` fH

Doc. Ref. No. : UTP-ACA-PROG-PD-2

Issue Version : 2.1
Date : January, 2018

GUIDELINES

CDB 4022 Plant Design II

FOR
SUPERVISORS AND STUDENTS

January 2018 Semester

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMME

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
32610 Bandar Sri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
Tel: (05) 3687565 Fax: (05) 3656176
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 OBJECTIVES 1
3.0 OUTCOMES 1
4.0 SCOPES 1
5.0 DURATION 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2
6.1 Students 2
6.2 Plant Design Project Coordinator (PDPC) 3
6.3 Committee of Supervisors 3
7.0 PROCESS FLOW OF PDP II 4
8.0 FINAL REPORT 5
8.1 Format 5
8.2 Contents 8
9.0 PRESENTATIONS 17
9.1 Final Oral Presentation 17
10.0 RESOURCES AND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS 17
11.0 ASSESSMENT METHOD 18
12.0 GRADING SCHEME 18
12.1 Final Report 18
12.2 Final Oral Presentation 18
12.3 Individual Progress Performance 18
12.4 C-Factor 19
12.5 Peer Review 19
12.6 UTP Grading Scheme 19
12.7 Plagiarism 20
13.0 REFERENCES 20
14.0 APPENDICES 21
Appendix I : Proposed Design Milestone 22
Appendix II : Sample title page and side labeling 23
Appendix III : Sample certification of approval 26
Appendix IV : Form PDP II-1 Requisition form 27
Appendix V : Evaluation Forms 28

i
1.0 INTRODUCTION

As a continuation from Plant Design I (FYDP-I), the students need to complete Plant
Design II (FYDP-II) which carries 2 credit hours. This guideline specifically addresses
the necessary information for students/supervisors in carrying out their duties for Plant
Design II in UTP.

2.0 OBJECTIVES

The main objective of PDP II is to train/develop students in the application of all the
elements of knowledge and skills that have been accumulated throughout the
undergraduate program for solving design related problems for typical process
industrial plant. The second objective of the course is to develop the skills of working
in a team and to nurture leadership qualities. Written and oral communication skills as
well as the capability in decision making are also nurtured by the project.

3.0 OUTCOMES

At the end of this course, students should be able to:

 Generate detailed equipment design using acceptable design code
 Design eco-friendly and efficient waste treatment system
 Perform detailed cost estimation and economic evaluation
 Employ effective interpersonal, communication, and teamwork skills

4.0 SCOPES OF WORK

The scopes of work for FYDP II are as follows:

 Making the necessary decisions, judgements and assumptions in design problems.
 Performing the process design of the major process units.
 Performing the mechanical design of the major process units.
 Performing the economic evaluation including capital cost estimation and
manufacturing cost estimation.
 Considering the environmental and safety issues related to the plant. Material
safety data sheet (MSDS) for all the chemicals involved must be part of the safety
and environmental discussion.

1
  Preparing the group and individual reports as per standard format and conducting
the oral presentations.

5.0 DURATION

PDP II carries 2 credit hours and students are expected to accomplish their project in
14 weeks during the second semester of their final year. A proposed Gantt chart of PDP
II can be found in Appendix I.

6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

6.1 Students

Students must make their own initiative and able to work in a team in bringing the
project to completion. Students will also be required to exercise teamwork spirit and
job co-ordination during undertaking the design project. The students may elect one of
their team members as the group leader. Among the expected responsibilities are as
listed below:
 Obtaining information and material rightfully and honestly. Plagiarism will cause
serious consequences.
 Seeking advice and guidance from supervisors when necessary.
 Maintaining good discipline and personal conduct when searching for relevant
information especially when out of campus.
 Preparing themselves against any failure such as work lost due to computer
crashes.
 Preparing a logbook for each member and maintain a good record of individual
activity and progress.
 Undertaking the detailed design of at least one unit operation per person.
 Submitting all reports on time as specified by plant design project coordinator.
 Giving/putting significant individual contribution or effort towards the
completion of the group task.
Failure to take the above responsibility/responsibilities may lead to failing the course.

2
6.2 Plant Design Project Coordinator (PDPC)

Head of Department will appoint a Plant Design Coordinator (PDPC) and his/her
assistants to coordinate PDP II. The responsibilities of PDPC and his/her assistants
include:
 Identifying and selecting design project title.
 Dividing students into respective groups.
 Assigning students to respective supervisors.
 Planning and managing the schedule for PDP II course implementation.
 Providing briefing on PDP II course requirements to lecturers and students.
 Arranging special seminars in selected topics related to the project to give
additional skills to the students to complete the project.
 Coordinating students' oral presentation.
 Arranging examiners to participate in the assessment of students' report and oral
presentation.
 Compiling and finalizing students' final scores for submission to examination
committee.
 The assistants of PDPC will assist him/her in all the above activities.

6.3 Committee of Supervisors

The committee consists of a main and with not more than two assistant supervisors. The
responsibilities of the committee can be summarized as below:
 Advising the students on the preparation of their design projects.
 Arranging meeting with students periodically. The supervisors are expected to
meet their students once in every two weeks.
 Monitoring students’ progress from time to time.
 Assisting students in defining the problem involved accordingly.
 Assigning the students to undertake individual detailed equipment design.
 Reviewing and assessing the individual student progress.
 Assessing reports and commenting on the work.
 Delivering seminar lectures on some special topics if requested by the PDPC.

3
7.0 PROCESS FLOW OF PDP II
The first stage of PDP II is to perform design improvement based on PDP I, including
PFD, P&ID, HAZOP etc. In addition, the students are required to specify the waste
treatment facilities and utility systems, as well as perform equipment sizing and costing
study for the plant before presenting their work in the final oral presentation. After
making the necessary corrections based on the comments provided during the final oral
presentation, the students are required to submit their group report using the ring file
(ABBA Earth Binder, Glued, Non PVC, 2D 50mm capacity). This submission format is
made as a strict requirement to ensure uniformity and ease of document identification
and handling as well as to facilitate the later task of storing the design reports. The final
stage is the detailed design of equipment. Each student is expected to perform a detailed
equipment design for one major equipment including the mechanical design and to
provide the specification sheets for two minor equipment. All the individual works have
to be compiled and submitted in another ring file (ABBA Earth Binder, Glued, Non
PVC, 2D 50mm capacity). The process flow diagram of PDP II is shown in Figure 1
and the corresponding Gantt chart can be found in Appendix I.

PDPII

Design Improvement Based on PDP I

Waste Treatment

Process Design of Major Units

Finalized Mechanical Design of Major Units

Specification of Minor Units

Process Economics & Cost Estimation

Oral Presentation

Group and Individual Report

Submission

Figure 1: Process flow of PDP II

4
8.0 FINAL REPORT
8.1 Format

8.1.1 Language
The report must be written in English Language.

8.1.2 Font and spacing

All text should be one and half spacing (Times New Roman regular font style, size 12)
written on a white A4 paper on one side of each sheet. The following however should
be single spaced:
 Foot notes
 Tables and figures

8.1.3 Length
The length of report should be not less than 100 and not more than 150 pages.
Students are strongly encouraged to use brief and straightforward expressions and to
avoid the use of jargons as far as possible. The page limit for individual design report
is limited to 60 pages per student.

