Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

CHAPTER 12 SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES

12.1.6 Material Design and Detailing Requirements same direction, other than those combinations
Structural elements including foundation elements considered as dual systems, the most stringent
shall conform to the material design and detailing applicable structural system limitations contained in
requirements set forth in Chapter 14. Table 12.2-1 shall apply and the design shall comply
with the requirements of this section.

12.2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM SELECTION 12.2.3.1 R, Cd , and Ω0 Values for


Vertical Combinations
12.2.1 Selection and Limitations Where a structure has a vertical combination in
The basic lateral and vertical seismic force-resist- the same direction, the following requirements shall
ing system shall conform to one of the types indicated apply:
in Table 12.2-1 or a combination of systems as
1. Where the lower system has a lower Response
permitted in Sections 12.2.2, 12.2.3, and 12.2.4. Each
Modification Coefficient, R, the design coefficients
type is subdivided by the types of vertical elements
(R, Ω0, and Cd) for the upper system are permitted
used to resist lateral seismic forces. The structural
to be used to calculate the forces and drifts of the
system used shall be in accordance with the structural
upper system. For the design of the lower system,
system limitations and the limits on structural height,
the design coefficients (R, Ω0, and Cd) for the
hn, contained in Table 12.2-1. The appropriate
lower system shall be used. Forces transferred from
response modification coefficient, R, overstrength
the upper system to the lower system shall be
factor, Ω0, and the deflection amplification factor, Cd,
increased by multiplying by the ratio of the higher
indicated in Table 12.2-1 shall be used in determining
response modification coefficient to the lower
the base shear, element design forces, and design
response modification coefficient.
story drift.
2. Where the upper system has a lower Response
Each selected seismic force-resisting system shall
Modification Coefficient, the Design Coefficients
be designed and detailed in accordance with the
(R, Ω0, and Cd) for the upper system shall be used
specific requirements for the system as set forth in the
for both systems.
applicable reference document listed in Table 12.2-1
and the additional requirements set forth in Chapter 14. EXCEPTIONS:
Seismic force-resisting systems not contained in
1. Rooftop structures not exceeding two stories
Table 12.2-1 are permitted provided analytical and
in height and 10 percent of the total structure
test data are submitted to the authority having
weight.
jurisdiction for approval that establish their dynamic
2. Other supported structural systems with a weight
characteristics and demonstrate their lateral force
equal to or less than 10 percent of the weight of
resistance and energy dissipation capacity to be
the structure.
equivalent to the structural systems listed in Table
3. Detached one- and two-family dwellings of
12.2-1 for equivalent values of response modification
light-frame construction.
coefficient, R, overstrength factor, Ω0, and deflection
amplification factor, Cd.
12.2.3.2 Two Stage Analysis Procedure
A two-stage equivalent lateral force procedure is
12.2.2 Combinations of Framing Systems in
permitted to be used for structures having a flexible
Different Directions
upper portion above a rigid lower portion, provided
Different seismic force-resisting systems are
the design of the structure complies with all of the
permitted to be used to resist seismic forces along
following:
each of the two orthogonal axes of the structure.
Where different systems are used, the respective R, a. The stiffness of the lower portion shall be at least
Cd, and Ω0 coefficients shall apply to each system, 10 times the stiffness of the upper portion.
including the structural system limitations contained b. The period of the entire structure shall not be
in Table 12.2-1. greater than 1.1 times the period of the upper
portion considered as a separate structure supported
12.2.3 Combinations of Framing Systems in the at the transition from the upper to the lower
Same Direction portion.
Where different seismic force-resisting systems c. The upper portion shall be designed as a separate
are used in combination to resist seismic forces in the structure using the appropriate values of R and ρ.

72
CHAPTER 12 SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES

d. The lower portion shall be designed as a separate 12.2.5.2 Cantilever Column Systems
structure using the appropriate values of R and ρ. Cantilever column systems are permitted as
The reactions from the upper portion shall be those indicated in Table 12.2-1 and as follows. The required
determined from the analysis of the upper portion axial strength of individual cantilever column ele-
amplified by the ratio of the R/ρ of the upper ments, considering only the load combinations that
portion over R/ρ of the lower portion. This ratio include seismic load effects, shall not exceed 15
shall not be less than 1.0. percent of the available axial strength, including
e. The upper portion is analyzed with the equivalent slenderness effects.
lateral force or modal response spectrum proce- Foundation and other elements used to provide
dure, and the lower portion is analyzed with the overturning resistance at the base of cantilever column
equivalent lateral force procedure. elements shall be designed to resist the seismic load
effects including overstrength factor of Section 12.4.3.
12.2.3.3 R, Cd , and Ω0 Values for Horizontal
Combinations 12.2.5.3 Inverted Pendulum-Type Structures
The value of the response modification coeffi- Regardless of the structural system selected,
cient, R, used for design in the direction under inverted pendulums as defined in Section 11.2, shall
consideration shall not be greater than the least value comply with this section. Supporting columns or piers
of R for any of the systems utilized in that direction. of inverted pendulum-type structures shall be
The deflection amplification factor, Cd, and the designed for the bending moment calculated at the
overstrength factor, Ω0, shall be consistent with R base determined using the procedures given in Section
required in that direction. 12.8 and varying uniformly to a moment at the top
EXCEPTION: Resisting elements are permitted equal to one-half the calculated bending moment at
to be designed using the least value of R for the the base.
different structural systems found in each independent
line of resistance if the following three conditions are
12.2.5.4 Increased Structural Height Limit for
met: (1) Risk Category I or II building, (2) two stories
Steel Eccentrically Braced Frames, Steel Special
or less above grade plane, and (3) use of light-frame
Concentrically Braced Frames, Steel
construction or flexible diaphragms. The value of R
Buckling-restrained Braced Frames, Steel Special
used for design of diaphragms in such structures shall
Plate Shear Walls and Special Reinforced Concrete
not be greater than the least value of R for any of the
Shear Walls
systems utilized in that same direction.
The limits on structural height, hn, in Table
12.2-1 are permitted to be increased from 160 ft (50
12.2.4 Combination Framing
m) to 240 ft (75 m) for structures assigned to Seismic
Detailing Requirements
Design Categories D or E and from 100 ft (30 m) to
Structural members common to different framing
160 ft (50 m) for structures assigned to Seismic
systems used to resist seismic forces in any direction
Design Category F provided the seismic force-
shall be designed using the detailing requirements
resisting systems are limited to steel eccentrically
of Chapter 12 required by the highest response
braced frames, steel special concentrically braced
modification coefficient, R, of the connected framing
frames, steel buckling-restrained braced frames, steel
systems.
special plate shear walls, or special reinforced
concrete cast-in-place shear walls and both of the
12.2.5 System Specific Requirements
following requirements are met:
The structural framing system shall also comply
with the following system specific requirements of 1. The structure shall not have an extreme torsional
this section. irregularity as defined in Table 12.2-1 (horizontal
structural irregularity Type 1b).
12.2.5.1 Dual System 2. The steel eccentrically braced frames, steel special
For a dual system, the moment frames shall be concentrically braced frames, steel buckling-
capable of resisting at least 25 percent of the design restrained braced frames, steel special plate shear
seismic forces. The total seismic force resistance is to walls or special reinforced cast-in-place concrete
be provided by the combination of the moment frames shear walls in any one plane shall resist no more
and the shear walls or braced frames in proportion to than 60 percent of the total seismic forces in each
their rigidities. direction, neglecting accidental torsional effects.

78

Вам также может понравиться