Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The error is the difference between the result obtained and the generally accepted 'correct'
result found in the data book or other literature. If the 'correct' result is available it should be
recorded and the percentage error calculated and commented upon in your conclusion. Without
the 'correct ' value no useful comment on the error can be made.
1
That is referred to as the range and the acceptable values would then be 0.26 to
0.28 g.
Estimating Uncertainties
Estimating (random) uncertainties is somewhat different based on the type of measurement
tool you are using. For
o Analogue apparatus includes beakers, graduated cylinders, burets, alcohol
thermometers. The uncertainty for analogy measurements is taken to be ½ of the
smallest division. So a graduated cylinder whose smallest division is 1 mL will have an
uncertainty of ± 0.5 mL. The volume would be represented as 25.0 ± 0.5 mL. Notice how
both the volume recorded and the uncertainty have the same number of decimal
places!!! Very important!
o Digital Instruments include electronic balances and computer based technology that
determines values for you. The uncertainties are given below
o Humans bring limitation and thus uncertainty to every experiment they do. These fall
under the category of random errors. For example, if you were doing an experiment that
required you to measure the time taken for a reaction mixture to change color in order
to determine the rate of the reaction you would probably use a stopwatch. You would
have to see measure your reaction time and then decide on an acceptable uncertainty. A
suitable uncertainty for this type of experiment might be ± 0.5 sec or ± 1 sec.
2
accuracy is excellent as well as your precision. Let’s take a look at these two terms in more
detail.
As you continued your evening of winning at darts to all who challenged you, it became
apparent to your very analytical mind that four different patterns of darts board emerged after a
the darter (is that a word?) finished her or her round of ten. They are shown below. You can see
that both terms, precise and accurate are included.
1. 2.
Not precise
(reproducibility error)
3. 4.
Precision is defined in science as the reproducibility of results. Do you keep getting the
same value over and over again regardless of how you conduct your experiment? If so, then we
can say you have a high degree of precision. All of your measurements are very close together.
When this is the case, precision is high. Precision does not mean that your results are actually
“good” results. Precision only means that you are consistent for those particular results. Notice
that dartboards 1 and 2 show all of the darts bunched together in one location.
3
The table below shows temperatures taken for the 6 readings. The values are very close
together and the average is also close to each of the individual measurements. This collection of
data represents, once again, high precision.
Systematic errors
A systematic error, is an error which occurs at each
reading.
4
Sources of systematic errors include:
instrument (graduated cylinder or beaker) in consistently the same way. This will result in a
spread of results, even in the most carefully designed of experiments. Due to the random
nature of these errors, there is an equal chance that they will be above or below the ‘true’
value. To minimize such errors, it is good practice to take many readings and find the mean,
even in the simplest of experiments. Because it is impossible to know the ‘true’ value, the best
estimate is the mean of repeat readings.
Systematic Errors
Systematic errors arise in an experiment as a result of the apparatus used or the procedure
followed. Systematic errors result in a loss of accuracy. A systematic error cannot be diminished
by repeated trials. For example, you use an electronic balance to take the masses of the various
substances you are using in your experiment. It turns out the balance is not properly calibrated.
Your measurement of 23.25 grams is actually 24.25 g. No matter how many times you repeat
taking the mass of this object, it will be 1.00 g heavier than it should be.
Recall that we take the absolute value of the difference between the
experimental and literature values. Percent error is always given as a positive value.
%E>%U
If % error > % uncertainty,
For the above density example, the percent error would be:
systematic errors need to be
considered. |7.96 – 8.96| x 100 = |-1.00| = 1.00 x 100 = 11.1%
8.96 8.96 8.96
We can calculate a value called the percent uncertainty, which is due to random error.
You may need to compare the percent error and the percent uncertainty when you are
completing your research project at the beginning of your T4 year. If the percent error is greater
than the percent uncertainty, we can reasonably assume the experiment involves some
systematic errors. For any density experiment where water displacement is involved, one
primary systematic error is the unreliability of the graduated cylinder. Also, the pennies were
5
not completely copper metal and thus another error. Remember, systematic errors can be
reduced by changing the way in which the experiment is carried out in this case. You could
actually find the volume of the penny by using a ruler to measure the
height of the penny and the diameter and then use the volume of a % E< % U
cube equation to determine the volume. This would give a more If % error < % uncertainty, you
precise volume measurement that could be used with the mass of the have designed a very good
pennies to determine the density. procedure and your
experiment has worked well as
a way of obtaining a particular
When the percent error < percent uncertainty, then the experiment value.
has worked well as a way of obtaining a value for this particular
quantity.
