Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Weisman
Brief Fact Summary. The Defendant, Rachel Weisman (Defendant), alleges that
a school sponsored, non-denominational prayer offered at a public school
graduation violated the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment of the United
States Constitution (Constitution).
Synopsis of Rule of Law. A public school cannot sponsor clerics to conduct even
a non-denominational prayer as part of a graduation ceremony as the
Constitution guarantees that government may not coerce anyone to support or
participate in religion or its exercise or otherwise act in a way, which establishes
a state religion, or tends to do so.
Facts.
Issue. Does the inclusion of clergy who offer prayers at official public school
ceremonies violate the Establishment Clause?
Held. Yes The principal’s act of giving the cleric guidelines for the prayer means
the principal directed and controlled the content of the prayer in direct
violation of the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, which prohibits the
preferring one religion over another.
The court stated that the question is not the good faith of the school in
attempting to make the prayer acceptable to most persons, but the legitimacy
of its undertaking that enterprise at all, when the object is to produce a prayer
to be used in a formal religious exercise, which students, for all practical
purposes, are obliged to attend.