Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Until the 1970s, there was a widely accepted view of best practice in manufacturing.
Firms which had grown on the back of post-war reconstruction, sold into stable and
relatively undemanding markets. Supply-shortages meant that as long as firms could
provide the volume at a reasonable price and quality, they would continue to thrive.
Given these stable and favourable market conditions, the "model" which firms generally
strived to achieve was based on the following main characteristics:
Logistics were organised around the principle of mass production. Low cost was
to be achieved through high volume. Machinery was thus designed to produce
specialised products, and machine changeovers were to be minimised. This led
firms to hold large inventories of incoming materials, work-in-progress and
finished products, just-in-case anything might go wrong and interrupt the flow of
production.
These principles of mass production were appropriate as long as markets were stable and
undemanding. But once final markets became more heterogeneous and changeable, new
principles of production had to be established. In Europe, North America and Japan, these
market conditions began to change in the 1970s - customers wanted increasing variety
and quality, and were unwilling to trade-off quality against price. This led producers in
these countries to adopt new organising principles for their production processes.
Producers in India and other developing countries were until recently insulated from
more demanding markets and continued with outdated forms of manufacturing
organisation. But now, with trade liberalisation, this head-in-the-sand attitude is no longer
viable.
Work organisation becomes much more flexible, and the boundaries between “skilled”
and “unskilled” workers are narrowed. A key task is to develop an organisation, which
focuses on learning and continuous improvement, involving all of the labour force rather
than just the “skilled” engineers and managers.
There are a large number of "tools" which can be used to realise these objectives with
regard to production control, inventory and work-organisation. Some of these are to do
with factory layout; others affect production scheduling, machine changeover, quality
assurance and work-organisation. There is no universal toolkit that all firms need to adopt
in all circumstances. Which tool is relevant depends upon the particular Critical Success
Factors in the market in which the firm is operating. In making the transition to World-
Class Manufacturing, the firm needs to address three primary challenges, namely to:
reliability of suppliers
4. Internal flexibility Cellular layouts, single unit • Machine changeover
flow, production pulling, times
kanban signalling system, • Batch and lot sizes
single-minute exchange of • Inventory levels
dies for rapid machine • Throughput time
changeover, supply chain through factory
management • Machine utilisation
levels
5. Capacity to change Multi-tasking, multi-skilling, • Literacy levels
(Human resource quality circles, kaizen groups, • Labour/management
development) training, incentive schemes. turnover levels
• Absenteeism rates
• Training expenditure
and types of training
• Employee development
• Suggestion
schemes/continuous
improvement
6. Innovation capacity Concurrent engineering, new • R&D expenditure
product development techniques • Proportion of sales from
new products
World Class Manufacturing and Organisational Restructuring
World Class Manufacturers are those that demonstrate industry best practice. To achieve
this companies should attempt to be best in the field at each of the competitive priorities
(quality, price, delivery speed, delivery reliability, flexibility and innovation).
Organisations should therefore aim to maximise performance in these areas in order to
maximise competitiveness. However, as resources are unlikely to allow improvement in
all areas, organisations should concentrate on maintaining performance in 'qualifying'
factors and improving 'competitive edge' factors. The priorities will change over time and
must therefore be reviewed.
example, it is quality, then emphasis will have to be given to the use of those
organisational tools, which will best deliver high quality at a low cost. Similarly, if lead-
time to satisfying customer orders is critical, then the emphasis will be placed on altering
production-flow, and reducing batch sizes and inventories.
Many of these changes will diffuse naturally as a consequence of the operation of the
market. Firms will be forced to innovate or to die. Diffusion may also happen as a
consequence of the demands of the lead-firms who are forcing change on their suppliers.
But international experience suggests that it would be unwise to rely on these two
mechanisms alone.
The natural operation of market forces may have forced into bankruptcy some firms
which might have survived had they been able to make the necessary changes first. And
lead-firms may make demands of their suppliers, but the suppliers may not know how to
achieve these demands. They will thus be delisted and be unable to thrive. A helping
hand can come form the Government of the country which can adopt suitable measures
that help to promote the diffusion of World Class Manufacturing.
Bibliography