Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report

© Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team

(ESP) SPAIN

(ESP) SPAIN 2:1 MEXICO (MEX) Round of 16, 2 July 2013, 17:00 CET – Istanbul (TUR)

2:1

(ESP) SPAIN 2:1 MEXICO (MEX) Round of 16, 2 July 2013, 17:00 CET – Istanbul (TUR)

MEXICO (MEX)

Round of 16, 2 July 2013, 17:00 CET Istanbul (TUR)

Match Officials

Name

ORI

Mark 1

Mark 2

Difficulty 3

Referee

Alireza Faghani

IRN

8.3

 

Normal

Assistant Referee 1

Hassan Kamranifar

IRN

8.3

 

Normal

Assistant Referee 2

Reza Sokhandan

IRN

8.3

 

Normal

Fourth Official

Sandro Ricci

BRA

8.3

 

Normal

Blog Referee Observer

Chefren

ITA

 

1 Final mark according to evaluation scale.

2 Mark without crucial mistake.

3 Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: “normal”, “challenging” and “very challenging”.

4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale

 

(for referee, ARs and fourth official)

Description of the Marks

9.0

10.0

Excellent.

8.5

8.9

Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.

8.3

8.4

Good. Expected level.

8.2

Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.

8.0

8.1

Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.

7.9

One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.

7.8

One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2.

7.5

7.7

Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for improvement.

 

Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important

7.0

7.4

mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important mistakes.

6.0

6.9

Unacceptable.

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.):

Round of 16 in this FIFA U-20 WC 2013, match played between Spain (group A winner) and Mexico (group D third-placed). The referee appointed was Alireza Faghani from Iran, at his second match after Chile-England in the group stage. The game was played in Instanbul at Ali Sami Yen Stadium, in front of an attendance of 7,211. Overall, it was a quite easy match for the referee, without crucial or relevant situations to evaluate.

Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report

Referee

© Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)

(refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.) Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referee’s decision

nothing to report

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the referee’s tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams and players, teamwork etc.). Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!

Positive Points

 

His card management showed a good knowledge of the LotG. The first card was correctly given for a player which deliberately tried to delay the resumption of the

1.

game (mandatory situation), while the second was given for a clear foul on a player which was running towards the area. No DOGSO because there was another defender, and Faghani was able to notice that. Well done.

2.

The foul detection was overall good, he whistled the needed in a fair match.

3.

Teamwork was ok, a few situations were reported to him by assistants

4.

Communication with players and control of the game. Never problems.

Points for Improvement

1.

Excessive usage of the whistle in each situation, trying to recall players.

The referee’s character

 
 

Physical Aspects

+

Expected

-

Fitness / Stamina

 

X

 

Always close to play without interfering with it

 

X

 

Flexible diagonal movement

 

X

 

Positioning at set pieces

 

X

 

Efficient positioning, having a good angle of vision to play

 

X

 

Close to the penalty area, if needed

 

X

 

Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report

© Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Tactical Approach

 

very

lenient

medium

strict

very

lenient

strict

Description

     

X

   
 

Yes

So-so

No

Consistency in the tactical approach / style

 

X

   

The tactical approach suited to the require- ments of the match / the match benefitted from the tactical approach of the referee

X

   

Ability

to

adapt

the

tactical

approach

if

X

   

needed

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character)

Both teams made the work easier for the referee, thank to the fact that they were fair, showing a good football. There wasn’t room for complaints, and the approach chosen by the Iranian official suited well in this match. He can receive a further appointment in this tournament.

Unofficial Referee Observer’s Report

Assistant Referee 1

© Árbitro Internacional & The Third Team

Please assess the first assistant referee’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the AR’s behaviour

30’

Paco Alcacer (ESP) is flagged offside. Correct decision.

61’

Corona (MEX) is flagged offside. Correct and important decision.

Assistant Referee 2

Please assess the second assistant referee’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the AR’s behaviour

32’

Corona (MEX) is correctly evaluated onside.

50’

Paco Alcacer (ESP) is correctly evaluated onside.

74’

Derik (ESP) scores starting from a regular position.

Fourth Official

Please assess the fourth official’s performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth official’s behaviour

Full time

Expected level for the fourth official Sandro Ricci. His duties were well executed, nothing extra-ordinary or relevant happened near the benches.