The New World Order by Conquest or Consent PDF

The New World Order, by Conquest or Consent?
Part 1
By Deanna Spingola
5 May 2006
Join Email List to receive notification of new Spingola articles
On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the

United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we
like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by
conquest or consent.” James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of
Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of
Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through
James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany. A world
government is a world without borders, national sovereignty, constitutions,
privacy, autonomy, individual liberties, religious freedoms, private property,
the right to bear arms, the rights of marriage and family and a dramatic
population reduction (two thirds). A world government establishes a
slave/master environment wherein the state controls everything.
Unfortunately, in the United States, the Establishment’s goal of a New

World Order is reaching fruition through complacent consent and
subversive conquest. America, a Constitutional Republic, is plunging into
the satanical New World Order facilitated by the calculated placement of
unscrupulous individuals deeply dedicated to the goals of the secret societies
they belong to. America, formerly the home of the brave and the free, is
currently the home of the people who merely think they are free. None are
more enslaved and manipulated than those who mistakenly view themselves
as free, therefore rendering them exceptionally vulnerable.
Consent, using mass population management can be achieved by using

elements of Hegelian Dialectics. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-
1831) , the political and social scientist and professor at the University of
Berlin from 1817 until his death in 1831, clearly defined his
philosophical/political concepts that came to be known as Hegelianism. His
ideas are still taught and authors continue to elaborate on his philosophies,
though inattentive Americans fail to acknowledge or even distinguish their
application in our own society despite the obvious and devastating
consequences.
“The philosophy which has dominated the Western world since the mid 19th
century can be reduced to one tenet—ultimate peace comes only through
conflict… It proposes that a clash between ideologies (thesis and antithesis)
is a normal historical phenomenon which always results in compromise
(synthesis) that advances civilization to a higher level of order. “Conflict, in
other words, is good, and peace is not necessarily desirable (or profitable).”
The essence of Hegel's dialectical process is that an idea (thesis) is
challenged by its opposite (antithesis) creating a crisis, problem or conflict
and the two are ultimately reconciled into a third idea (synthesis) or
compromise which includes both. As compromise (synthesis) is achieved the
process is incessantly repeated, with synthesis posturing as thesis, for
sustained conflict-filled advancement. And like spectators at a tennis match,
the populace is so totally distracted by the contrived contentious
confrontations that we do not perceive the motives of the entire conflict
charade. Government creates a crisis for which the public demands a
solution. That solution instigates the changes that the government initially
wanted but which the people would have been unwilling to accept. It is
Order out of Chaos! Worldwide chaos will lead to worldwide solutions
which will establish the New World Order.
Several current crises receiving media attention definitely demand serious

scrutiny. Trust me; the government already has the perfect solution for each
problem.
Crisis #1: Deliberate destabilization is occurring: well financed

demonstrations donning foreign flags, government fines of small business,
chaos, high crime rates, eradicated contagious diseases returning, bankrupt
hospitals, high welfare burdens, lost American wages, and overcrowded
schools are emotionally eviscerating Americans. Minutemen marches and
justified activities are ineffective against the floodgate of the Mexican
masses. Public demand is high as we witness the seemingly impotent
government (thesis) apathetic to the voter’s wishes while their usually
supportive squad of talk radio show shills and the Fox News faction posture
as a very effective opposition (antithesis) purportedly embracing the average
citizen’s viewpoint against the government.
Solution or synthesis: The completely orchestrated invasion by invitation is

essentially the well planned stealthy strategic function of combining the
countries of Canada, the United States and Mexico according to the
treacherous treaty signed on March 23, 2005, by the top political leaders of
the United States, Mexico and Canada: Bush, Fox and Martin. Download the
CFR associated document, Building a North American Community, Task
Force Report 53 for comprehensive details. This invasion enables their goal
with additional perks: thousands of additional jobless citizens will be
available for perpetual warfare paid by borrowed funds from the
international banking cabal. Rampant chaos, assisted by the predicted avian
pandemic may necessitate permanent Martial Law or military order (as after
9-11) which may prevent the 2006 and 2008 “elections” from taking place.
Those “representatives” loyal to the New World Order would then remain in
office, an unlikely circumstance, if our votes actually counted, after their
duplicity in this immigration fiasco.
For security, “voters” (people who actually think they have a voice) will
settle for the compromise legislation that we were unwilling to accept
originally. To prove our legality, we will be amenable to an implanted ID
chip. We won’t complain too loudly about the incarceration of illegals in
those FEMA Concentration Camps. This will make it easier for the
government to imprison dissenters, whistleblowers and patriots. What they
can do to one person, they can do to multitudes.
Crisis #2: Members of the government-friendly mass media are apparently

attempting to provoke public alarm by castigating watchdog journalists who
allegedly leak information which might affect our “national security.” One
popular obedience-trained radio talk show shill suggested subpoenas instead
of Pulitzers. William J. Bennett, Neo-con war hawk PNAC member said:
“But these people who reveal our secrets, who hurt our war effort, who hurt
the efforts of our CIA, who hurt efforts of the president's people--they
shouldn't be given prizes and awards for this; they should be looked into--the
Espionage Act, the investigation of these leaks.”
Journalistic exposés about Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-California),

Bush’s warrant-less domestic surveillance program and the Jack Abramoff
lobbying scandal expose government abuse and corruption. Government is
accountable to the people, not the other way around. In an attempt to prevent
publication of Bush’s illegal assault on our privacy “Bush met with
Executive Editor Bill Keller and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. to argue
against publication.” Gagging the press is censorship – typical only in a
tyrannical government. Freedom of speech is always lost gradually –
unfortunately with the consent of a propagandized frightened populace
willing to give up their freedoms for a measure of security.
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of
opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of
increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its
citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” - Harry S.
Truman
Solution or synthesis: Full ramifications of the legislation already in place

will unfold, which the unwitting populace will readily accept, with the next
contrived crisis or pandemic – the 2007 Intelligence Authorization Act spells
total control from just about every major bureaucratic agency. “H.R. 5020
provides strategic and substantial enhancements in funding for critical,
world-wide intelligence capabilities, strengthens our overall capabilities, and
gives America the modern, lean, mean, agile, and aggressive Intelligence
Community it needs.”
“Finally, the bill requires the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
to develop a comprehensive overhead architecture program to eliminate
waste and ensure rational and coordinated technical programs; improves
coordination between the Intelligence Community and military to increase
our efforts and effectiveness in the Global War on Terror; and increases
House Intelligence and Armed Services coordination to advance common
systems and capabilities to fight the Global War on Terror.” The “war of
terror” is significantly defined as global, the ominous foreshadowing of
“perpetual war for perpetual peace”. Anti-war advocates will be classified as
unpatriotic or worse – probably depicted as traitors via a daily “2-minute
hate session.” “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”
Obviously, there are other crises, orchestrated oppositions, for which

Americans are and will demand solutions – premeditated plans that bring us
closer to the New World Order. People are demanding a solution to the gas
prices which affect every aspect of American life. It isn’t just about gas
availability for summer vacations. Petitions against profanity from friends
and family are wending their way through the Internet asking for a
government solution. Hey people, police yourself and your children – turn
the television off – read a book! Don’t hand the job of parenting to Big
Brother! If they can eliminate profanity, they can eliminate anything –
religion, etc.
Criminal activity, hyped in the news and exacerbated by numerous CSI style
shows, creates the perception of pervasive crime which promotes a general
feeling of fear and vulnerability. Some Chicago churches are compensating
individuals for turning in their guns. Is this a faith-based initiative - churches
collecting guns appears very benign compared to confiscation by uniformed
government agents. Gun control is a major step! Only criminals and the
government (excuse the redundancy) will have guns – now that is the
scariest scenario.
“Our main agenda is to have all guns banned of course. We must use
whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort facts or
even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when
those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” Sarah Brady, 1994
It is amazing that the government can predict the pandemic arrival of the
avian flu Small business suffers while big multinational agri-business
increases. And who knows what is in that vaccine serum – metal, mercury or
some other waste product? Collateral benefit: Donald Rumsfeld makes big
bucks on Gilead stock.
Is another war on the horizon? Should we preemptively nuke Iran – the

threat is whatever the Ministry of Truth and the complicit news media says it
is. Collateral benefit: war profits for the Carlyle Group, that well-connected
defense contractor and don’t forget about Halliburton.
Warrantless domestic surveillance is an affront to our basic Constitutional

freedoms but has been going on for decades. The latest incident was
intentionally “leaked” to evaluate mass response to a more intense invasion
of our privacy. Naïve citizens who aren’t “guilty of anything anyway” claim
they don’t mind if Big Brother listens to their private conversations. “Just
keep us safe from those bogeymen terrorists!”
Certainly, there is a massive amount of contrived crises but I hope I made

my point regarding thesis, antithesis and synthesis.
To provide the ongoing application of these devilish dialectics individuals

from well established covert societies, some more secret than others, finagle
their way into powerful positions within the three branches of the federal
government. This is accomplished through complicit consent and contrived
choice. The quantity of such infiltration is insignificant especially if we
consider the “one rotten apple in a basket” concept. Secret societies, the
genuine conspiracies, are secret for a reason and they exist despite denials
and well-placed “official” counter charges. Activities carried on under the
darkness of concealment are most frequently illegal. Secrecy is not essential
in the glaring light of day.
Antony Sutton stated: “Secret political organizations can be and have been
extremely dangerous to the social health and constitutional validity of a
society. In a truly free society the exercise of political power must always be
open and known.” “Moreover, organizations devoted to violent overthrow of
political structures have always, by necessity, been secret organizations.
Communist revolutionary cells are an obvious example. In fact, such
revolutionary organizations can only function if their existence was secret.
In brief, secrecy in matters political is historically associated with coercion.
Furthermore, the existence of secrecy in organizations with political
ambitions or with a history of political actions is always suspect. Freedom is
always associated with open political action and discussion while coercion is
always associated with secrecy.” We have been brainwashed into believing
absolute secrecy is imperative for our national security.
President Kennedy said of Freemasonry: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is

repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and
historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret
proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and
unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers
which are cited to justify it.” President John F. Kennedy— address to
newspaper publishers, April 27, 1961
Most of these groups or societies embrace New World Order goals; they
include but are not limited to: The Illuminati, Club of Rome, the
Bilderbergs, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), also known
as The Chatham House Study Group founded 1919 in Great Britain and its
sinister sister the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) founded 1921 in
America. The CFR is the largest group. “The plans for these two groups
were drawn up at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The RIIA was largely
funded by the Astor family, The Rhodes Trust and certain British banks
whilst the CFR was a front for JP Morgan &Co.”
“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is promoting

the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and
submergence into an all powerful, one world government.” Chester Ward,
Rear Admiral and former Navy Judge Advocate 1956 – 1960 and a CFR
member for 15 years. Is his attitude reflective of other military leaders who
have also sworn to uphold the Constitution?
Both of these groups were established as proxies for the Rhodes-Milner

Group which was founded at All Souls College, Oxford University by
diamond tycoon Cecil Rhodes (Rhodesia was named for), inspired by John
Ruskin, professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University and Lord Alfred Milner
at the end of the 19th century. The Rhodes Scholarships were created as a
result of an attachment to the 1902 will of Cecil Rhodes:
“The idea gliding and dancing before our eyes like a willow – a wish at last
frames itself into a plan. Why should we not join (or form as other writers
have interpreted Rhodes’ handwriting) a secret society with but one object:
the furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole
uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States,
for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.”
Liberty Tree
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution By Antony C. Sutton
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Dean of the Faculty
Publications on Hegel
Freedom Through Order
Building a North American Community
Bennett: Pulitzer Winners Risen, Lichtblau, Priest 'Worthy of Jail'
Post Wins 4 Pulitzer Prizes; 2 Go to New Orleans Paper
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
Ibid
America’s Secret Establishment, An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones by
Antony c. Sutton, 2002, pg. 185
The Great Trust and Western Foreign Policy, Chapter 3
How The World Really Works by Alan B. Jones, pg. 67
Comments: deannaATspingola.com
To avoid attracting spam email robots, email addresses on this site are
written with AT in place of the usual symbol. Replace AT with the correct
symbol to get a valid address.
Back To Political Points
© Deanna Spingola 2006 - All rights reserved

Deanna Spingola's articles are copyrighted but may be republished, reposted, or emailed.
However, the person or organization must not charge for subscriptions or advertising.
The article must be copied intact and full credit given. Deanna's web site address must
also be included.
The New World Order, the Secrets of Their Success

Part 2
By Deanna Spingola
5 May 2006
The function of the Rhodes-Milner Group, now referred to as The Rhodes

Trust, is to identify and give scholarships to potential leaders to study at
Oxford University. They are introduced to certain concepts/values to
implement within their own countries. Names of just a few of these
scholars/leaders appear on the following brief list: CFR denotes Council on
Foreign Relations member, TC is Trilateral Commission, another New
World Order proponent:
€€€ • Bill Clinton (CFR – TC) (The first former Rhodes Scholar to be
President.)
• David Souter (Supreme Court Judge)
• R. James Woolsey (CFR) (ex-CIA Director 1993-1995)
• Alan Keith Henrikson (CFR) (The Fletcher Roundtable on a New

World Order; Associate, Center for International Affairs, United
Nations Development Programme)
• Richard Jeffrey Danzig (former Under Secretary of the Navy)
• Wesley Kanne Clark (CFR) (Supreme Allied Commander, NATO,

1997-2000; Democratic presidential candidate, 2004)
• David Ruick Bock (16 years at the World Bank)
• David Carter Hardesty Jr. (West Virginia University’s 21st president)

• Ronald Stanley Katz (CFR) (Past Positions: United States Department
of State, Office of the Law of the Sea Negotiations, Deputy Director,
1977 – 1978 United States Justice Department)
• Stephen Alan Oxman (CFR) (Assistant Secretary of State for

European and Canadian Affairs from 1993-1997)
• Dennis Cutler Blair (Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Associate Director of

Central Intelligence for Military Support)
• David Odell Beim (CFR) (executive vice president of the Export-

Import Bank of the United States)
• Walter Becker Slocombe (CFR) (Under Secretary of Defense for

Policy, was a member of the Program Analysis Office of the National
Security Council staff. Senior Advisor for National Defense for the
CPA, Baghdad, 2003)
• Willard Scott Thompson (CFR) (Director, U S Institute for Peace,

Assistant Secretary of Defense)
• W. Bowman Cutter (CFR) (chairman of the Global Information

Infrastructure Commission (GIIC) Steering Committee for the Center
for Strategic & International Studies, Deputy Assistant to the
President for Economic Policy under Clinton, Office of Management
and Budget)
• Walter Isaacson (President of the Aspen Institute, Managing Editor of

Time magazine (1995-2001), Chairman and CEO of CNN)
• Neil L. Rudenstine (CFR) (President of Harvard University,

Executive Vice President of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the
American Philosophical Society, Committee for Economic
Development.)
• Robert B. Reich (American commentator and author, U.S. Secretary

of Labor, 1993-1997)
• Boisfeuillet Jones, Jr. (Publisher and CEO of The Washington Post)

• Strobe Talbott (American diplomat and journalist, U.S. Deputy
Secretary of State (1994-2001), President of the Brookings Institution)
• Richard N. Haass (CFR) (President of the Council on Foreign

Relations, Director of the Policy Planning Staff at the U.S.
Department of State, 2001-2003. From 1989-93, he was special
assistant to President George Bush and senior director for Near East
and South Asian affairs on the staff of the National Security Council.)
• E. J. Dionne (American journalist and Washington Post columnist)
• Paul Blustein (American author and journalist The Washington Post)
• Clark Kent Ervin (Inspector General of the U.S. Department of

Homeland Security)
• William Averell Harriman (CFR) (Initiated into the Skull and Bones
Society with his friend Prescott Bush; Club of Rome, Charter Member
– American Academy of Diplomacy, Knights of Pythias, and Psi
Upsilon Fraternity. US Ambassador to Soviet Union 1943-1946,
Ambassador to Britain in 1946, Secretary of Commerce, Ambassador
at Large in the Kennedy Administration, Assistant Secretary of State
for Far Eastern Affairs, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs,
Chief US Negotiator Paris Peace Talks on Vietnam. He established
W. A. Harriman & Co. in 1922 which changed to Harriman Brothers
& Co. when his brother E. Roland joined the company in 1927. They
merged with Brown Bros. & Co. in 1931 to become Brown Brothers
Harriman & Co. Employees included George Herbert Walker and
Prescott Bush, who were likewise employed alongside E. R. Harriman
at Union Banking Corporation (UBC), a company which was closed
in 1943 by the US Government for Trading with the Enemy. (A
family trait?)
• Ivan A. Getting (American weapons scientist and co-inventor of GPS

technology)
See the complete list.
The Bilderberg Group, another very secret society, was under the
chairmanship of H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, who served in
that position for twenty-two years beginning in 1954. Creation of the group
was not Bernhard’s brainchild but that of politically connected Dr Joseph H.
Retinger. After decades of covert conniving, it was most likely the first
formally scheduled meeting of the banking elite and other prominent
individuals. The group’s purpose: coordination of American and European
foreign policy towards establishing a New World Order. “At a small hotel
near Arnhem in the deeply wooded uplands of eastern Holland on May 29-
31, 1954, a group of eminent statesmen, financiers, and intellectuals from
the principal nations of Europe and the United States met together in,
perhaps, the most unusual international conference ever held until then.”
The hotel was The Hotel de Bilderberg in the Dutch town of Oosterbeek
from which the group takes its name. Since then, a yearly meeting, strictly
secure and highly confidential, is held in various places where powerful
people, who crave even more power, meet. See the lists of attendees since
1991; they include media, government, and corporate business owners.
Governor Bill Clinton attended in 1991 – pre-approval of his presidency? Do
a cross-check of the Bilderberg and the Rhodes Scholar list. George W.
Bush just happened to be visiting the Pope in 2004 at the very same time as
the Bilderbergs 50th anniversary conference in Stresa, Italy – what a
coincidence! Interestingly enough, Senator John Edwards was also there –
perhaps to verify his selection as Kerry’s running mate.
“It is a fact that in Europe, membership in the Bilderberger group guarantees

political success. Not surprisingly, opposition to Bilderberger dogma will
result in loss of power and position.” European politicians adhere to the
Bilderberg policies or suffer the consequences. Margaret Thatcher, Prime
Minister of the United Kingdom, opposed the Bilderbergs and their 1992
goal of a European consolidation along with the adoption of a standard
European currency. Apparently she voiced this opposition at the annual
meeting in Spain in May 1989 much to the detriment of her career.
Thereafter, “Thatcher was viciously attacked by every known media source
within days of the meeting. She was denounced in almost all European
newsprint, television, and radio as a ‘provisionalist’ and an ‘Ultra-
nationalist,’ and that was only the beginning. Within days, a parliamentary
assault was initiated against her.” On November 28, 1990, she was
succeeded by John Major.
The Bilderberg elite demanded that President Ronald Reagan provide $50
billion taxpayer dollars from the U.S. Treasury over the period of Reagan’s
presidency, eight years, to be given to third world countries through the
World Bank and the IMF. That’s big money for an acting job placement –
thanks to the U.S. taxpayers. In the 1988 meeting, the group insisted on an
American tax increase to increase funding of the IMF and World Bank.
These treasonous acts constituted a redistribution of money from the
American taxpayer’s pocket into the banker’s vaults. The poor received no
benefits. The tax increase cost George H. W. Bush a second term. Perhaps
his first-born son, George W. Bush, would be compensated later for his
father’s loss. It was the Bilderbergs who decided that hundreds of billions of
American taxpayer dollars should fund the new democracy in the former
Soviet Union. We were also required to buy needless, over-priced
undelivered Soviet products to pump up their economy – more taxpayer
dollars for covetous bankers and payola for accommodating third world
Judases who also sacrificed their people. The Bilderbergers mandated the
invasion of Bosnia. When the wicked rule, those who don’t get slaughtered
mourn.
Though select members of the media attend, they are discreet. David
Rockefeller, speaking at the June 1991, Bilderberger meeting in Baden
Baden, Germany said: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New
York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors
have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for
almost forty years.” He went on to explain: “It would have been impossible
for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the
lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to
the national determination practiced in past centuries.” The media does,
however, spin webs of deceit and furnish appropriate propaganda for elite
political selections – Bilderberger Bill Kristol, publisher of The Weekly
Standard through his editor, Fred Barnes, wrote a remarkably favorable
report portraying George W. Bush as the “heavyweight” candidate prior to
2000. No doubt, because of all the silver spoons in his mouth and those elite
connections.
The Illuminati, a secret society to counter the influence of the clergy, was
founded and structured after the Masonic model at the University of
Ingolstadt on May 1, 1776 by atheist Adam Weishaupt. “This contestation
embraced Manichean symbolism, a war between light and darkness, between
the illumination of reason and the sordid dark ignorance of religious
superstition.” The goal was a secularized, counterfeit perfection of mankind,
without Jesus Christ.
In an attempt to emulate Christianity, reason postured as revelation and

nature, the created replaced the Creator. The holy book for Christian
enlightenment was the Bible, while the 36 volumes of atheist Diderot’s
Encyclopedia was the inspiration of the Enlightenment – all the while trying
to eliminate God. This encyclopedia included imprints of Voltaire,
Montesque, Rousseau, Buffon and Turgot. Significantly, the title page of
Diderot's first edition offered a drawing of Lucifer, symbol of light and
rebellion, standing next to the Masonic symbols of square and compass.
The Illuminati studied the Enlightenment philosophers to battle against the

Jesuits and strengthen the Illuminati philosophy through their literature.
Weishaupt stated: “Princes and Nations shall disappear from off the face of
the earth! Yes, a time shall come when man shall acknowledge no other law
but the great book of nature; this revelation shall be the work of Secret
Societies and that is one of our grand mysteries.” The Illuminati had two to
three thousand members and spread throughout Europe including Poland,
Holland, England and France. Many functioned within illuminized Masonic
Lodges. “Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744-1803), German philosopher,
Atheist and composer was an Illuminist, as was Johann Wolfgang Goethe
(1749-1823), German philosopher, writer and privy councilor. Goethe is best
known, perhaps, as the creator of Faust, which some have speculated to be
an Illuminist allegory.” In 1785, the Order that was intent on restructuring
the state and destroying the church was officially abolished, unless of course
it merely resurfaced in America as the more sinister, more secret
Brotherhood of Death or the Order of Skull and Bones.
Probably the most secretive group, The Brotherhood of Death or the Order
of Skull and Bones, also known as Chapter 322 or simply The Order, is the
powerful all-male society that was established at Yale University for the
elite children or grandchildren of the Wall Street Banking Establishment.
George W. Bush, whose father and grandfather were members, remarked:
“My senior year, I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret I can’t
say anything more.” The Order was co-founded by Alphonso Taft (Secretary
of War in the Grant Administration) and William Huntington Russell and
thirteen others. Skull and Bones “is a clear and obvious threat to
constitutional freedom in the United States. Its secrecy, power and use of
influence are greater by far than the Masons, or any other semi-secret mutual
or fraternal organization.”
The Order was incorporated as The Russell Trust in 1856 by Daniel Coit
Gilman as treasurer and William H. Russell as president. For the next
fourteen years Gilman consolidated the power of The Order. More about
Gilman and his influence in the field of medicine will be given later.
William Russell’s cousin Samuel established Russell and Company in 1823

which was an opium empire which acquired opium in Turkey and smuggled
it into China. More than one prominent American family made a fortune
through drug smuggling. Warren Delano, Jr. (grandfather of Franklin
Roosevelt) was Chief of Operations for Russell and Company in Canton.
Other Russell business associates included John Cleve Green (financed
Princeton), Abiel Low (financed construction of Columbia.), and Joseph
Coolidge (his son organized United Fruit and grandson, Archibald C.
Coolidge, was a co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations.) Read
about United Fruit and their monopolies in third world countries here.
The un-American chapter of a German Order was established at Yale on

June 28, 1832 when Russell returned there after studying in Germany from
1831-1832 where he was exposed to Hegel’s philosophical ideas which
found great popularity and ready acceptance in the German educational
system. It has been suggested that while William Huntington Russell was in
Germany “he was initiated into a secret society with a skull and bones for its
emblem. Some even claim that he was initiated into a continuation of the
Illuminati and granted authorization to start a Yale chapter.”
“Members are chosen in their junior year and spend only one year on
campus, the senior year, with Skull & Bones. In other words, the
organization is oriented to the post graduate outside world.” This society is
by invitation only - just fifteen candidates each year for a total membership
of about 2500. At any given time only about 600 or so members of The
Order are alive. Of that number only 150 (about one-quarter) take an active
role in the society. It is estimated that a core of perhaps 20-30 families run
The Order. “The most likely potential member is from a Bones family, who
is energetic, resourceful, political and probably an amoral team player. A
man who understands that to get along you have to go along. A man who
will sacrifice himself for the good of the team… In real life the thrust of The
Order is to bring about certain objectives. Honors and financial rewards are
guaranteed by the power of The Order.”
Members of Skull & Bones have infiltrated “just about every significant
research, policy, opinion-making organization in the United States, in
addition to the church, business, law, government and politics. The evolution
of American society is not, and has not been for a century, a voluntary
development reflecting individual opinion, ideas and decisions at the grass
roots. On the contrary, the broad direction has been created artificially and
stimulated by The Order.”
Bonesmen support one another in their quests for successful infiltration into
various endeavors. “A couple of Bonesmen came up with the money to
launch President Bush's career in business when he founded the oil company
Arbusto; another Bonesman provided the capital for Bush to acquire a stake
in the Texas Rangers; and another member of the fraternity that bolstered
Bush's 2000 presidential campaign by paying for advertising billboards at a
million dollars a piece. One of President Bush's first actions when he entered
the White House was to organize a dinner with the members of his
fraternity.”
Go to Part 3
The Rhodes Trust

William Averell Harriman
Downside Legacy on Rhodes Scholars See also Wikipedia
Extract from 'H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands; an authorized biography' by
Alden Hatch
Ibid
Bilderberg Secret Meeting of 2004
The Satori and the New Mandarins by A. H. Krieg, page 221
The Enlightenment, Freemasonry, and The Illuminati by Conrad Goeringer
Ibid
Ibid
Ibid, pg. 186
Everything you wanted to know about Skull & Bones by Kris Milligen
William Huntington Russell, Wikipedia
Skull and Bones origins
Ibid, pgs. 6-7
Ibid, pg. 25
Skull and Bones in Bush's Foreign Policy Closet
also be included.
The New World Order, It’s Their Party!

Part 3
By Deanna Spingola
10 May 2006
The super secretive Order of Skull and Bones is non partisan – it is not right
or left, conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat. Of the secret
groups, The Order and the Bilderberg Group are the most secretive. The
Order may, in fact, be the core of the others. Each group appears to have
specific activities toward the development of the New World Order. “The
activities of The Order are directed towards changing our society, changing
the world, to bring about a New World Order. This will be a planned order
with heavily restricted individual freedom, without Constitutional protection,
without national boundaries or cultural distinction.” Therefore, The Order
controls Republican Bonesmen and Democrat Bonesmen.
The Order of Skull and Bone’s methodology is a strict adherence to

Hegelian Dialectics. Apply those dialectics to the two political parties.
Essentially, political parties are artificial groupings designed to create
division. A contrived choice between two bad options, without recognizing
alternative better options, creates the perception of freedom. Supposedly
opposing ideologies generates deliberate distraction and polarizations (as in
divide and conquer). The very public, distracting, lengthy, increasingly
hostile battle between the Republicans, posing as thesis, and the Democrats
posing as antithesis is nothing but orchestrated opposition. Elections, staged
for the masses, are completely irrelevant political soap operas. Domestic and
foreign policies remain precisely the same despite which puppet president is
in office.
Despite popular misconceptions, our government is supposed to be a

representative Republic (not a democracy). In both democracies and
Republics people vote. That single act does not make you free. Those who
finagle their way into office are supposed to represent the voters who
allegedly put them there. They are also supposed to sustain an invariable
written law – the Constitution which mandates civil law and our response to
it. The non-negotiable Constitution is our explicit gauge of right and wrong,
applicable to all without special considerations for politicians, sports stars or
“insider” corporate criminals. Since Woodrow Wilson, we have descended
into a Socialistic democracy (adaptable mob rule, adjustable laws and poll
driven public opinions). Democracies, in which selective enforcement of law
is rampant, are short lived, for they typically morph into oppressive
tyrannies.
“Whenever laws are passed, under whatever form, if they do not represent
the will of the majority of the people or their desires, then they represent
oppression. That is to say, we in America today have an oppressive
government because it passes laws against the will of the people. Thus, we
no longer have a Republic. A strong case can be made that America in the
21st century is an Empire, as was Britain in the 19th. Any government that
would even consider an issue as ludicrous as ‘hate crimes,’ i.e. the concept
of policing thought, is in very serious jeopardy.”
Of the three branches of government, only the legislative branch is

authorized to make law. Presidential executive orders have been
unconstitutionally used to make law. The Judicial branch, the Supreme
Court, is supposed to interpret the constitutionality of a law. Rather, they
invent new interpretations never envisioned by the founding fathers. “It is
the duty of the Supreme Court to interpret the constitution as ratified by the
states, not to invent preposterous meanings which were not originally
intended by the authors. The judiciary makes law through changing
precedents as well as by invention, neither of which are constitutionally
authorized.”
Of the choices in 2004 we had two professional politicians, members of the
same silver-spooned secret society whose dedicated function is the
destruction of the country, pretending to relate to the working masses while
the media sheltered the compromised loyalties of the candidates and ignored
any other possibilities. We have already arrived at synthesis – a merging of
the two parties into one which favors mammoth government, unrestrained
illegals, out-of-control deficit spending, high taxes, continued abortion, big
brother spying, loss of freedoms through the Patriot Act, big business/big
government cronyism, preemptive war, loss of jobs and the authentic free
market, treacherous trade agreements that have nothing to do with trade, all
driven by that covert agenda. Impervious to how each party behaves versus
their rhetoric, conditioned party loyalists accept a multitude of
misconceptions.
Lack of unification behind the Constitution, the law of the land, will lead
citizens of the un-United States to ultimately accept enslaving compromise –
all the while enjoying their perceptions of freedom. “We are either a united
people, or we are not. If the former, let us, in all maters of general concern
act as a nation, which have national objects to promote, and a national
character to support. If we are not, let us no longer act a farce by pretending
to it.” George Washington (letter to James Madison, 30 November
1785) Reference: George Washington: A Collection, W. B. Allen, ed. (315)
If Americans actually believe that we select and then elect candidates, we

are sadly deceived. The Establishment selects all major candidates,
Manchurian and/or political. “Since its founding, the Bilderberg Group has
functioned as a de facto private Global Politburo with 120 attendees at
recent yearly meetings. Historically, the Group's power is awesome. Bill
Clinton, an obscure Arkansas governor, was tapped to run for president.
Likewise, Margaret Thatcher, as well as Tony Blair, was tapped by the
Bilderbergers to assume the reins of government in the United Kingdom.
Congressman Gerald Ford --- later US president --- also attended Group
meetings in 1964 and 1966.” Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter, an obscure
peanut farmer, joined forces with the Bilderberg Group. In all likelihood,
every presidential candidate in the last five decades has collaborated with the
Bilderberg.
Voters witness this contrived opposition in every national election. In the

staged elections of 2000, our mock “choices” were Gore and Bush. “In the
months leading up to the November balloting, Gov. Jeb Bush ordered
elections supervisors to purge 58,000 voters on the grounds they were felons
not entitled to vote. As it turns out, only a handful of these voters were
felons. As a result, 50,000 of these voters could not vote. The fact that 90%
of these were Democrats should have made it news as this alone more than
accounted for Bush’s victory.” I am neither Republican nor Democrat. “In
four states — Alabama, Kentucky, Virginia and Florida — people with any
felony conviction are barred for life from the polls, unless the government
grants them individual rights through a petition process.”
Puppet leaders in any country owe their allegiance to the entities that
installed them into office, not to the masses they profess to lead. There are
several methods of political installations or resignations: military coups, CIA
assassinations of leaders who are antagonistic to American big business
interests, paperless electronic voting machines, an illegal Supreme Court
decision or a current popularly elected leader’s CIA enforced resignation.
Installed dictators wreak havoc against their own citizens and any other
country that they target in their quest for the advancement of world
government.
Idealistically, individuals are elected to faithfully represent and proxy vote in

the name of their constituents. However, there are variables – representatives
may vote in several different ways:
• Vote their conscience
• Vote for what they think their constituents want
• Vote based on Executive Branch pressure
• Vote based on lobbyists' perks
• Vote with the party leadership
The last, voting with the party leadership is the most common – it is party
politics and voting the party line at the expense of the voter! I have never
called or written, nor do I know of anyone who has, my congressional
leaders to request that they give themselves a healthy pay raise, a
millionaire-maker pension or a great all encompassing family health care
program that dwarfs any of the salaries or other benefits of the average
American worker. However, I have made numerous calls, sent abundant
faxes, letters and emails requesting, nay demanding, constitutionally sound
votes on such things as CAFTA. I did get a reply from my pro-abortion, pro-
big business representative telling me that she had voted for the CAFTA
(passed and signed into law on August 2, 2005) bill for three reasons:
1. “It will help our manufacturers.
2. It bolsters our national security as it helps strengthen relationships

with six very important new governments in our own backyard.
3. This agreement will help the anti-poor efforts in these six nations,
stem the flow of illegal immigration to the U.S., and reverse China’s
dominance in textiles and apparel.”
She ended her letter by saying: “I am sorry we did not see eye-to-eye on this
issue, but I hope this information and the enclosed fact sheet on benefits for
Illinois might help to allay some of your concerns about the agreement.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me again on this or any other issue that
interests you.” Well Representative Biggert, thanks for your belated
response reminding me and others that you no longer represent the voter. It
must have taken some extra time and creativity to come up with the
concocted excuses for your complicity in destroying our sovereignty with a
phony trade agreement that you probably didn’t even read before voting.
I am certain that the voter’s views of CAFTA paralleled their perceptions of

NAFTA. The “representatives” didn’t read that bill either. It wasn’t even
published until several weeks after the vote. Over 80% of the American
population opposed NAFTA. Obviously, Representative Biggert didn’t
bother to view the disastrous results of NAFTA on the American middle
class and she apparently believes that no one else noticed the huge demise of
7 million manufacturing jobs. Fifteen hundred manufacturing plants
relocated to Mexico as a result of NAFTA. So why are so many Mexicans
coming north to work in “jobs Americans won’t do”? Moving those plants
should have provided motivation for workers to remain in their own country.
Folks, we have been set up and lied to on a regular basis. Only a complicit
politician ignores the cause and effect of the legislative disaster and hopes
the voters don’t notice. She will be elected again by amnesia afflicted or
ignorant voters who may now work two jobs to keep afloat.
But I digress. Suffice it to say – both parties are owned and reek with
corruption. In the 2004 election the Establishment selected Kerry to run
against the incumbent Bush, both committed members of Skull and Bones
and both adept in the art of orchestrated opposition. The candidates
deliberately ignored the real issues while focusing attention on other things.
Bush’s Bones membership would have been the very last issue that the
Democrats would have mentioned. Instead attention to military and
drug/DUI arrest records and Kerry’s possible lack of dedication to the Iraqi
War with the intention of introducing the frightening possibility that Kerry
couldn’t keep us safe from those bogeymen terrorists. That timely
counterfeit Osama video, in addition to the dedicated, yet deceitful,
Republicans monitoring the software in the Ohio voting machines clinched
the staged election.
With Katherine Harris and the U.S. Supreme Court, Bush “won” the
election. What a surprise!! – NOT! Papa George H. W. Bush nominated two
of the Judges that sat on that Court. I wonder if that is significant. Three
other Court members were: Sandra Day O'Connor, Steve G. Breyer, and
Ruth B. Ginsburg, members of the Council on Foreign Relations, that other
group dedicated to obliterating American sovereignty.

