Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
US SAM Developrnent
Launch Systerns *
A fully i33axmtrm*wd pide to Naval $urfa#€-t0-Air SVXissfles
fodlwtiagiffi ft@r
Yolune 6 Issue 64 &sierAirseftdto lffir
Published by
neaAm#
Orbis Publishing Ltd M&I{AT0Fnffi
@Aerospace Publishing Ltd 1984
Rilles dlFd Sa II
Editorial Offices ItiHr and l?esd[ lamb C tculi Hc trl
War Machine
Aerospace Publishing Ltd
10 Barley Mow Passage
London W4 4PH
Orbis Publishing Ltd Selenia I2&: Iioli::r- !;: re-j --:-:-- ---Er- s--: l;:.: 165: Lleutenilt KP. lvhite/Shorts.
Orbis House l2E6:RolclNawir=:aa:,;:::-1---j-: i-i'-.r:-:,;-!:rUnit. 126l:Col4,ieuteniltKP.
20-22 Bedfordbury White. l26E: Pr6.rs':]a.:.-i ,En -,* ;:-: i]:-.::: J:: 169: lneutenilt K.P. !\hite. l2?0r
London WC2N 4BT British Aerospae D-= l]lill du:H: ri- : ir-: : 1t?2: -S :;arlus NavyruS Na!T. l2l3: US
Telephone: 01-379 671 1 NavyruSNa\TruSNar::--l;rF-- :r!cr ]:-f.L: -:: [X[* -:];:ilJSNa!y. l2?5:USNa1ry'/Genera.1
Circulation Director: David Breed Dynmie. 12?6:US\:!--:l;:n i"E1r i:rri-tra:::lfli,:l;a;:-S\av/. 1229:FMCCorporatiory
Markating Director: Michael Joyce FMC Corponhotrn'l3 3::;':r.r:: Lil -1 ,: : '-i::- -.-a:,s }:eral Dynmics.
stating the issue(s) required and enclosing a cheque forthe cover price of the issue{s).
MALTA AUSTRALIA
Obtain BINDEBS f rom
.: ::: AUS$2.25
yournewsagentor l::ai. BINDERS f rom
NEWZEALAND
STNGAPOSf, :ilCE: NZ$2.80
P?:: S -j5: Cbtain BINDERS trom
Co::-f\li:S-:- your newsagent or
iv'1F-;.---.--.= Gordon & Gotch (NZ)
6C' S -: l-,: :td. PO Box 1 595,
C3i r--2' Wel ington
ADDf, ESS FOR BINDERS AND BACK ISSUES NOTE AD DFESS FOR SUBSCRIPnONS
Orbis Publishing Limited Binders and back issues are obtainable subjeci to Orcis Publlshing Limited
Orbis House availability of stocks. Whilst every attempl ls made to Hurst Fam
2G22 Bedfordbury keep the price of the issues and binders constant, the Baydon Road
London publishers reserve the right to increase the stated Lambourne Woodlands
WC2N 4BT prices at any time when circumstances dictate. B nders Newbury
TC.phone: 01-379-521 I depicted in this publimtion are those produced forthe Berks
U K and Australian markets only. B inders and lssues RG1 67TW
may be subject to import duty and/or local taxes, which Telephone: 0488-72666
ChequevPostal Orders should be made payable to Orbis Publishing Limited. are not included in the above prices unless stated.
Binder prices include postage and packing and prices are in sterling. All cheques/Postal Orders should be made payable to Orbis
Publishing Limited. Postage and packaging is included in
Back lssues are sold at the cover price, and we do not charge carriage in theUK subscription rates, and prices are qiven in Sterling.
Naval
rface-fo-Air
l{issiles
Nowhere has the teclutological revolution affected warfare
more than at sea, Today's warshilx fight with radar,
computers and missiles to the extent that where frghting ships Silhouetted by the dawn, the twin Mk
26 launcher of the nuclear-powered
formerly bristled with light and heavy anti-aircraft guns, crurer US,S Mississippiis/oaded with
modern defences consist of a few solitary missile launchers, two Standard SM- I MR missiles.
During the period after World War II a vast array of research establish- in all the 'brush wars' fought around the
world it was not until the Vietnam
menis, special trrals ships, apparently unlimited money and groups of War that the naval SAM was first fired in anger, This war allowed the
rndustrial contractors were employed to solve the problem of furnishrng area-defence weapon (in the form of the Talos and Terrier) to be fired on
major surface combatants with a surface{o-air missile (SAM) defence a number of occasions against North Vietnamese MiG aucraft, scoring a
that was able to go to sea. total of seven known kills. The short-range systems did not get their
Although the iauncher and its missile were lrom an early stage seen to chance until the 1982 Falklands war, when dozens of Sea Dart, Sea Slug,
be the answer, rt required considerable resources just for the peripheral Sea Woif and Sea Cat missiles (as well as land-based Btowpipe and
equipment and redesigning of the shrps to carry the systems, For Rapier SAMs) were fired as part of a layered air defence nelwork
example, most of the first-generatron missiles literally had to have the against Argentine aircraft, Although recent evidence suggests that the
launch vessels stripped to the framework and rebuilt just to accommo- naval SAMs downed a combined total of only I I aircra.ft, this weapon
date the associated magazines, power supplies and electronic systems proved itself once and for ail to be more ellicient than the gnln in anti-au
below decks; then provision had to be made for the launchers and radar warfare defence.
equipment above decks, By the early I960s these beam-riding area-
defence missiles were overtaken by a second type specifically de-
A British Aerospace Sea Darf mrssjJe is Jauncfied. a Dart, an area defence
signed for shorVmedium-range defence of individual vessels, such ^Se
system, was used operationally for the first time in the 1982 South AUantic
systems being typified by the Tartar and Sea Cat systems, Surprisingly, conflict, shooting down at least five aircraft.
