Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Essential Economics
Economic Anal ysis
SEMF
Waste Water – Engineering and Environmental
Milan Prodanovic
Traffic Engineering
The project has been overseen by a Steering Committee established to guide and oversee the
development of the master plan which has included representatives of:
This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under Copyright Act 1963, no part may be
reproduced without written permission of the Emma Riley & Associates.
Photography
All photographs unless otherwise referenced have been provided by Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service,
Emma Riley & Caroline Lindus. Precedent images in The Master Plan have been provided by Playstreet Pty
Ltd.
Disclaimer
This master plan has been prepared for the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service and is intended for the
specific purpose to which it refers. While every responsible effort has been made to ensure that this
document is accurate and complete, the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service, ERA Planning Pty Ltd and its
subconsultants do not warrant or represent that the information contained is free from errors or omissions
and disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything
done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
3
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Executive Summary
Why Master Plan? The tourism industry in Tasmania is
economicall y and sociall y important. It
The jewel in the crown of directl y and indirectl y contributes to over
10 per cent of the Gross State Product and
Tasmania’s East Coast: The
about 7.2 per cent of total employment. On
Freycinet Peninsula is a unique the East Coast of Tasmania, the tourism
and special place. industry has an even greater impact
A rich and complex environment formed by providing up to 19 per cent of employment
significant natural values, spectacular and in the municipal area where the Freycinet
grand landscapes and a long cultural history Peninsula is located.
extending from Aboriginal occupation, There are challenges that this growth brings,
European discovery and modern day particularl y given its complex range of
settlement. It is no wonder it is both an environmental, cultural and social values.
important place for Tasmanians and one of Where the sensitive and fragile environments
the ma jor destinations for visitors to the are juxtaposed with local settlements and
State. valued recreational opportunities. Concerns
The master plan is a key tool for the are emerging from locals and industry
Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service and about the future impacts of ongoing growth
industry to achieve the objectives of the in visitor numbers. Both on the values of
government’s Tasmania Visitor Economy the Freycinet Peninsula and the Tasmanian
Strategy 2015-2020. brand. The provision of visitor services and
support infrastructure has not remained
Approximatel y 300,000 visitors to the commensurate with its role as a key visitor
state arrive at the Freycinet Peninsula per destination in Tasmania.
year, hoping to experience what makes
the place so special. The Wineglass Bay
lookout and track within the Freycinet
National Park is the ma jor attraction, giving
visitors an opportunity to experience what
Tasmania does best: its natural environment.
Visitors ascend through the Hazards on the
Wineglass Bay track, in a journey to glimpse
the wildness of Tasmania.
Tasmania as a visitor destination has
emerged on a global scale and the past few
years have seen unprecedented growth.
No other place in Tasmania demonstrates
this more than the Freycinet Peninsula. The
peninsula has seen an increase in visitor
numbers exceeding 9 per cent per annum for
the last 5 years.
i
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
ii
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Employment Creation
Employment arising from the capital
expenditure and construction employment
associated with building the new
infrastructure, including the Visitor Gateway
Hub, is another important benefit. The
master plan can be expected to generate
nearl y 58 direct full time equivalent (FTE)
jobs from the experience initiatives alone
(excluding the sewerage treatment project).
A further 92 indirect (or flow on) FTE jobs
in suppl y industries can be expected to be
generated in the wider economy during the
construction phase through industry and
consumption effects.
The sewerage treatment project will generate
an estimated 47.6 FTE construction jobs over
the course of the construction period with a
further 76 FTE indirect (or flow-on) jobs in
suppl y industries. Total direct and indirect
employment associated with the construction
of the sewerage treatment project would
therefore total 124 FTE jobs.
Assuming 15 per cent of the indirect jobs are
retained in the local area, implementation
of the capital works in the master plan will
result in nearl y 145 new full time jobs or an
increase in the total number of people in
employment of approximatel y 8.8 per cent.
Ongoing employment arising from the
increase in visitor spending of $20.2m is
expected to support a further 100 jobs in the
service sector for the local area.
iii
THE BENEFITS OF THE MASTER PLAN
protection of
Tasmanian brand
world class
visitor experience
uplift in
\ visitor spending
fewer cars in the of $20.2m
National Park
reduction in
investment barriers
72 full time
local jobs
protection of
natural & cultural
values
Realisation
a new of the
Great Short Walk
Master Plan safe and clean
waterways
a liveable
town
appreciation of wide range of
cultural values transport options
safer road
and pedestrian opportunities
environment for private
investment
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
The Path to the Master Plan Stakeholders identified they valued the
area’s natural assets, the amount and variety
The master planning process began with
of recreational opportunities as well as
two key steps: stakeholder engagement and
the peace and quiet of the environment,
background anal ysis.
which provides an opportunity for people
Stakeholder engagement, integrated into to ‘escape’. They were concerned about
the earl y phases of the project, provided environmental impacts on the National
an opportunity to explore what is important Park from overuse, noise from helicopters
about the Freycinet Peninsula, what the and jet skis, impacts on safe swimming and
current issues are and what people value snorkelling from boats and jet skis, cruise
about the place. ships in Wineglass Bay and increased vehicle
usage.
The outcomes of this engagement process
identified that traffic and wastewater The background anal ysis was extensive,
management were the two key issues that given the array of relevant reports,
stakeholders wanted to see improved. strategies and data. This master plan has not
Other potential improvements related to attempted to summarise all that information
management of people in the National Park but has pointed the reader in the direction of
and boat trailer parking within Coles Bay. where to find additional information.
From this process, the ma jor issues and
opportunities were identified. The master
addresses the issues while the opportunities
are harnessed.
seasonality
constraints within the national park
slowing visitors down
breadth of recreational opportunities
brand damage
peak periods values of the national park
physical constraints
moulting lagoon marketing
traffic, access and parking interpretation
bushfire risk
crowding and rubbish additional experiences
location of Coles Bay
wastewater managment
alignment between private and public sectors
visitor accommodation product
visitor arrival
lack of staff accommodation
community support
v
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
vi
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
vii
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
viii
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
ix
High granitic mountains whose summits are almost
completely barren, form the whole eastern coast of this
part of Van Diemen’s Land. They rise sheer from the
base. The country which adjoins them is extremely low
and cannot be seen unless viewed from only a little
distance at sea.
It is to this strange formation that we must doubtless
attribute the errors of the navigators who had preceded
us into these waters and who had mistaken these high
mountains for as many
separate islands.
Mr Bailly’s description of the Freycinet Peninsula, Baudin Expedition, 1802
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
CONTENTS
Page No.
01 Introduction 1
About Freycinet 2
Report Structure 3
Why Master Plan 3
Inputs into the Master Plan 4
02 Site Context 7
Peninsula Context 8
The Peninsula Through Time 10
Land Tenure 13
Policy Context 17
03 Engagement Outcomes 29
The Approach 30
Engagement Outcomes 31
04 Existing Conditions 33
Tourism Snapshot 34
Activities within the National Park 35
Private Tour Operators 37
Accommodation on the Freycinet Peninsula 38
Current Issues 41
Opportunities 46
xi
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
06 Implementation 87
Timing 88
Responsibility 88
Economic Benefit 88
Cost Benefit 90
Delivery Model for Visitor Gateway Hub 91
Business Model for Visitor Centre 91
Planning & Environmental Approvals 92
xii
This p age is intentionall y bl ank
Chapter 01
Introduction
01 Introduction
The Freycinet Peninsula is a unique and special place for
Tasmanians. It is a rich and complex environment, with significant
ecological and marine values, stunning landscapes, a tapestry
of Aboriginal occupation, European discovery and modern day
settlement and diverse recreational opportunities.
