Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Structural
Interpretation
Methods
2
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe
1A-1: Defining folds Dip domains are separated by axial surfaces; imaginary planes which, when viewed in two dimensions,
form axial traces. Anticlinal axial surfaces occupy concave-downward fold hinges; synclinal axial surfaces
occupy concave-upward fold hinges.
Folds are bends or flexures of layered rock that form in response to motion along faults,
diapirism, compaction, and regional subsidence or uplift. Folds are expressed in seismic axial trace
reflection profiles as one or more regions of dipping reflections (dip domains) that corre-
spond to inclined stratigraphic contacts.
Folds are composed of one or more dip domains, and may have angular or curved fold
shapes:
anticlines
fold limbs crest
Axial surfaces often occur in pairs that bound fold limbs, which are also called kink bands:
two sets of paired
axial surfaces
single hinge multiple hinges
curved hinge paired
axial surfaces
synclines
Monocline,
San Joaquin
Valley,
California, Multiple Hinge Anticline, Permian Basin, Texas, U.S.A.
U.S.A.
Syncline,
Santa Barbara
Channel,
California,
U.S.A.
4
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Parallel folds commonly form by a deformation
Folds and bedding thickness mechanism called flexural slip, where folding is
Folds are classified based on whether or not the thickness of stratigraphic layers changes in dip domains or across axial accommodated by motions on minor faults that
surfaces. occur along some mechanical layering — usually
bedding. Flexural-slip surfaces, which can be
Parallel folds preserve layer thickness, and are common in strata that deformed predominantly by flexural slip (see inset observed in core or outcrop, may vary in spacing
at right). Axial surfaces bisect inter-limb angles in parallel folds.
from a few millimeters to several tens of meters in
Parallel fold model Parallel fold, synclinal axial surface spacing.
slip surfaces
Various types of folds exhibit non-parallel behavior, where the thick- The amount of off-
ness of stratigraphic layers changes gradually in dip domains or set on flexural-slip
abruptly across axial surfaces. These thickness changes may be caused Non-Parallel fold, anticlinal axial surface faults increases as
by various deformation mechanisms, including ductile flow within the fold tightens
incompetent beds. Alternatively, thickness changes may be deposi- (note slip increase
tional in origin. Axial surfaces do not bisect interlimb angles in non-par- from models 1 to
allel folds. Rather, axial surface orientations are governed by the mag- 2), and is a func-
nitude of the change in bed thickness. tion of the spacing
of slip surfaces.
Non-parallel fold model
Slip changes
instantaneously
across axial sur-
faces in angular
folds (models 1, 2);
whereas, slip
increases along
bedding surfaces
through the hinge
in curved-hinge
folds (model 3).
5
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Shortcomings in seismic images of folds Locating axial surfaces in seismic sections
Folds can be distorted or only partially imaged in seismic sections. Migration moves dipping reflections upward and laterally to properly image the fold geometry,
Two common shortcomings are: but reflections on non-migrated or under-migrated sections do not accurately represent fold
Overlapping reflections in non-migrated or under-migrated sections; shape. However, axial surfaces can be inferred on these sections by mapping the truncations of
and horizontal reflections.
poor imaging of steeply dipping fold limbs.
Model Stacked section (synthetic)
Balanced model
Step 1: Pinpoint truncations of horizontal
reflections as they enter the poorly imaged
zone. Note that diffractions, dipping toward
the fold, may emanate from these trunca-
tions.
Stacked
section
Migrated
section
axial surface
6
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Interpreting folds in poorly imaged zones B: Method for interpreting parallel folds in poorly imaged zones
Poorly imaged zones on folds are commonly caused by, and interpreted as, faults or Step 1: Pinpoint truncations Step 2: Fit parallel axial sur- Step 3: Define the dip of beds
steep limbs. Both solutions are often permissible and should be evaluated. Here, we of reflections as they enter faces that best match the in the kink band by making γ2
describe a method of interpreting parallel folds in poorly imaged zones. the poorly imaged zone. aligned truncations. Measure equal to γ1.
the average dip outside of the
fold limb and measure γ1.
A: Is the poorly imaged zone a fault or steep fold limb?
fault
water-bottom
multiples
fold
reflection
truncations
7
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
1A-2: Recognizing thrust and reverse faults
Faults are identified in seismic reflection profiles through: Recognizing and interpreting faults in seismic section
fault cutoffs — terminations of reflections or abrupt changes of reflection fault cutoffs
attributes (e.g., amplitude, polarity) at fault surfaces;
inferred fault Abrupt terminations (cutoffs)
position cutoff
terminations of fold limbs or kink bands; and and duplications of prominent
reflections constrain the posi-
direct fault-plane reflections, produced by changes in velocity and density across tion of a gently dipping thrust
or within fault zones. fault. (2-D seismic data, Permian
cutoff
Cutoffs and fault plane reflections (criteria 1 and 3) directly constrain fault positions. Thrust basin, Texas, U.S.A.)
faults and their cutoffs, however, are generally difficult to image and identify, and thus the recog-
nition of kink-band terminations (criterion 2) is a vital component of interpreting these faults. In
this section, we describe how these criteria can be used together to identify and interpret thrust
and reverse faults in seismic sections.
Data courtesy of Texaco, Inc.
Fault cutoffs and kink-band terminations kink-band terminations
balanced model Fault with offset markers and cutoffs.
Thrust faults and bed-parallel detachments can be identified by the abrupt, downward termina-
Note that hanging wall kink bands termi-
tions of kink bands. Terminations are generally marked by regions of dipping reflections above
nate downward into the fault surface.
horizontal or more gently dipping reflections, and may contain fault cutoffs. Dipping reflections
Incipient fault with markers along
hanging wall in kink bands represent strata folded in the hanging wall of a thrust/reverse fault or detachment;
fault surface. cutoffs whereas, horizontal or more gently dipping reflections represent footwall strata below the fault
or detachment. Thus faults and/or detachments should be interpreted at the transition between
these two dip domains.
footwall cutoffs
inferred
in outcrop in synthetic seismic detachment
Seismic forward model showing fault
Fault cutoffs in outcrop, Mississip-
cutoffs (1) and downward terminating
pian Joana limestone, Nevada, U.S.A.
kink-bands (2). fault-plane
reflection
inferred fault
Downward terminating kink band (2) defines Downward terminating kink band (2) and
fault
the position of a gently dipping thrust. (3-D fault-plane reflection (3) define the position
seismic data, Permian basin, Texas, U.S.A.). of a thrust fault that shallows to an upper
detachment. (3-D seismic data/Niger Delta).
8
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Interpreting thrust ramps on seismic sections
Combinations of the three fault recognition Seismic Example: Peruvian Andes
criteria are employed to interpret thrust
faults on the seismic section presented
here.
9
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Recognizing detachments Seismic Example: Sichuan basin, China
Detachments are faults that run along bedding or other stratigraphic horizons, and thus
generally are horizontal or dip at low angles. In fold and thrust belts, detachments are
commonly referred to as decollements. Detachments are generally not imaged directly
on seismic sections, but rather are interpreted at the base and/or top of thrust ramps.
Basal detachments can be located in seismic sections by defining the downward termi-
nations of kink bands, as described on the preceding pages.
ramp
detachment
10
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1A-3: Recognizing growth strata
Growth or syntectonic strata are stratigraphic intervals that were deposited during defor-
mation. The ages of growth strata therefore define the timing of deformations. In contrac-
tional fault-related folds, growth strata typically thin across fold limbs toward structural
highs. The geometries of growth structures are controlled primarily by the folding mecha-
nism and the relative rates of sedimentation and uplift. Thus, growth fold patterns imaged
in seismic data are often considered diagnostic of folding mechanism and sediment-to-
uplift ratio. In this section, we describe common patterns of growth strata in fault-related
folds that are imaged in seismic reflection data.
Growth strata in seismic section:
Growth strata in seismic section: Uplift exceeds sedimentation
Sedimentation exceeds uplift
onlapping onlapping
growth strata growth strata
pre-growth strata
growth strata
pre-growth strata
In cases where the uplift rate exceeds the sedimentation rate, growth strata typically
thin toward, and onlap, the structural high. Growth strata are generally not present
above the fold crest, but are folded in one or more limbs of the structure. In this seis-
In cases where the sedimentation rate exceeds the uplift rate, growth strata are typically char-
mic section, growth strata onlap the backlimb and forelimb of a fault-related fold. The
acterized as sequences, bounded by two or more seismic reflections, that thin toward the
growth strata are overlain by post-tectonic strata, which are described later in this sec-
structural high. Growth strata are generally folded in one or more limbs of the structure. In this
tion. (This structure is interpreted more completely in sections 1B-1 and 1B-4).
seismic section, growth strata thin onto the fold crest, with the lowermost growth units exhibit-
ing the greatest thickness changes. (2-D seismic data, reprinted from Shaw et al., 1997).
11
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Growth strata as records of fold kinematics
Two folding mechanisms — kink-band migration and limb rotation — are commonly ascribed to contractional fault-related folds. These folding mechanisms typically yield distinctive patterns of
deformed growth strata above fold limbs. Thus, seismic images of growth folds can be used to identify the folding mechanisms, which in turn can dictate the kinematic theory (e.g., fault-bend fold-
ing or detachment folding) that is most appropriate to guide the structural interpretation of the seismic data.
Folding by kink-band migration Folding by progressive limb rotation
pre-growth strata only sedimentation > uplift sedimentation < uplift pre-growth strata only sedimentation > uplift sedimentation < uplift
growth
growth
strata
strata
onlaps
pre-growth strata onlaps
pre-growth strata
In fault-related folds that develop purely by kink-band migration, fold limbs widen through time In fault-related folds that develop purely by limb rotation with fixed hinges (i.e., inactive axial
while maintaining a fixed dip (Suppe et al., 1992), as illustrated in the sequential model involv- surfaces), the dip of the fold limb increases with each increment of folding as illustrated in the
ing pre-growth strata only (above left). Material is incorporated into the fold limb by passing sequential model involving pre-growth strata only (left). In the case where sedimentation rate
through an active axial surface, which at depth is generally pinned to a bend or tip of a fault exceeds uplift rate (center), strata are progressively rotated with each increment of folding.
(Suppe, 1983; Suppe and Medwedeff, 1990). The fold limb in growth strata is bounded by the
Thus, older growth horizons dip more steeply than do younger horizons, yielding a pro-
active axial surface and the growth axial surface, an inactive axial surface that defines the locus
of particles originally deposited along the active axial surface. In these sequential models, the nounced fanning of limb dips in growth strata. Fold limb width, however, remains constant. In
synclinal axial surface is active, and the anticlinal axial surface is inactive. the case where uplift rate exceeds sedimentation rate, growth strata also exhibit a fanning of
limb dips. However, growth strata typically onlap the fold limb.
In the case where sedimentation rate exceeds uplift rate (above center), strata are folded
through the synclinal axis and incorporated into the widening fold limb. The dip of folded
Contractional fault-related folding theories that exclusively invoke limb rotation include cer-
growth strata is equal to dip of the fold limb in pre-growth strata. The width of the dip panel
for each growth horizon corresponds to the amount of fold growth that occurred subsequent tain classes of detachment folds (Dahlstrom, 1990; Hardy and Poblet, 1994).
to the deposition of that marker. As a result, younger horizons have narrower fold limbs than
do older horizons, forming narrowing upward fold limbs or kink bands in growth strata (growth
triangles). In the case where uplift rate exceeds sedimentation rate (above right), each incre-
ment of folding produces a discrete fold scarp located where the active axial surface projects
to the Earth’s surface (Shaw et al., 2004). Subsequent deposits onlap the fold scarp, producing
stratigraphic pinchouts above the fold limb. Fold scarps and stratigraphic pinch-outs are dis-
placed laterally and folded as they are incorporated into widening limbs.
Contractional fault-related folding theories that exclusively invoke kink-band migration include
fault-bend folding (Suppe, 1983), constant-thickness and fixed axis fault-propagation folding
(Suppe and Medwedeff, 1983), and basement-involved (triple junction) folding (Narr and Suppe,
1994).
12
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Growth structures in seismic data Folding by progressive limb rotation
Growth structures imaged in seismic sections commonly exhibit patterns that are similar to Seismic Example: offshore Angola
the kink-band migration or limb-rotation models that were described on the previous page. In
other cases, folds may develop by a combination of kink-band migration and limb rotation, fanning of limb dips
resulting in hybrid patterns of growth structure. This section presents three seismic profiles
as examples of kink-band migration, limb rotation, and hybrid growth structures.
growth triangle
salt mound
limb rotation model
growth
strata
detachment
(top) The seismic section above shows a narrowing upward fold limb, or growth triangle,
where bed dips within the fold limb generally do not shallow upward, consistent with folding
by kink-band migration. Dipmeter data in the wells corroborates the reflector dips. (upper
right) In this section, a fanning and upward shallowing of limb dips within growth strata are
consistent with folding by progressive limb rotation. The core of the anticline is filled with
salt, which presumably thickened during deformation, leading to progressive rotation of the
overlying fold limbs. (lower right) The growth structure in this section contains both a growth hybrid model
triangle and a fanning of limb dips, suggesting folding by a combination of kink-band migra- growth triangle
growth
tion and limb rotation mechanisms. Kinematic theories that employ hybrid folding mecha- strata
nisms include shear fault-bend folds (Suppe et al., 2004; see section 1A-4), certain classes of
detachment folds (Dahlstrom, 1990; Hardy and Poblet, 1994; see section 1B-3), and trishear
fault-propagation folds (Erslev, 1991; Hardy and Ford, 1997; Allmendinger, 1998; see section
1B-2).
13
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Distinguishing drape from growth strata
Sedimentary drape sequences are stratigraphic intervals that were deposited above a structure after deformation ceased, yet they are warped due to primary sedimentary dip and/or compaction.
Drape sequences exhibit a wide range of patterns depending on the sedimentary environment and facies. In some cases, drape sequences have patterns that are similar to those of growth strata
deformed by limb rotation. In this section, we illustrate the potential similarity of drape and growth patterns, and show an example of a drape sequence in a seismic section.
Drape folding
Kinematic models Seismic Example: offshore California Borderlands, U.S.A.
Drape sequence
axial surfaces
dips away from crest
drape
growth
strata drape
The top model shows a post-tectonic drape sequence above a rigid basement
high. The drape sequence thins toward the crest of the structure, with
younger strata having less relief than older units. The lower model shows basement
growth strata above a fold developed by progressive limb rotation. The two
stratigraphic patterns are similar, and in some cases difficult to distinguish.
Incorrect interpretations of drape and growth sequences can lead to flawed
estimates of structural timing and kinematics. Thus, care should be taken in
trying to distinguish between drape and growth sequences.
One common difference between drape and growth sequences is the orien-
tation of axial surfaces. Axial surfaces in drape sequences often are vertical
or dip away from the structural crest, reflecting a state of tension and due, in
some cases, to compaction (Laubach et al., 2000). In contrast, axial surfaces
in contractional folds generally dip toward the structural crest, reflecting a
state of compression. Thus, careful interpretation of axial surfaces, along
with consideration of regional tectonic history, can, in some cases, help to This seismic section images a siliciclastic drape sequence that onlaps
distinguish between drape and growth sequences. and overlies a ridge of metamorphic basement rocks.
14
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1B-1: Fault-bend folds
Basic concept Synclinal fault-bend folds
Fault-bend folds form as hanging wall-rocks move over bends in an underlying fault. This sec- Synclinal fault-bend folds form at concave-upward fault bends. Synclinal axial surfaces are
tion describes the geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding after Suppe (1983) and intro- pinned to the fault bend and are generally active; whereas anticlinal axial surfaces are inactive
duces basic techniques for interpreting these structures in seismic data. and move with the hanging wall block. Figures below show a kinematic model, a field example,
and a seismic example of synclinal fault-bend folds.
To describe the basic concept of fault-bend folding, we will consider the hypothetical case of a Field Example
fault in cross section with one bend joining upper and lower segments. Rigid-block translation
of the hanging wall parallel to the upper fault segment produces a void between the fault
blocks; whereas, translation of the hanging wall parallel to the lower fault segment produces an
“overlap.” Both of these cases are unreasonable. axial surface
Kinematic Model
Rigid-Block
Translation
fault
axial surface
In contrast, folding of the hanging wall block through the development of a kink band accom-
modates fault slip without generating an unreasonable overlap or void. This fault-bend folding
(Suppe, 1983) is localized along an active axial surface, which is fixed with respect to the fault
bend. After strata are folded at the active axial surface, they are translated above the upper
fault segment. The inactive axial surface marks the locus of particles that were located along
the active axial surface at the initiation of fault slip. The inactive axial surface moves away from
the active axial surface with progressive fault slip, and thus the width of the intervening kink
band is proportional to the amount of fault slip.
Fault-Bend
Folding
fault
15
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Anticlinal fault-bend folds Seismic Example: Niger Delta
Anticlinal fault-bend folds form at concave-downward fault bends. Anticlinal axial surfaces
are pinned to the fault bend and are generally active; whereas, synclinal axial surfaces are
inactive and move with the hanging wall block. Figures below show a kinematic model, a
field example, and seismic examples of anticlinal fault-bend folds.
axial surface
Kinematic Model
fault
Field Example
axial surface
axial surface
fault
fault
16
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Quantitative fault-bend folding Where θ is the hanging wall cutoff angle before the fault bend; φ When interpreting seismic sections, typically the interlimb angle
is the change in fault dip; β is the hanging wall cutoff after the (γ) can be observed (see section 1A-2) and one of the hanging
Based on assumptions of conservation of bed length and thick- fault bend, and; γ is one half of the interlimb angle, such that the wall cutoff angles (θ or β) can be specified. Using the graph, the
ness during folding, the shape of a fault-bend fold is related to axial surfaces bisect the interlimb angles and bed thicknesses change in fault dip (φ) and the remaining cutoff angle can be
the shape of the fault by: are preserved. If two of these values are known, the remaining determined.
two values can be determined.
For anticlinal fault-bend folds there are two fold solutions for
The fault-bend fold relations are displayed in the graph below. each θ and φ value; first mode solutions produce open folds that
The left side of the graph describes anticlinal fault-bend folds, have been shown to effectively describe many observed fold
where the fold is concave toward the fault; the right side of the geometries; whereas, second mode solutions are geometrically
graph describes synclinal fault-bend folds, where the fold is con- valid but have not been shown to effectively describe natural
vex toward the fault. fold shapes.
17
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Fault slip and fault-bend folds In cases where the initial cut-off angle (θ) equals zero, then R
equals one (R=1). When the initial cut-off angle (θ) does not equal
steep limbs) anticlinal folds generally consume larger amounts
of slip (hence they have lower R values) than do gentle anticlinal
The magnitude of fault slip can change across fault bends, as slip zero, R can be determined if any two of the four geometric param- folds. Tight synclinal folds generally produce larger amounts of
is consumed or produced by fault-bend folding. In cases where eters (θ, φ, β, γ) are specified using fault-bend fold theory (Suppe, slip (hence they have higher R values) than do gentle anticlinal
the initial cutoff angle is not equal to zero (θ ⫽ 0), anticlinal fault- 1983). The graph below plots R as a function of initial cut-off angle folds.
bend folds consume fault slip and synclinal fault-bend folds pro- (θ), interlimb angle (γ), and change in fault dip (φ), and is of the
duce fault slip. The change in fault slip is described by the same format used to describe fault-bend fold geometry. In both synclinal and anticlinal fault-bend folds with a single fault
parameter R, which is the ratio of slip magnitude beyond (S1) bend, the width of the fold limb measured along the fault equals
and before (S0) the fault bend. R varies greatly as a function of the tightness of the fold, which the slip (S1).
is reflected in part by the interlimb angle (γ). Tight (perhaps with
18
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Seismic interpretation of a synclinal fault-bend fold 2. Synclinal fault-bend fold graph
This section describes the interpretation of a synclinal fault-bend fold imaged in seismic reflec-
tion data. The lower portion of the fault and the syncline are well imaged, and fault-bend fold-
ing theory is used to predict the orientation of the upper portion of the fault.
Using the synclinal fault bend fold graph (Figure 2), γ and θ are used to determine
the change in fault dip (φ) and the hanging wall cutoff after the fault bend (β):
φ = 15°; β = 14°
φ and β values are used to model the structure in Figure 3. Note that the predicted
upper fault segment agrees closely with the fault position as constrained by reflec-
tion terminations and potential fault-plane reflections.
19
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Seismic interpretation of an anticlinal fault-bend fold 2. Anticlinal fault-bend fold graph
This section describes the interpretation of an anticlinal fault-bend fold imaged in seismic
reflection data.
In Figure 1, fault-plane reflections and reflection truncations define the position of a thrust
ramp located beneath an anticline. Based on the imaged fold shape and fault ramp, the initial
cut-off angle (θ) and interlimb angle (γ) can be defined as:
θ = 24°; γ = 80°
Using the anticlinal fault bend fold graph (Figure 2), γ and θ are used to determine the change
in fault dip (φ) and the hanging wall cutoff after the fault bend (β):
φ = 16°; β = 28
φ and β values are used to model the structure in Figure 3. Note that the predicted upper fault
segment agrees closely with the fault position as constrained by reflection terminations and
the downward termination of the forelimb.
In this example, slip below the fault bend (S0) is also interpreted based on offset reflections.
Based on the slip ratio R predicted for this fault-bend fold (obtained using the graph present-
ed in the previous section), the slip above the fault bend (S1) is calculated as follows:
R = (S0/S1) = 0.87; given S0 = 1.7 km, then S1 = 1.5 km
Anticlinal fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
1. Observations / Initial Interpretation 3. Prediction
20
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Composite fault-bend folds: Ramp anticlines
The most common representation of a fault-bend fold involves deformation above a thrust ramp connecting upper and lower detachments, often referred to as a ramp anticline. In fact, this structure
consists of two fault-bend folds — one related to each fault bend — and thus is part of a class of “composite” fault-bend folds. This section describes the kinematic evolution of a simple ramp anti-
cline after Suppe (1983), the geometry of which is governed by the quantitative fault-bend folding theories described in the preceding pages.
Kinematic development of a composite fault-bend fold Seismic Example: Pitas Point, Santa Barbara Channel, California, U.S.A.
Uninterpreted section
bends
fault
Interpreted section
refolded refolded
axial surface
axial surface
0: Incipient fault with two convex upward bends. 0: Incipient fault with two concave upward bends.
1: Slip yields two kink bands associated with the 1: Slip yields two kink bands associated with the
two fault bends. 2: Kink bands widen with pro- two fault bends. 2: Kink bands widen with pro-
fault
gressive slip. 3: Portions of kink bands are refold- gressive slip. 3: A portion of the lower kink band is
ed, yielding a steeply dipping fold panel. refolded as it moves onto the upper fault ramp.
22
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Modeling curved fold hinges
Folds generally exhibit some curvature in their hinges. Most fault-related fold analysis techniques approximate these curved hinge zones as perfectly angular folds or as multi-bend folds
composed of two or more planar hinge segments (Medwedeff and Suppe, 1997). In many cases, these approximations adequately describe large folds, with small zones of hinge curvature
separating long, planar fold limbs of the scale typically imaged in seismic data. Moreover, these approximations are useful because they allow for rigorous area and line length balancing.
In some cases, however, it may be necessary to more accurately describe curved hinge zones. Here we introduce a curved-hinge fault-bend fold model after Suppe et al. (1997), which obeys
fault-bend folding relations but imparts fault curvature on the fold shape using the concept of entry and exit axial surfaces. Other techniques of modeling curved fold hinges (e.g., trishear
folding — Erslev, 1991) are described in later sections.
Seismic Example: Sichuan basin, China
Synclinal fault-bend folds
Uninterpreted section
Angular Hinge Multibend Hinge Curved Hinge
incipient entry axial surface
incipient axial surface incipient axial surface incipient exit axial surface
active axial surface active axial surfaces entry active axial surface
inactive axial surface inactive axial surfaces exit active axial surface
Interpreted section
Sequential models of a syncli- Sequential models of a multi- Sequential models of a curved hinge syn-
nal fault-bend fold with an bend synclinal fault-bend fold clinal fault-bend fold. 0: Two incipient ac-
angular hinge. with two fault ramp segments. tive axial surfaces bound the zone of cur-
vature on the fault. 1: Slip causes folding
of the hanging wall rocks. Folding begins
as rocks pass through the entry active
axial surface (A), and ceases as rocks
pass through the exit active axial surface
(B). 2: Progressive slip widens the kink
band, as inactive axial surfaces (A⬘ and
B⬘) are passively translated up the fault
ramp.
23
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Growth fault-bend folds — high sedimentation rates Seismic Example: Santa Barbara Channel, California, U.S.A.
Fault-bend folds develop by kink-band migration, where fold limbs maintain a constant dip but gen- Active synclinal axial surface — backlimb FBF
erally widen as fault slip increases. When sedimentation rate exceeds uplift rate, folds that devel-
op by kink-band migration have syntectonic (growth) strata that form narrowing upward dip
domains, or growth triangles, above fold limbs (see section 1A-3). Below, we use kinematic models
to describe how these growth structures develop in a composite fault-bend fold, and show exam-
ples of growth structures in seismic sections.
Fault-bend fold with growth strata
growth
pre-growth
forelimb
Sequential model of a growth fault-bend fold (Suppe et al., 1992; Shaw et al., 1996) with sedimenta-
tion rate > uplift rate. Model 1 consists of a composite fault-bend fold developed above a ramp
between detachments. The fold is in the crestal uplift stage of growth (Shaw et al., 1994b), as fault
slip is less than ramp width. In Model 2, additional slip widens the kink bands, which narrow
upward in the growth section (see section 1A-4). In Model 3, fault slip is greater than ramp width.
Thus, strata are refolded from the back limb (A-A⬘⬘) onto the crest of the structure, which widens
with fault slip (crestal broadening stage, Shaw et al., 1994b). Growth strata are also folded above
the crest, as they pass through active axial surface A⬘⬘. Forelimb axial surfaces (B-B⬘) are released
from the fault bend and passively translated above the upper detachment, and thus do not deform
young growth strata.
24
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Growth Fault-Bend Folds — low sedimentation rates
In cases where sedimentation rate is less than or equal to the uplift rate, fault-bend folds develop patterns in growth strata that are distinct from growth triangles (see section 1A-3). In limbs with
active synclinal axial surfaces, growth strata are folded concordantly with the underlying kink band; whereas, in limbs with inactive synclinal axial surfaces growth strata simply onlap kink bands.
Below we describe how these growth patterns are expressed in a composite fault-bend fold after Medwedeff (1989) and Suppe et al. (1992).
pre-growth
forelimb backlimb
Seismic Example: San Joaquin basin, California, U.S.A.
Composite Fault-Bend Fold with Growth Strata
crestal uplift stage
onlapping folded
growth strata growth strata
folded
growth strata
onlapping
growth strata
time transgressive
angular unconformity
Common characteristics
Although fault-propagation folds exhibit a
wide range of geometries, several charac-
teristics are common to most structures,
including:
1) folds are asymmetric, with forelimbs that
are generally much steeper and more nar-
row than their corresponding backlimbs;
fault
2) synclines are pinned to the fault tips;
3) folds tighten with depth; and
purple arrows denote slip on the
4) slip on the fault decreases upward, ter- base and top of the green unit
minating within the fold.
26
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Constant thickness fault-propagation folds
Suppe and Medwedeff (1990) present a general relationship between fold shape and fault
shape for parallel (constant thickness) fault propagation folds assuming angular fold
hinges and conservation of bed length. This section describes the kinematic develop-
ment of a constant-thickness fault-propagation fold, and the quantitative relations that
can be used to model or interpret these structures.
FPF terminology
The following terms are used in the derivation
and graphs that describe fault-propagation folds.
θ1 = hanging wall cut-off (lower fault segment)
θ2 = footwall cut-off (upper fault segment)
φ = change in fault dip
γ = forelimb syncline interlimb angle
γ* = anticlinal interlimb angle
␦b = backlimb dip
␦f = forelimb dip
27
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Fixed-axis fault-propagation folds
Suppe and Medwedeff (1990) present a second, general relationship between fold
shape and fault shape called fixed-axis fault-propagation fold theory. This theory is
similar to the constant thickness theory, except that it allows for bed thinning or
thickening in the forelimb (see also Jamison, 1987). These thickness changes are
induced because the forelimb anticlinal axial surface is fixed, meaning that material
does not pass through it. The style and magnitude of bed thickness changes are dic-
tated by the initial fault shape and cut-off angles. This section describes the kine-
matic development of a fixed-axis fault-propagation fold, and the quantitative rela-
tions that can be used to model and interpret these structures.
