Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No.

TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

SUMMARY
1 Dead Load of Slab = 150.38 mton
2 Dead Load of I Girder or Box Girder = 87.52 mton
3 Pier Cap Load = 54.47 mton
2
4 Pier Cross Section Area = 2.54 m
5 M
Moment t off IInertia
ti off Pier,
Pi IL = 0.52
0 52 m2
6 Moment of Inertia of Pier, IT = 0.52 m2
7 Base Area of Open Foundation = 30.00 m2
8 Length of Footing = 5.00 m
9 Width of Footing = 6.00 m
3
10 Volume of Open Foundation = 24.74 m
11 Weight
W i ht off O
Open ffoundation
d ti = 59 38
59.38 mton
t
12 Weight of Soil Overburdon = 46.82 mton

Calculation of Dead Loads

1A Dead Load due to Deck Slab

5425

Width 2712.5 2712.5

Thick 275 275 275

If applicable, type 1 else 0 = 1

Density of RCC Concrete = 2.400 mton/m3
Cross Section of Slab = 2.984 m2
Weight of Slab per Meter = 7.161 mton/m
Additional Allwance, if any = 5.0 %
Overall Span = 20.000 m
Total Weight of Slab = 150.38 mton

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

1C Dead Load due to I - Girder

If applicable, type 1 else 0 = 1

Nos. of Girders = 3
Cross Section Area at Support, Asupport = 1.40 m2
Distance of Uniform Support Section = 0.40 m
C
Cross S ti Area
Section A att Intermediate
I t di t Section,
S ti AInter = 0.70
0 70 m2
Distance of Intermediate Variable Section = 0.10 m
Cross Section Area at Mid Span, AMid = 0.52 m2
Distance of Variable Section = 5.00 m
Distance of Constant Mid Span Section = 4.05 m

Total Length of Girder Considered = 19.10

19 10 m
Total Span, C/C of Pier = 20.00 m
3
Density of Prestressed Concrete = 2.500 mton/m
Weight of One Girder = 29.175 mton
Total weight of 3 Girders = 87.52 mton

1B Dead Load due to Box Girder

If applicable, type 1 else 0 = 0

Cross Section Area at Support, Asupport = 5.70 m2
Distance of Uniform Support Section = 1.50 m
Cross Section Area at Mid Span, AMid = 4.10 m2
Distance of Variable Section = 15.00 m
Distance of Constant Mid Span Section = 14.75 m

Total Span, C/C of Pier = 31.25 m

Density of Prestressed Concrete = 2.500 mton/m3
Total weight of Box = 0.00 mton

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

2 Dead Load due to Pier Cap

8400 2450

1 700

2 700

2000 2450

Density of RCC Concrete = 2.400 mton/m3

Part 1
Length = 8.400 m
Width = 2.450 m
Height = 0.700 m
Volume of Part 1 = 14.406 m3

Part 2
Length at top = 8.400 m
Width at top = 2.450 m

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Area at Top = 20.580 m2

Length at bottom = 2.000 m

Width at bottom = 2.450 m
Area at bottom = 4.900 m2

Height = 0 700
0.700 m
Volume of Part 2 = 8.288 m3

Total Volume of Pier Cap = 22.694 m3

Weight of Pier Cap = 54.467 mton

3 Pier Section

d
1 2 3
Circular Square Reactangle

S L

d
4
Rectangle with Circular Cut Water

Density of RCC Concrete = 2.400 mton/m3

Shape of Pier = 1

Input Diameter, d = 1.80 m

Not Applicable = 1.80 m

Area of Pier = 2.54 m2

Moment of Inertia in Longitudinal Direction, IL = 0.52 m4
Moment of Inertia in Transverse Direction, IT = 0.52 m4

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

4A Dead Load due to Open Foundation and Weight of Soil Overburdon

2200 3000

1
Shape 1 500

2 650

9200 3000

3000

Density of RCC Concrete = 2.400 mton/m3

If applicable, type 1 else 0 = 0
Part 1
Top Length = 2.200 m
Top Width = 3.000 m
Top
p Area = 6.600 m2

Bottom Length = 9.200 m

Bottom Width = 3.000 m
Bottom Area = 27.600 m2
Height = 0.500 m
Volume of Part 1 = 7.949 m3

Part 2
Bottom Length = 9.200 m
Bottom Width = 3.000 m
Bottom Area = 27.600 m2

Length at bottom = 9.200 m

Width at bottom = 3.000 m
Area at bottom = 27.600 m2

Height = 0.650 m
Volume of Part 2 = 17.940 m3

Total Volume of Foundation = 889 m3

25.889
25
Weight of Open Foundation = 0.000 mton

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Depth of Footing below NGL/Bed Level/OGL = 2.500 m

