Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
C1: Astrophysics
Author:
Fran Buist
2 Content Section 12
2.1 Subsection 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.1.1 Subsubsection 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.1.2 Subsubsection 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1.3 Subsubsection 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3 Conclusion 15
1
1 Liddle
An Introduction to Modern Cosmology
1.1 Observations
1. Visible light
(a) Stars - Visible light from nuclear fusion within stars, e.g the Sun
(b) Galaxies - For example, the Milky way contains about 1011 stars, rang-
ing in size from one tenth of a solar mass to around ten solar masses.
We are located about 8 kpc from the centre of the disk. Our Galaxy is
surrounded by globular clusters of stars each containing a million or so
stars.
In general we can consider a distant galaxy as a point like object emit-
ting light.
(c) Large Scale Smoothness - On scales of hundreds of megaparsecs or
more the Universe appears smooth. This smoothness of the universe is
a key principle of modern cosmology.
2. Other wavebands
2
3. Homogeneity and Isotropy
One does not automatically imply the other, but if we enforce that the
Universe is isotropic at every point, that does also enforce homogeneity. In
reality, since the cosmological principle of an entirely smooth universe is not
exact, the Universe is not entirely homogeneous and isotropic. However, it
is a reasonable approximation that makes calculations a whole lot easier!
~v = H0~r
3
relativistically or not, so by expanding the energy-momentum invariant from
Special Relativity we come to
1 p2
Etotal ≈ mc2 + .
2m
If the momentum is such that the second term dominates the particle must be
travelling at close to the speed of light, so must be considered relativistically!
We can now look at some types of fundamental particles:
Baryons
In the present universe Baryons are typically moving non-relativistically,
with typical mass energies of around 938 MeV, since the only stable
baryons are protons and neutrons.
Radiation
Elecrtomagnetic radiation is made up of photons (indicated by the sym-
bol γ ) which propagate at the speed of light and have zero rest mass.
High energy photons can ionize atoms, scatter off free electrons and
have many other effects on other particles.
4
In this spectrum the occupation number per mode N is given by the Planck
function
1
N = .
exp(hf /kB T ) − 1
8πh f 3 df
(f ) df = ,
c3 exp(hf /kB T ) − 1
4πGρrm
F =
3
and gravitational potential energy
4πGρr2 m
V =− .
3
1
To use energy conservation we now find the kinetic energy T = 2
mṙ2 and use
U = T + V to give us
5
1 4
U = mṙ2 − πGρr2 m. (1)
2 3
The next step is to realise that, since the Universe is homogeneous, we may
change to comoving coordinates, i.e. coordinates which are carried along with the
expansion of the Universe. For uniform expansion we may write this transforma-
tions as
~r = a(t)~x,
where a(t) is the scale factor of the Universe.
Plugging this into equation (1) we find
1 4π
U = mȧ2 x2 − Gρa2 x2 m.
2 3
Multipling this by 2/ma2 x2 and rearranging gives us
2
ȧ 8πG kc2
= ρ− 2 . (2)
a 3 a
2 2
where kc = −2U/mx . This is the Friedmann equation.
In order to use the Friedmann equation we need to know the density ρ as a funtion
of time of material in the Universe. We can use the fluid equation, derived below,
which relates pressure and density.
We start from the first law of thermodynamics
dE + p dV = T dS (3)
We can also use the Friedmann and fluid equations to derive a third equation
which gives the acceleration of the scale factor. First, differentiate equation (2)
with respect to time to get
1.3 Geometry
It’s time to look more closely at the constant k which appears in the Freidmann
equation! We have already chosen to look at a model for the universe which is
both homogeneous and isotropic, and the simplest geometry which satisfies these
conditions is a flat geometry, but it is not the only possibility!
7
1.3.1 Flat geometry
Things are lovely and simple in a geometrically flat worlds where we can use
euclidian geometry as normal. If flat geometry does apply to our universe then
the universe must be infinite so that homogeneity is not violated at the edge! In
a flat geometry k = 0.
This is the simplest non-euclidean geometry, the surface of a sphere, much like the
earth! (Worth remembering, here, that we are talking about a 3-dimensional space,
which we are modelling as a 2-dimensional surface.) A geometrically spherical
universe has a finite size but no boundary, and has a positive value for k. This
scenario is called a closed universe
This geometry is normally represented by a saddle-like surface and, like the flat
case, must be infinite. In this geometry k < 0 and we call this an open universe.
We have encountered Hubble’s law above, and the Friedmann equation lets us see
why it is that, as Hubble discovered, recession velocity is proportional to distance:
|~r˙ | ȧ
~v = ~r = ~r
|~r| a
where we have used ~r = a~x. From this we can see that the Hubble parameter
H = ȧ/a, and the value of this parameter today we label H0 . This allows us to
rewrite the Friedmann equation as
8πG k
H2 = ρ − 2.
