Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 40
JOURNAL ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY 1917 XI THE ACT OF TRUTH (SACCAKIRIYA): A HINDU SPELL AND ITS EMPLOYMENT AS A PSYCHIC MOTIF IN HINDU FICTION' By EUGENE WATSON BURLINGAME, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. N Act of Truth is a formal declaration of fact, accompanied by a command or resolution or prayer that the purpose of the agent shall be accomplished.? For example, a hunter asks o sage how a certain nymph can be captured, and the sage replies: “Nymphs can be captured by the utterance of a truth; nor, under such circumstances, have they power to vanish from sight.” Accordingly the hunter says to the nymph he desires to capture: “You are the beautiful daughter of King ' ‘This paper is intended to form a chapter in Professor Maurice Bloomficld’s projected Cyclopwdia of Hindu Fiction Motifs. See the following papers by Bloomfield: ‘On Recurring Psychic Motifs in Hindu Fiction, and the Laugh and Cry Motif,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, xxxvi, 54-89. ‘On Talking Birds in Hindu Fiction,” Festschrift fiir lernst Windisch, 349-61. ‘' The Character and Adventures of Malndova,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, lii, 616-50. 2 Compare 2 Kings, i, 10-12: ‘And Elijah answered and said to the captain of fifty, If Ibo a man of God, then let fire come down from heaven and consume thee and thy fifty. And there came down fire from heaven, and consumed him and his fifty.” gras, 1917, 23 430 THE ACT OF TRUTH Druma; if this be true, halt! you are bound fast! If it be true that you are the daughter of King Druma, and that you were reared by the king, move not a foot, O fair Manohari!” By the utterance of this truth on the part of the hunter the nymph addressed is immediately bound fast, and is unable to vanish from sight; but all of her companions vanish into the air Or take the story of the restoration of King Sivi’s eyes by an Act of Truth. Sivi, who is already noted for his generosity, one day makes « vow that should any one beg of him, not something outside of him, but part of his very self, whether heart, flesh, blood, or eyes, he will give it to him. Sakka hears his vow, disguises himself as a blind beggar, and asks him for one of his eyes. Sivi forthwith gives him both, Afterwards, becoming depressed, he longs for death. Sakka tells him to make an Act of Truth with reference to his gift, assuring him that, if he will do so, his eyes will be restored. Sivi therenpon makes the following Act of ‘Truth: “ Whatso- ever sort or kind of beggar comes to me is dear to my heart. If this be true, let one of my eyes be restored.” Immediately one of his eyes is restored. ‘To restore the other eye, he recites the following: “A Brahman came to me and asked me for one of my eyes; unto him gave Itwo, Great joy and delight filled me. If this be true, let my other eye be restored.” Immediately his other eye is restored. The story goes on to say that Sivi's new eyes were neither natural eyes nor divine eyes, inasmuch as an eye given by Sakka cannot be made a natural eye, nor can a divine eye be produced when the physical basis or cause has been injured; that they are to be described as the Eyes of the Perfection of ‘Truth? * Mahdvastu, ti, 97°". 2 Jataka 499. In Jataka-mild, ii, Sivi's eyes were restored by the power of his Trath-Command and hy the abundant store of his merit, satyidhisht{hinabalit punyopacayaviceshac ca. THE ACY OF TRUTH 431 A single truth is sufficient; and, as in the examples cited, a truth of the most commonplace sort. As a rule the Act of Truth refers to some such fact as that the agent, or the person in whose behalf the Act is performed, possesses certain good qualities or is free from certain evil qualities; that he has done certain things he ought to have done, or that he has left undone certain things he ought not to do, For example, reference is frequently nade to the truth of some teaching of the Buddha, or of his religion as a whole ; to religious devotion; to absence of hatred or malice; to the fact that a person has never deliberately injured a living being; and, by women, to the fact of their chastity. But while the person who performs the Act, or the beneficiary thereof, is generally represented as a paragon of virtue, and the reference is usually to religious truth or good works or merit, this is not invariably the case. A courtezan, provided she has at her command a single truth, thereby possesses power equal to that of the greatest saint. The