Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
4:3
(GHA) GHANA CHILE (CHI)
a.e.t.
Quarterfinals, 07 July 2013, 20:00 CET – Istanbul (TUR)
1
Final mark according to evaluation scale.
2
Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred).
3
Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: “normal”, “challenging” and “very challenging”.
4
Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.
Evaluation scale
(for referee, ARs and Description of the Marks
fourth official)
9.0 – 10.0 Excellent.
8.5 – 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.
8.3 – 8.4 Good. Expected level.
8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.
8.0 – 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.
7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.
7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 – 8.2.
Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for
7.5 – 7.7
improvement.
Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important
7.0 – 7.4 mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important
mistakes.
6.0 – 6.9 Unacceptable.
Referee
Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)
Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the
referee’s tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams
and players, teamwork etc.).
Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!
Positive Points
His lenient style contributed to the pace of the match. However he was able to
1. detect the clear fouls and did not hesitate to stop the match more often when it
was required.
2. Very good control, achieved by 3.-5.
Good communication, he often explained his decisions to the players and also
3.
listened to them.
Good card management, very lenient in the first half, when he started with verbal
4. warnings instead of bookings, later on stricter, leading to seven cautions, which
were all correct and also tactically well chosen
5. Self-confident behavior and appearance.
6. Good use of the advantage rule.
very very
Tactical Approach lenient medium strict
lenient strict
Description X
Yes So-so No
Consistency in the tactical approach / style X
The tactical approach suited to the require-
ments of the match / the match benefitted X
from the tactical approach of the referee
Ability to adapt the tactical approach if
X
needed
Assistant Referee 1
Assistant Referee 2
Please assess the second assistant referee’s performance.
Fourth Official
Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth official’s behaviour
full time He did not raise any attention, so he probably did his job in a normal way.