Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
5. What is the difference between Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification?
The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system was developed at the turn of the 20th century and was specifically
created to categorize books and other items held in the Library of Congress. It features 21 subject categories with
resources being identified by a combination of both letters and numbers. For example, books on education are identified
with a call number that begins with the letter “L” and those on political science under “J.” The number of classes and
numerous subclasses is not restricted. Specific topics and geographic areas are often represented by alphabetic Cutter
lists. LCC notation does not lend itself to abridgment, except all the way to the summary level.
The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system was developed in 1876 as a means to organize all knowledge. The
DDC uses notation in Arabic numerals, well-defined categories, well-developed hierarchies, and a rich network of
relationships among topics. The ten basic classes are organized by disciplines or fields of study. Each main class is
further divided into ten divisions, and each division into ten sections. Except for a few optional provisions, the DDC
notation is strictly numeric. (See Alternate DDC notation for information about the optional alphabetic notation applied by
the Library of Congress.) In addition to summaries, the DDC has an abridged edition, with numbers that are the same as
the numbers of the full edition, except shorter. (See Segmentation for information about segmentation marks that show the
end of abridged numbers.)
6. If I have a Library of Congress Classification Number, how can I find out what the Dewey number should be?
Classification Web is a subscription service which provides a number of correlation searching options, including LCC to
DDC correlation functionality. There are very few one-to-one relationships between LCC and DDC, and they are
scattered; most relationships are many-to-many. AutoDewey takes advantage of one of the few areas where LCC and
DDC are similar enough to have clusters of one-to-one or one-to-few matches.
8. What is the cooperative arrangement between the Library of Congress and OCLC?
The Library of Congress and OCLC partner with each other under a formal cooperative agreement that OCLC will
maintain an editorial office at the Library of Congress.
Libraries use classification systems to organize the books on the shelves. A classification system uses letters and/or
numbers (call numbers) to arrange the books so that books on the same topic are together. This arrangement results in
"serendipitous browsing:" you find one book in the catalog, go to the shelf, and, an even better book is sitting right next to
it.
Libraries in the United States generally use either the Library of Congress Classification System (LC) or the Dewey
Decimal Classification System to organize their books. Most academic libraries use LC, and most public libraries and K-
12 school libraries use Dewey.
LB
Read the first line in alphabetical order:
A, B, BF, C, D... L, LA, LB, LC, M, ML...
2395
Read the second line as a whole number:
1, 2, 3, 45, 100, 101, 1000, 2000, 2430...
.C65
The third line is a combination of a letter and numbers. Read the letter alphabetically. Read the number as a decimal, eg:
.C65 = .65 .C724 = .724
Some call numbers have more than one combination letter-number line.
1991
The last line is the year the book was published. Read in chronological order:
1985, 1991, 1992...
If you ask a librarian whether he or she prefers the Dewey Decimal System or Library of Congress Classification,
be ready for a geeked out discussion on the merits of hierarchical vs. faceted classification schemes and whether
capping the number of categorization classes holds peril or potential. . . . If you're a newcomer to library science, a little
background on the classification systems might be helpful.
The Dewey Decimal System was developed in 1876 as a means to organize all knowledge - an ambitious endeavor, to say
the least. In this sense, the Dewey Decimal System was the Google of the 19th century, minus the fancy technical aspects.
Instead, the cataloging system relies on a simple framework that starts with ten subject classes (religion, social sciences,
etc.). These classes are broken down into ten divisions, which are then broken down into ten subdivisions. Books and
other resources are assigned numeric call numbers based on where content within them falls in this taxonomy of
knowledge.
The Library of Congress Classification system differs in its design. Developed at the turn of the 20th century, it was
specifically created to categorize books and other items held in the Library of Congress. It features 21 subject categories
with resources being identified by a combination of both letters and numbers. For example, books on education are
identified with a call number that begins with the letter 'L' and those on political science under 'J.' The number of
categorization classes are not restricted, nor are the numerous subclasses included in the system.