3 a
8
1.4.2 Expansion and Redshift
We can relate the redshift of spectal lines to the scale factor as well! We start by
assuming light is transferred between two objects that are separated by a small
distance dr, therefore their relative velocity dv is
ȧ
dv = H dr = dr.
a
The Doppler law gives us that dλ ≡ λr − λe so
dλ dv
= ,
λe c
and by using the fact that light travel time dt = dv/c we reach
dλ ȧ dr ȧ da
= = dt = .
λe a c a a
By integrating this we find that ln λ = ln a + constant, i.e. λ is proportional to
the scale factor. This tells us that if, for example, the wavelength has doubled,
the Universe must have been half its present size when the light was emitted!
a(tr )
1+z =
a(te )
We now solve the Friedmann and fluid equations for 2 possible situations, a Uni-
verse filled with matter and a Universe filled with radiation. We look at both
scenarios in the case of a flat Universe.
Matter
Cosmologists use the term ‘matter’ to refer to non-relativistic material that
exerts negligible pressure, such that we can assume p = 0. This means we
can write the fluid equation as follows:
ȧ 1 d d
ρ̇ + 3 ρ = 0 =⇒ 3 (ρa3 ) = 0 =⇒ (ρa3 ) = 0.
a a dt dt
Integrating this tells us that
1 ρ0
ρ∝ , so we can write ρ =
a3 a3
9
where ρ0 is the density today. Substituting for ρ in the Friedmann equation
with k = 0 gives us
8πGρ0 1
ȧ2 = .
3 a
The best way to solve this is probably to know roughly what you’re looking
for (a power law probably) and substitute in this educated guess. Substitut-
ing in a ∝ tq and working through shows that the only possible solution is
a ∝ t2/3 . Hooray! We’ve solved it!
ρ0 t20
2/3
t ρ0
a(t) = ; ρ(t) = =
t0 a3 t2
ȧ 2
H≡ =
a 3t
Radiation
Particles moving at the speed of light have kinetic energy which leads to a
pressure force that can be shown to be p = ρc/3. As such the fluid equation
can be written
ȧ
ρ̇ + 4 ρ = 0.
a
Using the same trick as above we get to
1
ρ∝
a4
so we can easily reach
ρ0 t20
1/2
t ρ0
a(t) = ; ρ(t) = =
t0 a4 t2
10
So, we expect particle number to be conserved, so the only thing that does change
is the number density, which decreases as the volume gets bigger. As such, we
have
1
n ∝ 3.
a
Good News! This matches what we expect from looking at our previous results
for a matter dominated universe.
11
Figure 2: Three possible evolutions for the Universe, for different values of the
curvature constant k
2 Content Section
Fusce mauris. Vestibulum luctus nibh at lectus. Sed bibendum, nulla a fau-
cibus semper, leo velit ultricies tellus, ac venenatis arcu wisi vel nisl. Vestibu-
lum diam. Aliquam pellentesque, augue quis sagittis posuere, turpis lacus congue
quam, in hendrerit risus eros eget felis. Maecenas eget erat in sapien mattis port-
titor. Vestibulum porttitor. Nulla facilisi. Sed a turpis eu lacus commodo facilisis.
Morbi fringilla, wisi in dignissim interdum, justo lectus sagittis dui, et vehicula
libero dui cursus dui. Mauris tempor ligula sed lacus. Duis cursus enim ut augue.
Cras ac magna. Cras nulla. Nulla egestas. Curabitur a leo. Quisque egestas wisi
eget nunc. Nam feugiat lacus vel est. Curabitur consectetuer.
2.1 Subsection 1
2.1.1 Subsubsection 1
Suspendisse vel felis. Ut lorem lorem, interdum eu, tincidunt sit amet, laoreet
vitae, arcu. Aenean faucibus pede eu ante. Praesent enim elit, rutrum at, molestie
non, nonummy vel, nisl. Ut lectus eros, malesuada sit amet, fermentum eu, sodales
12
cursus, magna. Donec eu purus. Quisque vehicula, urna sed ultricies auctor, pede
lorem egestas dui, et convallis elit erat sed nulla. Donec luctus. Curabitur et nunc.
Aliquam dolor odio, commodo pretium, ultricies non, pharetra in, velit. Integer
arcu est, nonummy in, fermentum faucibus, egestas vel, odio.
2.1.2 Subsubsection 2
Suspendisse vel felis. Ut lorem lorem, interdum eu, tincidunt sit amet, laoreet
vitae, arcu. Aenean faucibus pede eu ante. Praesent enim elit, rutrum at, molestie
non, nonummy vel, nisl. Ut lectus eros, malesuada sit amet, fermentum eu, sodales
cursus, magna. Donec eu purus. Quisque vehicula, urna sed ultricies auctor, pede
lorem egestas dui, et convallis elit erat sed nulla. Donec luctus. Curabitur et nunc.
Aliquam dolor odio, commodo pretium, ultricies non, pharetra in, velit. Integer
arcu est, nonummy in, fermentum faucibus, egestas vel, odio.
Sed commodo posuere pede. Mauris ut est.
