1 Public Notice , Affidavit of Dishonest including non-compliance by the judge

2 attorneys clerk, all elected and public servants with the 1938 FARA Mandatory
3 filling Perhaps the most important statute here is a largely obscure 1938 law, the
4 Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), All "public servants," officials,
5 Congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their
6 various agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals - see Foreign
7 Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii)
8 & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91
9
10
11 A must read learn the real truth about us,,,Nii Nee Lawful Bloodline lakota indians
12 native american all natives of ALL color 1778 Ratified Confirmed 1871 Contract with
13 the British Government the Vatican's and all Bibles first amendment of true mans
14 freedom forty eight state,, The constitution of thy ::us"" gives woman and man equal
15 rights ,,, the bible give man enslavement and ownership over woman, ., No freedom
16 from the foreign agents and all immigration must be mandatory registered 1938
17 FARA by the constitution law have to be registered
18
19
20 Presented by Native Nii Nee Injured Living man Non-corporation, Bloodline Native
21 American, Sovereign;
22 Crime Victim, Corpus Delicti (~18 U.S.C. § 3771)
23
24 Nii Nee- kidnap and held for ransom injured party inmate #249918
25 Saline County Jail
26 P.O. Box 1606 Salina, KS
27 67402-1606
28
29 corpus delicti 18 usc 3771 Nii Nee- kidnap and held for reason for elected and public
30 servants personal gain inmate #249918 has been Kidnap and held for ransom and
31 human trafficking profits for foreign agents and religious purposes of non compliance
32 to a proscribe foreign religion A “Statement“ is an admission of Facts therein
33 asserted, and is substantive evidence of the Facts to which it relates, if believed by the
34 trier of Fact. Aide V. Taylor. 7 N.W. 2d, 757, 759, 214 Minn. 212, 145 A.L.R. 530.
35 “Statement” is act of stating, reciting, or presenting verbally or on paper. Harrison v.
36 State, 147 N.E. 650, 654, 112 Ohio St. 429.
37
38
39
40 Public NOTICE:
41
42 It is a crime for any government office or any official to auction or otherwise sell in
43 any way, private or business property of any individual WITHOUT FIRST HAVING
44 DUE PROCESS OF LAW, to determine the cause of action and the recourse in law.
45 The sale of any property outside this means is illegal, and all those involved with such
46 a sale, including those purchasing said property, are personally liable for damages,
47 and subject to criminal charges under Racketeering (RIC...O) laws, and for violation
48 of civil and Due Process rights. All government officials have the "Greater Duty" to
49 know the law and comply with it, and if you are involved with such an auction
50 without Due Process for the owner, you are in breach of your fiduciary duty and you

1
 51 can be held personally liable by those harmed by this fraud. Any challenge to property
52 taxation or property sale made by any citizen requires you to respond, point by point,
53 and to "prove up" your position in law.
54
55 Whereas : In Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), we held that "the fundamental
56 constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inmates
57 in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with
58 adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law."
59
60
61 whereas : U.S. 605
62 The Foreign Agents Registration Act was first enacted by Congress on June 8, 1938.
63 It required agents of foreign principals to register with the Secretary of State.' '(A)gent
64 of a foreign principal' was defined as 'any person who acts or engages or agrees to act
65 as a public-relations counsel, publicity agent, or as agent, servant, representative, or
66 attorney for a foreign principal * * *.' 52 Stat. 631, 632. (Emphasis added.) 'Foreign
67 principal' was defined as 'the government of a foreign country, a political party of a
68 foreign country, a person domiciled abroad, or any foreign business, partnership,
69 association, corporation, or political organization * * *.' Exempted from the
70 definition
71 of 'agent of a foreign principal' was 'a person, other than a public-relations counsel, or
72 publicity agent, performing only private, non-political, financial, mercantile, or other
73 activities in furtherance of the bona fide trade or commerce of such foreign principal.'
74 52 Stat. 631, 632. (Emphasis added.) In 1961, the exemption section was amended to
75 7 apply to persons 'engaging or agreeing to engage only in private 301 and
76 non-political,
77 302 financial or mercantile activities in furtherance of the bona fide trade or
78 commerce of
79 303 such foreign principal
80
81 Whereas :
82 OMB No. 1124-0005; Expires May 31, 2020
83 U.S. Department of Justice
84 Short Form Registration Statement
85 Washington, DC 20530
86 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of
87 1938, as amended
88
89 https://www.fara.gov/forms/2017/OMB_1124_0005.pdf
90
91
92 Office of the Assistant Attorney General
93 https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2016-09-01%20DOJ%20to%20CEG
94 %20(FARA%20Follow%20Up).pdf
95
96 2062. Foreign Agents Registration Act Enforcement
97 https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2062-foreign-agents-registrat
98 ion-act-enforcement
99 “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords
100 no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as

2
101 though it had never been passed. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
102 “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution
103 without violating his undertaking to support it.” The constitutional theory is that we
104 the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents.”
105 “Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker or
106 jurisdiction is the issue.” Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622
107
108 WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity (See, Owen vs. City of
109 Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs.
110 Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to
111 uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful
112 deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen
113 cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as
114 ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance
115 of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights
116 secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec.
117 1983. Notice it says Constitution "for" the United States of America.
118
119
120 Whereas : The United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case, as settled
121 by courts of one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states; state courts
122 may not reopen cases which have been conclusively decided by the courts of another
123 state. Later, Chief Justice John Marshall suggested that the judgment of one state
124 court must be recognized by other states' courts as final. Mills v. Duryee, 1t1 U.S. (7
125 Cranch) 481 (1813).
126
127 Whereas : .Original ratified Amendment 13, dates back to 1812-1818, and I have 4
128 original volumes in my possession showing the ORIGINAL 13th printed in Mass.
129 1822, Conn. 1835, & more. So all the above crap about Anti-slavery so called
130 "Thirteenth Amendment of 1865" is just that ... Long ROTTING CRAP. It was in fact
131 mis-numbered intentionally and should have been the 14th. Lincoln was soon
132 assassinated and few cared about the NUMBER of an Amendment that could only be
133 passed after a CIVIL WAR. My 4 volumes are ORIGINALS, not reprints or copies.
134 They are almost 200 years old and were the respective states OWN official
135 records.13th Amendment ratified - Dec 06, 1865 -
136 HISTORY.com www.history.com/this-day-in-history/13th-amendment-ratified On
137 this day in History, 13th Amendment ratified on Dec 06, 1865. Learn more about
138 what happened today on History. Original 13th Amendment Testimony in New
139 Hampshire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9SXU_I1nIY
140
141
142 A government official, officer or clerk shall lose their bond, shall not be bonded, and
143 shall be deemed unbondable:
144 1. if he fails to answer, or fails to require an answer to, a citizen’s complaint, and
145 affidavit of information categorically point for-point, except that, where criminal
146 accusations are made, he shall have the right to remain silent, or allow silence
147 (non-answer) as a protection against selfincrimination. Otherwise, the ordinary rule is,
148 “An affidavit unrebutted stands as the truth.”
149 2. If he knowingly imprisons, or keeps as a prisoner, a citizen in violation of that
150 citizen’s U.S. constitutionally secured rights and equal protection of the law. The