3
Volume above Founding Level = 69.00 m

Less Volume of Foundation = 25.889 m3

L
Less V
Volume
l off Pier
Pi = 3 435 m3
3.435

Net Volume of Soil Overburdon = 39.675 m3

Density of Soil Overburdon = 1.000 mton/m3

Weight of Soil Overburdon = 0 000

0.000 mton

4B Dead Load due to Open Foundation

2000 2000

1
Sh
Shape 2 650

2 500

5000 6000
(Transverse)

6000

3
Density of RCC Concrete = 2.400 mton/m
If applicable, type 1 else 0 = 1
Part 1
Top Length = 2.000 m
Top Width = 2 000
2.000 m
Top Area = 4.000 m2

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Bottom Length = 5.000 m

Bottom Width = 6.000 m
Bottom Area = 30.000 m2
Height = 0.650 m
Volume of Part 1 = 9.740 m3

Part 2
Bottom Length = 5.000 m
Bottom Width = 6.000 m
Bottom Area = 30.000 m2

Length at bottom = 5.000 m

Width at bottom = 6.000 m
Area at bottom = 30.000 m2

Height = 0.500 m
Volume of Part 2 = 15.000 m3

Total Volume of Foundation = 24.740 m3

Weight of Open Foundation = 59 376 mton
59.376

Depth of Footing below NGL/Bed Level/OGL = 2.500 m

3
Volume above Founding Level = 75.00 m

Less Volume of Foundation = 24.740 m3

Less Volume of Pier = 3.435 m3

Net Volume of Soil Overburdon = 46.825 m3

Density of Soil Overburdon = 1.000 mton/m3

Weight of Soil Overburdon = 46.825 mton

G:\Tangent\Job Folder\2019_Jammu Udhampur Bridges\Design\TTS-2019-DN-105, Design of Continuous Fixed Pier\Revision, R0\TTS-2019-DN-105,R0, D, Pier and Foundation Design
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

S. No. Description
Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span
Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
Nos of Lanes
Nos. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1
Live Load Case Reference No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Remarks

1 Formation Level in m 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379 742.379
2 Left Span in m 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
3 Left Bearing Distance in m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
4 Right Span in m 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
5 Right Bearing Distance in m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
6
7 O/A Width of Bridge in m 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850 10.850

DETAILS
8 Wearing Coat Thickness in m 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056
9 Depth of Structure in m 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925 1.925
10 Bearing Thickness in m 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150
11 Pedestal Height in m 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511 0.511
12 ept of
Depth o Pier
e Cap (St
(Straight
a g t Portion)
o to ) in m 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500 0.500
0 500
DIMENSIONAL

13 Depth of Pier Cap (Inclined Portion) in m 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650 0.650
14 Width of Piercap in m 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200 2.200
15 Length of Piercap in m 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200 9.200
16 Type of Pier Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular Circular
17 Diameter/Thickness of Pier in m 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800
18 Width in Transverse Direction in m 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800
19 Area of Pier in m 2 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545
20 Width of Open Foundation (Transverse) in m 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000
Length of Open Foundation
21 in m 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000
(Longitudinal)
22 Depth of Open Foundation in m 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150 1.150
23 Base Area of Open Foundation in m 2 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000
3
24 Volume of Open Foundation in m 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740 24.740
25
26 Pier Cap Top RL in m 739.737
739 737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737 739 737
739.737
27 Pier Top RL in m 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587 738.587
28 Natural Ground Level RL in m 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198 736.198
29 Depth of Pier Below NGL in m 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665 2.665
LEVELS

30 Top of Open Foundation RL in m 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533 733.533
31 Founding Level of Open Foundation RL in m 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383
32 HFL in m 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383
33 LWL i m
in 732 383
732.383 732.383
732 383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383 732 383
732.383
34 Designed Water Level, RL in m 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383
35 Remarks
36 Reference Level, RL in m 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383 732.383
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
37
3
38 Density of Water for Buoyancy in mton/m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

DATA
39 Density of RCC Concrete in mton/m 3 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400
3
40 Density of Soil in mton/m 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800 1 800
1.800

GENERAL D
41 % Live Load Considered % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0
42
43 If Bridge is in Curve Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
44 Radius of Curvature, R in m 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0
45 Designed Velocity, V in kM/Hr 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0
46
47 Seismic Zone 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
48 Longitudinal Seismic Coefficient α hL 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.180

