Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Indian J Pediatr

DOI 10.1007/s12098-014-1573-6

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Relationship Between Blood Pressure, Anthropometric


Indices and Metabolic Profile in Adolescents: A Cross
Sectional Study
Setila Dalili & Hamid Mohammadi & Seyed Mahmood Rezvany & Arsalan Dadashi &
Mohammad Hassan Novin & Hajar Gholaminejad & Abdolreza Medghalchi &
Zahra Mohtasham Amiri & Hossein Dalili & Afagh Hassanzadeh Rad

Received: 9 June 2013 / Accepted: 22 August 2014


# Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2014

Abstract blood sugar (FBS), blood sugar (BS), cholesterol, and triglyc-
Objective To investigate the relationship between blood pres- eride (TG), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipo-
sure, anthropometric indices and metabolic profile in protein (HDL) and insulin levels were measured. Data were
adolescents. analyzed in SPSS software, by descriptive and analytic statis-
Methods The present cross sectional study was conducted in tics and p value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
1005, 12-y-old junior students referred to 15 urban health Results Eight hundred fifty nine adolescents consisting of 550
centers of Rasht. Samples were recruited randomly and data (64 %) boys and 309 (34 %) girls participated in this study;
were collected in a form which consisted of demographic 11.4 % (84/739 cases) of the participants had hypertension.
characteristics, history of disease in samples and their imme- The strongest correlation was seen between systolic blood
diate families, birth weight, physical examination and clinical pressure and weight, waist or hip circumferences and insulin
examination including height, weight, blood pressure and levels. Also, FBS had very weak correlation with blood
body mass index. Also, metabolic profiles including fasting pressure.
Conclusions Thus, weight, waist and hip circumferences, in-
sulin levels, high TG and low HDL have been indicated as the
S. Dalili
strongest correlating factors for high blood pressure.Thus,
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Pediatric Growth Disorders
Research Center, 17 Shahrivar Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan these factors should be investigated in high risk children and
University of Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran followed in hypertensive child to monitor cardiometabolic
risk factors.
H. Mohammadi (*)
Department of Pediatrics, Shiraz University of Medical
Sciences-International Branch, Shiraz, Iran Keywords Blood pressure . Anthropometry . Lipoproteins .
e-mail: mohammadi219@gmail.com Adolescent
S. M. Rezvany : A. Dadashi : M. H. Novin : H. Gholaminejad :
A. Medghalchi
Department of Health Center, Guilan University of Medical
Sciences, Guilan, Iran
Introduction

Z. Mohtasham Amiri Hypertension (HTN) is a global health problem, and it is well-


Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Guilan University of documented that increased blood pressure (BP) becomes
Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran
established in childhood [1]. A growing evidence indicate that
H. Dalili not only HTN gradually damages the function of vital organs,
Department of Pediatrics, Breastfeeding Research Center, Tehran but also pre-HTN has the same harmful effects [2].
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Although, the prevalence of hypertension among adoles-
cents is approximately 3.5 % [3] approximately 54 % of stroke
A. Hassanzadeh Rad
Pediatrics Growth Disorders Research Center, School of Medicine, and 47 % of ischemic heart disease which occurs, worldwide
Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran are attributable to high blood pressure [4].
Indian J Pediatr

