Chirai Anjar Rigid Pavement Design As Per IRC 58 2011

Single Axle Tandem Axle Tridem Axle
Axle Load % of Single Axle Load % of Tandem Axle Load % of Tridem

Class, KN Axles Class, KN Axles Class, KN Axles
185-195 0.00% 380-400 0.00% 530-560 0.00%
175-185 0.00% 360-380 0.00% 500-530 0.00%
165-175 0.00% 340-360 0.00% 470-500 0.00%
155-165 1.30% 320-340 0.00% 440-470 0.00%
145-155 1.30% 300-320 0.00% 410-440 0.00%
135-145 5% 280-300 7.04% 380-410 0.00%
125-135 9% 260-280 8.45% 350-380 0.00%
115-125 10% 240-260 16.90% 320-350 0.00%
105-115 13% 220-240 19.72% 290-320 45.00%
95-105 13% 200-220 8.45% 260-290 10.00%
85-95 10% 180-200 12.68% 230-260 15.00%
<85 3636% <180 26.76% <260 30.00%
100 100 100
Rigid Pavement Design
IRC: 58: 2011
Input Data
Design Life = 30
Subgrade CBR = 10
Thickness of DLC = 150
Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k = 300
Tyre Pressure, p = 0.8
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, E = 30000
Poisson's ratio, m = 0.15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete, a = 0.00001
Temperature Differential for BUC, Dtbuc= 14.3
Temperature Differential for TDC, Dttdc = 12.15
Load Safety Factor, LSF = 1.2
28 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete = 4.5
4.95
90 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete =
Spacing of Contraction Joint, L = 4.5
Spacing between Longitudinal Joint and edge of Pavement, B =

3.5
Assumed Thickness, h = 0.23
Design Traffic
Two Direction Single Direction

Cumulative Repetitions = 110000000.0 55000000
Design Traffic = 27500000 13750000
Avg. number of axles per commercial vehicle = 2.35

Total Design Traffic = 64625000 (24 hrs traffic)
Day time Design Traffic (12hrs) = 25850000 Assume 40%
Night time Design Traffic (12 hrs)= 38775000 Assume 60%
Day time 6 Hour design traffic = 12925000

Therefore, Design Traffic for BUC = 12925000
Night time 6 Hour design traffic = 19387500
Design Traffic for TDC = 10663125
Radius of relative stiffness ,l= 0.57
Table 4 k-Values for Dry Lean Concrete Subbase (IRC: 58-2011)

Soaked CBR(%) 2 3 5 7
k-value of Subgrade(Mpa/m) 21 28 42 48
Effective k for 100mm DLC,
56 97 166 208
(Mpa/m)
97 138 208 277
(Mpa/m)
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for BUC
Rear Single Axle
Expected Flexural Allowable
Load, KN
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Stress Ratio, SR Repititions, Ni
190 0 3.106 0.63 14378
180 0 2.987 0.60 28173
170 0 2.867 0.58 55205
160 25204 2.747 0.55 108175
150 25179 2.627 0.53 223203.29
140 100714 2.508 0.51 561920.71
130 176250 2.388 0.48 2044574.96
120 201429 2.268 0.46 17849542.50
110 251786 2.148 0.43 0.00
100 251786 2.029 0.41 0.00
90 201429 1.909 0.39 0.00
80 70500000 1.789 0.36 0.00
Rear tandem Axle
Load, KN Stress Ratio, SR
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Repititions, Ni
390 0 2.669 0.54 170829.893394868
370 0 2.561 0.52 360631.423909449
350 0 2.453 0.50 951602.591609719
330 0 2.345 0.47 3806048.75716331
310 0 2.237 0.45 44362418.4226951
290 227553 2.129 0.43 0
270 273063 2.021 0.41 0
250 546127 1.913 0.39 0
230 637148 1.806 0.36 0
210 273063 1.698 0.34 0
190 409595 1.590 0.32 0
170 864701 1.482 0.30 0
Cumulative Fatigue Damage =

