You are on page 1of 8

Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 1 of 8

In recent years, CorrView International has performed numerous ultrasonic


investigations of either very old pipe installed in the early 1900's, or at properties where a
combination of old and new pipe exist. We have found our test results a remarkable
demonstration of how environmental concerns and government restrictions, combined with
less tolerant engineering practices and cost cutting, have greatly reduced the life expectancy
of most new piping installations.

First and foremost is the obvious superiority in quality and corrosion resistance of much
older pre World War II pipe to that manufactured today - whether foreign or domestic. Our
ultrasonic testing of steam systems from 1911 have shown a minimal loss of only perhaps
20% from the original wall thickness. Testing of some galvanized steel domestic water risers
from 1920 have documented little if any wall loss and no loss of the zinc coating.

We have certified 80 year old steam condensate pipe, which traditionally suffers from the
acidic conditions of condensate requiring frequent replacement, as useful for another 50
years of service. CVI has documented condenser water systems from the early 1940's to
corrode at well below 1 mil per year (MPY) and offer hundreds of years of future service -
even at building locations where chemical treatment was poor or non-existent.

In contrast, we find few new properties able to control corrosion to below 5 MPY today
without expending extraordinary cost, supplemental filtration, close monitoring, and greater
maintenance effort. Chemical treatment programs costing $10,000 only 15 years ago now
reach almost 10 times that expense. Fully automatic chemical feed and bleed systems are no

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 2 of 8

longer a convenience, but mandatory.

Yet, most piping evaluations performed at newer building or plant installations using
ultrasonic and metallurgical testing typically reveal corrosion rates in the 3 to 5 MPY range
- with some examples exceeding 15 to 20 MPY. Such high rates often exist even in cases
where the chemical water treatment has been extremely well maintained. See Technical
Bulletin C-2 for recommendations on maintaining good corrosion control.

We have either directly seen or have been advised of condenser water or process piping
systems which have been entirely replaced after only 10 years in service or less. We have also
found large diameter 8 in. and 12 in. main risers repaired throughout some facilities using
emergency pipe clamps.

The use of more expensive copper in smaller diameter distribution HVAC piping and
process loops has become almost standard practice today in the effort to avoid the damaging
effects of corrosion against carbon steel. Larger diameter 8 in. and 12 in. condenser water
piping systems running the entire height of large commercial office buildings have been
entirely replaced using extra heavy copper and even 304 or 314 stainless steel - such
extraordinary expense applied solely in the effort to avoid the destructive effects of corrosion
rarely seen decades earlier.

Wrought iron ASTM A 72 pipe, which is well recognized and documented to provide
extremely long service life due to its internal grain structure and inherently high corrosion
resistance, can be found at many older pre-1970 properties. However, it was removed from
U.S. production in 1968 and is no longer available.

In examples where we have investigated building properties having both new carbon steel
and older wrought iron pipe, we have consistently provided remaining service life estimates
in the hundreds of years for the wrought iron, as opposed to a few decades or less for the
newly installed carbon steel. In many examples, we have found unpainted and un-insulated
wrought iron pipe surviving 50 or more years of outdoor weathering with only a fine layer of
surface rust and the original ASTM markings still intact.

While foreign produced pipe from Japan, Korea, Mexico, South America, and Eastern
Europe has traditionally shown the greatest susceptibility to corrosion, we have not found
recently produced American carbon steel pipe products of significantly higher quality in
terms of corrosion resistance.

Aside from the obvious net effects of stringent U.S. environmental controls and

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 3 of 8

government over-regulation, and the competition of low cost foreign steel, we have not been
able to establish suitable explanation for the obvious difference in new vs. old American pipe
products. Other changing factors acting against steel pipe produced today obviously exist.

For those many reasons, CVI strongly recommends that higher corrosion rates should be
anticipated regardless of any corrosion control measures planned or implemented. It should
be noted that standardized corrosivity tests, laboratory methods capable of measuring the
susceptibility of a metal to a typical corrosive environment and rating that metal according
to an established numerical standard, are available, and offer an excellent prediction or
warning of potential corrosion problems.