Ut quis purus. Sed ac odio. Sed vehicula hen-
drerit sem. Duis non odio. Morbi ut dui. Sed
accumsan risus eget odio. In hac habitasse
platea dictumst. Pellentesque non elit. Fusce
sed justo eu urna porta tincidunt. Mauris fe-
lis odio, sollicitudin sed, volutpat a, ornare ac,
erat. Morbi quis dolor. Donec pellentesque,
erat ac sagittis semper, nunc dui lobortis pu-
rus, quis congue purus metus ultricies tellus.
Figure 3: Fish Proin et quam. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad
litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos
hymenaeos. Praesent sapien turpis, fermentum vel, eleifend faucibus, vehicula eu,
lacus.
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac
turpis egestas. Donec odio elit, dictum in, hendrerit sit amet, egestas sed, leo.
Praesent feugiat sapien aliquet odio. Integer vitae justo. Aliquam vestibulum
fringilla lorem. Sed neque lectus, consectetuer at, consectetuer sed, eleifend ac,
lectus. Nulla facilisi. Pellentesque eget lectus. Proin eu metus. Sed porttitor. In
hac habitasse platea dictumst. Suspendisse eu lectus. Ut mi mi, lacinia sit amet,
13
placerat et, mollis vitae, dui. Sed ante tellus, tristique ut, iaculis eu, malesuada
ac, dui. Mauris nibh leo, facilisis non, adipiscing quis, ultrices a, dui.
2.1.3 Subsubsection 3
First
Morbi luctus, wisi viverra faucibus pretium, nibh est placerat odio, nec com-
modo wisi enim eget quam. Quisque libero justo, consectetuer a, feugiat
vitae, porttitor eu, libero. Suspendisse sed mauris vitae elit sollicitudin male-
suada. Maecenas ultricies eros sit amet ante. Ut venenatis velit. Maecenas
sed mi eget dui varius euismod. Phasellus aliquet volutpat odio. Vestibulum
ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae;
Pellentesque sit amet pede ac sem eleifend consectetuer. Nullam elemen-
tum, urna vel imperdiet sodales, elit ipsum pharetra ligula, ac pretium ante
justo a nulla. Curabitur tristique arcu eu metus. Vestibulum lectus. Proin
mauris. Proin eu nunc eu urna hendrerit faucibus. Aliquam auctor, pede
consequat laoreet varius, eros tellus scelerisque quam, pellentesque hendrerit
ipsum dolor sed augue. Nulla nec lacus.
Second
Suspendisse vitae elit. Aliquam arcu neque, ornare in, ullamcorper quis,
commodo eu, libero. Fusce sagittis erat at erat tristique mollis. Maecenas
sapien libero, molestie et, lobortis in, sodales eget, dui. Morbi ultrices rutrum
lorem. Nam elementum ullamcorper leo. Morbi dui. Aliquam sagittis. Nunc
placerat. Pellentesque tristique sodales est. Maecenas imperdiet lacinia velit.
Cras non urna. Morbi eros pede, suscipit ac, varius vel, egestas non, eros.
Praesent malesuada, diam id pretium elementum, eros sem dictum tortor,
vel consectetuer odio sem sed wisi.
Third
Sed feugiat. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes,
nascetur ridiculus mus. Ut pellentesque augue sed urna. Vestibulum diam
eros, fringilla et, consectetuer eu, nonummy id, sapien. Nullam at lectus.
In sagittis ultrices mauris. Curabitur malesuada erat sit amet massa. Fusce
blandit. Aliquam erat volutpat. Aliquam euismod. Aenean vel lectus. Nunc
imperdiet justo nec dolor.
14
3 Conclusion
Etiam euismod. Fusce facilisis lacinia dui. Suspendisse potenti. In mi erat, cursus
id, nonummy sed, ullamcorper eget, sapien. Praesent pretium, magna in eleifend
egestas, pede pede pretium lorem, quis consectetuer tortor sapien facilisis magna.
Mauris quis magna varius nulla scelerisque imperdiet. Aliquam non quam. Ali-
quam porttitor quam a lacus. Praesent vel arcu ut tortor cursus volutpat. In vitae
pede quis diam bibendum placerat. Fusce elementum convallis neque. Sed dolor
orci, scelerisque ac, dapibus nec, ultricies ut, mi. Duis nec dui quis leo sagittis
commodo.
Aliquam lectus. Vivamus leo. Quisque ornare tellus ullamcorper nulla. Mauris
porttitor pharetra tortor. Sed fringilla justo sed mauris. Mauris tellus. Sed non
leo. Nullam elementum, magna in cursus sodales, augue est scelerisque sapien,
venenatis congue nulla arcu et pede. Ut suscipit enim vel sapien. Donec congue.
Maecenas urna mi, suscipit in, placerat ut, vestibulum ut, massa. Fusce ultrices
nulla et nisl.
References
[Figueredo and Wolf, 2009] Figueredo, A. J. and Wolf, P. S. A. (2009). Assortative
pairing and life history strategy - a cross-cultural study. Human Nature,
20:317–330.
15