DATA
49 Transverse Seismic Coefficient α hT 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.077 0.075 0.075 0.077 0.075 0.075 0.180
50 Increase in Seismic Coefficient 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
51 Vertical Seismic Ratio SEISMIC 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Seismic Combination Factor in
52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Longitudinal Direction
Seismic Combination Factor in
53 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Transverse Direction
Seismic Combination Factor in Vertical
54 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Direction
55
56 Type of Bearing, if Elastomeric Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
57 Distance from Neutral Point, L in m 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
L

58 Temperature Constant, α in / O C 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06 11.5E-06
O
59 Temperature Range, T in C 40.0 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
60 Movement due to Temperature, Δ in mm 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60
61
62 Length of Bearing lo in mm 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
63 Width of Bearing bo in mm 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
64 Side Cover to bearing c in mm 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
2
65 Effective Plan Area of Bearing Aeff in mm 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184
66 Height of Total Elastomer h in mm 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
67 Shore Hardness of the Rubber A 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Static Modulus of Elastomeric Bearing
68 MPa 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
as per UIC 772 2R
If any other value of G, Input Value of G
69 MPa 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
as per Tests
Shear Modulus of Bearing Considered in
70 Gs MPa 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
the Design
71 Factor for Dynamic Shear Modulus 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Shear Modulus of Elastomer for Seismic
72 Gd MPa 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13
Action
73
Nos of Supports line of Bearing on
74 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Continuous Structure
Nos of Supports Lines of Bearings on
75 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Designed Pier
76 No of Bearings on Designed Pier 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
77
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
78 COMPUTATION OF VERTICAL LOADS
79
Dead Load Reaction of I Girder from
80 in mton 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 0.0
Left Span

N
AD LOAD - LEFT SPAN
81 Additional Allowances in DL in % 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
82 Additional Allowances in DL in mton 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.0
83 Allowances for Splicing & Stiffners in % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
84 Allowances for Splicing & Stiffners in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dead Load Reaction of I Girder with All
85 in mton 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 0.0
Allowances
2
86 C/S Area of RC Slab in m 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

DEA
87 Dead Load due to RC CS Slab in mton 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 0.0
Total Dead Load Reaction from Left
88 in mton 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 0.0
Span
89
Dead Load Reaction of I Girder from
90 in mton 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8 43.8
HT SPAN
Right Span
91 Additional Allowances in DL in % 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
92 Additional Allowances in DL in mton 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
DEAD LOAD - RIGH

93 Allowances for Splicing & Stiffners in % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
94 Allowances for Splicing & Stiffners in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dead Load Reaction of I Girder with All
95 in mton 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0
Allowances
2
96 C/S Area of RC Slab in m 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
97 Dead Load due to RC Slab in mton 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2 75.2
Total Dead Load Reaction from Right
98 in mton 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1
Span
p
99
Total Dead Load Reaction from Both
100 in mton 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 121.1
Span
101
Super Imposed Load Intensity of Left
102 in mton/m 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0
Span
LOADS

Dead Load Reaction due to Super

103 in mton 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Imposed Load from Left Span
SUPERIMPOSED L

104
Super Imposed Load Intensity of Right
105 in mton/m 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Span
Dead Load Reaction due to Super
106 in mton 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Imposed Load from Right Span
107
Total Dead Load Reaction due to Super
108 in mton 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0
Imposed Load
109
Footpath Live Load Reaction from Left
110 in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LIVELOADS
FOOTPATH

Span
Footpath Live Load Reaction from Right
111 in mton 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7
Span
Total Footpath Live Load Reaction from
112 in mton 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7
Both Span
113
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
Vehicular Live Load Reaction from Left
114 5.4 10.8 0.0 10.8 5.4 10.8 0.0 5.4 10.8 0.0 0.0

VEHIICULAR
in mton

ELOADS
Span
Vehicular Live Load Reaction from Right
115 in mton 36.3 72.6 75.7 72.6 36.3 72.6 75.7 36.3 72.6 75.7 0.0
Span

LIVE
Total Vehicular Live Load Reaction from
116 in mton 41.7 83.3 75.7 83.3 41.7 83.3 75.7 41.7 83.3 75.7 0.0
Both Span
117
118 Total Live Load without FPLL in mton 41.7 83.3 75.7 83.3 41.7 83.3 75.7 41.7 83.3 75.7 0.0

LOAD
SUMMARY
119 Total Live Load with FPLL in mton 48.4 90.1 82.4 90.1 48.4 90.1 82.4 48.4 90.1 82.4 6.7
120 Percentage Live Load Considered % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 0.0

LIVE
121 Designed Live Load without FPLL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 41.7 37.8 20.8 41.7 37.8 0.0

