Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Thank you for this opportunity to provide the enclosed comments on the Seattle Center Arena
Renovation Project DEIS. Through the month of May, Uptown Alliance and other neighborhood and
advocacy groups (Belltown Community Council, Queen Anne Community Council, American Institute of
Architects , Cascade Bicycle, Commute Seattle, Feet First, Queen Anne Greenways, Seattle
Neighborhood Greenways and Uptown Arts and Culture Coalition) met regularly to discuss and
formulate comments on the transportation analyses and proposed mitigation in the DEIS. Together we
offer these comments.
Over the years, Uptown Alliance and our community partners have forged a vision for a future with less
reliance on low occupancy vehicles and one which increases multimodal choices, creating more
equitable access throughout Seattle. It includes active sidewalks and streets that are safe, welcoming
and open to all. That vision celebrates bringing together locals and visitors from around the world to
experience the uniqueness of Seattle Center, its resident organizations and our neighborhoods.
We’re not alone in this vision. It’s supported by choices made by Seattleites with record transit
ridership, neighborhood walkability scores and the decline of households with vehicles. It is also
embraced in adopted planning documents across many City departments and specific to this project:
2017 Comprehensive Plan; Uptown Urban Design Framework (UDF); North Downtown Mobility Action
Plan (NODO MAP) Guiding Principles; Vision Zero, Move Seattle Levy’s Promise; City of Seattle’s Clean
Driving Initiative; Arena Community Advisory Group Guiding Principles for Transportation and Mobility;
City of Seattle and The Oak View Group MOU, Exhibit I; and many others.
This widely endorsed future can be more than just an aspiration. It will take an investment of time,
money, and perhaps most importantly a willingness to change our current methods and measures away
from low occupancy vehicles in favor of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders. When the Seattle
SuperSonics played in Key Arena the highest and best use of undeveloped land in Uptown was surface
parking lots that accommodated large crowds of sports event attendees causing gridlock on nearby
streets. Since that time, the urban landscape adjacent to Seattle Center has dramatically changed.
Uptown, Belltown and South Lake Union have become a dense urban center. The Arena renovation
provides a unique opportunity to be transformational and move the needle in a substantial way to
1
support Seattle’s urban neighborhoods and realize the vision of Uptown and its neighbors.
Page
Currently, Seattle Center operates on an economic model that relies heavily on parking revenue, which
in turn encourages the use of low occupancy vehicles, contrary to the goals and objectives of the
Uptown UDF as well as the multimodal and equitable access goals held by the City. The result is
increasing congestion in surrounding neighborhoods and frustrating (and potentially dangerous)
experiences for fans and patrons attending arena and other Seattle Center events. The Arena can serve
as a catalyst to strengthen Seattle Center’s long-term economic vitality as an iconic regional and local
destination. This requires that Seattle Center develops an economic model that reflects the City’s
stated mode split priorities and a revenue source that replaces the current dependency on parking fees.
The DEIS also misses the opportunity to recommend that Seattle Center and all its resident
organizations work together in developing a comprehensive Transportation Management Plan (TMP). If
the Arena’s TMP operates in isolation then its benefits will be limited.
“Decisions made about Uptown and Seattle Center will impact Seattle’s environment, access to arts
and cultural events, jobs, affordable housing, racial equity, and social justice for years to come,”
– Uptown & Seattle Center Strategic Parking Study, January 2017.
We couldn’t agree more. We can either collectively get this right before the first puck drops or we will
struggle for decades to come. We welcome the renovated Arena as an exciting new addition to Seattle
Center and believe working together we have an opportunity to become a model for other cities
around the world showing how a world class venue surrounded by vibrant urban neighborhoods can
support each other in creating livable, safe and welcoming communities while providing a great fan
experience for event attendees. Let’s show the world the creativeness of a Seattle solution!
Please see our attached mitigation requests that we believe will make that future a bright one for all.
Sincerely,
Matt Adkins
Charlie Bauman Rick Browning, AIA
Uptown Alliance Belltown Resident American Institute of Architects,
Seattle Chapter member
Vicky Clarke
2
Dean McColgan
Alana Knaster Andrew Koved Belltown Community Council,
Uptown Arts & Culture Coalition Queen Anne Greenways President
2. Develop TMP and DMP programs with measurable performance goals and annual report card | The DEIS offers no
specific goals or performance measures for the TMP or DMP. Additionally, the methodology of using Average and Above
Average attendance at the Arena fails to recognize the reality of compounded impacts of multiple events regularly held
on Seattle Center campus. Mitigation: Provide detailed TMP and DMP plans in the FEIS including measurable
performance goals, strategies, timing, funding, roles and responsibilities, annual reporting on operations to evaluate
whether goals are being met, and if not, what further mitigation is needed to meet goals. Mitigation should also include
use of an attendance range, such as described in the “Uptown and Seattle Center Parking Study,” (2017) and partnering
with Seattle Center and resident organizations to develop an integrated TMP and DMP program for the entire campus.
