Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Amy Doan
Professor Dib
FWIS 109
30 November 2017
A Confrontation of Nature
Living in the city and in the suburbs, we often lose sight of what unbridled, open
nature looks like and where our food is sourced from. Agnes Denes, a Hungarian-born
American conceptual artist, created a prominent land art piece titled Wheatfield: A
Confrontation in 1982 to bring this issue to the fore. Within a six month period, Agnes
cleared trash from a two acre landfill in lower Manhattan near the World Trade Center
and Wall Street and planted a wheatfield over it. Over a thousand pounds of wheat was
harvested from this field and then transported around the globe as part of "The
International Art Show for the End of World Hunger." Wheatfield: A Confrontation
evokes the duality of mankind’s relationship with nature both as a sanctuary and a
resource. In doing so, this work questions the priorities people have in regards to the
in the rural countryside for a simple lifestyle closer to nature. As seen in photographs of
the land art, the juxtaposition of a lush, rolling field of golden wheat against gray,
imposing skyscrapers is reminiscent of our desire to flee from the city. Despite the
opportunities and resources aplenty in the city, we still covet the idea of living in
untouched nature, of escaping all of the negative financial and social burdens
Doan 2
associated with the city. Leo Marx, a history professor at MIT, finds that there is “soft
veil of nostalgia that hangs over our urbanized landscape” that remains from the period
of time where our society was composed of an uncomplicated land of “forests, villages,
and farms dedicated to the pursuit of happiness” (6). The fact that Denes chose to
cultivate such a huge, valuable piece of land in the largest city of the United States
parallels our willingness to exchange some aspects of urbanization to make room for
nature. Our desire to incorporate nature into our lives can be seen in each of our 58
national parks and in our outdoors-centered hobbies like gardening and camping. By
confronting New York with a giant field of wheat, this art piece brings nature closer to
Denes’ choice of wheat as the focal point of her art portrays our dependence on
nature to sustain us. Wheat is a staple crop that can be milled into flour, distilled into
grain alcohol, woven into straw, and more. By choosing wheat from other staple crops
like rice and corn, Denes points to its versatility as a plant and the fact that so many
people globally depend on it for food. Yet despite the global reliance on wheat, we, as
Americans, rarely see it in its unprocessed form. Weintraub, an American art writer and
curator, points out that “due to our capacity to import goods and export wastes, where
people live [no longer] determines what they consume” so long as one has the funds to
obtain it (24). It is easy for us Americans to savor our tropical fruits and drink our
Arabica coffee while turning a blind eye to the rest of the world hungering while we draw
from their natural resources. Wheatfield reminds America of the value of life and its
and by extension, nature, plays a significant role in the global economy. We tear up
forests and natural terrain across the world to plant profitable crops that not only puts
food in our mouths but also money in our pockets. Raymond Williams, a Welsh novelist
and critic, contends that the “operation on nature [is] producing wealth, and objections
aesthetic of unspoilt nature but the need to upturn it for money proves greater. With
Wheatfield, Denes forces us to confront the consequences of agriculture that are not
addressed in the pastoral ideal. That lush, rolling field of golden wheat might look
serene and pleasing but it echos the toll agriculture takes on the environment, such as
polluting waterways with fertilizer runoff and decreasing biodiversity by taking the land
away from the wildlife. Agriculture can also be harmful to us. Wheatfield’s location is
detrimental to our society because it wastes valuable real estate that could otherwise be
used for a more profitable building. What is more, Wheatfield’s proximity to Wall Street,
a major center of global commerce and trade, symbolizes the ever-lessening gap
between nature and culture despite our penchant to separate mankind from nature. We
tend to view separateness from nature “as a sign of progress and a mark of civilization”
(Weintraub 8) yet Denes contradicts this principle of civilization by planting a huge field
of wheat in the middle of wealthy, populous New York. Wheatfield addresses the
negative effects of both our use of nature and bringing nature closer to the city.
By transforming two acres of landfill into functional art that is simultaneously able
to support life, Denes illustrates nature’s constant cycle of rebirth and growth in
Doan 4
Wheatfield: A Confrontation. Even though the piece only lasted half a year and was
constructed in 1982, it is still relevant now especially considering that not much has
changed in our treatment of nature and the unsolved problem of world hunger. The land
art piece uses a visual juxtaposition to confront our hypocritical relationship with nature:
we uproot it for our own gain while at the same time, expect it to look pristine to
Works Cited
Marx, Leo. “Sleepy Hollow, 1844.” The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the
Weintraub, Linda. To Life!: Eco Art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet. University of
Verso, 1980.