Paper Code:

1. The research novelty: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented
in the paper.
a. A pioneering piece of work. Striking novel ideas or results.
b. Significant original work and novel results.
c. Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated.
d. Minor variations on a well investigated subject.
e. It has been said many times before.

2. Research methods: Research methods appropriateness and evidence adequacy (the

relation between method and problem).
a. Research method is easily identified and is appropriate to address the problem.
b. Research method is not easily identified, but only partially appropriate to
address the problem.
c. Research method is not clearly identified, but inappropriateness is not evident.
d. Research method does not answer the problem.
e. Research method cannot be identified.

3. Future Impact: Future impact on related subject of the research/society.

a. Future impact is clearly defined, and is relevant to varied research/ society.
b. Future impact is defined but not very clear; the likely impact is relevant to
some research/ society.
c. Future impact is not explicitly defined; the likely impact is limited.
d. Future impact is not defined; the likely impact is questionable.
e. Future impact cannot defined.

4. The Clarity of Research Question: The clarity of research question/ problem and
relevance of the literature overview.
a. Problem is easily identified in the introductory section, and clearly related to
literature review.
b. Problem can be identified, and related to literature review.
c. Problem is incompletely reported, and the relevance to literature review is not
clear.
d. Problem is incomprehensible, and literature review is vague.
e. Problem is not reported, and literature is poorly reviewed.

5. Scientific argument and discussion: - The strength of argument and discussion in

connecting research finding with original research question. – The summary and
discussions (indicating to what degree the problem has been solved).
a. Excellent discussion with good amount of evidence to support conclusion.
b. Good discussion with adequate evidence to support conclusion.
c. Standard arguments that only partially support the conclusion.
d. Conclusions are not supported by decent discussion.
e. Conclusions and/or discussions are absent.
6. Generally, is that the paper worth to be published?
a. Yes
b. No

7. Detailed Comment: If answer No. 6 is “Yes”, please justify your recommendation and
suggest improvements in :
a. Technical content
1. Makalah membahas tetang aplikasi atau implementasi odel Hadley-Within untuk
menyelesaikan masalah inventory di PT. XYZ, namun demikian perlu dijelaskan
secara lebih spesifik dari sekian banyak model, mengapa continuous review dan
Hadley-Within yang digunakan, sebaiknya salah satu model saja yang digunakan
dalam makalah ini.
2. Perlu penjelasan hubungan antara Continuous Review model dengan Model Hadley
Within dalam makalah ini karena keduanya dapat digunakan untuk menyelesaikan
masalah yang sama, dimana penyelesaian continuous review secara analitik
sedangkan Hadley Within Heuristik.
b. Presentation (ex: writing rules, format table, format picture, etc. )
Lihat detail komentar pada naskah.

8. Detailed Comment: If answer No. 6 is “No”, please justify your reason and suggest
improvements in technical content or presentation to the next paper.
a. Technical content
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

b. Presentation (ex: writing rules, format table, format picture, etc. )

_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

9. The overall score of paper ( Score Scale : 1 – 10 ) :7