Our Political Systems by Dr. Adrian Krieg, pg. 58-59
Ibid
New World Order, Part 2
Media Cover-up
Voting rights denied for convicted felons
How American Elections Became a Criminal Enterprise
Letter from Judy Biggert, representative for big government, big business and voting with
the Republican Machine, dated March 27, 2006
Ibid
The Supreme Court of the United States
Openly Attacking American Sovereignty (Excerpt)

also be included.
The New World Order, Bush, the Best of the Worst

Part 4
By Deanna Spingola
10 May 2006
George W. Bush, despite threats of impending impeachment and

indictments, and magazine articles claiming he is the worst president in
history has had a more incredibly successful presidential administration than
any other in the last 100 years. We can attribute this to his character, his
society affiliations, his astute political appointments, his Yale education, his
experience and his Eastern Establishment family background. The vast and
very vocal Christian right played a major part in his success. They were
greatly influenced by Bush’s claim that his role model was Jesus Christ. He
is the right man for this crucial time in history. His success and
accomplishments are unmatched. His America First Acceptance Speech of
2000 bears absolutely no resemblance to his New World Order actions.
Despite the globalist accomplishments of previous administrations, he has
virtually left all of them in the dust. And speaking of leaving people in the
dust – as a result of his invasion of Iraq, depleted uranium dust has covered
more territory, crept into more water and affected the health of more people
than at any other time in history.
George W. Bush is definitely his father’s son. The senior Bush, also a
member of The Order, served the ignoble New World Order cause as a Vice-
President, President, head of the CIA, ambassador to the People's Republic
of China and other influential positions. It is unfortunate that the citizens do
not have a complete record of his many deeds and activities. This is partly
due to Executive Order 13233 which conveniently restricts access to the
records of former presidents. This was drafted by Alberto R. Gonzales, then
White House council and issued by George W. Bush on November 1, 2001,
just before the National Archives was due to release some very revealing
records, “some of which might prove embarrassing to the President's father,
George H. W. Bush, due to his involvement in the Iran-Contra Affair.”
Censorship by Executive Order or theft by former national security advisers

suppresses or destroys a lot of evidence. Any “leak” is absolutely
intentional! With the Bush administration, secrecy is epidemic, much more
genuine than any impending crisis-driven bird flu outbreak. Donald H.
Rumsfeld is one happy Gilead Sciences stock holder with this orchestrated
improbable scare crisis. He was Chairman of the Board of Gilead until early
2001 when he became Secretary of Preemptive War. Tamiflu, made by
Gilead, is the bird flu drug of choice in the world market. He will certainly
not suffer any Martha Stewart style complications. Nor will the
insider/insiders who made millions immediately before 9/11 because of their
foreknowledge. Can insider trading be repetitive or addictive, I wonder…
The elder Bush appointed two Supreme Court judges: David Souter, a
Rhodes Scholar and Clarence Thomas who is a member of the right-wing
Federalist Society which tends to dominate the legal profession. Scalia is
also a member of the Federalist Society. The Rhodes Trust is intent on
overthrowing the American government. Both Scalia’s and Thomas’ votes
were crucial in putting Bush into the White House in 2000 despite a minority
of popular votes.
Son Bush has also pushed through two Supreme Court judges who will
further the cause. Naïve Republican supporters focused on the abortion
issue, the so-called “settled law of the land” when shoo-ins John Roberts and
Samuel Alito were nominated after the Harriet Miers pretense. Anticipated
rejection of Miers set up easier acceptance of successive nominees.
“Conservatives” would have been wiser to focus on the nominee’s views of
executive powers. Fathers with unfinished goals typically hope that their
children can rise to the occasion and complete those unfinished tasks.
George W. has certainly done this. In fact, to ensure continuation of the
agenda, he has chosen or appointed many of the same accomplices as were
in his father’s sphere of influence. Additionally, he has selected other CFR
members to speed up the pace.
President George H. W. Bush, a member of The Order of Skull and Bones,

said in 1991: “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and
for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not
the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are
successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order,
an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to
fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.” Nuclear clouds and
deadly depleted uranium dust are rarely experienced in the natural
interactions of the jungle, only human animals use such implements of death
against their own kind.
Papa Bush is extremely loyal to the United Nations which is attempting to

replace Christianity with a new world religion: “It is the sacred principles
enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will
henceforth pledge their allegiance,” said President George Bush, Sr.
addressing the General Assembly of the United Nations, February 1, 1992
Referring to Saddam Hussein, President George H. W. Bush on January

1991: “If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and
stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and
democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long
dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long.” He said this just
prior to bombing Iraq into the Stone Age and killing thousands of people.
Lawlessness is lawlessness – whether it is Saddam Hussein using United
States supplied weapons of mass destruction against the citizens of Iraq or a
United States president using United States weapons of mass destruction
against the citizens of Iraq. The results are the same: thousands of dead
Iraqis! Only the captured, the mind-controlled or the losers in this war racket
go to trial for crimes. Labels make all the difference: calling it war justifies
the mounds of dead bodies attributed to the United States and the
acquiescent accommodating taxpayers.
He couldn’t have done a better job if he were a dictator. “If this were a
dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.”
President-elect George W. Bush, CNN News, aired December 18, 2000. He
is a member of The Order of Skull and Bones first and an American
Republican second. Bush has taken the following oath twice: “I do solemnly
swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the
United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States.” We do not have a copy of the oath for
The Order of Skull and Bones – it is secret. That should tell volumes.
“Members of the Order (Skull and Bones) take an oath that absolves them
from any allegiance to any nation or king or government or constitution, and
that includes the negating of any subsequent oath which they may be
required to take. They swear allegiance only to the Order and its goal of a
New World Order...according to the oath Bush took when he was initiated
into Skull and Bones, his oath of office as President of the United States
means nothing.”
Just what has Bush achieved in taking America into the New World Order?
• He continually minimizes the Constitution by repeatedly

demonstrating his unwillingness to follow it
• He has issued thousands of unconstitutional Presidential Executive

Orders
• The invasion of Afghanistan 3,000 - 3,400 dead civilians [October 7,

2001 thru March 2002]
• Consequent resumption of poppy production in Afghanistan
• He got rid of the Bridas Corporation an obstacle to the United States

controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline.
• The invasion of Iraq – see the population reducing Civilian body

count
• The undefended invasion invasion of America – 9-11
• He strengthened FEMA
• Invasion by invitation of America – 2000 -2008 by poverty stricken

illegal aliens to be used as cheap labor
• Continued destruction of the middle class
• Increased the deficit – pouring trillions into the banker’s coffers.
• Politically blackmailed Congress into passing the un-read CAFTA
• Politically blackmailed Congress into passing the un-read Patriot Act

1 and 2
• Established the nefarious Department of Homeland Security
• Fooled ordinary Christians into believing he was one of them
• Returned the war hawk neo-cons to leadership positions in strategic

fields
• Collaborated with two foreign countries about the dissolution of our

borders
• Enriched his cronies and family through no-bid contracts
• Strengthened Detention and Removal Strategy for a Secure Homeland

2003-2012 – part of the Department of Homeland Security. PDF file
• Implemented the building of all of those detention centers by

Halliburton
• Bush has claimed the authority to break more rules than any other
president
• Sent billions of confiscated tax dollars out of the country – not his to
give
• Abetted in the sale of national properties to foreign governments
• He told us to stop worrying about conspiracy theories and some

people did
• He has responded to the concerns of the drug companies and agri-

business
• Through his efforts there are higher profits for the pharmaceutical
industry
• Got rid of that annoying Geneva Conventions requiring humane

treatment
• He broadened the government’s wiretapping, surveillance and search-

and-seizure authority
• He ushered in a new era of secrecy for presidential activities
• He has assumed sole authority to impose martial law, suspend habeas

corpus and ignore the Posse Comitatus Act
• He bypassed the Senate and appointed John Bolton as ambassador to

the United Nations.
• Instituted The National Security Strategy of the United States of

America
Although he has accomplished many things there are a few areas where he
has failed: he did not find Osama bin Laden. 750,000 Americans are
homeless, 250,000 of them are Veterans. 1,600,000 jobs have been lost in
the private sector since Bush took office. He didn’t get those warrants or the
authority for all that wire tapping. And the number of lobbyists in
Washington has increased. But, hey, we can’t quibble about the goals he
didn’t accomplish when we see just how successful he has been!
Illegal entry into the country has doubled since Bush’s infamous guest
worker flood-gate invitation. This has certainly ravaged our sovereignty and
pitted the pro-amnesty against the no-amnesty factions. The illegals are
mostly comprised of poor Mexicans, made poorer by illegal trade
agreements like NAFTA. “George H. W. Bush's government, along with the
Conservative Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, spearheaded the
negotiations of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which
Bill Clinton signed in 1993.” NAFTA, which was staunchly supported by
Governor George W. Bush, is a major means of combining Canada, the
United States and Mexico into the North American Community. The next
plan to attack our sovereignty is another phony trade agreement, the FTAA.
July 18, 1993 -- CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the
Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA: “What Congress will have before it
is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new
international system... a first step toward a new world order.”
“When NAFTA was passed, one of the primary arguments was that trading
with Mexico would create new jobs in America. The argument prevailed
despite historical and research studies indicating that a NAFTA would
encourage movement of manufacturing and labor intensive jobs to Mexican
nationals, at the expense of American jobs. The Mexicans spent millions on
lobbyists, and in public meetings in Mexico, bragged about how with
NAFTA they had ‘out-traded the Americans again’ and that a new flood of
industrial jobs would come into Mexico. NAFTA passed, and the flow of
capital into Mexico increased further. Mexico created new companies almost
daily, but also incurred new debt. Of the some 70 billion dollars invested in
Mexico, only 10 billion actually went into new factories, industry, capital
creation, and job creation entities. The rest went into speculation, debt
service, and into the coffers of the 32 wealthiest ‘haciendas’ of Mexico.
Much of it flowed into offshore banks and investment houses.” “Mexico is a
land of 90,000,000 people. Perhaps 200,000 people in Mexico control most
of the wealth, and some 32 families, all billionaires, control the vast majority
of wealth in Mexico.” In this regard, there are similarities with the United
States.
Unfortunately, Mexico, along with many other third world countries, was a
victim of some economic hit men. Their tactics were recently revealed by
John Perkins in his excellent, must-read book: Confessions of an Economic
Hit Man. Mexico was generating about 30 billion dollars a year towards
paying the debt service or interest on its international banking cabal loans.
Yet the actual cost amounted to 40-45 billion dollars per year. Alan
Greenspan, then chairman of the privately owned Federal Reserve increased
the interest rates in late 1994 which “devastated the Mexican Economy.” In
December 1994, Mexico devalued the peso by about 40 percent. Congress
immediately approved a $40 taxpayer funded billion dollar loan despite debt
burdened Mexico’s inability to repay it. That loan was merely a transfer
from our pockets into the international bankers’ coffers.
Spending confiscated taxpayer money to partially “fix” orchestrated

problems furthers the New World Order goal. Government solutions
deceptively deprive security seeking citizens of their liberties by installing
totalitarian policies. This is the case with our current southern border
problem. We have moved from a protective, American friendly immigration
policy to an open Swiss cheese farce of a border. While Americans take
sides and witness Republican and Democrat congressmen pair up against us,
we fail to recognize that the disbanding of both the southern and northern
borders is part of an organized plan to reject national sovereignty and
establish the North American Community encompassing Canada, Mexico
and the United States.
All the attending uproar and big-money-financed demonstrations are for
mass media benefit. “In late December 2005, Mexican President Vicente
Fox hired a lobbying firm to sweeten political sentiment in the US towards
Mexicans and the immigration issue. The same PR expert and GOP political
consultant helped George W. Bush defeat Ann Richards for the governorship
of Texas in 1994 and worked on both Bush's presidential campaigns.” This
PR firm planned highly organized, expensive, flag-flying, controlled
opposition demonstrations with the expected congressional treasonous
response is designed to change mass American opposition into complacent
acceptance – and provide justification for the impending national ID, which
will serve as an alleged attempt to monitor all of those newly created
citizens.
President George W. Bush said: “Our enemies are innovative and

resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to
harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” Is this another
Bushism or the absolute truth – you decide! Or does “The Decider” get to
make that decision?
Go to Part 5
The Worst President in History?

Governor George W. Bush - Acceptance Speech
George H. W. Bush
Executive Order 13233
Ibid
White House Trains Efforts on Media Leaks
Bird Flu: A Corporate Bonanza for the Biotech Industry
The Power Elite & George W.
Council on Foreign Relations Thugs in the George H. W. Bush Regime
Ibid
William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, pgs. 81-82
George H. W. Bush, Wikipedia
The disturbing ties of some of George W. Bush’s Latino advisors See also George W.
Bush's Speech on Latin America
Texas and Mexico, Immediate Impact of the Mexican Crisis
Ibid
NAFTA and the Peso Collapse Not Just a Coincidence, PDF file
Illegal Immigration & the Law
Building a North American Community, the Selling of America
Foreign Government Manipulates US Domestic Policy With Help of the Bush Mafia and
Their PR Cronies
Remarks by the President at the Signing of H.R. 4613, the Defense Appropriations Act
for Fiscal Year 2005, Room 350, Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office Building
also be included.
The New World Order, Programming the Masses

Part 5
By Deanna Spingola
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of

men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and
religious dogmas.” “We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties
fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians,
our priests....The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of
right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution
of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of old people,
these are the belated objectives ...for charting the changes in human
behavior.” Brock Chisholm, 1959 Humanist of the Year and former head of
World Health Organization, in the February 1946 issue of Psychiatry
The manipulating maneuvers of The Order of Skull and Bones (hereafter

called The Order) have focused on specifically changing society with an eye
towards the globalist goal of a One World Order. In order to drastically alter
civilization, members of The Order infiltrate society’s institutions and use
their influence, backed by the vast wealth of the international bankers, to
gain absolute control. The societal elements as defined by Antony C. Sutton
in An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones:
• Education – how the population of the future will behave.
• Money – the means of holding wealth and exchanging goods.
• Law – the authority to enforce the will of the state, a world law and a
world court is needed for a world state.
• Politics – the direction of the state.
• Economy – the creation of wealth.
• History – what people believe happened in the past.
• Psychology – the means of controlling how people think.
• Philanthropy – so that the people think well of the controllers.
• Medicine – the power over health, life and death.
• Religion – people’s spiritual beliefs, the spur to action for many.
• Media – what people know and learn about current events.
• Continuity – the power to appoint who follows in your footsteps.
I will briefly address, in this and forthcoming articles in this current series,
each of these fundamental facets of society and how they have been
controlled in order to devastate the American Republic and enslave every
average American in the bonds of satanic globalism.
Education:
Real education, as opposed to brainwashing, should be a lifelong personal
pursuit rather than a state scheduled mass indoctrination limited to just what
the state wants you to know or believe in order to fulfill some stealthily
crafted agenda for the dismal existence of the masses. Ideally, people, as
they are exposed to a growing body of information and technology, should
have the opportunity to exercise their inherent abilities in order to expand
their understanding.
At birth, our minds are empty vessels waiting to be stimulated. We adapt to
what we absorb. Perceptions about the world, about ourselves and others are
developed primarily by our parents and then by our teachers, our relatives,
friends, politicians and the media. Discrimination and wisdom increase with
age – we must choose exactly what we wish to imbibe: facts which educate
or fiction that merely entertains. Most entertainment leaves us ignorant and
vulnerable to misinformation and deceptive propaganda. A dumbed-down,
non reading adult society is much easier to influence and control than an
alert, well educated principled population who have been schooled in
history, classical literature, a foreign language, grammar, and have an
understanding of their moral civic responsibilities. Education should inspire
us how to think, not what to think – we have not learned if we merely
regurgitate information on command. Our education should motivate us to
scrutinize data, evaluate evidence, make comparisons and make appropriate
application.
A principled population, not seeking government entitlements, would also

demand responsible, principled leaders. Independent personal study after
high school or college, beyond readily accessible information, requires time
and is not effortlessly available to overtaxed individuals attempting to keep
their heads above water in an economically depressed society. Yes, despite
official contradictory claims, we are not merely depressed but bankrupt.
Obedience trained students read specific books, designed to produce

globalist convictions, introduce faith shattering alternative beliefs and create
distrust of traditionalism, but rarely read anything not required. Many
graduates never open a book after they leave school. They are satisfied to
read, if they are able, the newspaper headlines, People magazine or catch a
few “news” shows on television. After all, why bother to read if one can
tune into some familiar pleasant personality disseminating the “news”?
People who do not read have no advantage over those who cannot read.
Thus, ignorance, definitely not bliss but rather intellectually lethal, is
unfortunately ubiquitous.
Current classrooms, as well as life in general, are chaotic. Reasonable

discipline and mutual respect are absent. Moral relativism has replaced the
moral compass of our Judeo-Christian foundation. Anything related to that
foundation has been legally altered and unfortunately legalization gives
credibility to decadence. Judges, who have falsely sworn to protect and
abide by the Constitution, have verbally manipulated that foundational
document into oblivion. They are globalists, sympathizers, or fellow
travelers who trade principles for money, power or “just to get along.” It is
not coincidental! The evidence surrounds us: our drugged disrespectful
children cannot read, communicate without repetitive language laziness,
write intelligibly, calculate numbers without a calculator or spell without a
spell checker. It does not take a genius to acknowledge that there is
something horribly amiss with our children. A brief comparison with
previous generations provides justification for the obvious – the onslaught
against our youth carried out by the government’s educational system is
deviously deliberate. A spurious curriculum has been designed to inculcate
America’s children to function as the submissive workers of the One World
Order, compliments of the taxpayers.
Chester M. Pierce, Harvard University psychiatrist said the following at the

1973 International Education Seminar, as quoted in Educating For The New
World Order (June 1991), an excellent book by Beverly K. Eakman: “Every
child in America who enters school with an allegiance toward our elected
officials, toward our founding fathers, toward our institutions, toward the
preservation of this form of government... all of this proves the children are
sick, because the truly well individual is one who has rejected all of those
things and is what I would call the true international child of the future.”
There is certainly not a dearth of books that express views about America’s
dismal educational problems as well as the other associated problems that
affront our children. Another excellent, well researched and documented
book is the deliberate dumbing down of america (September 1999) by
educational whistle-blower Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt. This book is
available free as a PDF file. It remains Barnes and Noble’s #1 bestseller in
their History of Education category. Iserbyt is a former school board director
in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of
Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. During the first Reagan
administration Iserbyt was the Senior Policy Advisor working in the U.S.
Department of Education’s Office of Educational Research and
Improvement (OERI). She was instrumental in revealing a “major
technology initiative which would control curriculum in America's
classrooms.
A huge educational modification gradually occurred – America went from

an academic education (1880–1960) to a values education (1960–1980) to a
workforce training “education” (1980–2000). In Iserbyt’s book “the case is
made that the values education period was critical to the transformation of
education. It succeeded in persuading (brainwashing? duping?) Americans
into accepting the belief that values were transient, flexible and situational—
subject to the evolution of human society. Brave new values were integrated
into curricula and instruction. The mind of the average American became
‘trained’ (conditioned) to accept the idea that education exists solely for the
purpose of getting a good paying job in the global workforce economy.”
This isn’t just about your own children. Everyone should thoroughly read
her comprehensive book as well as the other books available on this
important issue. See a list below.
The federal government should not be dictating curriculum. Local property

taxes pay for schools but they have been seduced into accepting additional
funds which always include federal regulations, policies and programs
including Bush’s “No Child Left Behind.” This is nothing but a disguised
UNESCO school to work program, a detriment to America’s children, her
greatest resource.
Following is a much abbreviated timeline from Iserbyt’s must read book

revealing tax-exempt financial backing and government compliance in the
collapse of America’s educational system:
1902
The General Education Board (GEB) was incorporated by an act of the
United States Congress. Approved January 12, 1902, the General Education
Board was endowed by Mr. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., for the purpose of
establishing an educational laboratory to experiment with early innovations
in education.
1905
The Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) was founded in New York City
by Upton Sinclair, Jack London, Clarence Darrow and others. Its permanent
headquarters were established at the Rand School of Social Studies in 1908
and ISS became the League for Industrial Democracy (LID) in 1921. John
Dewey became president of the League for Industrial Democracy in 1939.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching was founded.

1906
National Education Association (NEA) became a federally chartered
association for teachers under the authority of H.R. 10501.
1908
Italian educator, the late Maria Montessori (1870–1952), developed a
method of teaching—relying on guidance and training of senses rather than
more rigid control of children’s activities—which would be very influential
throughout the rest of the century.
The Montessori Method was published in 1912 and much of Montessori’s

work was printed by the Theosophical Publishing House.
Elizabeth Clare Prophet, the cultic head of the Church Universal and
Triumphant, founded a group called Montessori International, and previous
U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Robert Muller, the celebrated author of the
New Age World Core Curriculum, claimed that the Montessori Method was
one of the educational programs which would greatly benefit global children
for the New Age.
1913
Frederick T. Gates, director of charity for the Rockefeller foundation, set up
the Southern Education Board (SEB), which was later incorporated into the
General Education Board (GEB), setting in motion “the deliberate dumbing
down of America.” Gates wrote The Country School of Tomorrow:
Occasional Papers No. 1 (General Education Board: New York, 1913)
1918
In the January 13, 1918 issue of New York World William Boyce Thompson,
Federal Reserve Bank director and founding member of the Council on
Foreign Relations applauded Russia for their “sweeping world changes”.
Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations planned the demise of traditional

academic education. Rockefeller’s focus would be national education;
Carnegie would be in charge of international education.
1919
“The Institute of International Education (IIE) was founded through a grant
from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The Institute’s
purpose was to operate a student exchange program. The U.S.-Soviet
Education Agreements were negotiated by the Carnegie Endowment’s
parent organization, the Carnegie Corporation, fostering exchanges of
curriculum, pedagogy and materials as well as students.”
“The Progressive Education Association (P.E.A.) was founded and

organized by John Dewey, even though he would not become a member in
its early years. P.E.A.’s goals and aims were projected for the last half of
this century at a board meeting held November 15–17, 1943 in Chicago,
Illinois.”
1921
The league for Industrial Democracy changed its name from the
Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) and stated its purpose as: “Education
for a new social order based on production and not for profit” (“A
Chronology of Education,” Dorothy Dawson, 1978).
Harold Rugg, writer of social studies textbook series entitled The Frontier
Thinkers (1921) published by the Progressive Education Association became
president of the National Association of Directors of Education Research
which would later become known as the American Educational Research
Association.
“The Council on Foreign Relations was established through the efforts of

Col. Edwin Mandell House. He was the initiator of the effort to establish this
American branch of the English Royal Institute of International Affairs.” …
“The late Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University described the
CFR as “a front for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very
small American Round Table Group.”
1922
On December 15 the Council on Foreign Relations endorsed world
government.
1925
The International Bureau of Education, formerly known as The Institute
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, was established with a grant from the Rockefeller
Foundation. The Bureau became part of the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
The following books, among many others, were published urging a New
World Order facilitated, in large part, by the American educational system:
“Toward Soviet America” by William Z. Foster, Head of the Communist
Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would
be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.
“The New World Order” by F. S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations

as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, “Nationality must
rank below the claims of mankind as a whole.”
“Dare the School Build a New Social Order?” by educator-author George

Counts who asserts that “the teachers should deliberately reach for power
and then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social
attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation. The growth of
science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must
be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, and trust in
Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of
social economy.”
“Humanist Manifesto” (1933) co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher

and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and
cooperative economic order.” Co-signer C. F. Potter said in 1930,
“Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American
public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
schools, meeting for an hour once a week; teaching only a fraction of the
children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?”
“The Teacher and World Government” (1946) written by former editor of

the “NEA Journal” (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan. He
says: “In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher
can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global
understanding and cooperation. At the very heart of all the agencies which
will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the
teacher, and the organized profession.”
“In 1940, teachers were asked what they regarded as the three major
problems in American schools. They identified the three major problems as:
Littering, noise, and chewing gum. Teachers last year were asked what the
three major problems in American schools were, and they defined them as:
Rape, assault, and suicide.”
William Bennett (1993)
Suggested Books:
America's Schools: The Battleground for Freedom By Allen Quist
Brave New Schools By Berit Kjos
Children No More: How We Lost a Generation By Brenda Scott
Cloning of the American Mind: Eradicating Morality through Education By
B. K. Eakman
History of American Education: From Harvard Scholars to Worker Bees of
the New World Order By Vaughn Shatzer
Mental Health Screening: How Will it Affect Your Children? By Dennis L.
Cuddy, Ph.D.
NEA Grab for Power By Dennis Cuddy, Ph. D.
Outcome-Based Education: The State’s Assault on Our Children’s
Values By Peg Luksik and Pamela Hobbs Hoffecker
Pokemon & Harry Potter: A Fatal Attraction By Phil Arms
Public Schools, Public Menace, How Public Schools Lie to Parents and
Betray Our Children By Joel Turtel
The Myth of ADHD And Other Learning Disabilities By Dr. Jan Strydom
and Susan duPlessis
Who’s Watching The Playpen? By David Benoit
Go to Part 6

Educating for the "New World Order", A Summary
They Told The Truth! ...About The New World Order
the deliberate dumbing down of america
the deliberate dumbing down of america, Introduction
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
Ibid, Chapter 2
An Expose of the New World Order
Ibid
Ibid
Ibid
Ibid
World News Stand, Education
also be included.
The New World Order, Deliberate Decline into Decadence

Part 6
By Deanna Spingola
2 June 2006
In conjunction with the deliberate dumbing down of America, the populace

has surreptitiously been indoctrinated to abhor, tolerate, and then embrace
the basest behavior in human sexuality. It is not coincidental that the raging,
rebellious, out-of-control, bra burning sixties followed the deliberately
decadent “research” of Alfred Charles Kinsey (1894-1956), a biologist and a
professor of entomology and zoology, given credibility by the Indiana
University in Bloomington. His insidious influence drastically affected
American culture and society.
Kinsey was brought up in a “strict churchgoing Methodist household where

dancing, tobacco, alcohol, and dating were forbidden.” He joined the Boy
Scouts at 17 and enjoyed camping and the other outdoor activities associated
with scouting, an interest he retained for years. He later claimed that
“adolescent homosexuality is a common phenomenon.” Whether this claim
is a result of observation or participation is unknown. He went from
agnosticism to atheism by the time he turned 26 – if God does not exist then
neither does morality and right and wrong.
In 1914 he entered Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine, initially
affiliated with the Congregational Church. In 1916 “Kinsey was elected to
Phi Beta Kappa and graduated magna cum laude with degrees in biology and
psychology. Charles Darwin was such a major influence that Kinsey quoted
him in his commencement address when he graduated from Bowdoin.
Kinsey continued his graduate studies at Harvard University's Bussey

Institute, “a hotbed of Darwinism and the ‘New Biology’ that led scientists
to envision improvement of the human species through ‘eugenics’.” Bussey
Institute “had one of the most highly regarded biology programs in the
United States… Kinsey was granted a Sc.D. degree in 1919 by Harvard
University.” During his time at Harvard, Kinsey was active with the Bethany
Boys’ Club. Kinsey preferred the company of boys and continued camping
with younger males past college graduation.
Kinsey became a big proponent of Aldous Huxley and his brother Julian, a
geneticist and the first director-general of UNESCO (United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). Aldous Huxley wrote
Brave New World (1932), required reading in many American schools. “It is
often misunderstood as ‘science fiction,’ but was actually an exposé of the
cosmopolitan eugenic vision of state-controlled free love and selective
breeding.” Those who embraced the eugenics movement felt nothing but
contempt for Judeo Christian beliefs. Unfortunately, “non-admiring”
individuals researching the foundations of Kinsey’s personal and
professional attitudes are not permitted entrance into the Kinsey Institute
archives. There are apparently many secrets that lay hidden from public
scrutiny in those archives.
A Kinsey biographer said that he was “one of the scholarly pre-World War
II eugenicists who issued a ‘terrifying’ call for the mass sterilization of
‘lower level’ Americans and a breeding plan for superior classes.” Not
surprisingly, Margaret Sanger (1879-1966), a eugenicist and the founder of
Planned Parenthood (population control) also believed that the lower classes
should not be allowed to have children even if that meant sterilization. “The
Margaret Sanger Papers Project is supported by the National Endowment for
the Humanities, the National Historical Publications and Records
Commission, and such private foundations as the Rockefeller Foundation,
the Ford Foundation, and the Samuel Rubin Foundation, among others.” The
Rockefeller Foundation and others support population control for the rest of
us.
In 1920 Kinsey joined the Department of Zoology at Indiana University in
Bloomington as an assistant professor. Once there, he joined a faculty
discussion group whose friendship and support helped him to overcome
some controversy later.
Despite a misogynistic attitude and frequently abusive treatment toward

women, he married Clara Bracken McMillen, a chemistry student at Ohio
State, after a casual, platonic relationship. They married on June 3, 1921 and
spent their honeymoon on an all weather camping trip, climbing mountains
and eating trail foods. They had four children, the first of which died at a
young age. Clara and Alfred Kinsey, along with their surviving children,
attended church and gave every indication of being a respectable,
conservative, average Midwestern family.
While camping as a professor, he was quite comfortable parading around

camp in the nude and participating in community baths with his male
students. “Kinsey seemed totally oblivious to sexual taboos…as though he
was determined to flaunt them…Kinsey had become a sexual
rebel…manipulative and aggressive, a man who abused his professional
authority and betrayed his trust as a teacher.”
Kinsey, who had gathered sexual data since 1935, aggressively created
interest in a prospective human sexuality class through his controversial
lectures. Eager students, future teachers and leaders allegedly petitioned the
University to offer this class which he began teaching in 1938. Its popularity
increased with each semester despite some justified general objections from
other faculty members. However, “Indiana University marketed Kinsey, the
free-sex crusader, as a disinterested scholar in an attempt to pacify Kinsey’s
colleagues and the public.” For whatever reason, the University president,
Herman Wells, unmarried and living at home with his mother
“enthusiastically approved Kinsey’s proposals for everything.”
In his classes, Kinsey promoted biological information devoid of any moral,

legal or ethical instruction. He apparently had the same mentality as Magnus
Hirschfeld, a professed homosexual, who headed the Institute for Sexology
in Berlin, Germany. Hirschfeld was an active proponent of abortion, gay
rights, and feminism and a participant in a global sexology movement which
demanded worldwide elimination of prudish sex laws and sexual repression.
Kinsey, an alleged Midwestern family man would prove to be a deceptively
acceptable advocate of the same social, cultural suicide that Hirschfeld was
disseminating in Germany.
Kinsey came to the attention of the Rockefeller Foundation which

earmarked funds for sex “research.” The National Research Council and the
Medical Division of the Rockefeller Foundation provided thousands of
dollars towards studies in sexual physiology and behavior. The Rockefeller
Foundation initially helped to organize and fund the American Social
Hygiene Association in 1913 to alter public attitudes regarding prostitution,
and to work for birth control and other social reforms. During the 1920s
faulty research, designed to satisfy a specific agenda, was produced by
Margaret Mead and others “while misleading the West with effusive claims
about the supposedly positive, happy nature of wildly promiscuous
‘primitive’ sexuality.”
Herman Wells, the president of Indiana University was in attendance in New

York when the Rockefeller Foundation celebrated its prestigious fiftieth
anniversary in 1963. For five full decades they had made important research
grants that greatly impacted society. Dr. Robert S. Morison, head of the
Medical Division of the Foundation explained to Wells, when asked, that the
reason he was invited was because of the wide spread influence of Kinsey’s
work which now appeared in the newest and best gynecology book for
medical students. “You’re here because we consider the Institute financing
one of the most significant things we ever did.”
Kinsey, along with specially selected individuals – no prudes, no Christians,

no females, began conducting surveys consisting of 350 questions,
supposedly approved by the Indiana University Board of Trustees. These
“research” assistants had to divulge their sexual history to determine their
attitudes. Individuals who expressed negative attitudes towards premarital or
extramarital intimacy, homosexuality, or relations with animals were not
hired. Project secrecy, a source of power and/or blackmail, was essential in
the ostensibly embarrassing sexual surveys which would currently constitute
an invasion of privacy or worse – sexual harassment.
Those interviewed were purportedly randomly chosen, ordinary individuals.

