Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The Subject of Ibn-e-Khaldoon’s study was al’ ijtima ‘al-insani i.e human association.
Although largely unaware of Aristotle’s work he developed his own updated version of
Aristotelian method of study of society as a whole
The analytical empirical method of classifying things which Aristotle used to study states
but ibn e khaldoon used this method to the study of human civilisation on a much wider
sense than Aristotle although he didn’t knew about the exact method to apply the
analytical empirical method but he developed his own way to do it.
His focus was the history of berbers and arabs in the maghrib
His idea was to distinguish between the false and the true reports and he used history
and behaviour of human society to do it
Used Aristotelian method to understand the past which made casual verification
possible and not only “how” but “why” it happened
He distinguished between human societies as badwa, dawla and hadra
Two driving forces in human history; asabiya and mulk
Three possible types of regimes;
1. Natural dominion
2. Devised by men of intelligence and insight
3. Laid down by god and promulgated by an inspired lawgiver.
Questions to answer
1. How can Ibn-e-Khaldoon’s theory of distinguishing between false and true reports
using history and human association be applied in today’s world?
2. How are the three possible types of regimes evolved through history till
contemporary times?
3. Is the concept of social actors being badwa, hadra and dawla void in today’s world or
has it taken some modern form in 21st century human association?
4. How is Ibn-e-Kahldoon an owl of knowledge singing when dusk is falling?