8.1.4 Numbering
All pages should be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to the end of the
report. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and centered.

8.1.5 Heading and Margin

Major headings, such as INTRODUCTION, should be capitals, bold and font size 14.
Secondary headings such as Example should be in bold. The top, bottom, and right
margins are 1 inch except for the left margin, which is 1.3 inch.

8.1.6 Mathematical Text

Mathematical text must be spaced out; superscript and subscript must be clearly shown.
All equations, terms and symbols must be written in italic.

5
8.1.7 Tables and Figures
Tables and figures less than a page in size should be inserted into the text near the point
of reference. Tables should not be carried over to the next page. Margin limits are the
same as text full-page. All tables and figures should be numbered and captioned
consecutively. Table heading should be positioned at the top middle of each table. The
figure heading should be positioned at the bottom middle of each figure.

8.1.8 Bindings
The report must be properly presented in ABBA Earth Binder, Glued, Non PVC, 2D
50mm capacity. Each group is required to submit two folders, i.e. group work folder
and individual work folder. Format of both group and individual work folders are as
follows:

i) Group Report
1) Title page
2) Certification – approval by main supervisor after he/she is satisfied with the
correction or amendment done by students
3) Acknowledgements
4) Executive summary – max of 4 pages + PFD. Contents should include:
a) Project summary: Briefly describe the project with information such as:

Annual capacity/requirement
Main product
By product if any
Raw material 1
Raw material 2

b) Simple PFD in A3 size with major stream values

c) Material & energy balance highlights
d) Major equipment highlights with main dimensions displayed
e.g. Distillation column, Liquid extractor, reactor
e) Minor equipment highlights with brief specifications stipulated, e.g.,
heat exchangers & pumps
f) Highlights of:
 Utilities
 Waste treatment
 Economic evaluation & costs

6
  Plant location
 Plant layout
5) Table of contents
6) List of tables, figures and appendixes
7) The report must be arranged according to:
 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
 CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW
 CHAPTER 3 – CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND SYNTHESIS
 CHAPTER 4 – INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL
 CHAPTER 5 – SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION
 CHAPTER 6 – WASTE TREATMENT
 CHAPTER 7 – PROCESS ECONOMICS & COST ESTIMATION
8) Conclusion & Recommendation
9) References
10) Appendices
11) PFD size A1
12) P&ID size A1
13) Plant Layout size A3

ii) Individual Report

Every member of a group needs to perform:
1) ONE (1) detailed design of major equipment
2) TWO (2) minor equipment – in specification sheets

* each group is also required to submit the final design report (both group and
individual work folders) in soft copy preferably in compact disc (CD).
* segregate each chapter with a divider.
* use punch hole protection (reinforcing ring) for every page that you wish to submit.
* always refer to the guidelines for details.

7
8.2 Contents of Group Report

8.2.1 Title Page

The title page should be set out in accordance with the attached specimen sheet in
Appendix II. The project title should be clearly and precisely defined as has been
assigned by the PDPC.

8.2.2 Certification
This section should be approved by supervisor after he/she is satisfied with the
correction or amendment done by the student. See Appendix III for specimen sheet.

8.2.3 Acknowledgements
Most design teams obtain considerable assistance and advice from supervisors,
industrial consultants, librarians, faculty and fellow students. This section provides an
opportunity to acknowledge their contributions with an expression of appreciation and
thanks.

8.2.4 Executive Summary

The students should highlight all the important features of the report from the technical
reasons for undertaking the study to the conclusion. Remember that most readers only
read the summaries of reports and every word counts. Avoid padding phrases and
phrases that refer to the reports.

8.2.5 Table of Contents

All sections in the report should be listed, including the page numbers on which they
begin. Hence, all pages in the report, without exception, must be numbered. Each main
section must begin with a new page.

8
8.2.6 Main Body
The main body of the report must be composed of the following chapters:

Chapter 1: Introduction
Background of the design project, problem statement, objectives, scopes of work.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

Carry out research to uncover the latest information on feed and product properties,
product price, market, and possible site locations that may lead to a more profitable
design. Literature resources include encyclopedias, handbooks, journals, reports,
indexes and even World Wide Web (Internet). Standard method for quoting must be
implemented and standardize throughout the report.

Chapter 3: Conceptual Process Design and Synthesis

This chapter should be prepared in consultation of or based on either Douglas’

hierarchical decomposition approach or the Onion Model or a combination of both.

1. Level 1: Reactor Design and Reactor Network Synthesis

 Decision 1. Reactor performance:
(a) reaction scheme for the chosen process routes
(b) reactor type (flow pattern model, i.e., whether batch reactor (BR)/
plug-flow reactor (PFR) or CSTR) and
(c) reactor network (selecting conversion that maximizes selectivity
(also check the economic potential))
 Decision 2. Reactor operating conditions: (1) concentration, (2)
temperature, (3) pressure, (4) phase, (5) catalyst (inert (e.g.,
N2))
 Decision 3. Reactor configuration: reactor volume (capacity of reactor i.e.,
input and output flowrates, orientation, and configuration; some
of the more common types of reactor configuration are:
 tubular reactors
 shell-and-tube reactors
 stirred-tank reactors

9
  fixed-bed catalytic reactors (uses catalyst)
 fixed-bed noncatalytic reactors (does not use catalyst)
 moving-bed catalytic reactors
 fluidized-bed catalytic reactors
 fluidized-bed noncatalytic reactors
 kilns (e.g., used in the cement industry)
 fermentor
2. Level 2: Separation System Synthesis
 Decision 1. Types of separators: what type of suitable separators? (e.g.,
distillation, absorption, membrane)
 Decision 2. Sequencing of separators (for homogeneous mixtures): how are
the separators arranged? (here in this course, we are interested
in sequencing of distillation columns)
 Decision 3. Operating conditions: (a) temperature, (b) pressure, (c)
concentration, and (d) addition of extra components (although
undesirable)
3. Level 3: Heat Integration (Heat Exchanger Network; Heating and Cooling Utilities):
Students are highly encouraged to use the software package SPRINT (Process
Integration Software Version 2.2 by Centre for Process Integration, University of
Manchester) to assist in the development of the heat exchanger network.

Chapter 4: Instrumentation & Control

A basic control strategy should be performed for each stage of the process. In this report,
students should highlight the main points based on their PDP I work. A summary of
control requirements, possible controlled and manipulated variables must be presented
in table form. A production flowrate control strategy must be properly mentioned. No
tuning or calculation is required.

In a Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID), draw all control loops (transmitter,
controller and final elements) for the control requirements discussed in the report. No
advanced control strategy is required unless the control requirement cannot be achieved
with basic feedback control. Appropriate description must be given if advanced control
strategy is to be used.

10
All process equipment should be drawn roughly in proportion and identified by
equipment number. All pipes must be properly numbered. Block valve must be drawn
in small size for equipment isolation. Symbols in all drawings must follow the
PETRONAS Technical Standard (PTS).

A complete Piping and Instrumentation Diagram must be generated by using software

such as Microsoft® Visio (well-recommended) or AUTOCAD (less-recommended).

Chapter 5: Safety & Loss Prevention

5.1 Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP)
Carry out HAZOP assessment of the specific plant area in group based on their
PDP I work. The selection should be based on the process nodes that contain
highly hazardous materials and critical process conditions identified during
preliminary hazard study. Demonstrate the HAZOP study at least for THREE
(3) study nodes, in which the nodes must connect to ONE (1) major equipment.
An appropriate HAZOP worksheet and report must be produced.