yrs
%
mm
Mpa/m
Mpa
Mpa
/ OC
O
C
O
C
Mpa
Mpa
m
m
10 15
55 62
278 389(300)
412(300) 300
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0.2329911582
0.1128055568
0.1792322017
0.0862037359
0.011284803
0
0
0
0 0.623
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
0
0
0
0
0
0 #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for TDC
Rear Single Axle
Expected Flexural Allowable Repititions,
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Ni
190 0 2.759 0.56 101146
180 0 2.677 0.54 162672
170 0 2.595 0.52 280387
160 20793 2.512 0.51 539046
150 20772 2.430 0.49 1221339.83
140 83089 2.348 0.47 3645311.78
130 145406 2.266 0.46 19079907.28
120 166179 2.183 0.44 0.00
110 207723 2.101 0.42 0.00
100 207723 2.019 0.41 0.00
90 166179 1.937 0.39 0.00
80 58162500 1.854 0.37 0.00
Rear tandem Axle (Stress computed for 50% of Axle Load)
390 0 2.800 0.57 80281.0811058818
370 0 2.718 0.55 127757.907455402
350 0 2.636 0.53 211162.345536064
330 0 2.553 0.52 382477.914279062
310 0 2.471 0.50 790947.096375097
290 187731 2.389 0.48 2016111.68476315
225277 2.307
270 0.47 7518365.19549897
250 450555 2.224 0.45 0
230 525647 2.142 0.43 0
225277 2.060
210 0.42 0
190 337916 1.978 0.40 0
170 713378 1.895 0.38 0
545 0 2.676 0.54 163901.3932637
515 0 2.594 0.52 281218.84630656
485 0 2.513 0.51 537100.333371561
455 0 2.431 0.49 1204467.80066837
425 0 2.350 0.47 3529426.30531572
395 0 2.268 0.46 17708865.4906127
365 0 2.187 0.44 1.000000000000E+200
0 2.106
335 0.43 1.000000000000E+200
719761 2.024
305 0.41 1.000000000000E+200
159947 1.943
275 0.39 1.000000000000E+200
245 239920 1.861 0.38 1.000000000000E+200
215 479841 1.780 0.36 1.000000000000E+200
Cumulative Fatigue D
Fatigue Damage,ni/Ni
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0386
0.0170
0.0228
0.0076
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 #DIV/0!
ad)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0931
0.0300
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0 #DIV/0!
ad)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.0000
Cumulative Fatigue Damage= #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Design of Dowel Bars
Code used : IRC : 58-2011.
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Joint width, z =
(20mm for Expansion Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
Moodulus of subgrade reaction, k =
Radius of relative stiffness,(l)=
E for Dowel Bar =
Modulus of Dowel support, K
Maximum Single Axle load =
Maximum Single Wheel Load =

(Considering dual wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
Wheel load to be considered for dowel bar design
Safety of the dowel bar can be examined for a load of
Assume the percentage of load transfer through dowel bar as
Characteristic compressive strength of concrete, f ck=
Diameter of the dowel bar assumed, b
Permissible bearing stress in concrete,F
Spacing between the dowel bars=
First dowel bar is placed from the pavement edge at a distance =
Length of the dowel bar =
Dowel bars up to a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfe
Number of dowel bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab=
l/Spacing
Assuming the load transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be
load transferred by dowel bar system=
Load carried by the outer dowel bar,Pt=
Check for Bearing Stress

Moment of inertia of dowel, πb4/64
Relative stiffness of dowel bar embedded in concrete,
Bearing stress in dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)
Hence , the dowel bar spacing and diameter assumed are safe
Design of Tie Bars
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Lane Width, b =
Coefficient of Friction, f =
Density of concrete KN/m3
Allowable tensile stress in plain bars

(As per IRC:15-2011)
Allowable tensile stress in deformed bars
Allowable Bond Stress in plain tie Bars
Allowable Bond Stress in deformed tie bars
Design of Plain bars

Select diameter of tie bar, dt
Area of plain steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Cross Sectional area of tie bar, A = πd2/4
Perimeter of tie Bar, Pptb = πd
Spacing of tie bars, A/As =

(Pro
Length of tie bar, L= 2xSstxA / BxP
Increasing length by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
Therefore, the required length of tie bar
Design of Deformed bars