The table below summarizes the relationship between percent error and percent uncertainty
and how one’s experiment may be impacted.
Percent error << percent random uncertainty Experiment has worked well as a way of
obtaining a value for a particular quantity when
compare to an accepted literature value.
Percent error < percent uncertainty Experiment should be further refined by using
more precise measuring apparatus and/or taking
additional measurements
Percent error > percent uncertainty Systemic errors exist and these must be
eliminated as far as is possible.
6
11.2 Significant figures
In order to do calculations using measurements you have collected, you first have to be able to
determine the number of significant figures in any measurement. In science, we talk about “the
number of significant figures” in a measurement and counting them correctly means your
calculated answers are also correct.
ii. For number less than one, zeros that appear between the decimal and
the first digit are not significant
Examples: 0.0025 g 1 SF
0.00160 cm 3 SF
the zeros between the decimal and number 1 are not significant, but the
zero at the end is! I know, tricky.)
0.0065 mm 2 SF
We say that all non-zero digits are significant. They count in terms of expressing the specificity
or precision of a measurement. For example, 12.5 mL has 3 sig figs and 25.55 mL has 4 sig figs.
7
This must mean that the measuring tool I am using in the first measurement above is not as
good a measurement device as the second measurement.
8
2. Multiply this deviation by 2/3. Thus we have 0.7 cm 3 (2/3) = 0.46 cm3. Our measurement are
all to the 1/10th place so we
round 0.46 to 0.5 cm3. Now we can write our mean value for volume with an uncertainty, 21.4
± 0.5 cm3 and be reasonable sure that the range of values will fall 20.9 21.9 cm3.
The above table is a review of how to handle significant figures when you begin calculating
values based on the measurements you obtain from a particular experiment. Adding and
subtracting are handled differently than multiplication/division. You should be able to see that
for add/subtract, the number of sig figs in your calculation is based on the decimal place of the
measurements. If all measurements end in the 1/100th place, but one ends in tne 1/10th place,
then your addition or subtraction must end in the 1/10th place. The add/subtract rules shows up
when you are determining the percent error of a measurement.
9
For example, the literature value for the heat released when 50 mL of 0.1 M NaOH reacts with
50 mL of 0.1 M HCl is -57.3 kJ/mol. The experimental value obtained was recorded as
-55.80 kJ/mol. Recall that percent error is:
The literature value is given to the 1/10th place but the experimental value is given to the
1/100th place. Thus the difference of these two values will be only to the 1/10 th place or 1.5
kJ/mol not 1.50 kJ/mol.
When we multiply or divide, our calculated answer is based on our least significant
measurement. To complete the percent error for the heat released, we take the difference
calculated and divide by our literature value. Thus,
When to Round?
|-57.3-(-55.80)| x 100 = 2.6% In general, when you have a
|-57.3| calculation that involves many
steps, wait until you arrive at your
final answer. Round that value to
1.5 has two sig figs and the literature value has three sig figs, the correct number of significant
therefore we report our answer with two sig figs. figures.
2. Round each measurement to the number of correct number of significant figures indicated in
parentheses.
10
d. 191,000 km (1 SF) ______200,000km______
e. 150.6142 g (3 SF) _______151g_____
f. 2.0097 x 10-12 pL (4 SF) _______2.001x10^-12pL_____
g. 0.0115 dg (2 SF) _____0.012dg_______
h. 89.69 mL (3 SF) _______89.7mL_____
3. Perform the following calculations and give your answer to the correct number of significant
figures.
a. 18.7644 g – 3.472 g + 0.4101 g = _____15.70g_______
b. 17.441 g/mL ÷ 3 = __5.8137mL_ (3 not a meas; finding average)
c. 14.044 mL + 8.11 mL + 3.4 mL = _____25mL_______
d. 3.41 g – 0.086652 g = ______3.32g______
e. 0.87 mm x 4.061 x 10.4 = _____37mm_______
f. 21.01 m x 2 m ______40m______
g. Calculate the average of the following set of density values (g/cm 3):
18.4, 18.45, 18.54 and 18.7 = _____18.5g/cm3____
11
Notice that both the measurement and its corresponding uncertainty (the uncertainty shown
on the back of the electronic balance) are in grams. The absolute uncertainty would be 0.01 g.
