Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

IndiaDivine.org Existing user?

Sign In   Sign Up

More  Search... 

Kunda, Nava-navamsa  Sign in to follow this  

and JHora
By Guest guest, August 29, 2005 in Vedic Astrology (Jyotisha)

Rate this topic


Start new topic Reply to this topic


Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report post 

Dear PVR,

I am Using JHora 7.02 Version. Let us take this Birth Data:

DOB: 1971 November 18.


Guests
Birth Time: 2.51 AM (IST)

(5.30 East of GMT)

Log: 77 E 00 Lat: 8 N 31 (Trivandrum, Kerala)

The longitudes I get are:

Lagna: 10 Vi 08 min 31.96 sec

Kunda: 11 Ar 45 min 26.98 sec

Now right-clicking in the Navamsa chart, I am choosing 'Higher

divisions ->Normal nana-navamsa (D-81)'. Again right-clicking, I check

to see whether 'Higher divisions ->Choose nava-navamsa->Parasara's

nava-navamsa' is selected. After this right-clicking on the longitudes

pane, I am choosing, 'Choose the divisional chart for longitudes'.

Act Now and


Then from the drop-down listdiscover
I chooseyour Personal Future
Predictions Based on your Date of Birth
From longitudes pane, for nava-navamsa longitude of lagna I get,
Learn more
Medium - Angela
15 Ar 21| 32.11||

Therefore, as per JHora,

Lagna: 10 Vi 08 min 31.96 sec

Kunda: 11 Ar 45 min 26.98 sec


Nava-navamsa (D-81-Lagna): 15 Ar 21 min 32.11 sec

Anybody can see that, here Kunda and Nava-navamsa are different.

As per de�nition,

Asc x 81 = Kunda = Nava-navamsa

Therefore there should be an error in it. Either in Kunda or

Nava-navamsa or in Both. We would try to �nd where it is?

Now let us calculate these values manually from the longitudes

of Lagna (Asc).

Lagna = Asc = 10 Vi 08 min 31.96 sec = 5 sign - 10 deg - 8 min -

31.96 sec.

(Using windows calculator I am calculating) First let us convert

longitude of Asc into seconds.


858.22 sec = 14 min 18.22 sec

OK. It is an acceptable value. Therefore I humbly take back my

words about the Kunda calculation of JHora software. It is more or

less accurate. (In Kunda calculation 14 min. is also important. I

would humbly ask is it your error or could it be mine?). Still it is

pretty clear that I have made an error in accusing PVR of making an

unacceptable error in Kunda calculation. I apologize.

The Navamsa-navamsa (D-81) calculated by JHora is nowhere near

this (15 Ar 21 min 32.11 sec). Clearly that gives an error value. PVR

has already said that he will �x it. I accept the explanation given

by PVR on this issue, and consider it as su�cient.

I would ask the JHora users to depend on Kunda sputa rather than

Nava-navamsa (D-81) given by JHora to make birth-time recti�cation.

(Even though by theory both of them are one and the same).

Thanks,

Sreenadh

 Quote

Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report post 

Namaste Sreenadh,

> DOB: 1971 November 18.> Birth Time: 2.51 AM (IST)> (5.30 East of
Guests GMT)>

Log: 77 E 00 Lat: 8 N 31 (Trivandrum, Kerala)

> Therefore, as per JHora,> Lagna: 10 Vi 08 min 31.96 sec> Kunda: 11


Ar 45

min 26.98 sec

> Manually calculating, Kunda : 11 Ar 31 min 8.76 sec.> By using JHora


we get :

11 Ar 45 min 26.98 sec.

> OK. It is an acceptable value. Therefore I humbly take back my >


words about

the Kunda calculation of JHora software. It is more or > less accurate.


(In

Kunda calculation 14 min. is also important. I > would humbly ask is it


your

error or could it be mine?). Still it is > pretty clear that I have made an

error in accusing PVR of making an > unacceptable error in Kunda


calculation. I

apologize.

Your apology is accepted.

However, when I enter this data in my computer, I get the same lagna
you do but

get Kunda at 11 Ar 31' 9.08". This is much closer to the manual


calculation you

gave. I wonder why you get 14 min error.

Usually, we have found in the past that one gets the same results out
of JHora

on different computers if there are no different JHora settings that


impact

that particular calculation.

And, there aren't any settings in JHora that in�uence Kunda. Kunda is
merely

81 times lagna. I am wondering if you made some mistake or used one


ayanamsa

when noting lagna and one ayanamsa when noting kunda or


something like that.

Please check once more.

BTW, is this your chart by any chance?

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

-------------------------------Free Jyotish

lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish


http://www.SriJagannath.org-------------------------------

 Quote

 Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

 Reply to this topic...

 GO TO TOPIC LISTING
Vedic Astrology (Jyotisha)

       
Free Personal Reading
Ad Medium - Angela

H
Hoow wT Too M Maakkee
C
Coorrrreecctt A Assttrroollooggiiccaall
P
Prreeddiiccttiioonnss??
indiadivine.org

PPrraayyoogg ffoorr ""H


HAAT
TTTH
HAA
JJO
OD DII""
indiadivine.org

m
maarriittaall ddiissccoorrdd
indiadivine.org

F
Foorreeiiggnn S
Seettttlleem
meenntt
indiadivine.org

R
Ree :: sseeccoonndd oorr tthhiirrdd
m
maarrrriiaaggee -- uurr ooppiinniioonn
indiadivine.org

CCaann aa m maann m
maarrrryy aann
oollddeerr w
woom
maann
indiadivine.org

GGeem mssttoonnee
rreeccoom
mm meennddaattiioonn ffoorr
SSccoorrppiioo A
Asscceennddaanntt
indiadivine.org

HHEELLP PP PLLE
EA ASSE E
cchheecckk m
myy kkuunnddaallii ffoorr
DDIIV
VO OR RCCEE??
indiadivine.org

SSaaddee ssaattii-- ccaallccuullaatteedd


ffrroom
mN Naattaall M Moooonn oorr
ffrroom
m LLaaggnnaa
indiadivine.org

SSrrii A
Aiirraavvaattaa:: LLoorrdd
IInnddrraa''ss D
Diivviinnee
VVaahhaannaa
indiadivine.org

Ad
11.. F
Frreeee M
Maarrrriiaaggee P
Prreeddiiccttiioonn
22.. A
Accccuurraattee A
Assttrroollooggyy H
Hoorroossccooppee
33.. A
Abboouutt A
Assttrroollooggyy B
Biirrtthh C
Chhaarrtt
Theme  Ask a Question
Powered by Invision Community

Вам также может понравиться