Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.tft.csiro.au
Dr Allan De Boos
allan.deboos@tft.csiro.au
After 10 years of decline in wool prices and sheep numbers, some stability appears to
have returned to the Australian wool production industry. This stability has resulted
from improved global economic conditions, a restructuring of sectors of the industry
and improvements in wool production techniques, aided by improvements on the
processing of wool and the development of new products. This article reviews the
technical developments that continue to affect the industry and its future and
highlights some of the important contributions made by CSIRO Textile & Fibre
Technology.
lthough wool production in Australia was initiated to service the British textile
industry and market, Australian wool is now exported worldwide. Asian markets
(including India) now account for 60% of the total exports of raw wool and tops from
Australia with direct exports to Europe/Turkey declining to 33% (by weight). The
China/Hong Kong market has risen to around 32% of Australia’s raw wool exports.
These figures reflect the continuing movement of the wool processing industry from
Western Europe to Asia. Italy remains the biggest European processor of Australian
wool and the largest importer of Australian fine (<19um) wools. Italian mills
specialise in the production of high-quality products from the finer Australian wool
types.
The advances in the technology of wool production and processing result from the
improvements in farming, animal husbandry and fabric production that have occurred
Decision-support systems for issues such as pasture improvement and sheep nutrition
have been introduced to assist in optimising wool production on-farm while ensuring
sustainability and appropriate integration with good environmental practice. The
recent reductions in sheep numbers have reflected the movement of farmers to more
profitable areas of farming in response to poor wool prices rather than their ability to
grow wool. A more recent feature of wool farming is the development of intensive
wool production techniques, in which sheep are penned in large sheds rather than
being allowed to wander on grass-covered ‘paddocks’. This type of farming allows
control over the diet of sheep, which in turn affects the quality of the wool produced
and ensures the wool remains clean and protected from the weather. Some of the
finest quality Australian wool is being grown this way, although, at this time, it only
represents a very small proportion of the Australian wool clip.
One of the biggest changes that has occurred in the wool industry in the last 50 years
has been the introduction of objective measurement of raw wool and its subsequent
impact on marketing[1]. Prior to 1970, while some testing of raw wool was conducted
after sale to measure those characteristics important in processing and product
performance, the value of wool prior to auction was assessed subjectively by wool
brokers. As a result of extensive work by the Australian Wool Corporation, CSIRO
and the Australian Wool Testing Authority (AWTA), technologies were developed
which allowed for the extensive, rapid sampling of the Australian wool clip and the
measurement of the most commercially-significant characteristics of the raw wool
prior to sale. In 1972-3, a system of ‘sale by sample’ was introduced in which buyers
could view only a small sample of the wool as well as test data on the average fibre
diameter, yield and vegetable matter in the sale lot. Subsequently other test methods
for staple length and strength and colour were also introduced, although the latter
measurement has yet to be widely requested. All the major wool-growing countries in
the world eventually adopted this method of selling. The certification of the properties
of raw wool and top for commercial purposes is now controlled through the
regulations and specifications of the International Wool Textile Organisation (IWTO),
headquartered in Brussels. Under these regulations and specifications more than 98%
of the Australian clip is now sampled and tested prior to sale. In Australia this testing
is carried out almost exclusively by the AWTA.
During this period, in response to price movements and overall market trends, the
amount of wool finer than 21um has risen from 37% to more than 50% and the
production of 19um and finer has more than doubled its share of the clip. The use of
fine wool allows the manufacture of lighter weight, softer handling products, both key
trends in the apparel market over the last twenty years. Moreover, the discomfort
sometimes associated with garments manufactured from coarse wool can be reduced
and finally eliminated by the use of fine wool. Wool undergarments manufactured
from 18.5um wool (or finer) have been found to be highly suitable for next-to-skin
wear. Wool as fine as 13.5um (finer than cashmere), is now being offered for sale.
Fibre objective measurement techniques have had considerable impact on the pastoral
management and animal husbandry techniques required to shift the mean fibre
diameter of flocks or individual sheep. Objective measurement of wool samples taken
from the mid-side of sheep is now an important technique for the selection of
breeding stock.