5.2 Plant Layout

A simple but scaled plant layout arrangement for the plant should be drawn up
indicating access routes and safety appliances as well as storage / stock tanks,
silos etc. The siting criteria and layout of the plant should follow any Codes of
Practice and Industry Guidance. Students are required to provide relevant
justification/statement on the safety aspects of the plant layout.

Chapter 6: Waste Treatment

To ensure ethical and statutory requirements are fulfilled, pollution control and waste
disposal or treatment should be taken into account by referring to the process flowsheet.
All major waste must be properly identified and their flowrate and nature (i.e., phase,
characteristics, and compositions) must be defined. Appropriate regulation limit must
be stated and the treatment strategy should be proposed. Explanation supported with
basic flow diagram (or block flow diagram) that shows the major equipment would be
enough, without the need to include the auxiliary equipment such as pumps. In other
words, specific design is not required except for sizing of the major equipment for the
purpose of costing.

11
Chapter 7: Process Economics & Cost Estimation
Estimate capital items, operating costs and economic potential of the plant. Finally,
report the estimated return together with some recommendation as to the commercial
implications of the study. The Detailed Factorial Method with approximately 25%
accuracy must be used for detailed economic evaluation. Plant lifetime is fixed at 15
years.
(Note: Discussion needs to be included for every section starting from Chapter 3 to
Chapter 7. Explain the significance of the results, include comments and indicate further
developments.)

Conclusion & Recommendation

This section is important as it reflects the essence of the report. Hence, the highlights
from Introduction and Theory sections should be included. Do not repeat what has been
mentioned in the Discussion section.

References
All references including sources of physical data should be listed according to APA
citation format. The following method of referencing must be followed. In the text,
refer to the work by the last name of the author followed by the year in brackets. If there
are 2 authors give the last name of both the authors. If there are more than 2 authors
give the last name of the first author followed by et.al. In the bibliography, list all the
references in alphabetical order of the last name of the first author. All the authors must
be listed as shown in the examples below, followed by year in bracket, the name of the
article or book, the name of the journal, volume number and page number. In the case
of books, the name of the book, edition and publisher should follow the name of the
author and year. For example:

Nozhevnikova et.al (1997) has discussed the methanogenesis reactions taking place in
natural environments. Abu-Absi and Actis (1999) gave a detailed description of
different reactions taking place in an anaerobic reactor. Metcalf and Eddy (1991)
discussed the operational aspects of anaerobic reactions. Otton (1998) has presented
results on anaerobic digestion in fluidised bed reactors. Adam (2000) gave some
interesting insights into the natural anaerobic processes.

12
Listing of these references is as shown below.

Abu-Absi N.R., and L.A.Actis (1999), Encyclopaedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Bio
Catalysis and Bio Separation, Vol 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Adam, D. (2000), Where There is Muck There is Gas, http://www.nature.com/nsu_pf/000420-1.html

(access date)

Metcalf. C and R. Eddy (1991), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, 3 rd Ed. Mc-
Graw Hill Inc, New York.

Nozhevnikova, A.N., C.Hollinger, A.Amman and A.J.B Zehnder (1997), Methanogenesis in Sediments
from Deep Lakes at Different Temperatures (2-70oC), Water Science and Technology, Vol 36, No 3, pp
384-396.

Otton, V. (1998), Anaerobic Digestion in Fluidised Bed Reactor, Thesis, Institute National Polytechnik,
Grenoble.

Appendices
Lengthy calculations, figures, results from programming, derivation of design data, etc.
should be enclosed in the appendices. Students must provide a clear explanation and
the author name for each calculation.

All drawings must be drawn on the specific paper size as follows:

a) Process Flow Diagram : A1
b) Process and Instrumentation Diagram : A1
c) Individual Equipment : A3
d) Plant Layout : A3

Drawings (a), (b) and (d) should be included in the group work folder, whereas drawing
(c) in the individual work folder. All A1 and A3 drawings should be folded and inserted
in A4 sized plastic wallets, as part of the report.

13
8.3 Contents of Individual Report
Based on the specified input and output, each student is required to design ONE (1)
major and TWO (2) minor equipment.

The equipment selection must follow the guideline below:

1. All groups must have a detailed design for the following equipment if present in the
flowsheet.
Major equipment:
 Reactor
 Distillation column
 Absorption column
 Furnace

2. Only one student is allowed to undertake the detailed design for each equipment.

3. The rest of the group members must be assigned to conduct two of the following
equipment if available. The supervisor may propose to PDPC if there is other major
equipment that is not listed below for detailed design.
Minor equipment:
 Extraction columns
 Evaporator
 Membrane Units
 Cyclone
 Filter
 Cooling tower
 Sedimentation tanks

4. If minor equipment is not available, students can conduct the detailed design of major
equipment provided it is not the same unit.

5. The individual detailed design should cater for thermal design and proper material
selection, and mechanical design in such that appropriate dimensional drawing and
complete specification sheet can be generated.

14
6. The rest of the equipment in the process flowsheet must be properly sized by the
group such that appropriate capital cost can be estimated. No drawing is required for
these items. However specification sheets must be provided for such units, each
student to prepare the specification sheets for two minor equipment units. The minor
units may include the following.
a. Pumps
b. Heat exchangers
c. Stirrers
d. Material conveying equipment
e. Size reduction equipment
f. Size separation equipment
g. Pollution control equipment like bag filters, electrostatic precipitators etc.
h. Waste water treatment equipment like, Sedimentation tanks, filters, ion
exchangers etc.

7. Groups may propose the responsibility of individual design. The proposal must be
approved by the supervisor.

There are six important requirements that must be fulfilled:

a) Process Design
From fundamental governing equations, carry out the process calculations to optimize
the design within specified constraints. If the design involves any assumptions, they
should be clearly stated and justified. Critical evaluation and limitations of the design
calculations, including computer methods should be included. Complete process design
calculations must be included.

b) Specification sheet
All design parameters and material selection must be properly presented in appropriate
specification sheet.

15
c) Mechanical design of the equipment
The mechanical design of the equipment should include thickness of the vessel from
pressure considerations, thickness of tall vertical vessels by combined load calculations,
design of flanges, specification of nozzles, skirts, and supports.

d) Dimensional drawing
Appropriate dimensional drawing must be generated to visualize the orientation and
configuration of the unit operation. All critical parameters that directly affect the
process must be properly shown. For example, tube pitch and arrangement for heat
exchangers must be shown. All nozzles orientation must be clearly depicted.

e) Operating procedure
A basic operating procedure on how to start-up, operate and shut down the unit
operation. The shutdown procedure must include the safety aspect for carrying out
major maintenance work for the equipment.

(f) Equipment costing

You may consider making use of the graphs in the excellent process economics
textbook by Peters, Timmerhaus, and West (2004) for equipment costing. Note that this
section should be duplicated in the separate chapter on the economic evaluation and
profitability analysis of your complete plant design.