However, in order to skew the survey results to facilitate his agenda, the
Kinsey group “resorted to reclassifying prostitutes as married women.” In
addition, most women would be reticent to reveal such personal information.
Obviously, this skewed the research results to accommodate that specific
agenda. Other major irregularities should also be noted:
• Kinsey interviewed imprisoned sex offenders and portrayed them as

normal
• Kinsey’s tactics included “unethical, possibly criminal, observations

of children”
• Kinsey and cohorts classified 1,400+ criminals and sex offenders as

normal
• Kinsey sought out the worst sex offenders avoiding the more common
offenses such as statutory rape
• Kinsey professed interviewing many thousands more men than he did
• His scientific methodology was flawed – he only used the data that fit
his hypothesis
• Kinsey and cohorts rejected anyone who had not experienced some
form of sexual perversion
• Kinsey included so-called feebleminded subjects from the Michigan

State Training School
• All the subjects were portrayed as average no matter their

“unconventional” behavior
• Clandestine homosexuality is relatively commonplace
• Most normal Americans hypocritically and secretly engage in illicit

sex
• People are commonly bisexual
• Prejudice against homosexuality is hypocritical and based on

ignorance
Kinsey’s notorious books referred to as reports are a result of the imbalanced

sex surveys: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual
Behavior in the Human Female (1953). “For Kinsey, ‘normal’ was a non-
word, as were ‘criminal’ and ‘crime’ … the terms ‘love’ and ‘childbirth’ do
not appear in the indices.” Kinsey also rejected the idea of “motherhood” as
a legitimate, average aspiration. Kinsey produced spurious statistics of
babies born out of wedlock. Otherwise the amoral Kinsey and cohorts didn’t
define the very serious consequences of irresponsible, depraved behavior –
one of the most profound – loss of one’s soul.
It is of interest that Hugh Hefner also published a book Playboy in 1953.

Hefner provided generous financial support through his Playboy Foundation
for the Kinsey Institute. One can only imagine the kinds of projects this
foundation supports. Apparently each had their own targeted audience
designed to tear society apart with an “anything goes” mentality. The trash
they produced changed the mutual respect that the genders previously
expressed for each other. It promoted crimes against the vulnerable,
influenced the lonely, destroyed faith, and promoted pervasive flawed
information that indoctrinated the masses. For what – money, fame? Money
at the expense of morality!!
Kinsey’s books immediately created shock and outrage. “They challenged

conventional beliefs about sexuality and because they discussed subjects that
had previously been taboo. The belief that heterosexuality and abstinence
were both ethical and statistical norms had never before been seriously
challenged.” No matter the initial reactions – Kinsey’s noxious notions
received Madison Avenue mass media acceptance.
“The Rockefeller Foundation believed that the media constituted a uniquely

powerful force in modern society for imposing the will of the elite on the
masses. Secret psychological war projects to control public opinion were
supported by America’s tax-exempt foundations. For example, campaigns
were developed to induce Americans to support U.S. entry into World War
II.”
Kinsey’s “research” results were compatible with Rockefeller’s New World

Order goal of changing “America’s way of life” – altering “breeding
patterns”, respect for life and the sanctity of marriage and family. Kinsey
contended that there was pervasive promiscuity throughout America in the
late 1940s and early 1950s. There wasn’t – it would take a few decades for
his influence to permeate the media the schools, and stealthily filter into
America’s homes.
There were massive advertisements, free advance copies directed at the
medical profession, and wining and dining of journalists. The publicity was
designed to create a spontaneous clamor and curiosity for the books possibly
similar to the same buildup for Dan Brown's book and movie – The Da
Vinci Code. Well known journalists and personalities endorsed and therefore
lent credibility to Kinsey’s sexual philosophies which made them palatable
to the public and led to manipulated mass purchases. W. B. Saunders, a very
well known medical publisher, authenticated the books by publishing them.
In 1946, The Rockefeller Foundation began providing funds for “library”

activities such as Kinsey’s production of very explicit films which soon
found their way into medical schools. This activity became so important that
a sophisticated photographic laboratory with a full time photographer was
hired – all compliments of the Rockefeller Foundation. “Vernon Mark, a
professor at Harvard Medical School, noted that the introduction of
pornographic films into medical training, and the unwholesome influence of
the films on individual doctors and the profession as a whole, was brought
about by Kinsey. Physicians had traditionally been a highly respected class
of spokesmen for sexual conservatism. Kinsey’s obscenity training served to
erode that standard.”
After Kinsey died, his close associate Wardell Pomeroy took charge of The
Sex and Drug Forum, later called the Institute for the Advanced Study of
Human Sexuality (IASHS) located in San Francisco. This organization
spews forth the same decadent, culture destroying refuse that the Kinsey
Institute did. It is the “leading institution in the sexology field (controlling
conference selections, journal publications, lectures, etc.) IASHS has trained
more than 100,000 sex educators, doctors and ‘safe sex’ instructors.” After
learning about desensitization (eradication of inhibitions) through a program
like SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) they are teaching this nation’s
children unless parents have opted to home-school and save their offspring
from nefarious programs like “No Child Left Behind.” The mass media has
gradually desensitized anyone foolish enough to watch and/or read it day
after day.
Then there is SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the

United States) which was initially funded by the Playboy Foundation. Were
parents given an opportunity to evaluate any of the data or corporate
connections? Do parents know that some of the same people who worked
with Kinsey sit on the SIECUS Sex Education Curriculum Board? Just
exactly what have they been teaching your children? Unfortunately, teachers
who have also been influenced by this so-called credible “research” spend
more hours influencing children than a lot of parents do.
Pomeroy explains that Kinsey’s “grand scheme” was to move “American

society from its traditional moral standard based on marriage, to one
predicated on ‘free love’. Images intended to promote and legitimize deviant
behaviors were critical to this moral and cultural conversion.” He has
attained a large measure of success – Our moral decline is not a coincidence
but a devilish design. Rampant immorality tarnishes our national character.
One does not have to look hard to discover the cause and effect surge of
homosexuality, pervasive illicit sexual activity, loss of peace, self esteem,
innocence, and self discipline often followed by physical consequences such
as abortion, illness and death.
Kinsey’s books, data, fetid films, and his despicable amoral, totally
insensitive brutal behavior and utter disrespect for others are
unconscionable. He did not merit the title of scientist but brings dishonor to
those engaged in true scientific research for the benefit of mankind. He was
nothing more than an educated complicit, compromised sexual
predator/criminal that was bent on bringing others down to his hellish level
of perversity and immorality while destroying the basic unit of society – the
family. And, unfortunately, his influence has outlived him.
“What is liberty without wisdom and without virtue? It is the greatest of all
possible evils, for it is folly, vice, and madness, without restraint…”
Edmund Burke
Go to Part 7
Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. 2nd Edition, Revised &
Expanded 1998, 2000, p. 4. This is a must-read book that will open anyone’s eyes to what
has occurred in America.
Ibid, p. 8
Alfred Kinsey, Wikipedia
Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., 5
Ibid, p. 5
Ibid, p. 5
The Margaret Sanger Papers Project
Robbing the Cradle: The Rockefellers’ Support of Planned Parenthood
Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., p. 10
Ibid, p. 25
Ibid, p. 25
Ibid, p. 23
Ibid, p. 28
Ibid, p. 80
Ibid, p. 31
Ibid, p. 52-60
Ibid, p. 94
Ibid, p. 65
Kinsey Reports
Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., p. 38
Ibid, p. 79
Ibid, p. 80
Ibid, p. 83
also be included.
The New World Order, the Military Minions

Part 7
By Deanna Spingola
3 June 2006
Full implementation of a one world government requires the annihilation of

all defiant governments in conjunction with the establishment of central
banks controlled by the international banking elite. Proponent Madeleine
Albright, while Secretary of State, said: “If we have to use force, it is
because we are America. We are the indispensable nation.” While sounding
arrogant and ego-driven, the enforced establishment of the New World
Order depends on our duplicitous military involvement for we are the
military minions of the powerful elite. To garner popular acceptance for
offensive invasions, those nations that resist the globalist agenda
automatically become America’s enemies and are labeled Communists,
Marxists or whatever.
“When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after

suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic; and use the prestige of
anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind
constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already
have a bad smell.”
Communist Party to its U.S. members, 1943
If political infiltration fails, with properly installed puppets, then military

intervention for contrived explanations must suffice. Various subversive
tactics include “shock and awe” invasion, armed occupation, economic
sanctions or collapse, and cultural, social and religious decimation
perpetuated overtly by our super power military or covertly by our super
secret CIA. The major function of secrecy in Washington is to keep the U.S.
citizens ignorant, to keep them from knowing what their leaders are doing.
“Secrecy is power. Secrecy is license. Secrecy covers up mistakes. Secrecy
covers up corruption.”
“Extrapolating the figures as best we can, there have been about 3,000 major
covert operations and over 10,000 minor operations, all illegal, and all
designed to disrupt, destabilize, or modify the activities of other countries.”
The targets of CIA destabilization have included, but are not limited to, the
following countries: Grenada, Jamaica, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador,
Honduras, Panama, Iraq and Vietnam. Would they still be third world
without our subversive economic destabilization efforts?
So please, despite cheerleader Laura Ingraham’s assertions, and other

propaganda parrots, WE ARE NOT FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM IN
IRAQ!!!! We won our freedom over two hundred years ago. Since that time
we have fought in sixteen acknowledged wars. Our military has entered
other countries for the purpose of influencing foreign governments about
200 times. It has never been about our freedom. The only entity attempting
to deprive us of that hard won freedom appears to be our own government
with monstrosities like the Patriot Act which defines the innovative crime of
“domestic terrorism.” New laws will further criminalize political protest and
dissent, impacting our freedom of speech. Many, including ex-military men
are hesitant to speak for fear of the certain negative consequences to their
reputations and pensions. “We are living in a world in which nobody is free,
in which hardly anybody is secure, in which it is almost impossible to be
honest and to remain alive.” George Orwell
It is the presidents, the kings and other leaders, driven by the international
bankers and their goals, abetted by the press, who inflame the compliant
citizens to go into battle against people who allegedly have harmed us or
who might harm us. Since our wars with Great Britain, the battles waged by
America have been offensive. Even our retaliation against Japan was the
result of the contrived and provoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Our wars,
police actions, deposing dictators and concealed CIA interventions have
always been for economic reasons – to enrich the bankers who typically
fund both sides of the conflict.
“Beware of the leader who bangs the drums of war to whip the citizenry into
patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both
emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums have
reached fever pitch, and the blood boils with hate and the mind is closed, the
leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry, rather, the
citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of
their rights unto the leader, and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I
have done. And I am Caesar ---Gaius.”
Acquiescent Americans have been seduced by pro war propaganda. Our

super power status has metastasized into a “police the world” super ego
mentality that we apparently applaud with our voices and our tax dollars.
Our pride precludes any premonitions about our own demise. Previous
empires fell because of decadence and corruption – do we claim immunity to
a similar collapse? Wake up people! Close the TV Guide and read.
“In their day to day lives, in their immediate physical environment, most
Americans have no discernable enemies. It is always possible that there
could be governments and other organizations that pose a genuine physical
threat to the American people. However, it is virtually impossible for the
people to know this for themselves. They must depend almost entirely upon
information provided by government and the mainstream media.”
“In all of human behavior, what can be more serious than supporting acts of
violence against people in faraway places? Or for that matter, at home! Is
there not a profound, moral responsibility to be absolutely sure of both the
accuracy and urgency of the situation before perpetrating acts of death and
destruction upon other human beings? How difficult does this become when
one is at the mercy of sources of information that cannot be verified? What
if those sources have lied to you at other times and on other issues, and you
know it? What if both intuition and available facts tell you that your
government has not only been lying to you, but may have been involved in
creating the very danger it now says will require the use of violence? Is it
morally justifiable to support your government’s acts of violence against
people anywhere when:
1) You are not in immediate physical danger
2) You feel strongly that you cannot trust your government
3) You have no way to verify the information the government is

providing as its excuse for violence?”
From infancy, Americans are media conditioned to glorify war as a patriotic

obligation. After years of viewing desensitizing violent multi media
marketing disseminated as entertainment, naïve Americans are ready and
willing to “fight for their country.” By graduation, seniors, who lack
experience and real world awareness, are prime enlistment targets. After all
the “good guys” should do everything possible to defeat the “bad guys” even
if goes against individual, family, religious and moral values, right?
The government will proficiently train enthusiastic recruits, after instilling

strict discipline, to use guns, knives, land mines, bombs, napalm, cruise
missiles, smart bombs, cluster bombs and white phosphorous in order to kill
or maim strangers – men, women and children, often referred to as collateral
damage. After utilizing their expert killing skills during active duty they are
supposed to compartmentalize their horrific experiences and proceed
psychologically and emotionally as if nothing had ever happened.
Not only do we qualify our own, we have trained some of the most sadistic
people on the planet. “We set up schools and eventually trained tens of
thousands of military and police officers in countries all over Latin and
Central America, in Africa in three cases (Zaire, Ethiopia, and to a lesser
extent in Uganda), and in Asia.” These students were educated in
“techniques of population control, repression, and torture. … In some cases,
former Nazi officers from Hitler’s Third Reich were used as instructors.”
“U.S. Special Operations Forces trained 9,100 foreign soldiers in the 208
JCET (Joint Combined Exchange Training) exercises. Under the IMET
(International Military and Education Training) program, U.S. forced trained
3,454 foreign forces, nearly all officers.” Drug trafficker Manuel Noriega
and Roberto D’Aubuisson, “architect of El Salvador’s right-wing death
squad network” graduated from The School of the Americas (SOA), one of
150 such training facilities.
One of our government’s major areas of training has been in the use of
torture. When training films proved inadequate, beggars were rounded up as
“instructional guinea pigs.” One such agonized instructional model received
excruciating torture for over two years before international protests secured
her release. One of America’s foremost torture teachers was Dan Mitrione,
“a stable family man, a devout Catholic, a devoted father… yet he had
dedicated his life to torturing people, some of whom he knew were innocent
of any crime, because his society had agreed that there was something sacred
about ‘national security’ that it transcended all humane considerations. It
justified even torture.” Just how much evil has been perpetrated under the
ambiguous term “national security”?
To facilitate foreign torture our government issued over 350 export licenses
from September 1991 to December 1993 “worth more than $27 million for
‘saps, thumb-cuffs, thumb-screws, leg-irons, shackles and handcuffs …
strait jackets, plastic handcuffs. These were issued for 57 countries, many of
them with poor human rights records. In addition, over 2,000 licenses were
issued for 105 countries under another export category, which combined
electro-shock batons and cattle prods with shotguns and shells.” The next
time you feel outraged by news of state authorized torture somewhere please
keep in mind that our CIA probably provided the first-class training and that
our government licensed the exportation of the torture equipment.
Torture is incompatible to our rhetorical history of espousing human rights

and our current claims of compassionate concern for the Iraqis. But I
suppose as long as this vile practice is concealed we can still maintain the
appearance of Christian civility among the misinformed. The tortured are
well aware of the source. “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of
atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for
not even hearing about them.” George Orwell
Our technology has surpassed our humanity. Our arsenals are overflowing to
the point that we supply the arms or munitions to the entire world. “From
1989 to 1996 the U.S. sold more than $117 billion of arms, about 45 percent
of the global total.” In a ten year period of time the world-wide arms
business jumped from 16 percent to 63 percent. “U.S. arms dealers sell $10
billion in weapons to non-democratic governments each year.” “In 1986 the
United States accounted for 13 percent of worldwide arms exports, but by
1995 the market was 70 percent, most “to developing nations, many with
fragile autocracies that are easily destabilized”
Interesting Facts:
• Between 1993-1997 we sold or gave $190 billion in weapons to every

nation on earth
• Non-democratic Eritrea and Ethiopia fought each other using U.S.

arms and training
• Opponents Greece and Turkey are two of America’s biggest arms

customers
• U.S. military support was provided to 168 nations in 1998
• U.S. arms sales doubled during Clinton’s first year in office
• Five nations received over $1 billion in U.S. military support in 1997:

Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey and Egypt
• Sixteen nations received over $100 million in military support
• Of the 53 armed forces in Africa, 41 received U.S. military training
• Of the eleven nations intervening in the civil war in the Congo in

1998, nine received U.S. arms and training in 1997
• Since 1990 the government has given away more than $8 billion
worth of surplus equipment from U.S. military stocks including 4,000
tanks, 500 bombers and 200,000 light arms to Bahrain, Colombia,
Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Peru and Turkey
• Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest arms maker, is selling
sophisticated fighter airplanes and air defense systems to at least 21
nations
• The United States spends more on arms annually than the rest of the
Security Council combined
• The U.S. has more nuclear bombs, chemical and biological weapons,
aircraft, rockets and delivery systems than the rest of the combined
world
• We have troops stationed at over 395 major military bases in over 35

countries
“The last five times U.S. troops were sent into conflict, they found
themselves facing adversaries who had previously received U.S. weapons,
military technology, or training.”
Killing is more profitable than using our God-given genius to enrich and
edify mankind – we use swords rather than plows. The resources of the
world “are enough and to spare” but the power hungry use those resources to
garner control over the souls of men to bind them with “the awful chains of
hell.” There is something drastically wrong when an allegedly Christian
nation that kills over 45 million innocent citizens in the name of women’s
rights and wages preemptive wars against defenseless nations in the name of
spreading or establishing democracy, protecting our national security,
toppling previously installed CIA dictators or some other noble-sounding,
trumped-up justification. Our military superiority alleviates all competition –
recall Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
“People have not been horrified by war to a sufficient extent ... War will
exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same
reputation and prestige as the warrior does today.” John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Go to Part 8
Derailing Democracy by David McGowan, p 167

The Praetorian Guard by John Stockwell, former CIA official, South End Press, p. 71
Ibid, p 70
Ibid, p. 52
The Myth of the Innocent Civilian by Harold Thomas, 2002, p 36
Ibid, p 36
Ibid, p 61
Ibid, p 74
Derailing Democracy by David McGowan, p 91
Ibid, p 92
The Praetorian Guard by John Stockwell, former CIA official, South End Press, p. 76
Derailing Democracy by David McGowan, p. 169
Ibid, p 95
Ibid, p 96-97
Ibid, p 166
Ibid, p 99
also be included.
The New World Order, Weapons of Mass Inhumanity

Part 8
By Deanna Spingola
10 June 2006
There have been many contrived justifications to goad Americans into

spilling their blood and their money for war: the explosion on the Maine,
Pearl Harbor which our government knew about and allowed to happen, the
Tonkin Bay incident which we now know didn’t happen as stated, and most
recently 9-11, a veritable shock and awe illustration that terrorists, those
“evil-doers” are out to get America. This crisis, also known as a conflict, had
nothing to do with the citizens of Afghanistan or Iraq but official statements
thru the official Ministry of Truth television networks CBS, ABC, CNN,
NBC and FAUX, repeated over and over and over, combined just the right
words: WMDs, terrorists and Saddam Hussein did just the trick and I do
mean trick!!!
David Rockefeller said: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All
we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World
Order.” So David was 9-11 the “right” major crisis or are there others
planned that might be more right? Should we avoid tall outdated, well-
insured buildings?
The Vietnam anti-war movement is another example of an orchestrated

opposition tactic. Some anti-war activists are government plants who are
also known as CIA assets. They attract followers and get a mountain of press
– intentionally negative to suggest that they are non-supportive and
completely unpatriotic. Any anti-war movement, including the current one,
though entirely justified, creates division. Media attention is useful in
developing hatred towards skeptics like Cindy Sheehan. Whether they are
paid assets or merely function as useful idiots, they are labeled unpatriotic –
along with John Murtha. Combined with the media, they actually serve the
pro-war agenda. If the anti-war mentality equals disloyalty, the mass
majority will support the war which is the goal of the orchestrated
opposition. Insiders, assets or new world order proponents, like Hanoi Jane,
finish their activist stint, attain a level of respectability, make movies,
produce work-out tapes, marry other insiders, or like John Kerry, become
politicians in Massachusetts.
The government has always provided enemies and justifications for war:
“Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written
approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying
refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent
terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People
would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be
hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus
giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and
international backing, they needed to launch their war.”
What a conspiracy to motivate us into war! It is a typical technique.

“We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous
conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious
lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away
from the guilty.” George W. Bush, speaking before the UN General
Assembly 11/10/2001
With the Bush administration and every previous administration – truth

becomes whatever lies they can get away with. Liars need excellent
memories, unless of course one is a politician. Then it is the public that
requires communal recollection. “The simple step of a courageous individual
is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Russian writer, Soviet dissident, was imprisoned
for 8 years for criticizing Stalin in a personal letter. The comfort zone of
conformity keeps the masses ignorant and pliable. Majority belief, however
sincere, is not assurance of verity. It is quite the opposite!
Financial benefits follow military destruction via reconstruction by multi-

billion dollar no-bid contracts. Follow the money! War is always about
money. Therefore profitless peaceful alternatives are never an option. The
Global War on Terror is a big farce based on an event as contrived as the
Operation Northwoods plan.
The shameful intimacy between government and the military industrial

complex results in legislatively approved mass killing for profit. While other
countries concentrate on building infrastructure and exportable products we
focus on weapons buildup in preparation for preemptive invasion or defense
against bogeymen enemies of our own creation. This military buildup,
started during the Reagan administration, results in enormous financial
benefits for international military contractors. The citizens of other countries
are manufacturing computers, cars, televisions and other life-enhancing
commodities while we are producing weapons of mass inhumanity. Japan
and Germany, creditor nations, are technologically advanced, enjoy better
health, have a manufacturing base, do not have trade imbalances, and use
their resources to benefit and feed their own citizens.
Our massive military budget, the biggest in the world, is funneled directly
into the pockets of government connected companies like the Carlyle Group,
Halliburton, Root & Brown, Bechtel and others. The international bankers,
who control the puppet politicians, reap huge financial profits. Additionally,
the spoils of destabilization, offensive invasion, government infiltration and
war fall under the control of the victor. This includes all of the natural
resources, including the drug producing plants, of the vanquished country.
Drugs produce billions in laundered dollars.
How annoying that the Taliban disallowed poppy growth in favor of low
profit edibles. “Current cultivation levels equate to a potential production of
4,950 metric tons of opium. This represents a 239 percent increase in the
poppy crop and a 73 percent increase in potential opium production over
2003 estimates.” And we were told it was about their concealment of Osama
bin Laden who the government alleges was the mastermind behind 9/11,
despite the fact that the FBI recently acknowledged that it has no hard
evidence of his involvement.
“On September 20 2001, the Taliban offered to hand Osama bin Laden to a
neutral Islamic country for trial if the US presented them with evidence that
he was responsible for the attacks on New York and Washington. The US
rejected the offer.” Invasion was preferable – circulating drug currency is
much more profitable for the privileged elite than feeding Afghanis who
might be categorized, along with other disadvantaged third world
individuals, as “useless eaters.” “The widely held proposition that the major
cause of poverty throughout the world, and at the very least in the
undeveloped countries, is an excess of population.”
“The solution, then, is the euphemistically named ‘population control,’

which in essence is the use of government power to encourage, or compel,
restrictions on the growth, or on the numbers, of people in existence.”
“350,000 people will have to be eliminated every day in order to sustain the
planet. It's a terrible thing to say but somebody has to say it.” Dr. Jacques
Cousteau
Martin Luther King III, the eldest son of legendary civil rights leader Martin
Luther King Jr., said: “We all have to be concerned about terrorism, but you
will never end terrorism by terrorizing others.” More Americans die as a
result of automobile accidents, tobacco related illnesses, cancer and heart
disease than from terrorism. Then we must also consider the once healthy
U.S. non military citizens whose wellbeing has been compromised due to
exposure to the numerous New Mexico and Nevada desert detonations of
nuclear weapons.
Population decreasing wars are designed to enhance presidential ratings –
Bush Sr., role model for son George, used this device in Panama and Iraq.
Wars also distract us from escalating domestic problems: a skyrocketing
deficit, decreasing standard of living, loss of our manufacturing base,
genuine environmental issues, collapse of the U.S. economy, and loss of
social services exacerbated by hoards of unrestrained illegal occupiers who
were invited into the country by Senor Bush as part of his guest worker
facade. Tenacious Mexicans will undoubtedly ultimately fill those positions
vacated by tired, wounded second and third tour of duty soldiers or those
sent home unceremoniously in body bags.
In conjunction with our wars our veterans face the very serious situation of
homelessness. They willingly agreed to “fight for our country” and face
possible death, but are quickly forgotten after their service. Apparently they
are viewed as spent cannon fodder whose worth is no longer of value.
Lacking marketable skills, opportunities and frequently suffering from war-
related illnesses, they easily fall into justifiable discouragement, alcoholism
and drug use. Whereas they used to fill the ranks of the military, they now
fill the ranks of the homeless. Our government ignores or disputes their
depleted uranium diseases caused by our use of dual-duty weapons created
from our nuclear waste.
Our government has known for years, since the Gulf War, that depleted
uranium, our nuclear waste, is deadly harmful to both our troops and those
we use it against. “The Preventive Psychiatry Newsletter has written to its
subscribers telling them that the real reason the former Veterans Affairs
Secretary, Anthony Principi, recently resigned was because he has been
involved in a massive scandal covering up the fact that Gulf War Syndrome
was caused by the use of depleted uranium, according to the SF Bay View.”
Despite this knowledge, along with substantial physical evidence and
grievances by those whose lives are permanently shattered, the pentagon
continues its use. The U.S. Army placed a $38 million order for more
depleted uranium tank shells the end of February. Yes, what a pity they
don’t warn our troops to give them the option of serving at their own risk, in
addition to be wounded or killed by the “enemy.” Surely, it must have been
just a government oversight?
Economic sanctions, another terrible inhumane tactic aimed at civilians,

became part of the U.N. Charter in 1945 as a method of control. Deliberately
depriving civilians of food and basic necessities until they are starving,
miserable, desperate or dead is unconscionable. Yet, sanctions have been
used fourteen times – twelve times since 1990.
This dreadful device says more about us than about our contrived enemies.
The Iraqis, nor others, will ever hear a shred of remorse for these
unforgivable crimes. The only mention of forgiveness had nothing to do
with America. Given our propensity for similar brutality it is apropos that
George H. W. Bush remarked: “Let’s forgive the Nazi war criminals.” He
also spoke of the impending war in 1991 with Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, the on
again/off again enemy, as a sign that the world was on the “threshold of a
New World Order.” That war began January 12, 1991, and supposedly
ended with a cease fire on February 22, 1991. In reality, it never ended. We
opportunistically bombed Iraq from 1991 onward, along with our other
offensive strategies.
Body of Secrets by James Bamford, Doubleday, 2001, p.82.

Liberty Tree
White House Press Release
Population "Control"
Ibid
Anti-war Quotes
Nevada Test Site
Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Tests see also: Fallout from Nuclear Weapons
DU Scandal Explodes
U.S. signs $38 million deal for depleted uranium tank shells
Cool War: Economic sanctions as a weapon of mass destruction by Joy Gordon, Harper’s
Magazine, November 2002
New York Times, April 14, 1990
How Both Bushs Attacked Iraq
also be included.
The New World Order, Weapons of Mass Inhumanity
Part 9
By Deanna Spingola
10 June 2006
In 1996 “Lesley Stahl asked the previous U.S. Ambassador to the United
Nations Madeleine Albright about the half million Iraqi children that died.
… “That is more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the
price worth it?” Not so bright Albright answered: “I think this is a very hard
choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it. “THE PRICE IS
WORTH IT?” Killing other people’s children would certainly provoke
anger. Apparently Albright and Powell, who was not concerned with civilian
numbers, have much in common.” In 1998, double-speak expert Albright
said: “I am willing to make a bet to anyone here that we care more about the
Iraqi people than Saddam Hussein does.”
Lacking humility, will we ever apologize to the parents of those 500,000

children who starved as a result of our sanctions? Quite the contrary, we
justify ourselves and claim that it was worth it: In addition, will we ever
apologize for the birth defects, accelerating cancers, or other toxic diseases
caused by our depleted uranium weapons of mass inhumanity?
We have not only lost our humanity, we have lost our humility, an accurate
perception of our relationship to God and the other people who inhabit an
increasingly contaminated earth. “Since the advent of the Nuclear Age,
everything has changed but the way people think, thus, we drift towards
unparalleled catastrophe.” Albert Einstein
Though understandable if it were the Iraqis, they did not perpetrate the
“shock and awe” of 9/11. Purportedly fifteen of the highjackers were from
the New World Order compliant, Bush family friendly Saudi Arabia which
consequentially makes them our allies. Perhaps that is also the reason we
could make fifteen of their citizens’ our patsies?
Shifting the blame for misery is affective. Wretchedness is the goal of

economic destabilization. We blamed the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and
Castro for the economic woes in Cuba. George H. W. Bush easily blamed
the serious post war health problems on Saddam Hussein. However, we
purposely destroyed their entire infrastructure, their electrical capacity and
their water supply which is egregious and completely against the Geneva
Convention. This is evidenced in a document dated 15 November 1991.”
The “art imitating life film” The Manchurian Candidate may enlighten us to
the farce trials of Moussaoui and Saddam Hussein.
Hussein killed Iraqi citizens. This also occurred during the time that he was
our CIA collaborator when our government installed him and then assisted
him in murdering thousands of the opposition; we even supplied the
munitions for his war with Iran. It is easy to gain acceptance for deposing a
tyrant by opportunistically publicizing their heinous atrocities against others
when it conveniently supports our own atrocious actions.
One puppet pundit, subtly attempting to associate Iraq with the events of
9/11, recently read the following on her talk radio show regarding the
skeletal remains found on the edge of the Ash Sham desert: “The man was
thrown backward by automatic weapons fire, his eyes blindfolded and his
arms tied behind his back, his skull jerked upward at the neck, his fleshless
mouth gaping, his two rows of teeth stretched apart, as though in a primal
scream.” And then she craftily compared this man’s evident horror to the
terror of those who jumped from the buildings on 9/11. Other hate-spewing
pundits are merciless in their evaluations of anyone, such as the 9/11
widows, who dares verbalize opposing opinions.
Do not be deceived; had Hussein been compliant, he would have remained

in power. Tyrants are absolutely tolerated if they are our tyrants and serve
the elite international banking interests. The war that cost billions, wreaked
havoc on our economy, decimated Iraq, destroyed the health of the Iraqis
and our military and took the lives of tens of thousands was really about the
unconsummated oil proposal between Rockefeller and Hussein.
But for propaganda purposes, the vanquished, toppled tyrants, actors, patsies
or whomever, face a tribunal or jury! And if a tribunal doesn’t work, air
strikes effectively silence the alleged accused, as well as make a point and
distract the masses. “Abu Musab Saddam Osama al-Zarqawi, the extremely
elusive if not entirely mythical terrorist mastermind responsible for every
single insurgent action in Iraq except for the ones caused by the red-tailed
devils in Iran or the stripy-tailed devils in Syria, has reportedly been killed in
an air strike in Hibhib, an area north of Baghdad, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri
Kamal al-Maliki announced Thursday.”
Just exactly why are we hated – it shouldn’t take a genius to figure that out?
The American government, without distinction to either political party, has a
lot to apologize for. We have become a giant propagandized war machine,
complete with all the unconstitutional, brutal, covert CIA style entities,
abuse-of-power presidential directives and the elimination of the majority of
all constitutional congressional responsibilities. Political power, pensions,
perks and other unprincipled payola are obviously exceptional. America is
the biggest bully in the world’s playground and big bullies rarely exhibit
regret or contrition.
We demand that other countries open their facilities for weapons

inspections. These countries would never rationally assault us – it would be
suicidal. The country which consistently uses weapons of mass inhumanity
on civilian populations is the United States. The United States has signed
international treaties, trashed in 2001, to halt the testing, manufacture and
development of chemical and biological weapons. Thus we are required to
allow United Nations inspectors to verify our compliance to the treaties. “In
defiance of the treaties' provisions, the United States Senate passed a bill in
1997 allowing the president to deny international inspections of U.S.
weapons facilities ‘on the grounds of national security.’”
A government that does not value the life of its own citizens yet claims to
demonstrate their compassion and concern by the “humanitarian bombing”
of a populace in a foreign nation thousands of miles away is practicing
extreme hypocrisy and devilish deceit. Unsurprisingly, governments
consistently lie, including our own. This is particularly true as we experience
the obvious farce of spreading democracy while consequentially killing
thousands of Iraqi citizens. There have been close to a million citizens
killed during the entire length of the Iraqi War. “There is only one way to
deal with people like this, and that is you have to kill some of them, even if
they are not directly involved in this thing.” Larry Eagleburger, appearing on
CNN, Sept. 12, 2001
“Since World War II, American military actions, in one form or another,
have caused more death and destruction around the world than have the
actions of any other country.” I understand that the government doesn’t
tabulate civilian deaths but the survivors do. Josef Stalin once remarked:
“One death is a tragedy, but a million deaths are merely a statistic.”
Orchestrated opposition enables a predetermined result. It is thesis versus

antithesis which results in synthesis, used repeatedly. The Establishment’s
goal (synthesis) is the New World Order. Opposition in all things is also a
gospel principle and is frequently cited as the purpose of our existence – to
experience tribulation in order to obtain strength through our diligence and
faith. Lucifer is apparently also familiar with the function of opposition but
applies it deceptively. Absent controlled conflict, this achievement could not
be met. The unplanned actions of individuals within any society would not
lead to this synthetic synthesis – it has to be created and highly calculated.
Enter the International Banking cabal (including American firms), always
receptive to mega profits at anyone’s expense. They have made billions in
blood money by backing the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North
Vietnam, and the list goes – all against the United States.
It is military musical chairs as the circumstances and the alleged villains

have changed and the orchestrated opposition continues under a variety of
justifications. The goal remains static: New World Order!!!! Making the
world “safe for democracy” is as old as Woodrow Wilson’s promise when
he led the United States into the First World War after attacks on American
ships. “The State Department reported that the number of ‘significant’
terrorist attacks reached a record 655 in 2004, up from 175 in 2003.”
Terrorism begets more terrorism! How long are the wealthy and their
minions going to use that double-speak justification for bloodshed and mass
murder? Democracy is rule by whoever has the weapons, the opportunity,
and the motives to bomb others into compliance and submission.
Nuclear bombs, formerly known as atomic bombs, made a huge statement to

the rest of the world. Towards the official end of World War Two and
months after the Japanese offered to surrender, we used atomic bombs on
the civilian population of two cities with a Christian majority. A small
military flight crew with a bomb is a highly efficient killing machine – more
so than ground troops. The official rationale for bombing instead of ground
troops was to save Americans lives. Apparently Japanese lives have less
value than American lives – what is the ratio, I wonder?
Collective guilt is much smoother to digest if one even acknowledges or

shares the responsibility of the actions of their rogue government despite the
fact that we finance those actions. Group-think is much safer and engenders
less culpability than independent thinking. Thinking “outside of the box”
takes one out of his/her comfort zone and might additionally bring criticism
or loss of status.
History is replete with tales of the conquering hoards who explore, discover,
confiscate and kill the citizens or merely leave them to die in desperate
poverty. The principles of exploitation are eternal. “Imperialism is an
institution under which one nation asserts the right to seize the land or at
least to control the government or resources of another people.” John T.
Flynn
There is a major difference between what happens to insiders and anyone

else: sports figures, some movie stars and politicians often remain unscathed
by their behavior. A commoner like John Walker Lindh was in the wrong
place at the wrong time and is serving time. Liar Martha Stewart served
time. Her biggest mistake is being an unconnected successful business
woman. Liar Sandy Berger, Clinton’s national security adviser (the very
height of irony), claimed to make an “honest mistake,” stole and then
destroyed government property (evidence), paid a fine but served no jail
time. Their lies were significantly different. But then, politicians lie
incessantly and only appear to suffer legal consequences when it serves the
Establishment’s purpose and/or to distract attention from foreign bombings
by the United States.
Give up reality television and recognize that concentration camps, a

censored press, a dictatorial secretive government, preemptive war against
non-threatening countries are all genuine reality. As a youth I was outraged
by what the Nazis did to the Jews and others. Why would the general
population allow the inhumane torture, death and destruction directed at the
citizens of their own country? Why did they invade Poland? My youthful
anger at the Germans for not standing up against governmental tyranny and
brutality was passionate, despite their claims of ignorance. How could they
not know? Why do Americans tolerate the same behavior from their
government?
George W. Bush remarked: “When I was coming up, it was a dangerous

world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us vs. them, and it was
clear who them was. Today, we are not so sure who the they are, but we
know they're there.” Well phrased, Mr. President! But, I think some of us
might have it figured out.
Go to Part 10
See Bush’s War of Terror, Genocide, Part 4 by Deanna Spingola