According to previous investigations, factors such as meth- and laboratory results’ cutoff point was determined based on
odological differences in measurement, socio demographic standard references [14].
factors, adiposity levels and ethnicity appear to influence the For anthropometric indices, weight were measured in light
distribution of blood pressure as well as prevalence of indoor clothing and barefoot or with stockings and partici-
hypertension. pants were weighed to the nearest 0.1 kg with an electronic
The prevalence and severity of overweight status is clearly scale (Girmi, Germany) that was calibrated daily at the begin-
increasing [5] and this increase has also indicated an increase ning of each working day. Height was measured to the nearest
in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and premature 0.1 cm with a tape meter in a vertical erect position, with
onset of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension [6, parallel feet, and with the shoulders and bottom touching the
7]. wall. The height and weight were used to calculate the body
The pathophysiology of obesity-related hypertension is mass index (BMI; kg/m2) using the formula: Weight (kg)
complex, and multiple potential mechanisms contribute to divided by height (m) squared and participants were classified
the development of higher blood pressure in obese children. in Underweight, Normal, Overweight and Obese groups
These include hyperinsulinemia, activation of the renin- based on BMI.
angiotensin-aldosterone system, stimulation of the sympathet- Waist circumference was obtained immediately above the
ic nervous system, abnormalities in adipokines such as leptin, iliac crest and exactly under navel by a tape meter and for hip
direct effects of perinephric fat on the renal parenchyma, and circumference, investigators horizontally positioned the tape
cytokines acting at the vascular endothelial level [8]. meter around the maximum circumference of the buttocks.
The link between obesity and hypertension which may be Consent letter was obtained and participants were referred
mediated in part by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hy- to the reference laboratory and metabolic profiles including
peractivity, includes cardiovascular manifestations such as FBS, BS, cholesterol, TG, LDL, HDL and insulin levels (if
increased heart rate and blood pressure variability, neurohu- necessary) were measured.
moral manifestations such as increased levels of plasma cate- Data were collected and analyzed by descriptive (mean,
cholamine, and neural manifestations such as increased pe- standard deviation and frequency) and analytic statistics by
ripheral sympathetic nerve traffic [9]. one-way ANOVA test and Pearson correlation and p value
Consistent with the SNS hyperactivity hypothesis, high <0.05 was considered statistically significant in SPSS v.16.
blood pressure in children and adolescents is a growing health
problem that is often overlooked by physicians [10]. Since
early interventions to reduce childhood obesity can reduce Results
prolonged BP elevation and the future risk of cardiovascular
disease and other complications [11–13], this article aimed to Eight hundred fifty nine adolescent consisting of 550 (64 %)
investigate the relationship between blood pressure with an- boys and 309 (34 %) girls participated in this study. Although,
thropometric indices and metabolic profile in adolescents. 147 participants had incomplete or missing data form, the
recorded data of these patients was also included in some part
of this study. According to the results, 86.7 % of the partici-
Material and Methods pants had normal blood pressure, 11.4 % had hypertension
and 1.9 % had pre-hypertension.
The present descriptive cross sectional study was conducted in Table 1 demonstrates mean waist and hip circumference,
1005, 12-y-old junior students referred to 15 urban health BMI, weight, height and biochemistry laboratory results such
centers of Rasht. All of these cases were examined by a trained as FBS, LDL, HDL, TG and cholesterol concentration which
physician and data were recorded. were categorized based on three hypertension stages (Normal
Samples were recruited randomly and data were collected blood pressure; pre-hypertension and hypertension).
in a form which consisted of demographic characteristics, Results showed that 84 students (11.4 %) had hypertension
history of disease in samples and their immediate families, and there was no significant relation between results based on
birth weight, physical examination and clinical examinations gender. Also, there was significant relation between hyperten-
including height, weight, blood pressure and body mass index. sive and normotensive group based on metabolic indices
For each patient with high blood pressure in the first visit, two except cholesterol and LDL (p<0.05). However, lipid profile
additional visits were scheduled and mean blood pressure was and FBS in pre-hypertensive group showed no significant
recorded. Blood pressure stages were indicated as normal (a difference (P>0.05).
systolic and/or diastolic BP <90th percentile for age and sex), Table 2 categorizes prevalence of pre-hypertension and
pre-hypertension (a systolic and/or diastolic BP ≥90th percen- hypertension based on BMI which revealed significant differ-
tile but <95th percentile for age and sex) and hypertension (a ence between mean blood pressure and hypertension in obese
systolic and/or diastolic BP ≥95th percentile for age and sex) and normal group (P value <0.01). Also, results showed
Indian J Pediatr