2
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
3
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
In this context, the master plan is a strategic Inputs into the Master Plan
decision making tool that:
The preparation of this master plan has
• Identifies the overall values of the place involved considerable background research.
which should be protected. Specific studies, reports and strategies
reviewed include:
• Confirms and reinforces the importance
of the Freycinet Peninsula to the tourism • Tasmanian Visitor Engagement Strategy
industry in Tasmania. (T21) prepared by Department of State
Growth.
• Provides the opportunity to enhance
the visitors’ experience to a world-class • Parks 21 prepared by TPWS and the
standard. Tourism Industry Council of Tasmania.
4
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Wreak age of the Viol a at Friendl y Beaches (Photo Credit: Tasmania P arks and Wildlife Ser vice
5
This p age is intentionall y bl ank
Chapter 02
Site Context
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
02 Context
Peninsula Context The ‘Fisheries’ located near the trail head car
park for the Wineglass Bay lookout and track
The Freycinet Peninsula is located on is a small holiday settlement surrounded by
Tasmania’s East Coast, a two and a half hour the Freycinet National Park. The Fisheries,
drive from both Hobart to the south and unlike Coles Bay and Swanwick, maintains a
Launceston to the north. It is located just off traditional shack like character with narrow
the Great Eastern Drive, a designated road- gravel roads, limited infrastructure and
based tourism experience extending along heavy vegetation cover.
the Tasman Highway from Orford northwards
to St Helens. Other ma jor commercial activities within the
Freycinet Peninsula are tourism based being
A key feature of the peninsula is the Freycinet Lodge, Edge of the Bay Resort,
Freycinet National Park. The park covers an Saffire Resort and Freycinet Air. Freycinet
area of 169km 2. It extends in a linear fashion Marine Farm, produces both oysters and
down the eastern side of the Peninsula until mussels for sale in addition to a visitor
just south of Coles Bay where it extends experience through their farm tours and
across the entire peninsula area southwards restaurant.
to encompass Schouten Island.
8
Bicheno
ive
Dr
rn
s te
Ea
t
ea
Gr
* Devils Corner
* Friendly Beaches
Cranbrook Ta s m a n S e a
Moul t i ng
L a goon
Swanwick
Swansea
Coles Bay * Cape Tourville
The Fisheries
*
Wineglass Bay Lookout
* Wineglass Bay
G re a t O y s t e r B a y
FREYCINET
NATIONAL PARK
Schouten Island
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
10
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
11
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
The Fisheries in the 1920s Photo Credit: Tasmania Archives and Heritage
Earl y visitors came by boat or steamer from During this visit the scientific members of
Swansea until the construction of the Coles the party recorded species of shell hitherto
Bay Road. unknown in Tasmania. The field naturalists
were strong advocates of protecting the area
Harry Parsons, a retired auctioneer moved through the creation of a national park and
to Coles Bay in the 1920s and promoted the expressed concerns about the overhunting of
potential of the area. He established earl y birds and animals.
shacks at The Fisheries. By 1934 the Chateau
holiday units, which is now Freycinet Today part of the Freycinet Peninsula, and
Lodge, was established by Ron Richardson specificall y the land known as the ‘horse
who leased the land from the Tasmanian paddocks’, is still used by scientific clubs for
Government. recording and documenting native flora and
fauna.
12
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Land Tenure
The ma jority of land within the Freycinet
Peninsula is under public ownership and is
managed by TPWS. This includes the national
park, Coles Bay Conservation Area, Moulting
Lagoon Game Reserve and other public
reserves. Privatel y owned land is focussed in
and around Coles Bay and Swanwick as well
as former pastoral land along Coles Bay Road
between the Tasman Highway intersection
and Swanwick.
13
Land Tenure
Key
Public
Private
Friendly Beaches
Ta s m a n Sea
Moul t i n g L a goon
Swanwick
Cape Tourville
G re at Oys ter Ba y
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Bay
1:100.000
Cape Tourville
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Bay
Promise Bay
G re a t Oys ter Ba y
Ta s m a n S e a
Schouten Passage
Schouten Island
The favourite picnic ground of the residents of
Swansea, who for many years have enjoyed its
numerous advantages with never tiring delight.
Description of Coles Bay in an 1895 tourist brochure for the Swansea district
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
17
Management Plan Zoning
Key
Recreation Zone
Conservation Zone
Friendly Beaches
Ta s m a n Sea
Moul t i n g L a goon
FREYCINET NATIONAL
PARK
Swanwick
Cape Tourville
G re at Oys ter Ba y
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Bay
1:100.000
Cape Tourville
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Bay
Promise Bay
G re a t Oys ter Ba y
FREYCINET
NATIONAL PARK
Schouten Passage
Ta s m a n S e a
Schouten Island
20
Photo Credit: Jenni Burdon
Planning Scheme Zoning
Key
Recreation
Rural Resource
Significant Agricultural
Utilities
Environmental Management
Friendly
Beaches Particular Purpose
Ta s m a n Sea
M oul t i n g L a goon
Swanwick
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Lookout
Wineglass Bay
1:100.000
Cape Tourville
Coles Bay
The Fisheries
Wineglass Lookout
Wineglass Bay
Promise Bay
G re a t Oys ter Ba y
FREYCINET
NATIONAL PARK
Schouten Passage
Ta s m a n S e a
Shouten Island
24
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
25
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
26
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
27
This p age is intentionall y bl ank
Chapter 03
Engagement
Outcomes
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
03 Engagement Outcomes
The Approach Facilitated Workshops
The development of the master plan Due to the significant interest in the project,
commenced with an engagement process to the consultant team undertook facilitated
better understand what is important about workshops in both Launceston and Hobart.
the Freycinet Peninsula, what are current Both workshops were well attended, with 17 in
issues and what the community values are. attendance in Launceston and 23 in Hobart.
The workshops discussed a small number
The engagement process involved: of key questions to gain an understanding
of what people value at Freycinet, and
• one on one meetings with key what they had concerns about. In addition,
stakeholders; discussions about what they would like to
see happen at Freycinet were also a focus.
• a drop in session in Coles Bay; The questions included:
The engagement process did not involve any • What suggestions do you have for the
surveys of visitors to the Freycinet Peninsula. future of Freycinet?
Every few years TPWS undertakes a visitor
survey that captures some visitor behaviour. One on One Sessions
However, there is no comprehensive anal ysis
The consultant team undertook over 20 one
of visitor feedback that can be used to
on one sessions for the project with business
assist in determining issues relevant to their
owners, community groups, tourism and
experience.
business organisations and government
organisations. These were invaluable in
Data from the Tasmanian Tourism Tracer
terms of understanding the specifics of
study currentl y being undertaken by the
people’s businesses and interests.
University of Tasmania provided up to date
information about tourists visiting the state,
Written Feedback
their expectations, time spent at destinations
and where people travelled from and to. This There were several interested parties that
information was also utilised to understand were unable to attend either the drop-in
the movement of tourists on the peninsula. session or workshops. The consultant team
spoke with many of them briefl y about the
Drop in Session
project and then received written feedback
The consultant team undertook a site outlining their interest in the Peninsula and
inspection at the beginning of November and what they’d like to see in the future.
as part of that, made themselves available
at the Community hall for four hours for any
interested residents or visitors to the area.
