Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Human resource is the element within a company which deals with the human aspects/needs of
workers. It is that department or function of an organization which lays down policies,
procedures, activity pertaining to human capital of an organization.
Key functions
Evolution of HR
It started in the 19th century when the concept of personnel management came into existence. At
that point it was only about welfare of the employees in relation to sickness, moral welfare etc.
Then came the need for personnel management in industries for maintaining labor relations. But
the role was small which required making policies to increase productivity. It further evolved
and required personnel managers to look into aspects like labor welfare, working conditions,
incentives etc. which facilitate motivation, promotion, increasing morale, performance appraisal.
Such changes and importance given to personnel management gave rise to the concept of Human
Resources and its evolution to the present state.
HR scenario pre-recession
This was one the healthiest job market according to employers recruiting in 2007-2008. Overall,
according to Job Outlook 2008, an annual survey of college recruiters, employers hired 16
percent more new college graduates in 2007-08 than they did in 2006-07.
The growing demand for new graduates was as a result of an increased demand for employers’
products and services; in addition, employees were retiring or nearing retirement age, and other
employees were leaving organizations for new opportunities. Employers expected the good job
market to continue or perhaps get better.
This was the time when the hiring activities by various businesses, industry took an aggressive
turn. They started employing more employees than they needed. Reason as cited before was
unprecedented growth of businesses. The markets were looking up and every company was in an
expansion mode. They wanted add more and more human capital to achieve this.
In 2007-2008 especially in India the markets were on a boom resulting in high demand for
employees of various backgrounds. Sectors like insurance, I.T, healthcare, hospitality were
aiming for a high growth which resulted in a high demand for human capital. Thus, a major role
of HR during these times called for hiring and acquiring attractive talent, employee retention,
appraisals and promotions.
HR scenario during recession
Recession started with the real estate bubble bursting in the U.S.A. The effects were felt world
over. Big businesses collapsing, stock markets tumbling, grim markets could be seen all over.
More than 7 million jobs were lost in this 2 year period. 7 million is a big figure, and compare
that to just around 1 million jobs lost in the previous recession in 2001. At present, the
unemployment rate is around 10%. Even though the negative effect of the recession seems to be
lessening, that rate isn't going to come down much even for the next couple of years. In fact, it
will go up to somewhere around 11% in this current year. The job market will continue to remain
weak. Another factor is that in this calculation of 10% unemployment, it does not include
millions of individuals who have just stopped or given up looking for work. So the actual rate of
unemployment is much higher. Low consumer confidence and tight credit will keep consumer
spending in check, which in turn will stop employers from adding staff in significant numbers.
At this time the companies entrusted the HR managers with the following jobs:
Every company was pursuing cost reductions in their operations. HR departments started
formulating policies that would reduce costs related to human capital. This involved:-
• Reducing training costs by providing it to only performing employees who were capable
of better returns
Most of the time, economic downturns are short lived and organizations have to look at the
bigger picture of long term growth in sight. The companies that realized this also realized that if
they dismiss or lay-off employees during recession, not only is there a cost, but they will have to
appoint someone to take their place when the going gets better which costs a lot more in the long
run.
In troubled times it is important to ensure that you have got the right people working for
you. Thus to ensure this the companies saw to it that they conducted recruitment process
with rigorous thoroughness.
Limit activities with limited business purposes. Reduce expenses that don’t add value.
Instead include low-cost but high impact benefits at a time when the rest of the business
world is cutting back.
The successful companies were honest with their employees about their difficult times.
They let them know what the true financial picture of the company was. When such
things were communicated the employees they often are willing to make cuts and
changes as they understand the facts.
Companies called for giving feedback to their employees whenever the can.
Acknowledgement of a job well done and consider non-cash incentives. This makes a big
difference to employee motivation. Irrespective of the financial climate it’s reasonable to
ask employees to do their best.
