Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2. What are the different modes of falsification under Article 171 of the RPC?
- Counterfeiting or imitating any handwriting, signature or rubric
- Causing it to appear that persons have participated in an act or proceeding
- Attributing to persons who have participated in any act or proceeding
statements other than those in fact made by them
- Making untruthful statements in a narration of facts
- Altering true dates
- Making any altercation or intercalation in a genuine document which changes
its meaning
- Issuing an authenticated form of a document purporting to be a copy of an
original document when no such original exists, or including in such copy a
statement contrary to or different from that genuine of the original
- Intercalating any instrument or note relative to the issuance thereof in a
protocol, registry or official book
ARTICLES TO INCLUDE
Mutiny is the unlawful resistance to a superior officer, or the raising of commotions and
disturbances aboard a ship against the authority of its commander.
Elements of Mutiny:
1. The vessel is on the high seas or Philippine waters;
2. Offenders are either members of its complement, or passengers of the vessel;
3. Offenders either –
a) attack or seize the vessel; or
b) seize the whole or part of the cargo, its equipment, or personal belongings
of the crew or passengers.
ELEMENTS:
TYPES:
a. Discharging any firearm, rocket, firecracker, or other explosive within any town or
public place, calculated to cause alarm or danger
b. Instigating or taking active part in any charivari or other disorderly meeting offensive
to another or prejudicial to public tranquility
c. Disturbing the public peace while wandering about at night or while engaged in any
other nocturnal amusement
d. Causing any disturbance or scandal in public places while intoxicated or otherwise,
provided the act is not covered by Art 153 (tumult).
ELEMENTS :
Elements:
Requisites:
Requisites:
Requisites:
Requisites:
The acts of falsification mentioned in this paragraph are committed by a public officer or
by a notary public who takes advantage of his official position as custodian of the
document. It can also refer to a public officer or notary who prepared and retained a copy
of the document. The falsification can be done in two ways. It can be a certification
purporting to show that the document issued is a copy of the original on record when no
such original exists. It can also be in the form of a certification to the effect that the
document on file contains statements or including in the copy issued, entries which are
not found on contrary to, or different from the original genuine document on file.
ELEMENTS
a. That the offender is a private individual or a public officer or employee who did
b. not take advantage of his official position.That he committed any of the acts of
falsification enumerated in ART. 171.
1. Counterfeiting or imitating any handwriting, signature or rubric.
2. Causing it to appear that persons have participated in any act or
proceeding when they did not in fact so participated.
3. Attributing to persons who have participated in an act or proceeding
statements other than those in fact made by them.
4. Making untruthful statements in a narration of facts; Altering true dates.
5. Making any alteration or intercalation in a genuine document which
changes its meaning.
ELEMENTS :
a. That the offender committed any of the acts of falsification, except those in
paragraph 7 and 8, enumerated in art. 171.
b. That the falsification was committed in any private document (must affect the
truth or integrity of the document)
c. That the falsification caused damage (essential element; hence, no crime of estafa
thru falsification of private document) to a third party or at least the falsification
was committed with intent to cause such damage.
ELEMENTS:
1. That the offender knew that a document was falsified by another person.
2. That the false document is embraced in art. 171 or in any subdivisions nos. 1 and 2
of art. 172.
3. That he introduced said document in evidence in any judicial proceeding. (intent to
cause damage not necessary)
1. That the offender knew that a document was falsified by another person.
2. That the false document is embraced in art. 171 or in any of subdivisions nos. 1
and 2 of art. 172.
3. That he used such documents (not in judicial proceedings).
4. That the use of the documents caused damage to another or at least was used with
intent to cause such damage.
ELEMENTS:
a. Offender performs an act
b. Act is highly scandalous as offending against decency or good customs
c. Highly scandalous conduct does not expressly fall within any other article of the
RPC
d. Committed in a public place or within the public knowledge or view. (The public
view is not required, it is sufficient if in public place. For public knowledge, it
may occur even in a private place; the number of people who sees it is not
material).