3. Mitigate impacts to surrounding neighborhoods | Fehr & Peers Technical Memo #4 describes “spillback” traffic into
surrounding neighborhoods as inevitable as the streets studied in the DEIS become more congested during Arena
construction and operation. Drivers using GPS apps, or their own knowledge of the street grid, will attempt shortcut
routes using alternate arterials and residential streets in Uptown, Queen Anne and Belltown. Mitigation: Engage these
communities and fund measures to lessen impacts to residents and local businesses.
4. Expand safety definition and improve safety conditions | The DEIS assessment on safety is based on a narrow
definition driven by a private vehicle-only focus that is inconsistent with the high priority City of Seattle places on its
Vision Zero Plan. The DEIS assumes that if intersections do not meet a “threshold for collision” there are no concerns
and thus no safety mitigation measures required. Mitigation: Include considerations of worker, pedestrian, and bicycle
safety during both construction and operations and fund a North Downtown Vision Zero area.
5. Narrow horizon year gap | The DEIS ignores the 15-year gap between the chosen 2020 and 2035 Horizon Years.
Between 2018-2034 significant changes will occur in the North Downtown neighborhoods and Seattle Center campus:
such as street grid re-connections over SR-99 (Harrison, Republican, Thomas); development spurred by Uptown
rezone; a new Seattle Public High School high school; ST2 light rail stations connecting more people to the Monorail;
One Center City plan completion with some or all projects implemented; major waterfront amenities open with a
circulator; the Alaskan Way Viaduct Reconstruction Project completed and open; ST3 station location study; potential
new connection to SR 99 via Harrison Street; and incremental road and transit improvements. Mitigation: Prioritize
mitigations during this period when traffic impacts will be at their peak, just before the ST3 light rail line opens.
6. Ensure mitigation is in place by opening day of the Arena | Mitigation: Provide a comprehensive mitigation plan that
gives a roadmap of how all necessary steps will be in place by opening day of the Arena to mitigate impacts outlined
above. The plan must include measurable performance goals, strategies, timing, funding, roles and responsibilities,
annual reporting on operations to evaluate whether goals are being met, and if not, what further mitigation is needed
4
to meet goals.
Page
1. Provide a Transportation Mitigation Plan (TMP) and Demand Management Plan (DMP) in the FEIS that includes
measurable performance goals, strategies, timing, funding, roles and responsibilities, annual reporting on
operations to evaluate whether goals are being met, and if not, what further mitigation is needed to meet goals.
2. Set aggressive multimodal performance goals and measures that result in the reduction of automobile travel and
increase other modes of transportation for walking, bicycling, transit and Monorail ridership. This will provide
more equitable access to the Seattle Center and lessen congestion to and through surrounding neighborhoods.
3. Establish and fund a three-party working group – Arena, Seattle Center, and City of Seattle – to explore a new
revenue model that moves the entire Seattle Center, its resident organizations and programming away from the
existing economic mode that is dependent upon parking fees which incentivizes low occupancy vehicle trips. Use
existing adopted City-wide and Uptown/Seattle Center planning documents for target outcomes (Uptown UDF,
Vision Zero, Move Seattle Levy promise, 2017 Comprehensive Plan and others).
39. Implement shuttles or circulator routes and incentives connecting to parking in South Lake Union, Denny Triangle
Page
2. Develop TMP and DMP programs with measureable performance goals and annual report card
The DEIS offers no specific goals or performance measures for the TMP or DMP. Additionally, the methodology of
using Average and Above Average attendance at the Arena fails to recognize the reality of compounded impacts of
multiple events regularly held on Seattle Center campus. Provide detailed TMP and DMP plans in the FEIS. Mitigation
should also include partnering with Seattle Center and resident organizations to develop an integrated TMP and DMP
program for the entire campus.
1. Fund a study and work with neighboring communities to look at impacts to 15th Avenue W, West Mercer Place,
Page
Queen Anne Drive at Aurora, Nickerson St, Westlake Avenue, the impacts from opening of the SR 99 north portal
Uptown Alliance Arena Review Committee June 6, 2018
and other general impacts on traffic through Belltown resulting from the lack of exits created by the Alaskan Way
Replacement Project.
2. Explore expansion of Residential Parking Zones (RPZs) in surrounding neighborhoods. If expanded RPZs are
supported, fund enforcement and education to prevent Arena customers and employees from circling the
neighborhood looking for free parking.
3. Fund additional enforcement of existing regulations to mitigate impacts in adjacent neighborhoods such as
blocking the intersection box and running red lights.