Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
106<'30 ,
r./i/o: d o
[/Banda Aceh ~ ........,, ,. ......" /". Lhokseumawe
VZZZEZA
i~".._o4. 2o U./;
<b
/Sidikafang,
" ~'(///"/~
"rebingt!pggi' I
;
~,/Pematan(
/ siantar"
" Bagansiapiapi
." ./c-~/./'//./'
t7
Padang-
sidempuan
NE Muarasiberut
Sungaipenuh'
and
Ketuan
., 0913 / ..."
Fig. 1.5. Coverage, sheet numbers and names of the 1:250 000 Geological Maps
published by the Indonesian Geological Survey, the Geological Research and
Pre-Tertiary stratigraphy
Pre-Carboniferous basement
I I I I
97 ~ 98 ~
96 ~ 99~
BANDA
Major Faults
Recent Volcanoes
Unit
@ Permo-Triassic Intrusions
,E~::~Ujeuen
tion
Sormation
(Peusangan Group)
Uneun Unit, Tawar Lst Fro,
Situtup Lst Fm, Sembuang Lst Fm,
Ujeuen Lst Fm, Kaloi Lst Fm,
Batumilmil Lst Fm (mainly limestones)
,U.:0 XkJ'~i
,:-,,C.e-.-.<-
9-.,....,_
=_ i i lU... =.
(Tapanuli Group) ~.
Bohorok Formation
(pebbly mudstones)
Ktuet Formation o
(metamorphosed)
96 < ,
Tawar "~
Formation
Gnei
\
TA PAKTUAN
lOOk~
97 ~
I
9 LANGSA
Simpang Kiri
Kaloi
Formation
Bohorok
N alvvampu Toba
tumilmil Tufts
Toba
Tufts ~-~ I~j
IoL%~'~
:'~.
98 ~~%,1,
\A as..~ ...........
I -LAke,,--
9
9 I- ~..TobaTuffs........( I
I
Formation Toba,~: : : u9
10~ 101 ~,
~ 4
-~'~'~ ~'~
-2'>N ~
e~aru
-Formation_C~"~ \%-v--:7 "~k
9
9 .'~i~q./'-,~./~/ ~Y.?N.
9 ." .., .'.
9 ". ". ".
N\~ "~
2 ~
........
\ ~, ~'#~.~'~a-'~ PAffARSIBUHAN
I'%Ui::lltli:l.ll
~7,~.~
Alas Formation
(limestones)
Kluet/Kuantan Formati
Formation
Limestone Member (L
_ 98 o uhur
Equator I I ~---~ ~t~-~ . . ~\~.~.'~'~'~/'~0rma!!..~ r
100{~Ex_,r~ ~, ~
BUKIT
PAYAKUMBUH~
O RENGAT ~~~--~~
~_~rigapuluh
raO,c,
2 o
Tabir Formation -- "~ '"*" ~ ii
PERMO-TRIASSIC \ %~ "'-~::!i!::iii!i:::
Triassic
Permian with \ )_~k ~
,. ~ volcanics ~ k
CARBONIFEROUS -?EARLY PERMIAN
J 2
Mentulu Fm etc.with pebbly mudst
Kuantan Formation
Limestone Units L
Certain
9 MUARABUNGO ~
Patepat
Formation
Formation
Duabelas
Mountains
0
t '
Major Faults
Recent
Volcanoes
Permo-Triassic
Intrusions
S Serpentinite
2,"
50 100km
III ....
Tigapuluh Group
I I I
Formation;
45'
--I ,"Ut/l l 1
Inliers of
Gangsal
Formation
in Limau I-
1 ooo's : Gangsal
:Formation
TIGAPULUH
MOUNTAINS 45'
Triassic-Jurassic
Granites
TIGAPULUH GROUP
.'.-.-\'.-.--.-.-...N~...2I~Mentulu
.~.N[," [ "15engabuhan ~ ~
0 5 10 15 20kin
to Jambi
15' L
15' 30' lO3~OO'
Fig. 4.6. Distribution of stratigraphic units in the Tigapuluh Hills (alter Suwama
et al. 1991" Simandjuntak et al. 1991 ). Areas left blank are covered by Tertiary
to Recent
sediments.
104'~00 '
Qv
9, ...F .,
o., ,,,.
Qv ,J-'-: ~ ...............
,%
% % %, % %` %, % % % %, % % "-" .~ .., ..~ ,,,, ,,.. ,,.,. .,
% % "% % % % % % '% % "%"-."'%"'%~" " t'~ ...... F
,/,'...'Garba Pluton,",",,'%.'~ ,, ~,, ~ ~x@~.