As mentioned, in response to such observed increases in corrosion, many property


managers, operating engineers, and plant managers have turned to the use of Type L copper
tubing (commonly called pipe) for all smaller diameter run-out distribution lines, and in
some cases even for the main risers. This, however, may only be a short term solution to an
often more complex corrosion condition, and in some cases may actually complicate an
existing corrosion problem with additional and unseen threats.

Important to consider in the substitution of copper pipe for carbon steel is the significant
difference in initial wall thickness. Standard Type L B 88 copper for 3 in. diameter pipe has
a standard wall thickness of only 0.090 in., whereas 3 in. A 53 schedule 40 carbon steel has a
wall thickness of 0.216 in. Compared to steel pipe having a stress efficiency (a strength
rating, not pressure rating) of 15,000 lb./sq. in., B 88 copper pipe only offers 6,000 lb./sq. in. -
a physical decrease in strength of 60%. Copper pipe has less than half the tensile strength of
steel, and quickly loses that strength at high temperatures.

It is generally recognized that the minimum acceptable wall thickness for copper tubing,
under any conditions, is approximately 0.040 in. At higher pressures, this minimum value
increases - thereby allowing for less physical wall loss to occur before being judged as
unsuitable for further reliable service.

Copper pipe, since it exhibits far less physical strength than steel, will fail sooner than
steel at the same wall thickness dimension and under the same internal pressure - making it
obvious that the greatest threat for any copper piping or components installed in a high rise
property exists at the higher operating pressures of the lower floors. The joint filler and
quality of workmanship is extremely critical for copper installed pipe, and has been
documented as the starting point of many failures.

While the corrosion rate against copper is commonly believed to exist below 0.5 MPY
under all conditions, CVI has repeatedly documented that the same corrosive environment
responsible for raising corrosion rates against carbon steel past 10 MPY, will greatly
increase the copper corrosion rate above its normal value as well.

In many of our previous ultrasonic examinations of condenser water systems which have

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 4 of 8

shown a high corrosion rate against carbon steel, we have also measured elevated corrosion
attack against the copper pipe. In fact, it is not uncommon to identify condenser water
systems having both a high steel corrosion rate of 15 MPY and a corrosion rate against
copper at 5 MPY or more.

Having a 5 MPY copper corrosion rate aggressively working against piping which may
only have an available 30 mils to 40 mils (0.030 in. to 0.040 in.) of wall thickness over
minimum acceptable standards translates to a system which will reach those minimum
standards in only a few years. Copper therefore should not be relied upon or viewed as any
form of safe or corrosion immune alternative given conditions where a high carbon steel
corrosion rate has already been documented, or where a high copper corrosion rate is
suspected.

For older pre-1970's building properties or plant operations, it is unlikely to find


anything but schedule 80 or extra heavy black pipe in use for cooling water, steam, or steam
condensate service. However, today, schedule 40 is the standard. Contrasted to a 0.322 in.
wall thickness for an 8 in. section of schedule 40 pipe, schedule 80 provides a significantly
greater 0.500 in. of available steel; for larger diameter standard grade pipe of 0.375 in. wall
thickness, extra heavy again offers 0.500 in. thickness. See Technical Bulletin P-5 for the pipe
sizes and schedules of different piping materials.

With internal operating pressures rarely a deciding factor on pipe selection within the
commercial building and process cooling market, the previous use of heavier materials, we
believe, has been more intended to counteract the known effects of corrosion activity and
thereby provide longer service life.

It is important to realize that decades ago, design engineers for piping systems assumed a
reasonable and readily achieved 1 MPY corrosion rate over an intended life expectancy of
about 65 years for the typical building property. Therefore, a theoretical 65 mil corrosion
rate or "corrosion factor" was typically applied in piping calculations for open condenser
water or process cooling applications. (A 25 MPY "corrosion factor" was applied to closed
systems such as for chill and how water heating.)

In other words, consulting and mechanical engineers estimated a total loss of only 65 mils
of pipe over the assumed lifetime of a typical condenser water or open process water system.
Any additional pipe wall thickness exceeding the corrosion factor and that needed to contain
the internal pressure and stresses was simply extra insurance against corrosion and future
operating problems.