FPF terminology
Fixed-axis theory redefines the axial angles (γ
These graphs show the relationships between fault shape (θ2) and fold shape (γe, γe*, γi, and γi*) for
values) associated with a fault-propagation
fixed-axis fault-propagations folds. The special case of ramping from a detachment is shown on the two
fold. The remaining parameters (θ, φ, δb, and δf)
graphs at left as the lines θ2 = φ. Note that separate graphs must be used to define the interior (γi, and
are the same as in constant thickness fault-
γi*) and exterior (γe and γe*) axial angles.
propagation folds.
γe = forelimb syncline exterior axial angle
γi = forelimb syncline interior axial angle
γe*= anticlinal exterior axial angle
γi* = anticlinal exterior axial angle
28
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Seismic interpretation using fault-propagation fold theory
This section presents an interpretation of a structure imaged in seismic reflection data as a fault-propagation fold as described by Suppe and Medwedeff (1990). The seismic profile shows a highly
asymmetric fold, with a poorly imaged forelimb, which are characteristics of many seismic images of fault-propagation folds.
The seismic section shown below is interpreted in five steps on this and the following page. To help distinguish between the two alternative theories, the graph below (from Suppe and Medwedeff,
1990) shows the relationship of forelimb to backlimb dips for both constant thickness and fixed axis fault propagation folds. Pairs of limb dips that plot along the “Fixed-Axis Theory” curve indicate
that the structure may be interpreted using this theory. Limb dips that plot along, or to the left of, the φ = θ2 curve may be interpreted using constant-thickness theory. The two theories are coinci-
dent along the portion of the “Fixed-Axis Theory” curve that lies on, or to the left of, the φ = θ2 curve.
Limb dips in fault-propagation folds
Limb dips estimated from seismic profile
Step 2: Based on the forelimb (δf = 58°) and backlimb (δb = 11°) dips estimated on the seis-
mic profile, the fold is inconsistent with fixed-axis theory. However, the structure may be
interpreted as a constant thickness fault-propagation fold with a change in fault dip (φ) of 7°
and an initial cutoff angle (θ1) of 42°. On the following page, these values are used to predict
Step 1: Limb dips are estimated in the seismic profile by interpre- the fold shape (γ and γ*) and cutoff (θ2) angles, and to generate an interpretation of the
tation of the reflector dips on the backlimb, and by correlation of structure.
horizons 1 and 2 across the poorly imaged forelimb.
29
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Step 3: To interpret the structure using con- Initial Interpretation Complete Interpretation
stant-thickness fault propagation fold theory,
the upper portion of the fold is interpreted
using the kink method, where axial surfaces
bisect the interlimb angles (see section 1A-1).
This interpretation yields a forelimb interlimb
angle (γ) of 61°.
Trishear interpretation
Kinematic models
Growth axial surface Time transgressive unconformity
Seismic example of
a forelimb growth
triangle in a fault- truncations
propagation fold
from the Bermejo
foreland basin, cen-
tral Argentina from
Zapata and Allmen- Active axial surface
dinger (1996).
Reproduced cour-
tesy of the Ameri-
Fault-propagation folds of Suppe and Medwedeff, (1990) Trishear folds (Erslev, 1993) generally develop by can Geophysical
grow by kink-band migration, with two active axial sur- a combination of kink-band migration and limb Union. Seismic Example: Tarim basin, China
faces bounding the backlimb, and one or two active axial rotation mechanisms, and these fold kinematics
surfaces bounding the forelimb. Syntectonic strata above are reflected in growth strata. Progressive fore-
the fold limbs form growth triangles. When sedimenta- limb rotation during the formation of trishear
tion rate exceeds uplift rate, as in this model, two growth folds generally yields an upward shallowing of
triangles develop on the backlimb. Fixed-axis fault-prop- bed dips in growth strata. This fanning of limb
agation folds have a single forelimb growth triangle, dips in trishear growth folds contrasts markedly
whereas, constant thickness fault-propagation folds may with the growth triangles predicted by the con-
have one or two forelimb growth triangles depending on stant-thickness and fixed axis theories. This
the fault geometry. This sequential model (0–2), with a sequential model (0–2) (after Hardy and Ford,
29° fault ramp and a decollement, is a case where both 1997) has a sedimentation rate that slightly
constant-thickness and fixed axis theory converge to exceeds the uplift rate. The backlimb of this
yield the same geometry. model forms by fault-bend folding, yielding a sin-
gle backlimb growth triangle.
Effects of low sedimentation rates
Kinematic models
Faults in trishear and triple-junction fault-propagation folds may also breakthrough at any stage
This sequential model (1–2) shows a constant-thickness fault propagation fold (1) where
of fold growth. These models are examples of synclinal fault breakthroughs in: a) trishear fold
the fault breaks through the middle of the forelimb (2). The fault modifies the original fold
after Allmendinger (1998); and b) a triple junction model after Narr and Suppe (1994). The geome-
geometry by offsetting the hanging wall portion of the forelimb, and producing an addi-
tries of breakthrough structures in all classes of fault-propagation folds vary substantially based
tional kink band within the backlimb that develops by fault-bend folding.
on the fault path and, if the fault is non-planar, on folding kinematics after breakthrough.
Breakthrough styles
Seismic Example: Argentina
This seismic section illustrates a common forelimb breakthrough pattern. Although the forelimb
is poorly imaged, reflection truncations and the hanging wall and footwall positions of the corre-
Models showing possible types of breakthrough structures after Suppe and Medwedeff lated horizon suggest that the fault extends through the structure. Nevertheless, the basic geom-
(1990). a and b) decollement breakthroughs; c) synclinal breakthrough; d) anticlinal break- etry of the fold is consistent with a fault-propagation folding mechanism, implying that this is a
through; e) high-angle (forelimb) breakthrough; and f) low-angle breakthrough. breakthrough structure.
34
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1B-3: Detachment folds Examples
Detachment folds are common in outcrop and at scales typically imaged by seismic reflection
data. They have been documented in the foreland of fold and thrust belts such as the Jura,
Basic Concept Appalachian Plateau (Wiltschko and Chapple, 1977), and Tian Shan (Ferrari et al., section 2-14,
Detachment folds form as displacement along a bedding-parallel fault is transferred into folding this volume). Detachment folds are also common in passive margin fold belts, such as the
of the hanging wall layers. Although detachment folds may share some geometric similarities with Mississippi Fan (Rowan, 1997) and Perdido Fold Belts (Carmilo et al., section 2-24, this volume)
fault-bend and fault-propagation folds, they differ from these structures because they are not in the Gulf of Mexico, and in the Campos Basin, Brazil, (Demercian et al., 1993), and the Niger
directly related to thrust ramps but rather to distributed deformation above detachments. In this Delta (Bilotti et al., section 2-12, this volume).
section, we describe basic aspects of the geometry and kinematics of detachment folds. These
insights are used to guide the interpretation detachment folds in seismic images.
Field Example: Canadian Rockies
Common characteristics
Detachment folds generally share the following
characteristics:
1) An incompetent, ductile basal unit thickened in
core of fold, with no visible thrust ramp.
In this section, we present a geometric and kinematic model of detachment folding developed
by Poblet and McClay (1996) that is particularly useful when analyzing growth strata associat-
ed with detachment folding that involves a competent unit. These authors propose three dis-
tinct mechanisms by which a fold can develop above a propagating detachment. In each of the
models, it is the geometry and kinematics of folding in the competent layer (in particular, limb
lengths and limb dips) that controls the folding. The incompetent, or ductile layer, is able to
flow into, or out of, the fold core as deformation progresses. Layer thickness, line length, and
area are conserved in the competent layers. If the detachment level is allowed to change, or if
differential shortening occurs in the incompetent unit, then area is conserved in the ductile
layer as well.
Poblet and McClay (1996) present three modes of detachment fold growth that are illustrated
in the figure to the upper right (models 1–3), and differentiated based on their folding mecha-
nisms as follows:
1) Primarily Limb Rotation. In this model, the limb lengths remain constant but the limbs Detachment fold terminology
rotate to accommodate shortening. A small amount of material must move through the axial
surfaces, inducing a minor component of kink-band migration, as folding progresses. The
incompetent unit is area balanced only if the detachment level varies or differential shortening Lf = Front limb length
occurs in the incompetent unit. Lb = Back Limb length
2) Kink-band Migration. In this model, limb dips remain constant, but their lengths increase to S = Slip
accommodate shortening. Material moves through the synclinal axial surfaces as folding pro- ϑf = Front limb dip
gresses. The incompetent unit is area balanced only if the detachment level varies or differen-
tial shortening occurs in the incompetent unit. ϑb = Back limb dip
u = Uplift
3) Limb Rotation and Kink-band Migration. In this model, limb dips vary, as do limb lengths,
but the ratio of the limb lengths remains the same. Strata moves through axial surfaces (pri-
marily the synclinal surfaces), and rotate to accommodate shortening. The incompetent unit
area is balanced.
Two fundamental equations relate the shortening and uplift to the limb lengths and limb dips
of these detachment folds: (equations)
S = Lb (1 - cos ϑb) + Lf (1 - cos ϑf + Lt sin ϑf)
u = Lb (sin ϑb) = Lf (sin ϑf)
based on the detachment fold terminology defined in the figure to the lower right.
36
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Growth strata associated with detachment folds Kinematic models of growth detachment folds
It is usually not possible to determine the folding mechanism of a detachment anticline from the
geometry of pregrowth strata alone. For example, the three models on the previous page have
identical final geometries, but the paths they took to get there (i.e., the fold kinematics), and the
folding mechanisms, were quite different. Growth strata are, however, typically diagnostic of fold-
ing mechanism because they record the kinematic history of fold growth (see section 1A-3). Thus,
growth strata can be used to distinguish between the modes of detachment folding described by
Poblet and McClay (1996).
As illustrated in section 1A-3, kink-band migration causes growth strata to form narrowing-
upward kink bands, or growth triangles, with bed dips that are parallel to those of the underlying
pregrowth strata. Growth triangles are bounded by at least one active axial surface. In contrast,
limb rotation causes progressive changes in limb dips that result in a fanning of limb dips in
growth strata. In limb rotation structures, a minor amount of material may still move through
axial surfaces that are continuously changing orientation, resulting in a minor amount of kink-
band migration. Poblet and McClay (1996) refer to these as “limited-activity axial surfaces.”
These models define the activity of axial surfaces that are involved in the three types of detach-
ment folds defined by Poblet and McClay (1996):
Based on these fold kinematics, growth strata have distinctive patterns in each type of detach-
ment folds that are shown in the models (1–3) at upper right, which are described as follows:
1) Primarily Limb Rotation. In this model, growth strata predominantly display fanning of dips,
recording the progressive rotation of the fold limbs. Small growth triangles form that define
growth strata which migrated through the limited-activity axial surfaces.
2) Kink-band Migration. In this model, growth strata form growth triangles because strata have
migrated through the active synclinal axial surfaces.
3) Limb Rotation and Kink-band Migration. In this model, growth strata display some fanning of
dip due to rotation of the fold limbs as well as growth triangles that record the migration of stra- This seismic line images a detachment anticline with patterns of growth strata that reflect fold-
ta through the active synclinal axial surfaces. ing by both limb rotation and kink-band migration, suggesting that the structure is compatible
with model 3 shown above.
37
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Seismic interpretation of a detachment fold: Angola continental slope
In this section, we describe the interpretation of a detachment fold imaged in a seismic reflection profile based on the fold
models presented on the preceding pages.
Initial Observations. The fold from offshore west Africa shown at right is symmetric, with units that conserve layer thick-
ness (3) and other units that clearly do not (1, 4). There is no obvious thrust ramp present, although reflectors underlying Initial observations
the fold are essentially flat suggesting the presence of a detachment (2).
Structural Interpretation. Based on the initial observations, this structure is interpreted as a detachment fold in the sec-
tion at lower right. The detachment is interpreted to separate folded layers above from undeformed strata below. Above
the detachment, a poorly imaged stratigraphic interval is thickened in the core of the fold (1). This incompetent unit rep-
resents an Aptian salt bed. The units directly above the salt broadly conserve layer thickness (3), indicating these strata
have acted competently during deformation, probably deforming by flexural slip (see section 1A-2). The constant thickness
of the units also indicates that they were deposited prior to folding. Above these units, layers that thin onto the crest of
the fold (4) are growth strata. The growth strata generally fan above the fold limbs, with only small panels in the limbs hav-
ing the same stratigraphic thickness that they do in the synclines. Thus, the fold grew mostly by limb rotation with only
minor kink-band migration, similar to the model 1 detachment fold of Poblet and McClay (1996).
Model A shows the classic method of calculating the depth to detachment, based on the assumption that the uplift area
is equal to the displaced area. The shortening, which is typically determined by unfolding a layer while conserving line
length, and the uplift area are used to calculate the detachment depth by:
depth-to-detachment = displaced area / shortening
Model B shows a typical detachment fold where the uplift area greatly exceeds the displaced area. In these cases, stan-
dard depth-to-detachment calculations inaccurately predict detachment depths.
38
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1B-4: Shear fault-bend folds
Basic concept Seismic Example: Niger Delta
Shear fault-bend folding produces ramp anticlines with very distinctive shapes that
reflect a significant non-flexural-slip component to the deformation. The structural style
typically shows long back-limbs that dip less than the fault ramp, in contrast with clas-
sical fault-bend folding. This section describes the geometry and kinematics of shear
fault-bend folding after Suppe, Connors, and Zhang (2004) and introduces basic tech-
niques for recognizing and interpreting these structures in seismic images.
39
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Shear is the essence Shear in a seismic example: Cascadia Canada
Classical fault-bend folds (section 1B-1) deform by flexural slip of the beds as they slide over Flexural-slip unfolding of a shear fault-bend fold yields a hanging wall shape that doesn’t match the
fault bends (A), conserving layer thickness. In contrast, shear fault-bend folds undergo addi- footwall because there has been deformation in addition to flexural slip. In this example from the
tional distortion of the hanging wall or footwall, that is they undergo additional shear. This Cascadia accretionary wedge, offshore western Canada, the hanging-wall fault shape is deter-
additional shear usually is concentrated in a weak detachment interval such as shale or evap- mined by unfolding the layers while conserving line length. The difference between the unfolded
orite that deforms by bedding-parallel simple shear — like the geometric model below (B). hanging-wall fault shape and the actual fault shape yields the shear profile, showing that there has
Alternatively, shear may be more distributed as in the analog model from David Elliott (1976) been layer-parallel simple shear. The shear is concentrated in the yellow and red basal layers.
based on sheets of paper (C) or it may involve a bedding-parallel shortening and thickening,
which is called pure shear. Shear fault-bend folds can also form by some combination of pure
and simple shear or by more heterogeneous deformation as shown below in the distinct-ele-
Interpreted section
ment mechanical simulation by Luther Strayer (D).
Models
A: Classic fault-bend fold B: Shear fault-bend fold
40
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
End-member shear fault-bend folding Fold types
End-member shear fault-bend folding. We can understand the fundamentals of shear fault-bend
folding and quantitatively check our seismic interpretations by using two simple end-member theo-
ries, both involving a weak basal decollement layer of thickness h (shown in yellow). In the simple-
shear end member, the decollement layer undergoes bedding-parallel simple shear with no actual
basal fault, just a distributed zone of shear. In the pure-shear end member, the decollement layer
slides above a basal fault and shortens and thickens in a triangular area above the ramp. Mixtures
between these end members are possible, as shown at right, but many actual folds are close to the
end members. Classical fault-bend folding is also an end member, with a basal layer of zero thickness
(h = 0).
The shape of the fold shows us which stratigraphic interval is the decollement layer. The anticlinal
axial surface terminates at the top of the decollement interval at (A). The synclinal axial surface ter-
minates at the bottom (B). Also, if there is pure shear, the synclinal axial surface (C) doesn’t bisect
within the decollement layer because the latter is thickened above the ramp. These properties are
useful in seismic interpretation.
41
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Seismic interpretation of a simple shear fault-bend fold: Cascadia, Canada
Initial assessment. The structure imaged in this seismic section from
offshore western Canada (Hyndman et al., 1994) shows the character-
istics of a shear fault-bend fold, especially the steepness of the fault dip
(35-40°) relative to the back limb dip (5-13°). A front limb much nar-
rower than the back (1) is also typical of shear fault-bend folds.
Interpreting the ramp geometry. The fault picks (shown below in red)
constrain the fault geometry and rule out strongly listric fault interpre-
tations. Also, note that there is a downward dying out of the fault throw
(2), with throw going to zero at the base of the ramp (3). This is char-
acteristic of shear fault-bend folds, in contrast with classical fault-bend
folds.
Fault picks
43
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Evolution of shear fault-bend folds Relationships of backlimb dip (δb) to shear (αe and a)
Kinematic evolution. Both simple- and pure-shear fault-bend folds develop by
combinations of limb lengthening (kink-band migration) and limb rotation. The
graphs at right show the relationship between limb dip and shear for both fold
types. In the limit of large shear (i.e., displacement), the fold geometry in pre-
growth strata approaches the geometry of classical fault-bend folding, with a
back-limb dip that approaches the ramp dip (θ approaches δb). However, even
in these cases folds will grow with a component of limb rotation, recording
their shear fault-bend fold heritage.
Note that in this heterogeneous simple-shear fold that the highest shear interval
Given a constant ramp dip, the backlimb dip (δb) steepens as shear (αe and α) increases. Points A1 to A3 correspond
defines the base of the backlimb panel that most closely approaches the ramp dip.
to models presented at lower left.
Growth strata. The combination of limb rotation and limb lengthening that Large shear (displacement) fault-bend folds
occurs in shear fault-bend folding is recorded by growth strata, as illustrated in
the sequential kinematic models (A1-A3) shown below. Fanning of dips record-
ing limb rotation (1) and growth triangles recording kink-band migration (2)
(see section 1A-4). Growth strata in the example from the Niger delta at right
show evidence of limb rotation.
44
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Seismic interpretation of pure-shear fault-bend folds: Nankai trough, Japan
Initial assessment. This line shows ramp anticlines developed in overpressured
Shikoku basin turbidites above the master detachment (D) of the Nankai trough
accretionary wedge. Note that the degree of shortening in the structures increas-
es from south to north. Notice the qualitative characteristics of shear fault-bend
folds, including backlimb dips that are less than ramp dip (A). Nevertheless these
structures are more complex than the end-member models because of superposed
low-amplitude detachment folding and secondary deformation, seen in both foot-
walls and hanging walls (B).
This depth-migrated dip line passes through Ocean Drilling Project holes ODP-808
and ODP-1174, which reach to the top of oceanic crust (C) (line NT62-8 Moore et
al., 1990, 1991, 2002). The 19-meter-thick master detachment was cored in ODP-808
just above transparent pelagic sediments of the Shikoku basin (D).
45
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Refining the seismic interpretation: Nankai trough, Japan
Strategy. We can test our qualitative interpretation by comparing the seismic geom- Picking the fault
etry with the end-member theories.
Pure-shear end member
Fault and limb geometry. In the seismic section shown at upper right, the fault-
ramp is located based on reflector terminations shown as red arrows and by core
from the ODP-808 hole (1). This gives a remarkably straight ramp, dipping at θ = 35°,
which is much greater than the average dip of the irregular backlimb (δb = 11-13°),
suggesting that this is a shear fault-bend fold. The back syncline in the strong reflec-
tors (2) is displaced substantially to the hinterland of the base of the ramp, which
favors pure-shear or mixed-shear models that we now test.
Comparing with the end-member theory. Plotting the backlimb dip δb = 13° and
ramp dip θ = 35° on the pure-shear graph at far right (3) predicts a back synclinal dip
ψ = 31° in the basal decollement layer, which quantitatively agrees with the seismic Comparing the seismic with an
image at right. In theory, the location of the top of the decollement layer (in orange) end-member model
is at the inflection in the back syncline, which agrees with the location indicated
independently by the fault cutoff of the back anticline (4) — supporting our pure-
shear fault-bend fold interpretation. A complete interpretation is shown on the seis-
mic image at lower right (see also Suppe et al., 2004).
Fault slip. The back-dip and ramp angles plotted on the graph (3) also give us the
shear α = 69° of the basal layer. From this we can calculate the fault slip d = 390 m,
based on a basal layer thickness h of about 230 m (tan α = d/h = 1.7).
46
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1B-5: Imbricate fault-bend folds
Basic concept Seismic Example: Alberta Foothills, Canada
Imbricate structures form by the stacking of two or more thrust sheets and are common in fold
and thrust belts worldwide. Imbricate structures can form by break-forward propagation of thrust
sheets, by break-backward thrusting, or with coeval motion on both deep and shallow faults. In this
section, we describe the basic characteristics of imbricate structures, and outline an approach to
interpret these structures in seismic profiles using imbricate fault-bend fold theory (Suppe, 1983;
Shaw et al., 1999).
Break-forward imbricate Break-backward imbricate
Kinematic Models
Imbricate structures develop where two or more thrust sheets are stacked vertically. These thrust
faults may or may not involve detachments, but imbricate structures are more common in regions
with detachments. In the sequential break-forward model (0–2) shown above, slip on the deep
thrust fault produces a fault-bend fold that refolds the overlying thrust sheet. In the sequential
break-backward model (0–2), a pre-existing fault-bend fold is cut by a shallow, younger thrust ramp.
Common characteristics
Imbricate fault-bend folds typically contain:
1) Two or more vertically stacked thrust ramps;
2) Bedding dips that change across thrust ramps; and
3) Fold limbs at high structural levels with multiple
dip domains, reflecting refolding caused by multiple ramps.
(Note: multiple dip domains may also be produced by
multi-bend fault-bend folds, see section 1B-1). These seismic sections show the three common characteristics described in the model
at left, including (1) multiple ramps, (2) changes in bedding dip across ramps, and (3)
multiple dip domains in fold limbs
47
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Interpreting break-forward imbricate structures using fault-bend fold theory
Suppe (1983) presents a strategy for interpreting break-forward imbricate structures based on the Dip values measured on seismic profile
fact that each lower imbricate increases the dips in the overlying imbricates by fixed or quantum
amounts that are predictable using fault-bend fold theory. Here we assume that bed-length and
thickness are conserved and that all faults step up from a detachment at the same initial step-up
angle (ramp dip). This section describes how to implement this approach to interpret imbricate
structures imaged in seismic sections.
Theory
Imbricate fault-bend fold theory describes the increas-
es in dip order caused by refolding of shallow thrust
sheets by younger and deeper faults. In model 0, with a
single thrust ramp A, the forelimb and backlimb dip val-
ues are first order (-I and +I), because each limb was
formed by strata passing over a single fault bend.
Incipient thrust B is shown in the footwall of thrust A. In
model 1, slip on fault B refolds the shallow thrust sheet,
producing second order (-II and +II) dip panels. These Two backlimb dip values are observed in this seismic section near the well. The lesser value (-I = 13°)
second order panels were folded once by thrust A, and occurs between faults A and B, and in the hanging wall of fault A to the right of the well. The steeper
again by thrust B. The dips of the forelimb and backlimb value (-II = 25°) is restricted to the hanging wall of fault A. These two backlimb dip values are com-
pared with the values shown in the table at lower left, to determine if they are consistent with imbri-
panels (-I, +I, -II, and +II) are prescribed by fault-bend cate fault-bend fold theory.
fold theory based on the initial cutoff angles (θ).
Interpreted section
Forelimb and backlimb dip values are based on the initial cutoff angle (θ) and the number of imbri-
cated thrusts. This table shows the prescribed forelimb and backlimb dips for first- through sev-
enth-order (I-VII) panels based on 8 to 24° fundamental cutoff angles. The order of the dip panel (I-
VII) generally corresponds to the number of imbricated faults.
The two backlimb dip values (-I = 13° and -II = 25°) correspond to a 13°initial cutoff angle based on the
Dip panels are typically measured on seismic sections, and then compared with rows of prescribed table at left (see row highlighted in yellow). Thus, the geometries of faults A and B can be interpreted
values. If a general match between observed and prescribed dip values is obtained, then the struc- as part of a break-forward thrust sequence. The lower fault (B) dips at 13°, corresponding to the pre-
ture can be interpreted using this table. If a match is not obtained, it may suggest that the initial scribed initial cutoff angle. It shallows to upper and lower detachments based on simple fault-bend
cutoff angles of the ramps are not equal, requiring use of values different that those on this table fold theory (see section 1B-1) with θ = φ = 13°. The upper fault (A) dips at the second-order value (-II
= 25°) where it lies above the backlimb kink band formed by fault B. Where fault A extends beyond the
(see Mount et al., 1990). These more complex situations can be interpreted using the folding vec-
underlying backlimb kink band, it dips at -I = 13°, corresponding to the prescribed initial cutoff angle.
tor technique presented on the next page. The geometries prescribed by the table match the reflection patterns closely. Note, however, that
other faults in the section further complicate some aspects of the geometry.
48
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Interpreting break-forward imbricate structures using folding vectors
Here we describe a method of interpreting break-forward imbricate structures using folding vectors
(Shaw et al., 1999). This method can be applied to a wide range of structures, including imbricate Measuring a folding vector
systems where initial cutoff angles of faults vary, bed thickness changes occur, or faults do not sole
to detachments. Folding vectors describe the relative displacement of bedding or other surfaces, The folding vector method is used to
such as faults, across a fold limb or kink band. Thus, folding vectors can be used to describe the interpret this seismic section, in which
refolding of overlying thrust sheets due to imbrication. In this section, we describe how to deter- fault A is refolded by an underlying
mine folding vectors and use them to interpret a break-forward imbricate structure imaged in a kink band bounded by axial surface S⬘.
seismic section. Fault A enters the left side of the kink
band at a dip of 22°. The folding vector
U is measured as the deflection of a
Using folding vectors bed* across axial surface S⬘ in the foot-
To describe how folding vectors are used to interpret break-for- wall of fault A.
ward imbricate structures, we will consider the case of a shal-
low thrust sheet (above fault A) being refolded by a deeper
thrust (B). In model 1, slip on the deep thrust B has produced *Note that folding vectors must be mea-
a backlimb kink band that must refold the overlying thrust sured parallel to, but not necessarily along,
sheet (A). Hence, the orientation of fault A, and beds in its hang- axial surfaces. In this case, the paired
ing wall, will change as the thrust sheet passes over the under- axial surface corresponding to S⬘ is located
lying kink band. In model 2, the deflection of bedding across the off the right side of the section, so the fold-
ing vector is measured at an arbitrary
deep kink band is used to determine the folding vector (U).
point in the direction parallel to axial sur-
Folding vectors are measured parallel to axial surface orienta-
face S⬘.
tions. The deflection of thrust A across the deep kink band is
described by vector X, which is equal to the folding vector U. Interpreting a folded thrust
This results in shear, and hence line length, being preserved
parallel to the axial surface orientation. The orientation of bed-
ding that is refolded in the hanging wall of fault A can be deter-
mined using fault-bend fold theory (see section 1B-1), or by
using folding vectors as shown in model 3. However, in this
The folding vector U is then used to
(and perhaps many) cases, the axial surface orientation
predict the deflection of the fault (A)
changes between the footwall and hanging wall of fault A
across the kink band (U = X). The pre-
because bed dips change. Thus, the new hanging wall axial sur-
dicted fault position is consistent with
face orientation must be used to measure a new folding vector
reflection terminations that appear to
(Y), which is equal to the deflection of fault A. This folding vec-
represent fault cutoffs. Moreover, the
tor, in turn, equals the deflection of bedding in the hanging wall
folded fault dips about 30°, roughly par-
of fault A that is described by vector Z.
allel to beds in the overlying kink band
(T-T⬘).
This method also applies in cases where axial surfaces do not
bisect interlimb angles, and thus bed thickness is not pre-
served. In all cases, however, proper use of folding vectors
results in area-balanced interpretations.
Note: This method can also be used to model the folding of angular
unconformities, sedimentary growth wedges, and other cases where
bed dips within a kink band are not parallel.
49
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Recognizing break-back thrusting
This section describes fault and fold patterns that are common in break-backward imbricate structures, and shows examples in seismic sections.