In this section, work load distribution among group members and equipment summary
must be properly presented. For each equipment, the sizing calculation, specification
sheet, drawings and operating procedure must be compiled together in one A4 sized
plastic wallet and appropriately attached as appendix. If there are four group members,
there shall be four separate plastic wallets that contain the complete design documents
(sizing calculations, spec-sheet, drawings, and procedures) for the respective
equipment. Evaluation will be conducted as per score sheets in Appendix V.

16
9.0 PRESENTATIONS

9.1 Final Oral Presentation

This is the crucial part where students need to convince the panel on the effectiveness
and the workability/practicability of their proposed design. Students are advised to
complete their reports two weeks before the deadline and concentrate on the
presentation that is scheduled in Week 12. Presentation will be held in front of a panel
that consists of selected representatives from various fields of expertise. Each group
will be given 40 minutes for oral presentation and 20 minutes for question & answer
session. This provides sufficient time to:
 introduce the design problem;
 provide an overview of the proposed process (emphasising alternative designs that
were rejected);
 discuss major sections of the proposed design by emphasising the strengths of the
design through: (a) the complete heat-integrated process flow diagram (PFD) of
the plant; (b) the complete piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) of the
plant; (c) the HAZOP analysis; (d) the design of the waste treatment facilities; and
other relevant aspects of the proposed design;
 present the individual major equipment design;
 present the results of the economic analysis and discuss other considerations;
 summarize the design and make recommendations.
Students who miss oral presentation will be given Grade F.

10.0 RESOURCES AND SERVICES REQUIREMENTS

Students are allowed to seek information or any sort of material needed for the project
at any institutions or other places. Application letters to Head of Programme should be
written by the students through the main supervisor. The main supervisor must fill-up
Form PDP-II (Appendix IV) and submit to PDPC together with the application letter.
All requisitions are subjected to approval of Head of Programme.

17
11.0 ASSESSMENT METHOD
At the end of the semester, all students’ work will be assessed and final grade will be
given. Table 1 summarizes the overall technique of assessment.

Table 1: Assessment Scheme

Examined by and % Contribution

Assessment Stage
Expert Internal Group Individual
Supervisor
Panels Examiner Mark Mark
Final Report
10 10 20
(Group)
Final Report
20 20 40
(Individual)
Final Presentation
10 10
(Group)
Final Presentation
10 10 20
(Individual)
Individual Progress 10 10
C-Factor 0 – 1.0
Total 50 30 20 30% 70%

12.0 GRADING SCHEME

12.1 Final Report

Main Supervisor and Expert Panels will evaluate the final reports (both group and
individual work folders). The percentage accounted for is shown in Table 1.

12.2 Final Oral Presentation

There are two types of assessment in the final oral presentation, namely group and
individual assessments. The percentages accounted for are shown in Table 1. Score
sheets in Appendix V will be used.

12.3 Individual Progress Performance

Each group is required to conduct an official meeting once in every two weeks. The
first official meeting must be held in the first lecture week of the semester. The last
official meeting will be held on Week 13, which will constitute a total of SEVEN (7)
official meetings. Minutes of meeting (MOM) must be submitted to the main supervisor

18
within ONE (1) week after the meeting. Supervisors have to evaluate the individual
progress performance. Individual progress performance will contribute 10% of the
overall individual marks. Students and supervisor may conduct additional meetings as
frequent as required.

12.4 C-Factor
C-factor is introduced to assess students on their contribution to the group work by the
supervisors. Supervisors can take the results from the peer review as a reference in
assessing the C-factor. The amount of the group mark that can be obtained by individual
is depending on the C-factor value that he/she gets.

12.5 Peer Review

Students get to evaluate among themselves through the peer review session by filling
up Form PDP II-3 (Appendix V) and return it to the PDPC.

12.6 UTP Grading Scheme

The overall marks for PDP II will be finalized by PDPC after all the forms have been
completed by the examiners. The final grades will be given according to Table 2 below:

Table 2: UTP Grading Scheme

Score Grade Point
85 – 100 A 4.00
80 –84.9 A- 3.75
75 – 79.9 B+ 3.50
65 – 74.9 B 3.00
55 – 64.9 C+ 2.50
50 – 54.9 C 2.00
45 – 49.9 D+ 1.50
40 – 44.9 D 1.00
0 – 39.9 F 0

19
12.7 Plagiarism

12.7.1 Common Forms of Plagiarism

 Incorporating the ideas, words from sentences, paragraphs, or parts without

appropriate acknowledgment and representing the product as one's own work.
 Slightly modifying other peoples’ work and submitting as your own.
 Copying text/graph/table/chart/ pictures/photos from articles/book/ internet
without proper citations.
 Using quotation without citing the source.
 Using materials prepared by professional agencies, individual and groups
without proper acknowledgement.

12.7.2 How to avoid Plagiarism

Applying the principles of good academic practices. When you are not sure
about the nature/forms of plagiarism, you can discuss the matter with your
supervisor/coordinator.

12.7.3 Penalties

UTP considers plagiarism as a serious offense. If a student is caught committing

plagiarism, stern action will be taken against the student including and not
limited to student given a grade of F for PDP II.

13.0 REFERENCES
Peters, Max S., Klaus D. Timmerhaus, and Ronald E. West. Plant Design and
Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004

20
APPENDICES

21
 Appendix I

Proposed Design Milestone

PLANT DESIGN II (CDB 4022):

WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
January Semester 2018
ACTIVITY Date 15-Jan 22-Jan 29-Jan 05-Feb 12-Feb 19-Feb 26-Feb 05-Mac 12-Mac 19-Mac 26-Mac 02-Apr 09-Apr 16-Apr
Review design performance on PDP I

Softcopy Report

Consolidation
Presentation

Final Report
Submission
Submission
Detailed Equipment Design (Individual)

Final Oral

Marks
Waste Treatment
Economics Evaluation: Cost Accounting and Capital Cost Estimation
Annual Costs, Earnings, and Profitability Analysis
Finalised Presentation and Reports

Important Dates:
Deadline for Softcopy Report Submission: 28 March (Week 11)
Tentative Date for Final Oral Presentation: 4 April (Week 12)
Deadline of Final Report (After Incorporating the Changes Suggested in Final Oral Presentation) Submission: 13 April (Week 13)

22
 Appendix II

CDB 4022
PLANT DESIGN II

TITLE

GROUP 1

ZAINAL ABIDIN HASSAN 10001

CHEAH SOON KIT 10002
GOVINDARAJOO SHANTI 10003
MICHEAL BALLACK 10004
NATASHA ZVEREVA 10005

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS

JANUARY 2018

23
 CDB 4022 PLANT DESIGN-II
SEMESTER JANUARY 2018
DESIGN OF XXXXXX PRODUCTION PLANT

24
GROUP XX GROUP REPORT
Side labeling:

Group Report
 CDB 4022 PLANT DESIGN-II
SEMESTER JANUARY 2018
DESIGN OF XXXXXX PRODUCTION PLANT

25
GROUP XX INDIVIDUAL REPORT
Individual Report
 Appendix III

CDB 4022 (Plant Design II)

PLANT DESIGN PROJECT

JANUARY SEMESTER (2018)

TITLE

GROUP XX

ZAINAL ABIDIN HASSAN 10001

CHEAH SOON KIT 10002
GOVINDARAJOO SHANTI 10003
MICHEAL BALLACK 10004
NATASHA ZVEREVA 10005

APPROVED BY,

____________________
(DR. ROSMAN ALWI)
DATE :

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS

26
 Appendix IV
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYPDP-01.01 0 January 2010 Form PDP II-1

REQUISITION FORM

27
 Appendix V

Form PDP II-2

Assessment of Individual Group Members by Supervisors and C-FACTOR

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Group No./Name:

Project Title:

Individual Progress C-factor

ID Name (Maximum score 10) (Awarded)

Assessment scheme:

Average Score Scale

7 – 10 Above expectations
4 –6 Meet expectations
1–3 Below expectations

Note: C-Factor Assessment Scheme

C-Factor Awarded Scale Criteria

1.0 Average - show contribution to the group work

- satisfactory progress on the group work
- attend the official meeting

0.7 Below - no/very little contribution to the group work

Average - no/ very little progress on the group work
- attend the official meeting
0 Poor - no contribution to the group work
- no progress on the group work
- not attending the meeting without valid reason

…………………………
(Signature)

Supervisor’s name: Date:

28
 Form PDP II-3

PEER REVIEW

CONFIDENTIAL:
(To be completed by the students and submitted to the PDPC)

Name:
Student ID:
Group No.:

Name of Team Member Evaluation* Overall Evaluation

(maximum score: 10) (C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5)/5
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

*Criteria for evaluation:

C1: Attendance at group meetings
C2: Team work and cooperation
C3: Knowledge input to project
C4: Timely and correct completion of project
C5: Overall contribution to successful completion of project

Assessment scheme:

Average Score Scale

7 – 10 Above expectations
4 –6 Meet expectations
1–3 Below expectations

Signature and name:

…………………………..
Date:

29
 Form PDP II-4

EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (OVERALL) FOR SUPERVISOR

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Group No: ______ Project Title:

Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure

Category Marks
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Executive summary (20) State clearly all the State clearly all the relevant State specifications for the State insufficient or non- Did not state sufficient or
important and relevant specifications for the design design problem to some relevant specifications for relevant specifications for
Inclusion of : specifications for the design problem. extent. the design problem. the design problem.
 Background of the problem.
design project which
stated the problem State clearly the capacity of State clearly the capacity of State the capacity of the State the capacity of the Did not state clearly the
statement and project the plant and its feedstock. the plant and its feedstock. plant and its feedstock. plant and its feedstock. capacity of the plant and its
specifications feedstock.
 Objectives and scope
of the design work Specify the work performed Specify the work performed Specify the work performed Specify some of the work Did not state sufficient or
required and all major decisions and decisions made while while carrying out the performed while carrying relevant work performed
 Brief mention on made throughout the design carrying out the design design project tasks. out the design project tasks. while carrying out the
findings project tasks. project tasks. design project tasks.
 Brief conclusion

Complete brief report on Complete brief report on Incomplete report on the Incomplete report on the Did not state the findings
the findings and conclusion. the findings and conclusion. findings and conclusion. findings and conclusion. and conclusion.

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

30

Category
Overall Design I (15):
Design Improvement on
PDP I
List of examiners’ comments
and amendments made on:
 Process Flow Diagram
(PFD)
 Instrumentation and
Control Strategy (P&ID)
 Safety and Loss
Prevention (HAZOP)
 Others
Overall Design II (40):
Waste Treatment (20)
 Identified wastes in the
design
 Appropriate regulatory
limits
 Block flow diagram to
treat all wastes
 Reasonable justification in
selecting treatment
method
Excellent
(A to A-)
Provide complete issues
from PDP I (PFD, P&ID,
HAZOP, etc.) and
amendments with strong
justification.
(Marks: 12.0-15.0)
Properly identify and
classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide complete issues
from PDP I (PFD, P&ID,
HAZOP, etc.) but limited
amendments and limited
justification.
(Marks: 9.0-11.9)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide incomplete issues
from PDP I (PFD, P&ID,
HAZOP, etc.) and limited
amendments and poor
justification.
(Marks: 6.0-8.9)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide incomplete issues
from PDP I (PFD, P&ID,
HAZOP, etc.) and very
limited amendments and
very poor justification.
(Marks: 3.0-5.9)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and insufficient
block flow diagram
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
Failure
Marks
(F)
Do not provide issues from
PDP I (PFD, P&ID,
HAZOP, etc.) and
amendments with no
justification.
(Marks: 0.0-2.9)
Do not identify and classify
the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
31
 Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Process Economics and
Cost Estimation (20) Provide a complete
calculation for capital items,
 Capital Cost Estimation operating costs and
 Commercial economic potential of the
Implementation plant with reasonable and
practical assumptions.
 Economic Estimation
Accuracy
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide sound technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Prove 25% accuracy using
the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
relevant assumptions.
Use relevant costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide reasonable
technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Show 25-35% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
errors.
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide relevant technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Prove 35-45% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide incomplete
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with very limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor error.
Use reasonable costs and
prices but with no proper
research in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide poor technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Prove 45-55% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
Failure
Marks
(F)
Lack or wrong technical
assumptions in the
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant.
Use unreasonable and
wrong values for costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Lack technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Show 100% error using the
Detailed Factorial Method.
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
32
 Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Conclusion and Relate the outcome from the
Recommendation (10) project to the objectives
clearly.
 Relevancy to the
objectives
 Suggested future Discuss the feasibility of the
works on feasibility of design thoroughly, or
design design has practical,
technical and economic
feasibility.
Provide technical and
constructive suggestions to
improve the design.
(Marks: 8.0-10.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design, or design has
limited practical, technical
and economic feasibility.
Provide suggestions to
improve the design.
(Marks: 6.0-7.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives
limitedly.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design limitedly, or design
has limited practical,
technical and economic
feasibility.
Provide limited suggestions
to improve the design.
(Marks: 4.0-5.9)
Below Average Failure
Marks
(D+ to D) (F)
Relate the outcome from the Do not relate the outcome
project to the objectives from the project to the
insufficiently. objectives, or the outcome
does not match the
objectives.
Discuss the feasibility of the Did not discuss feasibility
design insufficiently, or of the design. Design is not
design has very limited feasible.
practical, technical and
economic feasibility.
Provide irrelevant Do not provide technical
suggestions to improve the and constructive
design. suggestions to improve the
design.
(Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)
33
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure
Category Marks
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Others (15)
Follows the formatting Follows the formatting Follows an acceptable Uses an inconsistent Not following any standard
 Compliance to standard style stated by the style stated by the formatting style though not formatting style. formatting style.
guideline guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines.
 Neatness and consistency Follows the method of Follows the method of Follows acceptable method Provide an inconsistent No proper method of
in formatting style referencing stated by the referencing stated by the of referencing though not method of referencing but referencing.
 References are quoted guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines. not as per the guidelines
and listed appropriately provided.
(APA reference style)
 Proper English Usage The report is very well The report is well The report is structured The report is not structured No organization of content.
Writing Skill structured and provides structured and provides with minimum with obvious
good flow of information good flow of information disorganization. disorganization.
and discussion. (with very minimum
disorganization).

The content is The content is easy to be The content is easy to be The content is slightly The content is difficult to
comprehensive, easy to be understood with minimal understood with some difficult to be understood be understood with
understood with very spelling or grammatical spelling or grammatical with significant amount of significant amount of
minimal spelling or errors. errors. spelling and grammatical spelling and grammatical
grammatical errors. errors. errors.