Today, it is not unusual to measure the same loss of 65 mils after only 5 to 10 years of
service, and sometimes in as little as 2 years. But while corrosion activity has obviously
increased, the response to the greater loss of pipe has not been factored into the design and
planning of modern piping systems - leaving very little if any tolerance for a system wide
corrosion rate exceeding a few mils per year.

CorrView International has identified many building properties constructed in the 1970's
and earlier as benefitting by such engineering decisions. In the many decades since their

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 5 of 8

construction, we have documented the heavier schedule 80 pipe to have worn down to
approximately schedule 40 today. Some older properties, due to the original use of better
quality schedule 80 steel, actually have heavier and longer lasting pipe than their newly
constructed neighbors. It is an amazing paradox that CVI has well documented throughout
many years of ultrasonic testing.

This change in engineering design toward using thinner schedule 40 pipe, and sometimes
schedule 20 and schedule 10, is far more obvious and threatening for smaller diameter
threaded applications - where the additional loss of metal during the threading process often
reduces the life expectancy of open condenser water or process water piping to a decade or
less. See Technical Bulletin # P-1 about the effect of wall loss in threaded applications.

Threading typically reduces the available wall thickness by over 50% - leaving a 0.154 in.
thick piece of 2 in. schedule 40 pipe, less its thread cut of 0.087 in., with a true available and
working wall thickness of only 0.067 in. beginning at day one.

For piping systems having a typical 5 MPY corrosion rate, total penetration of the
threads will occur within 13 years of installation. In reality, failure usually occurs years
earlier. In fact, the use of schedule 40 or standard grade pipe in threaded open water
condenser applications does not even meet minimum acceptable engineering guidelines for
piping systems, and will typically provide only 10-15 years of service life under good
corrosion conditions. The failure of a threaded schedule 40 piping system in under 5 years is
not unusual, based upon our experience.

A growing concern is the recent increase in the use of Victaulic or clamped constructed
schedule 10 pipe in fire sprinkler service and even for condenser or open water systems.
While providing adequate wall thickness initially, schedule 10 pipe has approximately half of
the thickness of schedule 40, leaving virtually no tolerance for corrosion to occur.

Where the pipe is filled and left stagnant over extended time, a small amount of corrosion
takes place, oxygen is depleted, and the corrosion process virtually stops. However, where
the system is frequently drained, or where service extensions, leaks, or repairs bring in fresh
water, corrosion rates can reach the level of open water systems, and premature failure is
inevitable. Combined with the use of thin wall schedule 10 pipe, a fire sprinkler system
having any influx of fresh water is almost guaranteed to experience premature failure.

For a section of 8 in. condenser water pipe that would have provided an extra heavy wall
thickness of 0.500 in. for a 1950's property, or 0.322 in. at a facility constructed of schedule
40 in 1985, the frequently seen use of schedule 10 now provides only 0.188 in. of available
wall thickness under substantially higher corrosion conditions.

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 6 of 8

Schedule 80 - 0.500 in. Schedule 40 - 0.322 in. Schedule 10 - 0.188 in.

Advanced failures are therefore quite frequent where schedule 10 is employed, and easy
to understand in viewing the above relative illustration of different pipe wall thickness
schedules for 8 in. pipe.

CVI overwhelmingly recommends using heavier schedule 80 steel pipe in all small
diameter applications calling for threaded joints. We also recommend using no thinner than
schedule 40 pipe for fire sprinkler or condenser water systems - whether using threaded,
welded, or Victaulic or grooved clamped construction.

For decades, building and plant engineers relied solely upon the use of chromate based
chemical additives to provide the required corrosion protection of steel piping systems. With
even the most inferior application methods, often nothing more than an unmeasured scoop
of chromate powder dumped into the cooling tower sump at irregular intervals, corrosion
rates could often be maintained at or below 1 MPY.

Biological fouling was a rarely encountered problem due to chromate's inherent toxicity.
Such trouble free operation ended, however, in the mid-1980's - with the prohibition of all
chromate use in open water circulating systems in the United States.