S
L
122 Designed LiLive
e Load with
ith FPLL in
i mton
t 48.4
48 4 90.1
90 1 82.4
82 4 90.1
90 1 24.2
24 2 45.0
45 0 41.2
41 2 24.2
24 2 45.0
45 0 41.2
41 2 0.0
00
123
124 Load due to Pedestals in mton 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
125 Loads due to TSL and LSR in mton 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
126 Load of Pier Cap in mton 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5
D OF SUB
127 Height of Pier in m 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1
TURE
2
128 Cross Section of Pier in m 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545
129 Load of Pier in Dry Condition in mton 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 30.9
STRUCT
DEAD LOAD

130 Buoyancy Percentage % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
131 Bouyancy of Pier in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
132 Bouyancy of Pier Cap in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Dead Load of Substructure without
133 in mton 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3
Buoyancy
Total Dead Load of Substructure with
134 in mton 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3 95.3
Buoyancy
135
YANCY AND SEISMIC

Total Vertical Load without bouyancy

136 in mton 456.0 497.7 490.0 497.7 431.8 452.6 448.8 431.8 452.6 448.8 286.5
effect
137 Vertical Seismic Coefficient 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00
138 Due to Vertical Seismic in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 18.2 18.1 17.4 18.2 18.1 0.0
EFFECT

Total Vertical Load including bouyancy

139 in mton 456.0 497.7 490.0 497.7 449.2 470.9 466.9 449.2 470.9 466.9 286.5
& Seismic effect (Maximum Load)
BOUY

Total
T t lVVertical
ti l LLoad
d iincluding
l di b bouyancy
140 in mton 456.0 497.7 490.0 497.7 414.4 434.4 430.7 414.4 434.4 430.7 286.5
& Seismic effect (Minimum Load)
141
142 Weight of Open Foundation in mton 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4
OUNDATION

143 Weight of Open Foundation Considered in mton 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4 59.4
144 Effect of Bouyancy on Foundation in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Considered Effect of Bouyancy on Open
FO

145 in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Foundation
146
147 Weight of Soil Overburdon in mton 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8
148
Total Vertical Load including
149 bouyancy & Seismic effect (Maximum 562.2 603.9 596.2 603.9 555.4 577.1 573.1 555.4 577.1 573.1 392.7
MARY

in mton
Load)
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R

SUMM
Total Vertical Load including
150 bouyancy & Seismic effect (Minimum in mton 562.2 603.9 596.2 603.9 520.6 540.6 536.9 520.6 540.6 536.9 392.7
Load)
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
151
152 MOMENT IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION
153
154 % Live Load Considered % 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 00
0.0

L
GENERAL
Seismic Combination Factor in
155 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Longitudinal Direction
156 Seismic Coefficient Considered 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.000
157
Horizontal Force Acting at Bearing Level

ZONTAL
158 in mton 4.6 4.6 6.7 4.6 2.3 2.3 3.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 0.0
due to Braking
Force due to Shearing of Elastomeric
159 in mton 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05

EFFECT OF HORIZ
Bearing
B i

FORCE
160 Horizontal Force Acting at Bearing Level in mton 5.7 5.7 7.7 5.7 3.4 3.4 4.4 3.4 3.4 4.4 1.1
161 Bearing Level, RL in m 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4
162 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Moment due to Horizontal Force Acting
163 in mton.m 45.6 45.6 61.9 45.6 27.0 27.0 35.2 27.0 27.0 35.2 8.4
at Bearing Level
164
165 Water Current Forces in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
166 Water Current Moments in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
167
168 Unbalanced Reaction Due to DL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 121.1
169 Unbalanced Moment Due to DL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.6
MOMENT

170 Unbalanced Reaction Due to SIDL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
171 Unbalanced Moment Due to SIDL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
172 Unbalanced Reaction Due to FPLL in mton 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7
UNBALANCED M

173 Unbalanced Moment Due to FPLL in mton.m 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4
Designed Unbalanced Moment Due to
174 in mton.m 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0
FPLL
175 Unbalanced Reaction Due to LL in mton 30.9 61.8 75.7 61.8 30.9 61.8 75.7 30.9 61.8 75.7 0.0
176 Unbalanced Moment Due to LL in mton.m 15.4 30.9 37.8 30.9 15.4 30.9 37.8 15.4 30.9 37.8 0.0
Designed Unbalanced Moment Due to
177 in mton.m 15.4 30.9 37.8 30.9 7.7 15.4 18.9 7.7 15.4 18.9 0.0
LL
178
Vertical Load of Superstructure for
179 in mton 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3 242.3
Seismic Action
180 Horizontal Seismic on Super Structure in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 19.5 19.5 0.0
181 Acting above Pier Cap Level in m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
182 Acting RL in m 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2
183 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9
Horizontal Seismic Moment on Super
184 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 153.3 153.3 153.3 0.0
Structure
185 Horizontal Seismic on Pier Cap in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 4.4 4.4 0.0
186 Acting below Piercap Top in m 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
187 Acting RL in m 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1
188 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
189 Horizontal Seismic Moment on Pier in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 29.6 29.6 0.0
190 Horizontal Seismic on Pier in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.0
191 Acting RL in
i m 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1 736.1
736 1
192 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7
C
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R