This session had approximatel y 12 attendees
many of whom stayed for some time to
discuss their interest in the area.
30
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Engagement Outcomes
The full findings of these workshops, drop in
sessions, one on one consultation and written
responses can be found in Appendix A. For
the most part there were consistent themes.
These are outlined over page.
Shuttle buses.
Traffic management.
Cap on visitor numbers.
Safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
Ferry transport.
Improved car and trailer parking
within Coles Bay. New carpark.
Solution to sewage. Pulling the information centre
out of the National Park.
Better management of people in the
park
31
This p age is intentionall y bl ank
Chapter 04
Existing Conditions
TOURISM SNAPSHOT
Visitor Growth has averaged 3.7% per year over last 10 years and 9.6% over the last
five years.
Nearl y 30% of all visitors to Tasmania go to the East Coast region and 75% of these go to
the Freycinet Peninsula.
The Wineglass Bay lookout and track within the Freycinet National Park is the most visited
place on the Freycinet Peninsula.
Approximatel y 65% of all visitors to the National Park go the Wineglass Bay lookout. 40%
of visitors to the National Park visited Wineglass Bay Beach as well as Cape Tourville.
Sleepy Bay is visited by 19%, Honeymoon Bay by 17% and Friendl y Beaches by 8%.
The average length of time that visitors spend within the Freycinet National Park is
3 hours.
Onl y 14% of visitors to the Freycinet National Park are from Tasmania.
70% of all these visitors are on their first visit to the National Park.
The top country origins for international visitors are from China (6.8%) including Hong
Kong and Taiwan, UK (3.7%), USA (3.4%), Germany (2.3%) and Singapore (2.1%).
55+ and 25-29 years are the top ages for International visitors to the Freycinet Peninsula.
Day visitors are most likel y to be travelling in a south to north direction along the East
Coast after an overnight stay in Hobart.
Average overnight visitor spend on the East Coast is $125 for domestic visitor and $164 for
international visitors per 24 hour period.
Average day visitor spend on the East Coast is $89 per day.
(this information is sourced from the Tasmanian Visitor Survey undertaken by Tourism Tasmania and the Tourism
Tracer Project undertake by the University of Tasmania. The figures from Tourism Tasmania were accurate as of 1
December 2017).
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
04 Existing Conditions
Activities within the National Park Key walks within the National Park include:
The main entrance into the Freycinet • Wineglass Bay lookout (Great Short
National Park is immediatel y south of Coles Walk);
Bay on Freycinet Drive. The existing Visitor • Wineglass Bay traverse (Great Short
Centre at Rangers Creek approximatel y Walk);
300 metres inside the entrance to the
Park, provides for the purchase of parks • Hazards Beach circuit (Great Short Walk);
passes, visitor information, a small shop and
interpretation. Key areas within the National • Mt Amos;
Park are:
• Cooks Beach to Bryans Beach;
• Richardsons Beach providing a safe and
• Cooks Beach to Wineglass Bay (via Mt
shallow beach area for families (which
Graham);
also has designated fee-based camping
spots for RVs and tents booked through • Mt Freycinet;
peak season using a ballot system);
• Cape Tourville (Great Short Walk);
• Honeymoon Bay, a popular spot for
snorkelling and ‘selfies’ (which also has • Sleepy Bay; and
designated fee-based camping spots for
tents booked through peak season using • Friendl y Beaches (Great Short Walk).
a ballot system);
35
Existing Conditions
Main intersection
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft) visitor information booth
Key
Experience nodes
Transport nodes
Experience nodes
within National park
Friendly Beaches
Moulting Lagoon
Moult i n g
La g o o n
Ta s m a n Sea
FREYCINET NATIONAL
PARK
Sleepy Bay
G re a t Oys ter Ba y
Wineglass Lookout
Wineglass Bay
37
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
38
As the visitor ascend the track entering the saddle between
Mt Amos and Mt Mayson they orientate themsel ves
southwards with expansive views across the Isthmus to
Mt Freycinet, Mt Graham and beyond.
1 Vehicle Counter
Walker Counter
1 Friendly Beaches
Vehicle Entries:
June 2012 - 40k
January 2014 - 31k
April 2017 - 37k
5 Mt Amos Track
Walker Numbers:
June 2012 - 5k
Freycinet Visitor December 2014 - 4k
The
Car park December 2015 - 9k
Fisheries
April 2017 - 27k
9 Isthmus
Walker Numbers:
Mt. Freycinet (walker passes both directions)
January 2012 - 24k
January 2015 - 42k
November 2016 - 44k
10 10 Cooks Beach
Walker Numbers:
(walker passes both directions)
Vehicle and Walker numb ers within the Freycinet National P ark through to
3 to 4k per annum.
June 2016 (Source: Tasmania P arks and Wildlife Ser vices
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
41
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
42
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
43
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
44
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
45
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
46
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
47
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Static Interpretation
The current interpretation on the Freycinet
Peninsula is found predominantl y within the
National Park itself, although new signage
has been installed at Moulting Lagoon.
It ranges from high quality interactive
interpretation at Cape Tourville, signage in
various languages about the Park, through
to more traditional panels about the flora
and fauna. There is limited information on
Aboriginal cultural heritage as well as more
recent historical events.
Good interpretation is designed to fit into the
spatial structure of the experience. It aims
to inform, provoke and inspire the visiting
public. Interpretation should help the visitor’s
understanding of the experience and also
encourage positive interaction.
48
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
The Great Eastern Drive marketing strategy has b een enormousl y succesful
49
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
50
Chapter 05
The Master Plan
THE VISION
Master Pl an Principles
53
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
54
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
55
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
KEY INITIATIVES
The master plan comprises five key
initiatives. These have been identified to
achieve the vision in accordance with the
planning principles.
These key initiatves are:
• the Visitor Gateway Hub;
• the Entrance Corridor;
• Experience nodes;
• a network of transport connections; and
• a staged sewerage treatment system.
Spatial representation of these key initiatives
is shown on pages 58 through to 61.
Details of each initiative are outlined on
subsequent pages. Concept plans are
included for the Visitor Gateway Hub,
the entrance corridor, new and modified
experience nodes as well as the detailed
boat transport strategy.
