Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Transformation Through
Ariba Category Strategy
May 2005
Table of Contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Business Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Establishing Spend Management Transformation Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Main Challenge to Spend Management is the Functional Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Category Strategy to Spend Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Achieving Combined Benefits of Process Efficiency & Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Organizational Impact of Category Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Spend Management Transformation Savings Opportunity and Levers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Diagnostic Methodology & Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
How Ariba Addresses These Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
How Customers Have Benefited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Spend Management Transformation Through Ariba Category Strategy
Executive Summary
The Ariba Category Strategy methodology provides the framework to enable a marketing leading approach
to developing and executing a spend management transformation program. It enables the creation,
implementation, and best-in-class execution to end-to-end spend management processes across the
desired amount of spend while minimizing the amount of internal disruption.
The spend management marketplace has evolved over time from a simple reverse auction and transactional
procurement paradigm to an end-to-end, closed-loop spend management paradigm. However, a "one-
size-fits-all" approach to this process works well only for very simple categories and can limit achievable
savings, manageable spend, and business unit adoption. Ariba's Category Strategy approach groups
categories along common market and process characteristics to drive maximum realized savings and
stakeholder adoption through increased speed, sustainability and coverage.
Ariba's Category Strategy approach allows companies to go beyond software and services to develop an
integrated and phased category approach to sourcing and procure-to-pay process enablement of their
strategic spend categories. The category strategy approach combines together historical experience, savings
benchmarks and spend management best practices to deliver both quantitative and qualitative results.
Business Challenges
Today, most companies understand the need to fully manage all of their spend, but they face significant
challenges in trying to do so. First among these is the recognition that effective spend management
requires a comprehensive process to identify savings opportunities across all categories of spend.
Once these opportunities are identified the next step requires their conversion into contract-level
savings through strategic sourcing, procure-to-pay (P2P) processes through contract compliance, and
invoice capture and reconciliation.
The key challenge for any procurement organization is to implement spend management across all of
their unique spend categories while at the same time leveraging common tools and processes to
achieve economies of scale. The figure below shows the process steps involved in the spend
management process and the typical functions involved in each process step.
Identify Opportunity
This step involves analyzing spend within each category, across business units and suppliers and
identifying the areas that offer the best opportunity to realize savings. Opportunity assessment may be
triggered by contract expiration, changes in business or legislation, client needs, supplier relationships,
market price, and similar factors.
Develop Strategy
This step involves determining the most effective way to handle supplier engagement and negotiation for
each spend category by evaluating various criteria. These criteria are primarily related to the value of
the item being purchased to the business—usually measured by dollar volume or similar metrics—as
well as the item's sourcing complexity due to its uniqueness, supply-chain dependencies, price volatility,
or other considerations.
Source and Negotiate
The sourcing negotiation step comprises all the activities required to plan and negotiate agreements with
suppliers who can provide the goods and services companies must utilize. This includes analyzing
relevant information and effectively engaging and managing internal stakeholders before, during, and
after sourcing events.
This step involves all the processes needed to procure goods and services, negotiate and create contracts,
and ensure contract compliance. This includes taking the negotiated contract and establishing it in a
form that can be searched, managed, and leveraged in actual procurement with the ability to measure
and sometimes mandate compliance (i.e., permitting certain goods and services to be bought only
through an established contract).
The invoice and pay phase involves all the processes and communication required between the buyer's
accounts payable team, the supplier's accounts receivable team, and the banking institution for fund
transfer. This includes receiving and validating electronic invoices from suppliers based on the buyer's
invoice acceptance rules. Each invoice is then matched to the original purchase order and compared
against receivables as well as contract pricing and terms. Finally, invoices are reviewed and approved
for payment.
The monitor phase of the process involves using both quantitative and qualitative measures to discern
whether all spend and performance goals are being met and negotiated savings realized. Companies
must consistently and accurately track their spend, processes, and resources to measure the effectiveness
of their efforts and discern whether negotiated savings are actually being realized.
Spend management is a journey rather than a single event. It requires an ongoing process to effectively
manage all of a company's unique spend categories and to increase realized savings by continuing to
increase the rate and breadth of spend enabled across the business processes.
The functional strategy approach to spend management results in a number of problems. First, the
functional silos are not linked together either from a process perspective or from an organization
perspective. For example a reverse auctions approach to sourcing only effectively supports a small
portion of spend, possibly 20 to 30 percent in a typical company and is not suited for complex
categories of spend that necessitate strategic sourcing, knowledge sharing and process standardization.
Company procurement organizations typically adopt a one-size-fits-all catalog-based approach to their
purchasing process. Yet for most companies this meets the needs of only about four to five percent of
their spend. The remaining ~95 percent of spend within a typical company is complex and does not
lend itself to the catalog approach. As a result, many companies’ procurement organizations continue
to manage very little of their spend using automated catalog-enabled processes.
Most ERP-like invoicing and payment solutions execute invoice-PO reconciliation at the aggregate invoice
level and very rarely enforce contracts which are at the line item level. Further, this allows collecting data
only at Level 1 (aggregate invoice level) and not at Level 3 (i.e. line item level). Back-end controls are
usually not effective in enforcing best-practice purchasing policies, especially if data is collected at Level
1 as described above.
The figure below illustrates the example of the standard functional approach that companies typically
practice in their spend management. Each process step in managing each of their strategic spend
categories is in a silo and a one-size-fits-all approach is utilized.
The problems described above typically result in very little spend being managed by procurement
organizations from sourcing to procurement through put. As a result most companies obtained very little
in savings from their functional approach to spend management. The savings can be as low as three to
four percent of the total spend amount being managed.
In conclusion, the typical functional approach to spend management is easy for companies to introduce
and is seemingly efficient, given that procurement organizations adopt one process independent of
spend category, but it is not effective in achieving Spend Management transformation goals as
exemplified in the figure below.
The typical company functional approach to spend management uses a one-size-fits-all process to
spend management across all spend categories. This is simple and easy, but it only works for three to
four percent savings on a small portion of spend; i.e. it is efficient but not effective. On the other hand,
the category strategy approach can effectively manage a company's strategic spend, but it seems to
render spend management too complex; especially given that a typical enterprise has 100-150
categories; i.e. it is effective but not efficient as exemplified below:
This dilemma generates a significant question of how to adopt the category strategy approach to spend
management and make it efficient, simple and scalable, as well as effective at the same time.
One to two percent savings could be achieved in the "out" years on an annual basis by continuously
re-sourcing categories to exploit dynamic markets and match contracts with changing internal purchasing
patterns. The monitoring of category-specific Level 3 transaction data (price and quantities), the development
of an information backbone to drive sourcing decisions, and the ongoing measurement of supplier
performance can all be used as levers for further sourcing negotiations.
Given the vast number of categories that make up a typical spend base, companies have difficulty in
extending the savings methodologies and processes to all categories. This can be accomplished as
described above by grouping categories along common spend management methodologies and processes,
having dedicated resources on staff for each category group, and building tools and processes aligned
along these category P2P process groups.