Until recent years, the classing or classification of wool during shearing or harvesting
was done subjectively by trade experts called ‘wool classers’. With improvements in
the speed and accuracy of the techniques used to measure fibre diameter, instruments
have now been introduced for objectively measuring each fleece immediately after
shearing. An instrument developed by CSIRO Textile & Fibre Technology (CTFT)
called Sirolan Fleecescan™ has recently been introduced for direct measurement of
the weight, mean fibre diameter and the variation in fibre diameter (Fig 3) of
individual fleeces immediately after shearing[2]. This additional information allows
the classer to classify the fleece in a more reliable and reproducible way. This
technology appears set to revolutionise the way in which fleeces are assembled for
sale.
2 Wool Scouring
The number of wool scouring lines used world-wide has decreased in response to both
the reduction in global greasy wool production and an increase in the production
capacity of existing and new scouring lines. This trend has been especially noticeable
in Western Europe where labour costs are high. The latest scouring lines that have
been installed in Australia and New Zealand are three metres wide, enabling very high
production rates. Modern scouring lines incorporate computer control systems that
enable scouring conditions to be changed to suit the type of wool being scoured. One
example is the Siroscour® system (developed by CTFT and manufactured by
ANDAR-ADM Group), which is based on a 3-stage scouring principle and achieves
high recovery of wool wax with effective and constant liquor flow management
throughout the entire scouring process (Fig 4). This system provides opportunities for
various effluent management options.
Environmental pressures are also the major factor in the relocation of wool scouring
out of Europe and Japan into China and other low labour cost countries. The trend in
the design of effluent treatment plants has been towards systems that do not have an
aqueous discharge with the recovered water being recycled to the scouring line. Three
types of system are currently used; evaporation/incineration, evaporation and
integrated modular. Sirolan SWIMS® (Scour Waste Integrated Management Systems
[4] developed by CTFT and marketed by ANDAR-NZ) is an example of an integrated
modular design encompassing a number of different technologies, the particular
combination used depending on the needs of the mill. A major focus of this sytem
involves consideration of greasy wool contaminants as a potential resource rather than
a waste.
The environmental problems associated with wool scouring and the potential for
reduced entanglement has led to renewed interest in solvent scouring. Wooltech, a
solvent scouring system based on trichloroethylene (ICI-Triwool), was launched at
ITMA in 1995. It is claimed that the solvent treatment improves the characteristics of
the scoured wool [3].
3. Topmaking
In the manufacture of wool yarns, two major production routes are used: woollen and
worsted. The more important production route is worsted (85-90% of Australian
wool), the first stage of which is topmaking, a term used to describe the series of
processes (including carding, gilling and combing) used to convert scoured wool into
an aligned sliver. In both routes the first operation in the process of aligning the fibres
for spinning is called carding, an operation which also removes a large amount of
vegetable matter remaining in the wool.
Advances in long-staple drawing (gilling) have been incremental over the last few
years. Although output speeds of 450 m/min are now achievable, refinements in
reliability and flexibility have been the most recent features. Drafts are now set
electronically and can also be read directly from the display units.
Two combs, which perhaps typify the advances made in combing, are the N.
Schlumberger & Cie (NSC) PB33 and the Sant Andrea Novara (SAN) P100. The
major new features of the PB33 comb include:
• Speed of operation up to 260 cycles/min;
• The circular brush can be removed and replaced without major disassembly of the
comb - the operation taking only 10 to 20 seconds;
The P100 is radically different to previous SAN combs and possibly to any other
comb currently on the market. This comb also operates at 260 cycles/min and the
circular brush can be removed in five to seven seconds. There are also a number of
other major innovations on this machine.
A large proportion of wool dyeing takes place at the top stage after which the sliver
must be re-combed. However, it is now becoming routine for most spinning mills to
also re-comb undyed tops in order to improve spinning performance and reduce faults.
One of the most important developments of the last 10 years in topmaking has been
the development of methods of predicting the processing performance of wool from
objective measurements made on the raw wool. The greasy wool characteristics and
the processing parameters from scouring to topmaking all determine the yield and the
properties of the top. The TEAM formulae, developed as a result of the Trials
Evaluating Additional Measurements project collaboration between CSIRO, the
Australian Wool Testing Authority and the Australian Wool Corporation, are simple
regression formulae prediction tool [5]. These equations can be used to predict the
fibre length characteristics in the top and the combing waste and use the following
measurements of the greasy wool.
