Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Training Module
7QC tools
Pareto Diagram
Histogram
Scatter Diagram
Stratification
7 QC TOOLS
Check sheet
7 QC TOOLS
Measured Counted
Data Data
6. The results
7 QC TOOLS
Example of check sheet
Defect check sheet
Month ,day
4/1 2 3 4
Component
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of
defects
7 QC TOOLS
7 QC TOOLS
Pareto
Pareto Principle
Pareto principle holds good to the present day in various
applications
‗ A few causes lead to many defects;
many causes lead to few defects.‘
The few causes that lead to many defects are the vital few.
The many causes that lead to few defects are the trivial many.
7 QC TOOLS
VITAL FEW
2 Marketing 45 22.5 55.5
3 Plant Maintenance 20 10.0 65.5
4 Finance 15 7.5 73.0
5 Service 12 6.0 79.0
6 Production Engineering 10 5.0 84.0
7 Personnel 8 4.0 88.0
8
9
Information Systems
Stores TRIVIAL
6
5
3.0
2.5
91.0
93.5
10 Research & Development 4 2.0 95.5
11
12
Others
Quality
MANY
4
2
2.0
1.0
97.5
98.5
13 Factory production 2 1.0 99.5
14 Manufacturing Planning 1 0.5 100.0
200 100
7 QC TOOLS
70 %
7 QC TOOLS
Why pareto ?
BRAIN STORMING
BRAIN STORMING
BRAIN STORMING IS A TECHNIQUE TO OBTAIN CREATIVE IDEAS
FROM A GROUP OF PERSONS IN A SHORTEST POSSIABLE TIME
ON AN EFFECT.
BRAIN STORMING PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO BUILD A
CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM
•Round Robin
•Card system
•Free wheeling etc
7 QC TOOLS
7 QC TOOLS
JIS DEFINITION:
ISHIKAWA DIAGRAM
OR
FISH BONE DIAGRAM
METHOD MATERIAL
Sub cause
Sub-sub cause
MAN MACHINE
CAUSES EFFECT
METHOD MATERIAL
Sub cause
PROBLEM
Sub-sub cause
MAN MACHINE
CAUSES EFFECT
7 QC TOOLS
Non-standard
Dust
accumulation
Frequent Serviced by
No communication OF
changes unauthorized persons
Location
No
Improper service XEROX
cleaning No periodical service
Heavy
usage
COPIES
No stabilizer
Specified toner
Power not filled
Limited
machines High Lack of knowledge
fluctuation
Not
Worm & Pinion
Inner cable connected
Improper
Dust deal
H.T
Improper
Missing
Not done Speedo
meter
Worn out
SQ. Drive missing
Not provided Not
Working
Defective Cable
Fixture
Broken
Broken Cut
Bush pressing
Pinion Broken
Needle Female
socket Hammering
Speedometer Method
Defective
7 QC TOOLS
Cost
Stratification
Beeorr Guard Casting
S
tr
a
ti
fi
c
a
ti
o
n
Effect
Causes
7 QC TOOLS
Effect
Causes
7 QC TOOLS
7 QC TOOLS
Definition
Stratification is nothing but the act of dividing data to the fine tune, in
order to make sure of the significance of the assured factors, to the
grass root level.
7 QC TOOLS
Case study
Stratified - Data
208
150 143 Magazines / 287 Copies
No. Of Magazines
125 116
No. Of Copies
100
Numbers
75
54
50
20 21
25
4 1 2 1 1 1 1
0
< 5000 5000 - 100001 - > 25000 200001 - 150001 -
10000 15000 25000 20000
Magazine Value
7 QC TOOLS
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
Problem : Increased Inventory
sheets
Raw Material Bars
Tubes Tubes
Imports
Proprietary Proprietary
pressings
Total Components Fasteners Fasteners
Inventory Rubber
Rubber
Bearings Bearings
Castings
Shop wise Shop wise
Assy wise
Sub-Assy wise Sub-Assy wise
Work in process Stage wise
Machine wise
Rt
Rejections
7 QC TOOLS
CASE STUDY
Machine Machine
A B
Producing
2000 pieces
per day
Source Of Variations
Machine
Material People methods Environment
Total
Process
Variation
7 QC TOOLS
CONSTRUCTING A HISTOGRAM
STEPS
1. Collect data
2. Determine the largest value & smallest value
3. Obtain the range R (The range is the smallest value in the set of
data subtracted from the largest value
4. Divide the range value in to certain number of classes referred to
as K
5. Determine the class width, H = R / K
6. Divide the value of class boundary
7. Construct a frequency table, based on the values compiled
8. Construct Histogram based on the frequency table
7 QC TOOLS
CASE STUDY
Period : wk no. 15 to 20
Material : ms flange collar
STEP 1 Collect data UOM : mm
Thickness : 9 mm + 1.5 mm
CASE STUDY
STEP 2 DETERMINE THRE LARGEST AND SMALLEST VALUE
N = 125
Minimum Maximum
9.9 9.3 10.2 9.4 10.1 9.6 10.1 9.9 9.8 9.3 10.2
9.8 9.8 10.1 9.9 9.7 9.8 10.0 9.9 9.6 9.6 10.1
9.7 9.4 9.6 10.0 9.8 9.9 10.4 10.1 10.0 9.4 10.4
10.2 10.1 9.8 10.1 10.3 10.0 9.8 10.2 10.7 9.8 10.7
9.9 10.7 9.3 10.3 9.9 9.8 9.5 9.8 9.4 9.3 10.7
9.3 10.2 9.2 9.9 9.7 9.9 9.5 9.8 9.4 9.2 10.2