Ibid
Derailing Democracy by David McGowan, p. 181
Iraq: Assessment of Current Health Threats and Capabilities
Uncovering Iraq's Horrors in Desert Graves
Why the Intervention in Arabia?
This is More Necessary Propaganda
The Timely Death of al-Zarqawi
Associated Press, February 27, 1998, quoted from Derailing Democracy, by David
McGowan, (Common Courage Press, 2000), p.182
Antony c. Sutton, 2002, pg 115
Anti-war Quotes
Berger to Pay $50,000 Fine for Taking Papers
also be included.
The New World Order, the Ministry of Truth

Part 10
by Deanna Spingola
14 June 2006

Most of us are happy to have sufficient for our needs but with the elite,
enough is never enough. It isn’t simply resource accumulation but an
insatiable, obsessive demonic lust for power over others. Controlling others
necessitates an absolute infiltration into every area of our lives including the
source of our acquired knowledge and our perceptions about current events.
To facilitate this goal, a suspension of the First Amendment, specifically our
freedom of speech, is absolutely essential.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The First Amendment protects our freedom of speech and of the press.
Absent the First Amendment, protestors could be silenced, the press could
be censored, citizens could not criticize their government nor could they
organize for social change. No rational individual would readily relinquish
the vital freedoms of the First Amendment. But like the proverbial frog who
remains in incrementally heated water, the masses will slowly surrender all
of their freedoms without so much of a whimper. Some will even be relieved
and anxious to surrender the freedoms patriots died to gain. With hardly a
struggle or even majority acknowledgement, the allied elite have
progressively seized ownership or control of the media.
The “free” press has been seized by mega media owners who are “free” to
deliver mounds of distracting drivel camouflaged as news and information.
Objectivity has been replaced by restraint. Instead of receiving unbiased
information we are indoctrinated by the cultural, moral, economic and
globalist philosophies and falsehoods supported by the elite corporate
owners.
“In March 1915, the J. P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding and
powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men
high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most
influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to
control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.”
“These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers and
then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the
purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the
country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of
the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to
purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an
agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for
by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise
and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism,
financial policies, and other things of national and international nature
considered vital to the interests of the purchasers…”
“This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the

wishes of the interests served.”
Bernard Baruch, American financier, stock market speculator, statesman,

and presidential adviser, financially backed both newspapers and columnists.
Arthur Krock, a columnist for the Louisville Courier-Journal was under
Baruch’s influence and attended the Paris Peace Conference with Baruch
and Herbert Hoover in 1919. Baruch convinced Adolph Ochs, publisher of
the New York Times that he should hire Krock who reorganized the New
York Times Washington bureau in 1932.
In 1926 Baruch invested $50,000 to assist David Lawrence to found the

United States Daily, which became United States News and after World War
II USA News and World Report. Baruch also financed Maxwell Lincoln
Schuster and Dick Simon to form Simon and Schuster. Baruch also made
investments in Vogue, Vanity Fair, Raleigh News and Observer, Our World
Magazine and others.
Simon & Schuster grew to include seven divisions – the Simon & Schuster
Adult Publishing Group, Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing, Simon &
Schuster Audio, Simon & Schuster Online, Simon & Schuster UK, Simon &
Schuster Canada and Simon & Schuster Australia. Their imprints and brand
names include: Simon & Schuster, Scribner, Pocket Books, Downtown
Press, The Free Press, Atria, Fireside, Touchstone, Washington Square
Press, Atheneum, Margaret K. McElderrry, Aladdin Paperbacks, Little
Simon, Simon Spotlight, Simon Spotlight Entertainment, Star Trek, MTV
Books and Wall Street Journal Books.
Simon & Schuster published more than 2,000 titles annually. They have won
54 Pulitzer Prizes and have received numerous National Book Awards and
National Book Critics Circle Awards. They have published both Rush
Limbaugh’s and Howard Stern’s books.
Beginning in 1984, the company acquired more than 60 companies,

including Prentice Hall and Silver, Burdett, and culminated 1994 with the
acquisition of Macmillan Publishing Company. In 2002, Simon & Schuster
was integrated with the Paramount motion picture and television studios as
part of the Viacom Entertainment Group. “Effective December 31, 2005,
this corporate entity changed its name to CBS Corporation. The present firm
known as Viacom beginning December 31, 2005 is a new spin-off company
created during the CBS-Viacom split.”
A very comprehensive current list of media ownership is in the book

Censored 2006, Chapter 6. You can download this must-read chapter as a
PDF file. In 1985, there were 50 substantial media conglomerates in the
United States. Now there are ten top major media entities with connections
to government, higher education, major institutions, banking and corporate
America: AOL Time Warner, Walt Disney, Gannett, Viacom (now CBS
Corporation), New York Times, Washington Post, Knight-Ridder, The
Tribune Company, General Electric and News Corporation. “Media
corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other
large corporations, including banks, investment companies, oil companies,
health care and pharmaceutical companies and technology companies.”
The information contained in this file established a startling fact: media
owners and their editor minions act as the unelected, unaccountable
disseminators of all truth and information. They are free to distort,
misinform, and skew all information to their financial benefit without
repercussions because of their privileged government industry appointments
and swinging-door connections.
“Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western
World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One
would like to ask: by whom has it been elected, and to whom is it
responsible?” Alexander Solzhenitsyn
We can thank the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which was supposed to

facilitate competition. Instead it provided the big media companies to gobble
up and digest the smaller companies, increasing their monopolizing powers.
What a coincidence – a law that does the exact opposite of what was
intended.
Most of us believe that journalists have a particular responsibility to

investigate and then divulge the information that they discover. To do
otherwise is to perpetuate a facade of “reality” which is unconscionable and
irresponsible. Withholding vital information, particularly when considering
the election of our representatives, is grossly negligent and unfair to the
voters, perpetuates corruption, and squanders the lives of our own citizens as
well as foreigners. In addition the very destruction of our country may be an
imminent reality. The media has an obligation! The deliberate omission of
truth or the calculated commission of a lie defines the measure of an
individual’s integrity. It also denotes group integrity. “During times of
universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” George
Orwell
“There is no such thing in America as an independent press. You know it

and I know it. There is not one of you who dares write his honest opinions,
and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am
paid... for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper ... others of you are
paid similar salaries for similar things... any of you who would be so foolish
as to write his honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for
another job... We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes.
We are the jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents,
possibilities, and lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual
prostitutes.” John Swinton
It is incompatible to be dishonest in one area of one’s life and honest in

another. “Integrity comprises the personal inner sense of ‘wholeness’
deriving from honesty and consistent uprightness of character.” Values
should remain static, not situational or flexible.
However, standards and integrity no longer apply – the rules are flexible,
adjustable and situational to ensure that politicians, ethically-challenged
corporate executives and others can escape the consequences of those
annoying investigations by conscientious journalists.
Currently we witness news executives “groveling for public forgiveness

because something their reporters wrote offended powerful interests, or
raised uncomfortable questions about the past. Stories that meet every
traditional standard of objective journalism are retracted or renounced, not
because they are false – but because they are true.” Retractions, distortions
and omissions are rampant.
CNN/Time Warner retracted a report on the CIA operation known as

Tailwind at the request of a New York attorney, Floyd Abrams. Abrams
represented John Singlaub, a retired Army general who was the source of the
June 7, 1998 report that accused military of using nerve gas on Vietnam
War-era defectors in Southeast Asia in the 1970s. The lead reporter, Peter
Arnett, ultimately left the network. April Oliver, the gutsy CNN producer,
was fired and ended up suing the network who defamed her “Charging that
CNN retracted the 1998 story ‘to mollify the military establishment,’ Oliver
accused senior network executives of approving the substance and sourcing
of the explosive script, then surrendering to unfounded criticism after the
reports aired.” Oliver said she would have gone to prison to protect Singlaub
who she claims “smeared her to distance himself from the report.” The
Department of Defense (?) whitewashed the whole incident with a timely
news briefing on Tuesday, July 21, 1998.
This is from a Rumsfeld Department of Defense news briefing in February

2002: “Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always
interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are
things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is
to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also
unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know.” Do I detect
stalling double talk? Isn’t it frightening to realize we have such questionably
qualified people in leadership positions?
Investigative reporters are routinely fired or arrested for reporting on

government or corporate corruption perpetrated in other countries – against
foreign strangers who are desperately vulnerable. Reporters have been
forced to apologize and renounce their work. Afterwards, these
conscientious reporters are reviled and ruined. One reporter, Mike
Gallagher, was ruined as a result of his exposé of Chiquita Brands
International, a company known for their numerous CIA protected
exploitations in Central and South America. [] When money or politics are
affected, truth appears to be irrelevant. I suppose one could say that you can
buy anything in the world for money, including anonymity viewed as
permission – yet others like journalists, pay the very high cost, often their
lives, for the corruption and crimes of others.
Because of what amounts to imposed censorship, intimidation can induce

journalists to restrict their writing to the approved party line. Privileged
government status often tempts the wholly unprincipled to use that protected
position for personal financial enhancement or for illegalities that are rarely
revealed. And if exposed – just destroy the message by obliterating the
credibility of the messenger. Governments can and do commit crimes
against large segments of the population, foreign or domestic, without
exposure and culpability.
Unaccustomed to independent thinking, distracted and lazy minds are

susceptible to the improvised, official version of any propagandized
orchestrated crisis. Those same complacent mental captives who feel well
informed by snippets of “news” from the “Ministry of Truth” are
immediately willing to support premeditated government schemes or
legislation presented as excellent solutions. Rule by crisis increases Big
Brother government power, the bureaucracy, civil chaos and our gullibility
and fear – of government and whatever enemy they have currently devised
while rapidly decreasing our personal liberties, our savings accounts, our
pensions, our health and our jobs through constitutionally illegal trade
agreements.
“It is not enough to reconcile people more or less to our regime, to move
them towards a position of neutrality towards us, we want rather to work on
people until they are addicted to us.”
“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the
people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie.
It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to
repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by
extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State.” Dr. Joseph M.
Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of Nazi Germany. These statements could
easily be said by someone on the Faux Network today.
“In February 2003, A Florida Court Of Appeals unanimously agreed with an

assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying
the news in the United States.”
I will close with quotes from two very wise and honest men: “We are apt to
shut our eyes against a painful truth...for my part, I am willing to know the
whole truth; to know the worst; and to provide for it." - Patrick Henry and
“All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to
remain silent.” -- Thomas Jefferson
The Shadows of Power, The council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline by
James Perloff, p. 178-79
Ibid
Ibid
The Greatest Story Never Told by Pat Riott, pg. 163-66
SimonSays.com, Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Ibid
Viacom (1971-2005)
Interlocking Directorates
Quotes We Just Happen to Like
Editorial Freedom in Capital’s World
Integrity, Wikipedia
Censored 2006, Gary Webb, p. 10
Ibid
The Washington Post, May 8, 1999
DoD News Briefing - Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers, Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2002
American Journalism Review, September 1, 1998
Censored 2006, Gary Webb, p. 11
EPA: 9/11: the air is safe.
The Media Can Legally Lie, Project Censored

Spingola's Articles
also be included.
The One World Order, the Conservative Charade

Part 11
by Deanna Spingola
28 June 2006
“The rank and file is usually much more primitive than we imagine.
Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. The
most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one
fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly... it must confine itself to
a few points and repeat them over and over.” Joseph Goebbels
One very key point, repeated daily for decades, by the most vociferous
voices, is that the media is liberal. The conservatives have a giant advantage
over their appointed opponents, the liberals: a cohesive, complaining group
who monopolize air time claiming that a liberal bias exists in the media.
From rich to poor, the masses gain the majority of their information from the
media and take great pride in being well-informed, morally superior, pro-
war conservatives. One might doubt a premise from one source but multiple
sources suggests credibility despite lack of evidence. Switch channels or
stations – it is all the same news and it seems to favor the government.
Dissident voices are rare and quickly disqualified as treasonous, out of

touch, unpatriotic, putting our troops in harm’s way or helping Al Qaeda
(excuse for media censorship and suspension of the 1st Amendment). Dissent
is not allowed in a dictatorship. One apparent exception is the illegal alien
invasion, however misdirected the criticism is. Voter apathy has turned to
anger over what is essentially an orchestrated invasion by invitation. It is
easy to criticize after the fact while congress deliberates and Americans pay
the price.
The conservative voices include but are not limited to: Rush Limbaugh, Bill
O’Reilly, Michael Savage, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Prager, Bill Bennett,
Sean Hannity, Michael Reagan, Matt Drudge, Oliver North, Ann Coulter,
Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt, Rusty Humphries, Larry Elder, Neal Boortz,
Mark Davis, G. Gordon Liddy and don’t forget the televangelists. There are
also numerous individuals who author newspaper columns and well
publicized books. Who do the liberals have? Who is comparable among the
radio, television, and print personalities? If you can think of anyone – how
regularly is he or she verbally vanquished and vilified by the conservatives?
So-called conservative con artist talk show hosts do not educate or enlighten
but present a deceptive dialogue of disinformation which promotes the
theoretical global war of terror. They brainwash their listeners and intimidate
and insult their non compliant callers as they glorify death and war disguised
as patriotism. Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
“The biggest political joke in America is that we have a liberal press. It's a
joke taken seriously by a surprisingly large number of people... The myth of
the liberal press has served as a political weapon for conservative and right-
wing forces eager to discourage critical coverage of government and
corporate power ... Americans now have the worst of both worlds: a press
that, at best, parrots the pronouncements of the powerful and, at worst,
encourages people to be stupid with pseudo-news that illuminates nothing
but the bottom line.” Mark Hertzgaard
In 1995 Bill Kristol confessed to the New Yorker: “The liberal media were
never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by
conservatives for conservative failures.”
The charges of liberal bias are just maneuvers in a cynical game explained
Rich Bond, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee. The
nasty accusations hurled at the liberals by angry wannabe victims function
like the heckling of passionate sports spectators who scream and yell
“unfair” over every single penalty. “The referee will think twice before
blowing the whistle” and might “cut you a little slack on the next one.
Conservatives have learned to ‘work the ref’ so diligently that their
exclusion is one of the most widely discussed topics in the media – with
them doing most of the talking.” The poor, pitiful highly visible and very
verbal, amply paid conservatives would have us believe that they are all
“media outcasts” all the while appearing on numerous radio and television
shows.
According to Mark Crispin Miller, the so-called liberal press was a

consistent advocate for Bush and his collaborating cronies. The mainstream
media either downplayed or suppressed the following brief list of fascistic
incidences involving an insecure but dictatorial Bush who obviously
recognizes his numerous shortcomings but cannot tolerate any appearance of
opposition:
• They hid the many evidences of Bush’s unpopularity;
• They repressed news of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan;
• Repressed news of war crimes;
• The Bush White House withheld the October 19th CIA report on 9/11
until after the election;
• There was no mainstream coverage of Bush’s true standing in his

party;
• Many well-known Republicans were actually backing Kerry;
• The press hid evidence of Bush’s low repute;
• The press was silent on Bush’s international unpopularity;
• In the 2004 campaign the press ignored any evidence that the
president was not well liked;
• The press ignored new voters and many polls which preferred Kerry;
• The press did not report the egregious behavior on the part of Bush
and company on the campaign trail such as barring people from
events, or having others arrested who happened to voice any
opposition;
• Hundreds, some not even protestors, were arrested and held illegally
during the Republican convention in New York;
• Anyone not showing obvious enthusiasm on the convention floor was

ousted;
• The TV networks refused to air ads for Michael Moore’s film

Fahrenheit 911
• A couple in Corpus Christi were arrested for wearing anti-Bush T-

shirts at a Bush speech. After their release she was fired from her
FEMA job;
• Admission was not allowed to a Bush event for anyone wearing

Kerry stickers on their clothes;
• The press ignored the fact that on the campaign trail Bush spoke to
select groups – perfect for photo ops.
• Hours and hours of air time and column space was given to the “Swift
Boat Veterans for Truth,” an expensive propaganda tactic hatched by
Karl Rove;
• There was hardly a mention of Bush’s military irregularities including

the missing 1972 physical, 1970 pictures of Bush wearing medals he
had not received and absences (AWOL);
• The press ignored the fact that Bush could not or would not produce a
valid DD214 (discharge papers).
One glaring incident involved Dan Rather, along with four television news
producers, all formerly of CBS News. The four were Mary Mapes, Betsy
West, Josh Howard, and Mary Murphy. Their offense: they “exposed a rich
kid whose powerful daddy got him out of the military draft during the war in
Vietnam. The rich kid is the president; the daddy was another president.”
CBS appointed an Independent Review Panel, consisting of just two people,
to determine the ethics of the five individuals. The two experts were Dick
Thornburgh, Attorney General in the administration of George H. W. Bush
and Louis Boccardi. Thornburgh, hardly objective, is known to have
“whitewashed the investigation of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.” With his
“help” Exxon escaped full culpability. Oil and water do not mix but oil and
Bush have always been an interesting concoction.
Viacom, the owner of CBS, is the second-largest media company in the

country and owned by Sumner M. Redstone, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, a very rich media mogul. Viacom also owns Nickelodeon, MTV,
Infinity Broadcasting, Paramount, Blockbuster and BET on cable, as well
the UPN broadcast network. Redstone is the mega media mogul responsible
for the ousting of Dan Rather who dared question our war president’s
military record. Out with free speech, investigative reporting and in with
political and corporate expediency.
“Reacting to the document scandal at CBS News, Sumner M. Redstone,

chairman and chief executive of Viacom, CBS' parent, vowed that the results
of a recently announced probe would be ‘appropriate’--and the consequences
will be appropriate.” As a side note – in December 2005, Viacom changed
its name to CBS Corporation. See a list of CBS assets here. Viacom became
a spin-off company.
Redstone spoke to the to the Forbes Global CEO Conference and stated that
he was “very concerned” about a 60 Minutes story from September 8, 2004
by Dan Rather that suggested glaring irregularities in President George W.
Bush's military record. “CBS has since conceded that the documents on
which the story was based could not be authenticated. Rather has
apologized, and CBS News has said the story was a mistake.” A lengthy
career was over – his name will always be associated with this incident – an
inconvenient truth jeopardizing the One World Order agenda of a Bush
second term. If the media were truly liberal, as frequently claimed, the entire
exposure of the several skeletons in the Bush closet could not have been kept
back.
Prior to his CBS demise “In June 2002, the CBS anchor appeared on the
BBC. He looked old, defeated and made a confession he dare not speak on
American TV. ‘Fear keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough
questions,’ the aging American journalist told the British television
audience.” Rather remarked that a deadly censorship had seized U.S.
newsrooms, especially after the September 11 attack. News on the U.S. tube
was “bound and gagged.” He continued: “Any reporter who stepped out of
line would be professionally lynched as un-American.” Certain reporters
from The New York Times are currently finding this to be the case. Back in
the U.S. Rather “smothered his professional conscience and told his TV
audience, ‘George Bush is the president. He makes the decisions. He wants
me to line up, just tell me where.’”
“Commenting on the upcoming U.S. presidential election, Redstone said that

while Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) was a ‘nice guy,’ the re-election of
President Bush would be best for Viacom's interests, since the
Administration backed deregulation and other issues that would help the
company.” Kerry, who did go to Vietnam compared to Bush who didn’t, was
the subject of Unfit for Duty, an explosive and very timely book allegedly
exposing Kerry’s unearned medals and lack of courage. Private, corporate
ownership of the media includes an exclusive opportunity, through firing
and hiring practices, to greatly affect elections. The neo-cons stated: “It is
important to shape circumstances.” PNAC Statement of Principles
At 10:22 a.m. (EST) on the morning of November 3, 2004, the day after the
election and before Kerry’s concession at 1:57 p.m., the president of the
Heritage Foundation sent email to 200,000 members asking for a “generous
contribution” to help the foundation do “what we have to do right now” –
help “President Bush and his allies in Congress” to keep cutting taxes,
“modernize Social Security, “weed out terrorists and perfect the military.”
Jumping the gun and speeding ahead with one’s agenda is either arrogant
overconfidence, supported by the corporate press or sure knowledge
supplied by conspiratorial vote counters.
“For the media owners, allegations of a liberal bias make it easier for them
to impose the conservative bias they prefer. For the pseudo liberals who
work in the media system, confessing to a liberal bias is far more
comfortable than admitting that they've sold out their beliefs for a nice
salary. It's only because the mainstream media is so conservative that all
these right-wing pundits can make accusations of liberal bias without
opposition.” Bernard Goldberg and Ann Coulter, just two outraged
conservatives bravely battling the liberal dragon press, have successfully
scammed the public with their big money-making, insubstantial accusations.
Goldberg, a former correspondent, was associated with the same network
CBS that career-crunched Dan Rather. His very biased book Bias was
published on February 25, 2001 and propped up the conservative charade.
In addition to those issues mentioned above, I would like to see the
following imperative issues covered in the so-called liberal mainstream
media and the professed conservative news:
• Locations of the American concentration camps built by Kellogg,

Brown and Root;
• Bush’s plan to merge Canada, Mexico and the United States;
• More news on the inland ports;
• Media reviews of Aaron Russo’s new movie: America: From

Freedom to Fascism;
• An expose on the use of depleted uranium;
• Information about privatized military industry (PMI)
• An objective investigation of the irregularities of 9/11;
• Voting irregularities in 2000 and 2004;
• Bush’s regard for human rights and the Bill of Rights
• An expose of the Federal Reserve fraud;
• Why is the government selling off big chunks of America;
• Information on the Six-Point Agenda for Department of Homeland

Security
• Tell the American citizens about the amero, the dollar replacement;
• How about all of those stories that Project Censored defines in their
books;
• The real truth about job growth, not the jobs the government is
creating;
What about those jobs? What are those employees manufacturing? Or are
they being trained to implant ID chips, spy on their neighbors, and work as
camp guards or perhaps work on that secret super highway?
We are not any freer than the controlled, contentious cover-up media. Rush
Limbaugh is the acclaimed original “right wing” radio talk jock who
continues to successfully lambaste liberals and the purported liberal media
bias even though he admitted in 2002 that liberal bias was non existent.
Several more have joined him in this crusade. They bash the allegedly
morally decadent liberal left as compared to the “righteous” right who claim
moral superiority despite ample evidence to the contrary.
Thousands of clueless disciples, in what propagandist Michael Medved calls

“the greatest nation on God’s green earth,” tune in daily to get conservative
views as opposed to the big, bad, ugly, deceitful ‘liberal’ lies. Folks, it is
orchestrated opposition – owned by the same entities. Whether you read the
Twinkie Times, listen to tough fluff, pro-war Laura Ingraham, or watch any
of the Faux “fair and balanced” shows, including the king of castigation –
Bill O’Reilly, it is the same. Devotees are daily rewarded and energized by
the vicious attacks and criticism directed at the evil enemy – the liberal
opposition. We are so distracted we fail to recognize the synthesized
Republican/Democratic party. The genuine dissenters supporting such things
as anti-tax, pro-2nd Amendment rights, pro-Constitution, anti-big
government, and anti-war can anticipate being lumped with the terrorists –
“Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” How can
conservatives claim to prefer less government and in the same breath ask the
government to seize the church’s authority over marriage?
“Neo-con” talk radio has lent legitimacy to the Bush administration plus
phony patriotic propaganda for continual preemptive war. War means the
killing, the maiming, and the devastating illnesses of thousands of Middle-
Eastern citizens because their leader was/is non-compliant to One World
Order demands. And with the Bushs – like father, like son, nuclear air
strikes are preferable to diplomacy for establishing power, instilling fear and
furthering the work of death.
Christians should be the first to recognize the probability of secret societies

or secret combinations and money interests intent on depriving others of
their liberty or life. The death of Christ was the result of a conspiracy
associated with currency. There were plots to kill Paul and numerous others.
There were also those early day “public relations” groups who deliberately
influenced the masses to perpetuate their covert agenda – remember, the
admirers who bowed before Christ upon his entry into Jerusalem were the
same people who, a mere few days, later clamored for his death. What
changed?
Before citizens jump on that political war machine that promotes

continual conflict, we must evaluate and scrutinize the sources of our
perceptions – is it orchestrated opposition propaganda or real
information?
Go to Part 12
Samuel Johnson
Media Quotes
Big Lies by Joe Conason, page 34
Ibid, p. 35
Fooled Again by Mark Crispin Miller, p. 270-271
CBS Ousts 4 For Bush Guard Story
Censored 2006, Chapter 15, Cowardice and Conflicts: The Lynching of Dan Rather
The True Price of Oil By Ashley Shelby, AlterNet. Posted June 24, 2005
Redstone Vows 'Appropriate' Consequences For CBS News
Ibid
Censored 2006, Chapter 15, p. 401, Cowardice and Conflicts: The Lynching of Dan
Rather
Redstone Vows 'Appropriate' Consequences For CBS News
PNAC Statement of Principles
Fooled Again by Mark Crispin Miller, p. 259-260
How the Left Can Win Arguments and Influence People by John K. Wilson, p. 108
Media Cover-up See also: Project Censored
Big Lies by Joe Conason, page 34
O'Reilly threatened radio show caller with "a little visit" from "Fox security".
Michael Medved Continues To Name-Call, Smear Constitution Party Revealing His Own
Godless, Failed Vision
Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People

Spingola's Articles
also be included.
The New World Order, Stage-managed Morality

Part 12
by Deanna Spingola
According to the Hegelian Dialectics there must be a crisis, or controlled

opposition, with a predetermined solution designed to move society towards
a one world government. Opportunistic circumstances are devised by
positioning effectual, charismatic people into situations where they can
manipulate perceptions and then ultimately use their increasing power to
establish and escalate minor concerns into major calamities. The elite
manufactures and finances fear in order to generate weakness for the sole
purpose of bringing the masses under their control.
There are a few methods of positioning appropriate individuals into suitable

circumstances: a contrived election, a coup d'état, CIA sponsorship and
assignment, or a combination of the three with supportive, unmerited media
promotion or the opposite – character assassination. And there are
susceptible personalities, either unprincipled or incredibly naïve, who will
permit globalist manipulation for a variety of reasons. Political
assassinations (ritual public executions), allegedly carried out by crazed lone
gunmen, fall into the category of the coup d'état.
The CIA, the primary functionary of big business and international banking,
recruits naïve but willing college students, radical religious fundamentalists
and anyone else who demonstrates charisma, aptitude, and guiltless
mendacity and is willing to sacrifice integrity for financial rewards and
power. These obliging, newly-trained individuals are systematically
entrenched within every facet of society in order to obscure our perceptions,
dismantle our values, falsify our history, corrupt our communities and
destabilize families. Conventional appearing infiltrators, posturing as
benefactors are embedded within the government, the courts, the media, the
fields of medicine and psychology, and religion.
Soon after the establishment of the U.N. and the CIA our traditional values,
stable marriages and morality rapidly began to decline while crime, drug
use, divorce, promiscuity, pornography and perversion accelerated. Family
destabilization is not happenstance but a very deliberate plan. The
Rockefeller Foundation had funded the “research” efforts of the decadent
Alfred Kinsey whose junk science instigated the family-destroying moral
metamorphosis of America. Kinsey’s work was further enhanced by the
American Law Institute's Model Penal Code. The American Law Institute
was created in 1923 as the educational arm of the American Bar Association.
The development of the Model Penal Code was, not surprisingly, also
funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. The Penal Code decreased criminal
accountability for criminal predators engaging in serious crime against
women and children.
Kinsey’s deliberately misleading research brought about predictable social

behavior minus the appropriate liability. Sleazy speculation masquerading as
authentic research took on an aura of respectability and credibility because it
was highly publicized by allegedly trustworthy media people. The initial
responses of shocked abhorrence gradually developed into acceptance.
Inclusion of this “research,” in textbooks and daily newspapers apparently
endorsed it despite the emerging societal cause and effect consequences. The
successful escalation of every synchronized crisis depends on mass media
deception. As defined by the founding fathers, a free press should serve the
public interest, not the opportunistic tyrants who have absconded with the
reins of government.
Another CIA asset, Gloria Steinem (Smith College graduate), was recruited
by Cord Meyer after being referred to him by an acquaintance from the CIA
financed National Student Association. Meyer was the head of the CIA’s
International Organizations division. With CIA money, funneled through the
tax-free Ford Foundation, [1] Steinem set up the Independent Research
Service (part of Meyer’s Congress for Cultural Freedom) in order to
organize a trip for a group of students, scholars and others to the seventh
postwar World Youth Festival to be held in Vienna in 1959. [2] One World
Order proponent Zbigniew Brzezinski, then an assistant professor at
Harvard, accompanied Steinem to Vienna at CIA expense. [3]
Steinem’s feminist articles were published in Esquire and New York

