Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
with friction
• Problem statement
• Rigidity matrix concept
• Computational procedure
• Applications
- One-dimensional problem
- Sliding
- Rode bending
• Future improvements
Problem statement
Two parts are initially separated, distance between them – initial gap
F – applied loads
initial gap
contact zone
Bodies may slide relative to each other according to the dry friction law
Rigidity matrix (1)
1
Deformatio n energy : W = U T ⋅ K ⋅ U , K - rigidity matrix
2
Elastic body
Fixations
Elastic body
Fixations
Elastic body
Fixations
F = ( f1x , f1 y , f1z , f 2 x , f 2 y , f 2 z , L , f nx , f ny , f nz )
T
Rigidity matrix (2)
Elastic body
Fixations
⎛ u1x ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎜ u1 y ⎟
⎜u ⎟
⎝ 1z ⎠
Area of possible contact Computational nodes
initial gap
contact zone
One-dimensional problem
Felastic Felastic
x1 x2 x3
F
Fтр
N −1 N
c T c 2
Energy of deformation: W ( x1 , x2 , K x N ) = ⋅ U KU = u N + c ∑ ui − c ∑ ui ui −1
2
2 2 i =1 i =1
F (H) x1 x2 x3
№ (м) (м) (м) Scheme of bodies displacements
1 3 0 0 0 x1 x2 x3 F
Fтр
x1 x2 x3 F
2 6 0 0 2
Fтр Fтр
3 9 0 1 6 x1 x2 x3 F
Fтр Fтр Fтр
x1 x2 x3 F
4 14 2 8 18
Fтр Fтр Fтр
2D sliding
• 2D deformable body
• Made of isotropic material
• Moves on the rigid foundation
• Gap between bodies initially is closed
F
Rigid foundation
2D sliding
• Compute rigidity matrix by mentioned
procedure
1
W = U T ⋅ K ⋅U → min
2
F
• All the nodes are contact ones: Rigid foundation
• Gap is zero: U y = 0
max U ANSYS
i =1, n
0.6
0.5
0.4
Error, % 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Force
Results comparison
max U calc − U ANSYS
Relative error : ε = i =1, n
max U ANSYS
i =1, n
Force = const
1.20
1.00
0.80
Error,% 0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
friction coefficient
Results comparison
Dependence of displacements in X-direction on the force value
3.50E-03
3.00E-03
2.50E-03
Force = 50H
2.00E-03 Force = 200H
Ux
Force = 800H
1.50E-03
Force = 3200H
1.00E-03
5.00E-04
0.00E+00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Node number
Results comparison
Dependence of displacements in X-direction on
the value of friction coefficient
6.00E-05
5.00E-05
4.00E-05 mu=0.05
mu=0.2
Ux 3.00E-05 mu=0.5
mu=1
2.00E-05
1.00E-05
0.00E+00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Node number
2D sliding
Fixations
y
Applied load xN
x
x2 5 mm
x1
1 mm
Gap elimination
• Contact problem
Calculation of sliding distances
Equilibrium equations: K ⋅ U = F
Coulomb-Mohr law: Fτ ≤ μ Fn
Iterative procedure
false
If F > Fmin
Done
true
0.0018
0.0016
0.0014
0.0012
sliding
0.001
Ux sticking
0.0008
0.0006
0.0004
0.0002
0
0 0.0025 0.005 0.0075 0.01 0.0125 0.015 0.0175 0.02 0.0225 0.025
Friction coefficient
Results
Dependence of displacement in X-direction on the
force value in the last node
0.012
0.01
Displacements
0.008
mu=0.15
0.006
mu = 0
0.004
0.002
0
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Force
Results
Dependence of relative error on the force value
max U calc − U ANSYS
Relative error : ε = i =1, n
max U ANSYS
i =1, n
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
Error 0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000
Force
Deformation shapes