Area of deformed steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st

(Pro

ers
h=
n Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
grade reaction, k =
e stiffness,(l)=
el support, Kmds =
Axle load =
Wheel Load =
l wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
considered for dowel bar design
wel bar can be examined for a load of
entage of load transfer through dowel bar as
mpressive strength of concrete, f ck=
dowel bar assumed, bd=
ng stress in concrete,Fb=((10.16-b)fck/9.525)x100
n the dowel bars=
s placed from the pavement edge at a distance =
a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfer
l bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab= 1+
ad transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be zero, the total
by dowel bar system=
he outer dowel bar,Pt=
ng Stress
a of dowel, πb4/64
of dowel bar embedded in concrete,β=4√kmdsb/4EI
dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)
el bar spacing and diameter assumed are safe

Design of Tie Bars
ers
h=
e stress in plain bars
e stress in deformed bars
Stress in plain tie Bars
Stress in deformed tie bars
el bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
rea of tie bar, A = πd2/4
Bar, Pptb = πd
(Provide a spacing of
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
by 100mm for loss of bond due to painting and another 50mm for tolerance in placement.
quired length of tie bar
med bars
d steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt

0.23 m
20 mm
300 MPa/m
0.57 567.5071975988
200000 MPa
415000 MPa/m
160 kN
80 kN
56 kN
80 kN (Say)
40 %
48 MPa (for M40 grade)
32 mm (assumed)
35.1 MPa
200 mm (assumed)
150 mm
500 mm (assumed)
4 dowels
1.89 Pt
16.93 kN
51471.85 mm4
0.024
31.22 Mpa which is < 32.1

0.23 m
3.5 m
1.5
24 KN/m3
125 MPa
200 MPa
1.75 MPa
2.46 MPa
12 mm
231.84 mm2/m
113.10 mm2
37.70 mm
487.82 mm
488.00 mm c/c
428.57 mm
578.57 mm
579.00 mm (say)
12 mm
144.90 mm2/m
780.52 mm
781.00 mm c/c)
487.80 mm
637.80 mm
638.00 mm (say)
IRC: 58: 2011
Input Data
Design Life = 30
Subgrade CBR = 10
Thickness of DLC = 150
Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k = 300
Tyre Pressure, p = 0.8
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, E = 30000
Poisson's ratio, m = 0.15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete, a = 0.00001
Temperature Differential for BUC, Dtbuc= 14.3
Temperature Differential for TDC, Dttdc = 12.15
28 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete = 4.5
4.95
90 - day Flexural Strength of Concrete =
Spacing of Contraction Joint, L = 4.5

3.5
Assumed Thickness, h = 0.25
Design Traffic
Two Direction Single Direction

Cumulative Repetitions = 110000000.0 55000000
Design Traffic = 27500000 13750000
Avg. number of axles per commercial vehicle = 2.35

Total Design Traffic = 64625000 (24 hrs traffic)
Day time Design Traffic (12hrs) = 25850000 Assume 40%
Night time Design Traffic (12 hrs)= 38775000 Assume 60%
Day time 6 Hour design traffic = 12925000

Therefore, Design Traffic for BUC = 12925000
Night time 6 Hour design traffic = 19387500
Design Traffic for TDC = 10663125
Radius of relative stiffness ,l= 0.60
Table 4 k-Values for Dry Lean Concrete Subbase (IRC: 58-2011)

Soaked CBR(%) 2 3 5 7
k-value of Subgrade(Mpa/m) 21 28 42 48
56 97 166 208
(Mpa/m)
97 138 208 277
(Mpa/m)
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for BUC
Rear Single Axle
Load, KN
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Stress Ratio, SR Repititions, Ni
190 0 2.759 0.61 21515
180 0 2.657 0.59 40248
170 0 2.556 0.57 75292
160 25204 2.455 0.55 141544
150 25179 2.353 0.52 292693.62
140 100714 2.252 0.50 746019.78
130 176250 2.151 0.48 2781629.50
120 201429 2.049 0.46 26084222.28
110 251786 1.948 0.43 0.00
100 251786 1.847 0.41 0.00
90 201429 1.745 0.39 0.00
80 70500000 1.644 0.37 0.00
Rear tandem Axle
Repitions, ni Stress,Mpa Repititions, Ni
390 0 2.348 0.52 306026.204330205
370 0 2.256 0.50 711244.803884546
350 0 2.165 0.48 2223143.61203445
330 0 2.074 0.46 12984444.4921638
310 0 1.982 0.44 0
290 227553 1.891 0.42 0
270 273063 1.800 0.40 0
250 546127 1.708 0.38 0
230 637148 1.617 0.36 0
210 273063 1.526 0.34 0
190 409595 1.434 0.32 0
170 864701 1.343 0.30 0
Cumulative Fatigue Damage =