Act of Truth sometimes refers, not - to good qualities or good works, but to the very opposite. For example, an ascetic performs an Act of Truth with reference to his dissatisfaction with the religious life ; a father, with reference to his lack of religious devotion ; and a wife, with reference to her utter hatred of her husband. Adulterous wives deceive their husbands by mock Acts of Truth; wicked ministers deceive their king. Not only are all the deities and powers of nature compelled to obey the command accompanying an Act of Truth when the persons involved are of blameless character and their motives the highest ; they are equally under compulsion to obey, however much against their will, the command that accompanies an Act performed for the express purpose of accomplishing deception or perpetrating a fraud ! In connection with the Power of ‘Truth are sometimes 432 THE ACT OF TRUTH mentioned Powers of Righteousness, such as the power of goodness and the power of merit; and, as well, the superhuman might of spirits, deities, and Buddhas. Such mention does not mean, however, that the Act of Truth in any way depends for its efficacy upon the co-operation of these other forces, powerful though they are. Truth, in and by itself all-powerful and irresistible, is essentially distinct from them, and operates independently of them. Truth, to the exclusion of any ordinary physical power or cause, is the sole power whereby the conjurer causes rain to fall, fire to turn back, poison to be struck down. There is nothing that cannot be accomplished by the Truth. Men, gods, powers of nature; all animate and inanimate things alike obey the Truth. Even the Buddhas themselves employ Acts of ‘Truth. ‘The Act of Truth commonly takes the form of a spell or charm, most often that of a healing charm. It is frequently employed in prayers addressed to good and evil spirits, deities, and the powers of nature. It is also employed in pronouncing curses and taking oaths, and is the means par excellence of avoiding injury or death in ordeals, As is shown by the specimens given helow, it is-the stock in trade by which men play, one after another, the parts of wizard, conjurer, magician, physician, surgeon, good Samaritan, rain-maker, prophet, and priest. The Act of Truth, although frequently 1 humdrum charm, and usually very simple, is always a formal act. Sometimes, especially in the Buddhist and Jain records, it takes on the character of a quasi-sacramental rite, and is performed with scrupulous attention to preliminary details and accompanying ceremonies. For example, a@ woman, about to transform herself into a man, invokes the deities as witnesses. A tiny quail, before conjuring a forest fire to turn back, engages in solemn meditation on the Buddhas and their acquired powers.. A king and 1 See especially Milindapaitha, 119-23 (translated below). THE ACT OF TRUTH 433 queen, intending to cross rivers on dry foot, meditate on the virtues of the Buddha, the Law, and the Order. A queen, intending to cross a river on dry foot, goes to the bank of the river with her retinue in ceremonial attire, and, first invoking the goddess of the river, with hands both joined, and with a pure heart, pronounces the magic words. A king drives in his chariot of state to charm the ocean. A monkey, intending to hollow canes, blows into them, A woman sprinkles water on the head of her husband in curing him of leprosy. A prince, in healing wounds in the hands, rubs the palms with powdered bark. In counteracting the effect of poison the laying on of hands is regularly employed. A woman, about to undergo the ordeal of passing between the legs of a yaksha, before making her Act of ‘Truth, bathes, puts on fresh garments, and offers incense and flowers to the yaksha, A skipper, before making an Act of ‘Truth to avert shipwreck, orders his fellow-mariners to bathe him in perfumed water, clothe him in new garments, prepare him a full bowl, and place him in the bow of the ship, He performs his Act standing in the bow of the ship, and holding the full bowl in both his hands. Similarly a conjurer, who is able by means of the Vedabbha charm to cause the seven kinds of jewels to come down from the sky like rain, before reciting the charm has his head bathed, is clothed with new garments, perfumed with scents, and decked with flowers. The Pali word for “ Act of Truth” is saceakiriyd. ‘Lhe phonetic equivalent in Sanskrit is *satyakriyd, and this form is given by Béhtlingk-Roth, but without references. LT have nowhere inet with this form in Sanskrit, and am of the opinion that it does not occur. The word kiriya, kriya is used, both in Pali and Sanskrit, to denote any kind of act, operation, or performance, and frequently, as Y See Jataka 48. 