Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-1381
v. )
)
US BANK, et al )
)
Defendants/Appellees )
)

APPELLANT NOTICE RE: CRIMINAL AND BAR COMPLAINTS FILED WITH

THE FBI AND BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS AGAINST REPRESENTING

ATTORNEYS

APPELLANT DISCLOSURE

The gravity of serious legal issues addressed in this Appeal (lower court Docket No. 15-cv-

11880), and in the RELATED Appeal,1 include (but are not limited to): 1.) evidenced

allegations of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3 of the Constitution, and 2.)

Economic Espionage pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832, which are believed to impact matters of

National Security. The evidenced allegations against referenced officers of the Court

include CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT - On March 19, 2018, Criminal Complaints were

filed with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against the TEN (10) identified Federal

1
The related Appeal references HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-cv-
2074 (Also, lower court Docket No. 17-cv-11109).
1
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

(Circuit and District) Court Judges. Therefore, copies of this NOTICE are necessarily sent via

email, social media and/or certified mail to the:

1. Executive Office of the President (EOP);

2. US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz;

3. US Attorney General - Jeff Sessions;

4. Members of the US Senate and House of Representatives;

5. House and Senate Judiciary Committees;

6. House Oversight Committee;

7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);

8. Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief

Program (SIGTARP);

9. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);

10. Federal Trade Commission (FTC);

11. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS);

12. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

A copy will also be made available to the PUBLIC, as this judiciary’s effort to “promote

public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process,” has irrefutably been

compromised. By informing the Public, ALL AMERICANS serve here as WITNESS. Parties

are additionally informed for documentation purposes, and out of the Appellant’s continued

concerns for personal safety/security.

2
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 3 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

The Appellant - Mohan A. Harihar, a pro se litigant, brings to the attention of this Court

evidenced attorney misconduct associated with this litigation: These evidenced claims are

considered CLEAR violations to Attorney Rules of Professional Conduct – AT MINIMUM,

Rule 8.4: MISCONDUCT (a) thru (f), and also (h). As described below, the evidenced

allegations are considered both civil and criminal in nature. Therefore, 1.) Criminal complaints

are filed with the FBI2 and 2.) BAR Complaints are now filed with the Board of BAR

Overseers against the following attorneys:

a.) Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq - Rich May PC, 176 Federal St, Boston, MA 02110;

b.) David Glod, Esq - Rich May PC, 176 Federal St, Boston, MA 02110;

c.) Kevin Patrick Polansky, Esq - Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, 1 Post

office Sq, 30th Flr, Boston, MA 01960;

d.) Matthew T. Murphy, Esq - Casner & Edwards, 303 Congress St, Boston, MA

02210;

e.) Kurt R. McHugh, Esq - Harmon Law Offices PC, 150 California St, Newton MA

02458;

f.) Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq - MA AGO, 1 Ashburton Pl, 20th Fl, Boston, MA 02108;

g.) David E. Fialkow, Esq - K&L Gates LLP, State Street Financial Ctr, 1 Lincoln St,

Boston, MA 02111;

h.) Jeffrey S. Patterson, Esq - K&L Gates LLP, State Street Financial Ctr, 1 Lincoln

St, Boston, MA 02111;

i.) Martha Coakley, Esq - Foley Hoag LLP, 155 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA 02210;

2 See Attachment A
3
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 4 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

j.) Peter Haley, Esq - Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, 1 Post office Sq,

30th Flr, Boston, MA 01960.

This Court is aware, the Appellant has now raised evidenced claims of Treason under

ARTICLE III against seven (7) officers of the court. As required by Federal Law, the

President of The United States has been notified of these evidenced acts of Treason. The

accused attorneys have also witnessed these referenced acts of Treason and have consciously

chosen to remain silent, constituting multiple acts of MISPRISION of TREASON under 28

U.S.C. 2382. Additional claims evidenced against the accused include (but are not limited to) the

following:

1. FRCP 60(b)(3) Fraud on the Court, which stands as a matter of record as

UNOPPOSED;

2. Civil/Criminal RICO Violations (at minimum, 18 U.S. Code § 1964);

3. Economic Espionage pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832;

4. 18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to Defraud the United States.

Based on these evidenced criminal allegations and the Appellant’s interpretation of the law, the

accused attorney(s) CANNOT seek refuge under litigation privilege, sovereign, judicial or any

other immunity. This Court is ALREADY aware that the Appellant has evidenced IN FULL

PUBLIC VIEW – documented COLLUSION between: 1.) Bank Attorneys, 2.) The US

Attorney’s Office, 3.) MA Attorney General’s Office AND the Boston BAR (See

Attachment B – The West LegalEDcenter Course entitled, “After the Bubble Bursts”).3

There remains valid concern as to the depth of this misconduct. As documented by court

3 See Attachment B
4
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 5 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

record(s), the Appellant has a continued fear for his personal safety and security as he seeks

Civil, Criminal AND Professional accountability for these EVIDENCED claims.