yrs
%
mm
Mpa/m
Mpa
Mpa
/ OC
O
C
O
C
Mpa
Mpa
m
m
10 15
55 62
278 389(300)
412(300) 300
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0.1780634979
0.0860236427
0.1350021661
0.0633621408
0.007722238
0
0
0
0 0.470
Fatigue
Damage,ni/Ni
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0.470
Adequate
Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis for TDC
Rear Single Axle
190 0 2.523 0.56 92350
180 0 2.453 0.55 142745
170 0 2.384 0.53 231276
160 20793 2.314 0.51 407471
150 20772 2.245 0.50 808754.08
140 83089 2.175 0.48 1927670.80
130 145406 2.105 0.47 6313975.65
120 166179 2.036 0.45 41441271.82
110 207723 1.966 0.44 0.00
100 207723 1.896 0.42 0.00
90 166179 1.827 0.41 0.00
80 58162500 1.757 0.39 0.00
390 0 2.558 0.57 74476.9634736335
370 0 2.488 0.55 114513.249679972
350 0 2.419 0.54 180086.040167779
330 0 2.349 0.52 303243.462050843
310 0 2.279 0.51 563850.956656165
290 187731 2.210 0.49 1213191.23998706
225277 2.140
270 0.48 3306827.04229354
250 450555 2.070 0.46 14153246.5832734
230 525647 2.001 0.44 0
225277 1.931
210 0.43 0
190 337916 1.862 0.41 0
170 713378 1.792 0.40 0
545 0 2.452 0.54 143709.393498147
515 0 2.383 0.53 231877.870157844
485 0 2.314 0.51 406213.646156378
455 0 2.246 0.50 799569.889555474
425 0 2.177 0.48 1880491.33258304
395 0 2.108 0.47 6007927.57701768
365 0 2.039 0.45 37031132.4416581
0 1.970
335 0.44 1.000000000000E+200
719761 1.901
305 0.42 1.000000000000E+200
159947 1.832
275 0.41 1.000000000000E+200
245 239920 1.763 0.39 1.000000000000E+200
215 479841 1.694 0.38 1.000000000000E+200
Cumulative Fatigue D
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0510
0.0257
0.0431
0.0230
0.0040
#DIV/0!
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 #DIV/0!
ad)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1547
0.0681
0.0318
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0 #DIV/0!
ad)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0.0000
Cumulative Fatigue Damage= #DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Joint width, z =
(20mm for Expansion Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
Moodulus of subgrade reaction, k =
Radius of relative stiffness,(l)=
E for Dowel Bar =
Modulus of Dowel support, K
Maximum Single Axle load =
Maximum Single Wheel Load =

(Considering dual wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
Wheel load to be considered for dowel bar design
Safety of the dowel bar can be examined for a load of
Assume the percentage of load transfer through dowel bar as
Characteristic compressive strength of concrete, f ck=
Diameter of the dowel bar assumed, b
Permissible bearing stress in concrete,F
Spacing between the dowel bars=
First dowel bar is placed from the pavement edge at a distance =
Length of the dowel bar =
Dowel bars up to a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfe
Number of dowel bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab=
l/Spacing
Assuming the load transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be
load transferred by dowel bar system=
Load carried by the outer dowel bar,Pt=

Moment of inertia of dowel, πb4/64
Relative stiffness of dowel bar embedded in concrete,
Bearing stress in dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)
Hence , the dowel bar spacing and diameter assumed are unsafe
Design of Tie Bars
Design Parameters
Slab Thickness, h =
Lane Width, b =
Coefficient of Friction, f =
Density of concrete KN/m3
Allowable tensile stress in plain bars

Allowable tensile stress in deformed bars
Allowable Bond Stress in plain tie Bars
Allowable Bond Stress in deformed tie bars
Design of Plain bars