9.0 9.5 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.6 9.3 9.7 9.0 9.8
10.0 9.7 9.4 9.8 9.4 9.6 10.3 10.0 9.8 9.4 10.3
9.5 9.7 10.6 9.5 10.1 10.0 10.1 9.8 9.3 9.5 10.6
9.6 9.4 10.1 9.5 10.1 10.2 9.5 9.8 9.3 9.3 10.2
10.3 9.6 9.7 9.7 10.1 9.8 10.0 9.7 10.0 9.6 10.3
9.5 9.5 9.8 9.9 9.2 10.0 9.7 10.0 9.7 9.2 10.0
9.9 10.4 9.3 9.6 10.2 9.7 9.7 9.7 10.7 9.3 10.7
9.9 10.2 9.8 9.3 9.6 9.5 10.7 9.6 9.3 10.7
9.0 10.7
7 QC TOOLS
CASE STUDY
Method - 1 Method – 2
No.of data points No. of classes No. Of Classes – K =√N
where,
Under 50 5–7
N = No. Of sample
50 – 100 6 – 10
For example, if N = 125
100 – 250 7 – 12
K =√125 = 11
Over 250 10 - 20
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
R (Range)
= H
K (# of classes)
1.7
= 0.17
10
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
35
30
25
USL
Frequency
20
15
10
5
0
8.95 9.15 9.35 9.55 9.75 9.95 10.15 10.35 10.55 10.75
Thickness in mm
HISTOGRAM
40
150
# Of Men
30
100 20
50 10
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
Minutes Height (inches)
Histogram-Manufacturing
Print Density
8
Frequency
6
4
2
0
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Block density of print
7 QC TOOLS
Interpretation Tips
Scatter diagram
7 QC TOOLS
Step 1
Collect paired data (x,y) between which you want to study
the relations & arrange the data in a table. It is desirable
to have at least 30 pairs of data.
7 QC TOOLS
Step 2
Find the maximum & minimum values for both x & y.
Decide the scales of horizontal & vertical axes so that both
the lengths become approximately equal, then the diagram
will be easier to read. Keep the number of unit graduations
between 3 to 10 for each axis & use round numbers to
make it easier to read.
=
7 QC TOOLS
Step 3
Plot the data on the section paper.
Step 4
Enter all necessary items. Make sure that the following
items are included so that anyone besides the maker of
the diagram can understand at a glance:
a) Title of the diagram
b) Time interval
c) Number of pairs of data
d) Title & units of each axis
e) Name (etc) of the person who made the diagram
7 QC TOOLS
Example
A manufacturer of plastic tanks who made them using the
blow moulding process encountered problems with defective
tanks that had thin tank walls. It was suspected that the
variation in air pressure, which varied from day to day, was the
cause of the defective thin walls. The table shows data on
blowing pressure & percent defective. Let us draw a scatter
diagram using this data according to the steps given
previously.
7 QC TOOLS
Data of blowing air pressure & percent defective
of plastic tank
Date Air pressure Percent
(kgf/cm2) Defective
Oct-01 8.6 0.889
2 8.9 0.884
3 8.8 0.874
4 8.8 0.891
5 8.4 0.874
6 8.7 0.886
7 9.2 0.911
8 8.6 0.912
9 9.2 0.895
10 8.7 0.896
11 8.4 0.894
12 8.2 0.864
13 9.2 0.922
14 8.7 0.909
15 9.4 0.905
16 8.7 0.892
17 8.5 0.877
18 9.2 0.885
19 8.5 0.866
20 8.3 0.896
21 8.7 0.896
22 9.3 0.928
23 8.9 0.886
24 8.9 0.908
25 8.3 0.881
26 8.7 0.882
27 8.9 0.904
28 8.7 0.912
29 9.1 0.925
30 8.7 0.872
7 QC TOOLS
Step 1
As seen in the table, we have 30 pairs of data.
Step 2
In this example, let blowing air pressure be indicated by X
(horizontal axis), & percent defective by Y (vertical axis).
Then,
The maximum value of X: Xmax = 9.4 (kgf/cm2)
The minimum value of X : Xmin = 8.2 (kgf/cm2)
The maximum value of Y: Ymax = 0.928 (%)
The minimum value of Y : Ymin = 0.864 (%)
7 QC TOOLS
We mark off
the horizontal axis in 0.5(kgf/cm2) intervals, from 8.0 to
9.5 (kgf/cm2) and
the vertical axis in0.01(%) intervals, from 0.85 to 0.93(%)
Step 3
Plot the data.
7 QC TOOLS
0.93
0.92
0.91
0.9
0.89
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.85
8 8.5 9 9.5
7 QC TOOLS
Step 4
Enter the time interval of the sample obtained (oct.1 – oct 30) number of
samples (n = 30), horizontal axis (blowing air pressure [kgf/cm2]), vertical
axis (percent defective [%]), and title of diagram (scatter diagram of
blowing air pressure & percent defective).
0.92 n=30
0.91
0.9
0.89
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.85
8 8.5 9 9.5
35 350
30 300
25 250
20 200
Series1 Series1
15 150
10 100
5 50
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400
40 500
400
30
300
20 Series1 Series1
200
10 100
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400
700
600
500
400
Series1
300
200
100
0
0 100 200 300 400
No correlation
7 QC TOOLS
Thank you