SEISMIC
193 Horizontal Seismic Moment on Pier in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 0.0
194 Seismic on Open Foundation N N N N N N N N N N N
195 Horizontal Seismic on Open Foundation in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

EFFECT OF S
196 Acting RL in m 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0
197 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Horizontal Seismic Moment on Open
198 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Foundation
199
200 Vertical Load of SIDL for Seismic Action in mton 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0
201 Horizontal
Hori ontal Seismic on SIDL in
i mton
t 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 5.6
56 5.6
56 5.6
56 0.0
00
202 Acting above Formation Level in m -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
203 Acting RL in m 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4
204 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
205 Horizontal Seismic Moment on SIDL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 45.2 45.2 0.0
206
207 Seismin on Live Load N N N N N N N N N N N
Vertical Reaction of LL for Seismic
208 in mton 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3 151.3
A i
Action
209 Horizontal Seismic on LL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
210 Acting above Pier Cap Level in m 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
211 Acting RL in m 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2 740.2
212 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9
Horizontal Seismic Moment on
213 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vehicular Live Load
214
SUMMARY

Total Longitudinal Direction

215 in mton 5.7 5.7 7.7 5.7 3.4 3.4 4.4 35.4 35.4 36.4 1.1
Horizontal Force

216 Total Longitudinal Direction Moment in mton.m 64.4 79.8 103.1 79.8 36.4 44.1 55.8 273.7 281.4 293.0 69.0
217
218 MOMENT IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION
219
220 % Live Load Considered % 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 100 0
100.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 50 0
50.0 00
0.0
GENERAL
L

Seismic Combination Factor in

221 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Transverse Direction
222 Seismic Coefficient Considered 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.075 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
223
224 Horizontal Force Acting at Bearing Level in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
ZONTAL
ECT OF

ORCE

225 Bearing Level, RL in m 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4 740.4
HORIZ
EFFE

FO

226 Lever A
L Arm att Reference
R f Level
L l i m
in 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0 80
8.0
Moment due to Horizontal Force Acting
227 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
at Bearing Level
228
229 If Bridge is in Curve Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
L FORCE

230 Radius of Curvature, R in m 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0 280.0
231 Designed Velocity, V in kM/Hr 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0
CT OF

232 Total Vertical Live Load Reaction, W in mton 41.7 83.3 75.7 83.3 20.8 41.7 37.8 20.8 41.7 37.8 0.0
GAL

233 Centrifugal Force, C = W*V2/127R in mton 5.0 9.9 9.0 9.9 2.5 5.0 4.5 2.5 5.0 4.5 0.0
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R

CENTRIFUG
EFFE
234 Acting above Formation Level in m 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
235 Acting RL in m 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6
236 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2
Horizontal Transverse Moment due to
237 in mton.m 55.4 110.9 100.7 110.9 27.7 55.4 50.3 27.7 55.4 50.3 0.0
Centrifugal Force
238
239 Water Current Forces in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
240 Water Current Moments in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
241
242 Eccentricity Due to DL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
243 Unbalanced Moment Due to DL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

NT
UNBALANCED MOMEN
244 Eccentricity
Eccentricit Due
D e to SIDL in
i mton
t 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00 0.0
00
245 Unbalanced Moment Due to SIDL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
246 Eccentricity Due to FPLL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
247 Unbalanced Moment Due to FPLL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Designed Unbalanced Moment Due to
248 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL
249 Eccentricity Due to LL in mton 3.63 1.88 2.33 1.88 3.63 1.88 2.33 3.63 1.88 2.33 1.88
250 Unbalanced Moment Due to LL in mton.m 151.0 156.2 176.3 156.2 151.0 156.2 176.3 151.0 156.2 176.3 0.0
U