Area of plain steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
Cross Sectional area of tie bar, A = πd2/4
Perimeter of tie Bar, Pptb = πd

(Pro
Design of Deformed bars

Area of deformed steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st

(Pro

ers
h=
n Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)
grade reaction, k =
e stiffness,(l)=
el support, Kmds =
Axle load =
Wheel Load =
l wheel as single Wheel for a safe design)
considered for dowel bar design
wel bar can be examined for a load of
entage of load transfer through dowel bar as
mpressive strength of concrete, f ck=
dowel bar assumed, bd=
ng stress in concrete,Fb=((10.16-b)fck/9.525)x100
n the dowel bars=
s placed from the pavement edge at a distance =
a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stifness (l),from the point of load application are effective in load transfer
l bars participating in load transfer when the wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge of the slab= 1+
ad transferred by the first dowel is P t and that the load on dowel bar at a distance of l from the first dowel to be zero, the total
by dowel bar system=
he outer dowel bar,Pt=
ng Stress
a of dowel, πb4/64
of dowel bar embedded in concrete,β=4√kmdsb/4EI
dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)
el bar spacing and diameter assumed are unsafe

Design of Tie Bars
ers
h=
e stress in plain bars
e stress in deformed bars
Stress in plain tie Bars
Stress in deformed tie bars
el bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
rea of tie bar, A = πd2/4
Bar, Pptb = πd
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt
med bars
d steel bar required per metre width of joint to resist the frictonal force at slab bottom, As=bfW/S st
L= 2xSstxA / BxPtbt

0.23 m
20 mm
300 MPa/m
0.57 567.5071975988
200000 MPa
415000 MPa/m
160 kN
80 kN
56 kN
80 kN (Say)
40 %
40 MPa (for M40 grade)
32 mm (assumed)
29.2 MPa
200 mm (assumed)
150 mm
500 mm (assumed)
4 dowels
1.89 Pt
16.93 kN
51471.85 mm4
0.024
31.22 Mpa which is < 32.1

0.23 m
3.5 m
1.5
24 KN/m3
125 MPa
200 MPa
1.75 MPa
2.46 MPa
12 mm
231.84 mm2/m
113.10 mm2
37.70 mm
487.82 mm
488.00 mm c/c
428.57 mm
578.57 mm
579.00 mm (say)
12 mm
144.90 mm2/m
780.52 mm
781.00 mm c/c)
487.80 mm
637.80 mm
638.00 mm (say)
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
Spur road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Input Data
Design Life = 30 yrs

Subgrade CBR = 10 %
Thickness of DLC = 150 mm
Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k = 30 kg/cm2/cm
Tyre Pressure, p = 8 kg/cm2
Modulus of elasticity of concrete, E = 300000 kg/cm2
Poisson's ratio,  = 0.15
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete,  = 0.00001 / OC
Temperature Differential, t = 14.6 OC
Flexural Strength of Concrete = 45 kg/cm2
Spacing of Contraction Joint, L = 4.5 m

3.5 m
Assumed Thickness, h = 25 cm
Check for Wheel Load Stresses
Axle Load, L Stress due to Wheel Expected

L * 1.2 Stress Ratio Fatigue Life, N
(tonnes) Load, kg/cm2 Repetition,n
Single Axle
22 26.4 0.00 0 Infinity
20 24 0.00 0 Infinity
18 21.6 0.00 0 Infinity
16 19.2 22.900 0.51 275000 485184
14 16.8 20.551 0.46 825000 14335236
12 14.4 18.133 0.40 2750000 Infinity
10 12 15.628 0.35 3300000 Infinity
4.5 5.4 8.073 0.18 6050000 Infinity
Tandem Axle
28 33.6 15.936 0.35 1375000 Infinity
24 28.8 14.172 0.31 4125000 Infinity
20 24 12.324 0.27 2475000 Infinity
16 19.2 10.365 0.23 550000 Infinity
7 8.4 5.4 0.12 2750000 Infinity
Cumulative fatigue life consumed =
Since, the cumulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, the design is safe from fatigue consideration.
A - 86
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Check for Temperature Stresses
Radius of relative stiffness, l = (E * h3/12 * (1 - 2) * k)1/4