434 THE ACT OF TRUTH in the compound saccakiriyd, has a distinct: flavour of magie about it, Instead of *satyakriyd, the Sanskr employs sutyddhish{hanarn, “ Truth-Command.” The Pi equivalent saccddhitthénar occurs, but not often! The spell is sometimes referred to as a “Truth-Utterance” Pali saceavajja, Sanskrit satyavidya; Pali saceavacana, Sanskrit satyavacana ; Sanskrit satyopavacana;? satya- vakya, satyagravand.s Sometimes it is called simply a'Trath”: Pali saccari, Sanskrit satyarir. The formula used varies considerably. Common examples in Pali are: yena saccena ... etena sacca- vajjena;4 tathd ... yathd ... etena saccavajjena ;> yasméé .. . elena saccenw;® sauce... imind saccena ;7 elena succena;® imind saccena;°® ctena saccavajjend ;'° mama saccena." In Sanskrit: yena satyena satyu- vacanena ... tena satyena satyavacanena;? anenw salyena satyavakyena;" elena satyavakyena ; anenw satyandkyena 3 yatha . . . satyavacanena;'® yatha .. . anena satyena;™ yatha . . . etena satyena;® yadi .. . tat tena satyena; yathad .. . tathd;* atas: ‘The formal utterance of a truth under such circumstances and for such purposes as have been mentioned is in fact a magic art of the most primitive sort. ‘The fundamental concept underlying it is not peculiar to the Buddhists or to the Hindus, but is, and always has been, the common possession of all the races of mankind. It underlies not \ Thera.Gatha Commentary, cexxxv, Jataka 20: i, 172°", 2 Avaddna-Cataka, i, 48°. 3 Pargvandtha-caritra, iii, 267. 4 Jataka, vi, 91°5—%, 1542-9, 8 Thi 7» 2De—| 7 Ibid. v iv, 31M; ¥, 29'-9, ® Ibid. i, 294%, 331°, 142", 320'—18, 410! y, 87, 2427, 1 Dirydraddna, 472"-™, 473%—", 473, 6715-1, 5791", 13 Thid, 154%, 1554, 4 Mahavastu, ii, 97. 18 Jatuka-maté, xiv, 31. 4 Maharastu, ii, 97. 1 Jitaku-mald, xv, 8. ® Dirydvadana, & 19 hid 417% © Juttaka-matd, iy 30-1. Yhid. xvi, 7. THE ACT OF TRUTH 435 only many of the cruder folk-practices, such as witchcraft, but also many of the more highly refined and civilized forms of prayer and oath and curse. It is o striking and significant expression in symbolic terms of the deep- seated conviction of all men everywhere that the truth is of supreme importance and of irresistible power. It explains why the oath and the curse have always struck terror to the human heart. In all ages and climes witnesses, before bearing testimony, have invoked deities and powers of nature to punish them if their words were falae, firm in the conviction that so high is the dignity of truth and so tremendous its power that not only mankind but superhuman powers as well are subject to it and compelled to obey it. Some such idea as this doubtless underlies the Jewish, Christian, and Mohammedan con- ception of the Deity as governed by and acting in accordance with the principle of truth, of God as Truth. The all-powerful character of Truth is brought out in a very striking and picturesque manner in the accounts of ordeals. ‘Truth protects the innocent, and falsehood destroys the guilty. ‘The innocent man is perfectly safe in taking a red-hot iron ball into his hands, and the innocent woman may with impunity step into the fire. A person accused of wrongdoing has but to utter the truth, and, if he be innocent, both deities and powers of nature will come to his assistance and vindicate his innocence. A famous passage in the Chandogya Upanishad (6, 16) employs an unusually bold figure. In this passage the guilty man is represented as identifying himself with falsehood, the innocent man as identifying himself with truth. “Again, my son, they lead along a man with hands bound. ‘He has stolen, he has committed theft; heat the axe for him!’ If he be guilty, then verily he makes himself to be falsehood (4tmanam. anrtarir karoti): com- pletely uniting himself with falsehood (anrtabhisaridho), 436 THE ACT OF TRUTH incorporating himself into falsehood (anrtendtmanarir antardhiya), he grasps the heated axe. He is burned; he perishes, But if he be innocent, then verily he makes himself to be truth (... satyari...): completely uniting himself with truth, incorporating himself into truth, he grasps the heated axe. He is not burned; he is freed ”,? : Interesting as is the Act of Truth regarded simply as a piece of magic, it is even more interesting as an instrument in the hands of the story-teller, It is one of the favourite themes of the Hindu story-teller, and