're
-.ruF
Naval Crotale
Derived from the ggound{aunched
Crotale system, the Naval Crotale
variant was designed as a self-defence
missile for use by ships against
medium-altitude, low-altrtude and sea-
skmmrng attacks by aircraft, helicop-
ters and missiles. It can also be used
agarnst surface targets in an emer-
gency. The standard Naval Crotale 85
version comprises a turret assembly
wrth two co-axial units (one with eight Naval Crotale uses lfte same b asic solid-fuelled Matra missile as the land-
readyto-fire missiles in theu contain- based version, having a Mach 2.5 performance and capable of tackling
er-launchers and the other supporting an fi'-slrjp mrssiles.
the fue-control radar and IR tracking
systems), a shelter housing the electro-
ruc data-processinq cablnets, and an
operator's console in the combat op-
eration centre for supervising the sys-
tem and sendinq the fire orders, A new
version, the Modular Naval Crotale, is
now available wlth either an eiqht-
mrssile Modular Naval Crotale (8IvLS)
or a four-missile Modular Naval Cro-
tale (4lvLS) launcher ftrrret for installa-
tion on shrps down to 500 tons displace-
ment. In all cases the target acqulsitlon
and trackrng is performed by the radar
of the Naval Crotale system itself after
it has been desigmated by the ship's
sensors. Missrle guidance is per-
formed by an improved line-of-sight
unit, For. sea-skimming targets both
the missile and target are tracked by a
drfferential IR technique, Once in the
vrcinity of the target the warhead is
detonated by an infoa-red proximity
fuse wlth a built-in time delay so that
the prefraemented splinters formed
by the detonation are concentated to
rmpact in the most vulnerable zone of
the target, A total of 18 reload rounds is
normally carried for the eighlround
Iaunchers. In the French navy the
basic Naval Crotale BS version is fitted
to the 'Georges Leygn:es' and 'Tourvil-
le' classes, whilst the Saudi Arabian
Naly has bought the Modular Naval
Crotale BMS system for the two lrigates
berng constructed ln France,
Specification Weights: total round 85 kg (tB7 1b); manoeuwinq targets, or 0.7-8,5 kn T he des troyer Georges Leygnres is
NavalCrotale warhead lS-ks (331b) HE- (0. 43-5, 28 mrles) agarst manoeuwtng seen tiedup alongside thewhartin
Type: point-defence missile foaqmentation targets, or 0,7-6.5 lcn (0.43-4,04 miles) Beirut. The eight-round Crotale
Dimensions:lenqth 2.Bg m (9 ft 5.8 in); Performance: maxmum speed Mach agarnst sea-shmming targetsi altihrde launcher and ils associatedradar
diameter 0, 15 m (5.9 in); span 0,53 m 2.3; range 0,7-13 kn (0,43-8,08 miles) limits 4-5000 m (13-16,405 ft) systems are prominent at the top of
(1ft8,7 in) agaifft hehcopters and non- thephotograph.
+
h
Masurca
Developed in the mid-1950s, the over, Dwinq flight the missile follows a
Masurca is a wholly French-designed trajectory which is determined bY
and French-buiit medium-range sold- proportional navigation as it keeps its
propellant area-defence naval SAM antenna pointed at the target illumin-
for task force and carrier escorts. Only ated by one of the two fire-control
three French shrps are equipped wrth radars. The Masurca system is cur-
the mrssile and its associated radar rently undergoing an upgnadtng prog-
systems, namely the missile friqates ramme to increase its reliability and to
Duquesne and Suflren and the crurser improve rts engagement envelope so
Coibert. Each vessel has a 3D sr.rweill- that it can be used well into the 1990s.
ance radar, a weapon-direction sys-
tem, two independent fire-control Specification
radars and a twin-rail launcher wrth a MasurcaMk2Mod3
48-round magTazine. T\ro types of gnri- Tlpe: medium-range area-defence
dance were developed for the deflni- missile
tive production vetsion, the Masurca Dimensions: Iengrthof missile 5.38 m
Mk 2 Mod 2, which used a command to (17 ft 7.8 in) and ofbooster 3,32 m (10 ft
line-of-sight beam-riding technique 10.7 in); diameterof missile0.406 m
and for the Masurca Mk 2 Mod 3 which
introduced a semt-active radar seeker
into servrce, Only the latter system re- Originally a relatively primitive
mains in service, the former having beam- riding comm an d gruidance
been phased out'in 1975, A solid- missile, theMasurcais now, as the
propellant booster unit is fitted, and in result of continuous development, a
under 5 seconds,'this accelerates the sophkticated SARH ( semi- active
missile to a speed of about Mach 3, at radar homing) missile with a range
which point the.rsustainer motor takes of 50 lan(31miles).
r262
Masurea (continued)
Naval Surface-to-Air Missiles
(I ft 3,98 in) and ofbooster 0,57 m (1 ft
10.44 in); spanof missile0,77m(2 ft
6.3 I in) and ofbooster 1,50 m (4 ft
11.05 in)
Weights: mrssrle 950 kg (2,094 Ib);
booster 1l4B kq (2,531 lb); warhead
100-kg (220-lb) HE-fragmentation
Performance: maximum speed Mach
3; range 50 km (3l miles); altitude Masurca is an area defence missile developed in association with Matra.