Designed Unbalanced Moment Due to

251 in mton.m 151.0 156.2 176.3 156.2 75.5 78.1 88.1 75.5 78.1 88.1 0.0
LL
252
Total Dead Load Reaction from Left
253 in mton 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 0.0
Span
Horizontal Seismic Forces from Left
254 in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 9.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Span
255 Acting above Formation Level in m -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934
256 Acting RL in m 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4
257 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1
Horizontal Seismic Moment from Left
258 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.4 82.3 82.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Span
259
Total Dead Load Reaction from Right
260 in mton 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1 121.1
Span
Horizontal Seismic Forces from Right
g
261 i mton
in t 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0 93
9.3 91
9.1 91
9.1 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0
Span
262 Acting above Formation Level in m -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934 -0.934
263 Acting RL in m 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4 741.4
264 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1
Horizontal Seismic Moment From Right
265 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.4 82.3 82.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Span
266
267 Horizontal Seismic on Pier Cap in mton 0.0
0 0 0.0
0 0 00
0.0 0.0
0 0 42
4.2 41
4.1 41
4.1 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0 00
0.0
268 Acting below Piercap Top in m 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
269 Acting RL in m 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1 739.1
270 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
271 Horizontal Seismic Moment on Pier Cap in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.3 27.6 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
272 Horizontal Seismic on Pier in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
273 Acting RL in m 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1 736.1
274 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37 3.7
37
275 Horizontal Seismic Moment on Pier in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
276 Seismin on Pile Cap N N N N N N N N N N N
277 Horizontal Seismic on Pile Cap in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

MIC
278 Acting RL in m 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0 733.0

OF SEISM
279 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 0 6
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6 06
0.6
280 Horizontal Seismic Moment on Pile Cap in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
281 Horizontal Seismic Moment on DL in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 121.4 118.4 118.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
282

EFFECT
283 SIDL Reaction from Left Span in mton 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Horizontal Seismic on SIDL from Left
284 in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Span
285 Acting abo
above Level
e Formation Le el in
i m 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10 1.0
10

E
286 Acting RL in m 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4 743.4
287 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Horizontal Seismic Moment on SIDL
288 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 28.9 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
from Left Span
289
290 SIDL Reaction from Right Span in mton 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Horizontal Seismic on SIDL from Left
291 in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
S
Span
292 Acting above Formation Level in m 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
293 Acting RL in m 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8 742.8
294 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4
Horizontal Seismic Moment on SIDL
295 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 27.3 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
from Left Span
296
297 Seismic on Live Load Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Vertical Reaction of LL for Seismic
298 in mton 5.4 10.8 0.0 10.8 5.4 10.8 0.0 5.4 10.8 0.0 0.0
Action from Left Span
299 Horizontal Seismic on LL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
300 Acting above Formation Level in m 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
301 Acting RL in m 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6
302 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2
Horizontal Seismic Moment on
303 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vehicular Live Load
304
Vertical Reaction of LL for Seismic
305 in mton 36.3 72.6 75.7 72.6 36.3 72.6 75.7 36.3 72.6 75.7 0.0
Action from Right Span
306 Horizontal Seismic on LL in mton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.7 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
307 Acting above Formation Level in m 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
308 Acting RL in m 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6 743.6
309 Lever Arm at Reference Level in m 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2
Horizontal Seismic Moment on
310 in mton.m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 30.5 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vehicular Live Load
311
SUMMARY

Total Transverse Direction Horizontal

312 in mton 5.0 9.9 9.0 9.9 34.6 37.9 37.2 2.5 5.0 4.5 0.0
Force

313 Total Transverse Direction Moment in mton.m 206.5 267.1 276.9 267.1 384.5 425.5 427.2 103.2 133.5 138.5 0.0
314
315
316
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
Total Vertical Load including
317 bouyancy & Seismic effect (Maximum in mton 562.2 603.9 596.2 603.9 555.4 577.1 573.1 555.4 577.1 573.1 392.7
Load)
Total Vertical Load including

FINAL SUMMARY
318 bouyancy & Seismic effect (Minimum in mton 562.2 603.9 596.2 603.9 520.6 540.6 536.9 520.6 540.6 536.9 392.7
Load)
Total Longitudinal Direction
319 in mton 5.7 5.7 7.7 5.7 3.4 3.4 4.4 35.4 35.4 36.4 1.1
Horizontal Force