(Marks: 12.0-15.0) (Marks: 9.0-11.9) (Marks: 6.0-8.9) (Marks: 3.0-5.9) (Marks: 0.0-2.9)

Comments:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.………………………….
Supervisor’s signature

Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ____________________

34
 Form PDP II-5

FYDP II – INDIVIDUAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FOR SUPERVISOR

(To be completed by Supervisor)

Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________

Group No: ______ Major Equipment: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Minor Equipment I: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment II: ________________________________________

Minor Equipment III: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment IV: ________________________________________

Programme: Chemical Engineering

Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks

Category
(A to A-)
Process design of major
equipment (20) Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
 Design methodology selection of process design
 Basis of selection for major equipment.
 Sample calculation
 Specification sheet The individual follows all
the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows
some of the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows few
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process design for major
equipment
The individual does not
follow parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

35
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)

Minor Equipment I (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment II (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment II with minor equipment II with equipment II with design equipment II with design
 Specification sheet equipment II with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology and
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment III (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment IV (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

36

Category
Mechanical design of
equipment (20)
 Material selection
 Pressure vessel thickness
calculations
 Combined stress for tall
columns
 Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and supports
Drawing of equipment
(10)
 Standards, dimensioning
and neatness
Operating procedure (10)
 Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures
Excellent
(A to A-)
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification of
selection of material
Clearly demonstrate the
correct calculations for
pressure vessel thickness
and combined stress for tall
columns with citation
support
Provide a complete
calculations and mechanical
specification of sheet
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
The equipment drawing
follows complete standards
with absolute dimensioning
of the equipment and
neatness.
(Marks: 8.0-10.0)
Provide a complete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with clear
practical assumptions.
(Marks: 8.0-10.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification of the selection
of material
Clearly demonstrate the
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns with text book
support
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment and neatness.
(Marks: 6.0 -7.9)
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with relevant
practical assumptions.
(Marks: 6.0 -7.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification of the
selection of material
.
Show limited calculations
for pressure vessel
thickness and combined
stress for tall columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and most of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment.
(Marks: 4.0-5.9)
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
(Marks: 4.0-5.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification of the selection
of material
Show very limited or
minimum technical
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and few of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
The equipment drawing
does not follow complete
standards with
dimensioning of the
equipment.
(Marks: 2.0-3.9)
Provide an incomplete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
(Marks: 2.0-3.9)
Failure Marks
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification of the selection
of material
Lack or show wrong
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns.
Provide an incomplete or
wrong calculations and
mechanical specification
sheet of equipment and its
component (Flanges,
nozzles, skirts and other
supports)
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
The equipment drawing is
difficult to understand with
dimensioning errors of the
equipment with no
neatness.
(Marks: 0.0-1.9)
Lack or wrong technical
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment
(Marks: 0.0-1.9)
37
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category (A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Others (10)
Follows the formatting Follows the formatting Follows an acceptable Uses an inconsistent Not following any standard
style stated by the style stated by the formatting style though not formatting style. formatting style.
 Compliance to standard guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines.
guideline
 Neatness and consistency Follows the method of Follows the method of Follows acceptable method Provide an inconsistent No proper method of
in APA formatting style referencing stated by the referencing stated by the of referencing though not as method of referencing but referencing
 References are quoted guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent per the guidelines. not as per the guidelines
and listed appropriately provided.
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill The report is very well The report is well The report is structured The report is not structured No organization of content.
structured and provides structured and provides with minimum with obvious
good flow of information good flow of information disorganization. disorganization
and discussion. (with very minimum
disorganization).

The content is The content is easy to be The content is easy to be The content is slightly The content is difficult to
comprehensive, easy to be understood with minimal understood with some difficult to be understood be understood with
understood with very spelling or grammatical spelling or grammatical with significant amount of significant amount of
minimal spelling or errors. errors. spelling and grammatical spelling and grammatical
grammatical errors errors. errors.

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

TOTAL /90

Comments:

.………………………….………………………
Supervisor’s signature

Name : ____________________________________________ Date : ____________________

38

PDP II – EVALUATION OF FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION (GROUP)
(To be completed by Examiner)
Group No: ______ Project Title : ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Project Overview (20) Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
 Reactor Design and design and network
Reactor Network synthesis for reactor and
Synthesis separation systems.
 Separation System -
Type of Separator and Clearly show technical
Operating conditions application of fundamental
knowledge with latest
 Process Flow Diagram
literature support.
(PFD)
 Basic control strategy
 Piping and Provide two PFDs which
Instrumentation Diagram clearly show the differences
(P&ID) made via the
 Hazard and Operability implementation of heat
Studies (HAZOP) integration.
 Plant Layout
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly shows
the control system
thoroughly with technical
accuracy.
Provide a thorough HAZOP
worksheet that clearly
shows the study results with
technical accuracy.
Provide a complete and
scaled plant layout.
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge with textbook
support.
Provide two PFDs which
clearly show the differences
made via the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly shows
the control system with
some technical accuracy.
Provide a HAZOP
worksheet that shows the
study results with some
technical accuracy.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement.
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
design and network
synthesis for reactor and
separation systems.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide only one PFD but
correctly show all the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that do not show
the control system
thoroughly (incomplete).
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
minor technical errors.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement.
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Show very limited or
minimum technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide only one PFD but
with errors on the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide a PID that shows
the incomplete control
system, with some technical
errors and not according to
PETRONAS Technical
Standard.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
major technical errors.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement.
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-6
Failure Marks
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
No information or evidence
on the implementation of
heat integration.
No drawing or evidence on
the implementation of
control strategy.
No worksheet or evidence
on the implementation of
HAZOP study.
Lack or provide wrong plant
layout arrangement.
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
39
 Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Waste Treatment (30) Properly identify and
classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
 Identification of Major (i.e. phase, characteristics,
Waste and compositions).
 Identification of
Regulation limit
 Appropriate Method of State appropriate regulation
limit.
Treatment and Basic
flow diagram
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment.
(Marks: 24.0-30.0)
Process Economics and Provide a complete
Cost Estimation (30) calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
 Capital Estimation plant with reasonable and
 Operating Cost practical assumptions.
 Economic Potential
Provide sound technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Prove 25% accuracy using
the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 24.0-30.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment.
(Marks: 18.0-23.9)
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
relevant assumptions.
Provide reasonable
technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Show 25-35% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 18.0-23.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram.
(Marks: 12.0-17.9)
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
errors.
Provide relevant technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Prove 35-45% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 12.0-17.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and insufficient
block flow diagram.
(Marks: 6.0-11.9)
Provide a calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
very limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
error.
Provide poor technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Prove 45-55% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
(Marks: 6.0-11.9)
Failure Marks
(F)
Do not identify and classify
the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 0.0-5.9)
Lack or wrong technical
assumptions in the
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant.
Lack technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Show 100% error using the
Detailed Factorial Method.
(Marks: 0.0-5.9)
40