56
The Master Plan
Main intersection Key
1
Experience nodes
VC Visitor centre /
transport interchange
Transport nodes
Experience nodes
within National park
Moulting Lagoon
shared trail
Friendly Beaches
2 Friendly Beaches
to Visitor Gateway
shared trail
Swanwick to
Coles Bay walking
trail
3 Moulting Lagoon
M oul t i n g L a goon
Ta s m a n Sea
FREYCINET
NATIONAL
PARK
B2 S2
13 Wineglass Bay
Refer detail plan
1:100.000
* New experience with * Camp site (tent only) Layby 1 space 5 spaces - - -
interpretation * Honeymoon Bay Short
8 Honey Moon Bay
walk
* Passive recreation/beach
* Existing facility * Short Walk Layby 1 space 5 spaces - - -
9 Sleepy Bay * Passive recreation/
beach
* Existing facility * Camping (tent & 4WD RV) - 5 spaces 1 spaces 2 spaces -
11 White Water Wall * Upgrade and designate camp * Short Walk
sites * Passive Recreation
* Existing facility * Walking track - - - - -
12 Wineglass Bay * Upgrade * Interpretation
Lookout Additional lookout
B1 Tourist boat 7
operators
Rich ard so n s
Beac h
Freycinet Lodge S
S
Great Oys ter
B3
Ba y
S
8 S
Honeymoon Bay
Proposed
The Fisheries PWS shared
trail
Wineglass Bay
S2 s
Trackhead
B2
d
r
a
z
a
M t A m o s
12
e
Wineglass Bay
Lookout
h
T
Mt Ma ys on
Win e g l a ss
Wineglass Bay 13 B a y
S3
10
Cape Tourville
habilitate sewage
atment plant
Proposed
PWS shared
trail
S 9
Sleepy Bay
S
Ta s m a n Sea
M t P a rson s
M t B a u d in
Experience nodes
Experience nodes
within National park
Proposed Shuttle
Aqua taxi
Cycle trail
Primary pedestrian
connection from Visitor
Gateway Hub to Town centre
and tourist boat operations
Visitor Gateway Hub and signage to limit traffic past the entrance
point to local traffic onl y. A sense of arrival
The Visitor Gateway Hub is the primary for visitors will be created through a visual
initiative underpinning the master plan. It will sequence which includes thematic signage
serve as the point of connection between the and landscaping.
arrival corridor, Coles Bay and the National
Park. It will also be the anchor point for the Car parking areas will be divided up to
new transportation strategy. minimise broad expanses of hard stand and
will provide for car, coach, trailer and RV
Importantl y, the visitor’s arrival sequence parking as well as boat trailer parking to
which commenced at the Tasman Highway cope with overflow parking from the public
intersection will culminate at theVisitor boat ramp off Garnet Drive.
Gateway Hub.
The new visitor experience centre building
The Visitor Gateway Hub will be located will be located close to the intersection of
adjacent to the north of the Coles Bay on Jetty Road and Freycinet Drive to provide
Crown land along Freycinet Drive generall y for the greatest possible level of physical
between the Esplanade and Jetty Road. The connectivity to Coles Bay for pedestrians.
centre piece will be a new integrated visitor This is essential to activate the full extent of
experience centre providing a centralised the transport strategy and encourage some
location for visitor information and ticketing modal shift for journeys within the Coles Bay/
for both TPWS and private tour operators. National Park area.
The centre will also offer opportunities
to learn about the area and talk with It is critical that the new building is of high
informative local ambassadors, access quality architectural design with a thoughtful
digital interface facilities, such as recharging approach to spaces, materials, finishes
stations and free wifi, public toilet and and importantl y its environment. Creating
shower facilities. anticipation for the next stage of the journey
through capturing view corridors to the
Space within the visitor experience centre Hazards, landscaping and interpretation
will be allocated for ancillary commercial should be key design criteria.
services, such as small scale retail (like that
which currentl y exists within the existing Adjacent to the new building will be the
visitor centre), a café or lounge space and shuttle bus arrival and departure point and
bike hire use. These present opportunities connecting to the building will be cycling and
for private businesses, although the scale will pedestrian connections into Coles Bay and
be limited to avoid undermining the existing to the new shared use trail extending to the
town centre on Garnet Avenue and Iluka Wineglass Bay trailhead.
Village, both of which are within walking Essential to the visitor experience will be
distance of the Visitor Gateway Hub. landscaping creating an atmosphere of
The visitor experience centre will present a immersion in the natural environment.
seamless and integrated visitor experience Around the building and car parking areas
where visitors can purchase their parks it will diminish the extent of hardstand
pass, learn about experiences available on intergrating it with existing native
the Freycinet Peninsula, how these can be vegetation. Between the hub and residential
packaged together, places to eat, shop and sites along Freycinet Drive it will provide
the best way to move around the town and a visual buffer. Landscaping will also
the day use areas of the National Park. An incorporate water sensitive design measures
essential component is for the visitor to be to minimise the environmental impact of the
encouraged to access experiences either stormwater from the car parking, access and
through the shuttle bus system, walking building on water quality.
cycling or boating.
Entrance to the Visitor Gateway Hub will be
from Coles Bay Road with road re-alignment
62
Pot
Po
o ent
ential
ial
al ad
a ditti
tion
onal
a
al
ove
verfl
rfllow
rflow w Car
a PaPark
rk
Po ent
Pot ential
i
ia
ac
acc
ccomm
ommmoda
odatio
tio
ion
n area
area
e
(in
ndic
dic tive
dicati ve
e onll y)
Rem
emovi
ov ng exi
existi
sting
sti ng
visito
visito
torr
inf
inform
nform
ormati
att on poi
point
nt and
a
r ege
rev egetat
tate
tat e the
the are
area a Potent
Potenttial
a
al
Ove
O
Ovverfl
v rffflow
ow Car
Car
Ca
ar
lo p walk to looko
loo lo
ooko
okou
ok ut
Par
Pa
Park
Par ark
Reh
Reh ab
abilittat
ate
te
e sti
ex
exi st ngg Ped
Pe
edest stria
stria
ri ia
an
cirrc
cul
cuula
ati
tiion
o
on
Create
Cre a ne
ate new
w road
o
Reh
Rehab
h abi
abilit
littate
a ex xist
stting
alignm
ali gn ent an
gnm andd
gravel tr
gravel trail
ailss thro
ail hrro
hro
hr ough
ughout
ug out
u
int
n erssecttiion
on
Re abi
Reh b littate
a
road after
road fte
ter new w
roadwo
roadworksrks
ks Bus
us dr
d op off
f
S nag
Sig ge/
e/ way
ay
yfin
nding
din
ing Cov
Co
overed way to
ove o
drop
drop offf are
reaa
Wa er
Wat e sen
e sit
ittive Car
C ar Pa
Pa
Park
arrk
rk
urb
u
ur
r an
rb an des
desig
iig
gn
Car
C ar dr
d op
p off
Viissiito
V or Ce
ent
n re
e
Forec
Fo
Forec
eco
co
ourt
rtt
Deliv
Del
Delive
ivery
ivery
yaare
ea//
bac
ac
ck of hous
ousee
V E G E TAT I O N B UF F E R
Shuttl
Shu ttll e
tt
Muir
Muirss Be
ir B ac
ach p ku
pic up/d
p/d
/drop
rop p of
of
Cole
Cole
Co es Ba
a y Vi
Villllag
lag
ge
Nar
arrow
r
row in
nte
erect
ction
io
on to
o to
ena
able
ble tr
traff
affic
affic
c ca
cal
almmin
ing
in
an
and
an
nd sa
s fe cro
ro
osssi
siing
ng
llu
luka Pre
P ci
cin
inct
c
ct
ref.. plan
ref la
a de
detai
detai
ta l Illu
uk
ka pr
p e in
prec inc
ct
1:2000 T tow
To own ce
c nt
ntre
re
e
Pottenttia
ial
accomm
accomm
ac ommod od tion area
oda r
(in
indic
ndi
dicative
dic ve on nl y))
RV Par
arkking - 17
17 Sp
Spac
a s
ace
Car
C ar Pa
Park
k - 150 Spa
S ceess
e
Exi
xisti
xisting
sti ng
g veg
vegeta
ve eta
et
tatio
tio
ionn
Overfl
Overfl
flow
fl ow ca
car
arr pa
a park.