Patterns of fault cutting older fold limbs Patterns of break-backward thrusting in seismic data
To describe structural patterns common in break-back imbricate structures, we will consider some These seismic sections show patterns that reflect thrusting sequence. In section A,
simple patterns for a shallow, break-backward thrust ramp (model A1) and detachment (model A2) axial surface S terminates upward into a thrust that is overlain by gently dipping stra-
cutting across a fold limb (S-S’) related to an older and deeper thrust. The shallow thrust ramp may ta. This pattern is comparable to that shown in model B1 (at left) and reflects break-
cut across and offset a part of the fold limb without changing fault orientation (model B1). back thrusting. In sections B and C, axial surfaces S’ are offset by shallow thrust faults.
Alternatively, the shallow thrust could change its orientation across the fold limb, offsetting and These patterns are comparable to model C2 (at left) and are consistent with break-
refolding parts of the structure (model C1). In the case of model C1, note that the deep folding vec- backward or coeval, but not break-forward, thrusting.
tor (U) need not equal the deflection of the break-backward thrust (X), in contrast to the break-for-
ward example described on the previous page. In the case of the detachment, the shallow fault
could follow bedding planes across the fold limb (model B2). Based on fault-bend fold theory
(Suppe, 1983), slip on this shallow detachment would not modify the fold shape. Alternatively, the B: Peruvian Andes
shallow detachment could follow bedding across the fold limb but cut up section beyond the fold
(model C2). In this case the shallow fault conforms to one axial surface and offsets the other.
A: Permian Basin, Texas, U.S.A.
C: La Puna, Argentina
A: Break-forward thrusting
These seismic sections both image two faults (X and Y) that are sepa-
rated horizontally at shallow levels, but vertically overlap one another
at depth. In section A, the fold associated with fault Y does not deform,
and thus pre-dates, the annotated horizon. The fold related to fault X
clearly deforms, and thus post-dates this horizon, reflecting a break-
forward thrusting sequence. In section B, the fold associated with fault
X does not deform, and thus pre-dates, the annotated horizon. The fold
related to fault Y clearly deforms, and thus post-dates, this horizon,
reflecting a break-backward thrusting sequence. Both seismic images
are from the deepwater Niger Delta, Nigeria.
B: Break-back thrusting
51
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
1B-6: Structural wedges Examples Field Example
Basic concept
Structural wedges contain two connected fault segments that bound a triangular, or wedge-
shaped fault block. The two fault segments, which typically include two ramps or one ramp and
one detachment, merge at the tip of the wedge. Slip on both faults accommodates propagation
of the wedge tip and causes folding (Medwedeff, 1989). Wedges occur at a variety of scales. At
large scales associated with mountain fronts, wedges are typically referred to as triangle zones
(Gordy et al., 1975). In this section, we describe common types of wedges and illustrate how
these structures are interpreted in seismic sections.
(above left) Brittle failure of rocks in compression commonly leads to the development of two conjugate
thrust faults that dip in opposite directions (Anderson, 1942). Planes of weakness, such as bedding, can
also lead to the development of detachments. In cross section (above right), two conjugate thrusts
bound a wedge-shaped fault block and merge at the wedge tip (model 0). Slip on both bounding faults
causing propagation of the wedge (model 1). In this case, the wedge propagates along a detachment, and
causes folding of the hanging wall block. The lower thrust is commonly referred to as the forethrust or
sole thrust, and the upper thrust is called the back thrust or roof thrust (Boyer and Elliot, 1982).
Common characteristics
Wedges exhibit a wide range of geometries.
However, several characteristics are common
to most wedge structure, including: This seismic section images a large structural wedge, or triangle zone, at the eastern front of the
1) presence of coeval fore- and back-thrusts; Canadian Rocky Mountain fold and thrust belt. The common characteristics of structural wedges,
(1–3) as described at left, are present in this structure. Note that a second, smaller back thrust is
2) folding localized along an active axial sur- present within the main wedge block.
face pinned to the wedge tip; and
When the back or roof thrust and its hanging wall are gently tilted or warped, but not deformed to
3) folds may exist in the footwall of the back the extent exhibited within the wedge block, the term passive roof thrust is sometimes used. Passive
thrust that produce structural relief. roof thrusts are common in triangle zones, as shown in this example.
52
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Wedge models developed using fault-bend fold theory
Structural wedges exhibit a variety of shapes and styles that reflect initial fault geometries, propagation direction, and folding mechanisms. In this section, we present a series of kinematic models that
describe basic types of structural wedges governed by fault-bend fold theory (Suppe, 1983; Medwedeff, 1989; see section 1B-1). Models A through C involve detachments, whereas model D does not.
A (0–2): Simple wedge with a detachment and B (0–2): Wedge with a lower forethrust ramp C (0–2): Wedge formed by a dipping forethrust D (0–2): Wedge formed by a dipping forethrust
back thrust. Propagation of the wedge tip forms and an upper detachment that acts as the back and back thrust. With slip, the wedge tip propa- and back thrust. With slip, the wedge tip prop-
a kink band above the back thrust that is bound- thrust. With slip, the wedge tip propagates gates along a detachment surface. Strata within agates along the trajectory of the forethrust.
ed by an active axial surface, which is pinned to along the detachment surface. Strata within the wedge are folded in an anticlinal fault-bend Strata within the wedge are not folded, as they
the wedge tip. Strata in the kink band are paral- the wedge are folded in an anticlinal fault-bend fold that deforms the back thrust. A kink band do not pass over a fault bend. A kink band
lel to the back thrust (β = 0) because the fault fold that deforms the detachment or back develops above the back thrust with strata that
develops above the back thrust with strata
rises from a detachment (θ = 0). thrust. A kink band develops above the back are parallel to the underlying fault, but that dip
thrust with strata that are parallel to the more steeply than the beds within the wedge that dip more steeply than the fault. The geom-
underlying fault and fault-bend fold. The syn- block. Both the synclinal axial surface pinned to etry of the kink band (θ) is governed by fault-
clinal axial surface pinned to the wedge tip is the wedge tip and the anticlinal axial surface bend fold theory (see section 1B-1), with
active, as is the anticlinal axial surface within pinned to the fault bends are active. The anti- equal to the acute angle between the back
the wedge block. The anticlinal axial surface clinal axial surface in the hanging wall of the thrust and the propagation direction, and β as
above the back thrust, however, is inactive. back thrust is active (in contrast to model B) the hanging wall cutoff angle relative to the
because a small amount of strata is folded from propagation direction.
the crest into limb, thus passing through the
axial surface. These kinematics facilitate the
Note that in this wedge the roof thrust locally
conservation of bed length. Alternatively, a
Note: green dashed lines are active axial surfaces, cuts down the stratigraphic section as it
small amount of shear or bed-parallel extension
red dashed lines are inactive axial surfaces. See extends upward. This is an unusual relation-
could accommodate fault slip without moving
section 1B-1 for description. ship for thrust faults, but nevertheless may
strata from the fold crest into the limb.
occur in non-decollement wedges.
53
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Seismic examples of structural wedges
Here we present examples of structural wedges imaged in seismic reflection data.
54
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
Growth structure in wedges
This section describes growth structures above wedges that are modeled using fault-bend fold theory, after
Medwedeff (1989). Growth structures can be very helpful in distinguishing structural wedges from other
types of fault-related folds.
Seismic Example: Sumatra, Indonesia
Kinematic models
Wedges Forelimb fault-bend folds
Interpreted section
In wedges that are governed by fault-bend fold theory (see section 1B-1), folds grow by kink-band migration.
Folding generally occurs along an active axial surface that is pinned to the propagating wedge tip. In cases
where sedimentation rate exceeds uplift rate, syntectonic strata form growth triangles above the wedge tip
that are bounded by a planar synclinal (active) axial surface and a curved anticlinal (inactive) axial surface
(model W1). In contrast, simple forelimb fault-bend folds have growth triangles bound by a curved synclinal
(inactive) axial surface and a planar anticlinal (active) axial surface (model F1). In cases where uplift rate
exceeds sedimentation rate, the contrast between wedges and simple fault-bend folds is even more distinct.
In a structural wedge, growth strata are folded about an active synclinal axial surface and are parallel to the
underlying forelimb dip (model W2). In contrast, syntectonic strata are not folded above the forelimb of a
simple fault-bend fold (model F2), because they have not passed through an active axial surface. Growth stra-
ta, therefore, are horizontal, or maintain a primary sedimentary dip, and onlap the forelimb.
(right) This seismic section images a structure with characteristics of a growth wedge. The structure con-
sists of a forelimb developed above a south-dipping forethrust. Growth strata thin onto the crest of the struc-
ture, and are folded above the forelimb. The synclinal axial surface is roughly planar and folds the growth
strata. In contrast, the anticlinal axial surface is curved, with an abrupt change in orientation at the contact
between pre-growth and growth strata. Based on this growth pattern, which is similar to model W1 above,
the structure is interpreted as a wedge. (For more details on this interpretation, see Shaw and Brennan, sec-
tion 2-23, this volume).
55
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Shear fault-bend fold wedges Seismic example: Niger Delta, Nigeria
Structural wedges can form with non-flexural-slip components of deforma-
tion, resulting in fold geometries that differ from those presented on the
previous pages. Here, we describe a class of these wedges that form by
shear fault-bend folding (Suppe et al., 2004; see section 1B-4), and show an
example in a seismic section.
Kinematic models
56
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
1B-7: Interference structures Seismic Example: Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Basic concept
Interference structures form when two or more monoclinal kink bands intersect, often yielding distinctive pat-
terns in cross section with anticlines perched above synclines. Interference structures have been documented in
the field and laboratory (e.g., Dewey, 1965; Paterson and Weiss, 1966; Stewart and Alvarez, 1991), and have been
proposed as the origin of structures imaged in seismic profiles (e.g., Mount, 1989; Novoa et al., 1998; Camerlo et
al., section 2-24, this volume). In this section, we describe a simple style of interference structure comprised of
two kink bands with opposing dips, and present examples of these structures imaged in seismic sections.
Kinematic Models
These models (A and B) illustrate interference structures formed by the intersection of two kink bands (1 and 2) that dip
in opposite directions. Model A forms by clockwise shear of the through-going kink band (2), whereas model B forms by
counter-clockwise shear of the through-going kink band (1). In both models the through-going kink band separates the other
kink band into two pieces that are joined along two shear surfaces that are parallel to bedding. As a result, the shear sur-
faces connect points where the axial surfaces bifurcate. The axial surfaces in these models bisect the interlimb angles (see
section 1A-1), and thus bed length and thickness are preserved. The most distinctive aspect of these structures is that they
yield anticlines perched above synclines.
This seismic section images an interference structure from the Perdido fold and thrust
Kink-band interference can result from many different structural configurations, involving various types of fault-related belt (after Mount, 1989; Novoa et al., 1998). The structure is comprised of two mono-
folds (Mount, 1989; Medwedeff and Suppe, 1997; Novoa et al., 1998). These three models (C–E) illustrate general struc- clinal kink bands that intersect at about 5.2 seconds (TWTT). The interfering kink
tural configurations that can yield kink-band interference. The interfering kink bands are developed: C) above two bends bands produce an anticline that is perched above a syncline, similar to the models
in the same fault; D) by imbrication of two faults; and E) as forelimbs developed above faults that dip in opposite direc- shown at left. The sense of shear in the interference structure appears to be counter-
tions. Note that the shallow fold geometries are identical in each of these models. Thus, the geometries of interference clockwise, similar to model B. This section is displayed in TWTT, with a V.E. of about
folds are not always diagnostic of the underlying fault configurations. The different structural configurations do, howev- 1:1 for a velocity of 2000 m/s, which is representative of the shallow section.
er, involve different patterns of active (green) and inactive (red) axial surfaces, which may, in some cases, be distin-
guished using growth structures (Novoa et al., 1998; see section 1A-3).
57
Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
Complex interference structure
Interference structures that are faulted and/or involve more than two kink bands may have very complex geometries. In this section, we describe a complex, faulted interference structure imaged
in a seismic section. We use a partial restoration of the structure to document its origins as an interference fold.
The seismic profile shown in panel A images a A: Uninterpreted section C: Geologic section
complex fold from the Sichuan basin, China. The
structure exhibits the basic pattern of an anticline
perched over a syncline that is characteristic of
interference structures. The structures differ from
the simple models shown on the previous page,
however, in that the core of the fold is cut by a
thrust. A narrow monocline appears to be offset
by this fault.
58
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 1: Structural Interpretation Methods
2
Case
Studies
59
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-1: Pitas Point Anticline, California, U.S.A.
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Stephen C. Hook, Texaco Inc., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
John Suppe, Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Location: Eastern Santa Barbara Channel, California, U.S.A. Pitas Point anticline
Topics: Fault-bend folding, growth structure, map patterns
Reserves: Gas in Pliocene clastic reservoirs
Figure 1: Map of fold trends in the eastern Santa Barbara Channel, California, showing locations
of the Pitas Point trend and seismic profile shown in Figure 2. RT = Rincon trend; ORT = offshore
Figure 2: Post-stack, time-migrated, and depth converted 3-D seismic reflection profile across the Pitas Point trend, with formation tops and dipmeter from the Texaco 234 #7 well. Downward
Oak Ridge trend; ORF = Oak Ridge fault; MCT = Mid-Channel (Blue Bottle) trend.
terminating kink bands (2) indicate a detachment at about 5 km depth (see section 1A-2, Recognizing thrust and reverse faults). Shallow gas sag is documented by Mastoris (1990).
60
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-1: Seismic interpretation Pitas Point anticline
We propose a simple growth fault-bend fold model (Figure 3)
and interpretation (Figure 4) to describe the geometry and
kinematic evolution of the Pitas Point anticline.
1 growth
pre-growth
Figure 7: Axial surface map at the top of the Pliocene Repetto Formation, superimposed on a structure contour map of the same horizon that was generated independently
from well control. The plunge of the fold is reflected by pairs of axial surfaces (A-Aand B-B) that converge toward the fold terminations. In the center of the trend, the forelimb
axial surfaces (B-B) are deflected southward. This pattern is consistent with the crestal uplift stage of growth (Figure 6) in the center of the trend and along section X-X. For a
more detailed discussion of the map pattern, see Shaw et al. (1994).
Figure 5: Perspective view of a plunging fault-bend fold. (top): Between sections 3 and 2, fault slip is greater than
the ramp width and the fold is in the crestal broadening stage. As slip decreases to the right of section 2, the fold
enters the crestal uplift stage. Fold plunge is denoted by converging pairs of axial surfaces. (bottom): Axial surfaces
are mapped by projecting their intersections with the mapped horizon vertically to a horizontal datum.
Figure 8: Enlarged (2X) portion of the axial surface map superimposed on a time slice (2.3s TWTT) from the 3-D seismic survey. Note that in the zone of crestal broadening
the trend of axial surfaces B and B are parallel to the seismic reflections in the forelimb. The wide fold crest is imaged as a broad negative (white) amplitude surrounding plat-
form Habitat.
Conclusions:
• The Pitas Point anticline is a south-vergent, fault-bend fold developed above a thrust ramp and detachment
Figure 6: The axial surface map pattern of a doubly plunging fault-bend fold is characterized by pairs of axial within the Miocene Monterey Formation. Maximum slip on the fault is about 3.5 km.
surfaces that converge at the fold terminations. The zone where the fold is in the crestal broadening stage is • Upper Pliocene and Quaternary strata are syntectonic units folded by displacement on the thrust.
defined by the deflection of the forelimb kink band (B-B) away from the backlimb kink band (A-A), yielding a
wider fold crest.
• The fold is in the crestal broadening stage of growth in the center of the trend beneath platform Habitat.
62
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-2: Toldado Anticline, Upper Magdalena, Colombia
Alexis Rosero, HOCOL S.A., Bogota, Colombia
Juan Carlos Ramon, HOCOL S.A., Bogota, Colombia
Location: Upper Magdalena basin, Tolima, Colombia Avechucos Syncline / Toldado oilfield
Topics: Fault-bend folding, growth strata
Reserves: Oil in the Albian Caballos sandstones
The Toldado anticline is part of the buried NNE trending
Ortega fold and thrust belt (Figure 1). This belt is located
below and to the west of the Avechucos syncline. The
Toldado anticline is a NNE-SSW-trending anticline with a
wide, low-angle crest separating gently east- and west-dip-
ping limbs (Figure 2). The structure is interpreted as a fault-
bend fold. Two models are geometrically possible based on
the fold shape (in Cretaceous strata) and partially con-
strained fault geometries (Figures 3 and 4). The geometry of
growth strata is used to constrain the degree of fold evolu-
tion and to distinguish the structural interpretation. The
near-horizontal growth strata (Paleocene) across the fold
crest indicates that the fold is on the Crestal Uplift Stage (see
Shaw et al., section 2-1, this volume). Paleocene growth stra-
ta gets thinner along the crest of the fold. This is partly due
to variable uplift over the fold and partly due to erosion on
the Eocene unconformity. These data indicate that sedimen-
tation rate during the Paleocene was close to, or slightly
higher than, the uplifting rate.
Figure 1: Location map of the Toldado anticline, showing the main structural features of the Figure 2: Post-stack, time-migrated, 2-D seismic reflection profile across the Toldado anticline. The line is in TWT but is displayed in 1:1 scale using the velocity function of the Toldado-3 well.
study area. Note that the Toldado anticline is located close to the trace of the Avechucos syn- Toldado-3 well and formation tops are shown. Note thinning of Paleocene growth strata (1) across the fold crest. Minor erosion occurs along the crest of the fold associated with the Eocene uncon-
cline. Location of the seismic line on Figure 2 is shown. formity. The forelimb downward termination (2) defines an intra-Villeta detachment.
63
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-2: Toldado Anticline
In this interpretation (#1) we consider that the upper detachment is parallel to strata in its foot- The resulting interpretation implies that the fault-bend fold is in the crestal broadening stage. The
wall and the top of the ramp is located at the base of axial surface A. We observe a forelimb cut- models presented by Shaw et al. (section 2-1, this volume) show that at this stage there should
off angle (β) of 32°. However, before this value is used to calculate the ramp dip, the forelimb must be dipping growing-strata on top of horizontal crestal beds (see Figure 3, insert). The seismic
be “unfolded” across the 8° bend in the upper detachment (φ). Using fault-bend fold theory, we does not support this geometry and thus this model is discarded.
obtain a 35° dip of the forelimb before it was folded across the bend in the detachment. This value
serves as the forelimb cut-off angle (β = 35°) that, along with the “unfolded” inter limb angle ( γ
0 0
= 74°) is used to calculate the change in fault dip (φ = 23°) an initial cut-off angle of the ramp (θ =
26°). This yields a 30° dipping ramp.
dipping over
horizontal strata
64
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-2: Toldado Anticline
In this interpretation (#2) we use the observed forelimb hanging Note that in this interpretation the shortening and slip is small- In conclusion, based on fault and pre-growth fold geometries,
wall cutoff angle, (β = 32°), the dip of the upper detachment (13° er than in interpretation #1, and that the axial surface (A) is not two structural models are possible for the Toldado anticline.
SE) and the forelimb interlimb angle (γ = 79.5°) to predict the fixed to the top of the ramp (where the ramp meets the upper Growth strata are used to distinguish between these alternative
change in fault dip (φ), the initial cutoff angle (θ), and the slip detachment). This implies that this fold is on the crestal uplift models, and support our interpretation of the Toldado anticline
ratio (R). Using the anticlinal fault bend fold graphs (see section stage (Suppe, 1983; Shaw et al., 1999). In this case, the horizon- as a fault-bend fold in the crestal uplift stage of growth.
1B-1) we derive a φ value of about 16°. With this angle, we obtain tal growth strata seen on the seismic above the fold crest agrees
an initial cutoff angle of about 27°. The slip ratio R is calculated with the crestal uplift model (see insert), making this second
as 0.85. This agrees with the slip ratio (S1/S0) measured on the interpretation more plausible than the previous one.
seismic section.
65
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-3: Sequatchie Anticline, Tennessee, U.S.A.:
A small displacement fault-bend fold
Shankar Mitra, University of Oklahoma, The Sequatchie anticline (Figures 1 and 2) is the frontal structure of the Southern Appalachian thrust belt
Norman, Oklahoma U.S.A. in southern Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama. An interpretation of the northern part of the structure in
Cumberland and Rhea counties, Tennessee, is presented based on surface data, a seismic profile, and data
from the ARCO-Ladd #1 well. The structure has a low relief and exposes Mississippian to Pennsylvanian
Location: Appalachian Plateau, Tennessee, U.S.A. units on the crest of the structure (Figure 1). Farther south, the relief increases, and Middle Ordovician to
Topics: Fault-bend fold, multiple-bend ramp Devonian units are exposed at the surface (Hardeman, 1966; Harris and Milici, 1977).
Figure 1: Generalized geological map of the Sequatchie anticline in Cumberland and Rhea Counties,
Tennessee (modified from Hardeman, 1966), showing the location of the seismic profile shown in Figures 2
and 3. Omu-S = Middle to Upper Ordovician and Silurian. D-M = Devonian to Mississippian. Pg-Pco =
Pennsylvanian Gizzard Group and Crab Orchard Mountains Group. Pl = Lower Pennsylvanian units above Figure 2: Part of time-migrated seismic profile through the Sequatchie anticline, Tennessee.
the Crab Orchard Mountains Group.
66
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-3: Sequatchie Anticline
Seismic interpretation is based on both a time-section (Figure The Sequatchie anticline is interpreted to be a low-displace- The seismic data show a low westward dip of the basement
2), and a post-stack depth migration (Figure 3), based on a ment fault-bend fold, related to a multi-bend ramp (Figure 4a). between shot points 390 and 485, and a steeper eastward dip
velocity model constructed from a preliminary depth model. There are four bends in the fault, each of which defines an between shot points 390 and 325. This geometry is partly due to
The structure is related to a thrust fault that originates at the active axial plane. Movement of the hanging wall over the fault a seismic pull-up under high velocity carbonates in the hanging
base of the Cambrian Rome Formation, and climbs to the base bends results in the development of a series of passive axial sur- wall of the Sequatchie thrust, which was apparently uncorrect-
of the Pennsylvanian Gizzard Group. The seismic data, and the faces, which originate at the active axial surfaces and migrate ed in the depth model used for the post-stack depth migration.
ARCO Ladd #1 well indicate that the fault has a low dip (approx- away from them. The active and and passive axial surfaces sep- However, there appears to be a very low-dipping eastward ramp
imately 5°) in the Cambrian Rome and Conasauga Formations, arate panels of relatively constant dip, which can be identified under the Sequatchie thrust, which drops all units down to the
but has a much steeper dip (15°) in the Cambro-Ordovician from surface and seismic data, and from the dipmeter data in east. The presence of the ramp is also indicated by dipmeter
Knox Group and the remaining Ordovician to Devonian units. the ARCO-Ladd #1 well. data in the footwall. This ramp may have formed along a zone of
The steeper fault dip in the Knox Formation is probably related weakness in the basement during loading associated with the
to the higher competence of this unit. Surface data suggest that emplacement of Valley and Ridge thrusts. The formation of the
the front limb of the structure has a very steep dip, ranging from Sequatchie thrust fault may have been influenced by the loca-
30 to 85°. tion of this ramp.
DATUM =
1100 feet
DATUM =
1100 feet
Figure 3: Uninterpreted (a) and interpreted (b) time-migrated sections through the Sequatchie anticline. Active axial surfaces are
shown in green, and passive axial surfaces in orange. The seismic section and the interpretation do not correlate 1:1 with the structural
cross section because of crooked line effects.
67
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-3: Sequatchie Anticline
The cross section presented below (Figure 4a) is based on the Rome Formation to 4500 ft at the top of the Knox Group and This inclined shear profile and proposed penetrative deforma-
seismic interpretation and was restored using line-length bal- 2200 ft at the top of the Mississippian units. The forward shear tion is consistent with the steep front limb of the fold, and the
ancing (Figure 4b). The restoration shows that the shortening of the loose line in the restored section suggests a small amount small fault displacement in the Mississippian units.
for the base of the Rome Formation is approximately 5100 ft. of differential penetrative strain at the mesoscopic and
The fault displacement decreases from 5100 ft at the base of the microscopic scales within the Silurian to Mississippian units.
ARCO-LADD #1
JEWETT HEIRS
Figure 4: Structural cross section through the Sequatchie anticline, Tennessee, based on seismic data (Figure 2), surface data, and data from the ARCO-Ladd #1
Jewett Heirs well. Active axial surfaces are shown in green and passive axial surfaces in orange. b. Line-length restoration of the structural cross section in a.
68
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-4: El Furrial Field cross section, Eastern Basin, Venezuela
Enrique Novoa, Departamento de Analisis Exploratorio Integrado, Gerencia de Exploracion y Produccion, PDVSA-INTEVEP, Venezuela
László Benkovics, Departamento de Analisis Exploratorio Integrado, Gerencia de Exploracion y Produccion, PDVSA-INTEVEP, Venezuela
Claudia Fintina, Departamento de Analisis Exploratorio Integrado, Gerencia de Exploracion y Produccion, PDVSA-INTEVEP, Venezuela
Javier De Mena, Departamento de Delineacion y Caracterizacion de Yacimientos, Gerencia de Exploracion y Produccion, PDVSA-INTEVEP, Venezuela
Figure 2: A depth-migrated 3-D seismic reflection profile that images El Furrial structure. Notice that the image deteriorates between X and X. The blue
ticks show the top of Oligocene picks in the wells. Profile provided by PDVSA E&P.
Figure 1: El Furrial trend (B) is located in the Eastern Basin of Venezuela (A).
69
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-4: El Furrial Field cross section El Furrial Oil Field
A balanced cross section across El Furrial field is shown in Figure
3. The structure is characterized by a very narrow forelimb and
wide backlimb. The backlimb is made of two inclined dip domains
(A-C and C-C). The kink band A-C dips 27° NW and C-C dips 12°
NW. The forelimb is composed of a dip domain (B-B) that dips 20°
SE. The kink bands A-C and C-C are parallel to the fault plane. El
Furrial fold started to grow in the early-to-middle Miocene as
shown by a growth triangle (Suppe et al., 1992) in the sequence of
this age interpreted on top of the kink band B-B. This observation
is supported by geochemical data which show biodegradation of
oil (Talukdar et al., 1987). Presumably, this early oil was accumu-
lated when the reservoir was at shallow depth during an early
stage of fold development. Normal faults have been interpreted in
both the hanging wall and footwall. These normal faults may be
related to the development of the foreland basin in front of the
fold belt. A kinematic model (Figure 4) shows the evolution of the
Furrial Fold through time.
Figure 3: A balanced, retrodeformable cross section (X-X)across El Furrial Trend that integrates seismic reflection (Figure 2) and well data. El Furrial trend develops above a two-bend
thrust fault, which causes a very wide backlimb and a narrow forelimb. The steeper portion of the thrust fault is short and the gentle part is very long. The backlimb is interpreted to be
composed of two inclined dip domains (A-C and C-C) which are parallel to the El Furrial fault. On the other hand, the forelimb is composed of a single inclined dip domain (B-B). The
seismic data illuminate the kink bands B-B and C-C very well, however the dip panels A-C and C-A are not well defined by the data. Notice the growth axial surface (G) on top of the
kink band B-B which shows a growth triangle in the early-middle Miocene sequence. This structural trend accommodates around 14 km of total slip.
Figure 4: A balanced, kinematic model of development of the El Furrial trend. a: Incipient fault and
Conclusions:
active axial surfaces (A and B) in undeformed strata. b: Slip on the two-bend thrust fault generates • El Furrial field is located within a very asymmetric fault-bend fold where the backlimb is much wider than the forelimb.
inactive axial surfaces A and Bthat are rigidly translated away from active axial surfaces A and B. • Growth strata and geochemical data suggest that it started to grow during early-middle Miocene times.
Once axial surface A arrives at the convex bend of the fault, an incipient active surface (C) is generat-
ed. Moreover, axial surfaces A, B, and B become inactive and will be rigidly translated along the
• The fault plane has two bends and is divided into two sections: a narrow, steep ramp and a long, more gentle ramp.
upper portion of the thrust fault. c: Additional slip on the fault causes the development of an inactive • The fault accommodates about 14 km of shortening.
axial surface Cand the kink band C-Cstarts to grow until the present geometry is reached. Similar
kinematic models for multibend faults are shown by Medwedeff and Suppe (1997).
