Mr. /Madame President, Your Excellencies, may it please this Honorable Court.

My name is
Mary Ann Bernadette Cafe, the agent of the Applicant in this case.

I will prove before this Court our last three submissions:

First, Reverentia’s sale to international market is in violation of the Marthite Convention

Second, Reverentia’s sabotage of the extraction facilities and other software of the
mining system

Third, the unlawful interference in Agnostica’s internal affairs and an act of aggression
against the Agnostica’s territory constitute a violation against international law.

First Argument

The State of Reverentia failed to comply with the provision provided under Article 4
(a) which provides that ‘except as permitted under article 4(d), Reverentia undertakes that RMT
will distribute Marthite only to traditional medicine practitioners in Reverentia and East
Agnostica. The international market sale of Reverentia violated the Convention.
The RMT’s act of international sale is invalid and impermissible. The Covenant does
not permit the sale outside Reverentia and Agnostica. Under Article 2 of the Responsibility of
the States Internationally Wrongful Acts.
Pursuant to Article 2 (b) of the Responsibility of the Sates Internationally Wrongful
Acts ‘there is an international wrongful act of a State when conduct consisting with an action or
omission, constitute a breach of international obligation of the State’. In this case, the
participation of Reverentia in international market constitutes a breach of obligation.
On the 13 paragraph of the record, the RMT sold Marthite to a pharmaceutical
companies that causes the shortages and increasing the price in the market. This subsequently
shows that the Reverentia constitute breach of the Convention.
Second Argument

The removal of the personnel in East Agnostica constitutes a violation provided for
Article 8 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of the States which
provides that ‘no state has the right to intervene in the internal and external affairs of the
other’.

On the 16 paragraph of the record, the Prime Minister Mortiz declares that the
Marthite Convention terminated and it was no longer subject to the Convention. The lease
between Baxter Enterprises is valid in compliance with the international law. The act of
Reverentia’s withdrawal of the personnel in the East Agnostica was intentional that
constitutes sabotage which violates the Article 8 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights
and Duties of the States. In the plight of this, it has crippled the Marthite operations.

The applicant respectfully submits, Your Excellencies, to help to us settle this dispute.
The Federal Republic of Agnostica has the moral obligations under international law to ensure
and provide a life-saving product and to alleviate the suffering of the children around the world.

Third Argument

The state of Reverentia violated the provision provided for under Article 2 (4) of the
United Nations Charter that ‘all members shall refrain in their international relations from the
threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in
any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations’.

On the 18 paragraph of the record, the Vice-President of Reverentia in his article in The
Reverentian Times, uses threat and force to reaffirm the Convention between Agnostica and
Reverentia. This is untenable and impermissible under the Article 2 (4) of the United Nations.
 Morever, the act of Reverentian Parliament Referendum is unlawful under Article 2
(4) of the United Nations Charter. The possible annexation of East Agnostica by Reverentia
would entail the risks of peace and stability of the state. The mineral resources are found in
Agnostica, it is where the core ingredient of the Reverentia traditional medicine and the
source of raw materials needed for the exporataton into Reverentia. The Agnorevs only took
advantage of the economic opportunities in Agnostica. It is our moral obligation to protect
and save the Marthite industry from individuals who are only after to the high profit made by
such instance.

Hence, to settle this dispute, we plead this Court to turn its eyes once again to the
atrocities brought about by the State of Reverentia. We ask this Honorable Court not to favor
us but to champion the dictates of justice, as it always has. If I may no longer be of
assistance, may it please this Honorable Court.