k. In
Integ
teg
te
teg
egratee wate
er
se
sen
e sit
en sitive
ive
ve
e ur
urban
baan de
an esig
s n
si
W er
Wa
Wat er sen
sen
ensit
sitive
ittive
ve
urb
ban
an des
essiign
gn
Ex sti
Existing
ng
g vegeta
atio
tion
n
Bo
Bo
Boa
oatt T
oa Ta
ail er
ail er Par
arking
arkin
arking -
kin Pot
oten
o entia
ent ial
Rev
Revege
evege
egetat
tation
at on 110
0 Spaces
Spapacess
pa loop walk
lo
loop walk to lo
looko
okout
ut
Existi
st ng
g veg
e etatio
egeta tion
ion
Cre
reatee new
ne
e road
alignm
al
alignment
gnm en an
ent and
d
in ers
int r ect
ection
ion
n
Existi
Exi
x st ngg Existi
ssti
t ng
g veg
vegeta
etatio
tion
n
vegeta
atio
t n
Bus
Bu
B use
us
ses
es dro
drop offf
Shelte
Shelterr
Busess Par
Parkin
ng
10 Sppaces
ace
ces
ce Main caarr par
park.
k
Inte
In tegrat
teg rate water sens
ens
nsiti
iiti
tive
ve urb
rrb
ban
n des
essig
ign
gn
gn
Water
Wa e senssi
sit
itive
urba
urb a dessign
an g
Exi
x sti
sting
n veg
ng vegeta
etati
tio
on
DDA
DAA ca
car
Ca
ar Pa
ark
rk - 200
20
000S
Sppaces
ess pa
par
arrkin
ar kiin
k
kin
ing
Con
onnec
on
onnec
ectio
t n to
tio Car
Ca
ar dro
ar drop
drop off
offf
luk
ka Prec
recinc
re inc
nc
ct Viisi
s to
or Ce
Cent
enttre
Deliv
Del iv
ive
ve
ery
ry are
ea/
ba k of h
bac
ba hous
ouse
ous
Exi
E xisti
x ting
ti g
v eta
veg e ti tio
on For
oreco
orecour
eco
ec ur
urt
Co
C
Con
onn
neectio
ion
on to
to
lu
luk
luka
uka Prec
recinc
in
inc
nct
Connectio
Con
Connnec
nec
e tio
tionn to
the to
t wn
VEG
E TA
T ION Existi
Existing
ng
g vegeta
veg
egeta
etatio
et ttio
on
BUF
FER
Sh
Shu
S hu
huttl
uttl
tttl
tl e dro
rop
p off/i
off/i
of f n
1:1000
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
65
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Main Intersection
Detail Plan
1:1000
Work with private land owner
to remove gorse
66
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
The experience nodes are largel y based Winegl ass Bay Lookout and Track
around existing experiences. For many of Experience Nodes
these areas the approach is to enhance the
It is expected that the Wineglass Bay lookout
extent of infrastructure in order to provide
and track will continue to be the most
for a high quality visitor experience. For
visited experience node within the Freycinet
experience nodes in Coles Bay, improvements
Peninsula.
are also focussed in benefiting the local
community to maintain community values The image of Wineglass Bay from the
and authenticity of the town. lookout or from Mt Amos is now a widel y
distributed iconic image of Tasmania used
Other existing nodes within the National
in tourism marketing worldwide. It is a
Park at Sleepy Bay, Cape Tourville and
‘bucket list’ destination and while potentiall y
Friendl y Beaches are recognised with minor
overtime the rate of visitor number
improvements through to car parking,
growth may slow, it will continue to see a
interpretation or signage.
high proportion of visitors coming to the
Rangers Creek where the existing visitor Freycinet Peninsula.
centre is located will either be used for TPWS
The master plan recognises that the
administrative services or made available for
Wineglass Bay track, and in particular the
private investment opportunity. In the short
lookout, will continue to be the pinnacle
term until the new Visitor Gateway Hub is
of the visitor journey into the Freycinet
constructed Rangers Creek will continue to
Peninsula. A priority initiative is the
be the main interface for visitors entering the
construction of a second lookout platform on
National Park.
the Wineglass Bay trail to reduce crowding
Outside of the National Park, Garnet Avenue and provide a more tranquil experience.
town centre and Iluka Village are recognised
Over time this should be supported by
as experience nodes. At both nodes, upgrades
the completion of the one-way track loop
to existing public spaces will enhance the
to the lookout and back with additional
local and visitor experience.
interpretation at the trailhead and lookout.
Two new experience nodes are proposed at The trailhead is also considered to be a
Honeymoon Bay within the Freycinet National suitable location to undertake discovery
Park and at Moulting Lagoon along the activities or have an onsite ranger or visitor
entrance corridor. service staff particularl y during peak
periods. This is to provide information about
Concept plans have been developed for expectations and appropriate behaviour,
the existing experience nodes at the safety guidance as well as live interpretation.
Wineglass Bay trailhead, Garnet Avenue
and Iluka Village Centre, where significant Concept plans for the Wineglass Bay
improvements are identified in the master trailhead are shown over page.
plan. Concepts plans have also been
developed for the new experience node at
Honeymoon Bay.
67
Walk trail to angled car park
Coach access
Proposed PWS
shared trail (notional
shown only)
Coach drop off & parking
Wineglass Bay
trackhead
Wineglass
Bay walk
Walking connection
to to aqua taxi Wineglass Bay Trailhead
(notional shown only) Context Plan
1:2000@A4
Revegetation once
Investigate strategy to STP is in place
mitigate informal car park on
Parsons Lane
Pedestrian collection
Wineglass Bay
trackhead
Toilet
Wineglass
Bay walk
Walking connection
to to aqua taxi
(notional shown only)
Wineglass Bay Trailhead
Detail Plan
1:1000@A4
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Town Centre
Context Plan
1:2000@A4
Retain boat parking
New shared trail connection to
along street edge
new Visitor Gateway Hub
*
Concept plans show recommended changes
are shown opposite
Town Centre
Investigate safe road Precinct
crossing locations
Investigate jetty
extension, for boat
Existing foreshore holding
track
To tourist boat
precinct
70
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
*
Town Centre
Shuttle bus stop Detail Plan
1:1000@A4
Investigate intersection
narrowing/ traffic calming
and safe crossing locations
J ett y R o a d
Investigate Jetty
Formalise road edge and extension, for boat
Investigate little holding
seating area, bicycle
picnic area
racks, revegetate
embankment
71
Shared trail to new
Visitor Centre
Muirs Beach
*
Shuttle bus stop
de
ana
E s pl
Formalise with boardwalk to
Increasing the existing
beach for erosion mitigation
vegetation
Investigate streetscape
beautification/ traffic calming
Upgrade toilet
Iluka Village
Esplanade walk
Formalise road edge, parallel car
parking, bicycle racks
and footpath
1:2000@A4
Swanwick / Coles Bay
walking trail
Muirs Beach
Coastal parkland/
playground upgrade
Iluka Village
73
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Honeymoon Bay
Context Plan The Lodge
1:2000@A4
Retain existing car park. Formalise
spaces. Retain and clearly define
Viewing location existing camping areas.
