Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
WELDING RESEARCH
SUPPLEMENT TO THE WELDING JOURNAL, JUNE 2017
Sponsored by the American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 1 — Schematic for ultrasonic welding of injectionmolded carbon Fig. 2 — Schematics of the standard dogbone and single lap
fiber/polyamide 66 composites (dimensions in mm). shear specimens (dimensions in mm).
moisture uptake on the weldability of were dried in a vacuum oven at 70°C mass of the sample in the dry state.
ultrasonic welded Cf/PA66 composite. for 48 h to remove surface-absorbed The resulting level of humidity in de-
The changes in the material properties vapor, and W1 specimens were stored pendency of the conditioning proce-
and the microstructure of the weld joint in the normal environment for 30 dure is listed in Table 1.
are also examined. To determine the days. Specimens for W2 to W5 were
critical water content, which has a slight conditioned in various humid environ- Ultrasonic Welding
influence on weld strength, an indica- ments to obtain a certain humidity de-
tion of amplitude during welding is gree. W6 specimens were the redried Ultrasonic welding was performed
proposed. W4 specimens in the vacuum oven at using a KZH-2026 multifunction UW
70°C for 96 h to desorb water com- machine with a nominal power of 2.6
Experimental Procedure pletely. Since conditioning time may kW and a nominal frequency of 20 kHz.
affect the crystallization of the car- The welding setup used in this study is
bon-fiber-reinforced polyamide, all schematically shown in Fig. 1. The
Materials specimens were conditioned for the piezoelectric converter converts the
same duration of 48 h. The specimens electrical signal into mechanical vibra-
Commercial pure PA66 pellets and 2-
were weighed before and after the tions. To transfer the ultrasonic waves
mm-long carbon fiber (24K, T300 type,
moisture absorption to ensure that to the workpiece, the transducer was
Toray Carbon Magic Co. Ltd.) were dried
water content was consistent with the connected to the horn that was placed
in an oven for 8 h at 80°C. The dried
conditioning. The percentage of the at right angles in contact with the work-
pellets and carbon fiber were injection
moisture uptake, M, was calculated for pieces to be welded. The support frame
molded into the 30 wt-% carbon-fiber-
each measurement as follows: of the transducer-booster-horn system
reinforced PA66 plaques with dimen-
sions of 138 × 38 × 2.3 mm. was attached to a pneumatic piston that
mt –m0
M (% ) = 100 ( 1) provided vertical movement along with
m0 the static force (i.e., weld pressure) ap-
Moisture Absorption plied through the horn to the work-
where mt is the mass of the sample af- pieces. The machine was also equipped
The specimens were conditioned in ter being conditioned and m0 is the with data acquisition systems that com-
a climatic chamber, where both tem-
perature and relative humidity can be
monitored, to absorb different levels Table 1 — Moisture Absorptions for Specimens under Different Conditioning Procedures
of water in the specimens. These con-
ditioned specimens were divided into Conditioning Group Temperature Relative Humidity Moisture Content
seven groups that were marked as W0, (°C) (%) (wt%)
W1, W2, W3, W4, W5, and W6, respec-
W0 70 — 0
tively. The moisture absorption equi- W1 30 50 0.4
librium in air is much less than in wa- W2 50 60 0.9
ter (Ref. 20), thus this study revealed W3 50 80 1.7
the workpiece with moisture content W4 50 100 2.6
up to 2.6 wt-%. W5 70 60 2.4
The specimens in the W0 group W6 70 — 0
WELDING RESEARCH
bined with pressure sensor, displace- bone specimens with a gauge of 25 was carried out to investigate the ef-
ment sensor, and timer were integrated mm in length, 6 mm in width, and 2.3 fects of temperature and frequency on
in the controller of the ultrasonic weld- mm in thickness based on ASTM D638 viscoelastic properties of the carbon-
ing machine. were used, as shown in Fig. 2A. For the fiber-reinforced polyamide 66 compos-
The output amplitude of the welding welded joints, single-lap specimens ite. Specimens with dimensions of 38
machine was set to 25 m. The ampli- with the dimensions of 138 × 38 × 2.3 × 8.5 × 2.3 mm were subjected to
tude of the horn was also 25 m when mm with an overlap of 25 mm were three-point bending with a span
vibrated in air. The amplitude curve used, as shown in Fig. 2B. length of 20 mm. An oscillating force
during welding was collected from the To minimize the bending stresses was applied (maximum 4 N) to give
horn displacement. When the ultrason- inherent in the testing of single-lap constant amplitude of deflection of 30
ic vibration was conducted to the welded specimens, filler plates were at- m. Measurements were conducted
Cf/PA66 composite, the high-frequency tached onto both ends of the specimen over the temperature range of 23° to
vibration resulted in a large amplitude using masking tape to accommodate 200°C with a heating rate of 2°C /min
in the Cf/PA66 composite due to the the sample offset. Load vs. displace- and under fixed frequencies (1, 2, 5,
hysteresis effect of the composite and ment results were obtained, as the 10 Hz). The moduli at 20 kHz were ex-
applying it to the horn. Therefore, the specimens were loaded at a stroke rate trapolated by the time temperature
measured amplitude was the combina- of 2.0 mm/min. Joint strengths of the superposition.