• Fibre diameter (um),
• Staple length (mm),
• Staple strength (N/ktex),
• Mid-breaks (%),
• Vegetable matter base (%).
The TEAM formulae are used extensively in the benchmarking of mill performance
and in process improvement.
Two alternative software prediction packages used by the wool industry are Sirolan-
TOPSpec®, developed by CTFT [6] and TopMaker from Aust Software for
Topmaking P/L [7]. These tools are more sophisticated than TEAM in that the
processing potential of single sale lots and the subsequent blend of the lots can be
predicted. In addition to the greasy wool measurements described above, inputs,
which include staple length, greasy weight and number of bales per sale lot, provide
greater information on the predicted fibre length distribution. Woolgrowers also use
these objective measurements as management tools to provide information for sheep
selection and the ranking of animals in terms of their processing potential.
3. Spinning
Ring spinning remains the dominant form of spinning used for wool, primarily
because it is seen to produce a superior yarn to alternate spinning systems. Several
improvements to long staple ring spinning were on display at ITMA99 in Paris. The
one creating the most interest was compact or condensed spinning (Suessen - EliTe
and Zinser - Air-Com-Tex). The claimed benefits included improved yarn strength
and elongation, reduced yarn hairiness, improved weaving efficiency and less fibre
attrition during knitting. A collapsed balloon worsted spinning frame (Gaudino,
Air-jet spinning (Suessen and Murata) and friction spinning (DREF) systems are
available for wool but have not found wide adoption. Short wool (40 to 45mm) is
being spun on the OE system but the speeds achievable are not as high as for cotton.
Contaminant build-up in rotors is cited as a problem.
Just as for the spinning of cotton and synthetic fibres, there has been a big move to
automation in worsted spinning. However, one problem that has had to be overcome
in worsted spinning is that wool singles yarns are normally steamed before winding to
reduce twist liveliness. Several companies have now introduced in-line steamers for
bobbins still on a conveyor and the winder manufacturers have improved their
machines to allow winding of twist-lively yarns by maintaining the yarn ends under
tension. Pneumatic splicing is routine for wool yarns and quality splicing is
particularly important for weavable singles yarns, where hot air splicing
(Thermosplicer - Schlafhorst) is recommended.
Two-folding in the form of 2-for-1 twisters (rather than ring-twisting) has become the
standard method of producing folded wool yarns.
Yarn hairiness can also be measured on-line during winding. Moreover, it is now
possible, with electronic tagging of bobbins, to measure yarn quality in winding and
generate a list of individual spinning frame spindles that need attention. In general,
the demand for automation is increasing in high labour-cost countries while there has
been a very marked trend for spinning to move to the low labour-cost countries in
Asia and Eastern Europe.
To ensure that wool competes successfully with other fibre types, systems have been
developed to predict yarn properties and spinning performance from the properties of
the top. This continues a trend in the measurement of the properties of wool in its
various forms and prediction of subsequent processing performance that starts in the
shearing shed. A software tool, Sirolan Yarnspec® [8], is available to predict the
spinning performance and yarn properties that should be achieved from a given top.
The number of fibres in the yarn cross-section is the dominant factor and, given
spinning frame parameters such as ring size and speed, it is possible to both predict
‘best practice’ and benchmark mill performance. This work has clarified the relative
importance of fibre diameter, diameter distribution, length, crimp and fibre strength in
spinning. It is has also shown that longer mean fibre length is better, within the range
available, and that length distribution is of little importance (contrary to industry
beliefs).
The principle dyes used for wool in order of production volume are; metal-complex,
chrome, acid levelling/milling and reactive dyes. Globally the relative proportions
have changed very little over the last decade or so, although regional preferences have
shifted.
The major dyestuff manufacturers have responded to the concerns over chromium by
promoting alternative metal-free dyes. New reactive dyes (eg Lanasol CE – Ciba) and
optimised ranges of metal-free acid dyes (Sandolan MF – Clariant) have been
developed to achieve a balance of economy and performance comparable to chrome
dyes in targeted applications such as piece and hank dyeing, especially bright fashion
shades.