70
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-5: Rosario Field, Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela
Ted Apotria, ExxonMobil Development Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
M. Scott Wilkerson, Department of Geology and Geography, DePauw University, Greencastle, Indiana, U.S.A.
Generalized stratigraphy of the western Maracaibo Basin is primary geometric elements are best imaged. Two high- reflections bound a total carbonate section that is about 547 m
summarized in Figure 2. Interpretation of the Rosario structure impedance and continuous reflections mark the top and bottom thick in the CR-12 well (Figure 3C). The Tertiary section consists
is constrained by 2-D time-migrated, 1985- and 1990-vintage of the carbonate section (Figure 3A, B). The first reflection of alternating sands, silts, and shales and exhibits parallel fold-
seismic lines (Figure 3). Interpretations from these lines were occurs between the Colon Shale and the top of the carbonates, ing. The Cretaceous Colon Shale normally has a thickness of
converted to depth (e.g., Figure 4) using interval velocities cal- and marks the mechanical transition between the “stiff” unit about 550 m, except when structurally thickened where faults
culated from seismic well ties from the CR-12 well (Figure 3C). below and the “weak” clastic unit above. A second strong emerge from the underlying Cretaceous carbonate package
Our discussion will focus on seismic lines CCT-90c-14 and CAT- impedance contrast occurs at the base of the carbonate section (Figure 3).
85-1 (Figure 3A–C), which cross the crest of Rosario, where the and the top of the underlying Rio Negro clastic section. These
71
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-5: Rosario Field
Figure 3: 2-D time-migrated seismic lines over the Rosario structure (see Figure 4 for location). Seismic lines are about 1:1 in the vicinity of the Cretaceous section.
(A) uninterpreted line CCT-90c-14. Tie-line locations are labeled in gray. (B) interpreted line CCT-90c-14. Formation tops are labeled on the right; the approximate
middle-Miocene surface is dashed. RF = Rosario Fault.; REF = Rosario East Fault. (C) line CAT-85-1. (continued on the next page).
72
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-5: Rosario Field
Figure 3 (continued): (D) CAT-85-2. (E) CAT-85-3. (F) CAT-85-4. (G) CAT-85-5. The top of La Luna (blue) is mapped in Figure 4A. The top of Colon Shale (green) is mapped in Figure 4C. See
Figure 4 for location.
73
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-5: Rosario Field
Figure 4: (A) Top La Luna Formation sub-sea depth structure (blue reflector in Figure 3). Solid red lines represent the position of seismic lines published in this section of this volume. Other lines are published in Apotria and Wilkerson (2002). Dashed lines mark fold hinges for Rosario and
Rosario East. Contour depths range from -4925 m (blue) to -4025 m (red) with a contour interval of 50 m. (B) Top La Luna dip magnitude map with superposed structure contours. Dip is a maximum of 22° (red) and a minimum of 0° (blue). (C) Top Colon Shale sub-sea depth structure map (green
reflector in Figure 3). Dashed line represents a single fold axis for both Rosario and Rosario East. Contour interval is 50 m. (D) Top Colon Shale dip magnitude map with a maximum of 18° (red) and a minimum of 0° (blue) with superposed structure contours. (E) Sub-sea depth structure-contour
map of the Rosario Fault. Contour interval is 100 m. Red arrow indicates the assumed regional transport direction perpendicular to the Perija Mountain Front (Figure 1). Dashed lines represent boundaries between the ramp and the two flats. The flats die out to the south, with only a ramp near the
termination. The Rosario Fault also changes attitude toward the north, defining an oblique ramp. The oblique ramp is associated with fold closure to the north, but does not appear to directly influence the fold termination to the south.
The present-day geometry at the crest of the Rosario structure has the essential characteristics accommodated by folding. As shortening accrues, the ramp grows up and down section, eventu-
of a fault-bend fold (Figure 3A–C). However, the lateral variation in fold and fault geometry sug- ally linking with upper and lower stratigraphically-controlled flats. In the kinematic model that fol-
gests that a flat-ramp-flat is not present near the termination, and may have been absent during lows, we extend Eisenstadt and DePaor’s (1987) 2-D model to 3-D, and assert that spatial variation
the structure’s early development. Eisenstadt and DePaor (1987) proposed a 2-D model for fault in geometry is also a proxy for temporal variation.
growth in which a fault ramp initially nucleates in the “stiff” layer with associated tip strains
74
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-5: Rosario Field
Kinematic Model of the Rosario Structure
Figure 6: Model for the 3-D development of the Rosario structure. Each profile represents stages in both the temporal and spatial evolution of the
Figure 5: Outcrop analog from the La Luna quarry (see Figure 1 for location). The lower massive unit is the Maraca Member of the structure from (A) earliest/least displacement to (D) latest/most displacement. See explanation in text below.
Cogollo Group carbonates, which is overlain by the thin-bedded, La Luna Formation. The deformation style that occurs at outcrop scale
where the fault emerges from the Maraca is similar to that seen at seismic scale where faults emerge from the “stiff” carbonate section
into the “weak” Colon Shale (Figure 3). This style of deformation at the tip of an emerging thrust fault could account for some of the
apparent thickening in the Colon Shale seen on seismic sections near the ramp upper-flat transition.
Assuming that the spatial variation in the fault-fold geometry Stage 2 (middle-Miocene, Figure 6B). Shortening of the section ment places the hanging-wall ramp onto the upper flat, and the
also represents the temporal variation of the fold’s develop- initiates with small reverse offset near the top of the Cretaceous forelimb begins to steepen. This is supported by the decrease in
ment, we suggest the following kinematic model for the Rosario carbonates. Folding of the Colon Shale occurs with fault propa- forelimb dip toward the present-day termination (Figure 4B, D).
structure. Each interpreted fold growth stage is consistent with gation through the “stiff” carbonate interval. Sub-seismic scale
observed geometry from tip to crest. deformation of the Tertiary section is manifested by layer-par- Stage 4 (Figure 6D). As displacement accrues, the Rosario Fault
allel shortening. No evidence for a backlimb is observed. This continues to propagate downward and eventually connects to
Stage 1 (pre-middle-Miocene, Figure 6A). Cretaceous and line resembles Figure 3F and 3G observed near the present-day the basal flat within the Rio Negro or La Quinta Formations. This
younger strata are essentially undeformed. Regional uplift and southern termination. produces a discrete backlimb-lower flat transition that is
erosion occurred within the western Maracaibo Basin in the observed at the present-day fold crest (e.g., Figure 3A–D). When
Eocene, but no local fold developed at Rosario during this time. Stage 3 (Figure 6C). The fault ramp links with an upper detach- both upper and lower flats are operative, additional fault dis-
ment in the Colon Shale with potential structural thickening placement is accommodated by fault-bend folding.
near the upper flat (analogous to Figure 5). Increased displace-
75
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-5: Rosario Field
The 3-D interpretation of the Rosario structure highlights the importance of distinguishing fault-bend fold geometry
from fault-bend fold kinematics. At the crest, the Rosario structure exhibits characteristics of a fault-bend fold (e.g.,
a lower and upper detachment, intervening ramp, and a hanging-wall ramp on footwall flat geometry). However, the
diagnostic geometric elements of a single profile do not uniquely establish the kinematic development. The Suppe
(1983) fault-bend fold model assumes flexural slip as the deformation mechanism, and results in passive folding
above a pre-existing fault. The prescribed kinematic model results in fold geometry that is a function of the under-
lying fault geometry, and a forelimb dip that remains constant with slip. Given the assumptions (Suppe, 1983), one
can predict the orientation of one element (e.g., the ramp dip) given two other elements (e.g., forelimb dip and the
axial angles).
We measured the same geometric elements near the crest of the Rosario structure on seismic line CAT-85-1 (Figure
7) and compared them to theory (Suppe 1983). The forelimb dip (β) is 22°, consistent with the dip map on the top of
the La Luna (Figure 4B). The axial angle (γ) is more difficult to determine due to smooth, parallel folding, but our esti-
mate is 80°. Using these measurements, the Suppe (1983) model predicts a ramp step-up angle (θ) of 17°, which is
our observation on CAT-85-1, if backlimb dip is used as a proxy for the ramp dip. The natural example matches the
Suppe (1983) model prediction of the geometry of a single profile. However, our observations of the structure in 3-D
suggest the kinematics of the Rosario structure are different than in the Suppe (1983) model.
Our observations are consistent with the model in Figure 6, in which the Rosario structure evolved from a “fault-
propagation fold” into a “fault-bend fold” (geometric rather than kinematic description). We also note that the fore-
limb dip decreases along strike (Figure 4B), further supporting a hybridized model. Although the Rosario crest has
present-day geometry consistent with a simple fault-bend fold, the kinematics are more complicated than a single 2-
D profile would suggest. Preservation of growth strata, poorly defined in this study area, would be of further use to
constrain the kinematic development of the fold.
Conclusions
• The southern termination of the Rosario structure likely formed due to an along-strike decrease in displacement.
Key elements of the interpretation include: a) the fault geometry changes from flat-ramp-flat at the crest to a fault
ramp near the southern tip of the structure, b) forelimb dip decreases toward the southern termination, and c) the
backlimb is indistinct toward the southern termination.
• These observations suggest kinematics in which the structure initially developed as a simple fault ramp in the
“stiff” layer (fault-propagation fold stage) and later propagated to connect with upper and lower detachments
Figure 7: (A) Seismic line CAT-85-1 (Figure 3C) with the addition of interpreted dip domain (fault-bend fold stage). Our model is a 3-D extension of a 2-D model proposed by Eisenstadt and DePaor (1987) in
boundaries (red). (B) Angular measures of fold geometry where γ = axial angle, β = forelimb dip, which fault ramps nucleate in “stiff” units.
θ = ramp dip. The geometric elements of this single profile are consistent with the Suppe (1983)
fault-bend fold model. However, based on interpretation of the structure in 3-D, the inferred kine-
• Rosario provides a natural example of a structure where spatial differences may reflect temporal stages in the evo-
matic development is different. Instead, the structure develops from a fault-propagation fold (active lution of a fault-related fold. The model departs from previous models of rigid self-similarity and permits variations
fold above a buried fault tip) into a fault-bend fold (passive fold above an existing fault) as slip in fold style and deformation mechanisms influenced by mechanical stratigraphy.
increases (Figure 6).
Acknowledgments
Permission to reproduce the seismic data was provided by Elsevier Press and The Journal of Structural Geology. We
also thank ExxonMobil Exploration Company, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, and PDVSA (Venezuela) for
permission to publish.
76
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-6: Medina Anticline, Eastern Cordillera, Colombia
Mark G. Rowan, Rowan Consulting, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
Roberto Linares, Ecopetrol, Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo, Piedecuesta, Santander, Colombia
Figure 2: Uninterpreted 2-D time-migrated seismic profile across the Medina Anticline, the adjacent Rio Amarillo Syncline, and the frontal Aguaclara Fault (location shown on Figure 4). The fold
geometry, with symmetrical limbs, a horizontal crestal domain, and sharp hinges separating planar dip domains, suggests a fault-bend fold origin. Seismic data courtesy of Ecopetrol.
Figure 1: Map showing the location of the Medina anticline along the eastern border of
the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia, between the Quetame basement massif and the frontal
Aguaclara fault. Insert shows the location of the larger map in the northwestern corner of
South America.
77
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-6: Medina Anticline
Axial-trace maps display structure contours and
the plan-view traces of fold hinges (Wilkerson et
al., 1991; Shaw et al., 1994; Shaw and Suppe, 1994).
Models of fault-bend folds in which displacement
increases along strike produce a pattern of active
and inactive axial traces and a three-dimensional
geometry in which the crestal domain narrows
and then widens (Figure 3). Axial traces interpret-
ed on individual seismic profiles across the
Medina Anticline (Figure 4) were projected verti-
cally and connected to create the axial-trace map
for the fold (Figure 5). Although this map is broad-
ly similar to the model pattern (Figure 3), there
are also significant complications. Furthermore, it
is possible to generate comparable patterns by
varying parameters other than displacement
(Rowan and Linares, 2000). Thus, further analysis
is needed to identify active and inactive axial
traces, understand the critical variables, and com- Figure 3: Perspective view and axial-trace map of fault-bend fold in
plete the interpretation. which displacement increases along strike (after Shaw et al., 1994). Active
and inactive axial traces are green and red, respectively.
Figure 5: Time-structure map of the top of the Mirador Formation (contour interval is 400 msec; depth is relative
to arbitrary datum near surface). Contours are in black (tick marks point downdip), seismic lines are in grey, faults
are in red, wells are in orange, and erosional truncation is shown by the thick dashed line. The blue lines are the
axial traces at this structural level, and the arrows point in the dip direction. The Medina Anticline is bounded by
the broad Nazareth Syncline to the northwest and the tight Rio Amarillo Syncline to the southeast. The crestal
domain is most narrow at the fold culmination and plunges to the southwest and then south to where it intersects
the Aguaclara Fault where it curves west. Similarly, the backlimb curves and becomes less steep toward the
southwest and south.
Figure 4: Partial interpretation of the line shown in Figure 2. The red dashed line is the top of the upper Eocene Mirador sandstone (the main reservoir in the area),
which is constrained by nearby well control in both the hanging wall and footwall (see Figure 5). The steep grey lines are axial traces along the fold hinges separating
planar dip domains; the offset of axial traces in the Medina Anticline is caused by a minor detachment at the base of the Oligocene to lower Miocene Carbonera shales.
78
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-6: Medina Anticline
Fold-evolution matrices show the profile geometry of folds with two varying parameters and are
used to construct model axial-trace maps and corresponding perspective views (Rowan and
Linares, 2000). Figures 6, 7, and 8 show the fold-evolution matrix, axial-trace maps, and perspec-
tive views, respectively, for a model in which both displacement and ramp dip vary linearly.
Changes in ramp dip result in curved structure contours (Figures 7c, d and 8c, d) rather than the
straight contours produced by varying displacement (Figures 7a, b and 8a, b). However, this dif-
ference is distinctive only for the linear gradients used; for example, a nonlinear displacement gra-
dient would result in curved axial traces. A more reliable criterion for distinguishing between
changing displacement and changing ramp dip is limb dip. As the ramp dip decreases, both fore-
limb and backlimb dips decrease (Figures 7c, d and 8c, d). Thus, parallel structure contours
(Figures 7a, b and 8a, b) indicate only changing displacement, whereas divergent structure con-
tours (Figures 7c, d, e, f and 8c, d, e, f) show that the ramp dip is varying along strike.
Figure 7: Axial-trace maps of the six panel combinations indicated in Figure 6, in which displacement and/or ramp dip vary linearly along
strike. Black lines are structure contours, and dip symbols show the orientation of dip domains.
Figure 6: Fold evolution matrix for linear increase in displacement and linear decrease in ramp dip (28.5, 22.5, 16.5, and 10.5
degrees). (a) through (e) indicate six different combinations of four profile geometries used to construct the corresponding axial-
trace maps (Figure 7) and perspective views (Figure 8).
Figure 8: Perspective views corresponding to the axial-trace maps of Figure 7, in which displacement and/or ramp dip vary linearly along
strike.
79
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-6: Medina Anticline
The presence of the Rio Amarillo Syncline between the Medina Anticline and the immediate hang-
ing wall of the Aguaclara Fault suggests that there is a flat between the Medina ramp and the
Aguaclara ramp. Such a flat could change length along strike, so we illustrate a fold-evolution
matrix, axial-trace maps, and perspective views (Figures 9, 10, and 11, respectively) in which both
displacement and flat length vary linearly. The resulting axial-trace patterns and three-dimen-
sional geometries are complicated by the presence and interference of new axial surfaces (C, C,
D, D) associated with the syncline and frontal ramp. The effects are best seen in the third column
of Figure 9, where displacement increases over a flat of fixed length. B migrates toward the foot
of the upper ramp, intersecting with C to form D. When B reaches the upper ramp, it becomes
fixed and C now migrates up the ramp. In the meantime, B is also migrating forward; when it reach-
es the foot of the upper ramp, B and B are eliminated and replaced by a new set of A and A axial
traces associated with the frontal ramp. Farther up the ramp are C, D, and an offset B (e.g., top
of second column).
Figure 10: Axial-trace maps of the six panel combinations indicated in Figure 9, in which displacement and/or flat length vary linearly along
strike. Thin black lines are structure contours, thick black lines are faults, and dip symbols show the orientation of dip domains.
Figure 9: Fold evolution matrix for linear increase in displacement and linear increase in flat length. (a) through (e) indicate six
different combinations of four profile geometries used to construct the corresponding axial-trace maps (Figure 10) and perspec-
tive views (Figure 11). Red numbers (1–6) indicate geometries used to construct the model axial-trace map in Figure 12; 3 is
intermediate between the middle two profiles in the top row, and 4 is intermediate between the top two profiles in the second col-
umn.
Figure 11: Perspective views corresponding to the axial-trace maps of Figure 10, in which displacement and/or flat length vary linearly
along strike.
80
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-6: Medina Anticline Figure 12: (a) Synthetic axial-plane map constructed using geometries 1–6 in
Figure 9; and (b) corresponding interpretation of the Medina Anticline. In (a),
the six profile geometries from Figure 9 were spaced equally and rotated to
match the orientation and approximate the scale of the Medina Anticline. Thus,
from southwest to northeast: flat length first increases as displacement is held
constant (1–3), flat length then decreases as displacement increases (3, 4), flat
length again increases as displacement is held constant (4, 5), and then both flat
length and displacement increase (5, 6). The dashed line in (a) is the approxi-
mate location of the Aguaclara Fault, and the number 1 in (b) indicates the nar-
rowest point of the crestal domain where axial traces A and B switch between
active and inactive.
To model the Medina Anticline, selected profiles from Figure 9 are joined
in map view to create the synthetic axial-trace map in Figure 12a. This
model accurately depicts most of the features of the Medina Anticline,
so that axial traces can now be identified (Figure 12b). However, the
model has a narrow backlimb and horizontal crest to the southwest
(Figure 12a), whereas the observed geometry shows a widening back-
limb and dipping, curving crestal domain (Figure 12b). We infer that this
is caused by a southwestern decrease in ramp dip, as modeled in Figures
7c and 8c.
Figure 13: Finished interpretation of the line shown in Figure 2. The axial-trace analysis and comparison of the observed map to the model map (Figure 12) allows the axial traces
to be identified. The level of the flat is determined by the intersection of A and B where the crestal domain is narrowest (location 1 on Figure 12b) and then correlated along strike.
The length of the flat is determined by the intersection of active axial traces B and C at the top of the lower ramp and base of the upper ramp, respectively. Note that the length of the
hanging-wall flat (B-C) approximately balances that of the footwall flat (B-C).
81
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-6: Medina Anticline
The fault geometry constructed on each profile is shown in map view in
Figure 14. Also shown are deeper normal faults visible in the southwest;
their continuation to the northeast is not imaged but is likely, and we spec-
ulate that the Medina fault-bend fold formed where the Aguaclara Fault
ramped up over an underlying basement normal fault (Figure 15). Both the
thick-skinned uplift of the Quetame basement massif and the thin-skinned
development of the Medina Anticline are interpreted to have formed during
Tertiary inversion of a Jurassic rift basin (Figure 15) (Rowan and Linares,
2000; see also Cooper et al., 1995).
Figure 15: (a) Regional 1:1 cross section through the culmination of the Median Anticline showing its relationship to the inverted Quetame basement massif; and (b)
Schematic reconstruction (not to scale) showing the infilled rift geometry at the end of the Cretaceous. Aguaclara fault is shown as an out-of-the-syncline thrust, but it
could also be rooted in basement. Tan = prerift basement; blue = Jurassic synrift; green = Lower Cretaceous; orange = Upper Cretaceous; yellow = Tertiary/Quaternary.
Conclusions:
• The Medina Anticline is a fault-bend fold, probably formed as the Aguaclara Fault ramped up over a
basement normal fault during Tertiary inversion of a Jurassic rift basin.
Figure 14: Map of the fault geometry underlying the Medina Anticline as constructed using the axial-surface analy- • The three-dimensional geometry is controlled by: (1) An increase in displacement to the northeast;
sis. Most of the fault consists of a lower ramp, an intermediate flat that widens to the northeast, and an upper ramp. (2) An increase in flat length to the northeast; and (3) A decrease in ramp dip to the southwest.
To the southwest, the fault curves westward, forming an oblique ramp and thus a lower ramp angle. This is apparently • Axial-surface analysis is a useful tool for constraining subsurface geometry where axial traces are easily
in response to curving traces of deeper, rift-related normal faults that offset prerift basement (blue). Contour interval is
400 msec; depth is relative to an arbitrary datum near surface.
defined, but must be used in conjunction with other data/techniques to avoid model-driven interpreta-
tions.
82
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-7: Three-dimensional interpretation of the El Furrial Trend,
Eastern Venezuela Basin, Venezuela
Miguel Morales, PDVSA, EPM, Venezuela.
Enrique Hung, PDVSA, EPM, Venezuela.
Richard Bischke, Subsurface Consultants & Associates, LLC.,
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
El Furrial is the easternmost of three major structures (El Furrial, Carito, and Tejero, from east to west) that form the
North Monagas fields in the Serrania del Interior fold and thrust belt (Figure 1). The trend has 11 billion bbl of oil in
place and presently produces 400,000 bbl/day. The structures trend northeast-southwest across northeastern
Venezuela, and are offset in a dextral en echelon relationship to each other (Figure 3). These offsets are caused by
northwest trending lateral ramps in the underlying major thrust faults (Bischke et al., 1997). These structures are the
result of mid to late Miocene dextral transpressional displacements south of the El Pilar strike-slip fault (Figure 1).
In the northern part of the South American Plate, the transpressional displacements produced a series of north-
northwest-trending dextral tear faults and lateral ramps that turn to the east-northeast to become ramp and flat
thrust faults (Figure 2). Maps constructed of the fault surfaces indicate that many of the faults interconnect to form
a linked fault system (Boyer and Elliott, 1982). Figures 4 and 5 describe these general relationships. In Figure 4, the
Tejero ramp branches off the Urica Fault trend, and the offset Carito ramp creates another lateral ramp that trends
subparallel to the Urica Trend. In turn, the Carito ramp is offset from the Furrial ramp by another lateral ramp.
Figure 1: Simplified regional map showing the main structural elements of the Serrania del Interior fold and
thrust belt. See Figure 2 for a depth-corrected profile.
83
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-7: 3-D El Furrial Trend
The three ramp systems link to each other and to the Urica Fault trend along a lower fault flat (Figure 4).
Displacement of the hanging wall over the three ramps creates the three offset folds, which form the structural
traps for the fields. Based on interpretation of high quality 3-D seismic data (samples of which are shown on the
following pages), we interpret that these structures developed mainly as fault-bend folds (Suppe, 1983, 1985).
The El Furrial trend is overlain by the Pirital thrust, one of the largest faults in the regional system. The Pirital
thrust dips to the north over a horizontal distance of 20 km (Figure 6, sp 100 to 600 between 3 to 10 s). In the west,
the Pirital branches off the northwest-southeast trending Urica lateral ramp system, forming the western flank of
the Serrania del Interior fold and thrust belt (Figure 1) (Bischke et al., 1997). The Pirital fault overthrusts the
Oligocene Naricual reservoir unit, repeating about 500 m (16,000 ft) of the Cretaceous San Juan Formation (Figure
6). The main reservoir unit in the area is the Oligocene Naricual Formation, which contains fluvial deltaic to shal-
low marine sands (Prieto et al., 1990). The Naricual sands are approximately 500 m (1700 ft) thick (Figure 6), and
can contain 250 m (800 ft) of net pay. This northeastward prograding sequence of sands is contemporaneous with
Figure 3: Simplified depth map of the El Furrial trend showing offset fields. the trailing shelf margin of the South American Plate. Later overthrusting loaded and down warped the plate form-
ing a foredeep basin and most likely an outer rise, similar to the outer rise and gravity high observed seaward of
oceanic trenches (Watts and Talwani, 1974). Seaward of the trenches normal faults tend to occur on the
upwarped highs, which extend due to flexure. The Naricual Formation contains many normal faults that may have
originated in a similar fashion when the overthrust sheets of the Serrania del Interior advanced toward the south,
loading and flexing the South American Plate.
Figure 4: Block diagram illustrating a linked ramp-flat and lateral ramp system.
Figure 6: Regional cross section and stratigraphic column showing the main tectonostratigraphic elements from the Caribbean plate to the Orinoco tar belt (modified from
PDVSA Report).
Figure 5: Block diagram showing the hanging wall above the El Furrial, Carito, and Tejero ramps forming three
offset fault-bend folds.
84
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-7: 3-D El Furrial Trend
Seismic Overview
Here we present seismic profiles from a 3-D survey that
define the geometry of the El Furrial trend. The profiles are
migrated and displayed in time (Figures 7, 8) and depth
(Figures 9, 10). Figure 7 is an uninterpreted dip section (A)
that trends northwest-southeast across the structure. On dip
line A, near the trace of strike section B, there is a panel of
reflections that dips to the southeast (between 3 and 4.3 s)
that defines the forelimb of the El Furrial structure. This
south dipping panel overlies a prominent horizontal reflec-
tor at about 4.3 s. We interpret that this horizontal reflector
is a fault-plane reflection originating from the upper flat
(detachment) of a ramp-flat system. The fault is located at
the downward termination or discontinuities in the dip panel
(Dahlstrom, 1969; Tearpock and Bischke, 2002; see section
1A-2, this volume). The horizontal reflector can be followed
to the north where it joins a group of north-dipping reflec-
tions. We interpret these north-dipping reflections to repre-
sent the backlimb of a fold, which is thrust to the southeast
above the frontal ramp (Suppe, 1983, 1985). Figure 7: Section A — Seismic time profile images dip panels forming a south-verging anticlinal fault-bend fold. Intersection with section B is shown in black line.
Arrows highlight fault position.
Figure 8: Section B — Strike seismic profile in time showing dip panels formed above the main detachment surface.
85
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-7: 3-D El Furrial Trend
Structural Interpretation
In this section, we present interpreted depth profiles
(Figures 9 and 10). The high impedance package above 5 km
represents the Oligocene Naricual sands (orange horizon),
and the horizontal reflection just above 6 km is the upper
flat of the thrust fault. In section A (Figure 10), the fold con-
tains a flat crest separating a narrow, southeast-dipping
forelimb and a wide, northwest-dipping back limb. Based
on the fold and fault geometry, the structure appears to be
a fault-bend fold (Suppe, 1983, 1985; Novoa et al., section 2-
4, this volume).
Conclusions
• The super giant El Furrial trend is formed by three off-
set fault-bend folds.
• The folds are related to a linked dextral en echelon
ramp-flat and lateral ramp system.
• Shortening is estimated at 50%.
Figure 10: Area-balanced interpreted of dip line A.
86
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Deep-Water Niger Delta
Freddy Corredor, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
John Suppe, Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Location: Niger Delta, West Africa, Nigeria Using fold shapes, fault plane reflections, and patterns of growth planar backlimbs with increasingly shallower dips to growth stra-
Topics: Shear fault-bend folding, growth sedimentation sedimentation, we model a fault-related fold in the deep-water ta, suggesting a component of progressive limb rotation.
Niger Delta using shear fault-related folding theory. The Niger Forelimbs are short compared to backlimbs, but growth strata
Delta offers a unique opportunity to study fault-related folds, as show more consistent dips that suggests a component of folding
the structures are well imaged at deep levels in seismic reflection by kink-band migration. Combined mechanisms of kink-band
profiles and because they preserve growth strata that record fold migration and limb rotation are thus invoked to model the kine-
kinematics. Individual fault-related folds are characterized by long matics of this fault-realted fold.
Figure 1: Uninterpreted, migrated, and depth-converted 2-D seismic profile through a fault-related fold in the deep-water Niger Delta. We observed three basic structural patterns that are consistent with pure shear fault-bend folding kinematics: First, a long planar backlimb that dips less than the fault ramp
with increasing shallower dips of growth strata, second, a short forelimb compared to the backlimb, and third, a synclinal axial surface that does not bysect the syncline. Seismic data courtesy of MABON LTD.
