Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 46, NO.

2, APRIL 1997 515

A Broadband Free-Space Dielectric Properties


Measurement System at Millimeter Wavelengths
Gerhard L. Friedsam and Erwin M. Biebl, Senior Member, IEEE

Abstract— A free-space system operating in the 75 GHz to


95 GHz range for measurement of the complex permittivity
of matter is presented. The complex transmission coefficient of
a parallel polarized quasiplane wave through a planar sample
is determined for different incidence angles. The quasiplane
wave is realized by a collimated Gaussian beam. The complex
permittivity is subsequently calculated from the measured data
by applying a nonlinear least-squares method. Errors induced
by multiple reflections between the transmitting and receiving Fig. 1. Quasioptical setup for measuring the complex transmission coeffi-
horn antennas are removed by a time–domain gating technique. cient.
The design of the quasioptical measurement setup is based on
Gaussian beam optics. A dielectric lens collimates the beam of the
transmitting horn antenna for minimization of diffraction effects
at the edges of the sample. In order to verify the Gaussian beam
and thin lens approximations at millimeter wavelengths, the far-
field pattern of the horn antenna and the dielectric lens system
has been measured. The performance of the measurement setup
has been tested using glass samples.
Index Terms—Complex permittivity, dielectric properties, free-
space method, free-space transmission measurements, Gaussian
beam, millimeter wave frequencies, quasioptical method.

I. INTRODUCTION

I N THE millimeter wave range the complex permittivity


of matter can be determined by using either dielectric
waveguide, cavity resonators, open resonators, or free-space Fig. 2. 3-dB beamwidth 1=2 of the horn-lens-combination over 75–95 GHz:
theory (——) and measurement (- - - -).
techniques. Free-space methods are excellently suited for the
broadband measurement of the complex permittivity and per-
meability [1]–[3]. This technique is based on the measurement 75 GHz to 95 GHz range by measuring the transmission coef-
of the transmission coefficient and/or the reflection coefficient ficient for different angles of incidence. The application of the
of planar samples for different polarization states, angles method is demonstrated using glass samples. The influence of
of incidence, frequencies, and thicknesses of the sample. the measurement errors of the complex transmission coefficient
Free-space methods are nondestructive and can be used for and of the sample thickness on the accuracy of the proposed
measuring a wide range of materials including gases, liquids, method is discussed.
and solids.
The major disadvantages of the free-space methods are II. MEASUREMENT SET-UP
diffraction effects around the sample edges and multiple re- The design of the quasioptical measurement setup is based
flections between the horn antennas. The diffraction effects at on Gaussian beam optics [4], [5]. Fig. 1 shows the measure-
the edges of the sample can be minimized by using horn-lens- ment setup. The free-space transmission path consists of two
combinations as transmitters and receivers. With broadband corrugated horn antennas and a dielectric lens. The aperture
measurement systems it is possible to remove the multiple radius and flare angle of the corrugated horn antennas are
reflections by means of a time domain gating technique. 13.5 mm and 10.11 , respectively. The ratio of focal distance
In this paper, we present a broadband free-space measure- ( 210 mm) to diameter of the lens ( 131 mm) is
ment system to determine the complex permittivity in the equal to 1.6. In order to confirm the Gaussian beam as well
Manuscript received June 20, 1996; revised October 1, 1996. This work as the thin lens approximations, the -plane radiation pattern
was supported by the Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung e.V. with assistance of the of the lens-horn combination was measured at 21 frequencies.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Wissenschaft. From the measured data the far-field 3 dB beamwidth of the
The authors are with Lehrstuhl für Hochfrequenztechnik, Technische Uni-
versität München, 80333 München, Germany. electrical field distribution was determined. Fig. 2 shows the
Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9456(97)01623-9. measured (solid line) and the theoretical values (broken line) of
0018–9456/97$10.00  1997 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on December 8, 2008 at 23:05 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
516 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 46, NO. 2, APRIL 1997