Honeymoon Bay
Shuttle
node
Rehabilitate track and To Cape Tourville
allow for seating/ viewing
node
To Coles
Shuttle Bay
node
Signage
Signage
Signage
Notes:
All tracks shown conceptual only and sub-
ject to locating and designing on site
74
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
75
The Lodge
Trackhead -
Honeymoon Bay Parking for 2-3 cars
short loop walk for PWS
Shuttle node
Notes:
All tracks shown conceptual only and
subject to locating and designing on site
Honeymoon Bay
Detail Plan
1:1000@A4
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
77
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
78
Boat trailer parking Coles Bay Community
Health Centre
Shared trail to
boat ramp
New visitor
centre
No boat parking
either side of road
(typical)
Investigate new primary
boat trailer parking area
adjacent community
centre
1 Town centre
Limited boat trailer boat ramp
parking
1:5000@A4
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
80
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
81
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
82
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Provision of information about the Freycinet The interpretation and wayfinding strategy
Peninsula, the avoidance of peak times, the will also be a key management tool for visitor
breadth of experiences and how they can navigation through the Freycinet Peninsula.
be packaged together needs to be easil y Clear contemporary signage systems with
accessible to visitors in planning their trip. a high-quality design approach that is
harmonious with the strategy for the Great
Tasmania has a range of printed and digital Eastern Drive, will deliver a safe and seamless
material for visitors. The Great Eastern visitor journey and enhance the quality of the
Drive strategy is an enormousl y successful experience.
example of a combined marketing and
information strategy that is visitor centric.
It provides visitors with their needs through
the trip cycle from initial engagement in trip
planning through to sharing memories at the
end.
This will not onl y let visitors know that there
is much more than just the Wineglass Bay
lookout and track to experience, but also the
best times to arrive during the day and what
time they should be leaving their departure
point. The ditigal strategy is also essential to
market the quality of the experience outside
of peak season.
The marketing and digital strategy for the
Freycinet Peninsula will be compatible with
the East Coast Tasmania and Great Eastern
Drive strategy.
83
Investigate potential future
accommodation opportunity
while retainign walking track
connection to Swanwick
Saffire
1:10000@A4
Attenuation zone
(700 m)
700 m
3.5 ha
Swerage treatment
area
(200 x 200 m)
Potential future
accommodation Potential accommodation New Visitor Centre
growth area parking area
Coles Bay
1:25000
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Following the completion of the Office of the To support the key initiatives commercial
Coordinator General study on affordable activities for day-based experiences within
accommodation demand and suppl y, the national park south of the Hazards will
undertake a site identification process for remain at current levels. This will maintain
suitable land on the Freycinet Peninsula. Land the sense of wildness for visitors who choose
adjacent to the Visitor Gateway Hub and to venture beyond the primary day use area
west of Edge of the Bay resort, has potential as well as limit environmental impacts on the
for residential or visitor accommodation, National Park.
without impacting upon the delivery of
the master plan including maintaining an
attenuation area around the new sewerage
treatment plant.
85
This p age is intentionall y bl ank
Chapter 06
Implementation
88
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
In terms of estimating the impact on visitor As is evident in the table below the
spending of the proposed Visitor Centre, two difference in visitor spending between the
scenarios have been developed: two scenarios in ten years (i.e. by 2027) is
significant, estimated to be around $20.2
• Scenario 1, in which visitor spending
million.
is assumed to increase by 5.5 per cent
per annum over the next ten years (to As with any economic anal ysis of this kind,
2027) in line with the average increase in the results are based on modelling informed
visitation to the area over the period 2011 by a number of assumptions. Should the
to 2017. assumptions vary, the results will change.
For example, there is no allowance as to
• Scenario 2, in which visitor spending is
whether, even with additional car parking
assumed to increase by 1.5 per cent per
capacity, the Wineglass Bay walking track
annum as visitor growth is constrained
can accommodate growth at around 5.5per
due to difficulties with parking and
cent per annum.
therefore access to the Freycinet National
Park’s most sought-after attractions An increase in visitor spending of
(specificall y, the Wineglass Bay walking $20.2 million per annum would support
trail). approximatel y 100 jobs in the services sector
(based on 1 job allocated for every $200,000
Scenario 1 is a proxy for the provision of the
of induced spending). Supporting jobs in
proposed initiatives, in particular the Visitor
the Coles Bay area and broader region
Gateway Hub and projects associated with
associated with retail, accommodation, trade
improving the efficiencies of parking and
supplies, cafes and restaurants and so on.
access to the Wineglass Bay trailhead.
Scenario 2 effectivel y represents a business-
as-usual approach.
Table 1: Visitor spend and imp act of proposed Freycinet Peninsul a Master Pl an initiatives
Nights 2
Total Spend at 2027 based on 5.5% annual growth $36,122,650 $26,904,700 $63,027,350
Total Spend at 2027 based on 1.5% annual growth $24,537,900 $18,282,380 $42,820,280
89
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
90
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Delivery Model for Visitor Gateway Business Model for Visitor Centre
Hub
The appropriate business model for
It is envisaged the Visitor Gateway Hub the visitor centre will require further
would become the central tourism hub for the consideration and anal ysis as to what
Freycinet Peninsula area, and could include: achieves the best balance between the
visitor experience and ensuring that the built
• ticketing and visitor information;
infrastructure is an effective and sustainable
• transport (including National Park operation.
entrance information) management
In broad terms there are two options that
and operation (in the event bus shuttle
can be considered:
services are in place);
• A visitor information centre with separate
• car parking;
booking facilities and information
• separate tenancies for small scale food services for TPWS and other tour
and retail activities; operators. This would require an internal
arrangement where there are effectivel y
• potential tenancies for independent separate tenancies for TPWS and the
tourism operators; and private tour operators; or
• TPWS management and operations for • A visitor information centre with a single
the area. interface point for visitors operated by
a single entity and providing booking
The investment structure for such a
facilities and information services across
facility is potentiall y flexible, though it is
all experiences within the Freycinet
considered likel y the facility would need to
Peninsula. This option is likel y to best
be at least partiall y government funded.
achieve the master plan principles.
In the event the hub was funded by the
Tasmanian Government, it is anticipated In both options, the retail component could
that the tenancies, including the visitor be either operated by TPWS or by another
information centre component, would have operator from a functional perspective. It
the capacity to derive an income for the is noted that should TPWS presence at the
Tasmanian Government under a head-lease new Visitor Gateway Hub be minimal, the
arrangement. physical presence and visibility of rangers
within the National Park, particularl y through
In addition, the potential for private
the Discover Ranger Program, becomes more
investment opportunities at either Rangers
important to achieving the desired visitor
Creek Visitor Centre (once vacated by TPWS)
experience.
or on land adjacent to the Visitor Gateway
Hub may assist in supporting the financial
viability of the delivery model of the Visitor
Gateway Hub.
91
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
92
Category Proposed Indicative Construction Details Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 By Year Business Owner Identified Planning & Environmental
Initiative 10 Requirements
KEY INITIATIVES
Visitor Gateway Visitor Gateway Construction of new integrated visitor State Government Requires an authority granted under National
Hub Hub centre for PWS & private tour operators (including TPWS), P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
with retail/cafe/bar/gallery with new Council & Private (Reserve Activity Assessment).
access roads, car park, landscaping, Sector
Requires planning permit issued under Land
pedestrian connections to Freycinet Drive,
Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
RV dump point, new walking track to top of
hill above Bradley Drive, internal signage May require permit under Threatened Species
and other civil works. Overflow parking Protection Act 1995 dependent on final siting,
to be constructed following review of design and on site ecological assessment.
numbers and operation by year seven.