87
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
The Niger Delta is situated in the Gulf of Guinea (Figure 2) on the mar-
gin of West Africa. Sourced by the Niger River, it is one of the largest
regressive deltas in the world with an area of roughly 300,000 km2, a
sediment volume of 500,000 km3, and a sediment thickness of more
than 10 km in the basin depocenter. The northern delta boundary is the
Benin flank, an east-trending hinge line south of the West Africa base-
ment massif. Cretaceous outcrops on the Abakaliki Fold Belt define the
northeastern delta boundary. The offshore boundary of the delta is
defined by the Cameroon volcanic line to the east, the border of the
Dahomey basin to the west, and the 4000 m bathymetric contour. From
the Eocene to the present, the delta has prograded southwestward into
the Gulf of Guinea. The Niger Delta basin consists of Cretaceous
through recent marine clastic strata that overlie oceanic and fragments
of continental crust. The compressional fault-related fold structures in
the deep-water Niger Delta are the product of contraction due to grav-
ity-driven extension on the shelf.
Figure 3: 2-D seismic section through the fault-related fold interpreted in this contribution showing some important characteristics including (1) sea floor reflection, (2)
top of oceanic crust reflector, and thrust fault plane seismic reflection indicated by red arrows. Notice how the backlimb dips much less than the fault ramp. See text for
detail of (3) and (4).
The stratigraphic sequences imaged in the seismic profile shown above (Figure 3) correspond to Tertiary deep-
marine and deltaic sediments. At the bottom of this sequence, the Akata Formation, which can be observed above
the Top of oceanic crust reflection (2), is up to 3000 m thick in this portion of the delta, and is composed of thick
deep marine shale sequences (potential source rocks), and may contain some interbedded turbidite sands (poten-
tial reservoirs in deep water environments). On seismic sections, the Akata Formation is generally devoid of inter-
nal reflections (3), and exhibits low P-wave velocities that produce a pull-down velocity effect in time sections, and
may indicate regional fluid overpressures. This Formation corresponds to the weak decollement layer that under-
goes an externally imposed shear deformation in this fault-related fold. We use shear fault-bend fold kinematics (sec-
tion 1B-4, this volume) to interpret this structure. Shear fault-bend folds are characterized by long planar backlimbs
that dip less, or much less than the fault ramp, as observed in Figure 3 (4), and shows increasingly shallower dips
to growth strata suggesting a component of folding by limb rotation. A fault plane reflection is clearly observed (red
arrows) that constrains the fault geometry and its planar nature. The fault ramp dips at an angle of 26°. The long pla-
nar backlimb dips at an angle of 7.5°, which is much less than the dip of the fault. Also notice that, unlike conven-
tional fault-bend folds, the length of the backlimb does not represent the amount of slip along the fault, and that is
represented by the distance between the green dots. This difference between the fault displacement and backlimb
length is due to the combined limb rotation and kink-band migration folding mechanisms that occur in shear fault-
bend folding kinematics. Two end-member interpretations are possible: Simple shear and pure shear fault-bend fold-
ing. We will discuss the main structural and stratigraphic features to distinguish between these two end members.
Figure 2: High-resolution shaded relief and seafloor bathymetry image of the Niger Delta showing the approxi-
mate location of the seismic line used in this study (1).
88
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
This fault-related fold can be modelled using the pure shear or simple shear fault-bend folding kinematics (section 1B-4,
this volume), (Figures 4 and 5). In simple shear fault-bend folding a weak decollement layer of finite thickness (The Akata
Formation) at the base of fault ramps undergoes an externally imposed bedding-parallel simple shear with no basal fault.
In pure shear fault-bend folding the deformation of a weak decollement layer of finite thickness is locally confined to the
rock volume in the inmediate vicinity of the fault ramp where stresses are high. The basal decollement layer slides above
a basal fault and shortens and thickens above the ramp with no externally applied bed parallel simple shear. The slip
along the basal detachment decreases to zero at the bottom of the fault ramp. The total slip, then, is accomodated by slip
along the fault ramp, and by thickening of the weak decollement layer. In simple shear fault-bend fold kinematics the syn-
clinal axial surface at the bottom of the fault ramp bysects the syncline, while in the pure shear fault-bend fold kinemat-
ics this synclinal axial surface is not the angle bisector of the syncline.
Figure 5: A) Pure shear fault-bend folding end member theory graph (section 1B-4, this volume)
Figure 4: Two kinematic models of simple and pure shear fault-bend folds constructed using the end member theory graphs of Figure 5. A) Simple kinematic model of a pure shear fault-bend fold showing the relationship between ramp dip, back dip, and dip of the syncline axial surface within the
showing downward propagation of shear with the resulting patterns of growth strata, where the slip rates along the fault ramp are equal to the rates of growth sedimentation. The distance between the weak decollement layer. The yellow square in the graph corresponds to the fault-related fold inter-
bottom of the growth axial surface and the synclinal axial surface at the top of the pre-growth sequence is equal to the maximun slip along the basal fault. B) Simple kinematic model of a simple shear preted in this contribution. B) Simple shear fault-bend folding end member theory graph (section
fault-bend fold with patterns of growth strata, where the slip rates along the fault ramp are equal to the rates of growth sedimentation. The final geometry of the fault-related fold is the same in both 1B-4, this volume). The yellow squares in the graphs correspond to the fault-related fold interpreted
models. Pure shear fault-bend folding kinematics require a shallower detachment level compared to the calculated detachment using simple shear fault-bend folding. using the backlimb and cut-off angles interpreted in this section (2-8).
89
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
Figure 6: Simple shear fault-bend fold interpretation of the migrated 2-D seismic profile in the deep-water Niger Delta. A shear profile is included that
Simple Shear Fault-bend Fold
shows the deformation of a line originally perpendicular to bedding before deformation. This profile shows how the shear decreases upwards. The shear is
concentrated between the bottom of the fault ramp and the yellow horizon. An overall simple shear (αe) of 40° is interpreted in the lower 1000 m that ter-
minates in the top of the kink-band (a-b), which agrees with the value predicted via theory from the back-limb dip (δb) of 7.5° for kink-band (a-b) and a
fault dip (θ) of 26°. A simple shear (αe) of 15° is interpreted in the next 500 m that terminates at the fault in kink-band b-c, which agrees well with a
shear predicted via theory from the back-limb dip (δb) of 6° for kink-band (b-c) and a fault dip (θ) of 26°. Notice that fault slip decreases from a maximum
at the top of the ramp to zero at the base of the ramp. Shallow growth strata over the backlimb suggests limb rotation. The synclinal axial surface in this
case was interpreted at the point of maximum curvature between the synclinal dip domains. It bisects the syncline across the weak decollement layer. A
lower detachment is interpreted at 6500 m depth where the synclinal axial surface intercepts the bottom of the fault ramp. Notice how the length of the
backlimb does not reflect the amount of slip along the fault as predicted by conventional fault-bend fold theory. The forelimb is interpreted using multi-
bend fault-bend folding theory. The growth strata onlap the forelimb according to the theory when the rate of growth sedimentation is lower than the rate
of structural growth. The gentle dips of the growth strata could be the result of differential compaction and drape.
90
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
Figure 7: Pure shear fault-bend fold interpretation of the migrated 2-D seismic profile in the deep-water Niger Delta. A shear profile is included that
Pure Shear Fault-bend Fold
shows the deformation of a line originally perpendicular to bedding before deformation. This profile also shows how the shear decreases upwards. The
shear is concentrated between the bottom of the fault ramp and the yellow and green horizons. An overall pure shear (αe) of 60° is observed in the lower
700 m that terminates in the top of the kink-band (a-b), which agrees well with the value predicted via theory from the back-limb dip (δb) of 7.5° for kink-
band (a-b) and a fault dip (θ) of 26°. An additional pure shear is observed in the next 500 m that terminates at the fault in kink-band (b-c), which produces
a back-limb dip (δb) of 6.0° for kink-band (b-c). Notice that fault slip goes to zero at the base of the ramp. A much higher detachment is interpreted in this
case at 5700 m depth where the synclinal axial surface also intercepts the bottom of the fault ramp. Notice how the length of the backlimb does not reflect
the amount of slip along the fault as predicted by conventional fault-bend fold theory, and requires less slip than the simple shear case. The synclinal axial
surface in this case was interpreted at the location of maximum change in dip domain. It does not bisect the syncline across the weak decollement layer.
The synclinal back angle (ψ) is 23.5°, which agrees well with the value predicted via theory for the observed back-limb dip and ramp angles, and the cal-
culated shear angle.
91
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-8: Shear fault-bend fold, Niger Delta
Figure 8: Close-up view of the forelimb. The forelimb is interpreted using multibend fault-bend folding theory. The growth strata onlap the fore- Figure 9: Close-up view of the syncline showing the interpreted picks of the synclinal axial surface across different stratigaphic levels (green
limb as predicted by the model when slip rates are greater than growth sedimentation rates. The gentle dips are probably produced by differential dots). The synclinal axial surface, in this interpretation, does not bisect the syncline. Thickening along the decollement layer (Akata Formation)
compaction and drape. can be observed above the fault ramp, on the left flank of the syncline. These two observations suggest a pure shear fault-bend fold.
Conclusions: to the thickening of the weak decollement layer across the rates of uplift along the fault ramp during initial stages of
axial surface. fold growth producing onlap over the forelimb, and are
• A pure shear fault-bend fold is described in the outer fold • The forelimb is interpreted using the multibend fault-bend increased later such that no bathymetric relief develops.
belt of the deep-water Niger Delta where the weak decolle- folding theory. • The main feature that allows differentiation between single
ment layer corresponds to the deep marine Tertiary Akata • The length of the backlimb does not reflect the amount of and pure shear fault-bend folds in seismic sections is the
Formation. slip along the fault ramp. synclinal axial surface. This axial surface is an angle bisec-
• The pure shear fault-bend fold described in this section (2- • The patterns of growth sedimentation suggest increasing tor in simple shear fault-bend folds, but not in pure shear
8) is characterized by a long planar backlimb with increas- limb rotation by progressive increase of shear along the fault-bend folds due to the thickening of the weak decolle-
ingly shallower dips to growth strata, a short forelimb com- backlimb. ment layer across the axial surface as illustrated in the
pared to the backlimb with onlapping growth strata, and a • Rates of syntectonic growth sedimentation are lower than structure interpreted in this section (2-8).
synclinal axial surface that does not bisect the syncline due
92
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-9: Basil anticline, Northern Apennines, Italy
Fabrizio Storti, Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre,” Roma, Italy
Stefano Tavani, Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre,” Roma, Italy
Saverio Merlini, ENI/Agip Division, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy
Alessandro Mosconi, ENI/Agip Division, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy
Francesco Salvini, Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Università degli Studi “Roma Tre,” Roma, Italy
Figure 2: Post-stack, time-migrated 3-D seismic reflection profile across the Basil anticline and the Apenninic foredeep. The presence
of gas is indicated by the pull-down effect in Pliocene sediments.
Figure 3: Interpretation of the seismic profile. Basic sedimentary and tectonic features are highlighted. The lateral transitions among middle Eocene-Miocene sediments are well imaged, as well as the
outstanding Pleistocene unconformity and the overlying progradational sedimentary structures.
The Basil anticline is located at the toe of the Apennines fold and thrust belt, in the northern Adriatic Sea (Figure 1). In the regional seismic line (Figures 2, 3) the pre-, syn-, and postorogenic sedi-
mentary architectures are well imaged, as well as two major thrust-related structures and their overlying growth section. An outstanding feature in the preorogenic succession is the transition from a
middle Eocene-Miocene carbonate platform (easternmost sector) to a basinal sequence, through a slope domain. An upper Messinian unconformity marks the onset of foreland flexure and the sedi-
mentation of Pliocene synorogenic deposits in the sinking foredeep. A Pleistocene unconformity marks the end of the major contractional event, followed by the progressive filling of the depocenter.
93
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-9: Basil anticline
The Basil anticline provides a spectacular example of a thrust-related anti-
cline. Almost the entire fold shape and its interactions with surface pro-
cesses (syntectonic sedimentation and erosion) are very well recorded.
Deformation terminated before the occurrence of any fault breakthrough
within forelimb and this prevented any distortion induced by further fore-
landward translation. Upper Pliocene strata thin onto the crest of the anti-
cline, suggesting that they are growth strata (e.g. Suppe et al., 1992).
Erosion of part of the crest and the forelimb indicates that the late Pliocene
evolution of the anticline progressed in subaerial conditions. The probable
presence of wedge geometries in the Pleistocene sediments may support a
late reactivation of the fault-fold pair. We interpret this anticline as a
growth fault-propagation fold (Figure 5). Details of the basic observations
discussed above are provided in Figure 6.
Basil anticline
Outward propagation of the sole thrust along the bottom of the synorogenic sediments.
Displacement on the upward migrating frontal ramp is accommodated by the develop-
ment of the Basil fault-propagation anticline. Folding occurs in a high sedimentation envi-
ronment and well developed growth wedges form on both limbs.
Flexural sinking of the foreland and deposition of synorogenic clastic sediments in a fore-
deep environment.
Preorogenic succession
Figure 5: Numerically modeled (HCA; Salvini et al., 2001) cartoon showing the reconstructed evolutionary steps
for this sector of the Apenninic foreland system and the interpretation of the Basil anticline as a growth fault-propa-
gation fold.
Conclusions:
• The Basil anticline is a notheast-verging fault propagation
fold developed at the tip of a thrust ramp that soles down
into the upper Messinian unconformity.
• Upper Pliocene and, possibly, lower Pleistocene strata are syntec-
tonic units folded during fault motion.
Figure 6: Interpreted seismic image of the Basil anticline showing basic features that have been used for the reconstruction of fold kinematics.
95
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-10: Salt weld detached fault-propagation folds
Frank Bilotti, Timothy Brickner, Thomas Elliott, Chip Morgan, Richard Redhead, Yusri,
Unocal, Sugar Land, Texas, U.S.A.
Location: Deepwater Espirito Santo Basin, Brazil Figure 2: Pre-stack time migrat-
ed seismic profile converted to
Topics: Fault-propagation folding, salt welds, detachments
depth. This line images two con-
tractional structures that detach
An early Tertiary, north-south–oriented compressional event in from the welded autochthonous
the Espirito Santo Basin formed a mixture of salt-weld detached salt level.
fault-propagation folds and compressed salt walls. The larger
structures preserve a combination of salt-deflation stratigraphic
geometry and contractional fold geometry.
96
Figure 1: Regional map of the Espirito Santo Basin.
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-10: Salt weld detached fault-propagation folds
forelimb inactive
axial surface
backlimb active
axial surface
a. Predicted forelimb
dip based on bisect-
ing axial surfaces
matches seismic tie,
probably a steep
fold limb.
b. Seismic tie is extended across structure c. FPF theory predicts a basal step-up angle
and bisecting axial surfaces projected down- φ = 15° for γ = 30°. Since θ2 = φ, backlimb dips
ward. There is no net structural relief across should be equal to the basal step-up angle. In This balanced section works well for the shallow geometry that we
the structure so we postulate a flat basal this section the backlimb dips at 17°. Using used to constrain the fault-propagation fold model; however, it does
detachment. these parameters we predict the location of not agree well with the bed dips in the deeper part of the structure. In
the fault. fact, the steeper bed dips at depth suggest that the model fault geom-
Figure 7. Interpretation of the structure using fault-propagation fold (FPF) theory. etry would actually cut down section with respect to the hanging-wall
rocks. This leads us to explore another interpretation of the structure.
98
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-10: Salt weld detached fault-propagation folds
Solution 2: Using deep fold geometry
We again utilize fault-propagation folding theory to provide balancing constraints for the poorly balanced model section
imaged core of this structure. In this case, however, we choose to respect the geometry of the
deeper fold. The deep fold limbs are steeper and have more inflections in dip, yielding a more com-
plex solution. Here we invoke a low-angle breakthrough of a FPF.
b. Using the
FPF fold
geometry we
can predict
the first-
order fault Conclusions:
geometry.
• After nearly complete deflation and welding, the autochthonous salt level still provides a
sub-horizontal detachment surface for thin-skinned contractional structures
• This structure fits the basic geometry and kinematics described by fault-propagation
folding theory.
Figure 9. Interpretation of the structure using fault-propagation fold theory and • Two models were tested; of these, a more complex model utilizing deep geometry as the
geometric constraints from the deeper part of the structure. primary constraints provides a better fit to the data.
99
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-11: Structural inversion along the Sakala Fault,
East Java Sea, Indonesia
Shankar Mitra, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A.
The Sakala structure (Figure 1) is a fault-related inversion structure in the East Java Sea (Figure 2), located in a back arc setting
behind the Java trench. Along this trench, the Australian plate is subducted under the Eurasian plate, along a north-dipping sub-
duction zone (Hamilton, 1979). Inversion structures in this area resulted from north-south extension in the Eocene and Oligocene,
followed by compression in the same general direction, in the early Miocene.
Figure 2: Generalized map of the East Java Sea, showing the location of the Sakala inversion structure, and a seismic reflection profile through the structure.
100
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-11: Sakala inversion structure
In order to interpret the detailed geometry and evolution of the between the Ngimbang and Prupuh Formations shows a signifi- closely resembles that formed by the compressive reactivation
structure, a pre-stack depth migrated section (Figure 3) was cant increase in thickness from the footwall to the uplifted hang- of an extensional fault-propagation fold with fault breakthrough.
used. The structure is interpreted as an inversion structure ing wall across the fault. The thickness also increases gradually The fold geometry was used to model the fault geometry, which
formed along the south-dipping Sakala fault. The interval away from the fault zone. The structural geometry of the units is poorly imaged on the seismic sections (Figure 4a).
101
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-11: Sakala inversion structure
Forward modeling and restoration was used to decipher the in pre-extensional units, modeled by a clay layer, above a base- tually results in a major fault breaking through the clay unit at a
detailed evolution of the structure (Mitra, 1993). An experimen- ment fault dipping 45° degrees. Extension initially results in the steeper angle than the basement fault. The fault-propagation or
tal clay model (Figure 5; Mitra, 1993; Mitra and Islam, 1994) formation of a broad fault-propagation fold (Figure 5a). The drape dip is preserved in the hanging wall, and is rotated as it
demonstrates the development of an extensional fault-propaga- deformation occurs by the sequential development of a large passes through the synclinal hinge (Figure 5b).
tion (drape) fold, and the drape dip resulting from break- number of small normal faults, which are progressively rotated
through of the fault. The experiment simulates the deformation to steeper dips with increasing extension. The extension even-
Top Ngimhang Formation In late Eocene and Oligocene time, extension resulted in the development of
a fault-propagation fold above a deep-seated planar fault dipping approxi-
mately 40° (Figure 6a and b). The fault propagated at a steeper angle (55°)
through the fold in the Ngimbang and older units and subsequently through
the synextensional Prupuh Formation. The propagation of the fault through
the extensional fault propagation fold resulted in a basinward drape dip A-B
(Figure 6b). This drape panel was rotated to a shallower dip (B-C) as it passed
through the synclinal hinge. Basinward of C, units show a small dip into the
Top Prupuh Formation fault. The synextensional growth units deposited in the hanging wall showed
a progressive increase in thickness into the basin through the three major dip
panels.
Conclusions:
• The Sakala structure in the East Java Sea is interpreted to be an inversion structure formed by Miocene compressive reactivation of an Eocene-Oligocene extensional structure.
• Extension along the Sakala fault resulted in an extensional fault-propagation (drape) fold with subsequent fault breakthrough, resulting in the preservation of a drape dip in the hanging wall.
• Compressive reactivation along the fault occurred by fault-bend folding, accompanied by fault-propagation folding at the leading edge of the structure.
102
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-12: Detachment fold, Niger Delta
Frank Bilotti, Texaco, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Ronald M. Cupich, Texaco, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
Roisin M. Lakings, Texaco, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
Figure 2: Migrated 2-D seismic profile through the detachment fold. We observe
two basic structural patterns in the seismic profile (top) that are consistent with
detachment folds (left): 1) symmetric, dipping fold limbs situated over flat reflectors
in the Akata Formation and basement; and 2) syntectonic growth strata with bed
dips that shallow upward toward the seafloor. These observations, and the lack of
an obvious thrust ramp beneath the fold, indicate that the structure is a detachment
fold formed primarily by limb rotation. The structure grew during the Pliocene and
Quaternary.
Figure 1: Bathymetry of the offshore Niger Delta showing the major structural belts and the loca-
tion of the study area. Modified from Connors et al. (1998).
103
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-12: Niger Delta detachment fold
We present a kinematic model (Figure 3) and interpreted seismic reflection
profile (Figure 4) across the detachment fold. The kinematics of fold growth
are recorded by the geometry of syntectonic strata. In Figure 3, we compare
the growth of a model detachment fold with a restoration of the seismic
interpretation using heterogeneous inclined-shear. The restoration demon-
strates that the structure grew primarily by limb-rotation, with a minor com-
ponent of limb widening between restoration steps B and C.
Figure 4: Interpreted seismic section and geologic cross-section through the detachment structure.
Conclusions:
Figure 3: Sequential model (0-3) of a detachment fold (left) with fixed limb widths that grows by limb rotation. The
• This structure is a detachment anticline that grew primarily by limb-rotation since the early Pliocene.
model is compared with a balanced restoration of the structure (right) derived using variable inclined-shear (Novoa et al.,
1999). • The basal detachment is located in the Akata Formation marine shales, which thickened in the core
of the fold during growth.
104
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-13: Mississippi Fan Fold Belt, Gulf of Mexico
Mark G. Rowan, Rowan Consulting, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
Frank J. Peel, BHP Billiton Petroleum, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
The Mississippi Fan fold belt is one of several deepwater contractional provinces that formed in response
to gravitational failure of the northern Gulf of Mexico passive margin (e.g., Diegel et al., 1995; Peel et al.,
1995; Rowan et al., 2004). It comprises salt-cored detachment folds and associated reverse faults that
developed principally during the late Miocene (e.g., Weimer and Buffler, 1992; Rowan, 1997). Although all
folds were originally thought to be cored by the autochthonous Louann salt, modern data show that the
frontal folds are detached above an Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous allochthonous nappe (Peel, 2001;
Rowan et al., 2001, 2004).
In this section (2-13), we examine the three-dimensional geometry of a composite frontal fold using a
series of 3-D time-migrated seismic profiles and structure maps. The profile geometry varies considerably
along strike from a relatively simple, symmetric, unfaulted detachment fold (Figures 2, 3) to an asym-
metric, faulted fold that is vergent either basinward (Figures 4, 6) or landward (Figure 5). Also, an earlier
(Mesozoic) deformation phase complicates the deep geometry. Thus, no simple 2-D or 3-D structural
model adequately explains the relationship between the fold and associated faults, and geometric and/or
quantitative models are of minimal use in aiding seismic interpretation in this case.
105
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-13: Mississippi Fan fold belt
Figure 3: Uninterpreted and interpreted views of Profile B showing a rounded detachment fold with a very slight Figure 4: Uninterpreted and interpreted views of Profile C showing an asymmetric detachment fold with a long, planar backlimb and a steep forelimb cut by a basinward-
asymmetry and a minor, high-angle reverse fault on the forelimb. Again, note the differences in growth strata between vergent, high-angle reverse fault zone. The early deformation stage is clearly shown by the structural thinning and thickening (4) between the top salt (blue) and the top
the two limbs. Horizons as in Figure 2; location shown on Figures 7 and 10. 3-D data courtesy of WesternGeco. Oligocene (red). Horizons as in Figure 2 (dashed where approximate, dotted where uncertain); location shown on Figures 7 and 10. 3-D data courtesy of WesternGeco.
106
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-13: Mississippi Fan fold belt
Figure 5: Uninterpreted and interpreted views of Profile D showing a broadly symmetric fold with a larger reverse fault on the basin- Figure 6: Uninterpreted and interpreted views of Profile E showing an asymmetric fold with a long, gentle backlimb and a steeper, faulted fore-
ward limb but a deep-level crest on the landward side. Again, note the differences in growth strata between the two limbs. Horizons as limb. Again, note the differences in growth strata between the two limbs and the early deformation visible at depth on the backlimb. Horizons as
in Figure 2 (dashed where approximate, dotted where uncertain); location shown on Figures 7 and 10. 3-D data courtesy of in Figure 2 (dashed where approximate, dotted where uncertain); location shown on Figures 7 and 10. 3-D data courtesy of WesternGeco. The
WesternGeco. well was dry.
107
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-13: Mississippi Fan fold belt
The three-dimensional geometry of this salt-cored fold is complex, consisting of three en-echelon segments (I, II, and
III) and a smaller segment (IV), with individual culminations separated by saddles (Figure 7). Thus, any given profile
through the fold is likely to display significantly different geometries (Figures 2-6). Furthermore, the relationship
between the fold and its associated faults is highly variable: Segments I and II each have a frontal reverse fault (linked
at prominent cusp), segment IV has a small landward-vergent fault, and segment III is unfaulted (Figures 7 and 8).
Initial growth strata are thinned and rotated on both limbs (3 on Figure 2), consistent with detachment folding with
progressive limb rotation (e.g., Hardy and Poblet, 1994). However, shallow growth geometries (backlimb truncation
at 1 and forelimb onlap at 2 in Figure 2) are similar to those modeled for fault-bend folds with synkinematic erosion
(Figure 9) (Suppe et al., 1992; Hardy and Poblet, 1995). Although the detachment (base of salt nappe) does indeed
ramp up, the studied fold is a detachment fold with no higher-level flat or wedge thrust. Thus, a growth pattern of
backlimb truncation and forelimb onlap does not necessarily define a fault-bend fold. In this case, it was generated
by a salt-cored detachment fold in which the forelimb locked up as the backlimb continued to rotate.
Figure 8: Variation of shortening along the strike of the fold, divided into faulting and folding
components. A through E are the five profiles illustrated in Figures 2 through 6, respectively.
Modified from an earlier interpretation (Rowan, 1997), with shortening values determined from
line-length restoration of fourteen equally spaced profiles. There is no direct correlation between
fault and fold geometries because faults are secondary structures that may or may not develop
and modify preexisting detachment folds.
Figure 9: Modeled fault-bend fold with synkinematic erosion and sedimentation (modified
from Hardy and Poblet, 1995). The red horizon is a time-transgressive growth unconformity
(analogous to the yellow horizon in Figures 2-6), with time-equivalent strata truncated on the
backlimb (1) and onlapping the forelimb (2). The resulting growth geometry is very similar to
that observed in salt-cored detachment folds of the Mississippi Fan fold belt, which do not con-
tain an upper detachment and a connecting ramp (compare this figure with Figure 2b). Thus,
backlimb truncation and forelimb onlap do not uniquely define a fault-bend fold, but simply
Figure 7: Time-structure contour map of the studied fold (segments I, II, III, and IV) and more landward structures. Yellows and reds are highs, blues and purples are lows; thin show that the two limbs behaved differently.
black lines are reverse faults and black blobs are salt diapirs. The three-dimensional geometry is very complex: individual fold segments may have different orientations, plunge
angles, fold-fault relationships, and diapiric influence. Grey lines show seismic profiles of Figures 2-6.
108
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-13: Mississippi Fan fold belt
Another complicating factor is an earlier stage of deformation. Thickness variations in the section
between the top salt and the top Oligocene (e.g., 4 in Figure 4) reflect a dominantly Cretaceous tec-
tonic event. An isochron map of an interval immediately above salt shows a complex pattern of paleo-
highs and paleo-lows (Figure 10). A related feature is that the suprasalt Cretaceous and Paleogene sec-
tion is generally thinner than in the area basinward of salt (e.g., between the purple and red horizons
in Figure 2) because of distal salt inflation during the early history of the margin (Hall, 2000).
The variable profile geometry of this fold is thus partly due to the multi-phase deformation history
illustrated in Figure 11. Deformation began almost immediately after salt deposition due to differential
thermal subsidence and the consequent basinward tilt. This resulted in a combination of distal infla-
tion, nappe extrusion, and folding beneath a thin overburden. The complex geometry of these struc-
tures (Figure 10) is interpreted as an interference pattern during convergent gliding off both the
Florida and Louisiana margins. The early structures then served as buckling instabilities for the later
(Neogene) deformation, but only some were reactivated because of the thicker overburden, and thus
longer wavelength, of the detachment folding.