tion of the horn and composite surface welded workpieces were evaluated by
amplitudes. The horn amplitude was peak load. Three replicates were per- Results
relatively small; thus, the measured am- formed, and the average joint
plitude can be regarded as the ampli- strengths were reported. Effect of Moisture Absorption
tude of the composite surface during
welding (hereinafter referred to as am-
on Weld Quality
Characterization of the Material
plitude). The welding horn used in this To investigate the influence of hu-
study was made of enhanced 7075 alu- The morphologies of the weld be- midity levels with various tempera-
minum alloy with a size of 18 mm in di- fore/after tensile testing were charac- tures on the weldability of carbon-
ameter and a total length of 134 mm as terized by scanning electron mi- fiber-reinforced polyamide 66, all the
well as a goose length of 54 mm as croscopy (SEM, JSM 6700F). All the conditioned specimens were ultrasonic
shown in Fig. 1. samples were sputter-coated with plat- welded with the same welding parame-
inum for 50 s before SEM analysis to ters of 3000 J weld energy under a
Quasistatic Test induce conductivity. The crystal struc- weld pressure of 0.17 MPa. The results
tures of the dry and wet specimens are listed in Table 2. As shown, the
Quasi-static tests were performed were identified by x-ray diffraction peak load of the welded joints were
by loading each specimen to failure in (XRD, X’Pert PROX) with a copper tar- slightly affected by the humidity when
an MTS 810 tensile tester according to get. The scanning speed was 10 the humidity level was low (i.e., 1 wt-
ASTM D1002-2001. For the quasi- deg/min and scanning angle (2) %), whereas the peak load started to
static tensile specimens of the com- was from 15 to 35 deg for all the decrease significantly when the mois-
posite treated with various moisture specimens. ture content was above 1.7 wt-%. The
(nonwelded specimen), standard dog- The dynamic mechanical analysis peak load of the joint made with the
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 5 — The interaction between water and polyamide. Fig. 6 — The XRD patterns of the dry and wet Cf/PA66 composite.
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
Fig. 8 — VoigtKelvin model for the welding system (Ref. Fig. 9 — The temperature dependence of loss modulus for Cf/PA66 com
22). posite at 20 kHz.
Fig. 10 — Effect of moisture absorption on the ampli Fig. 11 — Effect of moisture content on thew amplitude and weld area,
tude during welding. peak load of the joint.
WELDING RESEARCH
WELDING RESEARCH
chains, which not only plasticized the hermetic enclosure of medical devices. the mechanical properties of glass fiber re-
composite but also changed the loss Medical Engineering & Physics 32: 690–699. inforced polyamide composites. Advanced
modulus of the composite. 8. Chan, W. X., Ng, S. H., Li, K. H. H., Powder Technology 27: 898–902.
3. Fracture surface observations Park, W.-T., and Yoon, Y.-J. 2016. Micro-ul- 20. Timmaraju, M. V., Gnanamoorthy,
trasonic welding using thermoplastic-elas- R., and Kannan, K. 2011. Influence of im-
showed the increase in moisture re-
tomeric composite film. Journal of Materi- bibed moisture and organoclay on tensile
sulted in a decreased weld area, in- als Processing Technology 236: 183–188. and indentation behavior of polyamide
creased voids, and more severe defor- 9. Qiu, J., Zhang, G., Asao, M., Zhang, 66/hectorite nanocomposites. Composites:
mation around the voids, especially for M., Feng, H., and Wu, Y. 2010. Study on Part B 42: 466–472.
high moisture content (>1 wt-%). the novel ultrasonic weld properties of het- 21. Sateesh, N., Rao, P. S., Ravishanker,
Thus, joint with high moisture content erogeneous polymers between PC and D. V., and Satyanarayana, K. 2015. Effect
exhibited interfacial fracture. PMMA. International Journal of Adhesion & of moisture on GFRP composite materials.
4. The deleterious effect of water Adhesives 30: 729–734. Materials Today: Proceedings 2: 2902–2908.
absorption on the weldability of 10. Benatar, A., Eswaran, R. V., and Na- 22. Benatar, A. 1989. Ultrasonic weld-
Cf/PA 66 can be reversed by complete- yar, S. K. 1989. Ultrasonic welding of ther- ing of PEEK graphite APC-2 composites.
moplastics in the near-field. Polymer Engi- Polymer Engineering and Science 29:
ly redrying the workpiece before ultra-
neering and Science 29: 1689–1698. 1705–1721.
sonic welding. 11. Rani, R. M., Suresh, K. S., Prakasan, 23. Rani, M. R., and Rudramoorthy, R.