_e
ltmits 30-23000 m (1OO-75,460 ft) Currently beingupgraded, the systemwill sewe into the lgg}s.
fi ltiu"tro,
ffi
The Albatros Mk 2 medium-range sur- -dffi
face-to-air missile system uses the
Aspide multr-role mrssrle and can be
integrated with various types of ship- I
board fire-control systems. It can en- :::--:!*dil;=;*
gage anti-ship missiles of either the h.-.::.,.:'r,il'l!S
pop-up or diving type as well as the -' ,:,,1-:,i,:\€5
.,:i!Eg
normal range of manoeuwing arcraft
targets, The orignnal Albatros Mk I
system developed in I968-7i utilized
the RIM-7H5 missile of the NATO Sea
Sparrow project. Like the Sea Spar- Above: Albatros has been developed
row, the Aspide missile uses semi- by S elenia us inqAspide mrssiJes,
active radar homing, the trajectory to which also serve as air-to-air
the target being of the colllsion type weapons amongs t othe r role s.
wrth proportional navrgation. Target-
illumlnatton ls by a continuous-wave Dimensions:length3,70 m(I2 ft 1,7 in);
radar array whtch ts part of the ship's diameter 0,203 m (8 in); span 0.80 m
electronic outfit. The ]auncher can (2 ft 7.5 in) Weights: total round 204 kg
either be a standard eight-round cell (450 lb); warhead 33-ks (72,75-1b) HE-
v,nth associated reload magazine, or fragmentation
for ships down to 200 tons a four-round Performance: maximum speed Mach
cell which can be ieloaded rfrequrred 2.5+; range IB,S lcn (11,5 miles);
via standard shipboard replenishment altitude limits l5-5000 m (50- 16,405 ft)
at sea faciirties. Each inissile rs stored
in its own canister that also serves as
the launch tube, The missile is basical- Right: An Aspide missile is launched
ly the same as the au-launched version from theAlbatros system of a'Lupo'
but has cropped wings and flns, Since class frigate built in ltaly for the
it was developed, the Albatros missile Peruuian navy. Albatros has been
system has been adopted by 15 coun- adopted by I 5 navies to date,
tries througrhout the world (Argentina, inclu ding that of I taly.
cuador, Greece, Iraq, Italy, Japan,
Libya, Nigeria, Peru, Spain, Venezuela Below : An Aspide mrsr'/e rs /auncled
and four others). from the octuple launcher of an
Italian 'Maestrale' class frigate. The
Specification Albatros system is replacing the
Aspide /VATO Sea Spa rrow system in the
Type: point-defence missile vessels of the ltalian navy.
Close -in ltlleapon Suslems
The biggest threatin modern naval wartare comes from the
high,speed, sea-skimming missile, and much effort has been
made tofind an effective last-ditch counter.ln most cases, the
solutionhasbeen agun systemwith ahigh rate of fire.
Fleet air defeqce.is. based on the attrition of attacking aircraft and missiles by
defence'in depth, initiaily by combat air patrols (working in conjunction w-ith
airborhe early warning airbrait) along the axes of hrghest threai and then nV SQQ"
coveiage wiih missiE systems of [rogressrvely shorter range However, with
the adrlent of modern cii.lise missiles that have sea-skimming and underwater-
launch capabilities, there was need for new lightweignt deJence systems. to
work effebtivelv as 'last-ditch' weapons in the engagen- ent of attacKers leaking
through the quter defence zones oi popping up f rbm crl:se missile submarines
at rei;tively short range. These weafons w6re req I red to deslroy the incoming
missiles fdr enough 6ut to prevent them f rorn maLi,ta rling a bailistic trajectoty
jnOiriii'ing into ihe defenbing ship. The systerns v,:ie al-sc required 10 have a
very h igh iniividual+ound kill piobability, an e xtre.r e t =asi reactlon tim e, a high
rat6 o*ire and.an extremely good first-time h t cap:b lilv.
To meet this the US NavyEesigned and built tne 2f-rir Phalanx close-in
!/eapon system (CIWS) with a six-barrel A/6141 G.:r 19' grn and.a v^ery
ef'edtive d'epleted uranium projectile. Tne Roval \a l=::ij Jool the Sea
Wolf automatic missile systern to'ollow on fron-. i' e 3':. : -s :ei Cat mlssrle
Unfortunately the Falklands war showed a neeC :l' :::1 ilpes ef system
(especiallyagainstsea-skimmingmissiles),sotheRc'.': rasa-doptedthe
"..':--r.r Goalkeeper
Philanx a's a-n interim CIWS for-her carriers and the J-::-
CIWS for certain new,build ships. Existing shrps' clc==-'=' j? letences are
being upgraded. by the installation of more basic gu n s!' s:.'- s ari ine carriage of
the new Javelin portable air-defence missile.
The US Navy id planning to supplement the Pna 1'' :'
:.:-2 7 ships with.th6
: g-L;dance against
Rolling Airframe Missile t6at uses passive radar r:-- j 3- :
activdradarhoming cruise missjles.
TheSovietnavy,6sthechief operatorof theanl:-si 3:-- s: "'rssrle'hadin.the
nreantime analys'ed the defencd against such weac:-: ::"ecily, and had thus
gone for a missile/gun mix from thb star{. The SA-\-: 3::':: ''vas used as the
;rio rrv"roiir1;:i;feil;:n;i*ort, wittr ripioirr: -6--^ 3-,nl and 100-mm
t3 9-in) guns as back-up before the missiles c.-:.'..:^:-e f:aal close-ra1ge Goalkeeper is a Dutch-designed systen with a 30-mm Gatling type canion
area cov'bred by the 30lmm ADG6-30'Gatling' o,r. -' : - - - r, 13st Soviel su{qqe manufactured by General Electric in the USA, with electronics by Hollandse
snipswere eqripped with combinations of thiest s '.':--. '-;rihe.early 1970s
onwards. The Soviets are nowactively engaged . 3' -J ' I = second-generatron
S ig[aal app ar aten. T he sy s tem ias been ciose n by th e R oy al N avy for new -
burJd vessels.
retwork into Service, this being based on a ve{,ca:- .-- .. r t defence missile
"
*iirliipaujritvbgainiicruGr;ijiiles,tnesA-N'E z-..-:;'a:tedversionsofthe
ADG6-30; possibly with depleted uranium amr -- : '- :- ;'t equivalent.
Other European nations have gone for a less s::- :: :::eC mix of guns and
nrlssiles. ltaly designed and has
-exporred
tne ;€-'- :- ^ OTO-Melara Com-
-
oact gun andthe 4d-mm Dardo close-range ie':-::3. ::3:.', tcgether with the
Albatios lightweight short/medium-range n' ss = s ,.-< -:-. *lthough consider-
ably less eipensiv:e than the systems o:1ne ,a,e." ' . '. j.
