Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
12, 2009
Farouk O. Hamdoon*
Received on: 26/11/2008
Accepted on : 2 /4 /2009
Abstract
ANSYS has no module to analyze dynamics of rotor-bearing systems,
especially to calculate critical speeds. But it has element types, such as beam element
and matrix27 element, which can be modeled as stiffness, damping and mass matrix.
In this paper, BEAM4 element and MATRIX27 element are adopted to model the
shaft, rotating disks and bearings. Some ideas are presented to deal with critical speeds
calculation using ANSYS. The accuracy of the model and the solution technique have
been demonstrated by comparison with results of previous publications. Very good
agreement has been obtained.
ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺼﺔ
– ( ﻭﺤﺩﻩ ﺒﺭﻤﺠﻴﻪ ﻨﺴﻘﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻻﻫﺘﺯﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﻅـﺎﻡ ﻋﻤـﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺭANSYS ) ﻻ ﻴﻤﺘﻠﻙ ﺒﺭﻨﺎﻤﺞ
(BEAM4 ) ﺘﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻋﻨـﺼﺭ. ﻜﺭﺴﻲ ﺘﺤﻤﻴل ﻭﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻟﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﺤﺭﺠﺔ
( ﻓﻲ ﺘﻤﺜﻴل ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﻗـﺭﺍﺹANSYS) ( ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺒﺭﻨﺎﻤﺞMATRIX27) ﻭﻋﻨﺼﺭ
ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻜﺭﺍﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤﻴل ﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﺭﻴﺎﻀﻲ ﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻻﻫﺘﺯﺍﺯ ﻷﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺭ – ﻜﺭﺴﻲ
ﻜﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺘﻡ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻟﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﺤﺭﺠﺔ ﻟﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻻﻨﻅﻤﻪ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺒﺭﻨـﺎﻤﺞ, ﺘﺤﻤﻴل
ﻭﻟﻠﺘﺄﻜﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺭﻴﺎﻀﻲ ﻭﺼﺤﺔ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺤل ﻓﻘﺩ ﺘﻡ ﻋﻤل ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﻪ ﻤـﻊ ﻨﺘـﺎﺌﺞ.(ANSYS )
. ﻭﻟﻘﺩ ﺃﻅﻬﺭﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺘﻁﺎﺒﻘﺎ ﺠﻴﺩﺍ ﺠﺩﺍ.ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺓ ﻤﺴﺒﻘﺎ
2269
condition is introduced, and the rotating modulus 2.078 * 1011 N / m2 were used
speed is called critical speed. for the distributed rotor and a
The Modal Analysis module of concentrated disk with a mass of 1.401
ANSYS is applied to calculate all
kg , polar inertia 0.002kg.m2 and
natural frequencies of the rotor-bearing
system with different rotating speeds, diametral inertia 0.00136kg .m 2 was
and then a Campbell diagram is located at station five. The distributed
obtained as figure (1) shows. It is easy rotor was modeled as eighteen elements
to locate the critical speeds of the shown in figure(3).The data of these
system. When the BW frequency elements is listed in Table(1). Two
(backward precession) or the FW identical bearings, idealized as
frequency (forward precession) equal undamped and linear ,were located at
the spin speed Ω, indicated by the stations eleven and fifteen. The
intersections A and B with the following two cases of bearing stiffness
synchronous spin speed line, the were analyzed:
response of the rotor may show a peak. 4.1case(A) Isotropic Bearings
This represents a critical speed. The shaft is supported by
3.2 Synchronous Response Method identical bearings with the following
In general, any rotating critical data:
speed is associated with high vibration k yy = k zz = 4 . 378 * 10 7 N / m
amplitude. When the rotating speed is
close to or away from a critical speed, k yz = k zy = 0
vibration amplitude increases or An analysis was performed to
decreases abruptly and phase becomes determine the whirl frequencies, the
unsteady as figure (2) shows. For results are compared to that published
rotating machinery, rotor unbalance by Nelson et al[5] for a rotating speed
mass is a kind of synchronous 70000 rpm in Table(2).Very Good
excitation, and induces vibration. agreement is obtained. This close
The Harmonic Response agreement demonstrates the accuracy
Analysis module of ANSYS is applied of the model for calculating the
to calculate unbalance synchronous eignvalues.