Table 1 Distribution of demographic characteristics, anthropometric indices and metabolic profiles based on hypertension′s stage

Hypertension Stage (based on SBP & DBP)

Normal blood pressure Pre-hypertension (0≤BPI<95) Hypertension (95≤BPI) Total cases

Sex Male Count (%) 423 (87.4) 11 (2.3) 50 (10.3) 484 (100)
Female Count (%) 218 (85.5) 3 (1.2) 34 (13.3) 255 (100)
Total Count (%) 641 (86.7) 14 (1.9) 84 (11.4) 739 (100)
Waist circumference (cm) Mean (+/−SD) 69.6 (11.2) 80.5 (16.9) 78.7 (15.1) * 70.9 (12.3)
Hip circumference (cm) Mean (+/−SD) 84 (10) 93 (13) 91 (12) * 85 (11)
Weight (kg) Mean (+/−SD) 42.9 (12.1) 59.5 (20.5) 54.1 (17.9) * 44.5 (13.7)
Height (cm) Mean (+/−SD) 147.8 (8.5) 148.6 (5.7) 152.9 (8.9) * 148.4 (8.7)
BMI Mean (+/−SD) 19.5 (5.9) 27.1 (10.1) 22.9 (6) * 20.1 (6.2)
Birth weight (g) Mean (+/− SD) 3,274 (604) 3,175 (491) 3,467 (647) 3,297 (604)
FBS (mg/dl) Mean (+/−SD) 92 (7) 92 (5) 95 (8) * 93 (7)
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) Mean (+/−SD) 156 (28) 171(35) 166 (25) 157 (28)
Triglyceride (mg/dl) Mean (+/−SD) 103 (64) 136 (75) 179 (91) * 107 (67)
HDL(mg/dl) Mean (+/−SD) 44 (9) 42(9) 36 (8) * 43 (9)
LDL (mg/dl) Mean (+/−SD) 92 (24) 102 (27) 96 (20) 92 (24)
*
The mean difference was statistically significant (p<0.05)

significant relation between raised BMI and elevated systolic Furthermore, lipid abnormality showed weak and HDL neg-
blood pressure. ative weak correlation with blood pressure.
Figure 1 clearly shows crescendo pattern of hypertension
prevalence in higher BMI categories.
Pearson correlation coefficient showed strong correlation Discussion
between systolic blood pressure with weight, waist and hip
circumferences and insulin level (Table 3). FBS had a very Systemic hypertension in infants and young children is
weak correlation with blood pressure; in addition significant uncommon (<1 %), but is often indicative of an under-
difference between mean FBS in normotensive and hyperten- lying disease process such as secondary hypertension. In
sive groups was noted (92 ± 7 and 95 ± 8 respectively). contrast, the prevalence of primary essential hypertension,

Table 2 Prevalence of blood pressure abnormalities based on BMI classification

BMI Percentile

Underweight Normal Overweight Obesity Total


(BMI<5) (5<BMI ≤85) (85<BMI≤95) (BMI>95)

Systolic blood pressure* Mean (+/−SD) 93 (10) 96 (10) 100 (11) 106 (15) 98 (12)
Diastolic blood pressure $ Mean (+/−SD) 60 (7) 62 (8) 62 (9) 67 (9) 63 (8)
Blood pressure Normal blood pressure 91 (95) 362 (91) 92 (85) 84 (68) 629 (87)
[Count (Percent)]
Pre-hypertension 1 (1) 3 (1) 2 (2) 8 (7) 14 (2)
(90 %≤BPI <95 %)
[Count (Percent)]
Hypertension $ (95 %≤BPI) 4 (4) 34 (9) 14 (13) 31 (25) 83 (11)
[Count (Percent)]
*
Significant statistical difference between all BMI categories with P value <0.01
$
Significant statistical difference between obese group and other BMI classification with P value <0.01. Non-obese group had no significant statistical
differences
Indian J Pediatr