5. The joint strength increased lin- K., and Rudramoorthy, R. 2007. A statistical 2013. Computational modeling and experi-
early with the amplitude and was in- study of parameters in ultrasonic welding of mental studies of the dynamic perform-
fluenced slightly by moisture when the plastics. Experimental Techniques 31: 53–58. ance of ultrasonic horn profiles used in
amplitude was larger than 100 m 12. Parmar, U., and Pandya, D. H. 2016. plastic welding. Ultrasonics 53: 763–772.
during welding. Therefore, the ampli- Experimental investigation of ultrasonic 24. Balkan, O., Demirer, H., and
tude was proposed as an indication in welding on non-metallic material. Procedia Yildirim, H. 2008. Morphological and me-
monitoring weld quality. Technology 23: 551–557. chanical properties of hot gas welded PE,
13. Tanaka, K., Honda, S. M. H., PP and PVC sheets. Journal of Achievements
Katayama, T., and Enoki, S. 2013. Effect of in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering
References water absorption on the mechanical prop- 31: 60–70.
erties of carbon fiber/polyamide compos- 25. Glowska, A. W., and Pietras, A.
ites. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materi- 2012. Influence of the welding parameters
1. Powell, C. E., and Beall, G. W. 2006. als Engineering 7: 520–529. on the structure and mechanical properties
Physical properties of polymer/clay 14. Launay, A., Marco, Y., Maitournam, of vibration welded joints of dissimilar
nanocomposites. Current Opinion in Solid M. H., and Raoult, I. 2013. Modelling the grades of nylons. Archives of Civil and Me-
State and Materials Science 10: 73–80. influence of temperature and relative hu- chanical Engineering 12: 198–204.
2. Senthilvelan, S., and Gnanamoorthy, midity on the time-dependent mechanical 26. Zhu, L., Wang, C., and Qiu, Y. 2007.
R. 2006. Damping characteristics of unre- behaviour of a short glass fibre reinforced Influence of the amount of absorbed mois-
inforced, glass and carbon fiber reinforced polyamide. Mechanics of Materials 56: 1– ture in nylon fibers on atmospheric pres-
nylon 6/6 spur gears. Polymer Testing 25: 10. sure plasma processing. Surface & Coatings
6–62. 15. Jia, N. Y., and Kagan, V. A. 2001. Technology 201: 7453–7461.
3. Karsli, N. G., and Aytac, A. 2013. Mechanical performance of polyamides 27. Ye, L., Lu, M., and Mai, Y.-W. 2002.
Tensile and thermomechanical properties with influence of moisture and tempera- Thermal de-consolidation of thermoplastic
of short carbon fiber reinforced polyamide ture — Accurate evaluation and better un- matrix composites — I. Growth of voids.
6 composites. Composites: Part B 51: 270– derstanding. Plastics Failure Analysis and Composites Science and Technology 62:
275. Prevention, pp. 95–104. 2121–2130.
4. Botelho, E. C., Figiel, L., Rezende, M. 16. Grammatikos, S. A., Zafari, B., 28. Vlasveld, D. P. N., Groenewold, J.,
C., and Lauke, B. 2003. Mechanical behav- Evernden, M. C., Mottram, J. T., and Bersee, H. E. N., Mendes, E., and Picken, S.
ior of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide Mitchels, J. M. 2015. Moisture uptake J. 2005. Analysis of the modulus of
composites. Composites Science and Technol- characteristics of a pultruded fibre rein- polyamide-6 silicate nanocomposites using
ogy 63: 1843–1855. forced polymer flat sheet subjected to moisture controlled variation of the matrix
5. Diao, H., Robinson, P., Wisnom, M. hot/wet aging. Polymer Degradation and properties. Polymer 46: 6102–6113.
R., and Bismarck, A. 2016. Unidirectional Stability 121: 407–419. 29. Fernandez Villegas, I. 2014.
carbon fibre reinforced polyamide-12 com- 17. Christian, S. J., and Billington, S. L. Strength development versus process data
posites with enhanced strain to tensile fail- 2012. Moisture diffusion and its impact on in ultrasonic welding of thermoplastic
ure by introducing fibre waviness. Compos- uniaxial tensile response of biobased com- composites with flat energy directors and
ites: Part A 87: 186–193. posites. Composites: Part B 43: 2303–2312. its application to the definition of opti-
6. Ageorges, C., Ye, L., and Hou, M. 18. Sturm, R., Grimberg, R., Savin, A., mum processing parameters. Composites:
2001. Advances in fusion bonding tech- and Grum, J. 2015. Destructive and non- Part A 65: 27–37.
niques for joining thermoplastic matrix destructive evaluations of the effect of 30. Levy, A., Le Corre, S., and Fernan-
composites: A review. Composites: Part A moisture absorption on the mechanical dez Villegas, I. 2014. Modeling of the heat-
32: 839–857. properties of polyester-based composites. ing phenomena in ultrasonic welding of
7. Amanat, N., James, N. L., and Composites: Part B 71: 10–16. thermoplastic composites with flat energy
McKenzie, D. R. 2010. Welding methods 19. Chaichanawong, J., Thongchuea, C., directors. Journal of Materials Processing
for joining thermoplastic polymers for the and Areerat, S. 2016. Effect of moisture on Technology 214: 1361–1371.
QIAN ZHI, XINRONG TAN, and ZHONGXIA LIU (liuzhongxia@zzu.edu.cn) are with the School of Physics and Engineering, Zhengzhou
University, Zhengzhou, China.