With this Notice, the Appellant states that he intends to file suit against referenced attorneys,

either by amending the existing complaint, or by filing a new complaint. The Appellant will seek

to obtain relief in equity through civil damages, declaratory, injunctive (and any other) relief

deemed appropriate by the Court. As with the existing litigation, the reimbursement of legal fees

will also be sought.

Referenced attorneys are respectfully given the opportunity to reach a mutual agreement with the

Appellant. A RESPONSE is respectfully requested on or before April 27, 2018.

For documentation purposes, after sending a copy of the NOTICE to the attention of The

President, confirmation of its receipt is attached (See Attachment C) with the filed Court copy.

If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this notice, the Appellant is happy to provide

additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the presence of an

independent court reporter.

Respectfully submitted this 9th Day of April, 2018

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

5
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 6 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

Attachment A

6
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 7 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

7
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 8 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

The TEXT BOX of the FBI Criminal Complaint states the following:

I, Mohan A. Harihar, complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
DEFENDANTS: 1.) Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq; 2.) David Glod, Esq; 3.) Kevin Patrick Polansky, Esq; 4.)
Matthew T. Murphy, Esq; 5.) Kurt R. McHugh, Esq; 6.) Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq.; 7.) David E.
Fialkow, Esq; 8.) Jeffrey S. Patterson, Esq; 9.) Martha Coakley, Esq; 10.) Peter Haley
CONTACT INFORMATION: Atty’s Loeb/Glod – Rich May PC, 176 Federal St, Boston, MA 02110;
Atty’s Polansky/Haley – Nelson Mullins LLP, 1 Post office Sq, 30th Flr, Boston, MA 01960; Atty
Murphy – Casner & Edwards, 303 Congress St, Boston, MA 02210; Atty McHugh – Harmon Law
Offices PC, 150 California St, Newton MA 02458; Atty Boodoo – MA AGO, 1 Ashburton Pl, 20th
Fl, Boston, MA 02108; Atty’s Fialkow/Patterson – K&L Gates LLP, State Street Financial Ctr, 1
Lincoln St, Boston, MA 02111; Atty Coakley – Foley Hoag LLP, 155 Seaport Blvd, Boston, MA
02210.
ALLEGATIONS AND SUPPORTING FACTS: The crimes alleged against referenced attorneys have
occurred in the timeline associated with the litigation: HARIHAR v. US BANK et al, Appeal No.
17-1381 (Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880) and HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal
No. 17-2074 (Lower Court Docket No. 17-cv-11109).
The evidenced allegations conclusively show that (at minimum) these attorneys have
personally witnessed acts of Treason under Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution, and have
failed/refused to report these crimes, as required by Federal law. Their failure(s) to report
Treason and other witnessed acts of Judicial Misconduct additionally contributes to existing
CONSPIRACY (and other) claims as stated in the referenced litigation. By their actions (or lack
thereof) these parties are believed to have contributed to the Misappropriation of a Trade
Secret (IP) designed to assist the United States with economic growth/repair associated with
the US Foreclosure Crisis. The complainant believes that upon further investigation, additional
claims against these atty’s are likely. The Complainant maintains the right to expand upon/file
new claims if deemed necessary.
STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CAUSE: The Complainant states that these facts establish probable
cause indicating that (at minimum) the following crimes have occurred: MISPRISION OF
TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2382; 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to
defraud United States; and ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE (Economic Espionage Act) 18 U.S. Code §
1831.
Supporting Documents are part of the Court record(s) associated with the referenced litigation
and include judicial misconduct complaints/petitions filed with the Office of the Circuit
Executive. A separate complaint has also been filed with the Director of the Administrative
Offices of US Courts and Board of BAR Overseers (MA).
Please be advised, since this matter involves evidenced claims of TREASON and matters
perceived to impact National Security, the Complainant (by his interpretation of Federal Law)
has necessarily communicated these claims to the President, members of Congress and other
appropriate agencies. The PUBLIC has also been copied out of concerns for personal safety
and security. Copies of this criminal complaint will be delivered to the President's attention,
filed with the Court and appropriate agencies.

8
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 9 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

9
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 10 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

Attachment B

10
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 11 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

My CLE Knowledge
Welcome Search Catalog State Requirements Content Partners
CenterSM

RSS Feeds | Test Your Computer | Help | Shopping Cart | Contact Us | Sign In

OnePass Sign-in Program Details

After the Bubble-Bursts:

SIGN IN Mortgage and Foreclosure
Issues in Criminal and Civil
Litigation Price: $140.00*
New User Registration
Member Price: $115.00
Forgot Username/Password
Video Help This program is no
longer available.
Content
Partner: Boston
Bar Association