Figure 11: Schematic evolution based on quantitative restorations and regional considerations (modified from Rowan et al., 2000):
(a) Upper Jurassic salt deposition; (b) gravity gliding caused by Cretaceous thermal subsidence and basinward tilting results in distal
inflation, nappe extrusion, and small-wavelength folds; (c) relative quiescence during the Paleogene as thermal subsidence and tilting
wane; (d) gravity spreading of the Neogene progradational margin, resulting in larger-wavelength folding; and (e) cessation of defor-
mation as the Pleistocene deepwater Mississippi fan is deposited. Sections are not drawn to scale, and the effects of salt withdrawal
and diapirism are not shown.
Conclusions:
• Salt-cored detachment folds in the Mississippi Fan fold belt have complex three-
dimensional geometries with significant variations along strike caused by variable
fold-fault relationships and the effects of an earlier deformation phase.
• Patterns of growth strata are ambiguous and cannot always be used to determine the
fold style and nature of underlying faults.
Figure 10: Isochron map of an interval immediately above salt showing the geometry of the early (dominantly Cretaceous) deformation. Thins correspond- • In the case of salt-detached fold belts on passive margins, therefore, applying simple
ing to paleo-highs are in yellow and red; thicks corresponding to paleo-lows are in blue and purple. The complex pattern influenced the development of the geometric and quantitative models to shallow horizons in order to constrain the
later (Miocene) structures, shown by the black lines with arrows, resulting in the larger wavelength, variable fold geometries observed today. deeper interpretation is often inappropriate.
109
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-14: Yakeng detachment fold, South Tianshan, China
Aurélia Hubert-Ferrari, Institut de Géologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
John Suppe, Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Xin Wang, Department of Geosciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Chengzao Jia, PetroChina, Beijing, China
Figure 2b: Interpreted seismic (horizontal scale equals vertical scale, including topography) showing the 27 horizons used in analysis of Yakeng. Two major detach-
ments bound the thickening yellow and orange interval.
110
Figure 1: Yakeng fold at the front of the southern Tianshan. (Landsat TM) Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-14: Surface expression of fold growth and sediment trapping
Geomorphic expression: The morphology of the 50–150-m-high
topographic anticline illuminates the most recent increment of fold
growth and sedimentation. It is a deformed and incised alluvial sur-
face for which prior through-going drainage systems are still visible
(Figures 3 and 4), showing that deposition previously exceeded Figure 5: Low
uplift, similar to the present situation at Kuche where Yakeng is rounded morphology
of the Yakeng
largely buried (Figure 1). Limb dips (3–4°) in the valley east of the anticline.
seismic line (Figures 1, 2b) are a significant fraction of the seismic
dips (4–6°), indicating the extreme youth of Yakeng anticline.
111
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-14: Seismic characteristics and folding mechanism
Initial assessment: Yakeng anticline dies out downward (Figure
7), suggesting it is a classic detachment fold that can be analyzed
quantitatively for shortening and timing (Figure 8). However
Yakeng is too complex because of regional variation in strati-
graphic thickness below horizon 15 (Figure 9) and interference
with Yanan anticline (Figure 7). This forces us to move our analy-
sis of Yakeng from the depth domain to the thickness domain
(Figures 10–14).
Figure 8: Classical detachment folds are characterized by a linear upward increase of area of struc-
tural relief A = hs within pregrowth strata (Epard and Groshong, 1993). By measuring the area of
structural relief of many horizons the magnitude — and the timing — of shortening can be deter-
mined s = A/h. Shortening can also be determined for each layer from bed-length measurements
s = δL = L2 – L2, but only if bed length is conserved. Yakeng anticline is significantly more complex
than this model.
Figure 9: Measurement of area of structural relief (A11) following the model of Figure 8 is ambigu-
ous since the undeformed regional gradient (4) is hard to determine because the basement is folded
Figure 7: Yakeng anticline dies out downward in height and width, indicating a basal detachment (1, horizon 4), which extends to the north under Quilitak anticline. and thickness varies regionally. Therefore we move our analysis to the thickness domain (Figures
Yanan anticline is a basement-involved inversion structure that is young, as shown by changes in structural relief on its south flank (2). Yanan interferes with Yakeng anti- 10–14).
cline (3), making analysis of Yakeng more challenging.
112
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-14: Analysis of Yakeng in the thickness domain
By flattening the structure to appropriate horizons we can view the structure in the
thickness domain and more easily determine the regional stratigraphic gradients
(Figures 10–12), which are needed to measure areas of structural relief (Figures 10,
12). The analysis shows us that interval 4-15 has undergone significant shortening
(1200 m) and interval 4-5 has undergone additional diapiric flow (0.8 km2). The over-
lying strata (15-27) show modest thinning over Yakeng and nearly constant thick-
ness relief, which can be modeled as the beginning of growth. Strata above horizon
27 are more strongly thinned, showing a recent acceleration of growth of Yakeng,
preceeding its emergence as a topographic feature.
Figure 12: Yakeng anticline flattened to horizon 4 (h=v). The analysis given below shows that horizons 5–14 have undergone 1200 m of shortening and thickening
above an evaporitic detachment. There is and additional 0.8 km 2 of diapirism in the basal layer (4-5). Horizons 15–27 show a nearly linear upward dearease in shorten-
ing. After horizon 27 time shortening and uplift has accelerated leading to topographic emergence.
Introduction
C.W. Tomlinson (“Odd Geologic Structures of Southern
Oklahoma,” 1952) observed that late Paleozoic “Structures of
types somewhat unusual for the Mid-Continent region occur in the
Ardmore district of Oklahoma.” Despite structural peculiarity,
application of fault-related fold theory to a modern 2-D seismic
profile can explain the geometry of Fox-Graham Field (Figure 2),
one of Tomlinson’s “odd structures.” This section (2-15) illus-
trates 1) application of fault-bend fold theory to produce a model
of fault shape and footwall structure, 2) how concepts of struc-
tural wedging and fault propagation folding combine to produce a
model explaining the geometry and kinematics of the “rabbit-ear”
fold (Figure 2) and, 3) how these models are synthesized to pro-
duce a retrodeformable, kinematically-viable, forward model that
evolves to approximate the present geometry of the structure.
approximate 2-D
seismic line location
Figure 2: Uninterpreted, depth-converted 2-D seismic profile across Fox-Graham Field and the Harrisburg Trough. Besides the well-imaged fold that dominates the profile, of particular
importance in constraining a fault-related fold interpretation are the geometry of the pre-Pennsylvanian unconformity (1), recognition of fault plane reflections (2) and, recognition of footwall
structure (3). Tomlinson (1952) described the rabbit-ear fold along trend of the one imaged here. No vertical exaggeration.
114
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-15: Odd structures
Fault-Bend Fold Analysis: The true utility of fault-bend fold theory (Suppe,
1983), is its capability to provide a complete fault/fold solution using limit-
ed data. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate data constraints and fault-bend fold solu-
tion for the large fold. The solution (Figure 4) is a multiple bend fault-bend
fold. By itself, the solution is largely geometric with few explicit kinematic
implications. Incorporating other observations into the interpretation
makes it more robust. Recognizing the unconformity as an originally hori-
zontal isochron, for instance, constrains possible kinematic solutions by
defining the timing and location of folding. As an example, the small fore-
limb (+I in Figure 3) is not folded sympathetically with the unconformity,
and is therefore interpreted as an older structure, as opposed to a limb
formed by slip through Bend 3 (Figure 4).
Figure 3: Subdivision of the fold into dip domains (regions of equal dip, as in Suppe, 1983) in preparation for fault-bend fold analysis . Dips and the fault-plane
segment are regarded as “hard” constraints for the purposes of interpretation. Question marks denote uncertainty in the downward continuation of the fault plane
and fold axial surfaces (dashed black lines).
115
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-15: Odd structures imbricate
“shoulder”
Figure 5b: Model restored by removing fault slip does not restore the unconformity to hori-
zontal above the red panel. A footwall fold of some kind (indicated by the question mark)
must exist below the red panel to account for the discrepancy. The width of kink band A-A
represents the total slip of the hanging wall before the unconformity was formed. B-B, which
locally refolds A-A, represents slip on an unspecified footwall fault after the time the uncon-
formity formed.
116
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-15: Odd structures
“Rabbit-Ear Fold:” An “ odd” type of structure described by Forward Kinematic Model: Figure 10a through 10i shows stages in a balanced, kinematic forward model. Figure 10j shows that
Tomlinson (1952) is the rabbit-ears anticlinoria. Figure 8 com- the model result is a good fit with the seismic data giving validity to the solution. It must be noted that the solution is not
pares Tomlinson’s rabbit-ear fold with one imaged on the seis- unique, especially for the footwall structure, but is kinematically viable and therefore more robust than a balanced cross sec-
mic profile a few miles away. Figure 9 shows a generalized tion. Models like this are useful for considering any time-space dependent features in the petroleum system such as fracture
model of how this type of rabbit-ear fold could form as a type distribution and intensity, migration pathways and traps, and source-rock/reservoir juxtaposition during generation.
of structural wedge.
10a 10b
8a
8b
117
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-15: Odd structures
10e 10f 10f
Figure 10e: Initial wedge block fails and second wedge block (1) is emplaced Figure 10f: Renewed slip on deep (Arbuckle?) thrust widens initial kink Figure 10g: Renewed slip fault (1) produces hanging wall folding at fault bends
producing kink band (2) and slight bend in fault (3). band (1) by an amount (2) folding the entire section. (2)–(5). Rabbit-ear fold (6) begins to form above fault tip (7).
10j
10h 10i
Figure 10h: Continued slip on fault (1) amplifies growth of rabbit-ear fold. Figure 10i: Final increment of slip on fault (1) results in present struc-
tural geometry.
Figure 10j: Final stage of kinematic forward model from Figure 10i, enlarged and superimposed
on seismic profile. Note in particular the good fit between the model and the unconformity (1),
“shoulder” (2), rabbit-ear fold (3), and footwall reflections (4).
118
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-15: Odd structures
Timing of
structural
events
Table 1: Timing of structural events interpreted in kinematic model and on 2-D seismic profile. Letters correspond
to labels in Figure 11. Orogenies are adapted from Lang (1957) and Tomlinson and McBee (1959), based mainly on
the presence of conglomerates in the stratigraphic section. Events A-G support punctuated orogenesis, whereas H
demonstrates continuous deformation. The discrepancy in the thickness of Mississippian strata in well 3 vs. well 4
indicates that uplift related to slip on fault D probably began prior to deposition of basal Atoka, as opposed to after
as illustrated in the kinematic model. Observation of growth folding (as in Suppe et al., 1992) constrain displace-
ments in the kinematic model to show that the “shoulder” and rabbit-ear folds (Figure 11) formed coevally with G.
Both of these folds trap and produce significant quantities of oil, demonstrating that migration occurred after the
Pennsylvanian.
Conclusions:
This case study synthesizes basic observations from seismic and well data
(Figure 2), fault-bend fold analysis (Figures 3 and 4), kinematic constraints
on models of footwall deformation (Figures 5–7), principles of rabbit-ear
folding (Figures 8 and 9), and a fully-retrodeformable kinematic model
(Figure 10) to reasonably match the shape and explain the origin and tim-
ing of structures observed on a seismic profile (Figure 11, Table 1). It is
demonstrated that application of fault-related fold theory can even yield
tractable geometric and kinematic solutions for odd structures, like those
found in southern Oklahoma.
Acknowledgements:
The author thanks Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. (in particular
Frank Gaines) for providing the 2-D seismic line used in this study. Much of Figure 11: Cross-section interpretation of the seismic profile from Figure 2, incorporating the final stage of the kinematic model from Figure 10i (boundary shown in
this study was completed as part of the author’s Ph.D. thesis research at gray) plus additional well control (2, 3, and 4). Stratigraphy in the kinematic model is modified to better fit well control. Refer to Table 1 for labels A–H.
Princeton University, special thanks to advisor John Suppe and colleagues
John Shaw, Frank Bilotti, and Chris Connors. This section (2-15) benefitted
from thorough and thoughtful reviews by Stephen Hook and Peter Brennan.
119
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-16: Fault-bend folds in the southern Caribbean Ranges,
San Carlos, Venezuela
P. E. Kraemer, Pecom Energia, S.A., Neuquen, Argentina
J. Silvestro, Pecom Energia, S.A., Neuquen, Argentina
The San Carlos fold belt is located at the southern tip of the alloc-
thonous thrust front of the Caribbean Ranges, Venezuela (Figure 1). The
seismic example (Figure 2) shows a buried fold and thrust belt overly-
ing a normal faulted authoctonous platform. The main structures are
three folds (α, β, γ) with typical kink geometries (Suppe, 1983) overlain
by a Quaternary unconformity (U). The anticlines β and γ are linked to
a common decollement folded by the δ anticline and deep kink panels
probably related to footwall shale flow. The shortening on the main
thrust ramp is transferred to a structural wedge duplex at the front of
the fold belt (d). The γ anticline is interpreted as a multi-bend-fault-bend
fold (Medwedeff and Suppe, 1997) with two foot-wall (FWR1-2) and
hanging-wall (HWR1-2) ramps. The β anticline is a folded single ramp
fault-bend fold. The syncline (α) is interpreted as an early thrust sheet,
folded by a late thrust sheet (ε).
Figure 2: Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic section. Numbers 1, 2, and 3 indicate the suggested sequence of deformation of thrust sheets. Horizontal scale equals
Figure 1: Location map a) Geologic map of the Southern Caribbean thrust front, Venezuela. b)
vertical scale. Section trace shown in Figure 1. Time migrated seismic section displayed in depth.
Main structural features at the base of Quaternary unconformity.
120
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-16: Structural restoration
To test the validity of our structural interpretation and document the
sequence of thrusting, we present a four-stage area balanced restoration of
section A-A. The sequence of deformation is summarized as:
Stage 1: Footwall shale flow was active in the early stages of emplace-
ment of thrust sheet α until the late emplacement of thrust
sheet ε.
Conclusions:
• The seismic example shows typical kink-fold geometry.
• Folds are interpreted as single- and multi-bend fault-bend folds.
• Based on geometric constraints, the sequence of deformation is interpreted as shallow foreland propagat-
ing thrust sheets (α, β, γ) that are refolded by late deeper hinterland anticlines (ε, δ).
Figure 3: Sequential restoration showing the proposed sequence of deformation. Active faults are indicated Acknowledgements:
by solid red lines. Red dashed lines show fault trajectory prior to displacement.
The authors would like to thank Pecom Energia S.A. for the authorization to publish this section (2-16).
121
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-17: Quirk Creek anticline, Alberta, Canada
Steven Lingrey, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
The Foothills of the Canadian Rocky Mountains have provided many examples
of fold and thrust fault structural features considered to be characteristic of
the detached contraction of sedimentary layering (Bally et al., 1966;
Dahlstrom, 1970; Price, 1981; Boyer and Elliot, 1982). Surface exposures are
augmented by extensive seismic reflection profiling and by oil and gas drilling.
Fault-related fold mechanisms (Suppe, 1983; Jamison, 1987; Suppe and
Medwedeff, 1990) offer a means of more systematic analysis and prediction of
subsurface geometry within the context of seismic and well control. The
southern Alberta Foothills are particularly well suited for this type of analysis
because: 1) the area yields very good land seismic data, 2) well control is
abundant (mature gas field drilling province), 3) well-documented and uncom-
plicated pre-tectonic stratigraphic geometry (Cordilleran miogeoclinal plat-
form strata situated east of the hingeline), and 4) an empirically constrained Figure 2: Detail view of time-migrated seismic image of hanging-wall ramp (cutoff) showing bedding reflection terminations against fault reflection. Lower
system of bedding detachment horizons. In seismic data acquired over the Paleozoic terminations are clear between A-A and A-A; Upper Paleozoic terminations between B-B are off the end of the seismic line, but are visible in
northern Quirk Creek area (10 km south of Moose Mountain culmination; adjacent seismic data. The geometry of fold axes can be inferred in a fault-bend fold sense.
Figure 1) a clear example of a hanging-wall ramp (cutoff) is expressed by its
time-migrated reflection image (Figures 2, 3). The full uninterpreted seismic
line is displayed in Figure 4; its interpretation is displayed in Figure 5.
Figure 3: Fault-bend fold structural interpretation of detailed seismic image. Thrust fault trajectory is shown by dashed red line and its dotted projection off
the end of the seismic data. Fold axes are shown by dashed green lines; long dashes relate to changes between hanging-wall flats and ramps, short dashes
relate to secondary bends in the fault trajectory. Blue lines with arrowheads mark bedding orientations with cut-offs against the fault, blue lines with dashed
Figure 1: Location map for the seismic line showing position in inner Foothills
ends mark bedding roughly parallel to the fault. The isochrons between reflections mark an increase towards the anticlinal crest interpreted to be caused by
between Moose Mountain culmination and Quirk Creek gas field. Paleozoic out-
subseismic small thrust faults.
crop is shaded blue.
122
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-17: Quirk Creek
Figure 4: Post-stack time-migrated 2-D seismic reflection profile across the northern Quirk Creek area. Display is scaled to be 1:1 at an average interval velocity of 4000 m/s. Three wells indicate key stratigraphic tops and positions of fault repetitions. Three
stratigraphically calibrated zones of distinctive reflections guide interpretation away from the well control (yellow boxes): 1) a very high-amplitude continuous reflection event (doublet) characterizes the Jurassic-Lowermost Cretaceous Fernie-Kootenay zone imme-
diately overlying the Lower Carboniferous (Mississippian) Rundle Group, 2) a high-amplitude sporadically continuous reflection commonly occurs just above the top of the Devonian Palliser Formation, and 3) a system of higher amplitude reflections, three to four
cycles long, indicates the Cambrian strata.
123
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-17: Quirk Creek
Figure 5: Post-stack time-migrated 2-D seismic reflection profile across the northern Quirk Creek area showing structural interpretation. Blue line marks top of the Rundle Group; dark blue line marks top of the Palliser Formation; pink line marks middle Devonian
marker near the top of the Cambrian. Lines are dashed where seismic reflection imaging becomes uncertain. Thrust fault trajectories are marked by heavy, dark red lines. Bedding and faults allow subdivision of the Paleozoic into three layers: 1) Lower
Carboniferous (shaded blue), 2) Devonian (shaded dark blue, and 3) Cambrian (shaded pink). A semi-continuous set of high-amplitude reflections interpreted to be the base of the Cambrian reflection set below the basal decollement are shaded light orange. The
heavy, dashed orange line is the projected regional position for the base of the Cambrian assuming a flat, gentle (2–3 degrees) surface. The discrepancy between the two orange lines indicates a velocity anomaly that can be correlated to the number (net thickness)
of repetitions of Paleozoic carbonates. Beneath the exploration well 2-23-21-6W5, the velocity “pull-up” effect reaches 600 m/s.
124
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-17: Quirk Creek
To a first approximation, the Fernie-Kootenay reflection event
separates the Mesozoic rocks above, which show interval veloc-
ities of 4000 m/s, from the Paleozoic rocks below, which show
interval velocities of 6000 m/s. Imbrication of fast rocks above
Paleozoic detachment horizons deflects (pulls up) the unfaulted
sub-basal decollement reflection (lowest parts of the Cambrian
reflections). The magnitude of pull-up can be matched to the
excess thickness of Paleozoic imbricates contained in the overall
structure. The profile expression of the anticline conforms to Figure 6: Depth-converted profile of time-migrated seismic image. Time image velocity distortions due to lateral increase in fast Paleozoic rocks relative to slow Mesozoic rocks
fault-bend fold theory in that its western limb dip is caused by are removed. Basal fault trajectory consistently overlies Fernie-Kootenay strata and therefore is a footwall flat; the step in the central part of the fault is a bend caused by footwall
footwall ramps and its eastern limb dips are caused by hanging- deformation (northern plunge end of Quirk Creek gas trap). A-A and A-A mark position of lower hanging-wall ramp and B-B marks position of upper hanging-wall ramp.
wall ramps. Deeper elements show duplex-style deformation that
slightly modifies the overlying hanging-wall ramp. Conversion of
the time image to depth allows the degree of conformance to
ideal fault bend fold theory to be measured (Figure 6). The hang-
ing-wall ramp steps up from a lower detachment in the Cambrian
to an upper detachment in the Fernie-Kootenay. The upper
detachment begins just past the eastern end of this seismic line;
its position in the hanging-wall can be traced on other seismic
lines to the east where it is observed to place the Jurassic-
Cretaceous Fernie-Kootenay strata atop middle and Upper
Cretaceous strata. As the hanging-wall ramp crosses the
Paleozoic strata, it flattens briefly at an intermediate detachment
horizon located at the base of the Lower Carboniferous layer
(Banff detachment). Displacement is larger than the horizontal
extent of the hanging-wall ramp (> 5 km) so that the cutoffs fully
overlie the upper detachment. The corresponding footwall ramp
must exist west of the seismic data. Figure 7 shows a restoration
of the depth profile and an idealized geometric model using
Suppe’s (1983) mathematical constraints of fault-bend folding.
Conclusions:
• Fault-bend fold theory makes a good match with the Quirk
Creek anticline observed in seismic data.
• Westerly dips arise from thrust sheet strata overlying foot-
wall ramps (cutoffs).
• Easterly dips arise from rotation of the leading-edge cutoffs
(hanging-wall ramp) onto an upper detachment.
• Footwall duplexing complicates, but does not obscure the
fault-bend fold. Figure 7: Restoration and geometric modeling of fault-bend fold geometry. Top section (A) is a restoration of the depth profile using a flexural-slip mechanism. Restoration recovers the
primary flat-ramp-flat fault geometry. Lower three sections (B, C, D) show the initial, middle, and final states of a forward geometric model using Suppe’s (1983) fault-bend fold theory.
The final deformation state nearly matches depth profile in Figure 6. Second order internal shortening of Devonian and Cambrian layers are ignored by the geometric model.
125
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-18: Imbricate fault-related folding,
South Caribbean Basin, Colombia
Freddy Corredor, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Tomas Villamil1, Exploration Vice-President, Ecopetrol, Bogotá, Colombia
1
Present address: Lukoil Overseas Colombia, Ltd., Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Figure 1:
Regional topogra-
phy, bathymetry,
and tectonic ele-
ments of Colombia
and location of the
Seismic line (1)
used for this study.
126
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-18: Imbricate fault-related folding — Colombia
The Fuerte Imbricate System is located in the Southwest Caribbean Basin, beneath a large
deltaic system. This deltaic system was fed primarily by the paleo-Atrato, Sinú, and
Magdalena rivers. The northern boundary of the imbricate system is the east-west trend-
ing Canoas fault. The western limit corresponds to the South Caribbean Deformation
front. The deformation in this imbricate system began late during the Miocene(?) and
continues through the present day, resulting in its pronounced bathymetry expression
(Figure 3). The thrust sheets are composed of Miocene marine shales and turbidite sands
(Potential Reservoirs). This imbricate system is detached at the bottom of an
Oligocene(?) fine-grained section, which is a potential source rock. This system pre-
serves growth strata that records fault and fold kinematics. These growth sediments are
deposited in piggy-back basins formed over the backlimbs of individual imbricates and
as onlapping sequences against the forelimbs (Figures 2 and 3). The piggy-back stratig-
raphy consist of distal marine, fine-grained sediments and condense sections. In the
uppermost portion of the seismic profile, a spectacular Pleistocene prograding deltaic
sequence can be observed.
Figure 4: 2-D post-stack migrated and depth-converted seismic section through the imbricate system interpreted in this contribution showing some
important characteristics including: (1) Sea floor reflection, (2) Growth sedimentation, and thrust faults defined by fault-plane reflections and cutoff
(red arrows). Notice how the upper thrust fault is folded across the syncline by the lower thrust sheet.
The stratigraphic sequences imaged in the seismic profile (Figure 4) correspond to Tertiary
marine and deltaic sediments. At the bottom of the section an Oligocene(?) sequence is inter-
preted (3), and is composed of thick deep marine shale sequences (potential source rocks), and
may contain some interbedded turbidite sands (potential reservoirs in deep water environ-
ments). On seismic sections, this sequence is generally devoid of internal reflections. This for-
mation is interpreted to correspond to a weak decollement layer that undergoes an externally
imposed shear deformation in this imbricate system. Seismic reflections beneath this sequence
are generally continuous laterally, suggesting that the decollement for this system is located at
the bottom of the Oligocene(?) shale. The Oligocene(?) sequence is overlaid by Miocene-Pliocene
interbedded shallow marine shales and sandstones (4) that produce seismic reflections with
higher amplitudes and lower frequencies. In the uppermost portion of the seismic profile, a spec-
tacular Pleistocene prograding deltaic sequence can be observed (5). This deltaic sequence is
Figure 3: High resolution sea floor bathymetric image of a region north of the Fuerte Imbricate system interpreted in this contribution, not folded by the underlying imbricate system constraining the age for the end of deformation in
and regional map showing the location of (1) the bathymetric image, and (2) the seismic line across the Fuerte imbricate system. The these particular thrust sheets. Fault plane reflections and cutoffs are clearly observed (red
ridges on the southern portion of the image (3) represent northeast-trending thrust-related folds that are actively deforming the sea floor arrows) that constrain the geometry of both thrust faults. The upper thrust fault is folded by the
and controlling the course of meandering turbidity channels (4). The low regions between ridges (5) correspond to the piggy-back basins lower fault suggesting a break-forward sequence of imbrication. Break-forward imbrication
formed above the backlimbs of individual fault imbricates. On the upper right corner (6), the southern limit of the Magdalena delta system
results from a new thrust being developed in the footwall of what was previously the active
is burying these active folds and faults. The limit between these two systems corresponds to the Canoas Fault (7).
thrust.
127
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-18: Imbricate fault-related folding — Colombia
Folding vectors describe folding shear strains, which are angular measures
of the change in orientations of beds and faults across a fold limb or kink
band (see section 1B-5). Thus, folding vectors can describe the refolding of
overlying thrust sheets due to imbrication (Shaw et al., 1999; see section 1B-
5). As mentioned earlier, we observe two structural patterns in the seismic
image that are consistent with this being a break-forward imbricate system:
A) The upper thrust fault appears folded by the underlying thrust sheet,
and B) younger growth strata are folded above the frontal thrust sheet.
Using folding vectors, we test the idea that the shallow thrust sheet (red
arrows in Figure 5A) is folded by a deeper thrust.
Slip and shear on the deep thrust has produced multiple kink bands that
should have refolded the overlying thrust sheet if this is a break-forward
system. Hence, the orientation of the shallow thrust, and beds in its hang-
ing wall, should change as the thrust sheet passes over the underlying kink
bands. The folding vector method is used to predict the amount of deflec-
tion of the shallow thrust as it is refolded by the two underlying kink bands,
which are bounded by axial surfaces (A-A; B-B). If the predicted shape of
the fault is consistent with the observed fault shape, it will confirm that this
is a break-forward imbricate system.
The deflections of bedding across the deep kink bands are used to deter-
mine the folding vectors (U and V). Folding vectors are measured parallel to
axial surface orientations. In a break-forward system, folding vectors U and
V should be equal to the deflections of the shallow thrust described by vec-
tors X and Y, respectively. (Note: This method is based on conservation of
shear, and hence line length, parallel to the axial surface orientation). The
thrust fault on the right side of the section, before entering the kink band A-
A, has a dip of approximately 10°. The folding vector U is measured as the
deflection of the light blue layer (Figure 5B) across axial surface A in the
footwall of the thrust fault. The folding vector U is then used to predict the
deflection (X) of the shallow thrust fault (U = X). The predicted dip of the
folded fault above kink band A-A is 19°, consistent with the dip of the fault
plane observed in Figure 5A. Moving to the left, the thrust fault next enters
the kink band B-B at its dip of 19°. The folding vector V is measured as the
deflection of the light blue layer across the axial surface B, and is used to
predict the deflection (Y) of the shallow thrust fault across the kink band B-
B (V = Y). The predicted dip (31.5°) of the refolded fault above kink band B-
B is also consistent with the dip of the fault plane seismic reflection. This
confirms that these thrust sheets form a break-forward imbricate system.
Figure 5. Uninterpreted (A) and interpreted (B) close-up view of the Fuerte Imbricate System, offshore northern Colombia, to
illustrate how folding vectors (see section 1B-5) are used to interpret this break-forward imbricate system.