The percent uncertainty is exactly what it says: a percent of the actual mass you measure. For
our above mass, we would take the absolute uncertainty (0.01 g) and divide by our mass (21.75
g) and then multiplying by 100.
Example: Find the absolute uncertainty for the following measurement: 5.2 g ± 2%
Return the percent to a decimal and multiple by the quantity measured—in this case 5.18 g.
Mathematically we have,
Therefore, our measurement with absolute uncertainty would be recorded as 5.2 ± 0.1 g.
Notice that both the measurement value and the absolute uncertainty match in that they are
both carried to the 1/10th place.
12
c. 13.21 ± 0.01 m d. 0.002 ± 0.001 g
2. Convert the following to absolute uncertainties. Rewrite the measurement with that
uncertainty to the correct number of significant figures.
a. 3.5 cm ± 10 % b. 16 s ± 8 %
• Adding or subtracting
The mathematical operation is carried out and the uncertainties of the measurements are
added together. This is true for both adding and subracting. The following example is shown
below with a table of temperature data and the uncertainty for each temperature.
13
To get the change in temperature, ∆T, we subtract,
We deal with the uncertainty for each measurement by adding them together. Thus,
EXAMPLE: Calculate the moles of 3.45 ± 0.05 L of a 2.55 ± 0.01 M NaOH and write your final
answer with:
a. uncertainty (percent is assumed)
b. absolute uncertainty.
c. Correct number of significant figures.
a. Our moles can be written as (3.45 L • 2.55 mol/L) = 8.80 mol ± 0.59%
b. To calculate the absolute uncertainty, we take our percent uncertainty, divide it by 100
and then multiply by our moles. Recall, that we avoid rounding errors by rounding at the
final calculation. Thus we will multiply M • V = 3.45 L • 2.55 mol/L = 8.7975 moles and
keep all of the digits until the end.
14
We keep to the 1/100th place because our moles are to the 1/100th place.
Suppose we want to multiply the volume, 12.12 ± 0.05 mL by 3. We would represent that value
as
The uncertainty of one
12.12 mL •3 = 36.36 mL
measurement is very large
0.05 mL • 3 = 0.15 mL When the uncertainty of one measurement is
with the final value reported as 36.36 ± 0.15 mL so large relative to the uncertainties of the
other measurements, the uncertainty of the
If we need to divide a number (as in an average), we final calculation can be considered as arising
from this measurement with the large
divide the uncertainty as well.
uncertainty.
15
Answer Key
16
Self Test 11.2
1. a. 3 2. a. 3.74 mg
b. 2 b. 0.0041 g
c. 1 c. 82 mL
d. 2 d. 200,000 km
e. 4 e. 2.001 x 10-12 pL
f. 5 f. 0.012 dg
g. 2 g. 89.7 mL
h. 6
i. 4
j. 3
3. a. 14.882 g 4. a. 4.7 x 104 kg
b. 5.8137 g/mL b. 8 x 10 -4 M HCl
c. 25.6 g c. 6.75 x 108 m
d. 3.32 g d. 1.57 x 1023 pg
e. 3.407 x10-7 pL
e. 37 mm3 f. 0.0766 mg
f. 40 m2 g. 780,000 km
g. 18.5 g/cm3 h. 0.000475 cm3
i. 0.0006 g
j. 900,000,000 km
k. 602,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 mol Self Test
11.3b
1 a. 1.85%
b. 0.67%
c. 0.08%
d. 50%
e. 8.3%
f. 8%
2 a. 3.5 ± 0.4 cm
b. 16 ± 1 sec
c. 8.9 ± 0.1 g
d. 12.12 ± 0.01 cm
17