Pedestrian Footpath 1.2 to 1.5 metres wide from visitor Council Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
Connections hub to boat operator hub and town centre. permit and other regulatory approval.
Approximatel y 650m. Concrete finish.
Footpath 1.2m wide from visitor hub Council Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
to Iluka Village and town centre. permit and other regulatory approval.
Approximatel y 300m. Concrete finish
Foreshore walkway from boat operator hub Community, Council Requires an authority granted under National
to Iluka village centre with linkage through & TPWS P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
to Garnet Avenue using existing walking (Reserve Activity Assessment).
path. Part gravel (200m) part boardwalk
Requires planning permit issued under Land
(800m) 1.5 metres wide. Occasional
Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
seating.
Planning by the community has
commenced.
Shared use trail 5.1 km shared use path from Visitor Stage 1 Stage 2 TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
Gateway Hub to Wineglass Bay trailhead. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
New trail around visitor hub, upgrade of (Reserve Activity Assessment).
existing walking track along roadway
Requires planning permit issued under Land
from intersection with Freycinet Drive
Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
through to Rangers Creek with new trail
from Rangers Creek to trailhead. Gravel
construction but requires minimum width
of 2.4 metres from Ranger's Creek. From
Visitor Hub to Rangers Creek cycleway
will be constructed adjoining Freycinet
Drive. Stage with first 4.1km from existing
visitor centre constructed in Year two and
remaining 1 km connection done to align
with completion of new hub.
Planning by TPWS has commenced.
Infrastructure to Shuttle bus stops with small paved areas, Council Stage 2 Council Requires an authority granted under National
support shuttle seating, signage, interpretation and P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
bus system potential architectural designed shelters. (Reserve Activity Assessment).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
permit.
93
Category Proposed Indicative Construction Details Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 By Year Business Owner Identified Planning & Environmental
Initiative 10 Requirements
Entrance Peninsula Removal of information bay, revegetation State Growth May require planning permit issued under
Corridor Entrance and new entrance signage Land Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993
dependent upon final design.
No other regulatory approvals required.
Corridor New entrance sign at Tasman Hwy Project planning: May require planning permit issued under
Signage intersection, signage at entrance to Governance Land Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993
experience nodes & visitor gateway hub Committee. dependent upon final design.
Implementation:
State Growth.
Coles Bay Iluka Village Upgrade of playground and BBQ Council Requires an authority granted under National
Upgrades Upgrades facilities. Includes 3 BBQ shelters, general P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
landscaping and design improvements to (Reserve Activity Assessment).
toilets.
Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
permit.
Garnet Ave Kerb extension around corner of 1 Garnet Council Requires an authority granted under National
Upgrades Avenue, formalise turning circle with P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
landscaping and increased designation of (Reserve Activity Assessment).
on street parking through line marking and
Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
new signage.
permit.
Public Boat Extension to floating pontoon (8 to 10 Council & MAST Requires planning permit issued under Land
ramp metres) on northern side of boat ramp to Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
allow for additional boat standing during
trailer parking.
Replacement New toilets - built into embankment with Council Requires an authority granted under National
of boat ramp viewing platform on top - occurs once P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
toilets reticulated system implemented. (Reserve Activity Assessment).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring planning
permit.
Township New signage around pedestrian Council May require planning permit issued under
Signage connections, town centre, village centre Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993
with coordinated signage regime. dependent upon final design.
Boat Transport Breakwater Extension of approximatel y 40 metres to State Government Requires an authority granted under National
System Jetty accommodate additional boat operators. & Private Sector P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
Assumes similar construction to existing (boat operators) (Reserve Activity Assessment).
(sea wall with reclamation and concrete
Requires planning permit issued under Land
wharf apron)
Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
Old Quarry New jetty at old quarry west of The State Government Requires an authority granted under National
Jetty Fisheries, approximatel y 45 metre length (including TPWS) P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
and concrete pile construction with timber & Private Sector (Reserve Activity Assessment).
platform with connection to existing (boat operators)
Requires planning permit issued under Land
Hazards track of approximatel y 130 metres.
Use Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993.
Wineglass Bay Additional Additional lookout of approximatel y 40m2 TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
Trail lookout located west of the existing lookout. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
Requires track extension of approximatel y (Reserve Activity Assessment).
15 metres.
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
Completion of Approximatel y 230 metres of additional TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
one way loop track. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
(Reserve Activity Assessment).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
94
Category Proposed Indicative Construction Details Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 By Year Business Owner Identified Planning & Environmental
Initiative 10 Requirements
Wineglass Bay New toilet system for 1 WC at northern end TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
Toilets of Isthmus. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
(Reserve Activity Assessment).
Planning by TPWS has already commenced
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
Additional Formalised additional interpretation TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
Interpretation around trailhead, lookout and along trail. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
(Reserve Activity Assessment).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
Honeymoon Bay New short walk New short walk experience from existing TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
Node experience car park through to Dove Creek. Two way P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
track. Convert existing duplicate car park (Reserve Activity Assessment).
areas into resting spots with revegetation
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
of tracks and cleared areas not required.
permit.
New picnic spot at Dove Creek beach.
Assumes approximatel y 400 metres of
track at T1 standard should include beach
access, seating and interpretation
Whitewater Wall Campground Formalisation of camping spaces with TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
upgrade designated spaces for small and large P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
groups (in conjunction with booking (Reserve Activity Assessment).
system).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
Toilet upgrade Replacement with upgraded system TPWS Requires an authority granted under National
P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
(Reserve Activity Assessment).
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
permit.
Bike Trail Loop Coles Bay to New 23 to 25km loop starting and ending TPWS, State Requires an authority granted under National
Moulting Lagoon at visitor hub and connecting through to Growth & Council P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
and Friendl y Swanwick, along edge of Moulting Lagoon (Reserve Activity Assessment).
Beaches Loop through to Friendl y Beaches and then Blue
Potentiall y exempt from requiring a planning
Stone Bay. Utilises mix of existing fire
permit.
trails, on road connections with new gravel
or boardwalk paths. Would require rest/ May require permit under Threatened Species
stops and signage Protection Act 1995 and Environmental
Protection and Biodiversity Conser vation Act
2002.
Sewerage Stage One Pump Station & Rising main from Trail TPWS, Council and Requires an authority granted under National
Treatment Head to existing STP. Taswater P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
System (Reserve Activity Assessment).
Exempt from requiring a planning permit due
to Water and Sewerage Industry (Generation)
Regul ations 2009 if undertaken by Taswater
otherwise onl y potentiall y exempt.
Stage Two Connection of campsite facilities to the Requires an authority granted under National
new installed rising main connection. P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
(Reserve Activity Assessment).
Exempt from requiring a planning permit due
to Water and Sewerage Industry (Generation)
Regul ations 2009 if undertaken by Taswater
otherwise onl y potentiall y exempt.
95
Category Proposed Indicative Construction Details Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 By Year Business Owner Identified Planning & Environmental
Initiative 10 Requirements
Stage Three New initiall y sized STP & lagoon, pump Requires an authority granted under National
station & rising main from ex. ponds, P arks and Reser ves Management Act 2002
connection of The Lodge rising main (Reserve Activity Assessment).
discharge to the new pump station,
Requires permit issued under Land Use
connection of new Visitor centre to newl y
Pl anning and Approvals Act 1993 and the
installed rising main.