Grave scandal: consists of acts which are offensive to decency and good customs. They
are committed publicly and thus, give rise to public scandal to persons who have
accidentally witnessed the acts
Malfeasance – Doing of an act which a public officer should not have done
Bribery is direct when a public officer is called upon to perform or refrain from
performing an official act in exchange for the gift, present or consideration given to him.
If he simply accepts a gift or present given to him by reason of his public position, the
crime is indirect bribery. Bear in mind that the gift is given "by reason of his office", not
"in consideration" thereof. So never use the term “consideration.” The public officer in
Indirect bribery is not to perform any official act.
Note however that what may begin as an indirect bribery may actually ripen into direct
bribery.
Illustration:
Without any understanding with the public officer, a taxi operator gave an expensive
suiting material to a BLT registrar. Upon receipt by the BLT registrar of his valuable
suiting material, he asked who the giver was. He found out that he is a taxi operator. As
far as the giver is concerned, he is giving this by reason of the office or position of the
public officer involved. It is just indirect bribery
If the BLT registrar calls up his subordinates and said to take care of the taxis of the taxi
operator so much so that the registration of the taxis is facilitated ahead of the others,
what originally would have been indirect bribery becomes direct bribery.
ELEMENTS:
a. That the offender be a public officer within the scope of Art 203
b. That the offender accepts an offer or promise or receives a gift or present by
himself or through another
c. That such offer or promise be accepted or gift/present received by the public
officer (mere agreement consummates the crime)
1. with a view to committing some crime (delivery of consideration is not
necessary) or
2. in consideration of an execution of an act which does not constitute a
crime, but the act must be unjust (delivery of consideration is necessary),
or
3. to refrain from doing something which is his official duty to do
d. That the act which the offender agrees to perform or which he executes be
connected with the performance of his official duties
ELEMENTS:
ELEMENTS:
a. That the offender makes offers or promises or gives gifts or present to a public officer.
b. That the offers or promises are made or the gifts or presents given to a public officer,
under circumstances that will make the public officer liable for direct bribery or
indirect bribery
a. That the offender be a public officer (or private person if entrusted with public funds
or connived with public officers)
b. That he had the custody or control of funds or property (if not accountable for the
funds, theft or qualified theft)
c. That those funds or property were public funds or property (even if private funds if
attached, seized, deposited or commingled with public funds)
d. That he:
1. Appropriated the funds or property
2. Took or misappropriated them
3. Consented or, through abandonment or negligence, permitted any other person to
take such public funds or property. (it is not necessary that the offender profited
thereby. His being remiss in the duty of safekeeping public funds violates the
trust reposed)
Concept of Malversation
ELEMENTS:
ELEMENTS:
Requisites:
1. A legally married person or parent surprises his spouse or daughter (the latter must be
under 18 and living with them) in the act of committing sexual intercourse with
another person
2. He/she kills any or both of them or inflicts upon any or both of them any serious
physical injury in the act or immediately thereafter
3. He has not promoted or facilitated the prostitution of his wife or daughter, or that he
has not consented to the infidelity of the other spouse.
Article 248 - MURDER
ELEMENTS:
a. with treachery, taking advantage of superior strength, with the aid or armed
men, or employing means to weaken the defense or of means or persons to
insure or afford impunity
ELEMENTS:
1. That a person was killed.
2. That the accused killed him without any justifying circumstances.
3. That the accused had the intention to kill, which is presumed.
4. That the killing was not attended by any of the qualifying circumstances of murder, or
by that of parricide or infanticide.
How Committed
1. Wounding
2. Beating
3. Assaulting
4. Administering injurious substances
3. Injured person –
a. becomes deformed
b. loses any other member of his body
c. loses the use thereof
ELEMENTS:
1. That the offended party is incapacitated for labor for 10 days or more (but not more
than 30 days), or needs medical attendance for the same period of time
2. That the physical injuries must not be those described in the preceding articles
3 Kinds:
a. That which incapacitated the offended party for labor from 1-9 days or required
medical attendance during the same period
b. That which did not prevent the offended party from engaging in his habitual work or
which did not require medical attendance (ex. Black-eye)
c. Ill-treatment of another by deed without causing any injury (ex. slapping but without
causing dishonor)
Review *rape*