Magazine in the early 1960s through editor and publisher Clay Felker,
another CIA asset. Her own monthly magazine Ms. Magazine, subsidized by
Warner Communications, came out in the summer of 1972. The charismatic
Steinem always had sufficient positive media coverage to perpetuate the
globalist agenda which effectively implied and generated grassroots support.
The feminist movement, a totally managed crisis, exploded into a viable
vehicle which provoked competition and contention between the genders
and deliberately wreaked havoc among families of every ethnic group.
The result of “liberating” women constituted enforced labor cloaked as a

unique privilege but was calculatingly designed to benefit the abundantly
rich international bankers through additional income tax revenue. Women
could then work full time in addition to responsibilities at home. Besides,
two incomes, frequently necessitated by continuous and intentional Federal
Reserve inflation, compel mothers to abandon their precious children to
strangers at daycare centers where their vulnerable minds can be saturated.
Nothing fills the emotional void of missing one’s mother in the formative
years – not even the extra guilt gifts that two incomes might produce.
The Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade on 22 January 1973, which wasn’t
really about women’s “reproductive rights.” The once desperate and
pregnant Norma McCorvey, alias Jane Roe, recently testified before
Congress: “I am not a trained spokesperson, nor a judge, but I am a real
person – a living human being who was supposed to be helped by my
lawyers and the courts in Roe v. Wade. But instead, I believe that I was used
and abused by the court system in America. Instead of helping women in
Roe v. Wade, I brought destruction to me and millions of women throughout
the nation.” … “My lawyers wanted to eliminate the right of society to
protect women and children from abortionists.” [4] After Kinsey and the
Supreme Court, abortion statistics predictably accelerated into a national
crisis. Private decisions between a woman and her doctor were now under
government jurisdiction.
There was a textbook censorship case in Kanawha County, West Virginia,

which energized local religious groups. The Kanawha school board
approved 325 books on March 12, 1974 which incensed members of the
local Ku Klux Klan.[5] However, it was publicized as a concerned parents’
rights issue. The “problem” concerned specific books written by some
African-American authors that described their inequitable status before the
law as well as their typically substandard lifestyles. Heaven forbid that
middle-class American children should discover the realities of the dismal
lives of those less fortunate for lack of opportunity. Bootstrap success is only
achievable on a level playing field.
Three religious leaders, Reverend Marvin Horan and Reverend Ezra Graley
and Ed Miller, a self-proclaimed Klansman organized rallies and instigated
parent disapproval and participation. Additionally, Reverend Horan was
charged with attempting to blow up one of the schools. Reverend Ezra
Graley, a liaison to the newly organized Heritage Foundation, worked
closely with Miller and Horan. They sent James T. McKenna, the general
counsel to the Heritage Foundation in the mid 1970s, to represent the
protesters. Congressman Phillip Crane, also in concert with the Heritage
Foundation, appealed to constituents for funds for the protesters. Reverend
James Lewis, pastor of the Charleston Episcopal Church attempted to
counter the protestors and later testified that Crane refused to say what the
funds were used for. McKenna was able to obtain press coverage through the
Washington Post. [6]
Well-placed individuals and well-financed tax-free foundations (501 (c) (3),

like the Heritage Foundation, fund political activists and disseminate
disinformation and misinformation via the corporate media and extensive
bulk mailings to concerned, provoked subscribers who ultimately finance
their own demise through their contributions. “The early 1970s were the
worst of times, and the best of times in which to launch a conservative think
tank in Washington, D.C. Conservative leaders and conservative ideas were
out of public favor.” [7]
And because it was the worst of times for Americans – from the bra-burning
rebellious sixties through the extensive casualties (58 thousand) and the
massive debt of the Vietnam War which understandably created a lot of anti-
war sentiment – particularly after many Americans discovered the
devastating nature of the weapons used in Vietnam. Many POWs were left
behind, abandoned by our own government. [8] All of the losses were
without a constitutional declaration of war. Americans supposedly battled
against international communism. The only benefactors were Wall Street
brokers and Johnson’s business cronies in Texas, California and
Washington. That prolonged war took the life of about one million
Vietnamese – whole villages were needlessly destroyed.
Then there was the 1972 break-in at the national Democratic Party
headquarters at the Watergate. This fiasco led to the resignation of Richard
Nixon on August 9, 1974. Nixon was the president who signed SALT I
giving the Soviet Union nuclear parity with America. He also instituted
wage and price controls and tried to implement such welfare proposals as the
Family Assistance Plan. He proudly proclaimed, “I am now a Keynesian in
economics.” Justifiable distrust of government was prevalent. Such
circumstances, not happenstance by any means, created the perfect social
climate for multitudes of good versus evil (thesis versus antithesis) bitter
battles.
On August 7, 1974, Congressmen John J. Rhodes, minority leader of the

House of Representatives, joined Senators Barry M. Goldwater and Hugh D.
Scott to inform Nixon that impeachment was inevitable if he did not resign.
That meeting followed the release of the Watergate cover-up tapes on June
23, 1972, which revealed Nixon's involvement. Nixon antagonists welcomed
the resignation.
Albert Harold Quie [9] and John J. Rhodes, members of The Fellowship, an
influential exclusive society, visited Vice President Gerald Ford at a special
“prayer meeting” on August 8, 1974, the day before Ford was sworn in as
president. Interestingly, Ford’s Chief of Staff was Dick Cheney. His Defense
Secretary was Donald Rumsfeld and George H. W. Bush served as Director
of the CIA. The elite repeatedly resurface. Allegedly, Nixon resigned at the
suggestion of the powerful Fellowship. Chuck Colson, a Fellowship
member, invited Nixon to join them in an attempt to salvage his image but
he wanted nothing to do with them. [10]
Americans had little trust in their government and felt vulnerable,

disillusioned and betrayed, the perfect environment for the candidacy of the
perceived kinder, gentler James Earl Carter, a born again Christian. [11] He
was not the first president to invoke the rhetoric of religion but with the
plethora of social and moral ills, the religion tactic would now be more
effective in generating votes than in past generations. The great awakening
of a formerly silent section of the electorate began to be heard. Political
activity and dialogue emanated from a distinct Christian group which helped
elect Jimmy Carter.
For decades, we have not really elected the candidates of our choice – we
merely go through the charade of voting for the pre selected individuals that
will do the diabolical bidding of the elite. “Late in 1972, W. Averell
Harriman (known at that time as the ‘grand old man of the Democrats’),
Establishment strategist and CFR member, told Milton Katz (CFR member),
Director of International Studies at Harvard: ‘We've got to get off our high
horses and look at some of those southern governors.’ Carter was mentioned,
and Katz informed Rockefeller. Rockefeller had met with Carter in 1971,
when they had lunch in the Chase Manhattan's Board of Director's dining
room, and was impressed with the fact that Carter had opened trade offices
for the state of Georgia in Tokyo.” [12]
Beginning in 1973 the Republican’s “Southern Strategy” was cultivated and
nurtured by George H. W. Bush, the recently installed chairman of the
Republican National Committee – complete with two assistants who would
do whatever it took to further the agenda : Karl Rove and Lee Atwater. With
the additional strength and unique fundraising skills of Pat Robertson, Jerry
Falwell, Bob Jones, and other fundamentalist Christians the south fell into
the welcome arms of the Republican Party.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission in 1973,

along with David Rockefeller, said in an October 1973 speech: “The
Democratic candidate will have to emphasize work, family, religion, and
increasingly, patriotism, if he has any desire to be elected.” [13] “One of
the commission's primary goals was to place a Trilateral-influenced
president in the White House in 1976, and to achieve that goal it was
necessary to groom an appropriate candidate who would be willing to
cooperate with trilateral aims.” [14] Carter had also attended an invitation-
only Bilderberg meeting before his “election.” With assistance from the
Establishment media [15] Carter, posing as an “outsider,” promised to clean
up the mess in Washington. He stressed the very items that his mentor
Brzezinski suggested: work, family, religion and patriotism. Carter's
religious convictions became a big part of his campaign.
Senator Barry M. Goldwater stated in his book With No Apologies: “This

may cost me everything that I have, but I've got to get out an alert to the
American people. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillfully
coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power,
political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateralists
intend is the creation of a world-wide economic power superior to the
government of the nation states. In other words, what they are driving,
orchestrating, meshing and gearing to accomplish is the New World Order,
the one-world government.”
The 1976 election of the amiable Trilateralist (recommended for

membership April 13, 1973) and CFR member Jimmy Carter, with all the
appearances of a political anomaly, also had the right aptitude. To celebrate
the Trilateral election, Carter was Time Magazine’s Man of the Year,
January 3, 1977 (he also graced Time’s cover on July 26, 1976). Hedley
Donovan, Time’s former Editor-in-Chief is a Trilateralist and a Rhodes
Scholar. He was also Carter's senior adviser on domestic affairs and media
relations. “According to the Dektor Psychological Stress Evaluator, a lie
detector which measures voice stress with an oscillograph, there was no
stress in Carter's voice when he lied, which would seem to indicate that he is
a pathological liar.” [16] Imagine that, a politician that compulsively lies!
Zbigniew Brzezinski became Carter’s National Security Advisor and Cyrus

Vance (nephew of John W. Davis, of the J. P. Morgan bank who was the
first President of the CFR) was his Secretary of State. Foreign policy was
clearly established and dictated by Brzezinski. Carter appointed dozens of
CFR members [17] and about three dozen members [18] of the Trilateral
Commission to the highest unelected offices in government. Many current
officials also have connections and influence with the Trilateral Commission
and the CFR.[19] From Carter on, each president has filled his
administration with members of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.
“When conservative leaders realized that fundamentalists and other

evangelicals might be induced to become more involved in politics and that
it might be possible to mold that political action into support of Republican
candidates, they provided resources to help form groups such as the Moral
Majority, the Christian Voice, and the Religious Roundtable in 1978 and
1979.” [20]
Leave it to the elite, with sufficient time to conspire, to orchestrate an

“election” designed to manipulate America’s sleeping religious while
implementing other nefarious objectives. Ultimately, this would lead to a
super subtle attack against the religious stipulations embodied in the First
Amendment.
Go to Part 13
[1] Appendix I: Ford Foundation — A Case Study of the Aims of Foreign Funding
[2] Feminism and the CIA-1
Another Revolution, the Feminist Movement By Deanna Spingola; See also Feminist
[3]
Gloria Steinem of the CIA: "Ms. Immanuel Goldstein" attracting/guiding dissent
[4]Congressional Testimony, Federal Documents Clearing House 6/23/2005 Statement of

Norma McCorvey, Committee on Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil
Rights and Property Rights
[5] Kanawha County textbook controversy
[6] The Coors Connection by Russ Bellant, p 4
[7] The Power of Ideas, The Heritage Foundation at 25 Years
[8]Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed its Own POWs in Vietnam
by Monika Jensen-Stevenson & William Stevenson
Records of the Fellowship Foundation - Collection 459, Billy Graham Center,

[9]
Archives
[10] Exposé, the Christian Mafia
[11] James Earl Carter, Jr.
[12] The Trilateral Commission
[13] Jimmy Carter and the Trilateralists: Presidential Roots by Laurence H. Shoup
excerpted from the book Trilateralism edited Holly Sklar South End Press, 1980
[14] Trilateral Commission: World Shadow Government
[15] His Masters Voice
[16] The Trilateral Commission
[17] Council on Foreign Relations Thugs in the Carter Regime
[18] Trilateral Members in the Carter Administration
[19] Media Blackout on Trilaterals, Secretive Commission Meets to Talk War, Trade
Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics by Clyde

[20]
Wilcox and Carin Larson p. 41
also be included.
The New World Order, the Religious Right?
Part 13
By Deanna Spingola
2 October 2006
The movement currently known as the Religious Right did not suddenly
emerge from nowhere. New World Order proponents recognized that to
fulfill their nefarious plans they would have to manipulate others to
accomplish certain tasks – the destruction of the Republic and the
Constitution via faulty interpretations, abuse and imbalance of power,
executive orders and other legally prohibited activities. To facilitate the
objectives, individuals or organizations that had already secured the
confidence of the American people would be used. Overt activities and
obvious lies would never suffice. As it was with Judas, someone familiar
and trustworthy would seldom create doubt. But half truths about genuine
issues, combined with messages of hope and faith, lead the passionate
masses to accept and act upon repetitive misinformation. Useful idiots,
knowledgeable minions or ego-driven, power-hungry individuals have
always proven valuable to the establishment of the one world government.
Ostensibly the Religious Right is a social movement comprised mainly of

evangelical Protestants, fundamentalist Christians and other conservatives
who embrace the same religious goals and viewpoints regarding United
States government policies. Allegedly the movement is not partisan.
However, most participants are associated with the Republican Party. A
cartoon character on the front cover of Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber’s
book Banana Republicans says to the other: You’re either with the
Republican Party – or you’re with the terrorists! There’s no middle ground!
Don’t you agree? Despite claims to the contrary, GOP does not stand for
God’s Own Party! [1] This meaningful phrase, used by Jesus, has recently
been mangled and politicized to evoke support for long term warfare. “He
that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me
scattereth abroad.” [2]
Theological conservatism does not make an individual a member of the

Religious Right. Up until about 1975, Christians, focusing on their own sins,
typically avoided the corrupt world of politics but were persuaded that they
have a civic, as well as a religious, responsibility to participate. Now there
are hundreds of Religious Right groups of various sizes and visibility. Some
concentrate on a single issue and derive their finances through fundraising
efforts and are incorporated as 501 (c) 3 or 4. A tax exempt status of 501 (c)
3 prohibits political activity and candidate endorsement. To skirt this
prohibition, some organizations create legal departments and house a stable
of lobbyists to conduct those efforts. Interestingly, selective prosecution
enables the government friendly groups to perform otherwise questionable
activities. Conversely, anti-war preachers who vocalize their concerns
jeopardize everything. Here are a few “approved” groups:
• Christian Coalition of America: Founded in 1989 by Pat Robertson.

He resigned in 2001. There are 30 chapters throughout the country.
Robertson also founded Operation Blessing, a cover for other
activities?
• American Center for Law and Justice: Founded by Pat Robertson in
1990. Jay Sekulow is their Executive Director and Chief Counsel.
• Citizens for Excellence in Education: Founded by Robert L. Simonds.

Against the separation of church and state. They have nationwide
chapters.
• Concerned Women for America: Founded in 1979 by Beverly

LaHaye. 500 regional groups across the country. This group is against
separation of church and state. LaHaye is a trustee of Falwell’s
Liberty University. CWA supported the Nicaraguan contras. [3]
• Coral Ridge Ministries: founded in 1974 by Rev. D. James Kennedy,

an ardent opponent of separation of church and state. “CRM has the
greatest number of TV station affiliates of any religious program in
the U.S. Altogether, nearly 3 million people listen weekly to CRM
programming on radio or television.” [4]
• Eagle Forum: Founded in 1972 by Phyllis Schlafly to oppose the

Equal Rights Amendment. Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense
Fund, the Eagle Forum’s foundation. Affiliate Groups: The Eagle
Forum Collegians, a network for conservative college students. The
Eagle Forum PAC contributes to right-wing political campaigns.
• Focus on the Family: Founded in 1977 by Dr. James Dobson who is

broadcast daily on more than 3,000 radio facilities in North America
and other places and reaches over 200 million people every day.
Dobson has been very influential in Republican Administrations as a
“family” expert. Donald Paul Hodel, FOF’s President, is a former
Reagan Administration official who served as U.S. Under Secretary of
the Interior, U.S. Secretary of Energy, and U.S. Secretary of the
Interior. He also served as the president of the Christian Coalition
from 1997 to 1999.
• Family Research Council: This group, located in Washington DC,

was founded in 1981 by Dr. James Dobson. It was originally headed
by Gary Bauer. It is now headed by Tony Perkins. Their objective is
to establish a conservative Christian standard of morality in all of
America’s domestic and foreign policy.
• National Legal Foundation: Founded in 1985 by Pat Robertson and
funded by Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network (no longer
affiliated). “The mission of the National Legal Foundation is to
prayerfully create and implement innovative strategies that, through
decisive action, will cause America's public policy and legal system to
support and facilitate God's purpose for her.” [5]
• American Family Association: founded in 1977 by Rev. Donald

Wildmon, a United Methodist minister. The original name was the
National Federation for Decency. The focus of this group is media
criticism. Wildmon called for a shutdown of PBS. They also attempt
to restrict businesses that do not discriminate against such things as
homosexuality. They perpetuate misinformation regarding the
separation of church and state. They have 100 employees and five
full-time lawyers. The Center for Law and Policy is an AFA affiliate.
They sell a variety of books on their web site.
• Traditional Values Coalition: The largest church-lobby in the United

States Founded in 1980 by Rev. Louis Sheldon. Claims over 43,000
churches nationwide representing 12 denominations.
• Chalcedon: Founded by the late Rousas John Rushdoony, father-in-

law of Gary North and the creator of an 800 page explanation of the
Ten Commandments and their cultural application for today. It is the
original, defining text of Reconstructionism. Reconstructionists
pattern their strict theological ideologies after John Calvin.
Many of the issues these groups have embraced have captured the attention
of other religious congregations who share their concerns. However, their
commonality is that they are absolutely and mistakenly hostile to separation
of church and state. Most of the movement’s ambitious, charismatic leaders
claim biblical inerrancy and actively call for a fundamentalist return to the
Bible and seek to impose their far-right positions on everyone else through
the political process. The skillful leaders emotionally marshal the masses
through radio and television. They realize that their greatest success is in
building bottom up support. Rather than focus on the White House or
Congress, they encourage participation in local politics. Any successful
movement must begin in the local neighborhoods.
This mobilization did not alter their primary goals – influence court
appointments, elections and government policy with regard to a variety of
social issues: pro-life, pro-family, home-schooling, prayers in school, anti-
gay, etc. Why would anyone question a pro-family stance? Focusing on
other people’s sins draws attention away from our own. Hatred isn’t
inherent; it is learned and institutionalized by otherwise good citizens.
Abhorrence of sin is often transferred to the sinner generating bigotry and
often violence – that same sort of violence that enables otherwise good
people to kill men, women and children conveniently labeled as terrorists.
War results in big profits, dead bodies and traumatized military personnel.
Prohibition did not diminish drunkenness any more than a marriage

amendment will curb homosexuality. The merging of religion and politics, a
lethal mixture, may produce a Taliban-like tyranny. Some religicrats are
attempting to create a sinless society by imposing restrictive regulations.
There is a certain attraction, for many, in contributing to a cause. This
appeal, accompanied by money, rarely changes individuals. Man rarely
changes from the outside in but from the inside out. Dutiful contributors
might feel heart swells while increasingly wealthy recipients shield their
elite positions in tax exempt foundations. The best way for responsible
individuals to make a difference in society is best accomplished by living
honest, respectful lives and teaching their children respect and integrity, rare
characteristics.
The implementation of legalized abortion set up the perfect environment for

thousands of outraged Christians to be manipulated into thinking they could
fight this moral monstrosity which a stacked Supreme Court passed. The
Constitution guarantees life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Therefore
the government has an obligation to protect the most vulnerable of all its
citizens – the children. They deliberately failed – setting up a hostile
circumstance for the morally manipulated.
The thoughts of our own sweet children produce outrage towards abortion.
This justifiable compassion brings moral people, easy targets, into a
movement they may otherwise not comfortably join. Christians should easily
understand that aborted, martyred children return, in glory, to God. The
blood of the innocent shall stand as a witness against the perpetrators.
Bystanders, though powerful, often cannot intercede. [6] These precious
children are often discarded in the same violent manner that Christ was.
However, God, not individuals, will judge all circumstances. Abortion will
always exist despite big contributions and efforts to anti-abortion groups.
One on one, we might inspire better choices. Mass opposition, often
accompanied by violence, does not typically succeed. We must ask – what is
the ultimate goal of this or any other social movement?
“The single greatest threat to church-state separation in America is the

movement known as the Religious Right. Organizations and leaders
representing this religio-political crusade seek to impose a fundamentalist
Christian viewpoint on all Americans through government action.” [7]
“Religious liberty and separation of church and state are the cornerstones of
the American way of life. The Framers of the Constitution designed the First
Amendment's religion clauses to embrace two key concepts: the government
will not endorse or oppose any particular religious viewpoint (or religion
generally), and will not interfere with the right of citizens to practice their
faith. As Thomas Jefferson put it, the American people created a ‘wall of
separation between church and state.’” [8] The word “separation” is not
mentioned in the Constitution but is well defined in the First Amendment.
Cultural conservatism has been the goal of the Neo-Right since the Reagan
years. Americans witnessed the birth of a bevy of highly visible Religious
Right preachers with a similar agenda. By 1990 the Free Congress
Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization founded in July 1974 by
Paul Weyrich and Joseph Coors, had both sufficient members and money to
target and defeat opponents at will. Chairman Paul Weyrich’s agenda as
stated in Dallas in August 1980: “We are talking about Christianizing
America. We are talking about simply spreading the gospel in a political
context.” This sounds like a lofty, benign goal unless you evaluate exactly
which brand of Christianity, among the many denominations, he is
promoting. And what if you are not Christian?
When a government accepts and promotes one religion over another and
adjusts laws to accommodate that religion, they are interfering with the most
basic human right: to worship or not worship God according to one’s own
conscience. The Savior did not work through the government to compel
individual righteousness. His disciples did not engage lobbyists to travel to
Rome to financially reward acquiescent government officials in order to
force people to stop committing sin. His disciples did not procure armor and
horses and preemptively attack the “evil axis” of their day. They did not
encourage their version of our CIA to assassinate non compliant foreign
leaders.
His message was a message of peace even to the point of turning the other
cheek. Have you personally ever done that? It works – loving your enemy
changes his or her heart. Praying for our enemy changes our heart. Religion
is feeding the hungry, clothing the naked and visiting the sick. Charitable
contributions should benefit individuals who have authentic needs. We shall
always have the poor among us. It is up to religious leaders to inspire
individuals to keep the commandments according to denominational ideals
and principles; if Christian, then follow Him. Rather than focus on the many
evils of society, we must each focus on our own sins. We all have them – it
is just a matter of degree. I believe in a just God who takes our individual
circumstances into account. The proper path to redemption does not require
a political trip to Rome or Capital Hill. One begins the genuine journey with
a broken heart, humble self-evaluation, repentance, personal obedience, and
love of all others. This ultimately brings us peace and leads us to God.
Go to Part 14
[1] How the Republicans Stole Christmas by Bill Press

[2] New Testament, Matthew 12:30
[3] Spiritual Warfare, the Politics of the Christian Right by Sarah Diamond, p. 84
[4] About Coral Ridge Ministries
[5] NLF Mission Statement
[6] Alma, Chapter 14:10-11
[7] Religious Right Research
[8] In the Courts, First Amendment
also be included.
The One World Order – un-Fair & un-Balanced

Part 14
By Deanna Spingola
17 October 2006
Despite the guarantees of the First Amendment, America is one of the most
propagandized countries on the planet due to government regulation,
deregulation, selective licensing, discriminatory editing, substantial money
from ideology-minded, tax exempt foundations, accelerated, unwarranted
promotion of slanted print material, biased partisanship and network
privatization. Freedom of the press (any and all media) could easily be
redefined: the organizations, corporate, religious or government that maintain
any degree of control over America’s information sources have unlimited
freedom to willfully indoctrinate or distort our perceptions. As a result,
Orwell’s 1984 has become our reality, with its massive “newspeak” vernacular
fully functional.
In the last four or more decades, through character assassination,

disinformation, misinformation, lack of objectivity, lack of reasonable dissent,
deliberate omissions and downright dishonesty, the entire country has been
culturally moved to the far right without so much as a whimper. Conservatives
and their Religious Right colleagues seized control of the media while claiming
they have no voice. One of their ignoble tactics is their unsubstantiated
declaration of liberal bias – significantly hyped by checkbook journalists with
such book titles as Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the
News, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, Persecution, How Liberals Are Waging
War Against Christians, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, and Slander.
Liberalism, once the champion of social justice, is intentionally and

aggressively associated with every contemptible, evil aspect of American
culture. As a consequence, most individuals are anxious to be defined as
conservative which, under the current administration, should be subject to
scrutinizing interpretation. Distracted, polarized, lemming-like citizens have
been brainwashed, propagandized and ultimately victimized into believing
whatever the compromised corporate media dishes out. Too busy watching
reality TV, many overlook reality. The masses accept the misinformation about
poor suppressed, silenced conservatives because, they contend, how could
dozens of claimants be wrong?
Ironically, leaders of the Religious Right, also very visible and vocal, claim
media and public censorship of religion and religious phrases and words
despite a vast multitude of Christian broadcasters. They are quick to cry bias
and just as speedy in demanding additional censorship for those they disagree
with by targeting advertisers.
The Trinity Broadcasting Network was founded by Dr. Paul Crouch Sr. and the
Christian Broadcasting Network was created by Pat Robertson in 1960. It has
had a long and diverse history. Their trade organization is the National
Religious Broadcasters Association which boasts 1600 members who
disseminate their messages through radio, television, and the Internet. They
claim to reach 141 million listeners and viewers. Many of these same 1600
entities publish books, email newsletters and magazines. They also maintain
substantial snail-mail databases through which they accrue financial pledges
and disseminate information and political recommendations. Read this very
enlightening essay on this organization.
Unfortunately, according to Pew, 30 percent of all Americans obtain their news

from talk radio and cable television – many never open a book. A large
percentage get their “news” from the Fox Network whose employees receive
the morning memo, a directive on how to spin the “news” of the day. Roger
Ailes, autocratic president of Fox News, has a throng of “journalists” and
guests who push right-wing propaganda disguised as news. They are notorious
in their attacks on dissenting opinions. On other stations, truth-tellers are fired.
Others censor themselves in favor of a paycheck.
Despite his claim, Bill O’Reilly is not looking out for you; he is looking out for
himself while making boatloads of money. In this regard, he is not unique
among the Fox personalities, except for his notorious belligerent arrogance.
While Fox, owned by Rupert Murdoch, appears to be the most right of center,
many stations now promulgate the same government misinformation while
demonizing any dissenters. Bill Kristol’s (PNAC*) Weekly Standard,
established in 1995, was assisted by a $3 million annual subsidy from
Murdoch. [1] Fox Network, experiencing wide viewer acceptance and financial
success, has set the standard for other networks. Party propaganda is passed off
as news on this alleged “fair and balanced” cable channel. They merely refer to
their version of the news and tell you what to think about it.
Responding to dissent, obedience-trained Americans, aptly conditioned, write

scores of letters to networks or newspapers that dare to divulge any unpleasant
facts. Citizens don’t want to know about all the un-American activities that our
government initiates in our country as well as others. So obviously, with a see-
no-evil, hear-no-evil mentality, the disobedient but objective journalist is
erroneously considered treasonous, unpatriotic, or worthy of incarceration. Just
ask Peter Arnett! Apparently the Pentagram, excuse me, Pentagon pressured
CNN about Arnett’s enlightening segment entitled “Valley of Death” which
concerned Operation Tailwind.
It is the job of the press to censure the government, not the other way around.
The press has a watchdog responsibility:
“A variety of court opinions have found that the press has an important
function as a guardian of democracy and as a check upon governmental abuse.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black perhaps best summarized this vital
theme of American constitutional law in his final concurring opinion in the
1971 ‘Pentagon Papers’ case: The government's power to censor the press was
abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the
Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of
government and inform the people.” [2]
“The courts have rejected most attempts by the government to impose prior
censorship. The best-known recent example of such a government attempt was
the Nixon administration's call for a permanent injunction against publication
of the "Pentagon Papers" by The New York Times and The Washington Post,
based on the claim that publication of the highly classified documents on the
history of U. S. involvement in Vietnam would cause grave damage to the
United States. In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court determined that the government
failed to meet the “heavy burden of showing justification of such a restraint.”
[3]
On the other hand, profanity, sexual innuendos and graphic portrayals

masquerade as entertainment. Sex, an unfortunate selling point, pervades every
aspect of our lives. Family-friendly shows faded in preference of more “adult”
programming which people evidently abhorred, then tolerated and ultimately
embraced – cultural tolerance establishes the real standards of programming
integrity. Someone is obviously watching this rubbish which incrementally
descended from mildly offensive to deplorable vulgarity. Our “entertainment”
reflects cultural morality.
Most parents, Democrat or Republican, are justifiably alarmed and concerned

for their children. As a result, we are anxiously amenable; we even request and
embrace additional censorship laws to protect us from the vileness that
pervades the corporate-owned airways. However, we already have federal laws,
albeit infrequently enforced, that should suffice. [4] We do not need, nor should
we desire, increased censorship but rather enforcement of existing decency
standards. Stations have a public, moral responsibility that should supersede
financial opportunities. Moreover, parents should supervise their children, and
themselves, and not abdicate that responsibility to the government. Ideally, we
chose our entertainment – no one forces morally destitute garbage upon the
sanctity of our homes.
When broadcast radio began in November 1920, the airwave spectrum,

according to official government theory, was in short supply. As a
consequence, they determined that it was necessary to license and regulate
(nationalize) the use of this public commodity. Obviously, anyone with a
political or religious philosophy, product or service wanted airtime.
Consequently, by 1922 there were 576 stations licensed by the Secretary of
Commerce, Herbert Hoover. By 1925 there were sixty-three stations owned by
churches or religious groups. [5] The Department of Commerce sponsored a
series of conferences for major broadcasters. At the first meeting, a
Westinghouse representative complained to Hoover that certain inferior
stations, according to him, lacked substance and recommended that only
preferred people be allowed to broadcast with a national limit of 12-15 stations.
[6]
The Radio Act of 1927 established the Federal Radio Commission (FRC)
which later became the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In 1929 a
set of guidelines known as Great Lakes Broadcasting Co., apparently based on
an acquisition by NBC, was issued by the FRC. Accordingly, a station was to
accommodate the “tastes, needs and desires of all substantial groups among the
listening public...in some fair proportion, by a well-rounded program, in which
entertainment, consisting of music of both classical and lighter grades, religion,
education and instruction, important public events, discussions of public
questions, weather, market reports, and news, and matters of interest to all
members of the family.” [7]
According to the official government story, regulation of some kind was

essential due to a barrage of signal interference. Selectively licensing
broadcasters solved the dilemma of allocating the alleged limited amount of
airwave frequency.
Government regulations, regardless of public airwave ownership, surely stifle

the free dissemination of ideas in an open marketplace. The airwaves were
defined as public property and put under the guardianship of the Commission
especially selected by the government. [8]
Possible partisan or religious bias of both broadcasters and government-

appointed commissioners was obviously an issue. “The station itself must be
operated as if owned by the public....It is as if people of a community should
own a station and turn it over to the best man in sight with this injunction:
‘Manage this station in our interest...’ The standing of every station is
determined by that conception.” [9] Broadcasters began acting as public
trustees and communities apparently made certain naïve assumptions that this
charge would never be violated. See this page for a comprehensive discussion
about the political ramifications of broadcast policy.
The Communications Act of 1934 [10] established the regulatory Federal

Communications Commission (FCC) which began operating on July 11, 1934
with seven commissioners appointed by the President, and confirmed by the
Senate. This was changed to five in 1983. [11]
In 1942 the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) was created by

conservative evangelicals to raise awareness against those who they felt had
abandoned the true gospel of Jesus Christ. “In 1944, the NAE formed the
National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), whose goals were more specific to
safeguarding access for its conservative evangelical membership to the
airwaves, in addition to providing protection from competition with liberal
denominational broadcasters and the United States government.” [12]
License renewals depended on compliance to FCC regulations. However,

policy changes occurred in 1960 which allowed TV stations to sell additional
airtime to religious broadcasters which appeared to fulfill the station’s public
interest obligation. So, even more Televangelists began to fill the airwaves as
well as their portfolios. Why preach and pass the plate to limited weekly
congregations when one could captivate the spiritually starved multitudes
willing to commit to monthly financial pledges for legitimate in addition to
contrived causes that never culminate with any degree of measurable success.
The National Religious Broadcasters maintains that it regulates its broadcasters

and views government regulation as interference. A congressional committee
was convened to question the practices and behavior of many broadcasters but
it was squelched. “When called before the oversight committee of the House
Ways and Means Committee in October 1987, several of the nation's leading
religious broadcasters told Congressman J. J. Pickle (D-Tex.) and his
colleagues that they were quite capable of regulating themselves.” [13]
The Fairness Doctrine, adopted by the FCC in 1949, reiterated the earlier
policies that directed station licensees to provide ample opportunity for
diversity and opposing opinions. As a result, licensees, under the auspices of
the Fairness Doctrine, agreed to devote adequate airtime to concerns of public
interest and to transmit conflicting opinions about those issues. “They must
allow all points of view. That requirement was to be enforced by FCC
mandate.” [14] President Kennedy invoked the Fairness Doctrine to challenge
the imbalanced right-wing presentations of biased broadcasters. [15]
Mark S. Fowler, a communications lawyer appointed to head the FCC by

President Ronald Reagan, aggressively opposed the Fairness Doctrine as well
as the First Amendment. “He set about pruning, chopping, slashing,
eliminating, burying and deep-sixing fifty years of regulations that guarded
against monopolistic practices and excessive commercialism and protected the
public interest standard.” [16]
There were some on the right who had manipulated the Fairness Doctrine in
order to inculcate right-wing ideology into the media. Phyllis Schlafly, a
Reagan revolution promoter, favored its retention but she was out-maneuvered
by people like Terry Dolan. He was the co-founder and national chairman of
the 300,000 - member National Conservative Political Action Committee
(NCPAC) and organized and headed the Conservative Alliance (CALL). In
1984 NCPAC received $775,000 from Rev. Moon, a foreign entity. Dolan
stated that the secret of fundraising, used to target opponents, is to “make them
angry and stir up hostilities.” “The shriller you are, the easier it is to raise
funds. That's the nature of the beast.” [17] He raised 7.6 million in 1979-1980
and spent 3.3 million targeting Democratic senators. [18] “Most of the $1
million NCPAC spent on independent expenditures during the 1980 Senate
races financed attack ads against incumbents. A NCPAC target could face as
many as 72 negative radio ads a day and 200 television commercials per week,
well before the election.” [19]
Billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, heir to the Mellon banking, oil, and
aluminum fortune, finances many right-wing activities through his organization
Landmark Legal Foundation which was set up to influence education and
attack EPA regulations. Scaife also used this foundation to challenge the
constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine. The Heritage Foundation,
conservative right-wing think tank, also supported repeal. [20] The Landmark
Legal Foundation receives donations from the Sarah Scaife Foundation, Scaife-
funded Carthage Foundation, Castle Rock Foundation, and the John M. Olin
foundation. Exxon Mobil has also made donations. [21]
The Fairness Doctrine, along with diversity, fairness, equal time and objectivity
was rescinded in 1987. Television and radio stations were no longer required to
present both sides of important or controversial issues nor give equal time to
candidates. [22] Objectivity was replaced by opposition to anything
contradictory to the party line. Apparently this mentality also applied to
religion. The majority of all religious programs may be classified as
conservative evangelical. Most, despite denomination, appear Republican-
friendly. However, it is important to remember that the Religious Right does
not represent every evangelical or every Christian.
The Religious Right merged with the conservative movement after the
Communist boogeyman was vanquished and then, because of sheer numbers,
ultimately began dictating Republican Party policy. This also includes
discontinuing government funding to secular groups in favor of Religious Right
groups. Right-wing fundamentalists, with a great network of committed
members, were primed to take on society’s demons and clean up the country.
The pious conservative crusade, accelerated in the last twenty five years, is
often driven by bigotry, social intolerance and fanaticism under the umbrella of
traditional values and a perverted interpretation of compassion. Cleaning the
inner vessel has given way to cleaning up the whole country through
government intervention.
It is difficult to perceive where the influence of the Religious Right ends and
the Republican Party begins. Are the blind leading the blind in this symbiotic
relationship? Falwell and Robertson, almost before the towers fell, both blamed
liberalism for the events of 9/11. However, it didn’t take too long before the
Religious Right focused their antagonism at Islam, the new “axis of evil.”
Franklin Graham, who led Bush’s inaugural prayer, denounced Islam on
television as “a very evil and wicked religion.” Reverend Jerry Vines, a past
president of the Southern Baptist Convention, which has strong ties to the
administration, called the Muslim prophet Muhammad a “demon-obsessed
pedophile.” These remarks were widely reported in the Arab press but
somehow failed to make the “fair and balanced” Fox News. [23] No wonder
70% of evangelical leaders assume that Islam is a “religion of violence.”
America has approximately 2,000 denominations – Christians, Jews, Hindus,

Buddhists, Muslims, Atheists and others. America is also full of sin. In political
planning, particularly among the secret society elite, nothing is coincidental.
The prevalence of sin would easily pave the way for the merging of religion
and government. Politico-religionist activists, assuming the moral high road,
are attempting to redeem America through government regulation while
trashing the just law of the land – the Constitution, a secular document meant to
protect each individual regardless of religious status.
*Project for a New American Century
Go to Part 15
[1] The Weekly Standard’s War Murdoch’s magazine stands athwart history
yelling, “Attack!” By Scott McConnell
[2] US Media in the 1990s
[3] Ibid
[4] Obscenity, Indecency, & Profanity
[5] Policing the Religious Airwaves: A Case of Market Place Regulation by

Jeffrey K. Hadden
[6] The Spectrum Should Be Private Property: The Economics, History, and
Future of Wireless Technology By B. K. Marcus
[7] The Public Interest Standard In Television Broadcasting
[8] The Spectrum Should Be Private Property: The Economics, History, and
Future of Wireless Technology By B. K. Marcus
[9] The Public Interest Standard In Television Broadcasting
[10] Communications Act of 1934, pdf file
[11] Communications Act of 1934
[12] National Religious Broadcasters - Special Issue: Fundamentalist Media
[13] Policing the Religious Airwaves: A Case of Market Place Regulation by

Jeffrey K. Hadden
[14] Fairness Doctrine, U.S. Broadcasting Policy

[15] The Republican Noise Machine, Right-Wing Media and How it Corrupts
Democracy by Steve Brock, p. 294-95
[16] Ibid
[17] Council For National Policy
[18] Spiritual Warfare, the Politics of the Christian Right by Sara Diamond, p.
58
[19] Independent expenditures
Democracy by Steve Brock, p. 296
[21] Landmark Legal Foundation
Democracy by Steve Brock, p. 294-95
[23] With God on Their Side, How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled

Science, Policy, and Democracy in George W. Bush’s White House by Esther
Kaplan, p. 13
also be included.
The New World Order, Bush – God’s Choice?