3
151 offense shall repeat the application of pertinent remedy statutes each and every
152 twenty-four(24) hours.
153 3. if he refuses a prisoner the materials and information necessary for the prisoner to
154 defend, acquit or vindicate himself. The offense shall repeat the application of the
155 pertinent remedy statutes each and every twenty-four (24) hours.
156 NOTE: If an officer or clerk who has lost his bond, gives aid and comfort to a citizen
157 or to a prisoner deprived as described under this chapter, and shall prove himself
158 genuine, the same shall recover his bondability.
159 In all complaints of a citizen against a public law enforcement officer, the
160 complaining citizen has the general responsibility of protecting the general
161 enforcement of the laws by giving every opportunity of grace and escape to the officer
162 complained about. The complainant must always remain sensitive to the fact that a
163 law enforcement officer is constantly subject to the most psychologically demanding
164 emergency situations and the most dangerous social combinations, and must be given
165 every benefit of the doubt so that he can survive his daily work
166 ~~~~~~~~~~
167 According to The constitutional law , Declaration of Independence, Bill of rights I am
168 endowed by my Creator with these as "unalienable" rights. In other words, these
169 rights can not be taken away.
170 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
171
172 whereas : Nii Nee was denied When he got kidnap and held for ransom, arrested did
173 they take you immediately before a magistrate like the law says???? NO they took
174 you to book you...well guess what that's not proper and you were falsely imprisoned...
175 Check this out...
176 Go immediately to a magistrate (no photographs, no fingerprinting)
177 “The one arresting has “a duty to immediately seek a magistrate,” and failure to do so
178 “makes a case of false imprisonment.” Heath v. Boyd, 175 S.W.2d. 217 (1943); Brock
179 v. Stimson, 108 Mass. 520 (1871).
180 “To detain the person arrested in custody for any purpose other than that of taking
181 him before a magistrate is illegal.” Kominsky v. Durand, 12 Atl.2d. 654 (1940).
182 “Any undue delay is unlawful and wrongful, and renders the officer himself and all
183 persons aiding and abetting therein wrongdoers from the beginning.” Ulvestad v.
184 Dolphin, 278 Pac. 684 (1929).
185 “The taking of the plaintiff’s picture before conviction was an illegal act.”Hawkins v.
186 Kuhne, 137 NY Supp 1090, 153 App Div 216 (1912).
187 “The power to arrest does not confer upon the arresting officer the power to detain a
188 prisoner for other purposes.” Geldon v. Finnegan, 252 N.W. 372 (1934).
189 “Compulsory fingerprinting before conviction is an unlawful encroachment…[and]
190 involves prohibited compulsory self-incrimination.” People v. Helvern, 215 N.Y.
191 Supp. 417 (1926)
192 Summary
193
194
195
196 The Foreign Agents Registration Act is a United States law (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.)
197 passed in 1938 requiring that agents representing the interests of foreign powers be
198 properly identified to the American public.[1] The act was passed in response to
199 German propaganda in the lead-up to World War II. The Foreign Agent Registration
200 Unit within the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is charged with

4
201 handling the enforcement of the law.
202 The act requires people and organizations that are under foreign control ("agents of a
203 foreign principal") to register with the Department of Justice when acting on behalf of
204 foreign interests. This law defines the agent of a foreign principal as someone who:
205
206 1. Engages in political activities for or in the interests of a foreign principal;
207 2. Acts in a public relations capacity for a foreign principal;
208 3. Solicits or dispenses any thing of value within the United States for a foreign
209 principal;
210 4. Represents the interests of a foreign principal before any agency or official of the
211 U.S. government.[1]
212
213 The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) was enacted in 1938. FARA is a
214 disclosure statute that requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a
215 political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their
216 relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and
217 disbursements in support of those activities. Disclosure of the required information
218 facilitates evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements
219 and activities of such persons in light of their function as foreign agents. The FARA
220 Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security
221 Division (NSD) is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act.
222
223 Take Mandatory Judicial Notice and Cognizance ( Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (d)
224 that “plaintiff” ie Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without cost, based upon the
225 following law:
226
227
228 Agents of foreign principals
229
230 Any agent of a person described in section 611(b)(2) of this title or an entity described
231 in section 611(b)(3) of this title if the agent has engaged in lobbying activities and has
232 registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 [2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] in
233 connection with the agent’s representation of such person or entity.
234 (June 8, 1938, ch. 327, § 3, 52 Stat. 632; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 521, § 2, 53 Stat. 1245;
235 Apr. 29, 1942, ch. 263, § 1, 56 Stat. 254; Pub. L. 87–366, § 2, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat.
236 784; Pub. L. 89–486, § 3, July 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 246; Pub. L. 104–65, § 9(2), (3), Dec.
237 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 700; Pub. L. 105–166, § 5, Apr. 6, 1998, 112 Stat. 39.)
238
239 18 U.S. Code § 219 - Officers and employees acting as agents of...
240 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/219
241 Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required
242 to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 or a lobbyist ...
243
244
245 Five copy's each need to be made..Short Form Registration Statement Pursuant to the
246 Foreign Agents...https://www.fara.gov/forms/2017/OMB_1124_0005.pdf
247 Whereas : Office of the Assistant Attorney General
248 https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2016-09-01%20DOJ%20to%20CE
249 G%20(FARA%20Follow%20Up).pdf
250

5
251 www.justice.gov/doj/resource/short-form-registration-statement-pursuant-foreign-age
252 nts-registration-act-1938
253
254 Jun 13, 2017 ... Short Form Registration Statement Pursuant to the Foreign Agents
255 Registration Act of 1938. Component: National Security Division (NSD).
256
257 Whereas : The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) was enacted in 1938. FARA
258 is a disclosure statute that requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a
259 political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their
260 relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and
261 disbursements in support of those activities. Disclosure of the required information
262 facilitates evaluation by the government and the American people of the statements
263 and activities of such persons in light of their function as foreign agents. The FARA
264 Registration Unit of the Counterespionage Section (CES) in the National Security
265 Division (NSD) is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Act.
266
267 America is under a Foreign Occupation. All "public servants," officials, Congressmen,
268 politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various
269 agencies, etc., are the express agents of these foreign principals - see Foreign Agents
270 Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii);
271 Treasury Delegation Order #91
272
273 A “Statement“ is an admission of Facts therein asserted, and is substantive evidence
274 of the Facts to which it relates, if believed by the trier of Fact. Aide V. Taylor. 7 N.W.
275 2d, 757, 759, 214 Minn. 212, 145 A.L.R. 530.
276 “Statement” is act of stating, reciting, or presenting verbally or on paper. Harrison v.
277 State, 147 N.E. 650, 654, 112 Ohio St. 429.
278
279 Take Mandatory Judicial Notice and Cognizance ( Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (d)
280 that “plaintiff” ie Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without cost, based upon the
281 following law:
282
283 The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled
284 to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State of the Union(2
285 Black 620, see also Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Plaintiff (libellant) should not be
286 charged fees or costs for the lawful and Constitutional Right to petition this court in
287 this matter in which he/she is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was
288 originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied
289 to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201
290 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715;
291 and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent
292 non- lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in
293 court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
294 Petitioner (libellant) cannot be charged a fee as no charge can be placed upon a citizen
295 as a condition precedent to exercise his/her Constitutional Rights, his/her rights
296 secured by the Constitution. A fee is a charge “fixed by law for services fixed by
297 public officers or for use of a privilege under control of government.” Fort Smith Gas
298 Co. v Wisemen” 189 Ark.675 74 SW.2d 789,790, from Black’s Law Dictionary 5th
299 Ed.
300

6
301
302
303 Whereas : SECTION 23-17-90. Illegal arrest.
304
305 If any sheriff or deputy sheriff, without writ, warrant or process, shall summon
306 anyone by arresting the person or attaching the goods to appear in any of the courts of
307 this State, not having at that time any process to justify such summons, upon
308 complaint thereof, on oath, such sheriff or deputy shall be liable to be punished for a
309 contempt by either the court of common pleas or general sessions for his county. But
310 nothing herein contained shall prevent the sheriff or his deputy from arresting any
311 person for treason, felony or breach of the peace committed in his presence or from
312 arresting any person for treason or felony upon probable and reasonable grounds.
313 STATE v. McATEER | FindLaw
314 caselaw.findlaw.com/sc-court-of-appeals/1049306.html
315
316 McAteer argued the arrest was illegal because Officer Thompson had no police ...
317 McAteer argues that S.C.Code Ann. section 17-13-10 sets out the complete law .....
318 peace); S.C.Code Ann. § 23-17-90 (1989) (Sheriff or deputy arresting without ..
319
320 DETENTION WITHOUT A WARRANT
321 When an individual is detained, without warrant and without having committed a
322 crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a false arrest and unlawful
323 imprisonment:
324 DAMAGES AWARDED
325 TREZEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA,741 F2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984) "Motorist illegally
326 held for 23 minutes on a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in damages."
327
328 This may be even MORE applicable to those traveling with PRIVATE plates on their
329 cars. since a cop had no probable cause to stop you, as you didn't have STATE plates,
330 which ARE evidence that the car IS subject to Public Policy. and so engaged in
331 COMMERCE, which is justly regulated by the State.
332
333 I.e. in order for a cop to detain you, there has to be AT LEAST a suspicion of criminal
334 activity (Terry v Ohio), and having private plates can't be interpreted as such IMO,
335 while having State license plate signals the cop that you're engaged in COMMERCE,
336 and so you can be pulled over for any traffic violation.
337 which has already come up Injured party , true victim living man Nii Nee lawful
338 bloodline native american
339
340 18 U.S. Code Chapter 93 - PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ...
341 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-93
342
343 18 U.S. Code Chapter 93 - PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ... Nepotism in
344 appointment of receiver or trustee · § 1911 - Receiver mismanaging property ...
345
346 1638. Embezzlement Of Government Property -- 18 U.S.C. § 641 ...
347 ://www.justice.gov/.../criminal-resource-manual-1638...
348
349 There are six elements to the crime of embezzlement, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 641.
350 These are: (1) a trust or fiduciary relationship between the defendant and ...

