Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INJECTION MOLD
DESIGN
BDD 40903 Prepared by : Mohd Hilmi Othman 1
CHAPTER 6
Ejector Design(4 hours)
1. Ejector system design process
a) Identify mould parting surface
b) Estimate ejection force
c) Ejector push area and parameter
d) Type, number and size of ejector
e) Ejectors layout
2. Ejector system analyses and designs
a) Ejector pin
b) Ejector blade
c) Ejector sleeve
d) Ejector plate
What is the
different between
Inject and Eject?
Eject
Before After
1. Ejector plate, place for ejector and ejector guide bush, shoulder bolts and return pin.
2. Ejector Backing Plate, place for clamping the ejector and push back the ejector.
3. Return pin, push the ejector plate and ejector backing plate to first position.
4. Spring in return pin, to make sure and holds the ejector plate so it's always in back position, when in
assembling process, it can lift up the ejector pin, and ejector plate so the position always in back, give the
little preloads to ejector plate to make sure the ejector plate position.
5. Shoulder bolts, first time lock in assembling molds
6. Ejector pin, eject and push the product from core.
7. Ejector guide pin, guide the moving of ejector plate.
8. Ejector guide pin bush, to make sliding and prevent large contact when moving.
9. Support pillar, to prevent large deflection of core plate when injecting the plastic material process held.
10. Ejector rod, contact with rod in injection machine, this also passing force from injection machine to ejector
plate.
11. Ejector bolts, to tie up between ejector plate and ejector backing plate.
• The normal forces is estimated as the integral of the residual tensile stresses in the molded part taken
across the effective area of the molded part:
• Fnorma
• Unfortunately the estimation of the residual tensile stresses is a complex function of the processing
conditions, mold geometry and material properties. A detail treatment is well beyond the scope of this
course. For this reason, conservative simplifying assumptions are applied to provide an estimate of the
ejection force.
• The analysis assumes that the tensile stresses in the molding are the result of the thermal contraction
of the mold.
• This assumption will cause the analysis to over predict the ejection forces since in the practice of the
polymer:
• Maybe in a compressive state before the application of thermal shrinkage
• May tend to relax
• Since the polymer melt cannot support tensile stress in a fluid state the thermal strain is estimated for
the solidified plastic as the coefficient of thermal expansion of the plastic material (CTE), multiplied by the
difference between the solidification temperature, and the ejection temperature:
E=CTE,,,,
• While there will be stress relaxation as the polymer melt becomes rigid, a conservative assumption is that
the strain develops with the material at its room temperature modulus. The resulting tensile stress internal
to the part can then be computed as a constant throughout the entire molding is:
P-Ee…
• To estimate the normal and ejection forces, the cross section area upon which the stress effectively act must
be calculated. This effective area is not the projected are of the molding, but rather the cross sectional area
of the molding in different directions
• Fno
• Feject
• When the pin is actuated with the ejection system, a reaction force
will develop between the pin and the molded part before the part is Compressive stress on the pin
ejected
• The magnitude of this force is related to the total ejection force
required to eject the part as well as the number, location and
geometry of the ejectors.
• The compressive stress on the pin is the force on the pin divided by
the area of the pin.
• To avoid fatigue and/or buckling of the ejection system
components, compressive stress levels must be maintained below a
Total push area of all ejectors
critical; threshold. This critical stress is dependent upon the
material; and treatment of the ejectors. Most ejector pins and
sleeve are made of hardened materials. With fatigue limit stresses
on the order of 800 MPa.
• A conservative mold design, however may assume a lower fatigue
limit stress of 450 MPa for P20. In either case, the total push area
of all ejectors to void excessive stresses must meet the requirement.
BDD 40903 Prepared by : Mohd Hilmi Othman 16
Ejector push area and parameter
Calculation example for push area of all ejectors
Calculate:
1. Shear stress exerted on the
molded part.
2. Total parameter of the ejector
system.
• Once the required push area and perimeter of the ejectors is known, different ejector systems designs can
be developed.
• The mold designer should consider different designs with a varying number and sizes of ejectors.
• There are advantages and disadvantages to have a large quantity of small ejector pins compared to have
fewer but larger ejector pins.
• With respect to tooling and operation costs, a smaller number of large ejector requires a lower number of
mold components and features to be machined. For this reason, the mold is less expensive to manufacture
and maintain.
• Meanwhile the larger size of ejectors will tend to have very low compressive stresses and thus be less
susceptible to buckle.
• With respect to design flexibility and mold operation, however a larger number of small ejector pins
are preferred.
• There are several reason:
a) Greater number of ejector pins allows more frequent placement of the ejector across the cavity
b) This higher density of ejectors will tend to provide more uniform venting and ejection
c) At the same time smaller sized ejectors allow greater design flexibility with respect to the
placement of the ejectors.
