Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ISSN: 2456-9992
Abstract: Management accounting measures analyzes, and reports financial and nonfinancial information that helps managers make
decisions to fulfill the goals of an organization. Managers use management accounting information to develop, communicate, and
implement strategy. They also use management accounting information to coordinate product design, production, and marketing decisions
and to evaluate performance. The purpose of this article is to analyze the management accounting systems tools practices in Nepalese
Commercial Banks. It was found that the perceptions of top management representative of commercial banks in Nepal perceived
management accounting system tools as significant in their banking system and have also used these tools to increase their performance.
Keywords: Management Accounting, Budgetary control, cash flow statement, balance score card.
developing country like Nepal has greatly suffered from management representatives with an expected rate of return
limited resources endowments, particularly the capital, of 100% on account of their vital role in banking
technical know-how, poor manpower, improper planning, management accounting system decisions. Out of the
ineffective information and controlling system, ineffective distributed 50 questionnaire, all questionnaires were returned
implementation of policies, political instability etc. [12]. In after minimum follow ups.
view of the situation outlined above a number of issues
emerge. The following are the key research issues towards 3.1. Reliability of Top level management representatives’
which this study has been directed. Questionnaire
What is the extent of the use of management accounting The Cronbach„s α for Top level management representatives‟
system in Nepalese Commercial Banks? Questionnaire on Management Accounting Techniques was
What are the roles of management accounting in 0.865 (highly reliable) for application part and 0.917 for
Nepalese Commercial Banks‟ management? significance part.
(16%), Rastriya Banijya Bank 9 nos. (18%) and Standard Table 3 :Descriptive statistics of ranking of significance
Chartered Bank 8 nos. (16%). Similarly, the management management accounting system tools
representatives have varying working experience. Out of the
total respondents, 23 nos. (38%) were 6-11 years of Test Value = 2
experience, 19 nos. (38%) of 12-18 years, 7 nos. (14%) of 19 Sig.
Tools Mean SD
t df (2-
years and 1 no. (2%) of 1-5 years. Out of the total tailed)
management representatives, 49 nos. (98%) were the top Budgetary control 2.80 .495 11.431 49 .001
level officers and only 1 no. (2%) was CEO of the banks. Ratio Analysis 2.80 .452 12.522 49 .001
Cash flow statement
2.74 .527 9.925 49 .001
analysis
4.2. Management accounting system in Nepalese
CVP Analysis 2.60 .639 6.641 49 .001
commercial banks SWOT Analysis 2.46 .613 5.305 49 .001
This part of study has an outlook on the perception of top Variance analysis 2.42 .673 4.414 49 .001
management of commercial banks towards how they Competitors Analysis 2.40 .670 4.221 49 .001
perceive the importance of Management Accounting System Inter firm
2.34 .688 3.492 49 .001
Tools in their banking system. So, in this section it is comparison
Total Quality
attempted to explore the significance regarding Management Management
2.30 .678 3.130 49 .003
Accounting System Tools in Commercial Banks. These Process
2.30 .763 2.782 49 .008
management representative perceive the importance of the Reengineering
management accounting system tools in their respective Responsibility
2.12 .689 1.231 49 .224
accounting
banks. The exploration is based on the twenty-three (23)
Kaizen costing 2.10 .707 1.000 49 .322
preset management accounting system tools. It is ranked in Standard costing 1.94 .682 -.622 49 .537
their mean score. The determination of the tools that majorly Activity based
1.86 .639 -1.549 49 .128
perceived important by the management representative has costing
considered on the Mean factor which would be statistically Segment Reporting 1.86 .783 -1.265 49 .212
Target costing 1.84 .710 -1.593 49 .118
significant at Mean Test Value=2, 95% C.I, that means the
Opportunity costing 1.82 .629 -2.024 49 .058
management accounting system tools are significant Attribute costing 1.74 .664 -2.768 49 .068
signified the perception and have a greater impact at their Just in Time(JIT) 1.64 .598 -4.257 49 .501
management accounting system. Similarly, recalling the Life cycle costing 1.62 .667 -4.030 49 .541
ranking was done with the highest to lowest scores in a Balance score card 1.60 .606 -4.667 49 .674
distribution. The reliability analysis was done for the present Variable &absorption
1.60 .639 -4.427 49 .567
costing
tools questionnaire construction consistency of responses to Theory of