3: ," ers, the capabilitles
of these syitems appear to b6 of tlre san e c,ie' 3 -1: - lhey have yet to be
combat teAted.'On;rcountry that has consriera::: :r:;':r'ce cf naval missile
warfare, lsrael, has gone ltsbwn way anci is f'ti:1g 3:':< :::ri-defence missiles
anC eitH'eiJiobaily lesigned 30-mm grn svstei c: z ="..nx. mount to lsraeli
','essels.
For the future there are alreadY rumours of a Sc'' e : ,:s:' arir-misslle defence
system for major cabital ships, to be f leldeci rn ine iei: 13E!s SofartheUSNavY
aas remained quiet about thls, although lt is probabl',' r::'a. behind with such a
SVStCM.
Sea Dafi
The Sea Dart (or Guided Weapon Sys-
tem Mk 30 to give it its Royal Navytitle)
was designed by Britsh Aerospace un
the I960s as a third-generation area-
defence naval SAM capable ofengag-
ing targets such as aircraft and missiles
at both very high and, under certain
circumstances, very lowaltihrdes. The
system was used operationally during
the 1982 Falklands war, beingoficially
credited with eight kiils. However, re- shot down outside the missile's official missiles), the sole Type 82 class des- Sea Darf ri an a rea defence missile,
cent evidence suggests that the num- engagement envelope at very low koyer built. Sea Dart can also be used powered by a Rolls-Royce Odin
ber was ach-rally five: an A6rospatiale level. The launcher is a twin-rail unit out to 25-30 km (15,5-18,6 miles) ramjetwith rocket booster for
Puma helicopter, a Learjet 35A recon- and is coupled with two Type 909 agarnst swface targets f reguired. The launch. The missile depicfedfias a
naissance aircraft, a BAe Canberra target tracking and illuminator radars system was also sold to Argentu:ra for cover over the ramjetintake.
B.Mk 62 light bomber and two McDon- on the Type 42 (20 missiles) des- its tvvo Type 42 destroyeri, and thjs
nell Douglas A-4C Skyhawk Iight troyers,'Invincible' class aircraft car- probably explarrs the relatlve lack of
attack aircraft. The last aircralt was riers (20 missiles), and HMSBnsto/ (40 kills by the system during the war as
1265
SeaDart (continued)
the enemy already knew its perform- 1980s and early I990s. A Lightweight
ance capabilities. Guidance is of the Sea Dart system has also been de-
semi-active homing type with associ- veloped for ships down to 300 tors dis-
ated proportional navigation. A ramjet placement: this uses deck-mounted
engine powers the missile in fliqht af- container-launchers with simpllfled
ter a sohd-propellant booster unit has radars and fire-control units. The Peo-
brought it up to the veloctty required ple's Republic of China Planned to
for the main engine to take over. Unfcr- purchase this system as part ofa mod-
tunately, in the 19Bl defence cuts a ification package for its 'l,uda' class
corsiderably improved Sea Dart Mk 2 destroyers, but the dealwas cancelled
was cancelled: this was a version to because of funding problems.
combat the Soviet cruise missiles de-
sigined to go into a terminal dive ftom
high aititude, and this politico- Specification
economrc cut has Ieft a serioris gap in SeaDart
fleet defences for the period ofthe late Type: medrum-range area-defence
missile
In addition to arming the U K's TYpe Dimensions: lengrth 4.36 m (14 ft
82 and TYpe 42 destroyers, Sea D art 3. 65 in); diameter 0.42 m
is mounted on the three'lnvincible' ( I ft 4.54 in); span 0.9 I m (2 ft 1 LB3 in)
class airctaft-carr'ers. Ifis also used WeighG: total round 550 kg (1,213 Ib);
by Argentina on thef TYpe 42 warhead HE-fr agrmentation
des troyers. A lightweight system has Performance: maximum sPeed Mach
beendeveloped to arm vessels down 3*;range 65 }<rn (40.4miles); altihrde
toonly 300 tons. lunits 30- 18290 m (100-60 000 ft)
I Ztltl
a
SAlls in Adion tn fhe Falklands
l:r all the widespread adoption of surface-to-air missiles in thenavies of theworld,
::e only occasions where they have seen operational service have been inVietnam
',,,'nere US long-rangremrssilesscored against enemy aircraft), and theFalklands,
','.':tere for the first time a missile-armed fleet came up against determined large-
:cale attack.
