drilling Project Manager responds

Daily Operation Reports or

Principal Drilling Well Examiner

Figure 5: Arrangements for Well Examination - Construction

Manager Well Operations responds

Daily Production and Well

Figure 6: Arrangements for Well Examination – Well

——————————————————————————— SENERGY QHSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

5.0 APPENDIX 2: Examples of examination sheets

——————————————————————————— SENERGY QHSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS …SHEET 1 OF 6

Well Name: Installation or Rig: Date:

Well Proposal or Basis of Design Co-ordinates Verify from maps provided

FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 2 OF 6

HSE Notification Application General details correct? (water depth, rig

Well Name: Installation or Rig: Date:

FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 4 OF 6

Well Name: Installation or Rig: Date:

HSE Notification – continued Equipment Check that well control equipment is

FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 5 OF 6

HSE Notification – continued Does Packer fluid provide sufficient kill

FIGURE 7: DESIGN EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 6 OF 6

Well Name: Installation or Rig: Date:

Dispensation from Standards/Policy Dispensation or Is effect of dispensation/amendment on well

FIGURE 8: CONSTRUCTION EXAMINATION SHEET - EXPLORATION/APPRAISAL WELLS…. SHEET 1 OF 4