100% HDL. This finding is similar with the results mentioned by


90%
Pinhas-Hamiel et al. They showed that blood pressure is
80%
70% positively related to plasma triglyceride level and negatively
60% with high density lipoprotein cholesterol [6]. The association
50% between blood pressure with hypercholesterolemia and LDL
40%
was weak and no significant difference was detected in blood
30%
20% pressure groups. Therefore, it seems that hyper-
10% triglyceridemia has a considerable effect on blood pressure
0%
Underweight Normal Overweight Obese
in children and adolescents.
NBP 95% 91% 85% 68% The relation between birth weight and blood pressure
PRE-HTN 1% 1% 2% 7%
showed controversial results. Seidman, Daniel S., et al. had
HTN 4% 9% 13% 25%
previously demonstrated that intrauterine environment, as
Fig. 1 Prevalence of hypertension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or reflected by birth weight, had little effect on blood pressure
diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that is ≥95th percentile for age, sex, and
height] in different BMI groups in young men and women. On the other hand, Vasylyeva et al.
indicate that the development of obesity and HTN had been
mostly in older school aged children and adolescents has been related to preterm/LBW [20]. However, the present results
increased parallel to obesity. According to previous investiga- indicate no significant difference between birth weights in 3
tions, approximately 10 % of American youths have pre- hypertension stages and only weak correlation with birth
hypertension and 4 % have hypertension [15, 16]. weight and measured blood pressure.
The present results show significant relation between obe- Among anthropometric indices, the strongest correlation
sity and hypertension. Significant correlation between BMI was detected between hip circumference and systolic hyper-
and systolic and diastolic BP has been observed (R=0.3 and tension. Systolic blood pressure indicated higher correlation
0.21 with p value of <0.05) which is consistent with previous with weight, height and BMI rather than diastolic BP, which is
investigations which report higher chance for hypertension in similar with previous studies which showed stronger correla-
obese children [7, 17]. tion between systolic blood pressure and anthropometric in-
In this study, there was no significant difference between dices rather than diastolic pressure [21, 22].
mean FBS and blood pressure stages and weak correlation
between FBS and BP was found. Blood pressure in patients
with normal and impaired FBS did not show significant
difference. However, Williams et al. has previously demon- Conclusions
strated a positive association between FPG and BP in children
with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [18]. Furthermore, Di According to the mentioned results, weight, waist and hip
Bonito et al. reported that this relation also presents at FPG circumferences, insulin level, high TG and low HDL have
within the normal range [19]. It seems that this difference has been indicated as the strongest correlated factors for high
been observed as a result of higher age group in these studies. blood pressure. Thus, these factors should be investigated
Regarding the association of hyperlipidemia and blood in high risk children and followed in hypertensive child to
pressure, hypertensive group had higher TG and lower monitor cardiometabolic risk factors.

Table 3 Correlation of blood pressure with anthropometric indices and metabolic profile

Height Weight Birth weight AC GC BMI FBS TC TG HDL LDL Insulin

Systolic BP Pearson correlation 0.211* 0.402* 0.146* 0.399* 0.405* 0.319 0.081 0.097* 0.209* −0.155* 0.069 0.343*
P value <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 .028 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 NS 0.001
Number 734 730 539 664 656 726 738 735 738 738 738 88
Diastolic BP Pearson correlation 0.171* 0.275* 0.123* 0.246* 0.241* 0.217 0.093 0.063 0.143* −0.088 0.039 0.353*
P value <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 .013 NS <0.01 0.020 NS <0.01
Number 703 699 525 633 625 697 705 703 705 705 705 83

N/S Not significant; BP Blood pressure; AC Abdominal circumference; GC Grid circumference; TC Total cholesterol; TG Triglyceride; HDL High-
density lipoprotein; LDL: Low density lipoprotein; FBS: Fasting blood sugar; BMI Body mass index
* Statistically significant at p value <0.01
Indian J Pediatr

Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank participants and 10. Riley M, Bluhm B. High blood pressure in children and adolescents.
colleagues in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85:693–700.
11. Lauer RM, Burns TL, Clarke WR, Mahoney LT. Childhood
Conflict of Interest None. predictors of future blood pressure. Hypertension. 1991;18:
I74–81.
Source of Funding Department of Health Center, Guilan University of 12. Stamler J. Epidemiologic findings on body mass and blood pressure
Medical Sciences, Guilan, Iran. in adults. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1:347–62.
13. Gillman MW, Ellison RC. Childhood prevention of essential
hypertension. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 1993;40:
179–94.
References 14. Health NI. Lipid research clinics population studies data book.
Washington: NIH publication No. 80–1527; 1980.
15. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM.
1. Balagopal PB, de Ferranti SD, Cook S, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents.
Hayman LL, et al. Nontraditional risk factors and biomarkers for JAMA. 2010;303:242–9.
cardiovascular disease: mechanistic, research, and clinical consider- 16. Li S, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Bond MG, Tang R, Urbina
ations for youth a scientific statement from the American Heart EM, et al. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and carotid
Association. Circulation. 2011;123:2749–69. vascular changes in adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study.
2. Lucini D, Mela GS, Malliani A, Pagani M. Impairment in cardiac JAMA. 2003;290:2271–6.
autonomic regulation preceding arterial hypertension in humans in- 17. Salvadori M, Sontrop JM, Garg AX, Truong J, Suri RS, Mahmud FH,
sights from spectral analysis of beat-by-beat cardiovascular variabil- et al. Elevated blood pressure in relation to overweight and obesity
ity. Circulation. 2002;106:2673–9. among children in a rural Canadian community. Pediatrics. 2008;122:
3. Flynn JT, Falkner BE. Obesity hypertension in adolescents: epide- e821–7.
miology, evaluation, and management. J Clin Hypertens. 2011;13: 18. Williams DE, Cadwell BL, Cheng YJ, Cowie CC, Gregg EW, Geiss
323–31. LS, et al. Prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and its relationship
4. Raj M, Krishnakumar R. Hypertension in children and adolescents: with cardiovascular disease risk factors in US adolescents. Pediatrics.
epidemiology and pathogenesis. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80:S71–6. 2005;116:1122–6.
5. Ene-Obong H, Ibeanu V, Onuoha N, Ejekwu A. Prevalence of over- 19. Di Bonito P, Sanguigno E, Forziato C, Saitta F, Iardino MR, Capaldo
weight, obesity, and thinness among urban school-aged children and B. Fasting plasma glucose and clustering of cardiometabolic risk
adolescents in southern Nigeria. Food Nutr Bull. 2012;33:242–50. factors in normoglycemic outpatient children and adolescents.
6. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Standiford D, Khoury PR, Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1412–4.
Zeitler P. Increased incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes 20. Vasylyeva TL, Chennasamudram SP, Okogbo ME. Can we
mellitus among adolescents. J Pediatr. 1996;128:608–15. predict hypertension among preterm children? Clin Pediatr.
7. Schiel R, Beltschikow W, Kramer G, Stein G. Overweight, obesity 2011;50:936–42.
and elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents. Eur J Med 21. Fujita Y, Kouda K, Nakamura H, Nishio N, Takeuchi H, Iki M.
Res. 2006;11:97–101. Relationship between height and blood pressure in Japanese
8. Becton LJ, Shatat IF, Flynn JT. Hypertension and obesity: epidemiology, schoolchildren. Pediatr Int. 2010;52:689–93.
mechanisms and clinical approach. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79:1056–61. 22. Ashrafi MR, Abdollahi M, Ahranjani BM, Shabanian R.
9. Voors AW, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Resting heart rate and Blood pressure distribution among healthy schoolchildren
pressure-rate product of children in a total biracial community: the aged 6–13 years in Tehran. East Mediterr Health J. 2005;11:
Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116:276–86. 968–76.

Вам также может понравиться