Category
Team Work (20)
Ability to work with others
in order to provide best
performance/presentation.
Comments:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.………………………….………………………
Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________
Excellent
(A to A-)
Completed the presentation
within the time given. Show
high coordination of tasks
and smooth transition
between members.
Highly awareness
/attentiveness between
members.
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Completed the presentation
within the time given. Show
good coordination of tasks
and good/smooth transition
between members.
Good awareness
/attentiveness between
members.
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Exceed the time given to
complete the presentation
(1-2 minutes). Show
moderate coordination of
tasks and smooth transition
between members.
Members are aware and
focus with other member’s
tasks.
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average Failure Marks
(D+ to D) (F)
Exceed the time given to Did not complete the
complete the presentation presentation within the time
(3-4 minutes). Show no given (more than 5
coordination of tasks and minutes). No clear division
irregular/unsmooth or coordination of tasks
transition between among members.
members.
Low focus /attentiveness Members are not focus and
between members. attentive towards other
members.
(Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Date : ______________________
41

FYDP II – EVALUATION OF FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION (INDIVIDUAL)
(To be completed by Supervisor/Examiner)
Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Programme: Chemical Engineering
Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Process design of major
equipment (20) Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
 Design methodology selection of process design
 Basis of selection for major equipment.
 Sample calculation
 Specification sheet
 Drawing of equipment The individual follows all
the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
The equipment drawing
follows complete standards
with absolute dimensioning
of the equipment and
neatness.
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment and neatness.
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows
some of the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment.
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows few
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
The equipment drawing
does not follow complete
standards with
dimensioning of the
equipment.
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-7
Failure Marks
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process design for major
equipment
The individual does not
follow parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
The equipment drawing is
difficult to understand with
dimensioning errors of the
equipment with no neatness.
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
42
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Non-verbal
Communication (20) The oral presentation is The oral presentation is The oral presentation is The oral presentation is The oral presentation does
presented in complete presented in professional tried to present in tried to present in not satisfy professionalism
professional way regarding way regarding the dressing, professional way regarding professional way but with regarding the dressing,
 Professionalism: the dressing, expressions, expressions, enthusiasm and the dressing, expressions, lack of confidence and expressions, enthusiasm and
appearance, Facial enthusiasm and confidence confidence enthusiasm and confidence enthusiasm confidence
expression;
confidence, The non-verbal The non-verbal The non-verbal The non-verbal The non-verbal
enthusiasm communication takes no communication takes few communication takes few communication lacks eye communication does not
 Gesture: Eye Contact, pauses with full eye contact pauses with full eye contact pauses with most of the eye contact with several pauses satisfy the eye contact with
Pauses contact during presentation. several pauses during
presentation.

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

Clarity of presentation
(40) The presentation shows the The presentation skills The presentation shows The presentation shows the The presentation does not
clear vocal clarity with show vocal clarity with most of the vocal clarity lack in vocal clarity with show the vocal clarity with
quality professional clear professionalism with professional presenting satisfactory presenting unsatisfactory presenting
 Vocal Clarity and presenting skills skills skills skills
Quality: volume, rate,
articulation,
pronunciation natural, The choice of words are The choice of words are The choice of words are The choice of words are The choice of words are
conversational, emphasis perfect with fluent good with fluent satisfactory with fluent satisfactory with lack in unsatisfactory with no
 Fluency and choice of consistency consistency consistency fluent consistency fluent consistency
words: (using language
clearly and accurately)
Pronunciation, The presentation covers all The presentation covers The presentation covers The presentation covers few The presentation does not
articulation the relevant aids (graphs, relevant aids (graphs, most of the relevant aids relevant aids (graphs, cover any relevant aids
 Continuity of diagrams and objects) in diagrams and objects) with (graphs, diagrams and diagrams and objects) with (graphs, diagrams and
Presentation organized form organized form objects) with deficient in deficient in organized form objects) with deficient in
 Use of aids (graphs, organized form organized form
diagrams, objects etc) .
 Organization: logical
.
flow, time management

(Marks: 32.0-40.0) (Marks: 24.0-31.9) (Marks: 16.0-23.9) (Marks: 8.0-15.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)

43
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Questions and Answers
(20) The individual clearly The individual answered all The individual answered The individual answered The individual does not
answered all the questions the questions with most of the questions with few questions with answered any questions
 Creativity – use of with convincing knowledge convincing knowledge satisfactory knowledge satisfactory knowledge with convincing knowledge
example using relevant examples. using relevant example. using relevant example. using example. with irrelevant examples.
 Convincing Answer,
Showing creativity and The individual shows full The individual shows The individual shows The individual shows The individual does not
Innovativeness anticipation and maintain anticipation and maintain satisfactory anticipation and satisfactory anticipation and show anticipation and does
 Ability to anticipate and very good relation with the very good relation with the maintain good relation with maintain normal relation not maintain good relation
answer questions questioners questioners the questioners with the questioners with the questioners
 Ability to maintain good
relationship with
questioners

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.………………………….………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature

Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________

44
 Form PDP II-8
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN) FOR INTERNAL EXPERT
(PROCESS ECONOMICS AND COST ESTIMATION)

(To be completed by Internal Expert)

Group No: ______ Project Title:

Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks

Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Chapter 7:
Process Economics and Provide a complete Provide calculation for Provide calculation for Provide incomplete Lack or wrong technical
Cost Estimation (20) calculation for capital capital items, operating capital items, operating calculation for capital assumptions in the
items, operating costs and costs and economic costs and economic items, operating costs and calculation for capital
economic potential of the potential of the plant with potential of the plant with economic potential of the items, operating costs and
 Capital Cost Estimation plant with reasonable and relevant assumptions. limitedly justified plant with very limitedly economic potential of the
 Commercial practical assumptions. assumptions and minor justified assumptions and plant.
Implementation errors. minor error
 Economic Estimation
Accuracy Use the latest costs and Use relevant costs and Use the latest costs and Use reasonable costs and Use unreasonable and
prices in the detailed prices in the detailed prices in the detailed prices but with no proper wrong values for costs and
economic calculation. economic calculation. economic calculation. research in the detailed prices in the detailed
economic calculation. economic calculation.

Provide sound technical Provide reasonable Provide relevant technical Provide poor technical and Lack technical and
and practical technical and practical and practical practical recommendation practical recommendation
recommendation as to the recommendation as to the recommendation as to the as to the commercial as to the commercial
commercial commercial commercial implementation of the implementation of the
implementation of the implementation of the implementation of the process. process.
process. process. process.

Prove 25% accuracy using Show 25-35% accuracy Prove 35-45% accuracy Prove 45-55% accuracy Show 100% error using the
the Detailed Factorial using the Detailed using the Detailed using the Detailed Detailed Factorial Method.
Method. Factorial Method. Factorial Method. Factorial Method.

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

45
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Others (10)
 Compliance to standard Follows the formatting Follows the formatting Follows an acceptable Uses an inconsistent Not following any
guideline style stated by the style stated by the formatting style though formatting style. standard formatting style.
 Neatness and guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. not as per the guidelines.
consistency in
formatting style Follows the method of Follows the method of Follows acceptable Provide an inconsistent No proper method of
 References are quoted referencing stated by the referencing stated by the method of referencing method of referencing but referencing.
and listed appropriately guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. though not as per the not as per the guidelines
 Proper English Usage guidelines. provided.
Writing Skill
The report is very well The report is well The report is structured The report is not structured No organization of
structured and provides structured and provides with minimum with obvious content.
good flow of information good flow of information disorganization. disorganization.
and discussion. (with very minimum
disorganization).