'-?82
. .,= Falklands war was the flrst real test of the ship wide open. In what can only be de-
. '-: jern surface fleet's layered defence con- scribed as a miraculous escape the bombs
--:: uslng aircraft in the outermost defence meant for lhe Brilliant fell short, one then
--:: and medium-range SAMs in the middle bouncing over the top of the ship's superstruc-
: -:,: before hostile aircraft can reach the final ture,
,-::e-range inner zone, defended by short- In the meantime Ihe Glasgow, unable to en-
:---;e shrpborne missiles, medium- and iight- gage with her Sea Dart system, survived a
- =--bre anti-aircraft guns and small arms, direct hit from a 454-kq (1000-ib) bomb that
,:e f,rst combat use of SAMs durrng Opera- passed straight through her hull from one side
.-,- Corporate'was on 9 May 1982, when the to the other before explodino in the sea
--;'::e 42 destroyer HMS Coventry and the Type beyond several seconds later, However, the
-: rrgate HMS Broadsword were operating off
:::: Stanley. The Tlpe 965 air search radar of
damage proved severe enough for the Glas-
gow to have to withdraw from the operational
':.= Ccventry picked up a siow-movrng hostile zone. As a result of this attack, Admiral Wood-
-,:iorne target near the town and engaged it
'.''-.h a Sea Dart missile, This exploded close to
::. F,rgentine army Aerospatrale SA 330 Puma
:.:-rcopter, causing it to crash with the loss of all
:bcard, Three days later, on 12 May, came the
-rn of the destroyer HMS GJasgouz and the
:- ate HMS Bnlliant, sister ships of the pre- €Yry!ry":a
.--ius vessels, Two four-plane fligrhts of McDon-
:-e1l Douglas A-4B Skyhawks from the Argen- :r,::=:::ffi
.-ne air force's Grupo 5 swooped in to attack the
srips just after midday as they took part in a
:ombardment of Port Stanley airfleld, The
-eading wave was engaged by the BnTlant's
Sea Wolf systems, which sent two aircraft cart-
-i heeling out of the sky in flames and forced a
:hird to crash as rt tried to evade a mrssrle, As
:he surviving Skyhawk pulled away the second
:Ight attacked, three aircraft heading for the
G)asgow and one for the Bnlljant. Again the Below: The only ships fitted with,Seas/ugs jn the
Above: The first problem taced by the Britishwas
Sea Wolf system prepared to engage, but as that any assault on the Falklandswould have to South Atlantic were the'County' cJass deslroyers
:he missiles were about to be launched the cope with the substantial threat posed by the HMS Antrim and Glamorgan. A first-generation,
nre-control computer suddenly switched off skilful pilots of the Argentine armed forces, flying beam-riding weapon,,Seaslugsaw its first ( a nd.
ihe automatic enqagement sequence, leaving A-4Skyhawks or (as here) theDassaultMirage. probably its last) action in the campaign.
::i
itlii.Ert,|+
=ri:i;.i.+rl
!FrF*
F{ a --
-
SAI\4s in Action in the Falklands
1268
SAMs in Action in the Falklands
v.
-{E-
f sn-r.r-l 'Goa'and SA-N-7
The firstSoviet navy SAM to see wide service, the SA-N- I 'Goa'is thought to
have beendevelopedfrom the land-based system of the same name.
Below: A 'Kashin' class destroyer Above : Visible behind the twin I 30- Above: The twin-rail SA-N- I launcher
launches an SA-N-I Goa. The mm gan mounton the Soviet aboard a 'l(asftin'c/ass destroyer is
engagement envelope ofthe Mach desfroyer Sowemenny, the single- roll-stahilized to give stable launch
2.1 mksile is between 6 and 22 km rail fiauncher for the SA-N-7 is conditions in rough sea states.There
G.7 - I 3.7 miles) at heights ranging thought to be capable of rapid areover 60 systems inuse on'SAM
from90 to 15250 m (295-50,030 ft). reloading and firing. The presence oI Kotlin','Kanin','Kynda','Kashin' and
The 60-kg ( 1 32 Jb) warhead can be six separatefire control radars 'Kresta l' class vessels, the last two
high explosive or low-yield nuclear. implies a multiple target system. c/asses fi avrhg two twin launchers.
Specification
SA-N-l'Goa
Type: medium-range area-defence
nissrle
Dimensions: length 6,70 m (21 ft
- 1 8 in); diameter of mtssrle 0,46 m (1 ft
t i rn)andofbooster0,T0I m(2 ft
3 6 in); span of missile 1,50 m (4 ft
i i.l rn)
Weights: total round 946 kg (2,085,5 lb)
icr SA-N- 1a and 950 ks (2,094.4 lb) for
SA-N- Ib; warhead 60-kg (132-lb) HE
or l0-krlotonnuclear
Performance: maximum speed Mach
Z I,range6-22 km (3,7-13,7miles);
altrtude limits 90- 15250 m (295-
50,030 ft)
\272
SA-N-3 'Goblet' and SA-N-6 (continued) Naval Surface-to-fur Ms s r.1 e s
.r':lcher, the system rotatlng to the
.':rlrcal for reloadinq from an under-
:eck magazine. The proportion of mis-
::es fltted with nuclear warheads in
-:e ship's outfit has been assessed by
*-me sources as 25 per cent, Guidance
'. by radio command via 'Head Light'
::ries fire-control radar array. The
3oblet' is fitted to 'Kresta Ii' and'Kara'
:lass mrssrle cruisers as well as to the
lloskva' and 'Kiev' classes of avration
s :]lps,
I
In 1978 the replacement system, the
SA-N-6, entered sewice on the 'Kirov
:-uclear-powered cruiser class as part
:i what is now known to be a Soviet
AEGIS-style SAM area-defence sys-
:em for surface task groups, The sing-
je-stage missile is vertically launched
:om silos served by eiqht-round rot-
ary magazines, and is an advanced
lgh-performance SAM adapted from
:he Soviet army's SA-i0 speciflcally to
provide the navy with a missile that has
extensive anti-cruise missile capabilt-
ies, Missile guidance is semt-active
:or the mid-course phase (with target Specification Above: The large twin-rail launcher
:llumination from the 'Top Dome' SA-N-3'Goblet' aboard 'Kresta II' class cruisers may
radar) and then active radar for the Tlpe: medium-range area-defence be a dualpurpose system, capable o!
terminal phase to gTive a much more missile firing SS -N - 1 4 anti- submarine
accurate rnterception, The system has Dimensions: length 6.40 m (21 ft 0 in); missiles aswell as theSA-N-3.The
srnce entered service on the 'Krasina' diameter 0,70 m (2 ft 3,6 in); span sysfem isa/sofitted to the'Riev',
class missile cruisers, which have a 1,70m(5ft6.9in) 'K ara' and'Moskva' c/asses.
slmmed-down version of the missile Weights:total round not known;
firted to the Kirov. The 7.0 m (22f1 warhead 150-kq (331-lb) HE or 25- Right: The hatch covers over the
1l..6in) long solid-propellant Mach 6 kiloton nuclear vertical launch system aboard the
mrssile has a 100 kg (220 lb) conven- Performance: maximum speed Mach Sovief cruiser Slava conceal eight-
.ronal HE warhead and can engage 2,8; range 6-30 lcn (3,7-lB,6 mrles) in round rotary magazines tor the SA-N-
iargets between 10 m (33 ft) and early versions or 6-55 km (3.7-34 miles) 6missrJes carrie d. The SA-N-G has
30500 m (100,065 ft) at ranges between in later versions; altitude limits 90- also been fitted to the 'Kirov' class
1.6 and 64 km 16 and 40 miles) 24500 m (295-80,380 ft) crusels as an a nti-missile system.