BDD 40903 Prepared by : Mohd Hilmi Othman 20
Type, number and size of ejector
• Molds contain many tightly spaced and complex features, so small Typical ejector
ejector sizes allows pins to be effectively placed between cooling lines,
down narrow cores, on side walls or ribs, etc. components
• The mold designer should remember that the previous analysis only
ejector pins
provides a lower limit for number and size of ejectors.
blades
• The mold designer can always add ejectors or increase the ejector size
sleeves
to improve the uniformity of ejection or reduce stress in the molded part.
stripper plate
• The mold designer must also determine the type of ejector to be used at
slides
various locations.
lifter
• Typical ejector components include ejector pins, blades, sleeves, stripper
angle pins
plate, slides, lifter, angle pins, core pulls, collapsible cores, expandable
core pulls
cavities, split cavity molds, and others.
collapsible cores
• The selection of the most appropriate component is heavily dependent on
expandable cavities
the requirements and geometry of the application.
split cavity molds
10 or 40 ejector
pins? Which
one is better?
• The design for 10 evenly spaced, 4.5 mm ejector pins is shown in Figure
11.9.
• Since the gates are located on the left and right side walls, the ejector pins
located at the center of the top and bottom walls would provide needed
venting at the end of flow.
• This design, however, may be unsuitable for two reason :
a) The may not be enough ejectors at locations near where the
molding will stick in the mold. In particular the ribs and bosses
will tend to shrink onto the core and so require nearby ejector pins.
b) The ejector pin diameter is slightly large give the close proximity
of the nearby ribs.
• In this design, only 1 mm of steel separates the ejector hole from the
surface of the mold cavity.
• With the melts pressures, stresses will develop in the steel, deforming
the ejector holes to be non- round, causing the ejector pins to bind.
• Eventually, cracks will propagate between the ejector hole and the mold
cavity. For these reasons, the ejector pins should be made smaller and
more strategically located.
Mould base ejector cooling slider lifter electrode The ejector assembly. The hole layouts made from the steel
Effectiveness of ejectors
size location.
• The previous example implied that the effectiveness of an ejector is not simply a function of its size but also its location.
• In general, ejectors will be more effective when placed near the locations where the ejection forces are generated.
• Furthermore, the ejectors will be more effective when pushing on rigid areas of the molded part.
• A common but ineffective layout arise when ejector pins are uniformly distributed across the mold cavity.
• Such an approach can give rise to the layout design shown in Figure 11.10 with an ejector pin located relatively far from
the ribs and side walls of the molding.
Ejector Pins
Ejector plate
Ejector sleeve Ejector plate
• The result from this example indicated that the minimum diameter required to avoid buckling is on
the same order of magnitude as the minimum diameter required to avoid excessive compressive
stress in the pin or excessive shear stress in the molding.
• The results from the buckling analysis and example are strongly dependent upon the length of the
ejector pin, if the pin length was longer, then the buckling constraint would be dominant.
• The mold designer should perform analysis for their molding application to confirm the driving
constraint and ensure and adequate ejector design.
• Finally, the rib is not an aesthetic surface, and so should not be adversely affected by the witness mark left
by the ejector blade, through this is a potential area of stress concentration during the molding’s end-use.
• Just like the ejector pin and blades, the reverse actuation of the ejector retainer plate causes the ejector
sleeve to retract into the core insert for the next molding cycle.
• Given the geometry of the ejector sleeve, there are typically no issue related to the stress or buckling.
• However, the detailed design of the ejector sleeve is especially critical since it slides along between a
stationary core pin and the stationary core insert.
• The actual location of the ejector sleeve is governed by the concentric mating of the ejector sleeve with the
ejector hole in the core insert.
BDD 40903 Prepared by : Mohd Hilmi Othman 46
Ejector sleeve
• Since the core pin is internal to the sleeve, the
wall thickness and concentricity of the molding
around the core pin is governed by the tolerance
stack up of the ejector hole, ejector sleeve and
core pin.
• To reduce dimensional variations in the molded
part, clearances for venting should be
minimized.
• Details B to F in Figure 11.18 provide examples
of clearance in the various mold plates.
• The mold designer should ensure that the core pin
has suitable clearance through the ejector plate
and ejector retainer plate, otherwise a slight lack
of concentricity between the ejector sleeve and
the core pin may cause sleeve to bind.
Ejector
puller bolts
to push the
stripper
plate when
ejecting
• There are some important items to note with regard to the design details A and B, which are identified in
Figure 11.20, and magnified in Figure 11.21.
• One significant issue with respect to this specific molding application is the location of the parting line
along the top of the cup.
• From the viewpoint of the mold design, the center of the rounded top would be the best location to mate
the stripper plate with the core inset since it would provide a reliable sliding surface.
• However this mating location would result in an undesirable and possibly sharp witness line.
BDD 40903 Prepared by : Mohd Hilmi Othman 51
Ejector plate
• As such, the mating location has been
moved towards the interior of the core
insert.
• While this provides an improved witness
line location and a significant push area for
the stripper plate to push on the molded cup,
it also results in a sharp edge at the
parting line of the stripper plate.
• This sharp edge can damage the vertical
surface of the core insert and will likely
quickly wear.
• For this reason, the mold designer may wish
to avoid the use of a stripper plate or
request the redesign of this section of the
cup to provide a flat push area to mate with
the stripper plate.