128
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-18: Imbricate fault-related folding — Colombia Part 2X: Imbricate Systems — offshore Colombia
This imbricate system can be modelled using combined conventional and shear imbricate fault-bend
folding theories. Using folding vectors we have shown on the previous page (Figure 5) that this system Incipient thrust Fault
has a break-forward sequence of imbrication. Additionally, we observe three structural patterns that
suggest shear fault-bend folding (see section 1B-4) is an important mechanism in this imbricate system
(Figure 6). The thrust sheets show gentle back-limbs that dip less than the fault ramps, growth sedi-
ments show evidences of limb rotation, and a broad anticline in the shallow thrust sheet overlies a syn-
clinal bend on the thrust fault. In simple shear fault-bend folding, the weak decollement layer
(Oligocene?) at the base of fault ramps undergoes an externally imposed bedding-parallel simple shear.
The total slip produced by the shear is accommodated by increasing slip along the fault ramps, and by
rotation along the back-limbs. Further frontal imbrication and the transfer of shear produce a decrease
in the ramp and bedding angles in younger and shallower thrust faults (Figure 7), occasionally produc-
ing folds not directly related to a fault-bend.
Figure 7: Forward model of a break-forward sequence of imbrication by forward distributed transfer of shear showing the
resulting patterns of growth sedimentation. Imbricate fault-bend fold theory describes refolding of shallow thrust sheets by
younger and deeper faults. A) an incipient thrust. B) and C) a simple shear fault-bend fold grows by increasing simple
shear across the weak decollement layer. The growth strata show evidences of limb rotation and kink band migration. D-E)
Figure 6: 2-D depth-converted seismic section through the imbricate system interpreted in this contribution showing the characteristics that suggest this system a frontal thrust sheet is formed by simple shear fault-bend folding. This additional shear produces forward (counterclock-
involves shear imbricate fault-bend folding: (1) Backlimbs dip less than fault ramps, (2) Small forelimbs compared to backlimbs, (3) Growth sedimentation show evi- wise) rotation of the shallower and younger thrust sheet, effectively decreasing the dip values of the fault ramp and folding
dences of limb rotation, and (4) Anticline is underlaid by a synclinal bend (5) in the associated thrust fault. Notice also that the upper thrust fault is folded across the bedding. A portion of the flat crest of the fold rotates forward, forming a forelimb with no associated fault-bend comparable
syncline by the lower thrust sheet, as described on the previous page. to that observed in Figure 6. The growth sediments deposited in the earlier stages are also refolded by the younger thrust.
129
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-18: Imbricate fault-related folding — Colombia
Conclusions:
• The Fuerte structure is a break-forward, shear imbricate fault-bend fold system in the southern Caribbean basin, offshore northern Colombia.
• Folding vectors are used to interpret the thrusting sequence.
• Several characteristics allow the interpretation of shear imbrication in this system, including: A) beds on the backlimbs dip less than fault ramps, B) growth sediments show evidences of both
limb rotation and kink-band migration, and C) an anticline in the shallower thrust sheet is underlied by a synclinal bend in the associated thrust fault.
• The Fuerte structure was active early during the Miocene-Pliocene with thrust faults emerging in the sea floor. Further foreland thrusting has sheared this system and passively transported it for-
ward along an Oligocene(?) basal detachment during the Pliocene to the present time.
130
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-19: Oligocene fold belt, western Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Thomas W. Bjerstedt1, ChevronTexaco Exploration, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
1Present address: U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Figure 2: (Above) SW-NE cross section through 3-D post-stack seismic volume. The location of the arbitrary line is shown in Figure 5. Shown
are over-thickened anticline core (1), backlimb erosional unconformity, and main growth phase of Nickoli structure (2). No vertical exaggeration.
131
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-19: Oligocene fold belt, western Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
A detachment anticline forms Nickoli, a typical Oligocene fold belt structure. A deep seated
detachment surface, probably late Eocene, is mappable on 2-D regional seismic throughout the
fold belt. The oldest thrusts cut the early Oligocene section. The history of the Nickoli fold includ-
ed low-angle thrusting that produced an overthickened core, rotation of the thrust backlimb and
erosion, the main growth phase, onlap by younger deposits, draping, and eventual burial. The
stratigraphic section indicated by (1) in Figure 4 is the overthickened core of the detachment anti-
cline. The section indicated by (2) onlaps the eroded surface and indicates that the main growth
phase of Nickoli fold began at the horizon interpreted to be near top of the late Oligocene Frio
interval. Frio deposystems are expected to be sand-prone, low-stand basin floor fans.
Transgressive, shale-prone, high-stand systems overlying the Frio are recognized in the western
Gulf of Mexico as the latest Oligocene Anahuac interval. The youngest thrust was detached along
the top Frio erosional surface, possibly within condensed zone(s) at the sequence boundary.
Early Miocene deposystems that drape Nickoli and other fold belt detachment structures are
expected to be shale prone as sand was diverted into lows until folds were buried completely.
Figures 5 and 6 show mapped structure and seismic time slice.
water bottom Figure 5: Structure contour map on the top Anahuac (Figure 4 labeled surface). The map contour
interval = 500 ft and the grid lines represent OCS blocks. The buttressing effect of the salt diapir to
the west rotated the Nickoli anticlinal axis to an east-west orientation. Salt withdrawl from diapirs
Figure 5 mapped surface that surround the Nickoli mini-basin overprinted the basin-center structures with normal faults.
regional detachment surface Figure 6: Showing about the same area as Figure 5. Seismic time slice near 3,050 m (10,000 ft) showing
structural configuration and position of the youngest thrust fault.
Figure 4: Annotated seismic showing regional detachment surface and detachment anticline formed by thrust faults, (1) overthickend core of regressive Frio sand-prone deposystems
(middle to late Oligocene), and erosional unconformity at the top of the Frio, and (2) onlap of Frio by Anahuac transgressive shale-prone deposystems (latest Oligocene). Early Miocene
deposits drape the fold until completely buried.
132
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-20: Edge-Sigsbee Folds, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Robert J. Alexander1, Thomas W. Bjerstedt2, and Sharon L. Moate3, ChevronTexaco, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
1Present address: BHP Billiton, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.; 2Present address: Texaco Minerals Management Service, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A; 3Present address: Consultant, Bellaire, Texas, U.S.A.
133
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-20: Edge-Sigsbee Folds, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Velocity modeling of 3-D pre-stack depth-migrated seismic line through
Keathley Canyon shows a velocity inversion and inferred over-pressured
zone. A detachment surface occurs at the base of a late Paleogene shale unit.
Edge-Sigsbee detachment anticlines are formed by lateral compression of the
sedimentary section as the salt canopy expands onto the abyssal plain gen-
erating an over-pressured zone of low strength.
Figure 3: Velocity model along annotated seismic line showing velocity inversion and inferred over-pressured section;
A) Normal model, B) High velocities are clipped to better show a subtle velocity inversion in the Tertiary age section. In
Figure 3A, red color is ~14700 ft/s (4480 m/s) and blue color is ~4980 ft/s (1518 m/s). Datum is near base Paleogene.
Figure 5: Interpreted and annotated seismic line showing a low-relief, detachment anticline in subsalt sediments at the edge of the Sigsbee Escarpment. Also
shown are interpreted faults, and a late Paleogene shale unit that is interpreted as a detachment surface at the base of an inferred over-pressured zone. Velocity
analysis modeling for pre-stack depth migration and pore pressure prediction analysis identified the velocity inversion, which probably continues further north-
ward under the salt than is shown in Figure 3.
Conclusion:
Detachment anticlines with incipient duplex structures can form the cores of low-relief, four-way closures at the
edge of the Sigsbee Escarpment, western Gulf of Mexico. Our model invokes a detachment surface in an over-
pressured section coupled with south-directed compression due to gravity gliding of the overlying salt+sediment
load. The suprajacent section is arched by the developing duplex structure in the core of the fold (i.e., between
Figure 4: Enlarged inset from Figure 5. Note duplex structure in the sediments below the base of salt (blue). Compression purple and orange lines). There is no evidence for compressional deformation south of this seismic line (left
occurs where the base of salt is “stepped,” which confirms some degree of coupling with subjacent sedimentary units. side) indicating this is analogous to a triangle zone in the foreland of fold and thrust belts.
134
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-21: Fault–related folding in reactivated offshore basins, California
Carlos Rivero and John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and
Planetary Sciences, Harvard
University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Figure 1: Location of
the San Mateo trend in
the Inner California
Borderlands. The study
area is defined by the
grid of seismic reflec-
tion data. Yellow cir-
cles are well locations.
L.A. = Los Angeles
Basin.
Figure 3: Time-migrated seismic reflection profile across the San Mateo Anticline. Stratigraphic tops are correlated from the San Clemente CH–1 well. Well-illumi-
nated cutoffs and fault plane reflections (1) constrain the location of a reactivated normal fault and overlying thrust ramps that form the San Mateo structure. Note the
Miocene syn-rift section penetrated by the well that expands toward the normal fault in a rollover structure. The rollover structure shows evidences of bivergent tec-
tonic inversion or “bipolar extrusion” (Copper and Williams, 1989; Hayward and Graham, 1989), with both fore (1) and backthrust (2) anticlines developed by the
inversion. Gently dipping continuous reflections and three-dimensional mapping define the location of the Oceanside Thrust, one of the regional Miocene detach-
ments reactivated in the Pliocene (3). Syn-extensional deposits and unconformities define the presence of other normal faults (4) that are not inverted.
135
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-21: Fault-related folding in reactivated offshore basins, California
Seismic interpretation
Figure 4: Balanced structural interpretation of the San Mateo Anticline. The interpretation highlights the relationship of the contractional structure to pre-existing normal faults reactivated during the phase of basin inversion. Kink-band domains in the back-limb of
the anticline, and direct fault plane reflections constrain the geometry of the San Mateo thrust from shallow to deeper levels, where it is linked to an older normal fault. The seismic image also indicates that the San Mateo ramp is refolded by a younger, deeper fault.
We interpret that both thrust faults terminate in structural wedges, as no foreland structures that could account for the transfer of slip exist beyond the San Mateo anticline. Formation tops from the well San Clemente #1. Labeled axial surfaces correspond to those
modeled in Figure 6.
We interpret the San Mateo Anticline as an imbricated fault-bend fold produced by the Stage 1: The San Mateo Thrust forms and
upward propagation of contractional slip from an inverted normal fault into multiple slip produces the kink-bands A-A and B-B
detachment levels (Figures 4, 5, and 6). The backlimb geometry of the anticline exhibit- that define the shallow San Mateo
ing multiple dip-domains indicates the presence of a deeper structure. This sub-thrust Anticline. A structural wedge in the thrust
structure refolds the shallow thrust sheet of the San Mateo Anticline in a way consistent termination of the upper detachment
with a break-forward system (Figure 6). The thrust front terminations of the San Mateo transfers slip back to the hinterland.
thrust and the underlying thrust are defined by two structural wedges that propagate
slip back to the hinterland. At this location, the interaction between the synclinal axial Stage 2: Development of the sub-thrust
surfaces of the upper detachments produces a complex geometry of the thrust front. structure with minor displacement that
generates incipient kink-band C-C. A lower
structural wedge is also formed in the
thrust front position, analogous to San
Mateo thrust.
Conclusions: • The phase of basin inversion also reactivated a Miocene low- • The structural style varies considerably across these inverted
angle detachment as the oceanside thrust. The oceanside basins. In some areas, the pre-inversion geometry of the
• The San Mateo anticline is an imbricated fault-bend fold origi- thrust transferred contractional slip to associated synthetic Miocene basins has not been modified, as it is expressed in
nated by basin inversion processes. The San Mateo thrust and antithetic normal structures, inverting a major graben- well-developed rollovers preserved in the hanging wall of low-
reactivated a segment of a northeast-dipping Miocene normal boundary fault, and generating a regional structural wedge angle and high-angle normal faults. In contrast, uplifting and
fault. defined by the oceanside thrust and a backthrust zone. This folding of the sedimentary fill, and reactivation of half-gra-
structural wedge controls the location of a prominent mono- bens, document the later phase of basin inversion. Footwall
cline with bathymetric expression. and hanging wall short-cuts associated with reverse and
thrust faults are also documented by the seismic data.
137
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-22: Coalinga anticline, San Joaquin basin, California, U.S.A.
Chris A. Guzofski, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Figure 2: Migrated and depth-converted seismic profile with several wells showing formation tops across the Coalinga anticline. The structural relief between the synclines (1
Figure 1: Landsat TM image of the Coalinga anticline showing the locations of the and 2) bounding the anticline (3) provides evidence that one or more southwest-dipping thrust ramps underlie the structure. The asymmetry of the central anticline (3) demon-
seismic lines used in this study. Locations of wells 1. Pleasant-Valley #1; 2. Leavitt- strates that an additional northeast-dipping thrust ramp underlies the structural crest. The absence of Tertiary deformation east of the Coalinga anticline (beyond this section)
Hintze #1; and 3. PVF-11X are shown from Meltzer (1989) and Bartow (1990). provides evidence that the southwest-dipping fault ramp or detachment does not extend basinward of the Coalinga anticline. This argues for the presence of a structural wedge,
where slip is sent back to the hinterland on the inferred backthrust beneath the Coalinga structure.
138
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-22: Coalinga anticline
We interpret the Coalinga anticline as being comprised pri-
marily of a stack of imbricated structural wedges (Figure 3).
Two structural wedges, with separate dipping forethrust
ramps and a common upper detachment surface forming a
backthrust, generate the gross morphology of the Coalinga
anticline (Figures 3 and 4). The structural relief across the
Coalinga anticline (between Pleasant Valley and the San
Joaquin basin; Figure 3) is due to the accumulation of slip
and uplift on the Coalinga thrust ramp, where the tip of the
wedge is pinned by an active synclinal axial surface (B0).
Similarly, structural relief across fold A4 to A5 in the San
Joaquin basin is due to slip on the San Joaquin thrust ramp
(Figure 4). The prominent forelimb of the Coalinga anticline
(defined by A0 to A1 in Figure 3) records slip on a fault that
has branched off of the upper detachment surface.
Figure 4: Migrated seismic line showing the location of the active synclinal axial Figure 3: Balanced structural interpretation of the Coalinga anticline, in which several imbricated faults generate the main fold. Slip on the Coalinga and San Joaquin ramps generates two
surface (A4) in the San Joaquin basin, which is used to constrain the tip of the anticlinal fault-bend folds, where slip is sent back to the hinterland on folded backthrusts. The width of the forelimb of the Coalinga structural wedge is constrained by a pair of axial surfaces
structural wedge associated with the San Joaquin thrust ramp (inset). (B0 and B1), where the wedge tip is pinned by the active synclinal axial surface (B0). Imbrication of two older and shallower thrusts by the Coalinga wedge is demonstrated by the “capture” of
fold limbs associated with these older faults by the Coalinga structural wedge. The forelimb of one of these older structures is constrained by axial surfaces C0 and C1. Growth strata within this
kink band indicate that slip on its causative fault occurred at some point between the deposition of the Moreno shale (~ 65 Ma), and the deposition of the Kreyenhagen shale (~ 37 Ma), clearly
before the development of the broad limb (B0-B1) that refolds it. A shallow thrust that branches off the main detachment generates the prominent anticlinal fault-bend fold defined by kink
bands A0 and A1. The dip of this thrust ramp was determined based on the forelimb dip using fault-bend folding theory. However, the observation that the backlimb dips less than the fault
ramp suggests that the backlimb is deforming by shear fault-bend folding mechanisms (see section 1B-4). Deformation of a shear band pinned by axial surface A2 (shaded yellow), leads to a
minor rotation of the backlimb. The location of a regional angular unconformity is shown by yellow arrows. The axis of this unconformity (i.e. where rocks change from horizontal to dipping)
is shown by a dashed yellow line. Formation depths are from Bartow (1990).
139
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-22: Coalinga anticline
Here we present a balanced sequential model of the development of the Coalinga structure (Figure 5).
Figure 5C: Initiation of the San Figure 5D: Slip on the Coalinga
Joaquin thrust ramp and develop- thrust ramp generates a structural
ment of the southwest-vergent anti- wedge (whose forelimb is defined
cline (defined by axial surfaces A0- by axial surfaces B0- B1) that cap-
A1) by slip on the backthrust associ- tures and refolds the kink bands
ated with the nascent San Joaquin associated with the deformation
structural wedge. The low angle of modeled in panels B and C. The
the backlimb of the southwest-verg- backthrusts of the Coalinga wedge
ing anticline, relative to the underly- and the San Joaquin wedge merge
ing ramp, is due to simple shear at the regional detachment, as the
fault-bend folding where e = 61° summed slip is sent back to the
(see section 1B-4). hinterland.
Conclusions:
• The Coalinga structure is underlain by two independent southwest-dipping thrust ramps that generate two structural wedges that sole
into a common backthrust/roof thrust.
• The Coalinga structural wedge refolds at least two older structures, a Tertiary structural wedge with well-defined growth strata and a
younger southwest-vergent anticline that has accumulated slip from the San Joaquin thrust ramp. While this southwest-vergent anticline
is the most prominent surface feature of the Coalinga structure, slip on the two underlying thrust ramps produce the deeper fold archi-
tecture.
140
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-23: Wedge structure, Nias Basin, Sumatra, Indonesia
Peter A. Brennan, Tellumetrics LLC, Sugar Land, Texas, U.S.A.
John H. Shaw, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
We describe a complex structure located in the Nias basin, which lies between Nias
Island and the southwest coast of Sumatra (Figure 1). Nias Island lies along the present-
day plate margin between the Indonesian and Indian Ocean plates. The basin contains
Miocene and younger sedimentary rocks deposited over a basement composed of an
earlier Tertiary subduction complex. The basin underwent a period of extension during
the early and middle Miocene, and a subsequent phase of contraction during the late
Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene. The structure we describe has been structurally
inverted, such that it reflects both extensional and contractional components.
We interpret the structural geometry and kinematics of this anticline using patterns of
syntectonic growth strata, structural relief, and fault cutoffs (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Post-stack, time-migrated and depth converted seismic reflection profile of the Nias basin that images a contractional fault-related fold. The structure
is composed of a monoclinal fold limb that is underlain by a fault, which appears to offset basement and uplift the southern portion of the fold. Two distinct
stratigraphic sections (1 and 2) thicken to the north across the fold limb, suggesting that they are syntectonic (growth) strata.
141
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-23: Structural interpretation and growth section 1 A: Seismic Example: Sumatra, Indonesia
We propose a structural wedge model (Figure 3) to explain the geometry of the structure
and the pattern of growth section 1 (Figure 4).
Based on interpreted fault cut-offs and structural relief, the main thrust ramp beneath the
Nias structure dips to the south (Figure 4A) indicating that the monoclinal fold limb is a
forelimb. The forelimb is bound by a roughly linear synclinal axial surface that extends
upward through growth section 1, and by a curved anticlinal axial surface that has dif-
ferent orientations in growth and pre-growth sections (Figure 4A). Based on this axial sur-
face pattern, we interpret the forelimb as a growth structure developed by kink-band
migration, with an active synclinal axial surface and an inactive anticlinal axial surface
(see section 1A-3). Given the fault dip direction, this growth patterns is inconsisitent with
a simple forelimb fault-bend fold model (Figure 3A), but consistent with a decollement
wedge model (Figure 3B). Thus, we interpret the structure as a decollement wedge
(Figure 4B).
Kinematic models
A: anticlinal fault-bend fold B: decollement wedge
B: Interpreted section
Figure 3: Balanced kinematic models of an anticlinal fault-bend fold (A) and decollement wedge (B). In model A, the fault-bend fold is
developed above a ramp that flattens to an upper decollement. The anticlinal axial surface is active, and thus linearly extends through pre-
growth and growth sections. The synclinal axial surface is inactive, and thus changes orientation at the boundary between growth and pre-
growth section (see section 1B-1). In model B, slip on the upper detachment is transferred to a backthrust forming a structural wedge
(Medwedeff, 1989) (see section 1B-6). The synclinal axial surface is active and the anticlinal axial surface is inactive, in contrast to model A.
Thus, simple anticlinal fault-bend folds and structural wedges can be readily distinguished based on patterns of growth strata.
Figure 4: Seismic reflection profile across the Nias basin structure with: A) basic interpretations of the fault
position, axial surface traces, and growth sections; and B) structural interpretation. The geometries of the syn-
clinal and anticlinal axial surface resemble those in Figure 3B, indicating that the structure is a decollement
wedge. In this interpretation, the synclinal axial surface is pinned to the wedge tip, and the backthrust generally
conforms to the bed dips in its hanging wall. This interpretations is consistent with the pattern of growth section
1, but does not yet explain the origins of growth section 2.
142
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-23: Structural interpretation and growth section 2
The structural wedge interpretation presented on the previous page (Figure 4B)
explained the pattern of growth section 1, but did not address the origin and pattern of Interpreted section with inverted normal fault
growth section 2. Two scenarios may explain this older growth structure. First, the older
growth structure may reflect an early phase of contractional folding above the fore-
thrust, developing as a structural wedge or perhaps a fault-propagation fold.
Alternatively, the early growth structure could represent synrift fill of an extensional half
graben developed by normal motion on the fault. Growth section 2 is middle Miocene in
age, corresponding to a period of regional extension. Thus, we prefer the second sce-
nario to explain the origin of the older growth structure. This implies that the structure
is inverted, with a middle Miocene phase of extension followed by an upper Miocene
phase of contraction. This structural inversion in modeled in Figure 5 and interpreted on
the seismic section in Figure 6.
Kinematic model
Figure 6: Interpreted seismic profile, showing an inverted half graben in the core of the Nias anticline. Growth section 2 is
interpreted as synrift strata, similar to the model shown in Figure 5.
Conclusions:
• Nias anticline formed by inversion of a Miocene normal fault and associated half
graben.
• Thrust motion on the inverted normal fault is transferred to a backthrust at the
base of the post-rift sequence, forming a structural wedge.
• Patterns of folded syntectonic growth strata were used to decipher the inver-
sion history, and to support our kinematic interpretation of this structural
wedge.
Figure 5: Sequential kinematic model (stages 0 through 5) of the development of the Nias anticline. Model 0 shows an incipient normal
fault and active axial surface. Slip on the normal fault (models 1–2) generates a roll-over panel and half graben, which is filled with synrift
strata equivalent to growth section 2. In model 3, strata are deposited above the half graben after rifting has ceased. In models 4 and 5, the
lower segment of the normal fault is reactivated as a thrust, which propagates up dip and shallows to a detachment at the base of the post-
rift sequence. Slip is transferred to a backthrust that is parallel to the overlying strata, forming a structural wedge.
143
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-24: Interference Structure, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Rion H. Camerlo, ChevronTexaco, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Thomas W. Bjerstedt, Minerals Management Service, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Edward F. Benson, NuTec Energy Services, Stafford, Texas, U.S.A.
144
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-24: Interference structure, Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Figure 4: Profile-plane vertical seismic sections B-B through D-D, uninterpreted and interpreted. Colored dashed lines
are axial surfaces. All normal faults are omitted for simplification. Line C-C shows the linkage of kink band “X” and kink
band “Z”. Line B-B’ shows distortion of the kink bands above the lower Eocene detachment at their intersection point prior
to crossing in line A-A (Figure 7). No vertical exaggeration.
145
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-24: Interference structure,
Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.
Vertical seismic profile shows interpreted structure resulting from
the interference of two kink bands and it is similar to structures
observed in nature. Displacement gradients along the kink bands in
map view are modified by the interaction of the interfering kink
bands and influenced by the mechanical stratigraphy.
Figure 7: Line A-A interpreted. Dashed blue lines are axial surfaces (kink planes). Kink band annotation follows the naming convention of Medwedeff and Suppe (1997). The two tan col-
ored horizons were added to show details of the kink bands’ intersection. An additional kink band (labeled 33X11T), and requisite branch points P5 and P6, are deviations from the model
geometry. No vertical exaggeration.
Conclusions:
• The reflection seismic data illuminates megascopic-scale kink bands.
• The geometric fold model of kink-band interference agrees well with the observed structure and is a very useful tool in
interpretation.
Figure 6: Color-filled contours of amount of shortening across kink bands, in ft. Total • Appreciable deviations from the geometric model result from effects of the mechanical stratigraphy. Weak layers influ-
displacement across both kink bands is shown in red text. Blue arrows indicate the loca- ence, and may control, the location of kink-band intersections.
tion of measurement locations in addition to those of the cross sections. • Kink bands intersect and interact in relay similar to published examples of faults, folds, and fractures.
146
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-25: End members of gravitational fold and thrust belts
(GFTBs) in the deep waters of Brazil
Pedro Victor Zalán, PETROBRAS/E&P/E&P-CORP/TSP,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ed to short-lived, linked extensional-compressional systems, is dominated by high rates of sedimentation. Thus, deformation
rates are also higher, giving rise to very thick, harmonically folded and thrusted sedimentary strata, displaying simpler syn-
Location: Deep waters of Brazil growth relationships. In this case, thick syn-tectonic packages are deposited in the synclines and thinner (or absent) correl-
Topics: Gravitational fault-related folding, growth strata ative packages on the anticlines. Time-transgressive unconformities are markedly absent. This type is illustrated by seismic
sections from two major Miocene-Recent progradational sedimentary cones: the Amazon Mouth and the Rio Grande (Figure
1). The four cases presented in this section (2-25) are shale-detached/shale-cored fold belts.
Gravitational fold and thrust belts (GFTBs) associated to linked exten-
sional-compressional systems occur in the deep waters offshore Development of Passive Margins and GFTBs
Brazil, and show two end members regarding structural and synde-
Continental margins build outward into deep and ultra-deep waters via denudation of the adjoining shields and deposition of
positional styles. One end member, related to longer-lived linked
the resulting debris, forming the continental shelves and slopes. The rifted/thinned edge of the continental plates cool expo-
extensional-compressional systems, is dominated by low rates of sed-
nentially as they move away from the heat source (mid-oceanic ridges) that initiated break-up of the continental plate. These
imentation. Thus, deformation rates are also low, giving rise to fold
continuous events create a very unstable situation since large volumes of sediments pile up at the margin of the continental
belts with growth folds topped by a series of younging- and stepping-
shelves, in the upper slope, at the same time the whole area is gradually tilting oceanward due to thermal flexural bending.
upward time-transgressive unconformities separating strongly
Large deltaic deposits of major rivers may create similar unstable conditions. Gravity failure occurs and allochtonous mass-
deformed (below) and non-deformed (above) strata of the same age
es of sediments slide down the slope, over a ductile lithology that detaches the traveling rocks above from the autochtonous
(growth strata). This fold belt type is well illustrated by a seismic sec-
rocks below. When the frontal parts of the allochton diminish their velocity due either to a decrease in the gradient of such
tion from the Pará-Maranhão Basin, as well as by another seismic line
from the Barreirinhas Basin (Figure 1). The other end member, relat-
147
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-25: GFTBs in the deep waters of Brazil The translational domain is a predominantly non-deformed region that passively traveled over the detachment zone. Weak
arching may affect the rocks present in this area. Usually, increasing amounts of detachment folding occur oceanwards/bas-
detachment zone or to a physical barrier (commonly a volcanic inwards, marking the passage of the translational domain into the compressional realm.
edifice) the incoming allochtons collide and strong contrac-
tion/compression occurs. The compressional domain may present spectacular deformation, with all kinds of reverse and thrust faults and fault-relat-
ed folding (detachment, fault-propagation, and fault-bend folding). When detached on shales, the structural styles, the struc-
The sliding of huge masses of recently deposited, slightly tural relief, and the overall dimensions may resemble those found in truly orogenic belts (Zalán, 1998). When salt is the lubri-
indurated sedimentary rocks takes place along well defined, cant, or is otherwise involved, deformation is more complex and salt tongues and canopies (Rowan et al., 2001) or nappes
seismically evident, closely spaced detachment zones, nucle- (Hudec et al., 2001) develop. The specific name gravitational fold and thrust belts (GFTBs) has been applied to such enti-
ated in ductile beds with regional distribution; salt or thick ties. Zalán (1999) studied some Brazilian GFTBs in detail and devised a tripartite structural model that predicts an orderly
laminated shales. The detachment zones provide the linkage succession, from the internides to the foreland, of detachment folding, followed by closely spaced high-angle reverse faults
between the extensional and compressional provinces. When and associated tight fault-propagation folds (also referred to as toe thrusts), ending in more widely spaced, low-angle ramp-
in significant volumes, the ductile beds may be involved in the flat thrusts with associated more open fault-bend folding. Important oil discoveries have been achieved in these compres-
folding, giving rise to huge diapir-nucleated folds. The nature sional provinces in deep waters off GOM, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil.
of the detachment zone is the main factor determining the
structural style of the associated GFTB. They may be of two The dimensions of these three domains may vary greatly. Usually the extensional and compressional domains are the widest
strikingly different types: (a) salt-detached/salt-cored fold but it is very difficult to exactly balance the amount of extension updip with the amount of contraction downdip, because of
belts, e.g. the Perdido and Mississippi Fan fold belts (GOM) the details of the severe deformation that is usually non-resolvable by seismic data. Since they cover huge areas, on the order
(Trudgill et al., 1999), and (b) shale-detached/shale-cored fold- of several thousand square kilometers, it is difficult to have them all covered by 3-D seismic, and it is not unusual that exten-
belts, e.g. the Mexican Ridges (GOM) (Trudgill et al., 1999), sion and compression are divided into two or three belts of deformation.
