Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Journal of Public Health | Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 427–428 | doi:10.

1093/pubmed/fdx104

Guest Editorial

Promoting the ethics of promoting the the science of social justice, overcoming the forces that
public’s health: a call for papers; a call for undermine the future security of families, communities
debate and peoples. Public health leadership in England is failing.
It is well established that moral mandates sit at the core of It is time for those leaders to discover courage and
good public health policy and practice.1 Though they may purpose.7
sometimes prove to be competing commitments, the key
aims of public health—promoting overall levels of health Some representatives of the targets of these powerful
and addressing inequitable health inequalities—are goals words offered a response.8 And we do, of course, find cru-
derived directly from ethical commitments to ideas of just- cial bases of public health leadership such as the Academy
ice.2 As the field of public health ethics has emerged,3 it has of Medical Science’s ‘Improving the Health of the Public by
become clear that moral values, rationales, imperatives and 2040’.9 An important lesson to take from the above reflec-
constraints may be found in quite distinct sources: the ethics tions, though, and the exchanges on public health leadership,
of the profession itself; the ethics of advocacy for the pub- is that debates and practical argument are required on how
lic’s health; and from philosophical theory.4 It is clear, fur- we understand the substance and scope of ethical public
thermore, that given its focus on populations and on health agendas, recognizing both their inherently political
governmental and institutional power, public health ethics is nature and the wider social, political, and economic contexts
about politics.5 As suggested in the subtitle to Lawrence in which they exist. This means examining questions such
Gostin and Lindsay Wiley’s celebrated textbook on public as:
health law, attention must be paid to political and legal
‘power, duty and restraint’.6 Here in the UK, as elsewhere, • The substance of ethical public health goals: to what ends
we need to meet the challenge of establishing the contours should public health activity be directed?
of ethical public health practice and policy, and explain how • The means by which public health agendas should be
far public health ethics should bear on overall social and pol- achieved: what methods of intervention may, or may not,
itical agendas. be justified, and what further, non-health-related values
If public health is to provide a voice—to provide leader- might sometimes take precedence?
ship—political disagreement is inevitable. This is only heigh- • The reach of public health ethics: is an ethical mandate
tened in a context of increasing fiscal pressures on public from a public health perspective a compelling social and
health authorities, and concerns about the fragmentation of political mandate overall?
the public health workforce and its overall independence. • The relationship of public health practitioners, leaders and
Across the political spectrum, furthermore, we find an array advocates with communities and political agencies: what
of views of where public responsibilities begin and purely interests are being represented, and what is the right level
personal responsibilities end. Without an identifiable ethical of political independence?
core, public health becomes an eclectic range of technical • The need for ethics education and the development of
specialities, serving diverse technical, organizational, political, ethics as a competency: how do we understand such a
and corporate interests and outcomes. In a scathing com- competency, and how is it best promoted within the pub-
ment piece calling for stronger public health leadership, and lic health workforce?
criticizing the relationship of public health’s leadership with
government, Richard Horton wrote in 2011: We do not suggest that any of these questions will receive a
single, unanimously agreed answer. But consensus and lead-
There was a time when public health in England was dri- ership are needed where they can be found, and such ques-
ven by passionately articulated values and compelling tions must be visited and revisited as the political and social
research, a time when its leaders were concerned about landscapes change, and as public health emergencies and
social reform and political change. […] Public health is challenges arise. This editorial is a call to advance such

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 427

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article-abstract/39/3/427/4084674


by guest
on 19 December 2017
428 JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

discourse on public health ethics and law, with a view to pro- References
viding both a point of reflection and a call to action.
1 Thomas J, Sage M, Dillenberg J et al. Editorial—a code of ethics for
The Journal of Public Health is accordingly planning a spe-
Public Health. Am J Public Health 2002;92(7):1057–9.
cial section on the ethical foundations of public health ethics
2 Coggon J, Viens AM. Public Health Ethics in Practice: A background
and law, and the implications for policy and practice. paper on public health ethics for the UK Public Health Skills and Knowledge
Scholars, practitioners, leaders and policy makers are invited Framework. London: Public Health England, 2017.
to contribute articles, including research articles, perspec- 3 Dawson A, Verweij M. Public health ethics: a Manifesto. Public Health
tives, and Chekhov’s corner. If you wish to submit a piece, Ethics 2008;1(1):1–2.
you are encouraged to consult Farhang Tahzib, farhang. 4 Jennings B. Frameworks for ethics in public health. Acta Bioeth 2003;
tahzib@gmail.com, on your proposed submission. However, 9(2):165–76.
submissions will be made through the journal’s usual 5 Coggon J. What Makes Health Public? Cambridge: Cambridge
Manuscript Central portal, by 15 January 2018. University Press, 2012.
6 Gostin L, Wiley L. Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint, 3rd edn.
John Coggon1, Farhang Tahzib2 Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016.
1 7 Horton R. Offline: Where is public health leadership in England?
University of Bristol
2 Lancet 2011;378(9796):1060.
Public Heath Ethics Committee, Faculty of Public Health
8 Davies L, Atherton F, Karunanithi S et al. Correspondence—
Address correspondence to Farhang Tahzib, E-mail: farhang.
Leadership and public health. Lancet 2011;378(9805):1776.
tahzib@gmail.com.
9 Academy of Medical Sciences. Improving the Health of the Public by
2040. London: AMS, 2016.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article-abstract/39/3/427/4084674


by guest
on 19 December 2017

Вам также может понравиться