% % % % % "% % "% "% % % % ~. -,,,,,..w, '~ "." "-" "-"~.O.O,Or
.Y ." ,' ," ,' ." ,' ,' ,' ,' -" ,' .rdununq A
4o30 ,
i:~ }~";"-"-"-"-"-~','.~-"::: :: ~" - "'," -'," -',",,.'~
Qs
.... Mm
9
Qs
Qs
Quaternary Sediments
QuaternaryVolcanics
Ptiocene
Late Miocene
Middle Miocene
Oligo-Miocene
Eocene
MARTAPURA~/-
Qs
,_~ F Faults
Mesozoic Units
(correlated with the Woyla Group)
~ Melange
Fig. 4.7. The distribution of the Pre-Tertiary units in the Garba Mountains, South
Sumatra, after GRDC geological map of Baturaja (Gafoer et al. 1994). The
Metamorphosed Palaeozoics are correlated with the Tapanuli Group and the Garba and
Situlanglang Formations are correlated with the Jurassic-Cretaceous Woyla Group
Interpretation
104~
~45' 105~ ~
" <z;~ ~ ~
-5o15 ,
%
\ %,~% ~ KOTAAGUNG
~s
atk
-5~ ' \
"~'~. Strike-slip Faults
Recent'Volcanoes
Menanga Formation
(mid-Cretaceous)
Gunungkasih Complex_
(Palaeozoic)
BANDARLAMPUNG
5~45 '-
................... ......................
I ........................ l ................................ l
Vis~an age has also been established for the Limestone Member of
the Kuantan Formation (Fontaine & Gafoer 1989; Metcalfe 1983;
Vachard 1989a, b). The record by Turner (1983) of plant remains
in the Nior member of the Kuantan Formation is compatible with
this age attribution. Turbiditic sandstones and pelites, similar to
those of the Kluet and Bohorok formations, occur interbedded
with limestones characteristic of the Alas Formation, suggesting
to the surveyors that the Alas is part of the same sedimentary
sequence as the other units (Cameron et al. 1980). They therefore
considered that the Bohorok, Alas and Kluet/Kuantan formations
are lateral facies variants of a coherent sedimentary assemblage.
....................... I
Fontaine & Gafoer (1989) relate the fauna and algal flora of
the Visdan Alas limestones to those found elsewhere in the
Sibumasu Block, in western Peninsular Malaya, Thailand and
Burma. On the other hand, they relate the fauna and algal flora
of the limestones in the Visdan Kuantan Formation to those
of the eastern Peninsular Malaya and the Indochina Block in
Thailand, Laos and Vietnam.
-4~ '~ ~'~ ~O LANGSA , r)~-" I~:....:....:iiii::l Tr,asslc chert & sandstone
(Ch,CI)_
"k~" ~N~" Bat~umilmil(Lst) ~ Kodiang 1"~..~ Permian and Triassic
~. ~ F~ ~B~inOMUAR.ABUNG~JAMBI~. ~BtmNGKA~sandstone
'~L ~?MP)
Buklt 'ALEMBAI~G%Q)
98 ~ 100~ 102~
At the type locality in the Sungai Kualu, the lithologies are thin-
Tuhur Formation (Figs 4.4 & 4.5). Silitonga & Kastowo (1975)
defined the Tuhur Formation forming extensive outcrops to the
SE of Lake Singkarak in the Solok Quadrangle. This outcrop
was later extended southwards into the Painan-Timurlaut
Muarasiberut Quadrangle to the east of Lakes Dibawah and
Diatas (Rosidi et al. 1976). A further outcrop was mapped to the
NE of Payakumbuh and this outcrop was traced northwards,
using aerial photographic interpretation, across the equator into
the Pekanbaru Quadrangle (Clarke et al. 1982b). Silitonga &
Kastowo (1975) distinguished a Slate and Shale Member,
forming the greater part of the outcrop, composed of grey to
dark grey slate, black shales, and brown cherts with thin grey-
wacke sandstones, and a Limestone Member composed of
poorly bedded sandy limestone and massive fossiliferous
conglomeratic limestone, with thin intercalated shale and slate.
Limestone pebbles in the conglomerates contain fusulinid forami-
nifera of Permian age. Musper (1930) suggested that this
formation is of Triassic age. The Tuhur Formation may be
correlated with the Kualu Formation, described above.