many of the most interesting and entertaining stories in Hindu literature and folklore turn on it. Obviously, by reason of ‘its resourcefulness and the strong appeal it makes to the imagination, it possesses immense possibilities for the purposes of fiction. As a psychic motif, a literary device or ruse, a god from the machine, it is employed in the 1 The meaning of this famous passage is much disputed, and the interpretation here offered is radically different from all previous interpretations. The crux of the passage is the compound satyd- Uhisandha, which, in my opinion, should be translated in complete or perfect union with the truth, The second element, abhisandha, appears to bear the same relation to the noun sandhd qs abhisenbuddha to sambuddha, The passage is one of several illustrative figures employed by a father to teach his son the essential identity of all things with “the existent”, “the real”, “tho true”, tho sat. This all (idan sarvant) is one: the phenomenal world, men, animals, plants, trees ; all animate and inanimate things are an outward and visible manifestation, unfolding, diversification of “ the one”, ‘the existent”, the saf, All things spring from the saz, return to the sat, are merged in the sat, are the sat. ‘The meaning of the passage would, therefore, appear to be this: All visible things are identical with the oxistent, the eaf, just as in the ordeal the accused is identified with, identical with the trath, satya, or with its opposite. The play on words (sat, satya) and the fact that the two words are radically and semantically related seem to me to be highly significant. For the sake of greater emphasis and clearness the author of the passage, following a familiar practice of Hindu authors, employs three synonymous expressions, setting them side by side: makes himself to be truth, completely unites himself’ with truth, incorporates himself into (or with) truth, For other interpretations of the passage Seo tho translations of Bahtlingk, Deusson, and Max Miiller, and, more recently, Edgerton in JAOS. xxxv, 245 f. THE ACT OF TRUTH 437 greatest variety of ways and for all imaginable purposes. It is an ever present help in time of need, whether in sickness or in health, in any danger or difficulty or adversity; it is employed to prove facts and refute falsehoods, trained animals sometimes being introduced as witnesses ; to identify a man or a woman ; to cross rivers on dry foot, cause rivers to flow backwards, and roll back the ocean ; to put out fire; to effect change of sex or condition ; to capture nymphs and animals, and to give success in the hunt; and even for such a common-place purpose as to cut a gem in two. The locus classicus of the Act of Truth is one of the Dialogues of King Milinda and the Buddhist sage Nagasena.! This Dialogue, which attempts to explain on pseudo-scientific grounds the mode of operation of the Act of Truth, also reveals in a most striking manner its possibilities as an instrument in the hands of the story- teller. Milinda opens the discussion by attributing to Nagaseua and his followers the statement that the blind king Sivi received Heavenly Eyes, and inquires whether this statement is not inconsistent with the Scriptural statement that the Heavenly Eye cannot be produced when the physical cause has been destroyed. Nigasena replies that the power by which Sivi received Heavenly Eyes was the Power of Truth; that Truth alono, to the exclusion of any ordinary physical cause, was the cause of the production of the Heavenly Eye. “ But, your Majesty, is there such a thing in the world as Truth, by which truth-speakers perform an Act of Trath? Yes, reverend sir, there is in the world such a thing as Truth, By Truth, reverend Nagasena, truth- speakers perform an Act of ‘ruth, and by this means cause rain, extinguish fire, counteract poison, and do all manner of other things besides that have to be done. 1 Milindapaiiha, 119-23, 438 THE ACT OF TRUTH Well then, your Majesty, the two statements are perfectly consistent and harmonious. King Sivi received heavenly eyes by the Power of Truth: by the Power of ‘Truth, your Majesty, on no other basis, is the Heavenly Eye produced ; the Truth alone was in this case the basis for the production of the Heavenly Eye.” “The case was precisely the same, your Majesty, as © when accomplished persons recite » Truth, saying, ‘Let a mighty cloud send down rain’; and immediately upon their recitation of the Truth, a mighty cloud sends down rain, Your Majesty, is there stored up in the sky any cause of rain, by