• Keep on training the employees
Companies who weather the storm perform better because they keep up their training. It
does not have to be expensive classroom training. The companies focused on cost
effective alternatives like arranging virtual classrooms, online training, encourage
employees to be seconded on to other projects or work outside their usual sphere of
activity.
The past year has undoubtedly brought many changes and challenges to both employers and
employees. Layoffs, pay cuts and furloughs have been widespread, thus contributing to a job
market saturated with qualified candidates competing for fewer jobs. Despite this steep
competition among candidates, employers struggle to find professionals with in-demand skill
sets.
Along with these continued battles, employers face a new challenge: ensuring their companies
are prepared when the economy does make an inevitable turnaround, which will give them a
competitive advantage.
A new survey, the 2009 EDGE Report from Robert Half International and CareerBuilder,
provides answers to many of the lingering questions surrounding today's economy and job
market: Where will jobs be added first in the recovery? What challenges will employers face in
recruitment? How will compensation be impacted? And how will employers retain the talent
they've preserved during this difficult time?
To take advantage of an improving economy, employers that cut staffing levels extensively are
taking a close look at the core skills needed in new hires in order to rebuild their rosters once the
economic recovery takes hold.
Fifty-three percent of employers said they plan to hire full-time employees in the next 12
months, while 39 percent will add part-time employees, according to a new survey. Forty percent
will hire contract, temporary or project professionals.
Here are several key other findings from the report:
When the economy does start to rebound, respondents said technology, customer service and
sales departments will add positions first, followed by marketing/creative, business development,
human resources and accounting/finance.
In the meantime, hiring managers continue to appreciate employees who can perform multiple
functions. Employers cited multitasking, initiative and creative problem-solving as the most
valuable characteristics in ideal new hires.
Retaining talent
Although many business leaders have plans to add new employees to their organizations in the
coming months, they also have to consider how their decisions during the financial crisis have
impacted job satisfaction and loyalty of their current staff.
Fifty-five percent of workers polled have plans to change careers, find a new employer or go
back to school once the economy recovers. Forty-nine percent said that the most effective way to
keep them on board will be with pay increases; in fact, 28 percent plan to ask for a raise.
Employers are aware that competitive pay and benefits will play a critical role in retaining talent.
Forty percent of employers said that they plan to increase pay when the economy improves and
20 percent said they hope for better benefits and perks.
A common complaint from job seekers is the amount of time the hiring process takes; however,
this is one area where employers won't budge. Employers say that in order to avoid costly hiring
mistakes, it's necessary to take their time reviewing and screening a high volume of résumés, and
also to carefully evaluate those invited for interviews.
• Shortage of talent
The shortage of people with employable skill-sets remains a major concern across industries. As
many as 85% of the organizations in this study admitted, that they face shortage of talent with
the desired level of skills required to fulfill certain roles and responsibilities. Our research further
reveals that almost all the participating organizations from pharmaceuticals and engineering
industries were experiencing shortage of talent. The manufacturing industry too experiences an
acute shortage of technical skills that can be readily deployable in ongoing projects.
While looking at the media, entertainment and services sectors, we noted that about 35% of the
participants were satisfied with the availability of manpower for their organizations.
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
FeelingOf Shortage Of Talent
0%
AcrossIndustries
Attrition and Retention
At this juncture, when a host of organizations are trimming their workforces to bring down costs,
attrition does not appear to be a primary concern. However, observation of empirical data in this
regard can assist an organization to gear up for the future and to retain the much-needed talent.
The average rate of attrition is relatively moderate at 19% across all industries; though the hard-
to-digest fact is that the media and services industry had been witnessing as much as 30% rate of
attrition - even higher than that of the IT/ ITeS industry. This trend is followed by skill-intensive
industries of pharmaceuticals (26%) and engineering (21%) as well.
• Paradigm shift
The Indian economy has been led by its robust services sector in the past two decades and this
sector has made its mark as a knowledge-driven sector enjoying innumerable distinctions and
acknowledgements from across the world.