New auxiliaries have also developed to improve dyehouse productivity and product
quality. Valsol-LTA-N (developed by CTFT with ICI Australia[11]) has the
additional benefits of reducing chromium in effluent from metal complex dyes to
complement the established advantages of good levelness and reduced damage.
Basolan AS (BASF) inhibits loss of bulk in package dyeing (Fig 7) and damage to the
dyed wool [12]. This type of technology is finding use in a number of applications,
particularly the dyeing of wool-polyester blends at temperatures up to 120°C where
the protective effect is claimed to be better than older style formaldehyde-release
agents.
Another recently released wool specific chemical is Lanalbin APB (Clariant), which
is applied during scouring and prevents photobleaching of areas of carpet exposed to
strong light.
There are relatively few manufacturers of finishing machinery actively engaged in the
development of new machines for wool fabrics. Most of the developments in finishing
have been directed at the processing of fabrics made from the newer synthetic fibres,
(particularly microfibres). However, the development of wool-elastane fabrics to
meet consumer demand for apparel with excellent stretch characteristics has also
impacted on the techniques used to finish wool. Tension control has become an
important feature of all wool finishing machinery in both the woven and knitted
sectors. All manufacturers stress the appropriateness of their machinery for stretch
fabric as, in the same way 8-10 years before, the gentle action machinery to control
delicate fabrics had been an important selling point. The gentle action machinery has
remained but the emphasis has shifted to tension control of stretch fabric. Many
manufacturers of finishing equipment see flexibility as a key to competitiveness, so
that wool is not ignored in the development of dyeing and finishing equipment.
The development of functional finishes has also been a high priority for
manufacturers of wool fabrics. Finishes to impart machine washability, shape
retention, stain resistance, flame retardance and combinations of these effects to wool
knitted and woven fabrics are now available for use in both fashion apparel and work
wear.
Consistent with the development of measurement and predictive systems for raw
wool, top and yarn, instrumentation has also been developed for the measurement of
those fabric properties related to its performance in applications such as apparel. Two
sets of instrument are widely used to measure the properties of wool fabrics; the KES-
F system developed in Japan[13] and SiroFAST®, developed by CTFT (Fig 8) in
Australia[14]. This instrumentation is used to measure aspects of fabric handle, to
predict performance in garment manufacture and, more recently, to develop optimal
finishing routines to maximise the quality of the input fabric. The systems are used
much more widely on wool fabrics than fabrics derived from other fibres, primarily
because the value associated with wool fabrics justifies the cost of the instrumentation
and the testing.
Other value-added wool blends, normally with stretch characteristics and containing a
number of different fibre types, can also be found at the many fabric shows
worldwide. These novel, value-added blends may be an important component of the
future growth of Australian wool.
5. Conclusions
In reviewing the wool industry in Australia and developments in wool processing and
fabric manufacture, two consistent trends are apparent. In spite of its relatively minor
position in the overall world textile market, Australian wool maintains an important
position in the quality apparel market. Developments in wool processing from sheep’s
back to fabric are continuing, and considerable effort is being invested in developing
new products for wool to meet changing consumer demands and expectations.
Secondly, the wool industry has invested heavily in the concept of objective
measurement for quality assurance and the prediction of processing performance.
Wool is measured many times between sheep’s back and fabric and these
measurements are used in the optimisation of activities as diverse as animal
husbandry and fabric finishing. Woolgrowers now regularly consider the final end-
use of their fibre in their on-farm decisions and the separation that exists between the
various sectors of the wool-processing pipeline is being slowly eroded. This can only
be to the benefit of Australian wool.
This article was compiled from contributions of the following scientists at CSIRO
Textile & Fibre Technology; Dr P. Gordon (wool production), Dr J. Christoe
(scouring), Mr M. Prins (topmaking), Dr P. Lamb (spinning), Dr D. King (dyeing), Dr
A. De Boos (finishing). Support for the CSIRO Textile & Fibre Technology projects
described in this paper was provided by Australian Woolgrowers and the Australian
Government through CSIRO and the Woolmark Company.
References