Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
For example in Africa, 8.5% of preschool children were overweight during the same year and it
is estimated that 12.7% of children (<5 years) will be affected in Africa by 2020 [8]. In few cases,
obesity is caused by some genetic abnormalities [9]. Obesity can be attributed to certain medical
causes such as hypothyroidism, hormonal growth deficiency or side effects of certain
medications such as steroids [10]. However, several factors acting at different periods of growth
are associated with overweight and obesity in children [11]. Socioeconomic status, level of
education, marital status and BMI of parents, maternal smoking during pregnancy, sex, birth
weight and the child's birth rank [7,12–14], area of residence [15,16] and some nutritional factors
such as early introduction (<6 months of age) of solid foods and fruits [14,17] have been found
as predictors of childhood overweight and obesity. Tabacchi et al [11] suggested in their
literature review and a new classification of the early determinants of childhood obesity that
religion can influence food behaviors through the definition of rules that identify the group,
making it different from the others. Otherwise, it can influence eating style and consequently
weight status.
Single risk factors for obesity, including illnesses and behavioural factors, are often
reported in the literature. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obesity were
examined by Fliers et al (2013), who found that boys with ADHD aged 10-17 years and girls
aged 10-12 years were more likely to be overweight than children in the general Dutch
population. Hendrix et al (2014) considered developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and
obesity and concluded that children with DCD appeared to be at increased risk of obesity, which
increased with age and severity of motor impairment.
However, no previous studies have reported on the association between childhood obesity
and any illness or an association between obesity and the number of illnesses. This was,
therefore, of interest as these children are likely to be in contact with healthcare professionals on
a regular basis. The association between lifestyle factors such as food intake and exercise and
obesity are well documented in the literature. Many studies have reported a relationship between
physical activity and obesity, for example, Nagel et al (2009) and Wijtzes et al (2014). Mistry
and Puthussery’s (2015) systematic review revealed that eight of the 11 studies found a lack of
physical activity had a significant positive correlation with obesity. There is a mixed picture
when considering the association between childhood obesity and the intake of sugar-sweetened
drinks. Papandreou et al (2013) concluded that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages was
associated with childhood obesity, whereas Jensen et al (2013) reported only limited association
between sweet drink intake and body mass index (BMI) z-scores among Australian children and
young people. This may be because of measurement issues, and it is likely that as more data are
collected a standard methodology for measuring intake will be agreed, helping comparability
between studies. While single risk factor studies that explore associations with obesity are
helpful, there are fewer studies that consider a broad range of potential risk factors collectively in
a large sample. Bingham et al (2013) used stratified random sampling of 17,136 Portuguese
children to consider a variety of risk factors. In the UK the focus of studies over the past ten
years has moved towards determining if there is a relationship between socioeconomic
inequalities and childhood obesity. El-Sayed et al (2012) produced a systematic review of the
evidence in this field identifying that, of the three studies using the Index of Multiple
Deprivation, two found significant associations between deprivation and obesity. This study
revealed measurement issues, including the use of 17 different measures of childhood obesity
and 20 different measures of socioeconomic position in the 23 studies reviewed. A study that
used an existing dataset to explore multiple risk factors for obesity was therefore appealing to
allow consideration of multiple risk factors for obesity. The Welsh Health Survey (WHS) for
Children provided cross-sectional data collected from 3,000 children a year from 2008 to 2012
with multiple potential risk factors for obesity collected as standard. The WHS had not been used
for this purpose previously. Data were collected all year round to avoid any seasonal variation in
responses to questions. The WHS used stratified random sampling to ensure good age and
geographical spread of children. The sample frame was all residential addresses in Wales. The
household sample was selected from the Royal Mail’s postcode address file, an up-to-date list of
all addresses that is maintained by the UK Royal Mail (2010). The literature showed that risk
factors for early childhood were different from later childhood, for example, for early childhood
risk factors such as breastfeeding (Yan et al 2014); age at weaning (Sloan et al 2008); and
parental obesity (McLoone and Morrison 2014) were important. This study focused on the older
children sampled, aged 4-15 years. Aim The aim of this study was to determine important risk
factors associated with childhood obesity from the data in the WHS. The study was conducted in
2015-16, based on WHS data from 2008 to 2012.