USA
srano.ara
-
The semi-actrve radar homlnq conven-
ional warhead Standard family of nav-
al SAMs started deveiopment in the
early 1960s as the replacement for the
Temer and Tartar systerns, The lat-
:er's repldcement was the Standard
SM-IMR (RIM-66A), and was designed
inth an enqagement range of 46,35 kn quldance which extends the range of Latest in a line of missiles stretching back to the late I 940s, the Standard
.28.8 miles) and an altitude of 45- the Tartar-sized missile by 60 per cent missile, in its SM-Z form, is used in the advanced AEGIS system.
'-3240 to around 74 l<rn (46 miles). A corres-
m (150-50,000 f0, The Terrler's
replacement, designated Standard ponding Standard SM-ZER varrant or
SM-IER (RIM-67A) had a range of RIM-678 is not desigmed to be fired by
14 kn (46 miles) and altitude limits of AEGlS-equipped ships, although im-
+5-24385 m (i50-80,000 ft), After enter- provements in its booster technoloqy
rg service from 1968 onwards in ships adds,a complete Mach number to its
-:ndergoing refits and on new-build velocity to give a kinetic range far out-
-r'arshrps, both missiles have under- side the current limits of an AEGIS
;cne several reliability improvement type ire-control system. However, the
performance update program- improvements considerably enhance
=d
::es. A new dual-thrust motor for the the weapons' capabrlities against high-
S:andard SM-lMR produced the RIM- performance alrcraft and missiles,
668 missile with a 45 per cent increase Those ships equipped with Terriers
'- maximum range and a 25 per cent and its Standard SM-IER replacement
:crease in the upper altitude engaete- have suitable fire-control systems and
*ent limrt. In most cases the changes are gettinq the Standard SM-2ER,
-'"t have been made have been in- A low-yield nuclear fission warhead,
::rporated as production 'Block' the WB I, is under development for de-
::-anqes which have not gnven rise to ployment with some 500 or so Standard
new designations. The most re- SM-2MR and SM-2ER missiles from the
=-r
:--tt version of the SM- ]MR, however, mid- l980s onwards to replace the Ter-
-.. been gdven the designation RIM- rier RIM-ZD(N), Desigmated Standard
i6C or Standard SM-2MR as it is the SM-2(N) the missile will become part Standard SM-2MR missijes are almost doubles the range of the first
* srle desigmed to operate with the carried aboard the widedmissile model, and the gireatly upratd
ijGIS air-defence system, The AEGiS frjals sfijps USS Norton Sound. fle e I ec t r o ni cs of the !ruidan ce sys tem
:-;em allows for mid-course missile ContinuedonpageLZTE SM-2 version of the Standard missile ens ures improved performance.
us sAt.l
S urface-to-airm.r'ssi/e development by
the US Navy.has seen a considerable
advance in accuracy and capability '
sinceWorldWar II. The missile defence
of today, notably the highly sophisticated
AEGIS system, is apotent force.
II
I
The Talos long-range area-defence SAM was
theprincipal goalof the WorldWar Ilprogram-
me known as 'Bumblebee'. Because of the
Americans' lack of ramjet propulsion experi-
ence, the missile in its ultimate form was
approached in stages. T\llo of the test vehicles
produced were the Experimental Prototype
Missile (XPM and the Supersonic Test Vehicle
(STV). The icrmer was developed into the
Talos proper whilst the latter evolved rnto the
Terrier missile. As buiit, the Talos was a beam-
rider over most of ils range, flying along a
radar beam designed to gmide the missile
along an energy-efficient trajectory until it
along it 0 (RIM-ZA) BW-t (RIM-ZB), BT-3 (RIM-2C), Twin Talos missiles are seen aboard the World
nearedthe_target,whereasemi-activehoming and BT-3A (RIM-2D) were the beam-riding War II 'Cleveland' class cruiser, converted to
seeker took over. This resulted in the missile variants while the HT-3 (RIM-2E and RIM-2F) grur:ded missi/e configruration. Talos was used
often impacting the target from above, a factor was the semi-active homing variant. A nuclear- operationally during theVietnam War, scoring at
which produced several tactical surprise situa- armed version of the BT-3A, Isror,vn as the BT- ranges of over I 20 km (75 miles).
tions in Vietnam, where MiG piiots were taught 3(N) or RIM-ZD(N), was also built with the I-
that SAMs always arrived from below. kiloton W45 warhead to complement the con- ment for target illumination by dedicated radar
Throughout its service lifetlme, from 1957 to ventional HE-fragmentation versions. from launch to interceptlon, a new missiie
1979, Talos was continually updated: the last The third missile of what became known as known as the Typhon was ordered into de-
version, the RIM-8J, had a range of 249 kn (i50 the 3T-Program was the Tartar, which was en- velopment in both medium- and long-range
miles), which was a considerable improve- visaged as a shorter-range equivalent of the forms, The missile was to use new aerodyna-
ment over that of the earlier models. The final Terrier to arm destroyer-sized vessels princi- mic and electronic technology to overcome the
Unlfied Talos versions cguld lse either a 5- pally against low-flyihgr attackers, Deiigneld saturation threat, but it was cancelled as the
kiloton W30 nuclear or a 210 9-kg (465-1b) HE- from the outset as a semr-active radar hoiring necessary technologry ultimately proved to be
fragmentation warhead.. Dwing Vietnam de- system, the missiie soon underwent a produc"t beyond the capabilities of the industries in-
ployments the cruiser USS/,ongBeach scored improvement programme that resulted in the volved at the time, However, many of the ideas
two MiG kilis at extreme range over North Improved Tariar (RIM-Z4B) with a consider- and concepts devised for the system surfaced
Vtetnam in 1968, whiist dwing the mining of ably enhanced performance envelope. Com- later in the AEGIS programme. Before this lat-
Haiphong harbour in
Hatphong in April 1972 the cruiser USS pared with those of the tvvo other systems, the ter system mahrred, however, replacements
?rcago added a thud
Chicago kill.