Silungkang Formation (Figs 4.4 & 4.5). The type locality for the
Silungkang Formation (Klomp6 et al. 1961) is the road and river
sections around the village of Silungkang, between Solok and
Sawahlunto to the SE of Lake Singkarak. The formation also
crops out discontinuously along Lake Singkarak and northwest-
wards across the equator towards Muarasipongi. A lower Volcanic
Member is composed of hornblende and augite andesites with
intercalated tufts, limestones, shale and sandstone. An upper
Limestone Member is also recognized, composed of massive
grey limestone interbedded with shales, sandstones and tufts
(Silitonga & Kastowo 1975). The rocks are commonly highly
fossiliferous with large foraminifers: Doliolina lepida Schwager,
Pseudofusulina padangensis, Neoschwagerina multiseptata
Deprat and Fusulinella lantenoisi Deprat, at Silungkang (Katili
(Vachard 1989a, b). The fauna has affinities with the fauna of
the Lower Permian of China and Central Europe (Fontaine &
Gafoer 1989). Fusulinids indicate that the plant beds are of
Upper Asselian age, possibly extending into the Sakmarian (Fon-
taine & Gafoer 1989, footnote on p. 55).
Conclusions
TETHYAN
STAGES
STAGES
RHAETIAN
NORIAN
CARNIAN
LADINIAN
ANISIAN
SCYTHIAN
TATARIAN
KAZANIAN
UFIMIAN
KUNGURIA
ARTINSKIA
SAKMARI3
ASSELIAN
DORASHAMIAN
DZULFIAN
MIDIAN
MURGHABIAN
KUBEGANDIAN
BOLORIAN
YAHTASHIAN
SAKMARIAN
ASSELIAN
9;~
~;
.
.~k~, : >,
9;~ 1'00o
A
, !
Active Volcanoes
Quaternary-Recent Volcanics
Tertiary sediments and volcanics
Woyla Group and correlatives
Palaeozoic Basement
22~ ~ '7:.
9
9 v v .... "",--... j__~ 2 ~
k '\.~ NataI]~I~)~i i i i i i .O2 ."~-3" (7.
-"o~,
" ~ ~ .
i ~,.,,~ X;~. Rawas-
9 .......
":..:'\,; ~'~,~'~l~,A~a~: : : : : : : :
7)
: .--. 7":.-,.
~
nUN A NI ~,,~,_.L,t"~� ~
~
/ /
O X %.,.o k .,o.,,~5\ .~',,~
-"X
\;~~ \~.[ L:~ ~.'-:-Gumai ........... .)-"._~ ?'~b ~A,~ " .........
-X~. -~.~\:jv,~ ........... /~ '~,~ .'~'.~. >: ............ :~
"'~%. ..... Garba ..... ',
o?o
7cm/yr /
o?~
X
,oo0
" >%~O~n!ma;ung
"~.~ ~.: ~
,o,,0
6 ~
,ooo
Fig. 4.12. Simplified geological map of
Sumatra, showing the distribution of the
Woyla Group and correlated units, with
localities mentioned in the text.
BANDA
6~
Cretaceous granites
WOYLA GROUP
Lamno
Bentaro
Volcanic~
5 ~ N
Geumpang
~. Larn Minet
~ Oceanic assemblage
Arc assemblage
Meukuk Gneiss
Undifferentiated
Peridotite/serpentinite 5~
Teunom~ , Batholith
CALANG Lke
Penarum
r undifferentiated
MEULABOH
4 ~ N
~.
SFZ
KL
GL
0
Faults
Thrusts
Sumatran Fault System
Kla Line
Geumpang Line
50 100km
9
96 ~
I
Babahrot
Meukuek
'~
TAPAKTUAN
97 ~
I
Fig. 4.13. The distribution of the Woyla
Group in Aceh. Modified from Stephenson
& Aspden (1982), with data from Bennett
et al. (1981a, b) and Cameron el aI.
(1982, 1983).
near Lain No and north of the Bentaro River on the Banda Aceh
Sheet. A chemical analysis of a xenolithic, porphyritic basalt
with pyroxene phenocrysts from this formation is given in Rock
et al. (1982). The Tapaktuan Volcanic Formation occurs in
fault-bounded lenses, within strands of the Anu-Batee Fault
Zone, parallel to the west coast of Aceh north of Tapaktuan
(Fig. 4.13). It consists of massive epidotized andesites and
basalts, commonly porphyritic, and intrusive dykes of a similar
composition. An analysis of hornblende microdiorite from this
formation is given in Rock et al. (1982). The formation also
includes agglomerates, breccias, tufts, red and purple volcaniclas-
tic sandstones and shales, the latter often as slates, and a limestone
member, composed of sparite and calcilutite, all as lenses and
much disrupted by faults.