Although all children and adolescents are at risk for obesity and should be screened, there are
several specific risk factors, including parental obesity, poor nutrition, low levels of physical
activity, inadequate sleep, sedentary behaviors, and low family income.3 Risk factors associated
with obesity in younger children includematernal diabetes,maternal smoking, gestational weight
gain, and rapid infant growth. A decrease in physical activity in young children is a risk factor
for obesity later in adolescence. Obesity rates continue to increase in some racial/ethnic minority
populations. These racial/ethnic differences in obesity prevalence are likely a result of both
genetic and nongenetic factors (eg, socioeconomic status, intake of sugar-sweetened beverages
and fast food, and having a television in the bedroom).3 The prevalence of obesity is
approximately 21% to 25% among African American and Hispanic children 6 years and
older.2,3 In contrast, the prevalence of obesity ranges from 3.7% among Asian girls aged 6 to 11
years to 20.9% among non-Hispanic white adolescent girls.2,3
Children develop eating habits during childhood that have immediate and long-term
consequences for their health and weight status [7]. Evidence suggests that children learn what,
when, and how much to eat through family, culture, and environmental influences [7]. Parents
are critical in helping their children develop and maintain healthful eating habits and food
preferences [7,8]. Parental feeding practices, strategies that parents use to influence children’s
eating (e.g., preferences and amounts), may be particularly important influences in the early
years [9,10]. A growing body of research suggests that parental feeding practices may be
associated with children developing unhealthy eating habits (e.g., consuming excessive
quantities, eating in the absence of hunger, emotional eating, etc.) that increase the risk of
overweight and obesity [7,9,11,12]. Cultural, socioeconomic, and psychological factors shape
parents’ perceptions of and practices related to child feeding and eating behaviors [7,11]. The
decision to breastfeed is the first feeding decision parents make that has long-lasting
consequences for their children’s health and weight status [13]. Overall, the effects of
breastfeeding on risk of child obesity are conflicting. Some studies suggest that breastfeeding
confers protection against childhood overweight and obesity [13,14], and that the protective role
of breastfeeding may be due to: (1) rate of weight gain in infancy, and (2) self-regulation of
energy intake [13,14]. On the other hand, some studies have found that breastfeeding has little
[15] or no impact [16] on children’s body mass index (BMI), and suggest that increasing
breastfeeding is unlikely to reduce the global epidemic of childhood obesity. Recent scientific
evidence suggests associations between non-responsive parental feeding practices (e.g., use of
overly restrictive, controlling, rewarding, or pressure feeding), unhealthy eating habits among
children (e.g., disinhibited eating, lack of self-regulation of food intake, etc.) [7,9,10], and
increased risk of child overweight and obesity [10]. The use of non-responsive food-related
parenting feeding practices may negatively impact children’s current and future eating habits
because they interfere with children’s innate internal hunger and satiety cues [7,9,10]. Specific
eating habits such as skipping breakfast, excessive snacking, consumption of fast food, and/or
intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have been linked with the risk of overweight and
obesity in children [17–19]. Furthermore, unhealthy eating habits like under-responsiveness to
internal satiety cues (low satiety responsiveness) and over-responsiveness to external food cues,
such as taste, smell, availability, and Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 436 3 of 18
emotions (high enjoyment of food, food responsiveness, and emotional overeating) are
associated with an increased risk of child overweight and obesity [20–22]. Associations between
non-responsive parental feeding practices, unhealthy child eating habits, and an increased risk of
child overweight and obesity have primarily been studied in the Western context, so there is a
need to determine if similar patterns occur in SE Asia. The objectives of this systematic literature
review were to: (1) identify and summarize findings from existing studies examining
associations between non-responsive parental feeding practices, unhealthy child eating behaviors,
and risk of overweight and obesity in children aged 2–12 years living in SE Asia; (2) highlight
the limitations of current studies; and (3) generate suggestions for future research.