= 60.41 cm
L/l= 5.79
Bradbury's Coefficient, C = 0.879
Edge Warping Stress = C * E *  * t / 2

= 19.24 kg/cm2
Total of Temperature Warping Stress and the highest axle load stress
= 22.9 + 19.24
= 42.14 kg/cm2
<45 kg/sq. cm
Hence, the pavement thickness of 25 cm is safe under the combined action of wheel load and temperature
Check for Corner Stress
98th Percentile axle load = 14 tonnes

Wheel Load, P = 7000 kg
C/c distance between two tyres = 31 cm
Radius of area of contact of wheel, a = (0.8521*P/(p* + (S/*(P/(0.5227*p))0.5 )0.5
= 25.32 cm
Therefore, Corner Stress = (3*P/h )*(1 - (a*2 / l)1.2 )
2
= 15.66 kg/cm2
<45 kg/sq. cm, hence, the pavement thickness of 25 cm
assumed is safe
A - 87
Annexure 2.5 (b)
98th Percentile axle load = 14 tonnes

Wheel Load, P = 7000 kg
Concrete Slab Thickness, h = 25 cm
Radius of Relative Thickness, l = 60.41 cm
Characteristic Compressive Strength of Concrete Cube
(15cm) after 28 days, fck = 400.00 kg/cm2 for M-40 grade
Joint Width, z = 2 cm
Assumed diameter of dowel bar, b = 3.2 cm
Assumed Spacing between Dowel Bars = 20 cm
Assumed length of the Dowel Bar = 50 cm
Permissible Bearing Stress in Concrete, Fb =

(10.16 - b)*fck / 9.525
= 292.28 kg/cm2
First dowel bar is placed at a distance = 15 cm from the pavement edge
Dowel bars upto a distance of 1.0 x radius of relative stiffness, from the point of load application are effective in load
transfer.
No. of dowel bars participating in load transfer when

wheel load is just over the dowel bar close to the edge
of slab, n = 1 + Radius of Relative Stiffness/Spacing
= 4 dowels
Assuming that the load transferred by the first dowel is
Pt and assuming that the load on dowel bar
at a distance of l from the first dowel to be
zero, the total load transferred by dowel bar
system = [1 + (l - spacing)/l + (l - 2*spacing)/l +…...
+ (l - (n-1)*spacing)] * Pt
= 2.0137 Pt
Percentage of load transfer = 40 %
Load carried by the outer dowel bar, P t = (7000 x 0.4) /2.0137
= 1390 kg
A - 88
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Modulus of dowel/concrete interaction (dowel support),

ks = 41500 kg/cm2/cm
Modulus of Elasticity of the dowel, Ed = 2.0E+06 kg/cm2
Moment of Inertia of Dowel, Id =  * b4 / 64
= 5.1472 cm4
Relative stiffness of dowel bar embedded in concrete, 
= (ks * b/(4 * Ed * Id))1/4
= 0.2383
Bearing stress in dowel bar = (Pt * ks) * (2 + * z)/(4 * 3 * Ed * Id)
= 256 kg/cm2
<292 kg/sq. cm, hence, the assumed dowel bar spacing of 20

cm and diameter of 3.2 cm are safe
A - 89
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Design of Tie Bars
Design Parameters
Pavement Slab Thickness, h = 25 cm

Lane Width, B = 3.5 m
Coefficient of friction, f = 1.5
Density of Concrete, W = 2400 kg/m3
Allowable tensile stress in bars, f s = 2000 kg/cm2
Allowable bond stress for tie bars, f b = 24.6 kg/cm2
Assumed diameter of tie bars, d = 12 mm
Spacing and Length of Tie Bars
Area of the steel bar per metre width of joint to resist

the frictional force at slab bottom, As = B * f * h * W / f
s
= 1.575 cm2/m
Cross sectional area of tie bar, A = (/4)d 2
= 1.131 cm2
Perimeter of Tie Bar, Ps = d
= 3.7699 cm
Spacing of Tie Bars = A / As
= 71.81 cm
say, 72 cm c/c
Length of Tie Bar, Lt = 2 * fs * A / (fb * Ps)