third krll Tartar's development was rapid,
rapid,-and
and large
larqe for the Terrier and Tartar were still needed,
As already i4dicated, the Terrier was de- numbers of the family were procured for boith and this resulted in the development of the
veloped from the Talos technotogry but actually the US Navy and friendly Western nations. Standard missile famiiy. The Standard SM-IMR
preceded it into service by a year or so. The was evolved to replace the Tartar and the Stan-
programme su-ffered from continual Depart- Newtechnology dard SM-IER to replace the Terrier. Using
ment of Defense pressure, and for this reason In the late lg50s the major percelved threat cofilmon components, the Standard SM-IMR
su-ffered badly from reliabllity problems in its that the Soviets could field was a saturation was ultimately developed into the Standard
early stages, Its evolution was thereiore gra- attack by aircraft and missiles, in which the SM-2MR for use with the muttiple{arget antr-
dual, one major element of the gmidance sys- fleet's missile defences wor'rld have to cope saturation AEGIS system. This uses the inbullt
tem, means of flight control or propulsion motor with a large number of targets simultaneousiy, faciiity of the AEGIS system fire-control com-
being varied at a time. Most significant As the existing missiles such as Tatos and Tei- puters to command any missile's autopiiot sys-
changes resulted in new versions, and the BW- rier were tactically limited by their require- tem in flight to provide continuous cowse up-
dates so that the missile can fly a highly efficient
trajectory to the vicinity of the target, where the
semi-active homing seeker takes over, The
more energy-efficient flight trajectory con-
siderably increases the range of the SM-2MR,
to the point where it matches that of the earlier
SM-IER missile. At the same time as the AEGIS
system was being developed an improvement
programme for the SM-IER was underway.
This resulted in the SM-2ER missile, whlch en-
tered operational sewice in 1980 with a higher
velocity and improved engagement envelope
to enable it to defeat high-performance targets,
Interestingly, the SM-ZER cannot be used with
the AEGIS system as its performance is outside
that system's capabiiities. A nuclear-armed
version of both the SM-2MR and SM-2ER is
under deveiopment to allow the missiles to
engage nuclear-armed cruise missiles at long
range.
A standard MRmrssi,le ri,launcfi ed from USS
Ticonderog4 the firs t of the AEGI S cruis ers. AE G I S
is a complete air defence system, with advanced
detection and controlequipment deslimed to
handle saturation air and missile attacks on the
carrier battle group.
Naval Surfa c e-to- Air lvllissil[es
€ HL" sp"rrow
In the early 1960s the Sparrow proved
to be the best missile to lorm the basis
of the Basic Point Defense Missile Sys-
tem (BPDMS) for the US Navy, The first
mrssile used, the RIM-7ES, of what has
now become a family of Sea Sparrow
missiles, was derived from the AIM-?E
Sparrow air-to-air missile, This was
then reconfigured into the RIM-?H
round and then the RIM-?F was used,
based on the much improved AIM-7F, Based on the AIM-7 Sparrow Iamily of air-to-air missiles, the RIM-7 Sea
The semr-active radar-homing Sea Sparrow provides basic point defence for the US and NATO navies.
Sparrow's performance was quite im-
pressive as its engagement ranqe was
between 14,9 and 22.3lgl (9.25 and
13,8G miles) depending upon the
target's altitude, wluch could lie be-
tween 30 and 15240 m (I00 and 50,000
ft). All versiors were, however, consi-
dered deflcient against low-flying
cruise missiles which had by then be-
come a major threat to US naval forces,
In order to rectify this defect, low-
altitude radar gmidance and fuslngt
capabilities were to be given to Block I
RIM-7F missiles to enable them to hrt
targets below 15 m (50 ft), whilst Block
IImissiles were to get enhanced
ECCM features. However, both fxes
were dropped from the procEamme as
the RIM-7P was superseded on the
Continuedonpage 1280
The only missile defence cawied by
USNavy attack carriers is the Basic
Point Defence Missile System, using
Sea Sparrow missiles. The system
has been in operation for some time,
as this picture of U.SSJohn F. Kennedy
taken in the Mediterranean in I 969
demonstrates.
1 410
latmch Sgsfems
Cne of the most dramatic sights inmodern militaryweaponry
:.sthe launch of anaval missilefrom awarship atsea.The
.nissr/e jsno t thewhole story, however: without thelauncher,
r eloading systems and magazines there would be no defence
at all against determined onslaughtfrom an enemyattacking
:n numbers.
-he launch rate and reliabiiity of its launcher system have an important impact on
.re effic,ency o'rhe surface-to-air -issile system as a whole. Throughout the
leveloprnent of naval SAMs the weapons have continually integrated new and
mproved design features that were aCopted to permit faster and more efficient
aunching, First-generatron systems such as the Sea Slug Mk 1, the Terr;er and
tne earlier Talos variants were far less reliable than the anillery systems that
they were designed to replace, so much so that check-out and even overhaui
J1d asserrbly'acilit.es were required as part of the rFiss:le sLowage and loading
system together with (until quite recentiy) the means of jettisoning and replac-
:ng duci rounds already on the launcher. Surprisingly, this last feature had a
considerable effect on the physical design of the launcher itself. The missiles
ihemselves were mostly stowed in horizontal magazines in the first generation
of purpose-built and converted missile ships, and were fired from twin-arm
launchers.