00oe \
Recent Volcanoes
Langsat Volcanics I~
,
0\
Palaeogene granites
-,-
9 -..
-...-.-.-
Batholith
'Sorik WOYLA GROUP
Batang Natal
9Merapi
River Section,
~ Limestones
NATAL
Belok Gadang Formatior
~ Sikubu Formation
Kanaikan Peridotite/serpentinite
Pasaman Ultramafic
9 V L.~'~_ Complex
Air Bangi,~ "~)~~(.Talam~--~ ~l ~'~ au ~O X LUBUKSIKAPING
-
O~ uator 0 50km ~176
99~ 100~
I
I
Fig. 4.14. The distribution of the Woyla Group in the Natal area, North Sumatra.
Modified from Rock et al. (1983). KFZ, Kanaikan Fault Zone; SGF, Simpang Gambir
Fault.
Age constraints for the Woyla Group in the Natal area are provided
by a limestone sample from the Batang Kanaikan in the Pasaman
inlier which yielded a colonial organism, closely resembling the
samples of Lovfenipora described and illustrated by Yancey &
Arif (1977) from the Indarung area, near Padang, and considered
to be of Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous age (IGS/British
Museum Sample No. TC/J1/Rll01B--Rock et al. 1983).
PRE-TERTIARY STRATIGRAPHY
BNL BNM
~, Limestone (BNL)
d~OMA
0 1 2 3km
. .,~: : :'.
I I l I
........
BNL
Si Gala Gala
Schists
Parlampungan
Volcanics (PV)
Panglong
Melange
Nabana Volcanics .~
~,, BNL .,<,,^,,
Rantobi
Sandstone
... :. :. :. :::
,~,~::: : :: : : :: : ::~ PV
:i:"'" ;fi : i : ~~~;~ Batang
.:::::::::: . (BNM)
,'5"iiiiiiiii:: ~ : STF
' 'i:i:i:i:!:
~q:iiii ! Simarobu
Turbidite
~~i Formation
9 (STF) 44.8
Siltstone
.:::::::GAMBIR~
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.................. lfi
Tambak Baru
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
v, Langsat ,#,-
v, Volcanics v v
....... ,,,, v, i
~ Ranto Sore
Formation
9 . .
...,..
..:\ ....
9.:.:..
Muarasoma Turbidite
Formation (MTF)
..:.:.
""
:.:..
:" :" :" :
MUARASOMA"
NATAL
vvvv,~,vvvv"H"" "-:-:
to" "o,r %." "v" %" "v" v "-,," ",~ %" %" %'* ~ %'. %'.
"~' "o,P %" %," %" ~g' ",/ %~ ",d' %," %-" Nr ",r
~& Location of limestone block ~}~ ' %" ~" %" ",-" %" 'N e %*" V %" %" ~'r %"
with Late Triassic foraminifera %" %" %" %," %" ",e" %r %4 %y %p %r %r
Fig. 4.15. Geological map of the Batang Natal river section, North Sumatra. Inset
shows isotopic dates, from Wajzer et al. (1991). S is serpentinite.
Table 4.1. Correlation of formations in the Woyla Group in the Natal area from
Rock et al. (1983) with the lithotectonic units defined by Wajzer et al. (1991)
*units are listed in approximate order upstream from Langsat with no age
relationship implied.
Rock units in the Indarung area are well dated from fossil
and radiometric age determinations. Radiolaria from chert in the
Ngalau Quarry belong to the Transhsuum hisuikoyense Zone,
of Aalenian, early Mid-Jurassic age (McCarthy et al. 2001).
Lithologies and fbssil content of the limestones in the Lubuk
Peraku section and in the Ngalau and Karang Putih quarries
were described by Yancey & Alif (1977). The limestones are
biosparites, with abundant bioclasts, oolitic calcarenites and
micrites. Molluscan shell fragments, pellets, calcareous algae,
stromatoporoids and scleractinian corals are common components
of the limestones. Among the fossils identified were the (?)
stromatoporoids Actostroma and Lovfenipora. The former is
considered to be restricted to the Late Jurassic, while the latter
is diagnostic of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous. A K-Ar
age date of 105 _+ 3 Ma (Albian, mid-Cretaceous) is reported
from the Golok Tuff in the Lubuk Peraku by Koning & Aulia
(1985) from a Caltex Pacific Indonesia internal report.