Today, molybdate, phosphate, and other U.S. EPA approved chemical inhibitors rarely
equal the effectiveness of past chromate treatments. Though offering impressive corrosion
suppression in bench test or laboratory settings, non-chromate programs rarely provide
similar results under real world conditions. They are documented as being substantially
ineffective in stagnant, low flow, or dead ended piping areas. During many years of
ultrasonic pipe testing, CVI has identified numerous examples where the highest corrosion
rates have been found exclusively at those areas having the lowest flows.

Non-chromate treatments offer no microbiological or fungal control - thereby placing


increased emphasis on the use of alternating biocide chemicals. Unfortunately, biocides
themselves have had their effective half-life reduced to about 6 hours by U.S. federal and
state environmental authorities. The result - a legal limit of the amount of biocide one can
apply over a given period of time, as well as a legal limitation over its strength, effectiveness,
and the time it will remain active.

And yet, microbiological activity has been identified as playing an much greater role in
metal corrosion then previously thought - MIC being the most serious piping threat known.
See Technical Bulletin # C-5 for more about the threat of MIC.

The alternative, oxidizing biocides such as chlorine, bromine and ozone, all offer excellent
microbiological control at the trade off of increased corrosion and pitting. The common
overuse of oxidizing agents such as chlorine and bromine on a weekly or daily basis have
been known to produce severe pitting of steel and copper pipe, and to quickly remove the

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 7 of 8

galvanizing coating from cooling tower pan surfaces.

Together, the combination of all the above named factors has placed a higher priority on
corrosion control which did not exist 20 years ago, and which has raised the issue of
chemical treatment, and the monitoring over its effectiveness, to new levels of importance
within those involved in building and plant engineering, maintenance, and operations.

Virtually all advanced piping failures we have seen have been traced back to an
ineffective or lacking water treatment program at some point in the building's history - most
notably due to poor initial cleanout and start-up procedures. Quite clearly, the first six
months of operation are critical for any building or plant facility.

To the inherent limitations of the chemicals must be added the experience and reputation
of the water treatment professional. A lack of knowledge, experience, and professionalism,
or a primary interest for profits, can be equally as damaging to a piping system as a lack of
chemical protection entirely.

A less reputable water treatment company may be discovered and replaced, but the
effects of even six months of sub-standard service can initiate a lifetime of corrosion troubles
for a building or plant operation. A further limitation may also be the budget constraints of
the property or plant itself, or the need to meet a contract limit established by a previous
water treatment vendor.

Ultimately, some building property owner or plant operator is faced with with not only
the difficult task of correcting or replacing a piping system, but perhaps the responsibility
for the actions or inactions of those years prior as well. Constant attention, and a thorough
and accurate corrosion monitoring program is therefore they key to trouble free operation.

Review our disclaimer on any technical information contained within this article.

© Copyright

CorrView is the first "pipe fuse" for HVAC systems. Produces a brilliant color change
indicating that a predetermined amount of pipe wall thickness has been lost due to internal

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004
Changes In Pipe Trends Which Have Occurred Over Past Decades Page 8 of 8

corrosion.

CorrView is a new product designed in response to corrosion problems


recognized in over 22 years of chemical water treatment and ultrasonic pipe
testing experience.

This simple, self-contained, low cost, and maintenance free corrosion


testing device provides every property owner / plant operator an easy and
effective means to realistically measure corrosion activity. Ideally suited for
monitoring condenser water and other HVAC or process piping.

We hope the above Technical Bulletin has been interesting and helpful.
Please feel free to contact CorrView International, LLC at any time to discuss
any particular corrosion, piping, or rust problem or concern.

z Operates Under Actual System Conditions


z Installed Directly Into The Piping System
z More Accurate Than Corrosion Coupons
z Extends Monitoring Coverage
z Provides Added Safety
z Measures All Forms Of Corrosion Effect
z Low Cost, Easy Installation Extends Use
z Provides Independant Testing

file://E:\CorrView%20International\Documents%20Download%20Files\Created%20PDF... 3/26/2004