7
351 1643. Definition -- Property Protected By 18 U.S.C. 641 | USAM...
352 ://www.justice.gov/.../criminal-resource-manual-1643...
353
354 Generally, jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 641 turns on the nature of the government's
355 interest in the property which has been stolen. If that interest is sufficient, ...
356 18 U.S.C. 641 - Public money, property or records
357 ://www.gpo.gov/.../USCODE-2011.../content-detail.html
358
359 Jan 3, 2012 ... Sec. 665 - Theft or embezzlement from employment and training funds;
360 improper inducement; obstruction of... PDF | Text | More ...
361 8.39 Theft of Government Money or Property | Model Jury...
362 www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/497
363
364 8.39 THEFT OF GOVERNMENT MONEY OR PROPERTY (18 U.S.C. § 641). The
365 defendant is charged in [Count ______ of] the indictment with theft of ...
366 Is a 18 usc section 641 a felony or misdemeanor, is it also
367 ://www.justanswer.com/.../4r8pr-18-usc-section-641-felony...
368
369 Federal law, in 18 U.S.C. 3553, defines crimes as felonies or misdemeanors based on
370 the penalties involved. As relates to 18 U.S.C. 641, it says: ...
371
372 5 USC § 3331 Oath of office: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
373 support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
374 and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this
375 obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will
376 well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So
377 help me God.”
378
379 U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 81 › § 1660 Receipt of pirate property
380 Whoever, without lawful authority, receives or takes into custody any vessel, goods,
381 or other property, feloniously taken by any robber or pirate against the laws of the
382 United States, knowing the same to have been feloniously taken, shall be imprisoned
383 not more than ten years.
384 US Constitution Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil
385 Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and
386 Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
387 All civil officers are impeachable for crimes committed against me. Anything over 5
388 days in jail is also removal from office. It is a high crime to commit a WAR crimes by
389 color of an unlawful office.
390 Under the "Nuremberg defense". Defendants were “only following orders" which
391 specifically stated that following an unlawful (Unconstitutional) order is not a valid
392 defense against charges of war crimes.
393 TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1983
394 Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
395
396 Federal Law also prohibits Cities and Counties from issuing citations against
397 businesses, see Title 18 U.S.C.891-896, quoting Section 891 "An extortionate means
398 is any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of
399 violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property."
400

8
401 Whereas: corpus delicti 18 usc 3771 Nii Nee injured . EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
402 To state a claim for the tort of outrage or intentional infliction of emotional distress, a
403 plaintiff must show "(1) extreme and outrageous conduct; (2) intentional or reckless
404 infliction of emotional distress; and (3) actual result to the plaintiff of severe
405 emotional distress." Birklid v. Boeing Co., 127 Wn.2d 853, 867, 904 P.2d 278 (1995)
406 (quoting Dicomes v. State, 113 Wn.2d 612, 630, 782 P.2d 1002 (1989) (quoting Rice
407 v. Janovich, 109 Wn.2d 48, 61, 742 P.2d 1230 (1987)).
408
409 Seaman v. Karr, 114 Wn. App. 665, 684 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002)
410
411
412 Whereas :
413 The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3,
414 Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in
415 which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and
416 uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks,
417 benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of
418 Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the
419 Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10
420 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F.
421 Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live
422 by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating
423 their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a
424 federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided
425 into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for
426 purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office
427 members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333
428 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office
429 required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during
430 their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which
431 explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for
432 anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress)
433 to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”
434
435
436 Whereas: and to clarify America is under a Foreign 1871 British Vatican contract
437 Occupation. All "public servants," officials, Congressmen, politicians, judges,
438 attorneys, law enforcement officers, States and their various agencies, etc., are the
439 express agents of these foreign principals - see Foreign Agents Registration Act of
440 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq, 263A, 185G, 267J, 611(C) (ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation
441 Order #91
442
443
444 A “Statement“ is an admission of Facts therein asserted, and is substantive evidence
445 of the Facts to which it relates, if believed by the trier of Fact. Aide V. Taylor. 7 N.W.
446 2d, 757, 759, 214 Minn. 212, 145 A.L.R. 530.
447 “Statement” is act of stating, reciting, or presenting verbally or on paper. Harrison v.
448 State, 147 N.E. 650, 654, 112 Ohio St. 429.
449
450 Whereas : Constitution lawful bloodline Americans only..,,,...Federal Immigration and

9
451 Nationality Act
452 Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) original 1774 do you research
453 8 USC 1324a: Unlawful employment of aliens Text contains those laws in ... For
454 purposes of this section, a person or other entity who uses a contract, ... For purposes
455 of paragraphs (1)(B) and (3), a person or entity shall be ..... (b)(2), (5), ( d)(2)(F), (G),
456 and (h)(3), was in the original, "this Act", meaning act June 27, 1952, ch.
457
458 "If money is wanted by rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they
459 may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief,
460 without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility." Journals of
461 the Continental Congress. 26 October, 1774©1789. Journals 1: 105©1
462
463
464
465 Whereas :Treaty Laws,
466
467 42 U.S. Code § 1996 - Protection and preservation of traditional...
468 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1996
469
470 ... use and possession of sacred objects, and the freedom to worship through
471 ceremonials and traditional rites. (Pub. L. 95–341, § 1, Aug. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 469.).
472 American Indian Religious Freedom Act - Wikipedia
473 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_Religious_Freedom_Act
474
475 The American Indian Religious Freedom Act, Public Law No. 95-341, 92 Stat. 469
476 (Aug. 11, 1978) (commonly abbreviated to AIRFA), codified at 42 U.S.C. ..
477
478 Because artificial entities cannot take oaths, they cannot make affidavits. See, e.g., In
479 re Empire Refining Co., 1 F. Supp. 548, 549 (SD Cal. 1932) ("It is, of course,
480 conceded that a corporation cannot make an affidavit in its corporate name. It is an
481 inanimate thing incapable of voicing an oath"); Moya Enterprises, Inc. v. Harry
482 Anderson Trucking, Inc., 162 Ga. App. 39, 290 S.E.2d 145 (1982); Strand Restaurant
483 Co. v. Parks Engineering Co., 91 A.2d 711 (D.C. 1952); 9A T. Bjur C. Slezak,
484 Fletcher Cyclopedia of Law of Private Corporations § 4629 (Perm. ed. 1992) ("A
485 document purporting to be the affidavit of a corporation is void, since a corporation
486 cannot make a sworn statement") (footnote omitted).ROWLAND v. CALIFORNIA
487 MEN'S COLONY•506 U.S. 194, 203 (1993)PENAL CODE
488
489 TITLE 7. OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY
490
491 CHAPTER 31. THEFT includes human body's as well
492
493 Sec. 31.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
494
495
496 Whereas :
497 Misconduct in office occurs when duties imposed by law have not been properly and
498 faithfully discharged. State v. Furey, (N.J.), 128 N.J. Super. 12, 318 A.2d 783; State v.
499 Begyn, (N.J.), 34 N.J. 35, 167 A.2d 161, 165, 168. The existence of a duty owed to
500 the public is essential, for otherwise the offending behavior becomes merely the