the 3 dB beamwidth. The deviation between the theoretical and least-squares method. The error function is defined as
the measured values is less then 0.5 . The 3 dB beamwidth
of the collimated beam is smaller than 1.7 over the whole
frequency range from 75 GHz to 95 GHz. By the collimated
Gaussian beam a plane wave is approximated. In order to
minimize diffraction effects the diameter of the sample is (6)
larger than eight times the radius of the collimated Gaussian
beam and the sample is placed near the beam waist. The
radius of the collimated Gaussian beam at the position of where , and , are magnitude and phase of
the sample holder is about 12 over the entire frequency the theoretical and measured transmission coefficient for an
range. The sample holder is mounted on a precision motor incidence angle , respectively. The terms and are
driven rotary stage. In order to avoid extraneous reflections the residuals for each angle. By investigating the distribution
into the measurement path, the area around the transmission of the residuals the consistency of the measurement data can
path is covered with absorbing material. An automatic network be controlled.
analyzer HP8510 is used to analyze the received signals. Now a similar nonlinear least-squares estimate is calculated
The measurement set-up and acquisition of measured data by using another error function
is controlled by a computer program. With this set-up the
complex transmission coefficient of planar samples can be (7)
measured at different angles of incidence and for both parallel
and perpendicular polarization in the 75 GHz to 95 GHz range.
which takes only the measured magnitudes into account. By
comparing the complex permittivity values obtained by the
III. THEORY two nonlinear least-squares estimates, the consistency of the
The transmission coefficient of a parallel polarized plane results can be checked. Particularly systematic errors of the
electromagnetic wave through an infinitely wide slab with the measurement set-up can be identified.
complex material parameters and Uncertainties of the complex permittivity measurement de-
and thickness for an incidence angle is given by [6] pend on the thickness of the sample. From computer sim-
ulations using (1)–(6) it can be shown, that the minimum
measurement error corresponds to and the maxi-
(1) mum measurement error to , respectively,
where is the wavelength in the sample and
where is the number of half wavelengths in the sample.

(2)
IV. RESULTS
and The measurement system has been tested using a glass
(3) sample with a thickness of mm. For
calibration the sample is removed from the transmission path.
This calibration procedure eliminates only the errors due to
is the reflection coefficient for parallel polarization of a plane the frequency response. Using a time domain gating technique
electromagnetic wave incident on a dielectric boundary. is the influence of multiple reflections between the transmitting
the free-space wavelength. and receiving horns and between the sample and the receiving
The measured transmission coefficient is normalized with horn can be minimized. Fig. 3 shows the measured complex
respect to the amplitude and phase readings obtained by the transmission coefficient for the incidence angles 10 , 20 , 30 ,
calibration procedure. The resulting phase shift must be taken and 40 . The uncertainty in the magnitude and in the phase is
into account by less than 0.025 dB and 0.6 , respectively, due to residual
load and source mismatch.
(4) The complex transmission coefficient has been measured at
122 different angles of incidence for the parallel polarization
Finally, we obtain the theoretical transmission coefficient in the 75 GHz to 95 GHz range at 401 frequency points. In
for the measurement system order to minimize the influence of the wave reflected from the
sample and the diffraction effects at the edges of the sample
holder on the measured data, the measurements have been
(5) limited to angles of incidence within the range 10
40 . Fig. 4 shows the measured complex permittivity for a
The complex permittivity cannot be expressed glass sample. In order to identify systematic measurement
explicitly in terms of , , and . It is determined by fitting errors, we compare the values of the complex permittivity
the theoretical model (5) to the measured values of magnitude calculated from the magnitude and phase information of the
and phase of the transmission coefficient using a nonlinear measured data (solid line) with those values calculated only

Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on December 8, 2008 at 23:05 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
FRIEDSAM AND BIEBL: BROADBAND FREE-SPACE DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES 517

(a)
(a)

(b)
Fig. 4. Calculated permittivity for glass over 75 GHz to 95 GHz, using the
(b) measured magnitude and phase (—— ) or only the magnitude (- - - -): (a)
Fig. 3. Measured transmission coefficient over 75 GHz to 95 GHz: (a) real part and (b) imaginary part.
magnitude and (b) phase.
TABLE I
MEASURED PERMITTIVITY AT 77, 80, 85, 91, 92, 93, AND 94 GHZ
from the magnitude information (broken line). Computer sim-
ulations showed that the disagreement between these two
methods is due to systematic errors in the magnitude of
the transmission coefficient: Assuming a complex permittivity
of we predicted amplitude and phase
of the transmission coefficient for various frequencies and
various angles of incidence. Subsequently we increased all
values of the amplitude by 0.005, i.e., we simulated a small
systematic error of the amplitude measurement. From this set
of amplitude and phase values we calculated the complex
permittivity and obtained curves similar to Fig. 4. Within a
small frequency range significant deviations from the correct and 0.3% for the real part and imaginary part of the complex
value of the permittivity are observed (see peaks in Fig. 4), permittivity, respectively. The sample thickness normalized to
if the permittivity is calculated only from the magnitude. the wavelength in the dielectric is about . In the 75
If we use both magnitude and phase, much more accurate GHz to 80 GHz range the standard error is less than 0.2
permittivity values are obtained. and 2.3% for the real part and imaginary part of the complex
The nonlinear least-squares estimate gives the mean value permittivity, respectively. The sample thickness normalized to
of the complex permittivity for all angles of incidence. In the wavelength in the dielectric is about . Table I gives
order to obtain an uncertainty we calculate the complex the measured complex permittivity at different frequencies.
permittivity values from the measurement for each single angle Now, the residuals between the measured transmission co-
of incidence. From this set of complex permittivity values efficient and the calculated transmission coefficient according
the standard error of estimate is determined. The accuracy to (6) are considered. The average residuals are less than 0.001
of the proposed method depends on the sample thickness. In in the magnitude and 0.250 in the phase over the whole
the 90 GHz to 94 GHz range the standard error is less 0.06 frequency range. The maximum residuals are 0.003 in the

Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on December 8, 2008 at 23:05 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
518 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, VOL. 46, NO. 2, APRIL 1997

magnitude and 0.6 in the phase. The measured transmission [5] D. H. Martin and J. W. Bowen, “Long-wave optics,” Trans. Microwave
coefficient is consistent with the theoretical model over the Theory Tech., vol. MTT-41, pp. 1676–1696, Oct. 1993.
[6] E. Hecht, Optik. Bonn/München, Germany: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
whole frequency range.

V. CONCLUSION
Gerhard L. Friedsam was born in Freyung,
By using the proposed method the complex permittivity was Germany, in 1968. He received the Dipl.-Phys.
measured with high accuracy in the millimeter wave range. degree in 1994 from the Technical University,
The sample preparation is very easy and nondestructive. The Munich, Germany. He is currently pursuing the
Dr.-Ing. degree.
consistency of the measurement data is tested by varying He is with the Lehrstuhl für Hochfrequenztech-
the error function and by comparison of the residuals. For nik, Technical University, Munich. His research
a glass sample with a thickness of an uncertainty less interests include field-theoretical analysis of planar
antennas and quasioptical measurement techniques.
than 0.06 and 0.3% for the real part and imaginary part Mr. Friedsam has been awarded a Graduate
of the complex permittivity has been achieved, respectively. Scholarship of the Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung e.V.,
By use of an optimized set-up, time gating and calibration Germany, for the academic years 1994–1996. He was co-recipient of the ITG
award in 1996. He is a member of the Informationstechnische Gesellschaft
techniques we minimized the systematic uncertainties to a (ITG) in the Verband Deutscher Elektrotechniker (VDE).
great extent. Thus, we estimate that the total uncertainty of
our measurement technique is less than 0.25 and 4% for
the real part and imaginary part of the complex permittivity,
respectively, in the whole frequency range from 75 GHz to Erwin M. Biebl (S’88–M’91–SM’96) was born in
Munich, Germany, in 1959. He received the Dipl.-
95 GHz. Ing., Dr.-Ing., and habilitation degrees in 1986,
1990, and 1993, respectively, all from the Technical
REFERENCES University, Munich, Germany.
In 1986, he joined Rohde & Schwarz, Munich,
[1] P. K. Kadaba, “Simultaneous measurement of complex permittivity and where he was involved in the development of mo-
permeability in the millimeter region by a frequency-domain technique,” bile radio communication test sets. Since 1988, he
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. IM-33, pp. 336–340, Dec. 1984. has been with the Institut für Hochfrequenztechnik,
[2] F. I. Shimabukuro, S. Lazar, M. R. Chernick, and H .B. Dyson, Technical University, Munich, where he is now
“A quasioptical method for measuring the complex permittivity of University Lecturer and Head of the millimeterwave
materials,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-32, pp. devices group. He has been engaged in research on optical communications
659–665, July 1984. and integrated optics. His current interests include field-theoretical analysis
[3] R. G. Nitsche and E. M. Biebl, “A free-space technique for measuring of planar resonators and antennas, quasioptical measurement techniques, and
the complex permittivity and permeability in the millimeter wave range,” design and characterization of integrated millimeterwave devices.
in 1994 IEEE MTT-S Microwave Symp. Dig., pp. 1465–1468. Dr. Biebl was the recipient of the Dr. Georg Spinner award in 1991. In
[4] P. F. Goldsmith, “Quasioptical techniques at millimeter and submil- 1996, he was co-recipient of the ITG award. He is a member of the Informa-
limeter wavelengths,” in Infrared and Millimeter Waves. New York: tionstechnische Gesellschaft (ITG) in the Verband Deutscher Elektrotechniker
Academic, 1982, vol. 6, pp. 277–343. (VDE), Germany.

Authorized licensed use limited to: IEEE Xplore. Downloaded on December 8, 2008 at 23:05 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

Вам также может понравиться