320 Total Longitudinal Direction Moment in mton.m 64.4 79.8 103.1 79.8 36.4 44.1 55.8 273.7 281.4 293.0 69.0

Total Transverse Direction Horizontal

321 in mton 5.0 9.9 9.0 9.9 34.6 37.9 37.2 2.5 5.0 4.5 0.0
Force

322 Total Transverse Direction Moment in mton.m 206.5 267.1 276.9 267.1 384.5 425.5 427.2 103.2 133.5 138.5 0.0
323
324
325
326 Stiffness of Pier & Calculation of Seismic Coefficient
327
328 Cross Section of Pier A in m 2 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545 2.545
Moment of Inertia in Longitudinal
329 IL in m 4 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515
Direction
Moment of Inertia in Transverse
330 IT in m 4 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515 0.515
Direction
331
332 G d off Concrete
Grade C t off Pier
Pi M i MP
in MPa 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
333 Modulus of Elasticity of Pier, E in GPa 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50 31.50
334 Modulus of Elasticity of Pier, E in mton/m 2 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0 3150000.0
335
Pier Cap Top to Top of Open
336 in m 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204 6.204
Foundation, h3
Effective Height of Pedestal + Bearing in
337 in m 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661 0.661
o g tud a Direction,
Longitudinal ect o , h1
338
CG of Super Structure and Pile Cap Top
339 in m 8.486 8.651 8.623 8.651 8.486 8.651 8.623 8.486 8.651 8.623
or Footing Top
CG of Super Structure and Pier Cap Top
340 in m 2.282 2.447 2.419 2.447 2.282 2.447 2.419 2.282 2.447 2.419
in Transverse Direction, h2
341
Fh AG ⎛ h3 h2 ⎞
342 = Δ = P⎜ 3 + 3 (h1orh2 )⎟
343 Δ h ⎝ 3EI 2 EI ⎠
344
345 If Elastomeric Bearing is Provided Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
346 Length of Bearing lo in mm 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
347 Width of Bearing bo in mm 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
348 Side Cover to bearing c in mm 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
349 Effective Plan Area of Bearing Aeff in mm 2 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184 183184
350 Height of Total Elastomer h in mm 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
351 Shore Hardness of the Rubber A 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Static Modulus of Elastomeric Bearing
352 MPa 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
as per UIC 772 2R
If any other value of G
G, Input Value of G
353 MPa 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
as per Tests
Shear Modulus of Bearing Considered in
354 Gs MPa 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
the Design
355 Factor for Dynamic Shear Modulus 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Shear Modulus of Elastomer for Seismic
356 Gd MPa 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13
Action
357
358 No of Bearings on Considered Pier 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
359
Force Considered for Stiffness
360 in kN 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Calculation
361 Force on Each Bearing in kN 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.67
362
Deflection of Bearing due to Applied
363 in mm 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Force
Deflection at Pier Cap Top due to
364 in mm 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Applied Force in Longitudinal Direction

Deflection at Pier Cap Top due to

365 in mm 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Applied Force in Transverse Direction
Total Deflection at Pier Cap Top due to
366 Applied Force & Bearing in Longitudinal in mm 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64
Di ti
Direction
Deflection at Pier Cap Top due to Applied
367 in mm 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66
Force & Bearing in Transverse Direction
368
369
370 Deflection at Pier Cap Top in mm 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
371
Stiffness in Long. Direction = The Load
372 in kN 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6
P for 0.1
0 1 cm Deflection,
Deflection PL
373
Stiffness in Tran. Direction = The Load
374 in kN 15.2 15.1 15.2 15.1 15.2 15.1 15.2 15.2 15.1 15.2
P for 0.1 cm Deflection, PL
375
Dead Load + Live Load in Longitudinal
376 in mton 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28 312.28
Direction, D
Dead Load + Live Load in Longitudinal
377 in kN 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8 3122 8
3122.8
Direction, D
378
Dead Load + Live Load in Transverse
379 in mton 353.95 395.61 387.95 395.61 333.11 353.95 350.11 333.11 353.95 350.11
Direction, D
Dead Load + Live Load in Transverse
380 in kN 3539.5 3956.1 3879.5 3956.1 3331.1 3539.5 3501.1 3331.1 3539.5 3501.1
Direction, D
381
e Period
Time e od in Longitudinal
o g tud a Direction,
ect o , TL
382 in
i SSec 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894 0.894
0 894
=
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
383
Time Period in Transverse Direction, TT
384 in Sec 0.965 1.022 1.012 1.022 0.937 0.967 0.961 0.937 0.967 0.961
=
385
386
387 Type of Soil at founding Level, N 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
388
389 Multiplication Factor of - Sa/g 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67
390 T in Sec 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
391 Sa/g 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
392 T in Sec 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.40
0 40 0.67
0 67
393 Sa/g 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
394 T in Sec 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.68
395 Sa/g 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.46
396 T in Sec 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
397 Sa/g 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.42
398
399
400 Sa/g in Longitudinal Direction 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 1.119 2.500
401 Sa/g in Transverse Direction 1.036 0.978 0.988 0.978 1.068 1.034 1.040 1.068 1.034 1.040 2.500
402
Importance Factor, I, Refer Table 7 of
403 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
IRC 6
404 Zone Factor 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240 0.240
405
406 Damping % 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