Table 4.2. Lithology, environmental setting, structure, metamorphic grade and age
constraints for units in the Batang Natal section (in order upstream from west to
east,
Muarasoma Thin bedded volcaniclastic Upper trench slope Di foliation (S0; D2 folds
Prehnite-
Turbidite turbidites with a basin sediments (F2) on NW-SE axes pumpellyite/
Formation coarser-grained member greenschist
Batu Nabontar Massive recrystallized Open marine shelf Dl tight folds in
Recrystallized Intruded by Batu Manunggal
Limestone limestone, rare fossils limestone interbedded tufts (F1), Batholith. K-Ar
87.0 Ma
Unit fossils show strain
*All units are cut by numerous faults and thrusts. Vertical faults often show
horizontal slickensides indicating wrench fault movements. *K-At age of Manunggal
Batholith from Kanao et al. (1971). All other K-Ar ages from Wajzer et al. (1991).
CHAPTER 4
100~ f ~~00~
~.i .~q~-~ J ~ ~ . ~ ~
9 ~.
::::::::::::::::::::::::
PADANG
l~
C? ::::::::::::::::::::: ~
........... :.::
::::
~/~. ~ "
o 5
~~/D '~ 1'oJ3o' 0~,,,-,. ~ ~~ ~
TALANG
~A, 2579~
Dibawah
Volcano
Te rtia r~ i~st~cs
Indarung Formation
SigunturFormation -
Golok Tuff
Formation
(schematic)
C~slal luffs with sedimentary structures
(water lain) and occasional fine to medium
interbeds
Massive limestone (biosparite) with shell
III
I
I~I~I~
i i i I
I
i i and algae
Pc+~r162 + ~+';
iul i i i i I I Pale coloured volcanics overlain by massive
limestone
+++~:+:C~++:~+o<)+:++~:+,+ Conglomerate with I(X)% carbonate clasts in
sandy shelly carbonate matrix
No exposure
Limestone conglomerate with basal scours
Massive limestone
IllI i i i i i i i i i,,, I
Thinly-bedded limestone with dykes
i i i i i i'
i I i i I ! i
i I i i i i i Shelly oolite -heavily veined
Thinly interbedded with limestones and shelly
marls - boudinage~ marl flowage, veining
Thin pale tuff band in limestone conglomerate
Lubuk Peraku
Formation g Dark marls containing blocks of dark volcanics
and limestone conglomerate (?tectonic)
Nearly t00% carbonate clasts
Conglomerate ? breccia. Poorly sorted, sub-
rounded to sub-angular clasts fi'om mm to
several m in size. Carbonate clasts include
bedded sandy limestone with bivalves, algal
fragments and solotary scleractinian corals
Minor, but significant volcanic clast component Fig. 4.17. Colunmar section through
the Lubuk Peraku
Limestone and the Golok Tuff, measured in the Lubuk Peraku
river section, from McCarthy et al. (2001).
103o00'
Qv
to Bengkulu 60km
9 ,
9 , .
--3o45'
, ,
Q v Quaternary Volcanics
PI Pliocene
Lm Late Miocene
9 , , Middle Miocene
Tom Oligo-Miocene
Eocene
Qv
103~ '
Lm
Qv
Qv
Qv
Qv
9 ,
9 . . . . . . .
._.,_____-.-F
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
9,, .,, .,, ,., ,,.
-..,, ::
~iiilil
. . . . .
Qv ~ .J
-------Faults 0 5 10 15 20km
Pyroxenite I
103o00' 103o15'
I I
Fig. 4.19. The distribution of the Saling, Lingsing and Sepintiang Formations,
correlatives of the Woyla Group, in the Gumai Mountains, South Sumatra, after GRDC
(Gafoer et al. 1994). Neither the cherts nor the limestones have so
far yielded age-diagnostic fossils.
Intrusions in the Garba lnlier. Both the metamorphic Tarap and the
Garba formations are intruded by the Garba Pluton (Fig. 4.7), a
composite body in which an older component has been dated
by the K-At method at 115 � and 102_3Ma (mid-
Cretaceous) and a younger component at 79 � 1.3 Ma and
dioritic rocks into gneisses and deformed the basic dykes. The
alternation of acid and basic intrusion, with contemporaneous
deformation, are characteristic features of the basal parts of a
magmatic arc, where acid and basic magmas are intruded into
an active strike-slip fault zone. This situation is similar to that
which exists beneath Sumatra at the present day where the
modern volcanic arc is built on the active Sumatran Fault Zone.
However, the sense of movement along the present arc is
dextral, in the opposite sense to the sinistral movement along
the Cretaceous arc.