The key question amidst this scenario remains intact though - what is the key factor behind
employee motivation and retention? Well, traditionally one can say it is incentives. But factually
it is not! This research illuminates an interesting fact: opportunities of career development and
job content are the top two factors that affect employee motivation and retention in an
organization.
• Hiring Strategy
An increasing number of organisations realise the need and merits of changing their hiring
strategies in line with changes in business dynamics. Our research indicates that it is the junior
management band that has the maximum rate of employee turnover. One of the obvious reasons
is that the employees in this cadre have maximum room to move, both vertically and
horizontally. They tend to switch jobs even if there is a noticeable change in work profile and do
not pay much heed to their industry or domain specialisation. Especially, resources with readily
deployable skills tend to move much faster than those who are more inclined towards learning
and development. Perhaps this is why as opposed to hunting for employees who are too smart to
perform a job; employers now tend to hire candidates from regional colleges and even consider
approaching smaller cities for recruiting employees who are more inclined towards learning and
development.
• Learning as incentive
In knowledge-based industries, employees are more inclined towards gaining expertise and
developing their careers. Training, thus not only enables them to perform their duties more
efficiently but also helps an organization to retain talent for a longer duration of time. However,
the training budget as a percentage of total revenues is still significantly low. A meager 1 percent
of total revenue has been allocated for training, as an average across the 5 industries of
engineering, manufacturing, media and services, pharmaceuticals and IT/ ITeS. Our study found
that engineering, pharmaceuticals and IT/ ITeS companies spent an average of 60, 48 and 38
hours respectively, in training every year. This was noticeably low in skill-intensive industry
such as manufacturing (21 hours).
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20% Identification
0% Acknowledgement
eS
g
g
es
s
rin
ag
in
al
ic
/IT
er
tic
tu
er
rv
ne
IT
Av
eu
ac
Se
gi
uf
ac
En
&
an
ia
ar
M
ed
Ph
• Behavioural training
For employers, behavioral training is as important as technical training. As much as 37% of the
training budget is spent on behavioral training and the rest is spent on conducting job related/
technical training. Expenditure on behavioral training is understandably increasing significantly
in public-facing industries of media and services. The three most effective ways to develop high
potential talent across industries as shared by participating organisations are as follows:
- involvement of high-potential employees in special projects
- higher responsibility being given to high potential employees through enriched job
content
- mentoring sessions with senior management of the organization
Performance and efficiency optimization
120%
100%
80%
60% SourcesOf Performance
40% Assessment
20% Column1
0%
Column2
• Reward to motivate
Provision of annual incentives has become an increasingly effective tool for maintaining higher
levels of employee motivation, and more and more organizations are finding it to be an important
tool for rewarding their high performers. Meanwhile, the average variable pay-out across
industries stands at 19% of the CTC. Media and services industry are paying significantly higher
than the market average, whereas the pharmaceutical companies pay the minimum of all among
the covered industry segments. Typically annual incentives are aimed at rewarding past
performance only, but there is an increasing trend in the industry that shows that corporate
houses tend to link it to the potential of an employee along with past performance.
• Performance appraisal
The performance appraisal process should be viewed as a diagnostic exercise for understanding
employee needs and aspirations, providing clarity about roles and responsibilities and hence
keeping them motivated and engaged with their work. As for the process flow, it is largely done
by the manager, the employee himself and the manager's manager, at most workplaces. The 360
degree feedback (from all across the organization) for an employee is not very prevalent still, but
it has been used more as an input for senior level performance evaluations. Out of the
organizations that seek feedback from customers, 75% belong to the IT/ ITeS sector.
• Goal setting
As for the appraisal process, employees actively participate in setting their goals against which
they are evaluated.
About 89% organizations in our study said that employees are part of the goal-setting exercise.
On the other hand, almost 81% of the organizations provide feedback to employees at the end of
the appraisal process.