Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Why is it unlawful?
1. More than 19 persons; and
2. Absence of registration statement (Sec. 8)
NOTE:
1. If with goods (e.g. multi-level marketing scheme), DTI has jurisdiction
2. There is no "pyramiding" in SRC
There is "pyramiding" in Consumers Act
10:00am X to A - P1.20/share
10:02am X to B - P1.20/share
Is it illegal?
Not yet. It must first create a false or misleading appearance of active trading in the security
concerned.
When is Marking the close, Painting the tape, Squeezing the float, Hype and dump, Boiler
Room Operations become illegal?
If it is effected to either raise the price or induce the purchase of a security or of a controlling,
controlled, or commonly controlled company by others or to depress the price to induce the sale
of a security, whether of the same or of a different class, of the same issuer or of a controlling,
controlled company or common controlled company by others or to create active trading to
induce the purchase through said devices or schemes
NOTES:
1. T3 (Trading day + 3 days to comply with the obligations)
MCQ:
The sale of security or securities made by a vendor who does not own, hold or posses the shares
is called
a. Wash sale
b. Painting the tape
c. Matched order
d. Short sale
ANSWER:
d.
Case problem:
X is the owner of 1M shares are being traded at P1.00 per share. He has an account in two broker
firms, B1 and B2. He directs B1 to sell 250T shares at 10.30 at P1.25 per share and at 10.32, he
directs B2 to buy the same number of shares at the same price.
a. Can X be held liable for wash sale and matched order? Explain.
b. If he sells shares of stock which he does not own, what unlawful act will be
commit?
ANSWERS:
a. Yes.
There is wash sale because there is no change in beneficial ownership of the security
involved. In this case, a series of buy and sale transaction is placed by one and same
beneficial owner who is X in the exchange which would not affect any change of
ownership of the shares transacted.
b. He committed short sale because it is defined as selling security which the vendor does
not own which is illegal per se under Sec. 24.2 of the SRC.
Objective:
1. Define: State whether they are illegal per se or when they may become illegal.
a. Wash sale
b. Matched order
c. Short sale
ANSWERS:
a. Wash Sale – engaging in transactions in which there is no genuine change in actual
ownership of a security; prohibited conducted under Rule 24, Implementing Rules and
Regulations of the SRC
b. Matched Order – engaging in transactions where both buy and sell orders are entered at
the same time with the same price and quantity by different but colluding parties;
improper matched orders are prohibited conduct under Rule 24, IRR of the SRC; and
c. Short Sale- any sale of a security which the seller does not own or any sale which is
consummated by the delivery of a security borrowed by, or for the account of the seller.
This is not illegal per se.