which the mighty cloud sends down rain? Of course not, reverend sir; the Truth alone is in this case the cause whereby the mighty cloud sends down rain, In precisely the same manner, your Majesty, no ordinary cause operated in the case in question; the Truth alone was in that case the basis for the production of the Heavenly Eye.” “It was precisely the same, your Majesty, as when accomplished persons recite a Truth, saying, ‘Let the mighty mass of flaring, flaming fire turn back’; and immediately upon their recitation of the Truth, the mighty mass of flaring, flaming fire turns back, ... It was precisely the same as when accomplished persons recite a Truth, saying, ‘Let the deadly poison become an antidote’; and immediately upon their recitation of the ‘Truth the deadly poison becomes an antidote. Your Majesty, is there stored up in this deadly poison any cause whereby it immediately becomes on antidote? Of course not, reverend sir; the ‘ruth alone is in this case the cause of the immediate counteraction of the deadly poison. In precisely the same manner, your Majesty, in the case of King Sivi, the ‘Truth alone, to the exclusion of any ordinary causé, was the basis for the production of the Heavenly Eye.” THE ACT OF TRUTH 439 Water Cuarms To roll back the Ocean “Your Majesty, in the land of China there is a king who, once every four months, desiring to make offering to the great ocean, performs an Act of Truth, and then proceeds in his chariot of state a league’s distance into the great ocean. Before the chariot of state the mighty mass of water rolls back, and, as he returns, it pours back again. Your Majesty, could that great ocean he made to roll back by the ordinary physical power even of gods and men combined? Reverend sir, even the water in a tiny pool could not be made to roll back by the ordinary physical power even of gods and men combined, much less the water in the great ocean, Your Majesty, by this example also you may understand the Power of Truth ; there is nothing you might name that cannot be accomplished by the Truth.” To cause a wiver to flow backwards “One day, your Majesty, the righteous king Asoka stood in the city of Pataliputta, surrounded by city folk and country folk, by his ministers and his army and his councillors, with the Ganges flowing by, filled up by freshets, even with the banks, full to the brim, five hundred leagues in Jength, a league in breadth. Beholding the river, he said to his ministers, ‘Is there any one who can make this mighty Ganges flow back upstream?’ The ministers replied, ‘That is a hard matter, your Majesty.’” “Now there stood on that very river bank a courtezan named Bindumati, and, when she heard the king’s question, she said, ‘As for me, I am a courtezan in the city of Pitaliputta. I live by my beauty; my means of sub- sistence is the lowest. Let the king but behold my Act of Truth.’ And she performed an Act of ‘ruth, The 440 THE ACT OF TRUTH instant she performed her Act of Truth that mighty Ganges flowed back upstream with a roar, in the sight of all that mighty throng.” “When the king heard the roar caused by the movement of the whirlpools and the waves of the mighty Ganges, he was astonished, and filled with wonder and amazement. Said he to his ministers, ‘ How comes it that this mighty Ganges is flowing back upstream?’ ‘Your Majesty, the courtezan Bindumati heard your words, and performed an Act of Truth, It is because of her Act of Truth that the mighty Ganges is flowing backwards.’” “His heart palpitating with excitement, the king himself went post-haste and asked the courtezan, ‘Is it true, as they say, that you, by an Act of Truth, have’ made this river Ganges flow back upstream?’ ‘ Yes, your Majesty.’ Said the king, ‘You have power to do such a thing as this! Who, indeed, unless he were stark mad, would pay any attention to what you say? By what power have you caused this mighty Ganges to flow back upstream ?’ Said the courtezan, ‘By the Power of Truth, your Majesty, have I caused this mighty Ganges to flow back upstream.’” “Said the king, ‘You possess the Power of Truth! You, a thief, a cheat, corrupt, cleft in twain, vicious, a wicked old sinner who have broken the bounds of morality and live on the plunder of fools’ ‘It is true, your Majesty; I am what you say. But even I, wicked woman that I am, podsess an Act of Truth by means of which, should I so desire, I could turn the world of men and the worlds of the gods upside down.’ Said the king, “But what is this Act of Truth? Pray enlighten me.’” “

Вам также может понравиться