= 48.78 cm
Increase length of tie bar by 10 cm for loss of bond due to painting and another 5 cm for tolerance in placement.
Therefore, length of tie bar = 48.78 + 10 + 5

= 63.78 cm
say, 64 cm
Provide Tie Bar of length 64 cm and diameter 12 mm at a spacing of 72 cm c/c
A - 90
Annexure 2.5 (b)
d Project Report for Chirai - Anjar Road including Anjar Bypass(SH-50) and its
road(SH-45) in the state of Gujarat
Fatigue Life
Consumed
0.5667957297
0.0575505004
0.624
ing less than 1, the design is safe from fatigue consideration.
A - 91
Annexure 2.5 (b)
safe under the combined action of wheel load and temperature
<45 kg/sq. cm, hence, the pavement thickness of 25 cm

assumed is safe
A - 92
Annexure 2.5 (b)
elative stiffness, from the point of load application are effective in load
[1 + (l - spacing)/l + (l - 2*spacing)/l +…...

+ (l - (n-1)*spacing)] * Pt
A - 93
Annexure 2.5 (b)
<292 kg/sq. cm, hence, the assumed dowel bar spacing of 20

cm and diameter of 3.2 cm are safe
A - 94
Annexure 2.5 (b)
Design of Tie Bars
ond due to painting and another 5 cm for tolerance in placement.
A - 95
65.5
104800

Chirai Anjar Rigid Pavement Design As Per IRC 58 2011

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Chirai Anjar Rigid Pavement Design As Per IRC 58 2011

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Single Axle Tandem Axle Tridem Axle

Axle Load % of Single Axle Load % of Tandem Axle Load % of Tridem

Spacing between Longitudinal Joint and edge of Pavement, B =

Two Direction Single Direction

Avg. number of axles per commercial vehicle = 2.35

Day time 6 Hour design traffic = 12925000

Table 4 k-Values for Dry Lean Concrete Subbase (IRC: 58-2011)

Cumulative Fatigue Damage =

Cumulative Fatigue Damage= #DIV/0!

Moodulus of subgrade reaction, k =

Radius of relative stiffness,(l)=

E for Dowel Bar =

Modulus of Dowel support, K

Maximum Single Axle load =

Maximum Single Wheel Load =

Safety of the dowel bar can be examined for a load of

Assume the percentage of load transfer through dowel bar as

Characteristic compressive strength of concrete, f ck=

Diameter of the dowel bar assumed, b

Permissible bearing stress in concrete,F

Spacing between the dowel bars=

First dowel bar is placed from the pavement edge at a distance =

Length of the dowel bar =

Load carried by the outer dowel bar,Pt=

Check for Bearing Stress

Relative stiffness of dowel bar embedded in concrete,

Bearing stress in dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)

Density of concrete KN/m3

Allowable tensile stress in plain bars

Allowable Bond Stress in deformed tie bars

Design of Plain bars

Cross Sectional area of tie bar, A = πd2/4

Perimeter of tie Bar, Pptb = πd

Spacing of tie bars, A/As =

Therefore, the required length of tie bar

Design of Deformed bars

Spacing of tie bars, A/As =

Therefore, the required length of tie bar

n Joint, 8mm for Contraction Joint)

wel bar can be examined for a load of

entage of load transfer through dowel bar as

mpressive strength of concrete, f ck=

dowel bar assumed, bd=

n the dowel bars=

s placed from the pavement edge at a distance =

he outer dowel bar,Pt=

of dowel bar embedded in concrete,β=4√kmdsb/4EI

dowel bar, (Pt x k) x (2+ßz)/(4ß3EI)

el bar spacing and diameter assumed are safe

e stress in plain bars

e stress in deformed bars

Stress in plain tie Bars

Stress in deformed tie bars

rea of tie bar, A = πd2/4

quired length of tie bar

quired length of tie bar

48 MPa (for M40 grade)

31.22 Mpa which is < 32.1

Spacing between Longitudinal Joint and edge of Pavement, B =

Two Direction Single Direction

Avg. number of axles per commercial vehicle = 2.35

Day time 6 Hour design traffic = 12925000

Table 4 k-Values for Dry Lean Concrete Subbase (IRC: 58-2011)