Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of

Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport.
From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even shared first
place with another player. He took part in nine world championship matches, winning
them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he
played in thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of
thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to
perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an
amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the
perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995
Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with another
player. He took part in nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually
by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of
tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of
these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly
possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity
of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His
career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a
single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took part in
nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly
large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches
and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions,
playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games.
"Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan
Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship
matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-
year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing
many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was
as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion
Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian
and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950
to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with
another player. He took part in nine world championship matches, winning them all,
usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in
thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands
of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as
is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of
the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of
Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never
lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took
part in nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an
embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of
tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of
these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly
possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity
of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His
career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a
single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took part in
nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly
large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches
and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any
game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even
shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world championship
matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-
year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing
many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was
as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion
Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian
and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950
to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with
another player. He took part in nine world championship matches, winning them all,
usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in
thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands
of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as
is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of
the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of
Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never
lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took
part in nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an
embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of
tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of
these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly
possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity
of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His
career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a
single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took part in
nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly
large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches
and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan
Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions,
playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games.
"Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan
Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship
matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-
year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing
many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was
as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion
Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian
and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950
to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with
another player. He took part in nine world championship matches, winning them all,
usually by an embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in
thousands of tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands
of games. Of these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as
is humanly possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of
the longevity of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of
Fisher. His career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never
lost a single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took
part in nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an
embarrassingly large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of
tournaments, matches and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of
these he lost exactly seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly
possible," writes Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity
of Lasker, the invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His
career is unique in any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a
single tournament, or even shared first place with another player. He took part in
nine world championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly
large margin. In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches
and exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.Marion Tinsley was an amalgam of the longevity of Lasker, the
invincilibility of Petrosian and the perfection of Fisher. His career is unique in
any game or sport. From 1950 to 1995 Tinsley never lost a single tournament, or
even shared first place with another player. He took part in nine world
championship matches, winning them all, usually by an embarrassingly large margin.
In the 45-year period he played in thousands of tournaments, matches and
exhibitions, playing many tens of thousands of games. Of these he lost exactly
seven games. "Tinsley was as close to perfect as is humanly possible," writes
Jonathan Schaeffer.