10
501 private misconduct of one who happens to be an official. State v. Weleck, (N.J.), 10
502 N.J. 355, 91 A.2d 751, 756.
503
504 State v. Hess, 279 S.C. 14, 20 (S.C. 1983)
505
506
507 1) When you get a LEGAL TITLE from the State, you become a TRUSTEE, while
508 the State HOLDS the EQUITABLE INTEREST in the Trust.
509 2) When it comes to 14th Am. US citizenship, "US citizen" is the LEGAL TITLE,
510 and a copy of a Birth Certificate is evidence of that title.
511 3) So to extinguish the US citizenship Trust, one has to SURRENDER the legal title
512 (US citizenship), by means of returning the Birth Certificate to the Vital Records
513 Bureau. TOLD YOU, that's how it's done.
514 4) BUT the US citizenship trust may NOT be revokable, in which case you gotta
515 CLAIM MISTAKE. I.e. challenge the State's CLAIM that you were born under the
516 jurisdiction of United States, by claiming a birth in a state of the Union. TOLD YOU,
517 that's how it's done.
518
519
520 COURTS and the 14th Amendment and the SPECIFIC JURISDICTIONS.....
521
522
523 The first thing that you are missing is that the Courts that we currently get dragged
524 into are Not Courts of Justice, but rather, are Article ONE Administrative Courts.
525 They are mainly Private Law Federal Courts working under Martial Law per the
526 General Orders 100 with certain Adjustments from Treaties made and the
527 biggest and worst of those Treaties is the U.N. Charter, and most definitely
528 the Naturalization Clause of the 14th Amendment, and THAT is exactly what places
529 them under Article One, and makes them into ADMINISTRATIVE Courts. It is very
530 important that you get these finer points FIRST.
531 As a U.S. citizen, you have been tricked via the lie...""Everyone does it"" or the
532 other lie, ""Everyone has to"" or the even bigger lie, ""It's your Right to"", and so
533 you went and registered your BODY with the State Government as a FEDERAL
534 Citizen. I reference the 14th Amendment Naturalization Clause to clarify your Legal
535 Status as a Naturalized Federal Government U.S. Citizen, but the only thing the Fed
536 Gov has power over are listed in the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
537 Combine those two and the lowest possible denominator is that You have been
538 walked/tricked, into claiming to be a Corporation, by Friends, Family, Teachers,
539 local Police, Mayors, Senators etc.
540 Why else does it seem like they are jumping from one Jurisdiction to another then
541 back and then to a third, or it looks like Admiralty Law(Law of the High Seas), and
542 then it looks like Common Law?
543 Have you asked yourself that question?
544 Well it is because you are not IN an Article 3 Court of Justice because You
545 removed yourself from being what they know is an Article 4 Section 2 State citizen,
546 where Common Law is the only Law.
547 How?
548 Upon Registration to Vote and/or for the Draft you had to make a claim of Nationality,
549 there are only two choices,
550 [] 1. U.S. Citizen

11
551 [] 2. Other
552 Do you recall which one you chose?
553 "Other" is the one that may not Vote in any elections and is not Represented at all in
554 the Federal Government. Other is the one that does have access to the Article 3
555 Constitutional Courts of Justice.
556 There are very very few Americans left in the category of "Other". They are mainly
557 the Amish, and those who are rich enough to afford to correctly Change their Status
558 via 15 Stats at Large 249. And those that have either luckily figured it out and done
559 it for themselves, those that have joined an already established Group that has all
560 this knowledge, and those like me, who have followed all the clues and compiled
561 the data one little piece at a time, most of these you already know of as State
562 Nationals, or Natives of a State or State citizens, or even Domestic Aliens. and some
563 few other fringe things.
564 But the Main one that is NOT part of that, is the "Sovereign Citizens" because they,
565 the "Sovereign Citizens", love to take one piece of solid data and then play mix n
566 match with shit from the UCC and they write up their own paperwork, then
567 they'll Notarize it for themselves, and present it as real evidence in these courts.
568 And then when their paperwork doesn’t fly, they claim to be VICTIMS of a corrupt
569 System.
570
571 Whereas :
572 The mother allegedly abandons the child at birth as the Informant on the
573 CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH so, the 'State' (attorneys) "pick you up" and assume
574 ownership and control over your body while your STRAW NAME remains on file at
575 the STATE REGISTRAR'S OFFICE. Under the the Doctrine of parens patriae, "The
576 STATE is your daddy". This is why CPS and DCF AGENTS are dispatched. They
577 show up to claim their property. When the "STATE" becomes dissatisfied with your
578 parenting skills or someone makes a phone call against you to an AGENT for the
579 oppressive STATE, your child is taken. They come and take your child as part of a
580 for-profit venture and modus operandi. The BAR attorneys want you to pay into the
581 system to support their crooked attorney FIRM, support the BAR Association and pay
582 the bankers fees in the CORPORATE COURTS.
583
584 Citizenship": Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the
585 question, "Are you a United States incorporation Democratic democracy British
586 Vatican treaty of 1213 religious slave citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my
587 status as a sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because
588 without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed
589 "citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature given freely without
590 misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no binding contract.
591
592 I am not a "United States citizen." I am not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a
593 "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or
594 "subject to the jurisdiction of" any "monarch" or any corporate "commonwealth,"
595 "federal," "state," "territory," "county," "council," "city," "municipal body politic," or
596 other "government" allegedly "created" under the "authority" of a "constitution" or
597 other "enactment." I am not subject to any "legislation," department, or agency
598 created by such "authorities," nor to the "jurisdiction" of any employees, officers, or
599 agents deriving their "authority" therefrom. Nor do any of the "statutes" or
600 "regulations" of such "authorities" apply to me or have any "jurisdiction" over me.

12
601 Further, I am not a subject of any "courts" or bound by "precedents" of any "courts,"
602 deriving their "jurisdiction" from said "authorities."Take notice that I hereby cancel
603 and make void from the beginning any such "instrument" or any presumed "election"
604 made by any "government" or any agency or department thereof, that I am or ever
605 have voluntarily elected to be treated as a subject of any "monarch" or as a citizen," or
606 a "resident" of any "commonwealth," "state," "territory," "possession,"
607 "instrumentality," "enclave," "division," "district," or "province," subject to their
608 "jurisdiction(s)."
609 10. "Constitution":The document supposedly setting forth the foundations of a
610 "country" and "its" "government," has no inherent authority or obligation. A
611 "constitution" has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between two or
612 more individuals, and then it is limited only to those individuals who have specifically
613 entered into it. At most, such a document could be a contract between the existing
614 people at the time of its creation, but no-one has the right, authority, or power to bind
615 their posterity. I have not knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally entered into any
616 such "constitution" contract to oblige myself thereby, therefore such a document is
617 inapplicable to me, and anyone claiming to derive their "authority" from such a
618 document has no "jurisdiction" over me.
619 11. Use of semantics: There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such
620 as the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as "government," and call
621 the noises and scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens "the law" which
622 "must be obeyed." Just because they alter definitions of words in their "law" books to
623 their supposed advantage, doesn't mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they
624 define the words "person," "address," "mail," "resident," "motor vehicle," "driving,"
625 "passenger," "employee," "income," and many others, in ways different from the
626 common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in
627 real life.
628 Because the "courts" have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to
629 all "courts" and all parties, that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any
630 words on record, using words defined by twists in any "law" books different from the
631 common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my sovereign status in society
632 thereby, nor can there be created any "obligation" to perform in any manner, by the
633 mere use of such words. Where the definition in the common dictionary differs from
634 the definition in the "law" dictionary, it is the definition in the common dictionary that
635 prevails, because it is more trustworthy.
636 Such compelled and supposed "benefits" include, but are not limited to, the
637 aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged "benefits" is under duress
638 only, and is with full reservation of all my natural inherent rights. I have waived none
639 of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such
640 compelled "benefits" may be temporary, until alternatives become available, practical,
641 and widely recognized.
642
643 REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
644 I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning, all powers of
645 attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in "law" or otherwise, signed either by me or
646 anyone else, as it pertains to any "tax file/identification number" and/or "social
647 security number" assigned to me, as it pertains to my "birth certificate," and as it
648 pertains to any and all other numbers, "licenses," "certificates," and other
649 "instruments" issued by any and all "government" and quasi-"governmental"
650 departments or agencies, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies

13
651 to attempt to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or property.
652 I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged
653 "benefit" or "gratuity" associated with any of the aforementioned numbers, "licenses,"
654 "certificates," and other "instruments." My use of any such numbers, "licenses,"
655 "certificates," or other "instruments" has been for information purposes only, and does
656 not grant any "jurisdiction" to anyone.
657 I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by
658 me or otherwise, implied in "law" or otherwise, with or without my consent or
659 knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or
660 incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute owner
661 and possess allodial title to any and all such property.
662 Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers
663 of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else,
664 claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney
665 pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all
666 quasi/colorable, public, "governmental" departments, agencies or corporations on the
667 grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.
668
669 Every State law must conform in the first place to the Constitution of the United
670 States, and then to the subordinate constitutions of the particular state; and if it
671 infringes upon the provisions of either, it is so far void.” Houston v. Moore, 18 US 1,
672 5 L.Ed 19 (1840). It is abiding truth that “nothing can destroy a government more
673 quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter
674 of its own existence.” Mapp v. Ohio,367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961). HARRIS V. NEW
675 YORK U.S. Supreme Court·401 U.S. 222 (1971).
676
677
678 Whereas : US cops seized more property than criminals stole in 2014 – FBI
679 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYTdkSH9inM
680
681 "PEOPLE COMPELLED TO FILE INCOME TAXES VIOLATES THE 5TH
682 AMENDMENT" Supreme Court ruled that income taxes constitute the compelled
683 testimony of a witness: "The information revealed in the preparation and filing of an
684 income tax return is, for the purposes of Fifth Amendment analysis, the testimony of a
685 witness." "Government compels the filing of a return much as it compels,for example,
686 the appearance of a 'witness' before a grand jury." Garner v. United States, 424 U.S.
687 648 (1975). :. Established that wages and income are NOT equivalent as far as taxes
688 on income are concerned. "Decided cases have made the distinction between wages
689 and income and have refused to equate the two in withholding or similar controversies.
690 Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 21(1978); Peoples Life
691 Ins. Co. v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 318, 332, 373 F.2d 924, 932 (1967); Humble
692 Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 944, 950, 442 F.2d 1353, 1356 (1971);
693 Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States, 194 Ct. Cl. 920, 442 F.2d 1362 (1971);
694 Stubbs, Overbeck & Associates v. United States, 445 F.2d 1142 (CA5 1971); Royster
695 Co. v. United States, 479 F.2d, at 390; (4th Cir. 1973); Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co. v.
696 United States, 272 F. Supp. 188 (Md. 1967). Supreme Court ruled that: "Waivers of
697 Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent
698 acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences.":
699 Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970) (a) not effectively connected with the
700 conduct of a “trade or business” (public office per 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26)) in the

14
701 United States (government),
702 (b) not earned from sources within the geographical federal 5 territory. See
703 Newman-Green v. Alfonso Larrain, 490 U.S. 826 (1989) “United States” defined in
704 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10),
705 (c) not subject to reporting per 26 U.S.C. §6041 because not connected to a statutory
706 “trade or business” (public office)
707 (d) not subject to withholding because not statutory “income” per 26 U.S.C. §643(b)
708 and earned by a “non-resident non-person
709 non-taxpayer http://new.oregontrackers.com/home.html
710
711
712
713
714 How to know the Differences Between
715 British Statutes, Regulations, Ordinances and Common Law is for maritime British
716 religion law judges from 1938 foreign agents registration act agents
717
718 Citizens and Nationals by executive order 2040 are subject to a variety of laws made
719 by city, county, state and federal governments. In general, all laws are part of a
720 hierarchy in which federal laws are at the top, local laws at the bottom, and state laws
721 somewhere in between. In order for individuals to work effectively on behalf of
722 animals, it is important to understand how these acting laws or Statutes codes and
723 administration rule of thee foreigner agents fit together. A brief summary follows of
724 each of the different kinds of laws, with an explanation of how they are interrelated.
725 (Please note that the 1776 1778 ratified Constitution true law applies to all lawful
726 bloodline Americans Tribal lands are sovereign nations, each with their own sets of
727 Native laws.) I dont participate with the devil foreign agents book call the bible is
728 from England not American
729
730 Statutes
731
732 The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land. No federal or state law
733 may violate it. Federal laws (statutes), enacted by the United States Congress, must be
734 followed by every state in the country. If a state law contradicts a federal law, the
735 federal statute preempts the state law, and the state will be required to abide by the
736 federal statute. However, federal laws do not cover all areas of the law, and in those
737 instances, state or local laws will control.
738
739 Similarly, within a state, the state constitution represents the highest legal authority.
740 The state may then enact state statutes, which apply to everyone within the state. State
741 statutes cannot violate the state constitution, the federal constitution, or federal law.
742
743 The term “statute” simply refers to a law enacted by a legislative body of a
744 government, whether federal or state. At the federal level, statutes regarding animals
745 usually focus on the interstate aspects of our relationships to animals. Protection of
746 migratory birds, for example, or the importation, interstate transportation and sale of
747 endangered animals are covered by federal statutes.
748
749 The states have the authority to regulate animals within their borders. Wildlife is
750 considered to be held in public trust by a state for the benefit of its citizens. Each state

15
751 may enact laws to govern how its wildlife is used, protected, etc. Domestic animals
752 are privately owned, and are generally considered to be property under state law. A
753 state may enact laws to govern how these animals are bought and sold. A state may
754 also enact laws for the benefit of public health and welfare, which govern how
755 animals may be treated. However, state statutes are sometimes challenged. For
756 instance, when there is a question as to a statute’s meaning, or to determine if a statute
757 follows the state constitution, the Supreme Court is asked to review the law. The
758 Court then writes an opinion on that law.
759
760 State statutes are the starting points for most animal law in New Mexico. State
761 statutes provide the framework for the comprehensive structure of animal law
762 throughout the state. The state cannot explicitly cover all the potential interests in
763 animal law by statute, however, so it delegates some of its authority to state agencies
764 and to local units of government (counties and cities). For instance, state laws and
765 local animal control ordinances govern conduct involving animal cruelty.
766
767 Regulations
768
769 State executive agencies carry out state laws through the development and
770 enforcement of regulations in specific areas of animal law. The state Game
771 Commission, Racing Commission, Livestock Board, and Veterinary Board are state
772 executive agencies.
773
774 Authorized by statutes, regulations (sometimes called rules or administrative laws)
775 have the effect of law. Someone violating a regulation is, in effect, violating the law
776 that created it. Regulations are designed to increase flexibility and efficiency in the
777 operation of laws. Many of the actual working provisions of statutes are embodied in
778 regulations.
779
780 Most regulations are developed and enacted through a rule-making process, which
781 includes public input. State agencies hold open meetings and public hearings,
782 allowing citizens to participate in the creation of regulations. Participation in the
783 process is extremely important, but often overlooked by citizens. It provides a unique
784 opportunity for citizens to influence and shapes their laws directly. Most regulations
785 are in effect for only a limited period of time and must be updated or reenacted on a
786 regular basis.
787
788 Ordinances
789
790 Just as a state may delegate the authority to make regulations to administrative
791 agencies, it may also delegate certain powers to other units of government within the
792 state. County and municipal governments enact laws, often called ordinances, via
793 specific powers granted to them by the state. County and municipal ordinances apply
794 to everyone within the county or municipality limits. These ordinances may not
795 violate state or federal laws.
796
797 The powers of county and municipal governments relating to animals typically
798 include such things as: regulation of companion animals through leash laws and
799 vaccination registration laws; regulation of issues relating to public health and safety;
800 and regulation of the number and kinds of animals that may be kept within county or