The content is The content is easy to be The content is easy to be The content is slightly The content of the report is
comprehensive, easy to be understood with minimal understood with some difficult to be understood difficult to be understood
understood with very spelling or grammatical spelling or grammatical with significant amount of with significant amount of
minimal spelling or errors. errors. spelling and grammatical spelling and grammatical
grammatical errors. errors. errors.

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

TOTAL /30

Comments:

.………………………
Examiner’s signature

Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________

46

(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Excellent
Category
(A to A-)
Chapter 6:
Properly identify and
Waste Treatment (20) classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
 Identified wastes in the (i.e. phase, characteristics,
design and compositions).
 Appropriate regulatory
limits State appropriate
 Block flow diagram to regulation limit.
treat all wastes
 Reasonable justification Propose pollution control,
in selecting treatment waste disposal and
method treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN)
(WASTE TREATMENT STRATEGY)
Good
(B+ to B)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate
regulation limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate
regulation limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and
insufficient block flow
diagram
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-9
Failure Marks
(F)
Do not identify and
classify the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
47
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Others (10)
 Compliance to standard Follows the formatting Follows the formatting Follows an acceptable Uses an inconsistent Not following any standard
guideline style stated by the style stated by the formatting style though not formatting style. formatting style.
 Neatness and consistency guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines.
in formatting style
Follows the method of Follows the method of Follows acceptable method Provide an inconsistent No proper method of
 References are quoted
referencing stated by the referencing stated by the of referencing though not method of referencing but referencing.
and listed appropriately
guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines. not as per the guidelines
 Proper English Usage
provided.
Writing Skill
The report is very well The report is well The report is structured The report is not structured No organization of content.
structured and provides structured and provides with minimum with obvious
good flow of information good flow of information disorganization. disorganization.
and discussion. (with very minimum
disorganization).
The content is The content is easy to be The content is easy to be The content is slightly The content of the report is
comprehensive, easy to be understood with minimal understood with some difficult to be understood difficult to be under stood
understood with very spelling or grammatical spelling or grammatical with significant amount of with significant amount of
minimal spelling or errors. errors. spelling and grammatical spelling and grammatical
grammatical errors. errors. errors.

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

TOTAL /30

Comments:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.………………………
Examiner’s signature

Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________

48
 Form PDP II-10

FYDP II – INDIVIDUAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FOR INTERNAL EXPERT

(To be completed by Internal Expert)

Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________

Group No: ______ Major Equipment: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Minor Equipment I: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment II: ________________________________________

Minor Equipment III: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment IV: ________________________________________

Programme: Chemical Engineering

Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks

Category
(A to A-)
Process design of major
equipment (20) Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
 Design methodology selection of process design
 Basis of selection for major equipment.
 Sample calculation
 Specification sheet The individual follows all
the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows
some of the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows few
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process design for major
equipment
The individual does not
follow parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment

(Marks: 16.0-20.0) (Marks: 12.0-15.9) (Marks: 8.0-11.9) (Marks: 4.0-7.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)

49
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)

Minor Equipment I (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment II (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment II with minor equipment II with equipment II with design equipment II with design
 Specification sheet equipment II with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology and
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment III (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

Minor Equipment IV (10) Provide a complete and Provide comprehensive Provide relevant but not Provide general and limited Lack or provide wrong
comprehensive technical technical description of technical description of description of minor description of minor
 Design methodology description of minor minor equipment I with minor equipment I with equipment I with design equipment I with design
 Specification sheet equipment I with design design methodology and design methodology and methodology and few errors methodology
methodology and specification sheet specification sheet in specification sheet
specification sheet

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

50

Category
Mechanical design of
equipment (20)
 Material selection
 Pressure vessel thickness
calculations
 Combined stress for tall
columns
 Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and supports
Drawing of equipment
(10)
 Standards, dimensioning
and neatness
Operating procedure (10)
 Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures
Excellent
(A to A-)
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification of
selection of material
Clearly demonstrate the
correct calculations for
pressure vessel thickness
and combined stress for tall
columns with citation
support
Provide a complete
calculations and mechanical
specification of sheet
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
(Marks: 16.0-20.0)
The equipment drawing
follows complete standards
with absolute dimensioning
of the equipment and
neatness.
(Marks: 8.0-10.0)
Provide a complete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with clear
practical assumptions.
(Marks: 8.0-10.0)
Good
(B+ to B)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification of the selection
of material
Clearly demonstrate the
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns with text book
support
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
(Marks: 12.0-15.9)
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment and neatness.
(Marks: 6.0 -7.9)
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with relevant
practical assumptions.
(Marks: 6.0 -7.9)
Average
(C+ to C)
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification of the
selection of material
Show limited calculations
for pressure vessel
thickness and combined
stress for tall columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and most of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
(Marks: 8.0-11.9)
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment.
(Marks: 4.0-5.9)
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
(Marks: 4.0-5.9)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Provide general and limited
justification of the selection
of material
Show very limited or
minimum technical
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and few of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
(Marks: 4.0-7.9)
The equipment drawing
does not follow complete
standards with
dimensioning of the
equipment.
(Marks: 2.0-3.9)
Provide an incomplete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
(Marks: 2.0-3.9)
Failure Marks
(F)
Lack or provide wrong
justification of the selection
of material
Lack or show wrong
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns.
Provide an incomplete or
wrong calculations and
mechanical specification
sheet of equipment and its
component (Flanges,
nozzles, skirts and other
supports)
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
The equipment drawing is
difficult to understand with
dimensioning errors of the
equipment with no
neatness.
(Marks: 0.0-1.9)
Lack or wrong technical
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment
(Marks: 0.0-1.9)
51
 Excellent Good Average Below Average Failure Marks
Category
(A to A-) (B+ to B) (C+ to C) (D+ to D) (F)
Others (10)
Follows the formatting Follows the formatting Follows an acceptable Uses an inconsistent Not following any standard
style stated by the style stated by the formatting style though not formatting style. formatting style.
 Compliance to standard guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent. as per the guidelines.
guideline
 Neatness and consistency Follows the method of Follows the method of Follows acceptable method Provide an inconsistent No proper method of
in formatting style referencing stated by the referencing stated by the of referencing though not as method of referencing but referencing
 References are quoted guidelines accurately. guidelines to some extent per the guidelines. not as per the guidelines
and listed appropriately provided.
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill The report is very well The report is well The report is structured The report is not structured No organization of content.
structured and provides structured and provides with minimum with obvious
good flow of information good flow of information disorganization. disorganization
and discussion. (with very minimum
disorganization).

The content is The content is easy to be The content is easy to be The content is slightly The content is difficult to
comprehensive, easy to be understood with minimal understood with some difficult to be understood be understood with
understood with very spelling or grammatical spelling or grammatical with significant amount of significant amount of
minimal spelling or errors. errors. spelling and grammatical spelling and grammatical
grammatical errors errors. errors.

(Marks: 8.0-10.0) (Marks: 6.0 -7.9) (Marks: 4.0-5.9) (Marks: 2.0-3.9) (Marks: 0.0-1.9)

TOTAL /90

Comments:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

.………………………….………………………
Internal expert’s signature
Name : ____________________________________________ Date : ____________________

52