items. The Cronbach‟s alpha coefficient comes to α = (0.865) Constraints(TOC)
1.60 .639 -4.427 49 .534
on item 23 and N=50, which is higher than 0.5. As it can be
derived from table 4.33, the results indicated the importance 4.3. Ranking of currently using management accounting
of management accounting system tools significant. The system tools
tools representing the highest ranks with significant p value Getting a more refined depiction, the uses of management
are considered up separately and presented for maybe accounting system tools are also explored. While, exploring
knowing the range would help on understanding the the combination of preset twenty-three (23) set of
perception of management representative on management management accounting system tools, the management
accounting system tools. The detail is presented in table representatives had emphasized on five (5) set of
4.33. After arranging data, the determined values in higher management accounting system tools as significantly used in
side are: Budgetary control (2.80, SD=.495, t=11.431, 49, their respective banks. It is ranked in their mean score. The
p=.001); Ratio Analysis (2.80, SD=.452, t=12.522, 49, determination of the tools that majorly used by the banks
p=.001); Cash flow statement analysis (2.74, SD=.527, presently has considered on the Mean factor which would be
t=9.925, 49, p=.001); CVP Analysis (2.60, SD=.639, statistically significant at Mean Test Value=2, 95% C.I, that
t=6.641, 49, p=.001); and SWOT Analysis (2.46, SD=.613, means the management accounting system tools are used in
t=5.305, 49, p=.001). Therefore, Budgetary control, Cash the banks. This part of study has an outlook on the use of
flow statement analysis, CVP Analysis, Variance analysis, management accounting system tools in commercial banks in
Competitors Analysis, Inter firm comparison, Total Quality Nepal. Similarly, recalling the ranking was done with the
Management and Process Reengineering are important highest to lowest scores in a distribution with significantly t-
management accounting system tools. This is aligned with value. After arranging data, the following management
the following studies [13], [14], [15], [16] and [17] in which accounting system tools are used in these commercial banks
budgetary control, variance analysis, CVP analysis, fund of Nepal: Budgetary control(2.70, SD=.462, t=10.693, 49,
flow analysis, cash flow analysis, activity based costing, p=.001), Cash flow statement analysis (2.70, SD=.505,
TQM,TOC, business process reengineering, kaizen costing, t=9.800, 49, p=.001), Ratio Analysis (2.60, SD=.534,
segment reporting ,responsibility accounting, standard t=7.937, 49, p=.001), Variance analysis (2.56,
costing, target costing, balance scorecard, inter firm SD=.501t=7.897, 49, p=.001) and CVP Analysis(2.54,
comparison, JIT ,bench marking, variable and absorption SD=.503, t=7.584, 49, p=.001).The detail scores are
costing, competitions analysis, opportunity costing, SWOT presented in table 3. Therefore, budgetary control, Cash flow
analysis and ratio analysis tools are outlined. statement analysis, Ratio Analysis, Variance analysis and
CVP Analysis are the management accounting system tools
that are currently used by these commercial banks of Nepal.
This is aligned with the following studies [2], [14], [15],
[16], [17] and [18] in which budgetary control, variance
analysis, CVP analysis, fund flow analysis, cash flow accounting system tool in Nepalese commercial banks.
analysis, activity based costing, TQM, TOC, business Thereafter, they use other management accounting system
process reengineering, kaizen costing, segment reporting tools also in such rankings; Cash flow statement analysis,
,responsibility accounting, standard costing, target costing, ratio analysis, variance analysis and CVP analysis. Since
balance scorecard, inter firm comparison, JIT, bench globalization, liberalization, privatization, modernization and
marking, variable and absorption costing, competitors competition are the five pillars for strengthening the financial
analysis, opportunity costing, SWOT analysis and ratio sector, these concepts should be adhered to all the time in
analysis tools are outlined. developing strategy for Nepalese commercial banks. These
dimensions have opened Nepalese banking industry towards
Table 4 : Descriptive Statistics of Ranking of currently using a greater competition and application of Management
management accounting system tools Accounting System towards formulating and implementing
organizational strategy, to create a significant comprehensive
Management Test Value = 2 organizational performance. The main role of Management
accounting system Mean SD Sig. (2- Accounting System is to provide useful information in
t df
Tools tailed)
Budgetary control 2.70 .462 10.693 49 .001
helping banking managers make effective decisions.