Dui'nq the '1 95Os thc concept of verticar stowage gained ground as it posses-
sed the advantages of handling the missiles in attitudes much more suitable for
tne reduction of'damage fronishock, vrbration cr ship motion together with a
reduction in the amount of handling equipment needed. The boosters and
missiles could thus be mated in th6 magbzine space and then placed on a The GMLS Mk 26r's flre /asfesf a nd mostversatile launcher in IJS Navy service
ready-use ring below the Iauncher. However, because of its sheer size the Talos today. Fully automatic, the Mk 26 can handle Standard SAMs, Harpoon SSMs
nad 1o remain a norrzontal stowage system. aadA^SROCASW missiles, from magazines of 24,44 or 64 roundcapacity. tt
The advent of the U S Navy;s Tariar f6r missile destroyers brought into service egulps the Ji?sf A-EGJS crulsers . but will be superseded by vertical launch
a highly automated vertical stovrage system wrth both M k 1 1 double- and M k 1 3 syslems.
and Mk 22 single-rail launchers
Tne ldtter ry[e was deviseC to acn.eve a higher rel abil,ty than tle tw n-a'-
iauncher whilst maintaining the same overall rate o{ fire. However, the adopt on
of the Tartar did have disadvantages the missiles became more difficult to
ser,-ice (which ultimaieiy preclude-d the use of a nuclear warhead fcr obvious
safety reasons) and there was a lack of flexibility in accommodating other
missile types ({or instance, the rnodern 'Ollver Haza rd Perry' class frigates with a
Mk 13 launcher can carry only SAMs and the equivalent-sized Harpoon anti-ship
missile but not the ASF'OC intr-submanne mrssile). The latter was one of thb
main reasons why 11-," Mk 13 launcher was reiected for the AEGIS system,
leading to the development of the new Mk 26 launcher. Th s has an even fastei
rate of fire and the ability to handle most type of missiies. This conventionaltwin
raillauncherinturnistobesupersededbytheMk4lvertical-iaunchsystemwith
individual compartments that can handle missiles up to and incluoing the size of
Tomahawk crurse missiles. The rate of {ire is decreased to one round per
second, though the capability of muitrple-shot engagements is ava!lable far
more readily than before.
The Royal Navy went to an automatic twin+arl launch system for the Sea Dart
area-defence missile but stayed with hand loading for rts new Sea Wolf point
defence system, which has somewhat degraded lhe ability to cope with satura-
lion atracks.
The Soviets rnore or less ioilowed the US Navy in this paltern of development,
but sprang the surprise of the f irst operatronal vbrtical-LAunch SAM launihers in
the late 1970s with the SA-N-6 system; this uses rotary magazines to reload the
individual launcher bins. A second rnrssile system, of the point-defence type, is
now entering service with the same rotary-reload launcher arrangements.
r&
In between theMks IA and 26 twin-rail launchers, FMC praduced lfies.lhgje- Th e G M LS Mk I0I aunche r is fit ted to U S N avy cru.fsers and Jarger de s troyer s
rail Mk i 3 svstem. Fif ted to mr'ssrle deslroyers as well ai ta the two nucleir as well as to c r uis er s of the I talian navy. C a p ahle of fir ing S tand ard or Terrier
cruisers Califomiaand South Carolina and to fft e'Oliver Hazard Perry' class rnissi/es, the Mk I 0 in its later models can also handle ASROC . The size of the
fngares, the Mk I 3 can handle Terrier,standard and H arpoon missiies. syslem rsindica ted by the number of maintenancecrew.
Sea Sparrow (continued)
ffi irevr
Interest in a short-range lightureight
missile to complement the Phalanx
close-in weapon system remained
strong even after the Phalarx prog-
ramme began in 1969, After consider- The RAM, or Rolling Airframe Missile, employs components from both the
able congnessronal pressure on the US SidewinderAAIUI and theStinger portableSAM, added to apassive radar seeker.
Navy, the West German and Danlsh
qovernments stepped il
to save the
programme from termination by sign-
ing memoranda of understanding to
develop what by then was desigmated
the RIM- I 16A or Rolling Airframe Mis-
sile, usually shortened as RAM, to arm
both frigates and smail combatants.
The missile's unusual narne is derived
from the fact that it is spinning as it
emerqes from the launcher, after
which fins are extended, Guidance is
entirely passive, and initially uses a
tvvo-antenna broad-band radar seeker
to point the terminal homing IR seeker
head at the target. When this picks up
the 'glint' ofthe target, the radar seeker
is turned offas the IR gmidance s consi-
dered much more accwate. The ship's
flre-controi system informs the mrs-
sile's radar inferometer system of the
frequency of the incoming target's ac-
tive seeker head, The RAM employs
the motor, fuse system and warhead of
the Sidewinder air{o-air missile, the This is the first test Launch of RAM over water , with only the nose of the missile out of the launch box but with the front
IR seeker of the Strnger surface-to-arr fins already deploying.
missile, and the passive radar system
described, The launcher will erther be
a newly developed 24{ube system on
a Phalanx gun mount (for the two
NATO navies) or a five-round unit in-
serted into each of two upper cells of
an octuple Sea SparrodASROC laun-
cher on US Navy warships, Operation-
al deployment of the system has been
delayed until the mid-1980s although
the trials have been successful,
Specification
RIM-I16ARAM
Type: poinldefence missile
Dimensions:lengrth 2.794 m (9 ft 2 in);
drameter 0,127 m (5 in); span0,438 m
(1 ft 5.25 in)
Weights: totalround 72, I kg (159 1b);
warhead 10. 2-kg (22. 4-1b); HE-
fragmentation
Performance: maxrmum speed Mach Wellonitsway, theRAM missile accelerates towards its maximumvelocity of Mach 2.The systemisdesigned fo
2+; range 9.4 kn (5.85 miles); altitude complementthe Phalanx 20-mmguninproviding comprehensive close-inanti-mrssj,le defence.
limrts lowto medium
1280