16
801 city boundaries.
802
803 Common Law
804
805 Common law is sometimes called “judge-made” law. It consists of the rules of law
806 that come from the written decisions of judges who hear and decide litigation
807 (lawsuits). Judges are empowered to make these decisions by the constitution and
808 statutes. When a judge decides a case and publishes a written decision, the decision
809 becomes the precedent for future litigation.
810
811 In conclusion, it is necessary to be familiar with all these areas of the law, so that
812 animals may be protected to the highest degree allowable. A greater understanding of
813 current laws (including how they are enforced) will lead to an understanding of which
814 laws need to be changed in order to afford animals the most protection
815 possible.,“Every State law must conform in the first place to the Constitution of the
816 United States, and then to the subordinate constitutions of the particular state; and if it
817 infringes upon the provisions of either, it is so far void.” Houston v. Moore, 18 US 1,
818 5 L.Ed 19 (1840). It is abiding truth that “nothing can destroy a government more
819 quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter
820 of its own existence.” Mapp v. Ohio,367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961). HARRIS V. NEW
821 YORK U.S. Supreme Court·401 U.S. 222 (1971).
822 ,save the Constitution law, watch Interstate 60 (Full Movie) James Marsden and Gary
823 Oldman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdoYBLrq-co
824
825
826 What branch of We the lawful bloodline american government is a cop, the
827 Legislative Branch, Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch? IF the cop is not part of
828 the three out of four branches of public service government, then he is a Corpora Ficta
829 employee, committing crimes and embezzlement of public and tax , corporation funds
830 for his employment and high crimes under PRETENDED authority of government.
831 The cop has no power from we the lawful bloodline american government and uses
832 gang like tactics for force compliance with city county and state ordinance , statutes s
833 and codes and religious administration rules with his will alone.
834 Any other law, besides 1776-1789 ratified Constitutional law, is foreign agency
835 agents law such as Napoleonic law, Uniform Commercial Code, Civil Law, color of
836 any State law, any State statute, any city , county , State ordinance, any City , county ,
837 State regulation, or any State custom or any city , county , State usage. The officer is
838 striking against the Republic constitutional form of government by using foreign law!
839 Under the 11th Amendment, other states cannot participate in out of state violations of
840 the law, driver’s license , land , cell phone , vehicle is legal foreign
841 agents terminology aka covered wagon searches without a warrant by Constitution
842 law , or even credit checks without a grand jury warrant!
843
844 Police Have No Duty to Protect You | Cop Block
845 www.copblock.org/27067/police-have-no-duty-to-protect-you/
846 Feb 12, 2013 ... Not only are police “customers” told to pay “or else” (talk about
847 perverse ... duty” to protect him or any individual on the train that day—there's a ...
848 No Road Pirates - Stop the government from "Policing for ...
849 www.noroadpirates.com
850 The road pirates are working extra hard to prove their worth to the state. If the road

17
851 pirates don’t bring in enough cash to meet their quota then they will be in ...
852 Road Pirates with Badges Plunder Motorists to Fund Police ...
853 reason.com/reasontv/2014/06/16/dont-cops-mountain-view
854 Jun 15, 2014 · It may look like extortion, but cops in Mountain, View Colorado call it
855 policing. The small Colorado town funds police salaries by writing a ridiculous
856 Road Pirates with Badges Plunder Motorists to Fund Police ..
857 thefreethoughtproject.com › Badge Abuse
858 Road Pirates with Badges Plunder Motorists to Fund Police: Don’t cops have better
859 things to do?! Matt Agorist June 17, 2014
860
861 What branch of We the lawful bloodline american government is a cop, the
862 Legislative Branch, Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch? IF the cop is not part of
863 the three out of four branches of public service government, then he is a Corpora Ficta
864 employee, committing crimes and embezzlement of public and tax , corporation funds
865 for his employment and high crimes under PRETENDED authority of government.
866 The cop has no power from we the lawful bloodline american government and uses
867 gang like tactics for force compliance with city county and state ordinance , statutes s
868 and codes and religious administration rules with his will alone.
869 Any other law, besides 1776-1789 ratified Constitutional law, is foreign agency
870 agents law such as Napoleonic law, Uniform Commercial Code, Civil Law, color of
871 any State law, any State statute, any city , county , State ordinance, any City , county ,
872 State regulation, or any State custom or any city , county , State usage. The officer is
873 striking against the Republic constitutional form of government by using foreign law!
874 Under the 11th Amendment, other states cannot participate in out of state violations of
875 the law, driver’s license , land , cell phone , vehicle is legal foreign
876 agents terminology aka covered wagon searches without a warrant by Constitution
877 law , or even credit checks without a grand jury warrant!
878
879 Whereas :
880
881 5 USC § 3331 Oath of office: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
882 support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
883 and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this
884 obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will
885 well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So
886 help me God is Attorneys language .” AKA Native lawful bloodline forty
887 eight language the Creator , Greatspirit and mother earth
888
889 Whereas : Law enforcement OUR SWORN DUTY
890
891 An area of serious consideration for every police officer, is to understand that the
892 most important law in our land he has taken an oath to protect, defend, AND
893 ENFORCE, is not state laws, nor city or county ordinances, but, that law that
894 supersede all other laws in our nation, – the U.S. Constitution. If laws in a particular
895 police officer’s state, or local community are in conflict with the SUPREME LAW of
896 our nation, there Is no question that the officer’s duty is to “uphold the U.S.
897 Constitution.”
898
899 What does this mean to the “patrol officer” who will be the only sworn “Executive
900 Officer” on the scene, when knowledgeable Citizens raise serious objections over

18
901 possession of insurance, drivers licenses and other restrictions? It definitely means
902 these officers will be faced with a hard decision. (Most certainly if that decision
903 effects state, city or county revenues, such as the issuing of citations do.)
904
905 Example: If a state legislator, judge or a superior tells a police officer to proceed and
906 enforce a contradictory, (illegal), state law rather than the Supreme Law of this
907 country, what is that “sworn officer” to do? Although we may not want to hear it,
908 there is but one right answer, – “the officer is duty bound to uphold his oath of office”
909 and obey the highest laws of the nation. THIS IS OUR SWORN DUTY AND IT’S
910 THE LAW!
911
912 Such a strong honest stand taken by a police officer, upholding his or her oath of
913 office, takes moral strength of character. It will, without question, “SEPARATE THE
914 MEN FROM THE BOYS.” Such honest and straight forward decisions on behalf of a
915 government official have often caused pressure to be applied to force such officers to
916 set aside, or compromise their morals or convictions.
917
918 As a solace for those brave souls in uniform that will stand up for law and justice,
919 even when it’s unpopular, or uncomfortable to do so…let me say this. In any legal
920 stand-off over a sworn official “violating” or “upholding” their oath of office, those
921 that would side with the “violation” should inevitable lose.
922
923 Our Founding Fathers assured us, on many occasions, the following: Defending our
924 freedoms in the face of people that would for “expedients sake,” or behind the guise,
925 “for the safety and welfare of the masses,” ignore peoples rights, would forever
926 demand sacrifice andvigilance from those that desired to remain free. That sounds a
927 little like – “Freedom is not free!”
928
929 Every police officer should keep the following court ruling, that was covered earlier,
930 in mind before issuing citations in regard to “mandatory licensing, registration and
931 insurance” – verses – “the right of the people to travel unencumbered”:
932
933 “THE CLAlM AND EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RlGHT CANNOT BE
934 CONVERTED INTO A CRIME.” – Miller v U.S., 230 F 2d 486. 489
935
936 Whereas:
937
938 Local police departments (LPDs) across the nation are incorporated as specialized
939 non-profits. Most LPDs are known to the Secretary of State in their respective state as
940 an association which gives
941 the impression to the average citizen that this is a union. However this is not the case.
942
943 The LPDs are contracted by the City Council to perform police services and securitize
944 the city they are hired in. This is the exchange of a local foreign government hiring a
945 private security firm to
946 stabilize the local population and generate revenue for the private city CORPS Non
947 for profits through tickets, arrests aka Kidnapping and unlawful recording infractions.
948 However, this does not include upholding unlawful administration local laws, as the
949 County Sheriff's Office is elected to take charge of.1778 ratified Constitution law of
950 real crimes

