INTRODUCTION

Philosophy is an investigation that tries to comprehend the puzzles of presence and

reality. It tries to find the idea of truth and information and to discover what is of fundamental

esteem and significance throughout everyday life. It likewise looks at the connections among

humankind and nature and between the individual and society. Rationality emerges out of

ponder, interest, and the want to know and get it. Philosophy is consequently a type of request - a

procedure of examination, feedback, understanding, and hypothesis.

Philosophy is a certain piece of human presence. Nearly everybody has been confused

now and again by such basically thoughtful inquiries as "What does life signify?" "Did I have

any presence before I was conceived?" and "Is there eternal life?" Most individuals likewise have

some sort of theory in the feeling of an individual point of view. Indeed, even a man who

guarantees that considering rational inquiries is an exercise in futility is communicating what is

imperative, beneficial, or important. A dismissal of all theory is in itself reasoning. By

considering Philosophy, individuals can clear up what they accept, and they can be invigorated to

consider extreme inquiries. A man can ponder savants of the past to find why they thought as

they did and what esteem their considerations may have in one's own life. There are individuals

who just appreciate perusing the considerable rationalists, particularly the individuals who were

additionally awesome authors. Philosophy has had huge impact on our regular day to day

existences. The very dialect we talk utilizes groupings got from reasoning. For instance, the

arrangements of thing and verb include the thoughtful thought that there is a contrast among

things and activities. On the off chance that we ask what the distinction is, we are beginning a

rational request.
 BODY

What is Freedom? Is it outright right? On the off chance that we make this inquiry to

individuals around us, we will get around a hundred unique answers, in light of the fact that

everybody will comprehend this marvel in his or her own specific manner. Freedom can be

characterized beginning from various viewpoints, as indicated by various societies, from various

perspectives and even from various convictions. Everybody was conceived thoroughly free and

every one of them must have the privilege to live openly. In view of a few articles, we can see

that out there, individuals need to be free and autonomous from each other, however is this idea

conceivable and adequate by the general public?

Opportunity is the privilege to do what we need, live where we need, eat what we need,

realize what we need to realize, for instance we pick what religion we need to accept, without

thinking about others judgments! Truly, I don't know whether this in of right truly exists since we

were educated in a way where we are permitted to pick, yet toward the end somebody will carry

out that activity (picking) for us. So would we say we are extremely free?! Is it true that we are

following the meaning of "Opportunity"? As I would like to think, freedom is a nonattendance of

weight and requirement from other individuals, where individuals is allowed to do what laws and

social traditions don't deny. We can barely say that all social orders are free similarly.

By and by, I trust that we, Human creatures are God creatures. God is the person who

made us and gave us the privilege to life. As per the Bible, God began to make the sky and the

earth, at that point the morning and the night where He permitted the presence of life, beginning

from winged creatures to every one of the creatures and till the end the production of the Man,
called Adam. Since Adam was so alone, God chose to give him an organization, an accomplice.

In light of this, God made a general public for Humans and with it, we were instructed to obey

and take after tenets. Would we be able to attempt to envision what the world may transform into

if each one of us could do whatever we wanted without any restrictions and regard towards the

standards and others?

All through the ages, philosopher have examined the connection between the body and

the brain or soul. A few social orders were nauseated, troubled, undermined, energized or

threatened by the body.

Savants trust the body as any material question is with our discernment. Its fundamental

properties are the size, mass and invulnerability. Phenomenologists recognize the human body,

called body-subject, since it is identified with subjectivity. The exemplary inquiry is the

relationship of body and soul. A few, similar to Spinoza think this report in the method for

solidarity (monism), the other on the double mode (parallel)

The human body involves an uncertain, even a dumbfounding part in social

classifications — from the cosmologies of the bygone social orders to the ideas and practices of

current Western development. It is the most evident and commonplace noticeable 'thing' saw, but

has a tendency to vanish in the very demonstration of view of, or connection to, the outside

world. The vague idea of the body might be planned in various twofold restrictions. The body is

both the Same and the Other; both a subject and a protest of practices and learning; it is both a

device and a crude material to be worked upon. The body seems to sway amongst nearness and

nonattendance, most incomprehensibly in serious sentiments — sentiments as sensations and

emotions as feelings. The body is by all accounts at the same time the subject of very verbalized

expression but at ceaseless danger of vanishing from our mindfulness.

 As a component in social classifications, the part of the human body goes a long way past

its solid physical limits. It goes about as the fundamental model for cosmological plans. This is

evident in the unmistakable humanoid attribution of 'crude' cosmologies. Less clearly,

notwithstanding, it might be distinguished in the essential plan by which the request of the

outside world is identified with that of within in the macrocosm– microcosm demonstrate which

has been so focal in Western social custom since Greek artifact.

Inter-subjectivity is the center ground amongst objectivity and aggregate subjectivity.

Objectivity being a fact that isn't identified with the subject, though subjectivity is a reality that is

in respect to the viewpoint of a subject. Inter-subjectivity envelops various subjects and

numerous perspectives, that are in themselves subjective, however the blend of different

perspectives that point to the same "truth" enables subjectivity to not be totally subjective - in a

way that it is frequently utilized derogatively.

Thus, for instance, I see a huge green meteorite that tumbles toward the north of me.

Someone else sees an expansive meteorite that tumbled toward the south of her, a third

individual sees it tumble toward the east, and a fourth individual sees it tumble toward the west.

Presently, since we as a whole depict the meteorite as green we can inter-subjectively concur that

it was in reality green. In the meantime, we can analyze our individual areas at the time that the

star tumbled from the sky, and the bearing it showed up in from our areas, and with some level of

exactness we can inter-subjectively confirm that the meteorite ought to have fallen precisely

some place.

CONCLUSION
 In General, Philosophy is an incredible part in our day by day lives in can be seen or

thought on all that we do or think. Logical idea is a certain piece of human presence. Nearly

everybody has been perplexed now and again by such basically rational inquiries as "What does

life signify?" "Did I have any presence before I was conceived?" and "Is there post-existence?"

Most individuals additionally have some sort of reasoning in the feeling of an individual point of

view

By considering rationality, individuals can illuminate what they accept and they can be

empowered to consider extreme inquiries. A man can consider scholars of the past to find why

they thought as they did and what esteem their contemplations may have in one's own particular

life.