Part 15
By Deanna Spingola
26 October 2006
Maneuvering the religious feelings of others to enhance one’s political

career or influence voter acceptance is certainly not a new device.
Hypocritically manipulating voters for any ulterior motive is an egregious
yet common practice. However, integrity is not a characteristic that we
usually attribute to politicians – despite personal claims of religiosity. In
fact, such claims should immediately arouse suspicion. Political rhetoric is
professionally contrived to evoke emotion and support. After an election,
when power reveals character, actions define motives more than campaign
rhetoric as officials continue to solicit support for self aggrandizing
programs that function in favor of the power elite, alias big contributors,
while falsely promising benefits to the populace. If one will not uphold their
oath to the Constitution which includes the phrase “so help me God,” why
would we expect him or her to honor promises to their constituents – mere
strangers at best?
A candidate’s religiosity should not play any part in the election or

appointment process. George W. Bush asserts that he is a Christian. Whether
he is sincere or not is insignificant unless he makes domestic or foreign
relations decisions based on his ideology. Apparently his conversion was a
direct result of his attempts to save his marriage from the effects of his
habitual drinking. Did Bush’s new Christian piety replace his allegiance to
Skull and Bones, the same secretive order that his father and grandfather had
embraced? If we are to evaluate a tree by its fruit then what can we surmise
from Bush’s actions? Are preemptive wars that have killed thousands of
men, women and children compatible with Christianity? How about the
death penalty? Do tax breaks for the wealthy fulfill Christ’s admonition to
“feed the hungry and clothe the naked?” True Christianity is not just rhetoric
but Christ-like behavior. Thomas Jefferson stated: “It is in our lives and not
in our words that our religion must be read.” [1]
Genuine religion is a personal matter between an individual and God, not a
contrivance to capture constituency support. Some presidential candidates
have rightfully regarded religious preferences as personal. John F. Kennedy
said: “I believe in a president whose views on religion are his own private
affair, neither imposed upon him by the nation or imposed by the nation
upon him as a condition to holding that office.” [2] Kennedy told the Greater
Houston Ministerial Association: “I do not speak for my church on public
matters and the church does not speak for me.” He reminded the religious
group that other faiths had experienced intolerance in the past and could
again. “Today, I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you.” [3]
George Washington wrote: “I have often expressed my sentiments, that

every man, conducting himself as a good citizen, and being accountable to
God alone for his religious opinions, ought to be protected in worshipping
the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.” [4]
Thomas Jefferson wrote only one book, Notes on Virginia, which clarifies
his opinions about religious freedom. In a letter to Benjamin Rush, he said
“Religion is a subject on which I have ever been most scrupulously
reserved.” Further, he stated “I have considered it as a matter between every
man and his Maker, in which no other, and far less the public, had a right to
intermeddle.” [5]
There should never be a religious litmus test for any political or appointed
office. Article Six states: “but no religious test shall ever be required as a
qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” [6]
According to Bush, so-called activist leftist judges would not be appointed
because he, contrary to Article 6 of the Constitution, [7] said the following:
“I believe that it points up the fact that we need common sense judges who
understand that our rights were derived from God. Those are the kind of
judges I intend to put on the bench.” [8] Technically our “rights” were
determined by constitutional law or more precisely by the court’s
interpretation of that constitutional law.
A litmus test on abortion is a deceptive, distractive, “horse already out of the
barn” false carrot instigated for the majority of Americans who view this
practice as abominable. Roe versus Wade was passed by 7 out of 9 judges
based on a faulty interpretation of a document that guarantees life, liberty
and happiness for every citizen. Abortion was deliberately legalized by a
stacked court as a divisive, “divide and conquer” tactic. New Right political
strategists turned abortion into an issue that energized the Religious Right
into a mass movement. It brought people together, Protestants and Catholics,
who had never before participated in politics. The images of dead babies
propelled new political activists to evaluate other issues and ultimately
mobilized and utilized them to facilitate the whole right-wing agenda. [9]
Both men and women want abortion repealed – enough citizens who will
gladly endorse candidates who employ right-wing rhetoric regarding
abortion. Candidate acceptance on that one issue cements voter approval
despite questionable history, secret society affiliation, and other problematic
issues. We idealistically elect candidates or approve of officials who portray
themselves as anti-abortion but who eagerly, for self-promoting motives,
vote against the Constitution in dozens of other vital issues such as CAFTA,
the formation of the North American Community, suspension of the Geneva
Conventions, acquiescing to preemptive war and other life-changing, Bill of
Rights slashing issues. Naïve Americans put all their eggs into the abortion
or marriage amendment basket – two moral issues that we have no ability to
change or control no matter how many donations we make to organizations
or political candidates who manipulate those issues for huge financial gains.
There is no comprehensive litmus test to cover all of the evil designs that are
created in the secret society board rooms of the financial elite.
Karl Rove, a long-time Bush operative, counseled Bush in his 1978 run for a
Texas congressional seat. Still around in 2004, Rove, the evil genius,
political attack strategist, advised the candidate to endorse a constitutional
amendment to ban gay marriage. It was a political device designed to draw
additional conservative votes. Religious leaders could then urge their
parishioners to support this “compassionate conservative” who understood
their moral concerns.
The very vocal, government-approved Christian Right has opposed civil

rights for homosexuals for the last three decades. James Dobson claims that
homosexuality undermines our entire society and is hurtling us towards
Sodom and Gomorrah. What next – yellow insignias to define specific
citizens not worthy of civil rights? One group should not exercise so much
influence! Yet they seek to strip the rights of unpopular cultural minorities
by pressuring the government. They send out tons of direct-mail appeals,
employ voter blackmail against public officials (who should represent
everyone) and have the means to employ expensive lobbyists.
It is more than just a matter of same-sex marriage. They could just as well
have proposed an amendment against infidelity but that would have
embarrassed a myriad of politicians who, only after being discovered,
confess their indiscretions. The whole issue became more important with the
passage of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts in 2003. Currently, in many
states it is legal to fire an individual discovered to be gay, despite their job
performance. Landlords may evict or refuse to rent to homosexual
individuals. Laws have been enacted in some localities that ban such
discrimination. The Christian Right opposes these antidiscrimination laws.
[10]
Despite anyone’s feelings about homosexuality, no one should be targeted

because of their personal moral decisions. Our rarely-read founding
documents guarantee life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone –
including gays and lesbians. A government regulation that seeks to control
our God-given agency in order to prevent certain behaviors is a satanical
tyranny. The federal government does not have the constitutional authority
to impose a moral code on the masses no matter how morally-depleted
society has become.
To cement Bush’s Christian image, an alleged “documentary” was
“independently” produced by Grizzly Adams Productions Inc. to counter
Michael Moore’s anti-war movie Fahrenheit 9/11, which was released
October 5, 2004. Supposedly, according to the introduction, this right-wing
film was produced without involvement from Bush or his handlers. [11] This
purportedly inspirational film, George W. Bush: Faith in the White House
was loosely based on two books: Tom Freiling’s George W. Bush: on God
and Country and David Aikman’s A Man of Faith: The Spiritual Journey of
George W. Bush. It became available in Christian bookstores by August 30,
2004, just in time for the Republican convention in New York, and in
mainstream stores by October 5, 2004. It was marketed for $14.95 but they
freely distributed the DVD to as many as 300,000 churches, a very small
expenditure considering the value of such a political endorsement. No one in
this documentary acknowledged the constitutional boundary between church
and state or the tax-exempt issue. [12] Interestingly, the churches that
showed this film were not threatened by the IRS. What about churches that
express anti-war sentiments?
When evangelical property developer and FITWH executive producer Ted

Beckett was asked about the problems in the Middle East he replied, “I see it
basically as a conflict between Christians and the religion of Islam, which is
a religion of hate.” That statement sets the tone of the piece which reinforces
the Bush theory that it's best to rule unquestioningly from the Mouth of
God.” [13]
Some Christian conservatives attended an invitation-only, no-press-allowed

“Family, Faith and Freedom Rally,” on August 31, 2004 brought about by
the efforts of Ralph Reed, former Christian Coalition Director, and Senator
Sam Brownback as part of the Bush campaign. Brownback told the crowd:
“We must win this culture war.” He also condemned same-sex marriage,
abortion and criticized the principle of separation of church and state. [14]
Not content to merely return their man to the White House, after the 2004
election Focus on the Family warned their supporters, the “values voters,”
about the grave “moral issues” and the activist judges that continue to put
our nation in peril. In an email to their supporters Focus on the Family said:
“The future of our nation is still in danger. We must be careful to not only
protect what has been won, but move forward aggressively, pressing for the
pro-family, pro-life and pro-mortality agenda we believe in. In other words,
we must strike while the iron is hot.” [15] Many of the questionable judges
were, in fact, appointed by Republicans but this exaggerated issue creates a
viable diversion for right-wing activists and the complicit media.
“According to Time magazine, after Bush’s re-election, a group of

evangelicals, known as “The Arlington Group,” wrote Karl Rove a letter
signed by former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, Don Wildmon, Focus
on the Family’s James Dobson, Paul Weyrich and Jerry Falwell demanding
that Bush not waver and support a constitutional amendment banning gay
marriage. Rove is credited with turning out millions of fundamentalist voters
in the 2004 presidential election. Rove also managed to turn out hundreds, if
not thousands, of evangelical and fundamentalist election ‘fixers,’ who
ensured that Democratic votes were suppressed, miscounted, undercounted,
discounted, and not counted.” [16]
Several Catholic field coordinators were hired by the Republic National

Committee to visit Catholic churches to urge support for George W. Bush.
This is certainly counter to the First Amendment as well as IRS tax exempt
policies. During a visit to Pope John Paul II, Bush’s top aids asked the
pope’s advisors to push pressure on American bishops to become ensconced
in politics and involved in cultural issues during the impending reelection
campaign. [17]
Stylishly suited political candidates hire Madison Avenue type media

advisors, speech writers and even religious advisors to properly package
themselves for voter acceptance. George W. Bush hired David Barton as a
religious advisor during his 2004 campaign. Barton, a dedicated history
revisionist spin master, is also a well-known opponent of the religious
clauses of separation of church and state contained in the First Amendment.
[18] Barton was the vice-chair of the Texas Republican Party. George W. is
certainly not the first to employ a religious advisor – his father used the
same tactics for the same objectives.
Perception management is crucial on the campaign trail where winning is

everything. He managed the move to the White House – twice. How has that
elite “victory” impacted the civil and religious freedoms of other
Americans?
Go to Part 16
The Separation of Church and State, Writings on a Fundamental Freedom by

[1]
America’s Founders, Edited by Forrest Church, p. 47
[2] How the Republicans Stole Christmas by Bill Press, p. 6
[3] Ibid, p. 59
Letter to the General Committee of the United Baptist Churches in Virginia, May
[4]
1789
The Separation of Church and State, Writings on a Fundamental Freedom by

[5]
America’s Founders, Edited by Forrest Church, p. 46
[6] Article VI
[7] The United States Constitution
[8] Bush Sets Religious Litmus Test For Judges
[9] Spiritual Warfare, the Politics f the Christian Right by Sara Diamond, p. 57

[10]
Wilcox and Carin Larson, p. 148
[11] The Religious Right, Out of the Spotlight
[12] Now on DVD: The Passion of the Bush

[13] Faith and anger
[14] "Win This Culture War"

[15]
Wilcox and Carin Larson, p. 4
Exposé: The Christian Mafia, Where Those Who Now Run the U.S. Government
[16]
Came From and Where They Are Taking Us By Wayne Madsen
[18] David Barton & the 'Myth' of Church-State Separation
also be included.
The New World Order, Piety, Packaging & Politics

Part 16
By Deanna Spingola
29 October 2006

Presidential candidate George H. W. Bush hired evangelist Doug
Wead, a divorced Assemblies of God preacher as a consultant in order
to “galvanize the Religious Right.” [1] Wead helped prepare Bush by
acting out the part of televangelist Pat Robertson in a months-long
series of exhaustively researched and well-financed mock presidential
debates. [2] He coached the elder Bush on evangel-speak to help him
connect with Christian fundamentalists.
A little more than a decade later, George W. Bush, already proficient

in evangel-lingo, also hired Wead, the consultant. Evangelicals
immediately recognize Bush as a professed “born-again Christian.”
[3] Wead, unbeknownst to Bush, taped many of their telephone
conversations over a two year period of time. “The conversations
spend much time on Bush's religious beliefs and his courting of the
evangelical right.” [4]
After Bush had become president he told Richard Land, president of

the Southern Baptist Convention Ethics and Religious Liberty
Commission, “God wanted me to be president.” [5] Post election,
Bush’s propagandists, like David Frum, could employ phrases like
“axis of evil” for Bush’s State of the Union address on January 29,
2002. [6] It was sweet to the ears of his Religious Right constituency.
Bush is surrounded by theocon handlers like Frum, author of The
Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush. Chapter one
opens with “Missed you at Bible study.” Frum co-authored An End To
Evil: What's Next in the War on Terror with Project for a New
American Century (PNAC) charter member Richard Perle. Frum, like
other Bush associates, has the perfect credentials – he was a senior
fellow at the foundation-financed right-wing Manhattan Institute for
Public Policy Research from 1995 to 2001. [7]
Bush’s first use of the word “crusade” was five days after 9/11 and
divulged his Christian Zionist mentality. He said: “This is a new kind
of -- a new kind of evil. And we understand. And the American
people are beginning to understand. This crusade, this war on
terrorism is going to take a while.” [8] This fallacious war on terror
did not start with 9/11. Bush’s crusade, the Iraqi Invasion, was
repackaged and expensively sold as Operation Iraqi Liberation and
then Operation Iraqi Freedom. The benign words “liberation” and
“freedom” are Orwellian 1984 “newspeak” used to deceptively evoke
support for long term warfare. Bush recently discontinued using the
ambiguous phrase “stay the course.” He was asked its meaning at a
news conference on Oct. 11 but refused to be pinned down. [9]
“Stay the course means keep doing what you’re doing,” he said. “My
attitude is, don’t do what you’re doing if it’s not working; change.”
[10]
He added: “Stay the course also means don’t leave before the job is
done. And that’s — we’re going to get the job done in Iraq. And it’s
important that we do get the job done in Iraq.” [11] And what job is
that – the establishment of permanent military bases on one of the
earth’s biggest oil fields?
With continuous support from distinctive Christian theocons, Bush

professes that the Iraqi quagmire is a “good versus evil” crusade and
that he is on God’s errand. On June 4, 2003, Bush reportedly said:
“God told me to strike at al-Qaeda and I struck them, and then he
instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am
determined to solve the problem in the Middle East.” [12] He doesn’t
mention that al-Qaeda and Saddam were both established and
financed by the CIA. Nor does he acknowledge that monstrous sums
of taxpayer dollars are pumping up administration-friendly
companies who make millions of dollars as a result of the Iraqi
invasion. Claiming that God approves of the horrific death toll and
continuing violence against non threatening foreign citizens is a
shameful effort to cover the stench of death emanating from the
Middle East.
James Robison, the televangelist, met with Karl Rove and Governor
George Bush who told him: “I feel like God wants me to run for
president.” … “I can’t explain it, but I sense my country is going to
need me. I know it won’t be easy, on me or my family, but God wants
me to do it.” Robison set up a meeting with a group of major
Pentecostal and Southern Baptist preachers who gathered around
Governor Bush to lay hands on him. At another meeting “one pastor
led a prayer asking God to ‘put the mantle of a champion’ on Bush.”
[13]
You define a tree by its fruit. George Bush invaded Iraq without just
provocation despite his claims: “See, free nations are peaceful
nations. Free nations don't attack each other. Free nations don't
develop weapons of mass destruction.” [14] America, a “free” nation,
manufactures the majority of the world’s weapons, even those used
against our own military during warfare. America, a “free” nation,
invaded Iraq. According to Bush’s prerequisites, are we peaceful, are
we free?
Laura Bush, revising history, claimed: “No American President ever

wants to go to war. Abraham Lincoln didn't want to go to war, but he
knew saving the union required it. Franklin Roosevelt didn't want to
go to war—but he knew defeating tyranny demanded it. And my
husband didn't want to go to war, but he knew the safety and security
of America and the world depended on it.” [15] Humanitarian
justifications are always used by the privileged elite, before or after
the assault, to gain sympathetic support and to recruit canon fodder.
George W. Bush repeatedly claims that he has a direct pipeline to

God. When discussing the imminent Iraqi invasion with Pat
Robertson, “Bush insisted that he had a more direct pipeline to God
than the pope!” [16] In 2003, Bush appeared before a cheering crowd
at a Dallas Christian Youth Centre and told them about being “born
again.” Behind him were two banners: “King of Kings,” and the other
declared “Lord of Lords.” “The symbolism of how fervent Christianity
has become deeply entwined with the most powerful man on the
planet could not have been stronger.” [17]
This highly effective visual prepared for the impressionable is similar

to the cleverly maneuvered “Mission Accomplished” exploitation on
the correctly re-positioned USS Abraham Lincoln (minus San Diego
in the background) when he gave a speech May 1, 2003. [18] The USS
Abraham Lincoln and its sailors waited offshore for hours instead of
heading into port after its 10-month voyage. Or, how about staged
publicity production with the troops as props at Fort Bragg? Visual
manipulation appears to be a tactic employed by the best of the Bush
handlers, genius Karl Rove, “one of the most brilliant political
operatives ever.” [19]
In addition to using religion, “Rove re-packaged Bush as a brand.

Instead of a Yale graduate who was scion of a blue-blood Connecticut
family, Bush was presented as a straight-shooting Texan. Instead of
showing off his 10,000 square-foot house on an estate that is larger
than the Kennedy and Kerry compounds combined, Bush told
everyone he lived on a ranch. Instead of defending his being the only
presidential candidate ever convicted of a felony (drunk driving),
Bush shifted the debate to President Clinton’s adultery. While
hobnobbing with Enron CEO Ken Lay, indicted Tom DeLay and
influence-peddler Jack Abramoff, who has pled guilty to bribery of
top government officials, Bush adroitly ‘positioned’ himself as a
drugstore, truck-driving man.” [20]
“According to the General Accounting Office (GAO), Bush spends

more than four times on PR than any of his predecessors. His PR
department has twice as many employees as the Clinton
administration. Public relations agency Ketchum was paid more than
$1 million in taxpayer funds to produce video PR releases designed to
look like news reports. The Bush administration used $240,000 of
taxpayer money to pay conservative commentator Armstrong
Williams to promote Bush’s education policies.” [21]
It is all about perception management and Bush’s expensive PR team
will use any issue and spend any amount to create the right facade.
Bush is a multi-faceted international bank puppet who functions
according to any given situation or congregation, Jewish[22] or
Christian.
“Religion is the most dangerous energy source known to humankind.

The moment a person (or government or religion or organization) is
convinced that God is either ordering or sanctioning a cause or
project, anything goes. The history, worldwide, of religion-fueled
hate, killing, and oppression is staggering.” [23]
“Religious crusades are often counterproductive; they tend to end up

in unsustainable occupations of people who -- surprise! -- believe they
have their own pipeline to the Almighty.” [24] Three years plus after
the American invasion of Iraq, Americans are still dying along with
thousands of Iraqis in a war purportedly against terror. Iran is also in
the cross hairs. [25] The only benefactors are HalliburtonKBR,
Blackwater, Caci and L3Titan who are stepping over bodies to pick up
dollars.
Jerry Falwell, the religious leader of a 501C3 organization, endorsed

Bush by saying: “I believe it is the responsibility of every political
conservative, every evangelical Christian, every pro-life Catholic,
every traditional Jew, every Reagan Democrat, and everyone in
between to get serious about re-electing President Bush.” [26] The
New York Times, July 16, 2004
In certain cultures individuals attribute godly characteristics to their

top political leader. Bush facilitates this belief because he represents
himself as having a prophetic style of direct communication with
deity. With God’s alleged stamp of approval, attested to by numerous
religious leaders, it is easy to manipulate the constituency. On July 9,
2004 he told an Amish group: “I trust God speaks through me.
Without that, I couldn't do my job.” [27]
Jim Jones’s history may hold an answer to this phenomenon. “He not
only proved the obvious fact that people are blinded by their religious
beliefs and will only impute goodness, mercy, and religious
motivations to their leader, but Jim Jones proved the efficacy of the
basic teaching of Machiavelli: a leader must only appear to have the
qualities of goodness—he need not actually possess those attributes.”
[28] The illusion of goodness proves as effective as goodness itself.
“In fact, Machiavelli taught that it is dangerous for a leader to practice

goodness. Instead, he must pretend to be good and then do the
opposite. Machiavelli taught that a leader will succeed on
appearances alone. A good leader puts his finger to the wind and
changes course whenever it is expedient to do so.” [29]
“After the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House carefully scripted the
religious service in which the president declared war on terrorism
from the pulpit of the National Cathedral. The president declared to
the nation, ‘our responsibility to history is already clear: to answer
these attacks and rid the world of evil.’ With most every member of
the Cabinet and the Congress present, along with the nation's
religious leaders, it became a televised national liturgy affirming the
divine character of the nation's new war against terrorism, ending
triumphantly with the ‘Battle Hymn of the Republic.’ War against evil
would confer moral legitimacy on the nation's foreign policy and even
on a contested presidency.” [30]
“A simplistic ‘we are right and they are wrong’ theology rules out self-
reflection and correction. It also covers over the crimes America has
committed, which lead to widespread global resentment against us.”
[31] Power, without principle, is tyranny. Proud nations or people,
who suppose moral superiority, employ religious sentimentality and
arrogantly boast in their own strength are frequently left to their own
devices and ultimately fall into decadent destruction.
Jim Wallis reminds us that it matters more that we are on God’s side
instead of claiming God is on our side. Does God really play favorites
when both sides pray for assistance? Does God really care about who
wins the high school football game? Shouldn’t any issue, particularly
a life and death situation, be decided by correct principles rather than
who has the most advanced weapons, a preemptive advantage,
questionable motives and the most money and men?
Before the invasion, Bush said to a group of church leaders at the

National Association of Religious Broadcasters conference in
Nashville that he was totally “at peace” about striking the “evil”
Saddam Hussein. “If anyone can be at peace, I am at peace about
this.” Apparently this invasion had more to do with Bush’s religious
ideology than anything else that would possibly warrant an invasion.
Paul O’Neill, in his book The Price of Loyalty, states that “ideology
ruled the White House.” “Ideology is a lot easier, because you don’t
have to know anything or search for anything.” … “You already know
the answer to everything.” [32]
Go to Part 17
[1] Wead Helps Keep the Faith in Politics - Doug Wead - Interview
[2] The Tangled Roots of Doug Wead, Preacher, peddler, Beltway meddler
[3] Interview With Doug Wead
[4] Secret Tapes Not Meant to Harm, Writer Says
[6] Think Tanks
[7] David Frum
[8] Remarks by the President Upon Arrival, The South Lawn, 16 September 2001
Bush Abandons Phrase ‘Stay the Course’ on Iraq, New York Times, By Jim
[9]
Rutenberg and David S. Cloud, October 24, 2006
[10] Ibid
[11] Ibid
[12] With
God on Their Side, How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled Science, Policy,
and Democracy in George W. Bush’s White House by Esther Kaplan, p. 9
[13] Ibid p. 10-11
[14] President Bush Discusses Economy, Small Business in Wisconsin, October 3, 2003
[15] 2004 Republican National Convention
Bush says God chose him to lead his nation by Paul Harris, New York Sunday
[17]
November 2, 2003, The Observer
[18] President
Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended See also
'Mission Accomplished' Revisited
[19] George W. Bush, Branding Guru?
[20] George W. Bush, Branding Guru?
[21]Education Dept. paid commentator to promote law See also: Bush administration
blurs media boundary
[22] A Free Press, A Free Pass See also: The Vote of Orthodox Jews in the US Election
[23] Dangerous Religion - Bush's Theology of Empire
[24] With God on his side, By invoking a higher power, Bush sidesteps pesky
constitutional issues
[25] U.S. Planes Are Already Making Practice Bombing Runs Along Iran's Borders
Citing Falwell's Endorsement of Bush, Group Challenges His Tax-Exempt Status By

[26]
David D. Kirkpatrick,
Published: July 16, 2004
[27] The Mennonite Review
[28] The First Prince of the Theocratic States of America
[29] Ibid
Dangerous Religion - Bush's Theology of Empire by Jim Wallis, Sojourner’s

[30]
Magazine, September-October 2003
[31] Ibid
[32] With
God on Their Side, How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled Science, Policy,
and Democracy in George W. Bush’s White House by Esther Kaplan, p. 12
To avoid attracting spam email robots, email addresses on this site
are written with AT in place of the usual symbol. Replace AT with the
correct symbol to get a valid address.
Deanna Spingola's articles are copyrighted but may be republished, reposted, or

emailed. However, the person or organization must not charge for subscriptions
or advertising. The article must be copied intact and full credit given. Deanna's
web site address must also be included.
The New World Order, the Theocrat in Washington

Part 17
By Deanna Spingola
11 November 2006
General William G. “Jerry” Boykin, Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for

Intelligence, appeared at the Good Shepard Community Church in Boring,
Oregon in June 2003, not the first or last of such events. During his
multimedia presentation he stated: “Now ask yourself: Why is this man in
the White House? The majority of Americans did not vote for him. Why is
he there? … He’s in the White House because God put him there for a time
such as this. God put him there to lead not only this nation but to lead the
world in such a time as this.” [1]
He further stated, “We in the army of God, in the house of God, kingdom of
God, have been raised for such a time as this.” This is reminiscent of the
Old Testament phrase: “and who knoweth whether thou art come to the
kingdom for such a time as this?” [2] Some commentators, like Patrick
Buchanan, saw nothing wrong with what Boykin said. Others viewed any
hint of criticism as an attack on Christian values by the allegedly devious
Democratic Party. [3]
The concept that “God installed Bush” was disseminated by naïve pastors to
numerous congregations. Consequently, prior to the Iraqi invasion, James
Merritt, a former Southern Baptist Convention president, confirmed Bush’s
self-proclaimed status as “God’s man for this hour” particularly because of
the events of 9/11. [4] So God installed Bush as a defender, someone to lead
Americans into an immoral war? Yet this concept was disseminated
throughout Christendom and Bush became the new leader of the religious
right in America.
Another subtle selling of the Iraqi invasion is defined in the best-selling

book series Left Behind by Reverend Timothy LaHaye, one of the original
founders, along with Jerry Falwell of the Moral Majority. LaHaye is a past
president of the Council for National Policy, “a secretive forum, created in
1981, for leading US conservative political leaders, financiers and religious
right activist leaders.” Hatching plots behind the closed doors of secrecy
proves useful to the elitists. How many earth-shaking, secret societies does
the average person belong to? As mentioned in previous articles, Prescott,
George H. W. and George W. Bush all belonged to Skull & Bones, also
known as the Brotherhood of Death. Prescott, grandfather of George W,
provided financial aid to Hitler through the Union Banking Company of
which he was president. [5]
LaHaye’s novels, written with collaborator Jerry Jenkins, are allegedly based
on biblical prophecies about the return of Jesus after a battle between God
and Satan. It may have been what inspired the Southern Baptist Conference,
the largest Protestant denomination, to support the war in Iraq, despite their
official 2000 policy. [6] “Evangelicals have also supported the Bush
administration's campaign to democratize Iraq more consistently than most
other domestic groups, according to polls conducted earlier this year (2006)
by both Pew and Zogby International.” [7]
Many religious leaders have eschewed America’s current warfare. Of course

they cannot preach an anti-war sermon without retribution. [8] However,
religious leaders who endorse war, with its death and mutilation, rarely
suffer any negative consequences. War-loving leaders, with their minions,
are not unique as evidenced by former crusades, large and small. Bill Press
suggests the following war criteria:
• There must be a just cause for a war.
• A just war can be waged only as a last resort.
• The ultimate objective of war must be to bring peace.
• There must be serious prospect of success; bloodshed without hope of

victory cannot be justified.
• The war must be declared by a legitimate authority; no private

individuals or groups can launch a war.
• The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury

suffered.
• Noncombatants must not be intentionally harmed.
• Prisoners and conquered peoples must be treated justly. [9]
Iraq did not perpetuate 9/11 and had no plans or military capacity to attack
the United States. [10] Anti-war, demonized Democrats are not seen as
compassionate, caring, or even Christian but simply unpatriotic or un-
American. Yet, despite their “godlessness,” they regularly appear more
Christian and compassionate than the religiously correct Republicans. No, I
am not a Democrat nor a Republican.
Some theocons, assembled as the Apostolic Congress, work “hand in hand”
with Bush to develop domestic and Middle East policies. Apparently, our
elected Congress has again abdicated their responsibility to others who
apparently dictate policy that is compatible with their “end-time rapture”
objectives.
“The problem is not that George W. Bush is discussing policy with people
who press right-wing solutions to achieve peace in the Middle East, or with
devout Christians. It is that he is discussing policy with Christians who
might not care about peace at all -- at least until the rapture.” [11] On the
other hand, Bush refused to meet with Jim Wallis and his organization, Call
to Renewal, to discuss a peaceful, weaponless alternative to the Iraqi
invasion. [12]
Nonetheless, Bush did accept a suggestion from Wallis before the

inauguration:
“In December 2000, Bush sat in the classroom of a Baptist church in Austin,
Texas, with 30 or so clergy members and asked, ‘How do I speak to the soul
of the nation?’ … In one cluster, Bush and Wallis talked of their journeys.”
“I've never lived around poor people,” Wallis remembers Bush saying. “I
don't know what they think. I really don't know what they think. I'm a white
Republican guy who doesn't get it. How do I get it?” Not a shocking
statement from a member of the elite country club set – born in the lap of
luxury with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth! His privileged status,
rather than his qualifications, installed him at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
“Wallis recalls replying, “You need to listen to the poor and those who live
and work with poor people.”
“Bush called over his speechwriter, Michael Gerson, and said, ‘I want you to
hear this.’ A month later, an almost identical line – ‘many in our country do
not know the pain of poverty, but we can listen to those who do’ -- ended up
in the inaugural address.” [13]
Self-righteousness, frequently a by-product of fundamentalism, is dangerous

whether it is Christian, Islam, or any other religion. Dr. Calvin Morris,
executive director of the Chicago-based Community Renewal Society, told
World Magazine (Marvin Olasky is the magazine's editor-in-chief), “It is
ironic, and dangerously so, that the present Bush administration rails against
the religious fundamentalism of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, while asserting a
similar fundamentalism of its own. This administration needs to realize that
God is not an adherent of American foreign policy, but a God above all
nations and ideologies.” [14]
This “crusade” against terror is stripping citizens of their constitutionally-

guaranteed freedoms. War on anything - drugs, poverty, crime, cancer, Aids,
pornography or terrorism – is bogus. Most frequently it constitutes money
going from the voter’s pockets into the pockets of big business without any
recognizable benefit to the citizens. Our current “war on terrorism”
constitutes a war against individual freedoms. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, in
speaking about military warfare, reminded us: “A state of war only serves as
an excuse for domestic tyranny.” [15]
“I apprehend no danger to our country from a foreign foe... Our destruction,

should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of
the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and
negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger.” Daniel
Webster [16]
Any leader who wishes to accrue power or improve ratings can use war,
without the troublesome ordeal of constitutional congressional approval. “Of
course, as a self-described ‘messenger’ of God who was ‘praying for
strength to do the Lord's will,’ Bush was not troubled about shredding a little
secular document called the U.S. Constitution.” [17]
Some fundamentalists are attempting to establish a “God-centered

government” with total control over every aspect of our lives. This intolerant
control would eliminate all religious freedom, except that proscribed by the
ruling party. Our government is only obliged to punish illegal behavior, not
satanically exercise control over individual beliefs and conscience. Many
Christian fundamentalists endorse punitive punishment, harsh sentencing for
all criminals, nuclear war, and starving sanctions for tens of thousands. They
adamantly endorse death yet vehemently oppose, often with violence,
abortion. Is it genuine opposition or “stone-throwing” judgments against
assumed “evil” behavior or is it about unrighteous dominion (control)? What
is it with some Christians who justify selective violence? Where is Christian
mercy in this so-called godly-genocidal war?
Across the globe, our military is enforcing democracy on oil-rich Iraq while
obliterating evil-doers – that is, anyone who resists occupation. Hitler
focused on the Jews, Bush, not as definitive, focuses on obscure terrorists
and open-ended warfare. Not surprisingly, Hitler joined a secret society, the
Thule Society in 1919 whose membership later became the foundation of the
Nazi Party. [18] He apparently did whatever was required to gain support
and power including the manipulation of religion. He said: “Hence today I
believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator:
by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the
Lord.” [19] Hitler, despite claims to the contrary was an alleged Christian;
he manipulated the religious populace and successfully, subtly merged
religion and politics, with appropriate photo ops and speeches, all for
political power with its inherent financial perks and big bucks for the
military-industrial-complex. It is all about control, money and the resources
of the earth!
German Soldiers wore belt buckles inscribed with the following: "Gott mit
uns" (God is with us). Hitler’s troops were frequently sprinkled with holy
water by the priests. Before fascism, before Hitler and his political power
grab, facilitated by the Reichstag fire, Germany was a Christian country
whose obedient citizens were programmed and propagandized to blindly
follow all authority figures, political and ecclesiastical. No questions asked!
“The Nazis demonized and then destroyed their enemies, after first
intimidating and then liquidating their domestic opponents. The German
propaganda machine cranked out misinformation and outright lies in the
state-supported media, suppressing the truth and threatening anyone who
dared to speak or print opposition to the war regime.” [20] “Never forget
that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal.” Rev. Martin Luther King
Jr.
“Hitler never abandoned the cloak of legality; he recognized the enormous

psychological value of having the law (as well as the church) on his side.
Instead, he turned the law inside out and made illegality legal.” Historian
Alan Bullock
Repetitive war indoctrination and American imperialism have replaced the