Environm ental Management and Pollution
Control Act 1995 (Level 2 activity)
Stage Four Reticulation connection of Coles Bay Exempt from requiring a planning permit due
commercial precinct, new pump station to to Water and Sewerage Industry (Generation)
the newl y installed rising main. Regul ations 2009 if undertaken by Taswater
otherwise onl y potentiall y exempt.
No other regulatory approvals required.
Stage Five The Fisheries and remaining Coles Bay Exempt from requiring a planning permit due
residential areas connected to new pump to Water and Sewerage Industry (Generation)
stations and rising mains. Regul ations 2009 if undertaken by Taswater
otherwise onl y potentiall y exempt.
No other regulatory approvals required.
SUPPORTING INITIATIVES
Marketing & Digital Strategy N/A East Coast N/A
Tasmania
Interpretation & Wayfinding N/A Governance N/A
Strategy Committee
Discovery Ranger Program N/A Ongoing TPWS/private tour N/A
operators
Improved Coordination & N/A Ongoing Governance N/A
facilitation with local tour Committee
operators.
Accommodation Strategy N/A Governance N/A
Committee
Study of Impacts of Cruise Ships & N/A TPWS N/A
Helicopters
Commercial Activities in the N/A Ongoing TPWS N/A
National Park
Note: potential exemption from requiring a pl anning permit is dependent upon the pl anning schem e in effect
at the tim e. The Gl amorgan Spring Bay Interim Pl anning Scheme 2015 has general exemptions for maintenance
and rep air of minor infrastructure under taken by an authority such as footp aths, cycle p aths, shel ters, seating
and simil ar. For the provision of new minor infrastructure the exemption onl y applies in cer tain circumstances.
There is also no current exemption for the provision of public toilets. The Tasmanian Pl anning Schem e has an
exemption for the provision as well as maintenance and modification of minor infrastructure. This also includes
provision of public toilets.
96
Appendix A
Consultation Report
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
98
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
*Responses shown are those that totalled 4 or more mentions across the workshops and written
submissions
99
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Table 2: Top responses relating to ‘What don’t you want to see at Freycinet?’*
*Responses shown are those that totalled 4 or more mentions across the workshops and written
submissions
100
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
101
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Table 4: Top responses to ‘What do you want to see improved? Do you have any ideas for the future?*
102
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Key themes and suggestions Facilities and ser vices and maintenance
The community workshops and written • Improve facilities and services for visitors
submissions were also important in raising and residents particularl y at peak times
a range of suggestions for ways to address (including overflow parking).
the issues identified through the questions • Improve footpaths and gutters.
above. These ideas have been arranged
thematicall y below: • Improve the number and location of
ecofriendl y public toilets in the National
Visitor Centre and the National P ark Park and township (particularl y at the
• Introduce a shuttle bus service to the Lookout, Wineglass Bay, entrance to park,
National Park. the circuit track and the township).
• Shuttle buses could have multiple pick • Relocate the existing public toilet on the
up/drop off points (including in the foreshore facing the Hazards to a less
township). visuall y prominent location.
103
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Managing visitor imp acts Pedestrian and cyclist access and safety
• Upgrade existing walking tracks and • Develop a shared path suitable for
increase the number of alternative bicycles, pedestrians and wheelchairs
walking tracks to take pressure off around the foreshore from Coles Bay to
existing walks. Wineglass Car Park.
• Develop activities and walks other than • Improve footpaths, road crossings and
Wineglass Bay (e.g. walks to areas such pedestrian safety in Coles Bay township,
as Freshwater Lagoon or Bluestone Bay particularl y around the Esplanade and
or enhance existing fire trails around the Iluka caravan park.
Coles Bay to provide nature walks with
• Look at introducing Freycinet themed
appropriate signage).
bollards around key areas to protect
• More activel y manage visitor numbers pedestrians.
and flow (e.g. active, spatial and temporal
• Introduce a town bike system (with a
management during the day and
fee), possibl y with electric bikes.
seasonall y) to avoid too many visitors to
the park during the peak period of 10am • Introduce a walking track to Richardson
to 3pm. Beach from Freycinet Drive.
• Look at restricting visitor numbers in • Develop walking tracks from the Bradley
peak periods to minimise impacts on the Drive area to the entrance of the park for
environment and amenity of area. tourists and residents.
• Explore limits on visitor numbers to the • Support Freycinet as a mountain biking
park including introducing a possible destination but provide more designated
lottery system. trails to avoid damage.
• Identify the carrying capacity of walks to
address overcrowding.
Traffic Managem ent and Strategy
• Raise park fees or increase visitors-pays
• Improve road surfaces (e.g. possibl y seal
approaches (e.g. charge per person
Friendl y Beaches road).
rather than per car).
• Improve traffic management and speeds.
• Encourage people to stay longer than
one night. • Widen roads to improve safety, where
appropriate.
• Create tourism experiences that slow
down the visitor experience, create a day • Consider limiting the size of buses and
visitor loop and avoid “mass tourism”. motor homes allowed on road into the
Amend government marketing strategies National Park.
to incorporate these ideas. • Introduce traffic calming devices in the
• Encourage more use of small Wineglass township particularl y on Freycinet Drive.
Bay tourist boats (which may alleviate • Introduce measures to stop ad hoc
the impact on the Wineglass Bay walking carparking (particularl y on the sides of
track) are often overlooked due to roads) which is a growing safety issue.
expense, timing or weather.
• Redesign and improve signposting for the
• Promote other activities in the area (e.g. road junction to the Fisheries to improve
cycling). safety.
• Introduce a walking track from the
Visitors Centre to key walking tracks to
ease traffic congestion.
• Explore whether there are other national
parks that visitors could be encouraged
to visit to limit impacts on Freycinet.
104
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
105
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Environmental protection
• Protect the marine environment values
of the Park and look at creating a
marine reserve ‘no take zone’ around the
boundary of the National Park.
• Increase the focus on the marine
environment and provide further
information and interpretation about the
marine environment.
• Ensure the environmental values of the
area are put before other interests.
• Introduce a scenic parking bay for bird
watching at Moulting Lagoon and bird
hide viewing platform (similar to the
Tamar Valley)
106
Freycinet Peninsula Master Plan (Draft)
Conclusion
The community engagement process
highlighted a number of consistent themes.
There was a consensus that the Park was
being used to such a degree that it was
impacting upon the visitor experiences, and
having environmental impacts on the natural
values as well.
There was also a sense that the values that
many people consider most highl y, are being
eroded by changed visitor behaviour, and the
introduction of activities that in some cases
are considered damaging.
There were many opportunities and
suggestions for solutions that came out
through the engagement and discussions.
Some of these highlighted the community’s
experience with projects of this nature many
years previousl y, with the suggestions of a
new visitor hub being raised very earl y in the
process. These included:
• Constructing a visitor hub outside of
the National Park that can both assist
in managing the movement of visitors,
but also in providing better facilities for
vehicle parking, for the dissemination of
information, and to introduce a shuttle
bus service; and
• A reticulated sewerage system needs
to be implemented that addresses the
treatment of sewage at a Peninsula wide
level.
107