1. SANTOS V.

PIZARRO
DULAY V. CA
2. QUASI DELICT
 ELEMENTS OF QUASI DELICT
- AIR FRANCE V. CAROSCOSSO
 QASI DELICT V. CULPA CONTRACTUAL
- CALALAS V. CA ( GR NO. 122039)
3. EFFEECT OF ACQUITTAL-ON THE QUASI DELICT LIABILITY
 MANLICLIC V. CALAUNAN
4. LIABILITY OF EMPLOYER
 ART 100RPC
 2176 IN RELATION TO ART. 2180 NCC
5. ARTILE 2180 AND 2182
6. CONSTUCTION DEVT. CORP. V ESTRELLA
(GR NO. 147791)
7. LIABILITY OF COMMON CARRIER
8. EQUITTABLE LEASING CORP. V. SUYOM
9. DEL CARMEN V. BACOY
10. COMPARE SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF LAW IN RELATION TO VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF EMPLOYER FRO THE FAULT
OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE EMPLOYEE
11. VICARIOUS LIABILITY
 ARTICLES 216, 218, 219 FAMILY CODE
12. RAFAEL V. PP (GR NO. 129029)
13. WHEN IN STATE/ MUN. CORP. LAIABLE FOR TORTIOUS ACTS OF ITS EMPLOYEES
14. STATE LIABILTY
 MERITT V. GOVT.
 GUILATCO V. CITY OF DAGUPAN
 GUILATCO V. QC??? (Guilatco v. Dagupan lang nakikita ko)

OR…

GUILATCO vs. CITY OF DAGUPAN

Vs.
QUEZON CITY vs. DACARA?

 CITY OF MANILA (GR NO. 23052)

15. PICART V. SMITH

16. CONCEPT OF MORAL DAMAGES ART. 219
 CONCEPT OF EXEMPLARY AND MORAL DAMAGES
17. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
 DEFINE
 PROVE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
 LAO V. CA (GR NO. 616958-59)
 (NOTES ni sir/PABLO) TO SUPPORT AN ACTION FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION:
i. Fact of prosecution
ii. defendant was himself the prosecutor In order for a malicious
iii. That case was finally terminated with an acquittal quittal prosecution suit to prosper, the
iv. That the prosecution was without probable cause plaintiff must prove three (3)
v. That defendant was actuated or impelled by legal malice, elements: (DRILON CASE, G.R.
that is by improper or sinister motive. No. 107019, Ito)
18. ACTION FOR DAMAGES
 CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CIVIL ACTON
 INSTITUTED MALICIOUSLY AND WITHOUT PROBABL CAUSE
 (NOTES ni sir/PABLO):
 An action for damages brought by one
 Against whom a criminal prosecution or civil suit or other legal proceeding has been instituted
 Maliciously and without probable cause
 After the prosecution, civil suit or other proceeding in favor of the defendant
19. CASUPANAN V. LARUYA
20. RAMOS V. CA (GR No. 124354)
21. DEFENSES
 FORTUITUS EVENT
 ASSUMPTION OF RISK
 DUE DILIGENCE
22. BATACLAN V.
23. URBANO V. IAC
24. MACKY V. IAC
25. VESTIL V. IAC
26. TAMARO V. CA
27. CUADRA V. MONFORT
28. AMADORA V. CA
29. ST. MARY’S ACADEMY v. CARPITANOS
30. CALTEX OR CASTILEX?
 CASTILEX V. VASQUEZ
 AFRICA V. CALTEX
31. CITY OF MANILA V. TEOTICO (GR NO. L-23052)
32. MADEJA V.CARO
33. DAMNUM ABSQUE INJURIA
 AMONOY v. GUTIERREZ
34. WASSMER V. VELEZ
TANJANCO V. SANTOS
BUNAG V. CA