Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
UVMHealth.org/Childrens
PEDIATRIC ARDS:
What works, what doesn’t?
2
OUTLINE
• History of ARDS
• Pathology of ARDS
• Physiology of ARDS
• Diagnosing ARDS in pediatric patients
• Management interventions that help
• Management interventions that don’t help
3
ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME
4
CASE
5
INITIAL CXR
6
CXR 4 HOURS LATER
7
INITIAL PICU COURSE
8
ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME
(ARDS)
9
10
11
12
ETIOLOGY
13
PATHOLOGIC PHASES
• Fibrosis
14
ACUTE EXUDATIVE PHASE
• First week
– Capillary-alveolar barrier injury
• Damage to type I pneumocytes
– Development of protein-rich noncardiogenic pulmonary edema
– Netrophil activation and alveolar infiltration
– Hyaline membrane formation
– Pulmonary HTN
– Surfactant dysfunction
• Damage to type II pneumocytes
• Clinically:
– pulmonary edema, atelectasis, IPS, hypoxia, SIRS
16
SUBACUTE PROLIFERATIVE PHASE
• Clinically:
– ventilation impaired due to increasing dead space, improved
SIRS
17
FIBROSIS
18
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
19
An imbalance of forces across the pulmonary capillary walls can lead to interstitial and then
alveolar pulmonary edema.
21
NORMAL LUNG COMPLIANCE
23
V/Q MISMATCH
pathwaymedicine.org/ventilation-perfusion-ratio 24
WEST ZONES
26
ISSUES WITH ADULT DEFINITIONS
• Reliance on PaO2
• Reliance on mechanical ventilation
• PaO2/FiO2 ratio does not address vent management
27
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 June ; 16(5): 428–439
28
29
OXYGENATION INDEX
• OI = (MAP X %FiO2)/PaO2
– > 16 severe ARDS
– 25-40 Consider transfer for ECMO
– > 40 Consider ECMO
30
UVMHealth.org/childrens
31
INTERVENTIONS THAT HELP
32
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
33
VENTILATOR MANAGEMENT
• Maximize PEEP
– often require 10-15 cm H2O
– Alveolar recruitment
– Increases FRC
– Decreases shear forces
• Minimize VILI
– Small tidal volume (3-6 ml/kg) and low rates
– Permissive hypercarbia
• goal arterial pH >7.20
34
MAXIMIZING PEEP
35
OXYGEN DELIVERY/CONSUMPTION
36
OPTIMIZING FLUID BALANCE
37
UVMHealth.org/childrens
38
INTERVENTIONS THAT DON’T HELP
(IN STUDIES)
39
MODE OF VENTILATION
40
41
42
HFOV
43
NITRIC OXIDE (iNO)
44
ECMO
46
CXR HD 2
47
PICU COURSE
• HD 7 worsened
• Hypercarbia to pCO2 of 70’s
• Desaturation despite FiO2 100%
• OI = 26
• No response to iNO trial
• No difference in VC vs PC
48
CXR HD 7
49
CASE #2
50
SUMMARY
51
REFERENCES
1. Maffel FA, Thomas NJ (2012). Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. In Pediatric Critical Care Study
Guide. Lucking SE, et al (pp. 499-511). Springer.
2. The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress
Syndrome: Consensus Recommendations From the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus
Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 June ; 16(5): 428–439.
3. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. for the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institue
Acute Repiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-
management stratedies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2564-75.
4. Sokol J, Jacobs SE, Bohn D. Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children
and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD002787.
5. Albert BD, Ushay M, Arnold J. Does mode of mechanical ventilation produce a measurable
difference in patient outcomes? In Current Concepts in Pediatric Critical Care 2016 Ed.
6. Chacko B, Peter JV, Tharyan P, et al. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation for
acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome
(ARDS). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1):CD008807.
7. Rittayami N, Katsios CM, Beloncle F, et al. Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation in
acute respiratory failure: a physiology-based narrative and systematic review. Chest.
2015;148:340-355.
8. Gupta P, Green JW, Tang X, et al. Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and
conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:243-
249.
52
UVMHealth.org/childrens
THANK YOU