407 Type of Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure RCC Structure

408 Multiplication Factor due to Damping 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
Response Reduction Factor in Long
422 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Direction, R, As per Table 8 of IRC 6
Response Reduction Factor in Trans
423 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Direction, R, As per Table 8 of IRC 6
424
Mi i
Minimum S i i Coefficient
Seismic C ffi i t
425 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075
Considered in Design, Ah
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in
426 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.081 0.180
Longitudinal Direction, AhL
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient in
427 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.077 0.075 0.075 0.077 0.075 0.075 0.180
Transverse Direction, AhT
428
429 Ch k ffor B
Check Base P
Pressure
430
Length of Footing, (Longitudinal
431 L in m 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000 5.000
Direction)
Length of Footing, (Transverse
432 B in m 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000
Direction)
433 Base Area of Footing A in m 2 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000
Section of Modulus in Longitudinal 3
434 ZL in m 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000 25 000
25.000
Direction
Section of Modulus in Longitudinal
435 ZB in m 3 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30.000
Transverse
436
Direct Pressure Intensity for Maximum
437 P/A in mton/m 2 18.7 20.1 19.9 20.1 18.5 19.2 19.1 18.5 19.2 19.1 13.1
Load
Pressure Intensity due to Longitudinal
438 ML/ZL in mton/m 2 2.6 3.2 4.1 3.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 10.9 11.3 11.7 2.8
Moment
Pressure Intensity due to Transverse
439 MT/ZT in mton/m 2 6.9 8.9 9.2 8.9 12.8 14.2 14.2 3.4 4.5 4.6 0.0
Moment
440
2
441 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point A in mton/m 28.2 32.2 33.2 32.2 32.8 35.2 35.6 32.9 34.9 35.4 15.8
442 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point B in mton/m 2 14.4 14.4 14.8 14.4 7.2 6.8 7.1 26.0 26.0 26.2 15.8
443 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point C in mton/m 2 9.3 8.0 6.5 8.0 4.2 3.3 2.6 4.1 3.5 2.8 10.3
444 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point D in mton/m 2 23.0 25.8 25.0 25.8 29.9 31.7 31.1 11.0 12.4 12.0 10.3
445
Dsn By: KM Job No. 2019: Jammu Udhampur Bridges Doc No. TTS/2019/DN/105, R0
Chk By: SP Date: Oct 2011

Transverse Transverse Transverse Longitudinal Longitudinal Longitudinal One Span

Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Normal Case Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Seismic Dislodged
Case Case Case Case Case Case Condition
Remarks on Live Load Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A Class A 70R Class A Class A 70R
Direct Pressure Intensity for Minimum
446 P/A in mton/m 2 18.7 20.1 19.9 20.1 17.4 18.0 17.9 17.4 18.0 17.9 13.1
Load
Pressure Intensity due to Longitudinal
447 ML/ZL in mton/m 2 2.6 3.2 4.1 3.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 10.9 11.3 11.7 2.8
Moment
Pressure Intensity due to Transverse
448 MT/ZT in mton/m 2 6.9 8.9 9.2 8.9 12.8 14.2 14.2 3.4 4.5 4.6 0.0
Moment
449
450 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point A in mton/m 2 28.2 32.2 33.2 32.2 31.6 34.0 34.4 31.7 33.7 34.2 15.8
451 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point B in mton/m 2 14.4 14.4 14.8 14.4 6.0 5.6 5.9 24.9 24.8 25.0 15.8
2
452 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point C in mton/m 9.3 8.0 6.5 8.0 3.1 2.1 1.4 3.0 2.3 1.6 10.3
2
453 Gross Resultant Pressure at Point D in mton/m 23.0 25.8 25.0 25.8 28.7 30.4 29.9 9.8 11.2 10.8 10.3
454
455 Maximum Gross Pressure Developed in mton/m 2 28.2 32.2 33.2 32.2 32.8 35.2 35.6 32.9 34.9 35.4 15.8

456 Minimum Gross Pressure Developed in mton/m 2 9.3 8.0 6.5 8.0 3.1 2.1 1.4 3.0 2.3 1.6 10.3
457
Allowable Safe Bearing Capacity under 2
458 in mton/m 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Normal Condition
459 Depth of Footing Below Lowest OGL in m 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
460 Density of Soil in mton/m 3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
461
462 Factor for Increase in Bearing Capacity 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
463 Gross Safe Bearing Capacity in mton/m 2 39.5 39.5 39.5 39.5 48.3 48.3 48.3 48.3 48.3 48.3 48.3
464
465 Status Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay Okay