Cash flow Organizational Strategy must be supported by appropriate
2.70 .505 9.800 49 .001
statement analysis organizational harmonized Management Accounting System.
Ratio Analysis 2.60 .534 7.937 49 .001 Management accounting system and strategy is found to
Variance analysis 2.56 .501 7.897 49 .001 have a greater influence over organizational performance.
CVP Analysis 2.54 .503 7.584 49 .001
Inter firm
Nepalese banks should focus on integration and application
1.96 .698 -.405 49 .687 management accounting system towards strategy formulation
comparison
SWOT Analysis 1.96 .637 -.444 49 .659 and implementation like adopting blue ocean strategy
Competitors concept. However, failure to provide appropriate information
1.94 .682 -.622 49 .537
Analysis may contribute to ineffective decisions, ineffective resource
Activity based
costing
1.92 .665 -.850 49 .399 management and decline in organizational performance. It is
Process also desirable; these banks should use management
1.86 .700 -1.414 49 .164
Reengineering accounting system as entrepreneurial firm rather remaining
Responsibility conservative firms. It can be achieved by placing importance
1.84 .650 -1.740 49 .088
accounting
on controls such as forecasting data, tight budget, cost
Kaizen costing 1.82 .719 -1.769 49 .083
Opportunity costing 1.82 .595 -2.137 49 .760 effectiveness, providing top management more control over
Total Quality results, developing a culture of continuous improvements,
1.80 .699 -2.021 49 .879
Management refinements and configuration around vision, mission and
Segment Reporting 1.78 .581 -2.674 49 .101 shared goals and the careful monitoring of outputs.
Target costing 1.76 .686 -2.471 49 .170
Balance score card 1.76 .716 -2.370 49 .218
Attribute costing 1.76 .743 -2.281 49 .569 References
Standard costing 1.72 .640 -3.093 49 .503 [1] Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (2003). Strategic
Life cycle costing 1.62 .696 -3.857 49 .847 Management: Concepts and Cases (12th ed.). New
Variable &
1.60 .670 -4.221 49 .463 York: McGraw-Hill.
absorption costing
Theory of
1.56 .643 -4.831 49 .757 [2] Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balance
Constraints
Just in Time 1.52 .646 -5.250 49 .530 scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School Publishing.
5. Discussion and conclusion
Furthermore, the perception of top management [3] Ittner, C. D., & Larker, D. F. (1997). Quality strategy,
representative of commercial banks in Nepal perceived strategic control systems, and organizational
management accounting system tools as significant in their performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society,
banking system. The exploration is based on the twenty-three 22(3/4), 293-314.
(23) preset management accounting system tools. Top
management representative of commercial banks in Nepal [4] Wilson, R. M. S. (1997). Strategic Cost Management.
perceived budgetary control as utmost significant tools in Dartmouth: Ashgate.
management accounting system in their banking system.
Likewise, ratio analysis, cash flow statement analysis, CVP [5] Dent, J. (1990). “Strategy, organization and control:
analysis, SWOT analysis, variance analysis, competitors Some possibilities for accounting research”. Accounting,
analysis, inter firm comparison, total quality management, Organizations and Society, 15, 3-25.
and process reengineering are the other management
accounting system tools are perceived significant in [6] Morgan, M. J. (1993). Accounting for strategy.
Nepalese commercial banks. Similarly, getting a more Management Accounting, 20-24.
refined representation, the uses of management accounting
system tools are also explored. While, exploring the [7] Otley, D. (1980). The contingency theory of
combination of preset twenty three (23) set of management management accounting: Achievement and prognosis.
accounting system tools, the management representatives Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413-428.
had emphasized on five (5) set of management accounting
system tools as significantly used in their respective banks. [8] Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York:
Budgetary control is the foremost used management Free Press.
Author Profile
Dr. Achyut Gnawali, is the Associate
Professor at Central Department of
Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu,
Nepal. He is Ph. D from the same
university. He is also involved in other
management higher education institute in
Kathmandu and visiting professor to the institutes all over
Nepal.