Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

CASE 26 When International Buyers and Sellers

Disagree

No matter what line of business you’re in, you can’t escape sex. That the taste of the American consumer. “If pork livers, whatever the
may have been one conclusion drawn by an American exporter of sex of the animal, are palatable to Americans, they ought to be
meat products after a dispute with a German customer over a ship- good enough for anyone,” the American thought.
ment of pork livers. Here’s how the disagreement came about. It looked as if the buyer and seller could never agree on eating
The American exporter was contracted to ship “30,000 lbs. of habits.
freshly frozen U.S. pork livers, customary merchantable quality,
first rate brands.” The shipment had been prepared to meet the ex-
acting standards of the American market, so the exporter expected QUESTIONS
the transaction to be completed without any problem. But when
the livers arrived in Germany, the purchaser raised an objection: 1. In this dispute, which country’s law would apply, that of the
“We ordered pork livers of customary merchantable quality—what United States or of Germany?
you sent us consisted of 40 percent sow livers.” 2. If the case were tried in U.S. courts, who do you think would
“Who cares about the sex of the pig the liver came from?” the win? In German courts? Why?
exporter asked. 3. Draw up a brief agreement that would have eliminated the
“We do,” the German replied. “Here in Germany we don’t pass following problems before they could occur:
off spongy sow livers as the firmer livers of male pigs. This ship- a. Whose law applies.
ment wasn’t merchantable at the price we expected to charge. The
b. Whether the case should be tried in U.S. or German courts.
only way we were able to dispose of the meat without a total loss
was to reduce the price. You owe us a price allowance of $1,000.” c. The difference in opinion as to “customary merchantable
The American refused to reduce the price. The determined re- quality.”
sistance may have been partly in reaction to the implied insult to 4. Discuss how SRC may be at work in this case.

cat2994X_case2_019-046.indd 39 8/27/10 2:05 PM

Вам также может понравиться