19
 951
952 The problem with this system is that the LPDs, being corporations, are subject to
953 corporate law. And corporations fall into dissolution (i.e. the termination of the
954 corporation) for various reasons quite
955 often. When it is the LPD that dissolves; this becomes a question of legal authority
956 over the citizens by the hired private security firm known as the LPD.
957
958 Corporations that dissolve are not allowed by law to conduct business. These same
959 rules apply to the LPD that is actually a corporation hired by the foreign local
960 government or city council to preform police services. That all by law have to elected
961 and public servents and all immigration have to registrar with the 1938 FARA can
962 help detect foreign influence on American politics. ... election cycle, you may have
963 heard pundits talk about FARA, or the Foreign ... In 1938, Congress passed the
964 Foreign Agents Registration Act, ... many other “influence” activities, like public
965 relations and tourism. .... Read our terms of service. This was pass from WWII To
966 protect the lawful bloodline Americans
967
968 For example, in the State of Oregon, over 12 LPDs are in dissolution. On the
969 Secretary of State website, when a LPD is dissolved it is classified as "INA" or
970 inactive. This includes LPDs in the following cities:
971
972 • Beaverton • Canby • Charleston • Eugene • Gresham •King County • Lake Oswego •
973 Lebanon • Portland • Sherwood• Weston including your state county and city
974
975 Dictionary of Law 1893
976 Christianity. The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion
977 founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. "Christianity is
978 parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to
979 speak in subversion of the law." -Taylor's Case, Ventris 293 (1676). "The essential
980 principles of natural religion and of revealed religion are a part of the common law, so
981 that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at
982 common law". -Case of Evans, 2 Burn. Ec. L. 185 (1780). The maxim can have no
983 reference to the law of the National government, since the sources of that law are the
984 Constitution, treaties, and acts of Congress. See Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591 (1831).
985 See further Law, Common; Blasphemy; Policy, 2.; Religion.
986
987
988
989 US Constitution Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil
990 Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and
991 Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
992 Westin, The Wire-Tapping Problem, 52 Col. L. Rev. 165 (1952).What is perhaps even
993 more noteworthy is its pervasive disregard in practice by those who as law officers
994 owe special obedience to law. What is true of the federal Act against wiretapping and
995 its violations is widely true of related state legislation and its disobedience. Few
996 sociological generalizations are more valid than that lawlessness begets lawlessness.
997 18 USC 1918 1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
998 If the cop writes a ticket he’s impersonating a grand jury, as they are the only ones
999 who can summons you to answer. Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer
1000 for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a

20
1001 Grand Jury.
1002 When the cop serves the summons, an impersonation of a Sheriff is taking place. The
1003 Sheriff is a member of the executive branch of government. The day-to-day
1004 enforcement and administration of federal laws is permitted, NOT STATE CODES,
1005 REGULATIONS OR STATUTES. Therefore the cop is only enforcing statutes in
1006 violation of the law, as vigilantes.
1007 When the cop forces you to sign the ticket, he’s impersonating a Bailiff. The Bailiff is
1008 a member of the judicial branch of the government. The cop is not a part of the
1009 government at all and the demand to appear does not come from the government at all.
1010 The cop is not a civil officer of the judiciary and the summons did not come from any
1011 court. The ticket under threat of torture is pure fraud.
1012 When the cop commits any crime he is a trespasser ab initio. The cop owes special
1013 duty to the law and when he becomes the “LAW”, not the servant of the law, he
1014 becomes a trespasser ab initio.
1015 It is a felony for the cop to turn on emergency lights when there is no (LIFE OR
1016 DEATH) emergency.
1017 It is perjury to make a statement that you are driving when you are not a Taxi
1018 DRIVER, Limo DRIVER, Truck Driver or Shuttle DRIVER, as licenses and
1019 registrations are only required for commercial activity; that means business ONLY. In
1020 the LAW, people have the right to travel as a part of one’s right to liberty and the
1021 pursuit of happiness.
1022 When the cop then asks for your “PAPERS PLEASE” he becomes a communist,
1023 wherein only a Grand Jury can demand you to answer.
1024 When the cop acts on behalf of a private bank or private county treasury, he is in fact
1025 demanding a bribe.
1026 When the cop holds you for even one minute, it is a fact of law that is arrest without a
1027 Grand Jury Indictment.
1028 The Cop can only hold you to answer if you are a public servant and subject to
1029 impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors, without a Grand Jury summons.
1030 When the cop works as a Corpora Ficta employee, the cop must carry a license for the
1031 firearm they have on their person.
1032 When the cop without an injured party, is now acting as an injured party wherein
1033 there is a conflict of interest as the cop is only there to write a illegal writ of attainder,
1034 not protect the public from all enemies foreign and domestic.
1035 The cop is an agent for the Corporation of the City, County, or State, he is not a
1036 member of the government at all, while his pay must be from the US Treasury and all
1037 bills issued by a Grand Jury must be made to the US Treasury.
1038 The very demand that you pay a private treasury is a demand for a bribe. The cop in
1039 reality is a Corpora Ficta employee and not a government employee at all. He has no
1040 powers of a government official whatsoever.
1041 License and registration produces commercial connection/nexus to Corporate City,
1042 County or State. License and registration are commercial agreements and not
1043 contracts. If one is not involved in commercial activity then there is no exercise of a
1044 privilege that must be licensed and registered.
1045 When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a
1046 summons to Court, the cop is now impersonating an officer of the court. He is then
1047 not part of any of the branches of the government, as an employee of the Pretend
1048 Government Corporation, a Corpora Ficta employee.
1049 When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a
1050 summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of exchange. You cannot lawfully sign

21
1051 a bill of exchange, because you are not receiving the original copy.
1052 When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a
1053 summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of attainder unlawfully, as you are not
1054 a public servant and there is a jury required to convict you to make it lawful.
1055 No one person can serve in two branches of the government at the same time. Only a
1056 sheriff can execute (serve) a summons, or compulsory legal process, and the cop is
1057 clearly not a member of the executive branch of the government and the ticket is pure
1058 fraud.
1059 In summary, cops in traffic stops are impersonating government officials on an
1060 emergency and the one being stopped is the emergency. Cops try to get people to
1061 validate their fraud. Cops impersonate judicial officers, impersonate being a Sheriff
1062 who is an executive officer, violate the principal of separation of powers, and
1063 impersonate a court bailiff by signing the false summons thereby impersonating a
1064 judicial officer a second time. The entire summons is a total fraud because it is not a
1065 government document at all; it is a corporate document being forced upon private
1066 People.
1067 Questions for a public Servant:
1068 1) Do you understand that under Trezevant v. City of Tampa that I will be charging
1069 you 1000 per minute?
1070 2) Where is the emergency?
1071 3) Do you understand under Macias V. Ihde, if you are obstructing my rights, you
1072 may be liable, in both your personal and public capacity?
1073 4) Are you aware that all of your individual assets can and will be lawfully subject to
1074 seizure by lien(s) which cannot be removed by any court of law, but only by me, for
1075 high crimes and misdemeanors?
1076 5) Are you aware that anything you do or say can be used against you?
1077 6) Do you consider yourself to be above the law?
1078 7) Are you aware that you are contracting with me?
1079 8) Whom do you work for, the state, county or city?
1080 9) Can you state for the record which branch of the government you work for-
1081 Elective, Judicial, or Executive?
1082 10) Do you have a valid oath of office and faithful performance bond on file with the
1083 Secretary of State of New Mexico?
1084 11) Do you have your valid DBA validly registered with the Secretary of State of
1085 New Mexico?
1086 12) Are you aware that impersonating a government employee is a high crime and
1087 misdemeanor?
1088 13) Do you believe that you are the injured party?
1089 14) Where is the strict-proof of assessment of damages from the injured party?
1090 15) Have you sworn to uphold the Constitution of the united states of America?
1091
1092
1093 Whereas : Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 346 (U.S. 1996)
1094 The United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case, as settled by courts
1095 of one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states; state courts may not
1096 reopen cases which have been conclusively decided by the courts of another state.
1097 Later, Chief Justice John Marshall suggested that the judgment of one state court must
1098 be recognized by other states' courts as final. Mills v. Duryee, 1t1 U.S. (7 Cranch) 481
1099 (1813).
1100 "

22
1101 Article IV Section 1
1102 Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and
1103 judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws
1104 prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved,
1105 and the Effect thereof.
1106
1107
1108 Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution
1109 +++ When a judge acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person of his
1110 constitutional rights he exercises no discretion or individual judgment; he acts no
1111 longer as a judge, but as a " minister" of his own prejudices. [386 U.S. 547, 568].
1112 +++ A judge is liable for injury caused by a ministerial act; to have immunity the
1113 judge must be performing a judicial function. See, e. g., Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S.
1114 339 ; 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts 1642-1643 (1956).
1115 +++ The presence of malice and the intention to deprive a person of his civil rights is
1116 wholly incompatible with the judicial function.
1117 ++++ When the state in the instant case is one of the perpetrators and violators, there
1118 can be no expectation of just, indeed any, relief from it. The State cannot cause a
1119 federal violation, and then try to prohibit litigants from seeking redress in the federal
1120 courts for those same violations (i.e. the state cannot violate our fundamental rights,
1121 and then try to have us dismissed out of federal court for seeking vindication of those
1122 rights) ' "We have long recognized that a state cannot create a transitory cause of
1123 action and at the same time destroy the fight to sue on that transitory cause of action
1124 in any court having jurisdiction", Tennessee Coal, Iron & R, Co. v. George, 233 U.S.
1125 354, 360 (1914)' cited in Marshall v. Marshall (2006).Judges' oath of office includes
1126 the undertaking to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States. Any Judge
1127 violating such undertakings loses jurisdiction, resulting in his orders being VOID, and
1128 he himself commits a treasonable offense against the United States.
1129
1130
1131 The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is entitled
1132 to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union (2
1133 Black 620, see also Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35. Plaintiff should not be charged
1134 fees, or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition this court in this matter
1135 in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally
1136 implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the
1137 Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43]
1138
1139 PERMANENT ALLEGIANCE TO A STATE:
1140
1141 If we were to examine the term national in the US Codes we would see a national
1142 owing their
1143 allegiance to a State and further see a distinction concerning a ''national of the United
1144 States''.
1145 "Title 8" USC § 1101(a)(21) The term ''national'' means a person owing permanent
1146 allegiance to a state.
1147 (22) The term ''national of the United States'' means (A) a citizen of the United States,
1148 or (B)
1149 a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to
1150 the United