So which system is better? That depends on the person you ask. Proponents of Dewey may suggest that the LOC system is
'impure' because, rather than being based on a taxonomy of knowledge, it was created to classify items from a single
library. Some also believe that the letter-number system of identification is laborious and second best to Dewey's all
numeric approach. Supporters also cite the system's reliance on facets (or groupings of related subjects) to organize
materials.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, people who prefer the LOC have their criticisms of Dewey. Many perceive shortcomings of that
system's ability to catalog items covering new subjects. For instance, computers weren't around when Dewey was
developed and, as a result, weren't accounted for under the ten subject category headings. While the system has been
updated over time, a closed taxonomy has forced computers and other tech topics to be shoehorned into a category labeled
'General.' (The LOC system, on the other hand, has annexed a 'Technology' subject heading.) Detractors of Dewey also
suggest that its decimal system for identifying items leads to long call numbers that make identifying resources
cumbersome, particularly in academic libraries with groupings of specialized topics.
While some librarians and other bibliophiles have a strong preference for either Dewey or the LOC system, many others
concede that both systems have flaws and that libraries should follow practices that are best for their respective
collections. Many public libraries, for example, continue to use Dewey while some academic libraries have made the
switch to LOC to allow for greater specialization in identifying resources.
Still other librarians are forsaking both systems for more simplistic subject-based taxonomies typically found in
bookstores. This move, made in response to perceived consumer habits, has many purists up in arms and has prompted
initiatives to develop a hybrid system that is intuitive to users but still allows for detailed classification. Perhaps in the
future, then, a new classification system heavyweight will emerge in this battle for categorization supremacy.
The J.D. Williams Library uses the Library of Congress (LC) classification. Like the Dewey Decimal classification
system, LC is used both as an unique identifier for each book in the library and as a way to group books with similar
subjects together on the shelves. Note the similarities and differences in the two classification systems in the table below,
using the book "A Quick Reference to Dining Etiquette" by Shelia M. Long as an example.
Library of What is it? How it was made?
Congress
L Education
N Fine Arts
Q Science
R Medicine
S Agriculture
T Technology
U Military Science
V Naval Science
F History: America
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
F336-350 Mississippi
BL-BX Religion
DA Great Britain
GN Anthropology
DC France
GR Folklore
DD Germany
GV Recreation. Leisure.
DP Spain - Portugal
H Social Sciences
DS Asia
HA-HJ Business (Economics, Industries, Finance)
HF5600- Accounting P Language And Literature
5689
PC Romance Languages
HM-HX Sociology
PD Germanic Languages
HQ The Family. Marriage. Women.
PE English Language
HV Social Pathology. Social and Public Welfare.
Criminology.
PL Chinese and Japanese Languages and
Literature
J Political Science
PN Literature (General)
K Law
PN1600- Drama (Films, Theater, etc.)
KF Law: U.S. 3307
NA Architecture QB Astronomy
NB Sculpture QC Physics
HF Commerce
But there are other forms that call numbers can take. For example:
Title: More West Highland tales
Author: John Francis Campbell
.L8 Louisbourg
PS American literature
HA Statistics
.A5 Title
The average call number has four lines on a book label, and each of those lines are read differently.
The first line is made up of 1-3 letters, and is read in alphabetical order.
A B BC BF CJ D G GE GR H
The second line is made up of whole numbers, and is read numerically. The numbers in
this line may sometimes have decimals.
This line is called the cutter number, which usually represents the author's last name, but
can also stand for the name of a corporation or the book's title. It is read first
alphabetically by letter, and then the numbers are read as a decimal.
.D12 .D3 .G45 .G5 .G56 .G564 .G5643 .G6 .G67 .H2
The last line is the year of publication, and is read in chronological order.
1654 1776 1796 1854 1910 1959 1959b 1978 1999 2001
Ending the call number may be letters or numbers designating the book's order in a
series or set. They are read either numerically (v.1, v.2, v.3, ...) or alphabetically
(ser.A, ser.B, ...). Some common examples are:
v.1 Volume 1
ser.B Series B
Suppl Supplement
The call number may also end with a copy number (c.2, c.3, ...). This is used to tell
multiple copies of the same book apart.
L Mezzanine A