Browse Programs

* Applicable Membership or Subscription discounts E-mail a

will be added in your shopping cart colleague about
CLE
this program.
Description:
Accredited For Accreditation:
Specialty Credits Criminal and civil litigation in mortgage and foreclosure
State-Specific Law cases is an area in which legal issues are rapidly
Practice Areas evolving, stakes are high and uncertainty is rampant. AK, AR, AZ, CA,
Content Partners As a result, a variety of different areas of practice CO, CPE-NASBA,
overlap for many clients and practitioners. FL, ME, MO, MT,
ND, NJ, NY-
Core Business and This program will focus on criminal and regulatory EXPER, OK, PA,
Professional Skills issues emerging from the collapse of the national real RI, VI, VT, WV
estate and secondary mortgage markets. Among the
Paralegal Studies topics to be explored are: the uncovering of widespread Alaska
fraud in the origination of mortgages prior to the
Subscriptions collapse, and the priorities of state and federal Total Credits: 2.5
authorities in prosecuting such cases; civil and criminal Specialty Credits:
Thomson Reuters Product authorities’ priorities in confronting fraud in connection Status: Reciprocal
Trainings with post-collapse “foreclosure rescue” transactions; Credit Available
and criminal and regulatory issues relating to banking Expiration: N/A
RSS Feeds and foreclosure practices in connection with mortgages Training
held in “pooled” investment vehicles. Type: Online

West
Attendees will gain insight into the priorities of leading LegalEdcenter
Live Program Calendar prosecution officials, including the Attorney General
and the United States Attorney in mortgage fraud and
provides
foreclosure cases. Learn about important practical accreditation as
© ‹‹‹ April 2018 ››› issues and valuable strategies for criminal defense described here.
S M T W TH F S attorneys in this area, including the likely impact of new You may be able
regulations at the state and federal level in the area of to self apply for
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 consumer protection in connection with mortgages. credits in states
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Two panels of experts will present some of the latest not listed.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 breaking developments in this area, including the
impact of the SJC’s ground-breaking Ibanez decision. Check your state
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
requirements and
29 30 get contact
Panel I: Post-Crash Criminal Prosecutions
information.
All Programs for This Month
• Property Flips

11
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 12 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

• Foreclosure “Rescue” Schemes Speakers:

About Us • Lender and Borrower Misconduct
• Fraud in the Secondary Market
• Defending Real Estate Professionals • James H.
About Us O'Brien -
Assistant
Panel II: The Regulatory Response
Attorney General
CLE Mobile - Massachusetts
• Consumer Fraud Protections in the Dodd Office of the
Frank Act Attorney General
Content Partners • Lender Liability • Paul Levenson -
Assistant US
• Post-Ibanez Litigation
Attorney (Panel I
Moderator) - US
FAQ
Program Co-Chairs: Attorney’s Office
• Jeffrey S.
Press Releases • Juliane Balliro, Esq., Partner, Nelson Mullins Patterson, Esq.
- Nelson Mullins
Riley & Scarborough LLP
Riley &
• Paul G. Levenson, Esq., Assistant U.S. Scarborough
Site Features Attorney, The United States Attorney's Office LLP
District of Massachusetts • Juliane Balliro -
Partner (Panel II
Video Help Moderator) -
Nelson Mullins
Riley &
Criminal Law & Procedure, Real Scarborough
Practice Areas: LLP
Related Programs Estate Law
• James Patrick
Online Media Dowden -
Video
Type: Assistant U.S
Find more programs in same
Attorney - US
practice area(s)
Production Date: 03/28/2011 4:00 PM EDT Attorney's Office
Find more programs from this • Thomas P.
Level: Intermediate Quinn, Esq. -
content partner
Pierce Atwood,
Category: Standard LLP
Duration: 2 Hours, 30 Minutes

Online Format: Live

Click here for information on subscription discounts and

Group Viewing opportunities.

Purchase of this product provides online access for

180 days. If you are purchasing a live webcast, you will
receive complimentary access to the on demand
version for 180 days once it becomes available. Please
note that the on demand and podcast versions may, or
may not be accredited in your state.

If you intend to take a course for CLE credit, please

make sure your state is listed in the "Accreditation"
section to the upper right of the program description.
Accreditation displayed is unique to the purchased
program format (live conference, live webcast, on
demand, podcast). Credit totals listed for live
conferences are the maximum credits available. Credits
issued will be based upon actual time in
attendance. Credit totals for other formats are for

12
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 13 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

complete programs. Partial credit is not available for

any online or downloadable format.

West LegalEdcenter will not provide accreditation

for states not listed.

This product is intended for individual use by the

named purchaser. Group viewings for online programs
may be arranged for five or more attorneys within the
same organization prior to viewing by emailing
sales@westlegaledcenter.com.

People who bought this program also

bought:
There are no current recommendations

This product is designed to provide information in regard to the subject matter

covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in
rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or
other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional
person should be sought.

Page Disclaimer

No page disclaimer found.

Home | Search | CLE Requirements | Site Map

Content Partners | Technical Requirements | Help | Contact Us
About Us | Privacy Statement
RSS Feeds
© 2018 Thomson Reuters
(c757qnk.int.thomsonreuters.com)

13
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 14 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

Attachment C

14
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 15 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

15
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 16 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

16
Case: 17-1381 Document: 00117275411 Page: 17 Date Filed: 04/09/2018 Entry ID: 6162100

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 9, 2018 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court
using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following registered
CM/ECF users:

Jeffrey B. Loeb
David Glod
David E. Fialkow
Kevin Patrick Polansky
Matthew T. Murphy
Kurt R. McHugh
Jesse M. Boodoo

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

17