Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Natalie Gibson
Brandman University
EDUU 677
Dr. Nicholson
with social skills, repetitive behaviors, speech and nonverbal communication (“What Is
Autism?”, 2012). Communication and language impairments greatly affect most with ASD to
some degree. Several evidence-based practices (EBPs) have been considered as effective
interventions for people with ASD. Three different communication and language interventions
that support those with ASD include Functional Communication Training (FCT), Peer-mediated
Instruction and Intervention (PMII), and Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS).
These interventions can be implemented to work with students with ASD across settings.
systematically identifying the function of the behavior and providing a replacement behavior in
the form of appropriate communication that will enable the learner to get his or her needs met in
a more acceptable way” (Griffin, W., & AFIRM Team, 2017). Because students with Autism
have difficulty with communication, they often display inappropriate or maladaptive behaviors.
FCT is designed to replace interfering behaviors with more appropriate and effective
communication behaviors. FCT is implemented after a Functional Behavior Analysis has been
conducted to identify the function of the interfering (Griffin, W., & AFIRM Team, 2017).
Interfering behaviors are replaced with conventional communicative forms such as pointing,
Implementation”, 2010).
Once teachers have conducted a Functional Behavior Analysis and identified the
interfering behavior, a replacement behavior is selected. The replacement behavior should serve
as the same function as the interfering behavior. Teachers then select a form of communication
COMMUNICATION AND LANGUAGE INTERVENTIONS
3
that is appropriate for the learner. The form of communication should be efficient and
acceptable and appropriate to the learner and the environment. The replacement behavior should
Steps for Implementation”, 2010). Data must be collected to monitor learner progress and
determine the effectiveness of the FCT. The replacement behavior can be generalized across
Peer-mediated Instruction and Intervention (PMII) is also known as Peer Modeling, Peer
Initiation Training, Direct Training for Target Student and Peer, Peer Networks, and Peer
Supports. PMII addresses social concerns by training peers how to initiate and respond to social
interactions of students with ASD (Sam, A., & AFIRM Team, 2015). “Many learners with
autism spectrum disorder (ASD) struggle with social impairments and difficulty with
interactions due to their difficulties in initiating interactions and understanding social cues. Also,
stereotypic or repetitive behavior (hand flapping, body rocking, or head rolling), or inappropriate
behaviors, such as tantrums, might decrease the likelihood that typically developing peers will
initiate social interactions with learners with ASD” (Sam, A., & AFIRM Team, 2015).
PMII teaches peers without disabilities to engage with students with ASD in positive,
meaningful social interactions. PMII is an evidence-based practice for early childhood and
elementary age groups. PMII targets responding to others, reciprocity, understanding others, and
interacting with others or in groups. PMII is intended to be used as part of the daily curriculum
Mediated Instruction and Intervention: Overview”, 2010). Some students with ASD become
overwhelmed by group activities. PMII helps students with ASD increase their engagement in
social responding and social engagement when working with peers without disabilities who have
been trained to engage and interact with those with ASD. Using PMII requires a lot of planning
and training of the peers. It also requires ongoing support and feedback from educators.
program designed for early nonverbal symbolic communication training” (Vicker, 2002). PECS
occurs in natural settings and is used to teach learners with limited functional communication
skills to initiate communicative exchanges and interactions within a social context (Sam, A., &
AFIRM Team, 2016). PECS is a support for students with ASD who have difficulty developing
communicate with others. PECS is initially taught to the learner that they can receive a desired
item in exchange for the picture symbol. The system can then be used for other communicative
functions such as questioning and labeling and can be generalized across settings (PECS).
PECS requires that the person implementing and teaching PECS to the learner be trained
as well as another supporting adult. Assessments to identify the learner’s current communication
ability must be given. The picture and symbol books must be created before the intervention can
be used. There are six phases of PECS instruction to be taught to the learner. The first phase is
to teach the physical assisted exchange. The second phase is expanding spontaneity and the third
is simultaneous discrimination of pictures. The fourth phase is building sentence structure, the
fifth is responding to “What do you want?” and finally the sixth is commenting in response to a
COMMUNICATION AND LANGUAGE INTERVENTIONS
5
question (Sam, A., & AFIRM Team, 2016).. Data must be collected at each phase of PECS to
(PMII), and Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) are three different
communication and language interventions that support students with ASD. Each of these
interventions require a lot of preparation, planning and close progress monitoring to ensure
fidelity. I believe that each of these EBPs needs to be taught to the student in a structured
learning environment where the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention can be
closely monitored. In the case of FCT, one must ensure that the FBA is done with fidelity before
implementing the strategy. Then the data collection must be done accurately and consistently to
determine the effectiveness. For PMII to be effective, one must have close supervision, regular
training and feedback to the non-disabled peers working with the students with ASD. Finally, in
order to use PECS, one must be properly trained and using authentic materials to ensure the
can foresee many challenges in implementing any of the above three EBPs. While the student I
have been observing is higher functioning and not in need of any of these strategies, I can see
how trying to implement them in a general education classroom would be challenging. I think
that any of the above three interventions would be easiest to implement in a smaller, self-
contained environment with more trained adults to supervise in the implementation and data
collection. If implementing these strategies for a student who is included in the general
education setting, I think it would be easiest to work with the student in a pull-out setting, and
COMMUNICATION AND LANGUAGE INTERVENTIONS
6
then generalize into the general education classroom. Paraeducators who work with the student
References
Griffin, W., & AFIRM Team. (2017). Functional communication training. Chapel Hill, NC:
from http://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/functional-communication-training
Sam, A., & AFIRM Team. (2015). Peer-mediated instruction and intervention. Chapel Hill, NC:
from http://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/peer-mediated-instruction-and-intervention
Sam, A., & AFIRM Team. (2016). Picture Exchange Communication System. Chapel Hill, NC:
from http://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/picture-exchange-communication-system
Vicker, B. (2002). What is the Picture Exchange communication System or PECS? The Reporter,
What Is Autism? (2012, May 31). Retrieved May 19, 2018, from
https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-autism