response of the rotor-bearing system, 4.2case(B) Orthotropic Bearings
and a Bode plot can be obtained .From The undamped whirl speeds
the Bode plot, rotating speeds with peak were computed for several rotating
vibration are defined as critical speeds. speeds for the shaft supported by
4. Numerical Examples bearings with the following data:
In order to illustrate the
application and the accuracy of finite k yy = k zz = 3.503 * 10 7 N / m
element model, a typical rotor –bearing k yz = k zy = −8.756 * 10 6 N / m
system which was first used by Nelson
et al [5] is analyzed to determine its The numerical results of the first three
whirl speeds and unbalance response. A whirl speeds are well compared to
those published by [5]. Very good
density of 7806 kg / m3 and elastic agreement is obtained as shown in
2270
figure(4) which represents whirl speeds elements types and options, ANSYS is
map for finding critical speeds. also a powerful tool of rotating
The unbalance response for a disk machinery vibration analysis.
mass center eccentricity of 0.0635cm References
at station five was also determined [1]ANSYS 10.0 help document.
for speed range 0-30000 rpm and [2]Maurice,L.A,ROTATING
is plotted in Fig.(5). The first critical MACHINERY VIBRATION, Marcel
speed is found around 235 Hz ,while Dekker,2001.
the second is approximately 275 Hz [3]Rao, J. S., ROTOR DYNAMICS,
which are identical to those obtained New Age International (p) LTD,1996.
from the whirl speeds map. This can [4]Erik S. et al “A Practical Review of
also be another verification for the Rotating Machinery Critical Speeds
validity of the model and the and Modes” Journal of Sound and
technique presented in this paper to Vibration, May 2005.
calculate critical speeds using www.sandv.com
ANSYS. [5]Nelson, H.D. et al ”The Dynamics
5.Conclusions of Rotor Bearing System Using Finite
A finite element model of Elements” ” ASME Journal of
multi bearing rotor system using Engineering
ANSYS is presented. The effects of For Industry Vol.98,No.2,PP.593-
rotary inertia ,gyroscopic moments, 600,1976.
internal viscous and hysteretic
damping, and shear deformation can be
included. The characteristic of the fluid
film bearing can be represented by
eight stiffness and damping
coefficients. Some ideas are presented
to determine forward and backward
whirl speeds, critical speeds and
unbalance response of rotor-bearing
systems. The accuracy of the model
and the technique have been
demonstrated by comparison with the
results of previous publications. The
results obtained from comparison
showed that by defining proper
2271
Element Node Node Location Bearing Inner Diameter (cm) Outer Diameter
No. (cm) & disk (cm)
Table (2) Whirl Speeds (rpm) for Case (A) at Rotating Speed of 70000 rpm.
Mode No. Ref.[5] Present Work Ratio
1BW 12815 12904.343 1.006
1FW 19838 19705.265 0.993
2BW 45599 45666.437 1.001
2FW 50555 50620.981 1.001
3BW 63990 64623.893 1.009
3FW 91320 91421.884 1.001
2272
0
Phase (deg)
Amplitude
90
180
ΩC ΩC
Fig.(2) Synchronous Response Diagram.
2273
2274
1800
Synchronous
Present Work
1600
3FW Ref.[5]
1400
1200
Whirl Speeds [Hz]
1000
3BW
800 2FW
2BW
600
400
275 HZ 1FW
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Frequency of Rotating Speeds [Hz]
2275
(x10**-3)
5
4.5
3.5
Y-Amplitude [m]
2.5
1.5
.5
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
50 150 250 350 450
Frequency of Rotating Speed [Hz]
2276