Amazon Cone (Silva and Maciel, 1998) and Niger Delta
(Hermann, 1998) fold belts. The failure occurs when vertical
stresses due to overburden are weakened in relation to sub-
horizontal stresses due to several possibilities, including over-
pressure in shales (due to petroleum generation or any other
classical overpressure mechanism) or ductile flow in salt.
Shear stresses develop parallel to the slightly dipping bedding
and overcome the vertical stresses.
149
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-25: GFTBs in the deep waters of Brazil
Within the GFTB fault-bend folds are concentrated in the frontal Figure 6: Time-migrated seismic section
part while fault-propagation folds occur in the middle part (Figure from the Barreirinhas GFTB. Two major
4). Detachment folds occur in the innermost part of the fold belt. open folds associated to thrust faults (red
Three reflectors can be tentatively correlated across four time-trans- arrows) can be clearly seen and are cov-
ered by sub-horizontal onlapping sedi-
gressive unconformities (dark yellow) (Figure 5). These reflectors mentary packages (yellow arrows).
(dark green, purple, and blue) are interpreted to encompass the
growth strata associated to this GFTB. They thin onto the highest
topography of the fold belt and thicken away into the lower sur-
rounding areas. In contrast, lower beds involved in the compres-
sional deformation (light green and orange reflectors) show con-
stant thickness throughout the fold belt and are interpreted as pre-
growth strata.
150
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-25: GFTBs in the deep waters of Brazil
GFTBs Without Growth Folding Figure 9: Detailed view of the GFTB shown in
Some GFTBs do not display the complicated pattern of time-transgressive Figure 8, displaying the internal architecture and
structural styles of the compressional domain.
unconformities as described above. They involve thick packages of sediments
Tight fault-propagation folds associated with
that are folded and thrusted harmonically. Syntectonic sedimentation seems reverse faults dominate the external (right) part
to follow a simpler pattern of being confined to intervening synclines between of the fold belt, while detachment folds nucleat-
anticlines. In this case, the syncline packages typically thicken downward ed by shale diapirs constitute the dominant style
towards the depocenter and thin upward towards the anticlines. Such is the in the internal (left) part of the fold belt.
case in the GFTBs related to the Amazon Mouth (Figures 8, 9, and 10), to the
Rio Grande Cone (Figures 11, 12, and 13) and to the Niger delta, where all
allochtonous sediments are harmonically folded and thrusted up out in the
sea bottom. They are situated in front of young (Miocene) and huge deltas
where enormous piles of sediments accumulated very quickly while gravity
sliding was taking place during the same short time.
The pattern of harmonically folded and thrusted sediments, with thick syn-tec-
tonic packages in the synclines (Figures 10 and 13) and thinner correlative
packages on the anticlines, and more importantly, the absence of time-trans-
gressive unconformities, are here interpreted as being diagnostic of gravity
sliding/contraction in areas dominated by high rates of deformation and sedi-
mentation.
Figure 8: Time-migrated seismic section from the Amazon Mouth GFTB. Extensional domain is only partly shown.
Translational and compressional domains are fully displayed.
151
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
2-25: GFTBs in the deep waters of Brazil
Conclusions: Figure 12: Detailed view of the
GFTB shown in Figure 11, displaying
• Gravitational fold and thrust belts associated to extensional-compressional the internal architecture and struc-
systems linked via detachment zones nucleated in shales, in the Brazilian deep tural styles of the compressional
and ultra-deep waters, show two end members as related to structural styles domain. A train of harmonically fold-
and syntectonic sedimentation. ed anticlines dominate the fold belt.
Fault-propagation folds associated to
reverse faults are preponderant in the
• GFTBs developed in continental margins dominated by low rates of sedimen- external (right) part of the fold belt,
tation/deformation display a zonation of fault-bend folding in the more exter- while a detachment anticline, partly
nal parts passing through fault-propagation folding and to detachment folding ruptured by reverse faults, can be
as one moves backwards into the internal zones. Stepping-upward time-trans- seen in the internal (center) part of
gressive unconformities cover the folded/thrusted assemblages and are the fold belt.
onlapped in the frontal parts of the folds by sub-horizontal growth strata,
whose time-equivalent packages are involved in the compressional deforma-
tion below the unconformities in the back limbs of the innermost folds.
Figure 11: Time-migrated seismic section from the Rio Grande Cone. Extensional domain is only partly shown.
Translational domain is practically non-existent. Compressional domain is fully illustrated.
152
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
2-25: GFTBs in the deep waters of Brazil
Conclusions: (cont.)
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Petrobras for the permission to pub-
lish this work and my colleagues Haroldo M. Ramos, Sergio
Rogerio P. da Silva, Alvaro Henrique A. de Castro, Desiderio
P. Silveira, Sergio de O. Guimarães, and Marcia de B.
Pimentel for their help in the processing, interpretation, and
drawing of the seismic sections.
153
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
References Imbricate Thrust Systems Using Growth Strata in the Deep-Water the deep-water western Gulf of Mexico [abs.]: AAPG Annual Con-
Niger Delta, [abs]: AAPG Annual Convention Program, Denver, Col- vention Official Program, p. A62–A63.
Allmendinger, R. W., 1998, Inverse and forward numerical modeling of orado, U.S.A. Hamilton, W., 1979, Tectonics of the Indonesian region: United States
trishear fault-propagation folds: Tectonics, v. 17, no. 4, p. 640–656. Crawford, M. F., W. G. Brown, N. Donovan, and K. Morgan, 1990, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1078, 345 p.
Apotria, T. G., and M. S. Wilkerson, 2002, Seismic expression and kine- Remote sensing techniques applied to structural geology and oil Hardeman, W. D., 1966, Geologic Map of Tennessee, Scale 1:250,000:
matics of a fault-related fold termination: Rosario structure, Mara- exploration in south-central Oklahoma: Geological Society of Amer- State of Tennessee, Department of Conservation, Division of Geology.
caibo Basin, Venezuela, in M. S. Wilkerson, M. P. Fischer, and T. G. ica Field Trip Guidebook, 116 p. Hardy, S., and M. Ford, 1997, Numerical modeling of trishear fault-
Apotria, eds., Fault Related Folding: The Transition from 2-D to 3-D: Crouch, J. K., and J. Suppe, 1993, Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of propagation folding and associated growth strata: Tectonics, v. 16,
Journal of Structural Geology Special Issue, v. 24, no. 4, p. 671–687. the Los Angeles basin and inner California borderland: A model for no. 5, p. 841–854.
Aymard, R., L. Pimentel, P. Eitz, P. Lopéz, A. Chaouch, J. Navarro, J. core complex-like crustal extension: Geological Society of America Hardy, S., and J. Poblet, 1994, Geometric and numerical model of pro-
Mijares, and J. G. Pereira, 1990, Geological Integration and Evalua- Bulletin, v. 105, p. 1415–1434. gressive limb rotation in detachment folds: Geology, v. 22, p. 371–
tion of Northern Monagas, Eastern Venezuelan Basin: in J. Brooks, Dahlstrom, C. D. A., 1969, Balanced cross sections: Canadian Journal of 374.
ed., Classic Petroleum Provinces: Geological Society of London, Earth Sciences, v. 6, p. 743–757. Hardy, S., and J. Poblet, 1995, The velocity description of deformation,
Blackwell, Sp., Pub, no. 50, p. 37–53. Dahlstrom, C. D. A., 1970, Structural geology in the eastern margin of Paper 2: Sediment geometries associated with fault-bend and fault-
Bischke, R. E., M. Morales, B. A. Ascanio, D. C. Metzner, and P. Verrall, the Canadian Rocky Mountains: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum propagation folds: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 12, p. 165–176.
1997, The recognition of a duplex with imbricate thrusting in the Geology, v. 17, p. 326–346. Hardy, S., J. Poblet, K. McClay, and D. Waltham, 1996, Mathematical
Furrial-Tejero Trend, North Monagas area, Venezuela: AAPG Abst. Dahlstrom, C. D. A.,1990, Geometric constraints derived from the law modeling of growth strata associated with fault-related fold struc-
p. A15. of conservation volume and applied to evolutionary models for tures, in Modern developments in structural interpretation, Valida-
Bally, A. W., P. L. Gordy, and G. A. Stewart, 1966, Structure, seismic detachment folding: AAPG Bulletin, v. 74, p. 336–344. tion and modeling, Buchanan, P. G., and D. A. Nieuwland, eds.: Geo-
data, and orogenic evolution of southern Canadian Rocky Moun- Dengo, G., 1985, Mid-America: Tectonic setting for the Pacific margin logical Society of London Special Publication no. 99, p. 265–282.
tains: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 14, p. from southern Mexico to northwestern Colombia, in A. E. M. Nairn, Harris, L. D., and R. C. Milici, 1977, Characteristics of thin-skinned style
337–381. and F. G. Stehli, eds., The ocean basins and margins, v. 7: New York, of deformation in the southern Appalachians, and potential hy-
Bartow, J. A., 1990, A summary of the Cenozoic stratigraphy and geo- Plenum Press, p. 123–180. drocarbon traps: United States Geological Survey Professional
logic history of the Coalinga region, Central California, in The Dengo, C. A., and M. L. Covey, 1993, Structure of the Eastern Cordillera Paper 1018, 40 p.
Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983, M. J. Rymer, and of Columbia: AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, p. 1315–1337. Hayward, A. B. and R. H. Graham, 1989, Some geometrical characteris-
W. L. Ellsworth, eds., U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, Dewey, J. F., 1965, Nature and origin of kink bands: Tectonophysics, tics of inversion, in M. A. Cooper, and G. D. Williams, eds., Inversion
Report: P 1487, p. 3–12. 1/6, p. 459–494. Tectonics: Geological Society Special Publication 44, p. 17–40.
Boyer, S. E., and D. Elliot, 1982, Thrust systems: AAPG Bulletin, v. 66, Diegel, F. A., J. F. Karlo, D. C. Schuster, R. C. Shoup, and P. R. Tauvers, Hermann, L., 1998, Deep offshore West Niger Delta slope, Nigeria:
p. 1196–1230. 1995, Cenozoic structural evolution and tectono-stratigraphic frame- Structural styles and hydrocarbon reservoirs: AAPG International
Carnevali, J., 1988, Geology of new giant oil fields in mountain front of work of the northern Gulf Coast continental margin, in M. P. A. Jack- Conference and Exhibition Extended Abstracts Volume, Rio de Ja-
northeastern Venezuela: Proceedings, 28th International Geological son, D. G. Roberts, and S. Snelson, eds., Salt Tectonics: a Global Per- neiro, Brazil, p. 18–19.
Congress, Washington, 9–19 July, v. 1, p. 1240–1241. spective: AAPG Memoir 65, p. 109–151. Hudec, M. R., M. P. A. Jackson, L. F. Binga, J. C. da Silva, R. Fraenkl, and
Connors, C. D., D. B. Denson, G. Kristiansen, and D. M. Angstadt, 1998, Eisenstadt, G., and D. G. DePaor, 1987, Alternative model of thrust fault W. Sikkema, 2001, Regional restoration in the offshore Kwanza
Compressive Anticlines of the Mid-outer Slope, Central Niger Delta propagation, Geology, v. 15, p. 630–633. Basin, Angola: Linked zones of extension, translation, and contrac-
(abs.): AAPG International Conf., AAPG Bulletin, v. 82, no. 10, p. Elliott, D., 1976, The motion of thrust sheets: Journal of Geophysical tion: AAPG Annual Convention Official Program Book and CD-ROM,
1883–1984 Research, v. 81, p. 949–963. Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., June, p. A95.
Cooper, M. A., F. T. Addison, R. Alvarez, M. Coral, R. H. Graham, A. B. Epard, J.-L., and R. H. Groshong, 1993, Excess area and depth to Hyndman, R. D., G. D. Spence, T. Yuan, and E. E. Davis, 1994, Regional
Hayward, S. Howe, J. Martinez, J. Naar, R. Peñas, A. J. Pulham, and detachment: AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, p. 1291–1302. geophysics and structural framework of the Vancouver Island mar-
A. Taborda, 1995, Basin development and tectonic history of the gin accretionary prism: Proceeds of the Ocean Drilling Program,
Epard, J.-L., and R. H. Groshong, 1995, Kinematic model of detachment
Llanos basin, Eastern Cordiller, and Middle Magdalena valley, Part A: Initial Reports, v. 146, p. 399–419.
folding including limb rotation, fixed hinges, and layer-parallel
Colombia: AAPG Bulletin, v. 79, p. 1421–1443. Jamison, W. R., 1987, Geometric analysis of fold development in over-
strain: Tectonophysics, v. 247 (1-4), p. 85–103.
Cooper, M. A., and G. D. Williams, Inversion Tectonics: Geological Soci- thrust terranes: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 9, p. 207–219.
Erslev, E. A., 1991, Trishear fault-propagation folding: Geology, v. 19,
ety Special Publication 44, p. 375. Lang, R. C., 1957, The Criner Hills: a key to the geologic history of
no. 6, p. 617–620.
Corredor, F., J. H. Shaw, and F. Bilotti, 2002, Imbricate Shear Fault-bend southern Oklahoma: Ardmore Geological Society Guidebook—
Gutierrez, R., 1986, Nuevas espectativas en la subcuenca de Maturín,
Folding in the Deep-water Niger Delta, [abs}: GSA Annual Meeting, Criner Hills Field Conference, p. 18–25.
Cuenca Oriental de Venezuela. ARPEL, LX, RANE, tomo II Lima Perú.
Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. Mastoris, S., 1989, 3-D seismic interpretation techniques define shal-
Hall, S. H., 2000, The development of large-scale sub-salt structures in
Corredor, F., J. H. Shaw, and F. Bilotti, 2001, Modeling of Complex low gas sand reservoirs: Oil and Gas Journal, v. 87, p. 69–73.
154
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies
References (Con’t.) Mount, V. S., J. Suppe, and S. C. Hook, 1990, A forward modeling strat- Rivero, C., J. H. Shaw, and K. Mueller, 2000, Oceanside and Thirtymile
Medwedeff, D. A., 1985, Lateral terminations of fault-related folds: Ge- egy for balanced cross sections: AAPG Bulletin, v. 74, no. 5, p. Bank blind thrusts: Implications for earthquake hazards in coastal
ological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 17, p. 661. 521–531. southern California: Geology, v. 28, p. 891–894.
Medwedeff, D. A., 1988, Structural analysis and tectonic significance of Namson, J., and T. L. Davis, 1988, A structural transect of the western Roure, F., J. Carnevali, Y. Gou, and T. Subieta, 1994, Geometry and kine-
Late-Tertiary and Quaternary compressive growth folding, San Transverse Ranges, California: Implications for lithospheric kine- matics of the North Monagas thrust belt (Venezuela): Marine and Pe-
Joaquin Valley, California: Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, matics and seismic risk evaluation: Geology, v. 16, p. 675–679. troleum Geology 1994, v. 11, no. 3, p. 347–362.
Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A. 184 p. Narr, W., and J. Suppe, 1994, Kinematics of basement-involved com- Roure, F., B. Colletta, B. DeToni, D. Loureiro, H. Passalacqua, and Y. Gou,
Medwedeff, D. A., 1989, Growth fault-bend folding at southeast Lost pressive structures: American Journal of Science, 294, v. 802–860. 1997, Within-plate deformations in the Maracaibo and East Zulia
Hills, San Joaquin Valley, California: AAPG Bulletin, v. 73, p. 54–67. Nicholson, C., C. Sorlien, and M. Legg, 1993, Crustal imaging and Basins, Western Venezuela: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 14, p.
Medwedeff, D. A., 1992, Geometry and kinematics of an active, lateral- extreme Miocene extension of the Inner California Continental Bor- 139–163.
ly propagating wedge thrust, Wheeler Ridge, California, in S. Mitra derland: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. Rowan, M. G., 1997, Three-dimensional geometry and evolution of a seg-
and G. Fisher, eds., Structural Geology of Fold and Thrust Belts, 25, p. A–418. mented detachment fold, Mississippi Fan foldbelt, Gulf of Mexico:
John Hopkins University Press. p. 3–28. Novoa, E., J. Suppe, and J. H. Shaw, 2000, Inclined-shear restoration of Journal of Structural Geology, v. 19, p. 463–480.
Medwedeff, D. A. and J. Suppe, 1997, Multibend fault-bend folding: growth folds: AAPG Bulletin, v. 84, no. 6, p. 787–804. Rowan, M. G., A. Leibold, A. Maccagni, and G. Valenti, 2001,
Journal of Structural Geology, 19, p. 279–292. Novoa, E., V. Mount, and J. Suppe, 1998, Map-view interference of mon- Allochthonous salt, contractional folds, and turtle structures of the
Meltzer, A., 1989, Crustal structure and tectonic evolution: Central Cal- oclinal folds: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 20, no. 4, p. 339–353. Louisiana deepwater province [abs.]: AAPG Annual Convention Offi-
ifornia, Ph.D. thesis, Rice University, Houston, Texas, U.S.A. Parnaud, F., Y. Gou, J. C. Pascual, I. Truskowski, O. Gallango, and H. cial Program, v. 10, p. A173.
Mitra, S., 1993, Geometry and kinematic evolution of inversion struc- Passalacqua, 1995, Petroleum geology of the central part of the Rowan, M. G., and R. Linares, 2000, Fold evolution matrices and axial sur-
tures: AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, p. 1159–1191. eastern Venezuela basin, in A. J. Tankard, R. Suarez S., and H. J. face analysis of fault-bend folds: Application to the Medina anticline,
Welsink, eds., Petroleum basins of South America: AAPG Memoir 62, eastern Cordillera, Colombia: AAPG Bulletin, v. 84, no. 6, p. 741–764.
Mitra, S., and Q. T. Islam, 1994, Experimental (clay) models of inver-
sion structures: Tectonophysics, v. 230, p. 211–222. p. 741–756. Rowan, M. G., F. J. Peel, and B. C. Vendeville, 2001, Gravity-driven fold
Paterson, M. S., and L. E. Weiss, 1966, Experimental deformation and belts on passive margins: AAPG Annual Convention Official Program
Molina, A., 1992, Rosario Field, Venezuela, Maracaibo Basin, Zulia
folding in phyllite: Geological Society of America Bulletin, 77, p. Book and CD-ROM, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., June, p. A174.
State, in N. H. Foster and E. A. Beaumont, eds.: AAPG Treatise of
Petroleum Geology, Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields, Structural Traps VI, 343–374. Rowan, M. G., F. J. Peel, and B. C. Vendeville, 2004, Gravity-driven fold
p. 293–304. Peel, F. J., 2001, Emplacement, inflation, and folding of an extensive belts on passive margins, in K. R. McClay, ed., Thrust tectonics and
allochthonous salt sheet in the late Mesozoic (ultra-deepwater Gulf hydrocarbon systems: AAPG Memoir 82, p. 157–182.
Moore, G. F., D. E. Karig, T. H. Shipley, A. Taira, P. L. Stoffa, and W. T.
Wood, 1991, Structural framework of the ODP Leg 131 area, Nankai of Mexico) [abs.]: AAPG Annual Convention. Rowan, M. G., B. D. Trudgill, and J. C. Fiduk, 2000, Deep-water, salt-cored
Trough: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Part A: Initial Peel, F. J., C. J. Travis, and J. R. Hossack, 1995, Genetic structural fold belts: Lessons from the Mississippi Fan and Perdido foldbelts,
Reports, v. 131, p. 15–20. provinces and salt tectonics of the Cenozoic offshore U.S. Gulf of northern Gulf of Mexico, in W. Mohriak and M. Talwani, eds., Atlantic
Mexico: A preliminary analysis, in M. P. A. Jackson, D. G. Roberts, Rifts and Continental Margins: American Geophysical Union Geo-
Moore, G. F., A. Taira, S. Kuramoto, T. H. Shipley, and N. L. Bangs, 1999,
and S. Snelson, eds., Salt Tectonics: a Global Perspective: AAPG physical Monograph 115, p. 173–191.
Strucutural setting of the 1999 U.S.-Japan Nankai Trough 3-D seismic
reflection survey: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Memoir 65, p. 153–175. Salvini, F., F. Storti, and K. McClay, 2001, Self-determining numerical
Union v. 80, p. F569. Poblet, J., K. McClay, F. Storti, and J. A. Muñoz, 1997, Geometries of modeling of compressional fault-bend folding: Geology, v. 29, p.
syntectonic sediments associated with single layer detachment 839–842.
Moore, G. F., et al., 2002, Data report: Structural setting of the Leg 190
Muroto transect, in G. F. Moore, A. Taira, and A. Klaus, et al.: Pro- folds: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 19, p. 369–381. Shaw, J. H., F. Bilotti, and P. Brennan, 1999, Patterns of imbricate thrust-
ceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, v. 190, Price, R. A., 1981, The Cordilleran foreland thrust and fold belt in the ing: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 111, no. 7, p. 1140–1154.
http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/190_IR/chap_02/chap_02. southern Canadian Rocky Mountains, in K. R. McClay, and N. J. Shaw, J. H., S. C. Hook, and J. Suppe, 1994, Structural trend analysis by
htm (accessed July 19, 2004). Price, eds., Thrust and Nappe Tectonics: Geological Society of Lon- axial surface mapping: AAPG Bulletin, v. 78, p. 700–721.
Morgan, J. K., and D. E. Karig, 1995, Kinematics and a balanced and don, Special Publication no. 9, p. 427–448. Shaw, J. H., S. C. Hook, and J. Suppe, 1996, Structural trend analysis by
restored cross-section across the toe of the eastern Nankai accre- Prieto, R., and G. Valdes, 1990, El Furrial Oil Field a New Giant an Old axial surface mapping: Reply, v. 80/5, p. 780–787.
tionary prism: Journal of Structural Geology, 17, p. 31–45. Basin: Abstract. Shaw, J. H., S. C. Hook, and B. Satrio, 1997, Complex structural reacti-
Mount, V., 1989, State of stress in California and a seismic structural Rich, J. L., 1934, Mechanics of low-angle overthrust faulting as illus- vation defined by growth strata: AAPG Annual Meeting Abstracts, v.
analysis of the Perdido fold belt, Northwest Gulf of Mexico: Ph.D. trated by Cumberland Thrust Block, Virginia, Kentucky and Ten- 6, p. 106.
dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A. nessee: AAPG Bulletin, v. 18, p. 1684–1696.
155
Part 2: Case Studies Seismic Interpretation of Contractional Fault-Related Folds
References (Con’t.) Suppe, J., 1983, Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding: Ameri- Trudgill, B. D., et al., 1999, The Perdido Fold Belt, northwestern deep
Shaw, J. H., E. Novoa, and C. Connors, 2004, Structural controls on can Journal of Science, v. 283, p. 684–721. Gulf of Mexico, Part 1: Structural geometry, evolution and regional
growth stratigraphy in contractional fault-related folds, in K. R. Suppe, J., 1985, Principles of Structural Geology: Englewood Cliffs, New implications: AAPG Bulletin., v. 83, p. 88–112.
McClay, ed., Thrust tectonics and hydrocarbon systems: AAPG Jersey, U.S.A., Prentice-Hall, 537 p. Weimer, P., and R. Buffler, 1992, Structural geology and evolution of
Memoir 82, p. 400–412. Suppe, J., and D. A. Medwedeff, 1990, Geometry and kinematics of fault- the Mississippi Fan Fold Belt, deep Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Bulletin, v.
Shaw J. H., and J. Suppe, 1996, Earthquake hazards of active blind- propagation folding, Ecolg. Geol. Helv., v. 83, p. 409–454. 76, p. 225–251.
thrust faults under the central Los Angeles basin, California: Journal Suppe, J., G. T. Chou, and S. C. Hook, 1992, Rates of folding and fault- Woodward, N. B., S. E. Boyer, and J. Suppe, 1985, An outline of bal-
of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 8623–8642. ing determined from growth strata, in K. R. McClay, ed., Thrust tec- anced cross-sections: University of Tennessee, Department of Geo-
Shaw, J. H., and J. Suppe, 1994, Active faulting and growth folding in tonics: London, Chapman, and Hall, p. 105–121. logical Sciences, Studies in Geology, v. 11, 2nd ed., 170 p.
the eastern Santa Barbara Channel, California: Bulletin of Geological Suppe, J., F. Sàbat, J. A. Muñoz, J. Poblet, E. Roca, and J. Vergés, 1997, Zalán, P. V., 1998, Gravity-driven compressional structural closures in
Society of America, v. 106, p. 607–626. Bed-by-bed growth by kink band migration: Sant Llorenç de Morun- Brazilian deep-waters: A new frontier play: AAPG Annual Meeting
Silva, S. R., and R. R. Maciel, 1998, Foz do Amazonas Basin hydrocar- ys, Eastern Pyrenees: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 19, p. Extended Abstracts v. 2, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A., p. A723.
bon system: AAPG International Conference and Exhibition Extend- 443–461. Zalán, P. V., 1999, Seismic expression and internal order of gravitational
ed Abstracts Volume, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p. 480–481. Suppe, J., C. Connors, and Y. Zhang, 2004, Shear fault-bend folding, in fold and thrust belts in Brazilian deep waters (expanded abstract):
Stein, R. S., and G. Ekström, 1992, Sesmicity and Geometry of a 110- K. R. McClay, ed., Thrust tectonics and hydrocarbon systems: AAPG Sixth International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, CD-
km-long blind thrust fault, 2: Synthesis of the 1982–1985 California Memoir 82, p. 303–323. ROM with Extended abstracts, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August, 4 p.
earthquake sequence: Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, p. Talukdar S., O. Gallango, and A. Ruggiero, 1988, Generation and migra- Zalán, P. V., 2001, Growth folding in gravitational fold and thrust belts
4865–4883. tion of oil in the Maturin Subbasin Eastern Venezuela Basin. Organ- in the deep waters of the Equatorial Atlantic, Northeastern Brazil:
Stewart, K. G., and W. Alvarez, 1991, Mobile hinge kinking in layered ic Geochemistry, 13, p. 537–547. AAPG Annual Convention Official Program Book and CD-ROM, Den-
rock sand models: Journal of Structural Geology, 13, p. 243–259. Tearpock, D. J., and R. E. Bischke, 2002, Applied Subsurface Geological ver, Colorado, U.S.A., June, p. A223.
Storti, F., and J. Poblet, 1997, Growth stratal architectures associated mapping and Structural Techniques, 2nd ed.: Upper Saddle River, Zapata, T. R., and R. W. Allmendinger, 1996, Growth stratal records of
with decollement folds and fault-propagation folds: Inferences on New Jersey, U.S.A., Prentice-Hall, 850 p. instantaeous and progressive limb rotation in the Precordillera thrust
fold kinematics: Tectonophysics, 282, p. 353–373. Tomlinson, C. W., 1952, Odd geologic structures of southern Okla- belt and Bermejo Basin, Argentina: Tectonics, v. 15, no, 5, p. 1065–1083.
Stuart, C. J., and R. G. Hickman, 2001, Tertiary linked extensional and homa: AAPG Bulletin, v. 36, no. 9, p. 1820–1840.
compressional faults and sedimentation in the Krishna-Godavari Tomlinson, C. W., and W. McBee Jr., 1959, Pennsylvanian sediments
Basin, India: AAPG Annual Convention Official Program Book and and orogenies of Ardmore district, Oklahoma: Ardmore Geological
CD-ROM, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., June, p. A193. Society, Petroleum geology of southern Oklahoma, v. 2, p. 3–52.
156
Shaw, Connors, and Suppe Part 2: Case Studies