23
1151 States.
1152 (23) The term ''naturalization'' means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a
1153 person after birth, by any means whatsoever.
1154 Can one be a national in America with a right to live, work and travel in America
1155 without being a national of the United States?
1156 Yes. If they will be a part of another governing body.
1157
1158 Until the people become a party to the constitution they were not citizens subject. "
1159 For when the revolution took place, the people of each state became themselves
1160 sovereign; and in
1161 that character hold the absolute right to all their navigable waters, and the soils under
1162 them, for their own common use, subject only to the rights since surrendered by the
1163 constitution to the
1164 general government."
1165
1166 Martin vs Waddell, 41 US (16 Pet) 367, 410 (1842)
1167
1168 “Merely being native born within the territorial boundaries of the United States of
1169 America does
1170 not make such an inhabitant a Citizen of the United States subject to the jurisdiction
1171 of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1172 Elk v. Wilkins, Neb (1884), 5s.ct.41,112 U.S. 99, 28 L. Ed. 643.
1173
1174 Notice to Clerk~
1175
1176 The minute you receive any document, it is recorded according to the following case
1177 site.
1178
1179 Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144 (Tex.1990).
1180 “An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk,
1181 regardless of whether the instrument is “file-marked.”
1182
1183 Should you refuse to record My documents, once deposited with you, you are
1184 committing a crime under Title18 USC § 2071 and it is punishable by fines and
1185 imprisonment. If your attorney told you not to file any documents like mine, you are
1186 still responsible, as I do not accept any third party intervenors. Any attorney, district
1187 attorney, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have a
1188 license to make a legal determination in this matter as they do not represent Me and
1189 you, the county clerk, and do not have the authority to represent Me.
1190
1191 Title 18 USC – Crimes and Criminal Procedure
1192 Part I – Crimes
1193 Chapter 101 – Records and Reports
1194 Section 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
1195 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or
1196 destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any
1197 record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited
1198 with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or
1199 with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title
1200 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

24
1201 (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,
1202 document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
1203 obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
1204 not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from
1205 holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term
1206 ''office'' does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the
1207 Armed Forces of the United States.
1208
1209 Revised Statutes of The United States, 1st session, 43 Congress 1873-1874.
1210 Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE
1211 SEC. 5403. (Destroying, &c., public records.)
1212 Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or
1213 destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice,
1214 filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document,
1215 or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer,
1216 shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so
1217 taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at
1218 hard labor, not more than three years, or both: [See § § 5408, 5411, 5412.1]
1219 SEC. 5407. (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws.)
1220 If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding,
1221 hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any
1222 State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws,
1223 or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the
1224 right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of
1225 such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than
1226 five thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than
1227 six months nor more than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See § §
1228 1977-1991, 2004-2010, 5506-5510.1
1229 SEC. 5408. (Destroying record by officer in charge.)
1230 Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding
1231 specified in section fifty-four hundred and three, who fraudulently takes away, or
1232 withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his
1233 office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two
1234 thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or
1235 both-, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified
1236 from holding any office under the Government of the United States.
1237
1238
1239 The courts are free:
1240 Take Mandatory Judice Notice and Cognizance ( Federal Rules of Evidence 201 (d)
1241 that “plaintiff” ie Libellant has a lawful right to proceed without cost, based upon the
1242 following law:
1243
1244 "A court of law adjudicates cases based on legal, not equitable, principles and rights
1245 and can grant only legal remedies to enforce legal rights and to redress the violation
1246 of legal rights.
1247
1248 Plaintiff (libellant) should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and
1249 Constitutional Right to petition this court in this matter in which he/she is entitled to
1250 relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and

25
1251 subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural
1252 individual and entitled to relief (Hale v Hinkel, 201 US 43, NAACP v Button, 371 US
1253 415); United Mineworkers v Gibbs, 383 US 715; and Johnson v Avery, 89 S.Ct. 747
1254 (1969). Crandell v Nevada, 6 Wall 35]. Members of groups who are competent non-
1255 lawyers, can assist other members of the group, achieve the goals of the group in
1256 court without being charged with “unauthorized practice of law.”
1257
1258
1259 DISCLAIMERS – We are not an Attorneys (Lawyer), financial adviser, Judge, Tax
1260 Expert, or claim to be an expert in anything. We do not offer Legal or Tax related
1261 legal advice, or any other form of Law. One should always seek “competent counsel”
1262 regarding all legal or tax related issues. We do research and share open source
1263 information for fun, entertainment, for comparison. All the public or private
1264 exchanges between our members and our staff are personal use only, and always
1265 under the protection of free speech, and in doing so are we never wilfully committing
1266 an unlawful act against another party, statute, or entity by speaking or discussing
1267 anything. Even if it were mis-interpreted as giving any form of “advice”, please note
1268 the following cases…
1269
1270 AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
1271 A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of
1272 Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
1273 B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!
1274 Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) ****
1275
1276
1277 Lawful Bloodline Lakota American Autograph Nii Nee
1278
1279
1280
1281 ______________________________________-
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286 -Seal_____________________Red thumb print
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292 Acknowledgment
1293 An acknowledgment is a formal admission made in person before a proper official by
1294 someone who has executed an instrument. The Autograph-er must personally
1295 appear before the
1296 Notary Public, the signer must be positively identified by the Notary Public and the
1297 autograph
1298 must acknowledge having willingly autograph the Affidavit instrument . The
1299 autograph-er is required to Autograph in the presence of the Notary
1300 Public. Affidavit Acknowledgment Form:

26
1301
1302 Oregon State or State of Kansas County of __________________________
1303
1304 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _______day
1305 of________________, 20____,
1306
1307 at ____________________, State Of Kansas INC, by ________________________
1308
1309 ______________________ to be his/her free act and deed.
1310
1311
1312
1313 ________________________________________________________________
1314 Signature of Notary Public
1315 Name of Notary Public (print your name)
1316 SEAL Notary Public, State of Kansas
1317
1318
1319
1320 My commission expires: _____________
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325 Jurat notarizations are required for transactions where the Autograph-er must attest
1326 to the content of the Instrument , such as all affidavits and pleadings in court. It is a
1327 certification on an affidavit declaring when, where and before whom it was sworn. In
1328 executing a jurat, a notary guarantees that the Autograph-er personally appeared
1329 before the notary, was given an oath or affirmation by the notary attesting to the
1330 truthfulness of the Instrument , and Autograph the instrument in the notary's
1331 presence. It is always important that the notary positively identify a Autograph-er for
1332 a jurat, as s/he is certifying that the Autograph attested to the truthfulness of the
1333 Instrument contents under Constitution law. However, jurat notarizations do not prove
1334 a Instrument is true, lawful, valid or enforceable.
1335
1336 "jurat" is as follows:
1337
1338 Subscribed and sworn to by _________________ before me on the
1339 _________________ day of
1340
1341 ________________ , Year _______.
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346 Autograph of injured Party ______________________________________________
1347
1348
1349
1350

27
1351
1352 Printed name___________________________________________
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357 Notary public, State of Kansas , County of _________________
1358 ________________________________________________________________
1359 Signature of Notary Public
1360 Name of Notary Public (print your name)
1361 SEAL Notary Public, State of Kansas
1362
1363
1364
1365 My commission expires: _____________

28