Sermon on the Mount. Twisting the scriptures for theocon political
objectives is trusting in the “arm of flesh.” [21] We need to distinguish truth
amongst the “many kinds of voices” abroad in the land. None of them are
without significance. [22] Christians need to wake up, speak up and stand up
for genuine Christian ideals!
One of the fourteen defining characteristics of fascism is: “Religion and

Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the
most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion.
Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders,
even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the
government's policies or actions.” [23] Obviously, the common religion in
America is Christianity.
“A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion.
Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they
consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move
against him, believing that he has the gods on his side.” [24]
“When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the Flag - and

Carrying a Cross.” [25] Sinclair Lewis
Allegedly, scripturally-based churches are granting allegiance to the

government and their mass mutilation and killing of strangers. Do we
actually believe that the lives of foreigners have less value than our own?
Silent Christian spectators acquiesce to and even participate in those
atrocities, fueled by ardent nationalism and indoctrinated against an alleged
enemy. We are not answerable to our government employees (the elected).
We cannot justifiably say “I was just following orders.” The government is
accountable to the electorate. We are all, however, accountable to God.
Go to Part 18
[1]With God on Their Side How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled Science, Policy,
and Democracy in George W. Bush’s White House by Esther Kaplan, p. 21 See also How
the Republicans Stole Christmas by Bill Press, p. 11
[2] Old Testament, Esther 4:14
[3] William G. Boykin
[5] George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin
[7] Christian Evangelicals and U.S. Foreign Policy

[8] Religious Right Needs To Defend All Saints Episcopal by Chuck Baldwin
[10] Ibid p. 80
[11] In Line for the Rapture, See also Stop Spiritual Abuse
Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush By Ron Suskind, Published:
[13]
October 17, 2004 See also:
Inaugural Address of President George W. Bush, 2001
[14] Bush, religious right target churches
[15] Quotations Regarding War
[16] Daniel Webster Quotes
[17] With God on His Side... by Robert Scheer
[18] Tell me More About Adolf Hitler and WWII
Mein Kampf, Volume 1, Chapter 2, Years of Study and Suffering in Vienna by

[19]
Adolph Hitler
[20] Achtung! Are We the New Nazis? Soldiers, God and Empire by Douglas Herman
[21] Jeremiah 17:5
[22] 1 Corinthians 14:10
[23] Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism By Dr. Lawrence Britt
[24] Quote by Aristotle
[25] Sinclair Lewis, The quote comes from the novel “It Can't Happen Here,” published in
1935.
also be included.
The New World Order, Separation of Church & Hate

Part 18
By Deanna Spingola
18 November 2006
According to the globalists, the Constitution must be crushed in order to

establish global governance. Every freedom must be revoked; the Bill of
Rights must be misrepresented with persuasive propaganda from the most
trusted sources. The entire deceptive operation must appear to benefit the
masses. It must be shrewdly executed with focused determination or the
populace may awaken and revolt.
“The religious persecution that drove settlers from Europe to the British
North American colonies sprang from the conviction, held by Protestants
and Catholics alike, that uniformity of religion must exist in any given
society. This conviction rested on the belief that there was one true religion
and that it was the duty of the civil authorities to impose it, forcibly if
necessary, in the interest of saving the souls of all citizens.” [1]
Religious intolerance and persecution is rampant in many countries. Because
of the religious intolerance directed at my own ancestors I am adamant about
separation of church and state. Religious reformer John Rogers, a distant but
direct ancestor (11th great grandfather), was burned at the stake on February
4, 1555 at Smithfield, near Warwick, Nottinghamshire, England during the
reign of Mary Tudor. He was a close associate of William Tyndale and an
editor of the “Matthew Bible.” Rogers was the first British Protestant martyr
under Queen Mary. “On the Monday morning of his death, the Sheriff had
shown Rogers a document promising pardon if he would recant. ‘That which
I have preached with my lips will I seal with my blood,’ was the answer.”
[2]
The Constitution established our federal government. That document is a

two way agreement; it is every citizen’s social contract with their
government. Accordingly, all of our rights are protected – except the ones
we willingly give up. Driven by government-provoked fear, we frequently
give up sovereignty for alleged security. We are relinquishing, little by little,
our God-given freedoms and will eventually wake up enslaved in a
tyrannical, controlling state.
Mass persuasion by public officials, news commentators, teachers and some

church leaders falsely claim that we live in a democracy rather than a
republic. Some of those same individuals claim that “separation of church
and state” is not a constitutional concept. Repetitive lies, accepted as fact,
soon gain acceptance by those who fail to read the available documents.
“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one
fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly... it must confine itself to
a few points and repeat them over and over.”— Joseph Goebbels, Nazi
Propaganda Minister.
Individual rights were completely absent from the first draft of the
Constitution. “Unless assured that a bill of rights would be passed, many
states threatened to withhold ratification of the Constitution. Consequently,
in 1789, the First Congress of the United States adopted the first ten
amendments to the Constitution, known collectively as the Bill of Rights.
Ratification of these amendments by the required number of states occurred
in 1791.” [3]
First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment

of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Madison’s first draft of the First Amendment read: “The civil rights of none
shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any
national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of
conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.” [4] It is highly
significant that religion, of all the liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights, is
the very first freedom mentioned. The First Amendment, possibly the most
important in the Bill of Rights, enumerates five freedoms: religion, speech,
press, assembly, and petition. Those God-given freedoms facilitate
individual participation in the process of self-government.
The Bill of Rights pertains to and was designed to protect the individual
rights of each and every person. The specific tenets of the Bill of Rights
were not rights granted to the government, an artificial body created by the
citizens. The right of “free exercise” pertains to individuals, not to
government. Therefore, a government entity or any person representing that
entity cannot claim or seize “free exercise.” The “free exercise” of an
individual’s religion, not the government’s religion, is constitutional.
Consequently, a government employee may not constitutionally direct any
type of religious observance while functioning in that government-sponsored
occupation.
The Religious Right and their minions endorse their versions of school
prayer. My children attended school to study math, grammar, penmanship,
history, biology, science, and to enhance their already developed reading
skills. I did not send them to school to learn to pray. We pray regularly in
our home and at church. Citizens should not be obligated to pay taxes for
students to learn how to pray. Given America’s diversity, what kind of a
prayer would it be: Catholic, Baptist, Seventh-day Adventist, Episcopalian,
Jewish, Methodist, Mormon? Which students are going to feel discomfort or
suffer mild to aggressive persecution for not being the “right” religion? Will
the students who belong to the “right” religion feel compelled to openly pray
for the “sinful” student – to save his or her soul from hell? Governments
should not sponsor any activity that contributes or provokes persecution or
aggression towards others based on religion or ethnicity.
“The Establishment Clause thus stands as an expression of principle on the

part of the founders of our Constitution that religion is too personal, too
sacred, too holy, to permit its ‘unhallowed perversion’ by a civil magistrate.
Another purpose of the Establishment Clause rested upon an awareness of
the historical fact that governmentally established religions and religious
persecutions go hand in hand.” [5]
Thomas Jefferson stated: “No provision in our Constitution ought to be

dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the
enterprises of the civil authority.”
Despite the intentionally secular foundation of the constitution, there have

been and will continue to be controversial court cases, many perpetuated by
stables of high-priced attorneys retained by different factions of the
Religious Right to publicize the questionable premise that America’s
Christians are consistently persecuted. The actual objective of such lawsuits
is to outrage the voters who will then demand specific religious freedoms
even if it means incremental loss of religious freedoms or discrimination for
others. The very people who should make every effort to protect religious
freedom are, in fact, jeopardizing it.
In colonial times, many European monarchs referred to their nations as

Christian countries. However, sinners and hypocrites comprised the bulk of
their local populace. Nations, like people, are defined by their national
character and moral fortitude. To the colonial, Roger Williams, residency in
a particular place did not equate to Christianity. [6] Likewise, given our
duplicitous propensity for class discrimination, abortion, offensive war, the
economic destabilization of other countries and deathly sanctions, referring
to America as a Christian nation casts super serious doubt upon our
interpretation of a Christian.
Many, particularly in the Religious Right, claim that the United States was
established as a Christian nation rather than a free nation. They perpetuate
this erroneous theory in order to attract other morally upright people who
might naïvely embrace the Religious Right’s spurious agenda. However, to
appeal to others, they downplay the word “Christian” and include others
they may have previously attempted to discredit as non Christian. “By
referring more ecumenically to the United States as a religious nation, they
invite other religious traditions to join a family-values crusade launched
originally by a particular form of Christian faith.” … “A shift in rhetorical
strategy to widen political appeal does not affect the substantive issues at
stake.” [7]
Every decent person is for “family values” but not through government
enforcement. People who endorse separation of church and state do not hate
religion! Justifiable objections arise when some “Christian leaders” demand
that their particular version of religion be incorporated into the nation’s
laws.
In every age, religious advocates have attempted to influence others through

government enforcement. Individuals seeking political office frequently use
religion to draw support from the religious community. Campaign customs
have significantly changed in the last four to five decades. Candidates
discuss ideology instead of specific political issues that detrimentally affect
every single citizen. View one of John F. Kennedy’s campaign speeches and
then evaluate contemporary candidate rhetoric – it is a night and day
difference.
The founding fathers had respect for religion and it is because of that respect
that they resisted some of the religious leaders of the day and refrained from
merging the operations of government with religion. To serve Dominionist
goals, it is relatively easy to harvest ambiguous quotes from the founders
that appear to endorse the merging of church and state. There are sufficient
public examples that history revisionists use to “prove” that religion and
politics are compatible.
The phrase “In God we trust” is on our money as a result of the pressure and
ranting of Horace Bushnell, a Connecticut preacher, who said that the Civil
War was “divine retribution” for America’s acceptance of “speculative and
infidel” ideas that government was not ordained by God. It is a blasphemous
insult to put God’s very name on worthless paper printed by the international
bankers who hijacked our economy and are currently draining America’s
resources. The majority of people may actually trust money and the power it
gives more than they trust God. In today’s corrupt climate, anyone can
literally “buy anything in the world for money” and it is outrageous to attach
God’s name to filthy lucre, made filthier by the mass destruction that it
causes in the hands of those who seek total control.
“Render, therefore, to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the
things that are God’s.” –Mark 13:17 and Luke 20:25
Blaming Lincoln’s war of northern aggression on infidels is akin to some

current religious leaders who claim that 9/11 is the result of our country’s
homosexual tolerance. Falwell remarked: “I really believe that the pagans,
and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are
actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For
the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point
the finger in their face and say ‘you helped this happen.’” [8] How
discomforting that some religious leaders, who have similar, though secret
lifestyles, reject individuals and dispel them from their midst rather than
inviting everyone into their realm in order to love and teach them. Isn’t it
time that we separate church and hate. What happened to true worship –
emulation?
Perhaps Falwell’s apology was insincere considering that he continues to

define others in negative terms such as being anti-Christ. This “Christian”
preacher’s unabashed comments are regularly heard in the “conservative,”
administration-friendly media. [9] This is so radically different from his
methodology before he combined his abilities with those who spearheaded
the most current assault on the religious clauses within the First
Amendment.
The suddenly star-struck Falwell was a typical preacher who understood the
gospel process up until his merger with the ultra conservative New Right.
Falwell said the following during the civil rights movement of the 1960s:
“We have a message of redeeming grace through a crucified and risen Lord.
Nowhere are we told to reform the externals. We are not told to wage a war
against bootleggers, liquor stores, gamblers, murderers, prostitutes,
racketeers, prejudiced persons or institutions, or any other existing evil as
such. The gospel does not clean up the outside but rather regenerates the
inside.” [10]
Changing society begins with changing oneself. Religious practitioners need

to address the individuals in their congregations – that is their job. The
churches must get back to doing what they are supposed to do – not lobby
government officials to instill additional mountains of repressive, bigoted
regulations designed to disenfranchise certain groups and strip others of their
individual freedoms. That is hardly moral or just. Morality, especially from
an apparently immoral human entity like the government, cannot come from
the top down. It will deliver quite the opposite.
Many prefer fast food religion rather than repentance and “feasting upon the
word of God.” Repentance changes hearts which then results in better
behavior including a desire to bury the weapons of war, support peace and
view one’s alleged enemies in a completely different light. Good behavior as
a result of government enforcement, a function that many want the
government to assume, does not impact the heart and soul.
Personally, I would not entrust a government that kills the citizens of weaker
countries with the task of saving my soul. Nor would I trust the very vocal
religious practitioners who support such senseless slaughter. It appears that
many individuals, including religious leaders, have created the “Uncle Sam”
golden calf. Rather than self-reliance, a by-product of accepting
responsibility and repenting for one’s own behavior, many rely upon “Uncle
Sam” to solve every dilemma or enforce better behavior. It is all a diabolical
deception to strip us all of our free agency and the very ideals and principles
we cherish.
Go to Part 19
[1] America as a Religious Refuge: The Seventeenth Century
Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, Chapter XVI -- Persecutions in England During the Reign of
[2]
Queen Mary
[3] Individual Rights
[4] 1 Annals of Congress 434 (June 8, 1789)
Engel vs. Vitale, US Supreme Court, Decided June 25, 1962, Hugo Lafayette Black,
[5]
Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court
The Godless Constitution, the Case Against Religious Correctness by Isaac Kramnick
[6]
& R. Laurence Moore, p. 51
[7] Ibid, p. 13
[8] Falwell apologizes to gays, feminists, lesbians
[9] Falwell called NOW "the National Order of Witches"

[10] Jerry Falwell,as quoted in Jerome L. Himmelstein, To the Right, University of
California Press, Berkeley, 1990, p. 118 as quoted in Blinded by Might, Can the religious
Right Save America? By Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson, p. 85
also be included.
The New World Order, Following the Filthy Lucre

Part 19
By Deanna Spingola
1 January 2007
Opposition in all things, necessary for personal growth, allows for the
existence of evil, personified by Lucifer, provocateur of all contention.
Lucifer, the usurper, stealthily strives to strip everyone of their freedom,
establish his allegedly classless, democratic dominion by working through
compliant, ego-driven leaders seeking “the glory of the world.” Armed with
the enticing temptations of earth’s abundant treasures and pleasures, just
imagine Lucifer’s success rate when he offers even more prosperity and
power to unprincipled people. Lucifer and his insatiable minions seek
totality through force and thus must rule with “blood and horror on the face
of the earth.” Lucifer has always induced certain character-weak, often
morally-compromised individuals to unite into secret societies or
associations to carry out his ultimate, opposing-God objective of a New
World Order.
Though the “powers of darkness prevail upon the earth,” we “know not the
hearts of the men in our own nation” particularly because many Americans
suffer from a media-induced state of ignorance. We are over-run with secret
societies, where power-seeking participants swear allegiance to each other
through secret oaths. They are all working towards the same satanical
objective and attempt to function and influence every aspect of society and
culture. Nations that uphold the disease-like spread of secret societies, large
or small, are ripe for destruction.
“Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; that
made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened
not the house of his prisoners?” [1]
From the Civil War forward, war has been poured out upon all nations.
Many erroneously believe that the Civil War was about abolishing slavery, a
despicable institution. The war was about tariffs, protecting certain
industries and ultimately strengthening the federal government. The
fallacious justification of liberating the slaves followed the deaths of at least
618,000 people. [2] War was unnecessary – there were alternatives. The
same neoconservative do-gooder, “ending tyranny in our world” [3] mental
manipulation is used in the current “democracy-building” efforts of the U.S.
Bringing liberty to the world, America’s quest, apparently requires
demolition of infrastructure, bombs, bloodshed, carnage, depleted uranium,
white phosphorus or napalm, occupation and permanent military bases. War
and reconstruction produce big money and thin out the population on both
sides.
Bloodshed and famine attend the carnage of combat and rumors of wars. [4]
Rumors of war (hearsay) are frequently propagated by corrupt, compromised
officials to justify preemptive “shock and awe” bombing campaigns against
defenseless civilians. We resist taking the first shot but rather rely on
sanctions or embargoes to provoke response. If those fail, responding to a
Northwoods style attack would be justified.
The U.S. battleship Maine sank as a result of an explosion in Havana Harbor

on February 15, 1898. This was during William McKinley’s presidency. He
was known as a defender of the gold standard. He was against a full-blown
war, preferring diplomacy instead. Though it was later determined to be an
internal explosion, it was blamed on the Spanish. After hearing reports of
Spanish atrocities in Cuba, the U.S. “liberated” the Cubans. Americans
continue to fall for the atrocity claims. Combat ensued between America and
Spain which culminated on August 12, 1898. Two days later, the U.S. sent
11,000 occupational troops to the Philippines. The Filipinos resisted the U.S.
liberation for three years. [5] An estimated 200,000 to 1,000,000 Filipino
civilians were killed. Approximately 16,000 Filipinos were killed in combat.
By contrast, only 4,200 American soldiers were killed. [6]
For $20 million dollars Spain ceded the Philippine Islands, Puerto Rico and
Guam to the United States in the Paris Peace Treaty signed on December 10,
1898 and ratified by the United States Senate on February 6, 1899. It became
effective on April 11, 1899. “Many people did not approve of America
seizing territory far from its shores, but McKinley, who agonized over the
decision, finally approved the takeover.” [7]
McKinley was re-elected in 1900 and was shot on September 6, 1901 at 4:07
p.m. at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York by an alleged
emotionally demented anarchist, Leon Czolgosz. Patsies are always young,
demented and alone. McKinley died of his wounds on September 14, 1901
and was succeeded by pro-war Theodore Roosevelt. [8] It is significant that
of forty-three presidents, eight have been the target of “assassins.” Four of
those presidents died. [9]
In some instances, politicians have very personal reasons to comply with
their New World Order handlers. Woodrow Wilson, son of a Presbyterian
minister, had the financial and political support of the Rockefellers, Jacob
Schiff, Bernard Baruch, and others in his successful 1910 bid for governor
of New Jersey. Coincidentally, they also had the love letters he wrote to
Mary Peck, his mistress while he was president of Princeton (1902-1910),
for which they paid $65,000. [10] Therefore he made the perfect morally
compromised presidential candidate. He was certainly not the first or the last
who was installed because of the contents of his private closet.
Paul Warburg, a Republican, contributed a substantial amount of money to

Wilson’s presidential campaign. His brother made similar contributions to
the incumbent William Howard Taft. Theodore Roosevelt, the third
candidate and opposed to a central bank, ran under his new Bull Moose
Party. George Perkins and Frank Munsey of the J. P. Morgan Company
poured money into both the Roosevelt and Taft campaigns which split the
vote and gave the election to Wilson. [11] A financial coup took place in
1913. We are financially insolvent. Our national treasures have been seized
by international loan sharks.
In 1916 President Woodrow Wilson said: “I am a most unhappy man. I have

unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its
system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the
nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We
have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a
government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the
vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small
group of dominant men.” [12]
Wall Street financed the Chinese revolution of 1912, the Mexico Revolution
in 1915-16, the Panama Canal controversy of 1913. “The purpose of the
revolution was to deprive Colombia, of which Panama was then a part, of
$40 million and to acquire control of the Panama Canal.” [13]
Wall Street financed the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 prior to World War I.
“Documents in the State Department files demonstrate that the National City
Bank, controlled by Stillman and Rockefeller interests, and the Guaranty
Trust, controlled by Morgan interests, jointly raised substantial loans for the
belligerent Russia before U.S. entry into the war, and that these loans were
raised after the State Department pointed out to these firms that they were
contrary to international law. Further, negotiations for the loans were
undertaken through official U.S. government communications facilities
under cover of the top-level ‘Green Cipher’ of the State Department.” …
“Clearly the Morgan-Rockefeller interests were not interested in abiding by
international law. … There was no hesitation on the part of these firms to
use State Department facilities for the negotiations. Further, in spite of
protests, the State Department allowed the messages to go through.” [14]
“During World War I Germany raised considerable funds in New York for
espionage and covert operations in North America and South America. It is
important to record the flow of these funds because it runs from the same
firms — Guaranty Trust and American International Corporation — that
were involved in the Bolshevik Revolution and its aftermath.” [15] An
estimated six to twelve million Russians were killed by Stalin prior to World
War II. Several million were killed after the war when Roosevelt delivered
one-third of Europe to Stalin as part of the settlement conferences. [16]
The planning of the Second World War started in 1919 after Adolf Hitler
had joined a secret society called the Thule Society. The Society was not a
working-man's group as it included amongst its members: “judges, police-
chiefs, barristers, lawyers, university professors and lecturers, aristocratic
families, leading industrialists, surgeons, physicians, scientists, as well as a
host of rich and influential bourgeois.” The membership of the Thule
Society also became the foundation of the Nazi Party. [17]
Wall Street financed Hitler and his proposed 1,000 year Reich. It was
supposedly a failure but it produced profits and supplied the United States
with practical experience through CIA-transplanted German war criminals
who were expert in segregation and concentration camp logistics,
propaganda tactics, group-think mentality, crisis psychology via the
orchestrated Reichstag fire and continued medical and eugenics
experimentation. “The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German
eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked
in before he went to Auschwitz.” [18] Former “enemies,” now associates
contributed their scientific “expertise” to the ongoing globalist momentum in
America. The devastating chaos of World War II, with death, destruction
and the political realignment of the nations – divvied up with previous allies
now redefined as cold war “enemies,” failed to implement the New World
Order.
What was referred to as the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), America’s

first intelligence agency, established June 13, 1942, developed world-wide
clandestine capability and employed almost 13,000 men and women. [19]
One of the functions of OSS was to organize and conduct psychological

warfare. Psychological warfare, a propaganda tactic with any government
that wants to marshal the troops, includes “a constant repetition of fabricated
atrocity stories which are designed to prove that the enemy were all ‘bad
guys’ who had to be eliminated so we ‘good guys’ could live in peace.” [20]
“OSS, ended on October 1, 1945, trained many of the leaders and personnel
who formed the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Their ranks included
four future Directors of Central Intelligence: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms,
William Colby, and William Casey.” [21] Personnel and the assets
ultimately went into a new organization called the Central Intelligence
Group (CIG) until the National Security Act of 1947 turned CIG into the
Central Intelligence Agency. CIA ranks have swollen dramatically since
then probably to include a patsy department where people are properly
schooled as perpetrators yet who make dramatic appearances in public prior
to their “crime” and leave sufficient evidence for miraculous discovery.
“Allen Dulles was the OSS chief of European operations during World War
II and was quite active in post-war covert schemes, such as Operation
Paperclip and Operation National Interest, to move Nazi personnel and
assets out of Germany and into the American sphere.”
George Herbert Walker, along with partner Averell Harriman, established

W. A. Harriman & Co. Bank in November 1919. In 1926 Prescott S. Bush
was installed as Vice-President of W. A. Harriman & Co. In 1928, W. A.
Harriman bought Dresser Industries, paying $4,000,000 for Dresser's
corporate stock and made it a public company by issuing 300,000 shares of
stock. Neil Mallon, with no experience in the oil business, was installed as
company president. Prescott Bush was the banking representative who
helped finance the deal that established Dresser and served on the company's
board. [22] Dresser produced the incendiary bombs that were used on
Tokyo. [23] Dresser also made gaseous diffusion pumps for the Manhattan
atomic bomb project. [24] Prescott financed Hitler through the Union
Banking Corporation. [25]
In 1931 Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. merged with W. A. Harriman &
Co., the railroad empire. The Harriman railroads shipped oil for John D.
Rockefeller of Standard Oil. Samuel P. Bush, father of Prescott, owned
Buckeye Steel Castings Co. which manufactured parts for the Harriman
railroad company. [26] During World War II Prescott was a director of two
companies – Dresser Industries, oil field equipment manufacturer, and until
recently a part of Halliburton, and the second was Vanadium Corporation of
America. “They were both involved in atomic energy projects.” [27]
“George H. W. Bush worked for Dresser Industries in several positions after

the war, from 1948-1951.” [28] Dresser Industries acquired M.W. Kellogg,
an oil services company, in 1988. On September 29, 1998, Dresser formally
merged with rival company Halliburton. Dick Cheney, a long-time member
of the CFR, negotiated the $7.7 billion deal. [29] Halliburton then issued 176
million new shares of its common stock to Dresser shareholders. [30] On 10
April 2001 the Dresser division (excluding the former Kellogg division)
entered an agreement to separate itself from Halliburton because of “more
than 300,000 asbestos claims filed against a Dresser subsidiary located in
Pennsylvania that made construction products containing the substance.”
[31] Halliburton “split its operations into two distinct entities in order to
protect its assets from the asbestos litigation. Halliburton positioned
Kellogg, Brown & Root under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. [32]
It would have cost Halliburton billions, in both cash and stock, to settle the
asbestos claims. [33] This is despite the Bush administration’s attempts to
get Congress to limit asbestos liability. But, Arlen Specter has come to the
rescue with his Asbestos Trust Fund Bill, purportedly to help victims. I
wonder – would this fund assist the numerous victims of 9/11 in as much as
the asbestos dissemination was the result of alleged “terrorists,” or would it
reduce government financial culpability? Now, Halliburton’s liability will be
limited to $450 million. Halliburton, with government contracts, recovered
and their purchase of Dresser possibly saved the Dresser stockholders,
perhaps even Bush family stock? [34] It wouldn’t be the first time!
Halliburton’s support of Lyndon Johnson resulted in several contracts

including the construction of military bases during the Vietnam War. After
the Persian Gulf War in 1991, then-Defense Secretary Cheney, who directed
our first invasion of Iraq, paid Brown & Root to conduct “a study on the
benefits of military outsourcing.” Months later, Cheney paid them an
additional $5 million to update the report. “In 1992, Brown & Root was
awarded the U.S. Army's first Logistics Civil Augmentation Program
(LOGCAP) contract, an omnibus contract that allows the Army to call on
KBR for support in all of its field operations, including combat,
peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance.” [35]
“On March 24, 2003, the Army announced publicly that KBR had been
awarded five task orders in Iraq potentially worth $7 billion to implement
the plan.” “KBR was awarded a $100 million contract in 2002 to build a new
U.S. embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, from the State Department.” “KBR has
also been awarded 15 LOGCAP task orders worth more than $216 million
for work under ‘Operation Enduring Freedom,’ the military name for
operations in Afghanistan. These include establishing base camps at
Kandahar and Bagram Air Force Base and training foreign troops from the
Republic of Georgia.” “On Feb. 27, 2004, the Coalition Provisional
Authority's Program Management Office in Baghdad awarded KBR a
contract worth nearly $51.5 million for "electrical power transmission" in
Iraq.” [36]
Go to Part 20
[1] Old Testament, Isaiah 14:12 - 18
[2] The Price in Blood! Casualties in the Civil War
[3] President Sworn-In to Second Term
[4] New Testament, Matthew 24:6
[5] Warfare, the Road to Globalization, Part 1, By Deanna Spingola
[6] American invasion
[7] William McKinley
[8] Ibid
[9] US Presidents: Lists and Records
[10]The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat
Riott, pg. 20
[11] Ibid, page 21-22
[12] The Money Masters, How the International Bankers Gained Control of America
[13] Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony Sutton
[14] Ibid
[15] Ibid
[16] A Century of War: Lincoln, Wilson, and Roosevelt by John V. Denson, p. 17

[17] Tell me More About Adolf Hitler and WWII
[18] The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics By Edwin Black
[19] What
Was OSS Many OSS Records have recently been declassified: Report to the
IWG on Previously Classified OSS Records, June, 2000
[20] The Mind of Adolf Hitler, the Secret Wartime Report by Walter C. Langer, p. 4
[21] An End & A Beginning
Neil Mallon Bush - Source Watch See also George Bush: The Unauthorized
[22]
Biography by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin, Chapter -VIII- The Permian Basin
Gang, 1948-59
[23]Bush Family Values: War, Wealth, Oil, Four generations have created an unsavory
web of links that could prove an election-year Achilles' heel for the president by Kevin
Phillips
[24] World War II Industrial Facilities: Authorized Federal Funding & World War II
Industrial Facilities: Authorized Federal Funding
[25] Prescott Bush, the Union Banking Corporation and The Story
[26] Brown Brothers Harriman
[27] Skull & Bones: The Secret Society That Unites John Kerry and President Bush
[28] Dresser Industries
[29] Ibid
[30] 1998 Press Releases, Halliburton and Dresser Complete Merger
[31] Windfalls of War: Kellogg, Brown & Root (Halliburton)
[32] Ibid
[33]Halliburton Pays Dearly but Finally Escapes Cheney's Asbestos Mess By Allan
Sloan, Tuesday, January 11, 2005
[34] Ibid
[35] Windfalls of War: Kellogg, Brown & Root (Halliburton)
[36] Ibid
Comment: deannaATspingola.com

Back to Spingola Speaks
also be included.
The New World Order, Terror for Profit

Part 20
By Deanna Spingola
6 January 2007
Many have acknowledged secretive entities, like the CIA, but have been
persuaded that this corrupt organization has a legitimate function – like
deterring communism or spreading democracy (socialism). It was actually
created for several purposes – one of which is assisting multinational
business. This often includes assassination, military coups, overthrowing
democratic leaders, drug trafficking, staging riots, and destabilizing
countries. [1] Natural resources are regularly seized through violent
contrived circumstances as a consequence of private allegiances in corporate
chambers, secret societies or government offices.
One of the individuals who came up with the blueprint for the CIA was
Robert A. Lovett, a former board member of Brown Brothers Harriman.
Lovett “was the fourth United States Secretary of Defense, serving in the
cabinet of President Harry S. Truman from 1951 to 1953 and in this
capacity, directed the Korean War. He was promoted to the position from
deputy secretary of defense.” Coincidently, he was a member of the Skull
and Bones society at Yale University. [2] Lovett, “father of the CIA,” was
nominated for the Brotherhood of Death by Prescott Bush, Neil Mallon, and
Roland Harriman. One of George H. W. Bush’s sons was named after
Mallon: Neil Mallon Bush, born January 22, 1955. Mallon was a one-time
president of Dresser Industries. [3]
Though not CIA, it is interesting that Neil Mallon Bush, of Hinckley and
Silverado fame, owner of Austin-based Ignite Learning, founded in 1999,
has benefited substantially from the woes of others. Many of the
transplanted Katrina victims will use the software program COW, cost of
$10,000 per school, as a result of Barbara Bush’s undisclosed, generous, but
earmarked, contribution to the Bush-Clinton Katrina Fund. Barbara and son,
Neil, presented the program at a special reception to “showcase everyone's
efforts in helping the hurricane evacuee students who ended up in Houston.”
Is this an example of the phrase – charity begins at home? “Neil Bush
reportedly toured former Soviet Union countries promoting Ignite with
Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky.” [4]
With money from Brown Brothers Harriman, George H. W. Bush, with

partners Hugh and Bill Liedtk formed Zapata Petroleum Corporation, an oil
exploration company. Bush bought out his partners in 1954 and by 1958 was
drilling on the Cay Sal Bank in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, later used as a
base for CIA raids on Cuba. These islands had been leased to Howard
Hughes, a huge Nixon supporter, the previous year. “The CIA was using
companies like Zapata to stage and supply secret missions attacking Fidel
Castro’s Cuban government in advance of the Bay of Pigs invasion. The
CIA’s codename for that invasion was ‘Operation Zapata.’” [5] “In 1969,
Zapata bought the United Fruit Company of Boston, another company with
strong CIA connections.” [6] All Bush and Zapata associated records
covering the years 1960 and 1966 were destroyed when Bush became vice
president in 1981. Bush was CIA director from 1976-1977.
The CIA supported “Papa Doc” and “Baby Doc” Duvalier, Saddam Hussein,
Mobutu Sese Seko, The Shah of Iran, General Noriega, General Pinochet,
General Prosper Avril, Ferdinand Marcos, and others. See a defined list of
covert activities. When our government, through the monopoly media,
demonizes some foreign leader – he has either rejected a big business
proposal or is duly elected and serves the best interests of his country rather
than the best interests of the U.S.
The CIA created al Qaeda, the database and instigated Islamic

fundamentalism by training 100,000 fundamentalist Muslim mujahadeen.
“Zbigniew Brzezinski not long ago revealed that on July 3, 1979, unknown
to the American public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly
authorized $500 million to create an international terrorist movement that
would spread Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia and ‘destabilize’ the
Soviet Union... The CIA called this Operation Cyclone and in the following
years poured $4 billion into setting up Islamic training schools in Pakistan
(Taliban means student). Young zealots were sent to the CIA's spy training
camp in Virginia, where future members of al Qaeda were taught ‘sabotage
skills’ - terrorism.” [7] It was Camp Peary, where young Afghans, Arabs
from Egypt and Jordan, and even some African-American black Muslims
were taught “sabotage skills”. [8]
“Between 1978 and 1992, the US government poured at least $6 billion

(some estimates range as high as $20 billion) worth of arms, training and
funds to prop up the mujahadeen factions. Other Western governments, as
well as oil-rich Saudi Arabia, kicked in as much again. Wealthy Arab
fanatics, like Osama bin Laden, provided millions more.”
The Constitution is gone. Despite the orchestrated media distraction, it is a

moot point whether someone swears to uphold the Constitution on a Koran,
once owned by Thomas Jefferson, or a Bible. Swearing on a bible or
anything else hardly demonstrates sincerity but rather provides proof that a
majority of our “elected” officials have perjured themselves. One’s word is
his/her bond and should suffice – which means no swearing at all. Ron Paul,
a Washington anomaly, is possibly the only exception. There have been
other elected, ethical officials who recognized and spoke out about the
globalist agenda like Congressman Larry P. McDonald who said: “The drive
of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government
combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under
their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is
such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and
incredibly evil in intent.” McDonald, who had announced presidential
intentions for 1988, allegedly died on September 1, 1983 aboard flight 007,
Korean Airlines (KAL) which purportedly was shot down by the Soviets.
[9] George P. Schultz, then-U.S. Secretary of State, terminated the speedy
investigation of the incident in December 1983 by saying that the plane had
flown off its scheduled course and had strayed into Soviet airspace. [10]
The presidency and balance of power are gone, usurped by imperialistic

puppet kings. The old conservatism that favored less government has been
replaced by neo-conservatism. Congress no longer writes laws in the best
interests of the citizens – they are busy with campaigning, pork-barrel
popularity and entertaining fat cat corporate lobbyists. Many laws originate
with presidential executive orders. Wars are undeclared! Citizens don’t
declare wars. They just die in them. Wars, with Americans as cannon fodder,
are designed to break the U.S. economy and impoverish Americans while
enriching the elite. Iran is obviously next on the war agenda.
“The twentieth century was the bloodiest in all history. More than 170
million people were killed by governments with ten million being killed in
World War I and fifty million being killed in World War II. In regard to the
fifty million killed in World War II, it is significant that nearly 70 percent
were innocent civilians, mainly as a result of the bombing of cities by Great
Britain and America.” [11] Then there was Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War
and the many unpublicized CIA wars. Meanwhile, some Americans, rather
than focusing on America’s brutality, naïvely concentrate on made-in-the-
U.S. terrorists – the perfect manufactured enemies!
Population reduction, a globalist goal, allows monopoly ownership of the
earth’s resources – less population means more for them! War, famine,
suppressed cures for catastrophic diseases, abortion acceptance, and health-
destroying, cancer-producing Monsanto monopolized genetically modified
foods all reduce world population and produce big profits.
The current orchestrated war on terror, arbitrarily designated after 9/11, has
now been expanded to encompass “radicals and extremists,” which may
include anyone who dissents, hates asparagus, dislikes certain colors, or
attracts any arbitrary official attention. In a tyranny, dissenters may be
branded and suppressed. We really have a government carrying out a war
against its own citizens. Tantalizing propaganda continues to propel
patriotically-energized, well-intentioned individuals, citizens or not, to
sacrifice life, limbs and health to “fight for our freedoms,” a euphemism for
mass murder to enrich Halliburton, Carlyle, Monsanto, Bechtel and other
corporations who win no-bid contracts from their administration pals. Top
management executives, closely allied with compliant, powerful government
officials, focus on their exorbitant, extravagant, unwarranted corporate
compensation packages while veterans struggle for assistance with their war-
related depleted uranium illnesses or personality disorders.
“There is no nation on earth powerful enough to accomplish our overthrow.

... Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From
the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their
carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some
danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public
servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they
may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of
their own undoing.” -- Daniel Webster, June 1, 1837
All governments, who harbor corruption and usurpation through secret

societies, will fail. Throughout history, the power elite, with their alternative
agendas, treasonous alliances, have orchestrated government coups,
assassinations, national destabilizations and counterfeit “elections” in order
to implement the satanical One World Order, also known as Babylon, the
great. Naïve Americans have been deceptively duped, through our own
“carelessness and negligence,” aided and abetted by the corporate-owned,
history-modifying, government-friendly media after the elimination of the
Fairness Doctrine during the Reagan administration.
Germar Rudolf said: “Whoever controls the histories of nations controls

those nations and their peoples.” Americans often fail to appreciate history’s
invaluable lessons. Current events, like 9/11, do not transpire in a vacuum
but in well-established patterns. History is prologue. Broadcast “news” is
sponsored by companies who are a part of the military/industrial/media
complex, allied with a constitution-ignoring government which is
compromised financially, morally and ethically.
Wall Street kingmakers decide who gets to be king, in the United States and
elsewhere. Then they control the king. The bankers hire and fire:
“Indicative of this was a strange event which occurred in October of 1964.

David Rockefeller, president of the Chase Manhattan Bank and Chairman of
the Board of the Council on Foreign Relations, took a vacation in the Soviet
Union. This is a peculiar place for the world's greatest 'imperialist' to take
his vacation, since much of the Communist propaganda deals with taking all
of David's wealth away from him and distributing it to 'the people.'”
“A few days after Rockefeller ended his 'vacation' in the Kremlin, Nikita
Khrushchev was recalled from a vacation at a Black Sea resort to learn that
he had been fired. How strange! As far as the world knew, Khrushchev was
the absolute dictator of the Soviet government and, more important, head of
the Communist Party which runs the USSR.”
“Who has the power to fire the man who was supposedly the absolute
dictator? Did David Rockefeller journey to the Soviet Union to fire an
employee? Obviously the position of Premier in the Soviet Union is a
figurehead with the true power residing elsewhere – perhaps in New York.”
[12]
Decades ago our government “by the people” was surreptitiously replaced,
through the “election” charade, a two party system of orchestrated opposites
designed to divide. The republic, based on principled law, was transformed
into a decadent cesspool of corruption – socialized democracy, conforming
to the Communist Manifesto and controlled by the satanical, seductive
power of secret societies. Bureaucratic covert agencies, established by the
powerbrokers, supposedly serve the interests of “national security” or
“national interests” – ruthless, pitiless pretenses for unmitigated greed
demonstrated by the corporate elite minions who seize resources without
responsibility or recognition of the rights of other people or countries.
Looters, posing as public servants, have also plundered trillions from
America’s coffers.
Any legitimate candidates, unapproved for election by the elite

establishment, are vilified or exposed for various created infractions.
Competency is insignificant – the handlers call all the shots. If per chance,
by some fluke, a non compliant person gets elected, as in 1960, then that
person may easily be eliminated by a lone gunman Manchurian candidate
patsy who is immediately and conveniently made permanently unavailable.
As noted previously, airplane mishaps are also effective – notwithstanding
the collateral damage of fellow passengers, inconsequential to insiders!
Other influential unelected leaders who successfully lift and inspire others
above the Order’s socially engineered class status are also eliminated and
replaced with obedient minions who consequently reap wealth, enjoy regular
media attention, and habitually play the race card while keeping their
brothers in subjection and poverty. Martin Luther King Jr., the non violent
civil rights activist, was castigated by the media as a Communist, a former
tactic to censure anyone who opposed the elite agenda.
“Despite extensive surveillance, the FBI was never able to find any direct
funding or other links between King and the Communist party.” [13] “The
FBI began wiretapping King in 1961, fearing that communists were trying to
infiltrate the civil rights movement, but when no such evidence emerged, the
bureau used the incidental details caught on tape over six years in attempts
to force King out of the pre-eminent leadership position.” [14] He openly
expressed opposition to the Vietnam War and opposed U.S. involvement in
South Africa and Latin America. He was allegedly killed by James Earl Ray,
a petty criminal the day after his famous Mountaintop Speech in Memphis,
Tennessee.
Changes made under every administration strip our freedoms. The 16th and
17th Amendments were passed during the Taft administration. The Income
Tax and Federal Reserve Act, the 16th Amendment, was quietly pushed
through congress immediately before Christmas by Senator Nelson
Aldridge, maternal grandfather of Trilateral Commission founder David
Rockefeller. Most of the lawmakers were unavailable for the vote. The 17th
Amendment altered the manner in which senators are elected making it
possible to financially manipulate elections.
“This is a startling revelation: $300 trillion of wealth is secretly controlled

by an unspecified cabal of the world's richest families. The power of the
Rothschild family was evidenced on 24th September 2002 when a helicopter
touched down on the lawn of Waddedson Manor, their ancestral home in
Buckinghamshire, England. Out of the helicopter strode Warren Buffet, -
touted as the second richest man in the world - and Arnold Schwarzenegger,
candidate for the Governorship of California. They'd come to rub shoulders
with James Wolfensohn, President of the World Bank and Nicky
Oppenheimer, Chairman of De Beers at a two day conference hosted by
Jacob Rothschild. Arnold went on to secure the governorship of one of the
biggest economies on the planet a year later.” [15]
On Aug 9, 2004, Congressman Ron Paul said: “Liberty is lost through

complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome
automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards,
and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our
American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of
government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for
long.” [16]
Go to Part 21
[1] The Origins of the Overclass By Steve Kangas
[2] Robert A. Lovett
[3] Neil Mallon Bush
[4]Former first lady's donation aids son, Katrina funds earmarked to pay for Neil Bush's
software program By Cynthia Leonor Garza
[5] Famous Texans, George H.W. Bush
[6] Ibid
[7] The CIA's "Operation Cyclone" - Stirring the Hornet's Nest of Islamic Unrest
[8] How the CIA created Osama bin Laden
[9] The Assassination of Congressman Larry McDonald (KAL flight 007)
[10] Who killed congressman Lawrence Patton McDonald?, part 1, by Todd Brendan
Fahey, July 01, 2001
[12] None Dare call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, p. 121
[13] The Truth About Martin Luther King, Jr.
[14] Martin Luther King Jr.
[15] Arnold & Buffett's 2002 Rothschild Rendezvous, Reuters 24 Sept. 2002
[16] Police State USA


also be included.
The New World Order, Criminals and Their Camps

Part 21
By Deanna Spingola
22 January 2007
Opposite sides of contemporary wars, particularly from the U.S. Civil War,
are typically orchestrated and financed by the international banking cartel
for population depletion, resources management, money manipulation and
destruction of national economies, redistribution of inhabitants and
realignment of borders. Complicit, compromised insiders simulate enemy
assaults, demonize “their” chosen military targets in order to provoke anger,
recruit cannon fodder and fuel mass insecurity while denouncing all
opposition. Dictatorial governments manage perceptions through expensive
public relations firms, disseminate disinformation through the monopoly
media and propagate flag-waving, self-righteous nationalism to justify
offensive invasions. War is the enforcement mechanism of the satanical New
World Order.
In January 1943, Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill met in Casablanca to
discuss the unconditional surrender of Germany. At the end of 1943, at the
Russian Embassy in Tehran, Stalin and Roosevelt drank a toast to the deaths
of 50,000 German officers to be shot at the conclusion of the war.
Unconditional surrender is an ominous term – it signaled the complete
abolition of the German government and loss of all treaty rights, including
protection of prisoners under the Geneva Conventions. [1]
In September 1939, prior allies, Stalin and Hitler joined forces in the
invasion, dismantling and decimation of Poland. However, Stalin, a
genocidal murderer, escaped culpability at Nuremberg for the Katyn Forest
slaughter. [2] This 1940 Soviet massacre of Polish prisoners was confirmed
by James Bacque during his investigation in the KGB archives after they
were opened in 1990.[3] It was also confirmed by Mikhail Gorbachev who,
in 1989, produced the actual documents proving that the Soviet Secret
Police, by orders from Stalin, murdered 21,587 Polish enemies of the Soviet
state and buried them in the Katyn Forest. However, the contrived
allegations against the Nazis were useful in fueling America’s hatred against
all Germans, rather than the government thugs. [4]
Conquerors, those who have killed the most people, and frequently the
conflict instigators often sponsor criminal tribunals for the vanquished –
those who run out of money, men, and ammunition or no longer
accommodate those who actually control. Many installed tyrants, feeling
absolutely justified, actually demand exemption from their premeditated war
crimes.
Notwithstanding the proposed “unconditional surrender” terms, Eisenhower

gave a speech in Paris in March 1945 asserting that the United States would
honor the Geneva Conventions with regard to humane treatment of
prisoners, many captured as early as May 1943. Within days of the Paris
speech, Eisenhower, without honor, surreptitiously signed an order
establishing a deathly DEF (Disarmed Enemy Forces) status for all
prisoners, even those who voluntarily surrendered. This action was against
the civilized provisions of the Geneva Conventions which the United States
signed, along with forty-six other countries, on July 27, 1929. [5] Germany
ultimately admitted defeat on May 8, 1945. By June there were between
4,000,000 to 5,000,000 prisoners under Eisenhower’s jurisdiction – all with
DEF status.
The Normandy Invasion took place on June 6, 1944. That fall, Churchill,
Stalin and Roosevelt agreed to implement the Morgenthau Plan, actually
created by Harry Dexter White, which would completely destroy German
industry (against Geneva Conventions). Germany’s industry supported their
importation of food which they did not produce themselves. Deliberate
industrial destruction (by war or massive illegal immigration) results in job
loss, homelessness, starvation and death. The official assumptions were that
about 40% of the population would die – about 20 million German civilians.
Moreover, at the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the victorious three,
Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill, discussed the realignment and
dismemberment of Germany.
Henry C. Morgenthau was Secretary of the Treasury. His cohort, globalist

Harry Dexter White, part of the department since 1935, was then chief
international economist at the U.S. Treasury and “liaison between the
Treasury and the State Department on all matters bearing on foreign
relations.” [6] White, a treasonous insider agent, influenced the design and
development of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
[7] He acted in that capacity at the United Nations Monetary and Financial
Conference held at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire where the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), was also established. GATT is a
United Nations agency created by a multinational treaty to promote trade by
the reduction of tariffs and import quotas.
At the close of World War II, Americans were outraged and horrified by
film footage of emaciated, dead bodies being mechanically discarded into
mass graves and views of newly liberated individuals, little more than
skeletons, filmed in their bleak, barren wooden bunks – abundant evidence
of the atrocious criminal behavior by the incompetent, charismatic Hitler and
the other amoral thugs who, with Wall Street money,[8] [9] had seized
control of the government, orchestrated the Reichstag fire, targeted
convenient enemies, quickly suspended personal liberties and instituted
national ID under the guise of increased security. I wonder if there was a
Reichstag Fire Truth Movement.
One has to wonder why the German populace weren’t outraged enough to
speak out against such tyrannical activities. Is it possible that their
government worked behind claims of “national security” and “national
interests?” The average brainwashed citizen knew nothing about the foreign
and domestic activities of their secretive government. All information,
propaganda, was controlled by the government. One also has to wonder why
ordinary German citizens, guards and military, would obey questionable
orders.
Despite pandemic atrocities throughout Europe during that war, the major
media focus has always been directed at the Nazi crimes against the Jews,
perpetrated in such infamous places as Birkenau, Bergen-Belsen,
Buchenwald, and Dachau – names that should remind us of man’s
inhumanity to man. However, the Jewish people were not the only victims of
the catastrophic satanically-staged New World Order event known as World
War II.
The first Nazi camp, Dachau, was established in March 1933 for political
prisoners – opponents of the Nazi regime, resistance groups, vocal dissidents
and groups deemed racially inferior, such as Jews and Roma (Gypsies). [10]
“It was located on the grounds of an abandoned munitions factory near the
northeastern part of the town of Dachau, about 10 miles northwest of
Munich in southern Germany. During the first year, the camp held about
4,800 prisoners.” From 1933 to 1945 Dachau inmates numbered 188,000.
[11]
On May 20, 1940, the Nazis founded, in the Polish town of Oświęcim, the
notorious camp, Auschwitz, infamous for sadistic medical experimentations,
at the site of an old Polish brick army barracks adjacent to a railroad track,
very convenient for merciless mass human transport.
Numerous camps were in Germany, Poland, Norway, Italy, Lithuania,

Croatia, Austria, France and elsewhere. They were used for collection,
detention, resettlement and extermination. Exact numbers are unknown, but
millions, Christians, Jews, Communists were exterminated. The government,
for economic exploitation, established camps in the vicinity of factories or
industry – essentially labor camps. Perhaps the inmates did the work that
Germans wouldn’t do? They built roads, worked in gravel pits, and later in
the armaments production for the Nazi war machine. [12]
One of the definitions of fascism is corporate control coupled with a strong,

centralized government. Many of the Nazi camps were designed as labor
camps for government-friendly German corporations. Cheap labor produces
more affordable “toys” for an approving, but thoughtless, populace.
Corporations in cahoots with governments often lure cheap labor from
poorer countries. Unpaid inmates provide even greater profits.
“Thousands of ‘security suspects’ released from German prisons in the

autumn of 1942 were sent to concentration camps and literally worked to
death under a program called ‘Annihilation through Work’ (Vernichtung
durch Arbeit). Finally, captured members of national resistance movements
were sent to concentration camps to be murdered upon arrival.” [13]
Moreover, there were about two hundred additional barbed-wire enclosed

camps in Germany that incarcerated between four and five million
individuals by June 1945. However, these camps lacked even the barest
facilities found in other camps: barracks, laboratories, camp kitchens,
infirmaries and latrines. In the absence of latrines, crowded inmates,
standing almost shoulder to shoulder, by necessity, often relieved themselves
where they stood – a growing quagmire of contaminating putrid mud.
Latrines (ditches), where available, were death traps for those who slipped.
Food, water and shelter, basic human necessities, were unavailable in these
camps although there were sufficient resources available. These were not the
German camps, but American camps, supervised by Eisenhower, where
thousands of ordinary soldiers, ignorant of their government’s atrocities,
ultimately starved and died.
Eisenhower, among numerous other “high” officials, past and current,

proves that mediocre individuals frequently ascend any available ladder
through complicit connections and stealthy agreements rather than native
competence. Even costly ghost-written books, before or after their
endeavors, suggest questionable qualifications or fictional legacies.
Americans were not outraged by the atrocities committed in these camps

because they were completely ignored by the U.S. media, then and now.
Subsidized and sanitized history books produced by The West German
Foreign Office under the direction of Willy Brandt provide a long-term
cover-up of the atrocities. [14] After the war and unknown to many outside
of Germany, more than fifteen million Germans were driven from their
homes in central and Eastern Europe. These were trusting civilians who
accommodated their tyrannical government. This huge migration was
according to the international agreement signed at Potsdam in 1945.
The Geneva Conventions are very clear on treatment of military prisoners.

The agreement signed by most major countries on July 27, 1929 purportedly
established humane treatment of enemies during World War II. Apparently,
the Geneva Conventions meant little to the military leaders in charge. The
American Propaganda Ministry consistently generated hatred of the German
inmates who they claimed deserved incarceration, lack of basic human
necessities and even torture, if necessary. Inhumane treatment at the hands
of Germans or Americans is deplorable.
According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, it is a soldier's duty to

disobey illegal orders. Military personnel may disobey illegal orders from a
superior officer, even if that officer is the president. “In each case, military
personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and
indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by
the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal
obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue
unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the
Constitution and the UCMJ.” [15]
Concentration camps did not originate with the Nazis. History books often
fail to mention the British use of concentration camps, first used to confine
and control large numbers of civilians in South Africa during the second
Boer War 1899-1902. The Americans had Andersonville, Georgia and
others during the Civil War.
Most Americans say little about Guantánamo Bay. Politicians who mention
the camp, where hundreds are held without charges, are demonized as un-
American or soft on terrorists. When the Japanese, even American born,
were incarcerated, Americans maintained silence. After all, a Japanese life
apparently had less value than an American life, given that America bombed
two non military cities allegedly to “save American lives.”
Civilian Japanese internment began March 2, 1942 with Executive Order

No. 9066 which was signed by Roosevelt on February 19, 1942. “Relocation
centers” were located in California, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming,
Colorado, and Arkansas.
“Roosevelt's executive order was fueled by anti-Japanese sentiment among

farmers who competed against Japanese labor, politicians who sided with
anti-Japanese constituencies, and the general public, whose frenzy was
heightened by the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor. More than 2/3rds of the
Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United
States.” [16] It takes mass support against a specific group of people to make
Concentration camps acceptable. Once they are tolerable for one group – say
illegal aliens, they can be appropriated for others – anti-war dissidents,
alleged terrorists, enemy combatants or anyone opposing government
actions. Of course, this is intended to make the homeland safe. In 1922 when
he was establishing the Gestapo, Hitler said the following: “An evil exists
that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation. We must
take steps to insure our domestic security and protect our homeland.” Sound
familiar?
In March 1942, the U.S. government began seizing the property and assets
of Japanese-descended citizens, and the War Relocation Authority was
formed to “assist” the Japanese-Americans who were being driven out of
several states. By summer, well over 100,000 Japanese-Americans had been
“evacuated” from the West Coast to other states and military prison camps.
[17] Small similarities to the New Orleans evacuation are merely
coincidental. Mass population movements function as social engineering.
The American government has written plans (PDF file) dated January 14,
2005 defining their Civilian Inmate Labor Program. Camps have already
been established by nefarious presidential executive orders and through
FEMA all over the country. See a complete list here or here. This is not
recent but started in the Reagan administration. The Federal Emergency
Management Agency plan called REX- 84 was drafted by Oliver North by
order of Ronald Reagan.
We didn’t speak out when they arrested and incarcerated the Japanese for
their own good. We didn’t speak out when they incarcerated some terrorists
in Guantánamo. We were silent when we discovered information about
rendition flights. Abu Ghraib was insignificant – it was thousands of miles
away and purportedly it was a few isolated incidents. We are incredulous
when we hear about FEMA camps in America – not in America, the land of
the free. Who will speak out, if not Americans, when citizens are
incarcerated for being old, non-productive, non-compliant, homosexual, the
wrong religion or race, anti-war, and against high-level treason or critical of
the growing state tyranny?
Details of the detainee operations are here as a PDF file. There is also a U.S.
Army FM 3-19.40 Military Police (MP) Internment-Resettlement
Operations: Military Prisons, Prisoners Of War (POW), Civilian Internees:
Field Manual Guide Book available on CD-ROM at Amazon.
See also:
Martial Law Concerns, House of Representatives - March 11, 2003
American Prison Camps Are on the Way: The Military Commissions Act of
2006:
Rex 84: FEMA's Blueprint for Martial Law in America
Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps
10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals From
Oliver North by Peter Dale Scott
Bibliography:
The Morgenthau Plan and the Problem of Policy Perversion, Paper presented to the Ninth
International Revisionist Conference by Prof. Anthony Kubek (A Must Read!)
Other Losses, An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the
[1]
Hands of the French and Americans After World War II, p. 6
[2] Soviet Crimes Against Poland During World War II
[3]Was Ike Responsible for the Deaths of Hundreds of Thousands of German POW's?
Pro and Con

[5] The Geneva Conventions, The Avalon Project
[6] Harry Dexter White
[7] Harry Dexter White and the International Monetary Fund
“Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951” - Federal Documents By John

[8]
Buchanan and Stacey Michael
[9] Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler By Antony C. Sutton
[10] Concentration Camps, 1939-1942
[11] Dachau
[12] List of concentration camps of Nazi Germany
[13] Concentration Camps, 1939-1942
Other Losses, An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the
[14]
Hands of the French and Americans After World War II, p. 154
[15] A Duty to Disobey All Unlawful Orders
[16] Japanese Relocation Centers
[17] Japanese American internment


also be included.
The New World Order, the Transatlantic Economic

Integration
Part 22
By Deanna Spingola
12 May 2007
Long before George W. Bush met with Paul Martin, then Canada’s Prime
Minister and Vicente Fox, then Mexico’s president at Baylor University in
the miserably memorialized city of Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005, he had
a similar meeting in Göteborg, Sweden on June 14, 2001 with Romano
Prodi, then European Commission President and Swedish Prime Minister
Göran Persson, then President of the European Council. There were several
reasons for this media-blacked-out meeting but the essential purpose was the
discussion and implementation of the Transatlantic Agenda, supported by
both E.U. and U.S. authorities. [1]
The Transatlantic Agenda was adopted on December 3, 1995 at the EU-US

Summit in Madrid and signed by William Clinton, then U.S. president and
Felipe Gonzalez, then Spanish Prime Minister and Jacques Santer, then
European Commission President (1995 – 15 March 1999). The European
Commission is the executive body of the European Union. [2] On 1 May
2004 the European Union (EU) undertook an historic enlargement, bringing
the total number of Member States from fifteen to twenty five.
Then again from 25 to 26 June 2004, George W. Bush met with Romano
Prodi and Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, then President of the European Council
in the Dromoland Castle, County Clare, Ireland. [3] They discussed Iraq, the
Middle East and counter-terrorism. The summit ended with an agreement
between the satellite navigation systems, GPS from the US and the EU’s
Galileo system, which secures full interoperability of the two satellite
navigation systems. This agreement, initiated in December 1995, was signed
by U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, Commission Vice President
Loyola de Palacio and Irish Foreign Minister, Brian Cowen. The system will
be operational by 2008, possibly to coincide with Real ID? [4]
The crux of this media-blacked-out summit: “The EU and the US are

committed to a result-driven economic partnership focused on well-
identified and mutually beneficial bilateral projects in all areas where better
cooperation between governments and regulators can achieve common
solutions to concrete problems affecting transatlantic business.” [5] They
expanded on the Transatlantic Economic Partnership Action Plan of 1998
and the Positive Economic Agenda roadmap of 2002. Right, we never heard
of those meetings or schemes either!
Another issue was non compliance with the WTO, “a legal system set up to
regulate and bring order to world trade. As such, upon accession to the
organization, WTO members agree to stand by and uphold any decisions
that the WTO takes. Full compliance with WTO rulings is therefore one of
the fundamental cornerstones on which the continued functioning of the
international trade system rests.” [6]
Then there was the summit in June 2005 where they “launched the ‘Initiative
to Enhance Transatlantic Economic Integration and Growth.’” And how
about the meeting on November 30, 2005 in Brussels, Belgium which was a
follow-up to the commitments made at the U.S.-EU summit in June 2005?
The U.S. delegation was led by Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez. “The
delegations agreed to concrete action plans and timelines to tackle the most
significant issues in the trans-Atlantic economy, according to a press release
from the Council of the European Union.” [7] There was another meeting on
November 9, 2006 where they talked about the Transatlantic Capital Market
Integration. [8]
What next – the Amero? That is the least of our worries. While the astute are
focused on the NAU there are other issues. Foreign Affairs, published by the
CFR had the following to say: “the world economy and the international
financial system have evolved in such a way that there is no longer a viable
model for economic development outside of them.” [9]
“The right course is not to return to a mythical past of monetary sovereignty,

with governments controlling local interest and exchange rates in blissful
ignorance of the rest of the world. Governments must let go of the fatal
notion that nationhood requires them to make and control the money used in
their territory. National currencies and global markets simply do not mix;
together they make a deadly brew of currency crises and geopolitical tension
and create ready pretexts for damaging protectionism. In order to globalize
safely, countries should abandon monetary nationalism and abolish
unwanted currencies, the source of much of today's instability.” [10] Given
the CFR’s influence in foreign, national and personal policies, this is
significant.
Then on April 30, 2007 there was yet another meeting, mentioned in the
alternative media but blacked-out in the mass media. This meeting was
entitled: Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration
Between the United States of America and the European Union with the
opening paragraph: “Believing that deeper transatlantic economic integration
and growth will benefit our citizens and the competitiveness of our
economies, will have global benefits, will facilitate market access for third
countries and will encourage other countries to adopt the transatlantic
economic model of respect for property rights, openness to investment,
transparency and predictability in regulation, and the value of free markets;
… [11] There is an Open Skies agreement that will take effect on March 30,
2008 and will allow EU carriers to fly to anywhere in the US and vice
versa.” The conspirators reaffirmed America’s commitment to the 2005
U.S.-EU Summit Declaration on Enhancing Transatlantic Economic
Integration and Growth in which they “resolved to pursue a forward-looking
agenda to enhance transatlantic economic integration and growth, and our
commitments from the June 2006 Summit to redouble our efforts to reduce
barriers to transatlantic trade and investment and our pledge to keep our
investment regimes open and to build on existing investment flows to boost
growth and create jobs in the transatlantic economy.” [12]
Further it was stated: “We have identified … projects, selected from the
existing work program and other programs within the existing transatlantic
dialogue, that will significantly enhance transatlantic economic integration,
and we resolve to achieve progress on these projects within six to eight
months of the effective date of this Framework, and at latest by the time of
the 2008 EU-U.S. Summit.” [13]
There are co-chairs on both sides: “The Transatlantic Economic Council is

hereby established, to be co-chaired, on the U.S. side, by a U.S. Cabinet-
level official in the Executive Office of the President (embedded January
2005), Allan Hubbard and on the EU side by a Member of the European
Commission, Vice President Guenter Verheugen, collaborating closely with
the EU Presidency.” [14] Where is our comatose Congress on this “treaty,”
this plan to integrate the EU and the United States? Some Americans have
been heavily distracted by the North American Union and the open-on-
purpose southern border.
So what kind of individual is Allan Hubbard, a huge contributor to the

Republican Party? He attended the Bilderberg meetings in 2004 and 2005.
The Logan Act specifically states that it is against the law for federal
officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public
policies. However, the American government was represented in 2005 at
Rottach-Egern by Allan Hubbard, assistant to the president for economic
policy and director of the National Economic Council. Others attended as
well: “William Luti, deputy under secretary of defense; James Wolfensohn,
outgoing president of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary
of state, an ideologue of the Iraq war and incoming president of the World
Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting, these people all broke federal
laws of the United States.” [15] So, what else is new? Laws are for the rest
of us.
During the George H.W. Bush Administration, big business personalities
were placed in key regulatory positions. An effort to weaken certain
regulations was led by Vice President Quayle who employed a group called
the White House Council on Competitiveness to spearhead the campaign.
“In 1991 the Council’s executive director, Allan Hubbard, was accused of a
conflict of interest because of his financial holdings in corporations that
stood to benefit from a deregulatory agenda. One of those companies was an
Indiana chemical producer of which Hubbard was a half-owner.” [16] This
company has done business with third world dictators. [17]
“By quashing an EPA recycling regulation that affected his family's

newspaper business, Quayle violated the most minimal ethical standards.
One expert bluntly described the vice president's actions as ‘the common
alley-cat breed of conflict of interest.”’ Quayle gave Hubbard a waiver from
our conflict-of-interest laws. This waiver allowed Hubbard to participate in
clean-air regulatory decisions that directly affected his financial interests.
[18] Hubbard owned stock in an electric utility company, another industry
subject to new Clean Air Act requirements. In response to these conflict of
interest charges the White House displayed a waiver from conflict of interest
laws that Quayle granted Hubbard in June 1991. [19]
Hubbard attended Harvard Business School with George W. Bush and

appears to travel in like-minded company. Hubbard raised more than
$300,000 for Bush's presidential campaigns and was intimately involved in
Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, holding policy tutorials for the
candidate and recruiting other policy advisers for the campaign. “An original
Bush ‘Pioneer,’ Hubbard raised more than $100,000 for the president's 2000
campaign, then made the list of 221 Bush supporters last year who raised
more than $200,000 each. He also contributed more than $94,000 to
Republican candidates and campaign committees since the 2000 election
cycle, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. His wife,
Kathryn Hubbard, gave nearly $20,000 more.” [20] Allan B. Hubbard has
always been a big Republican contributor for which he was undoubtedly
amply rewarded.
War, financed on both sides by international bankers, desolates lives,
destroys economies, depletes resources, moves massive amounts of money
and promotes despair, discouragement and dependence within the population
and creates more wealth and power for the corporate elite. To the elite,
common humanity functions merely as cannon fodder and labor, the
cheaper, the better! The purpose of war is profit. War-torn people easily fall
prey to the suggestions of the elitists who have ulterior and highly profitable
motives in offering security and solace.
People willingly give up their freedoms when threatened. World War II gave
rise to the two new super powers: the United States and the Soviet Union, a
new enemy, heavily financed by Wall Street and industrialized with our tax
money and technology – in Hegelian Dialectical terms – thesis and
antithesis. Owning both sides ensures success – like owning both political
parties.
Economic warfare directed by the British in an effort to reclaim her

American colony began with deflation through the New York Panic of 1920-
21. Next was the Crash of 1929. The British banking cabal was instrumental
in shaping the Federal Reserve whose policies led to the wild speculation
and ultimate crash, during the Great Depression of 1929. [21] The deliberate
catastrophic crash was world-wide creating joblessness, hunger,
disintegration of production and national bankruptcies.
The U.S. government alleged that the Second World War was caused by
serious obstacles to free trade, exacerbated by the financial events of 1929
manifested in Nazi fascism and responsible for the tensions that led to the
Second World War. As a consequence of their questionable theory, the
conditions of receiving American economic aid included the implementation
of a free trade policy.
Winston Churchill, an agent of the British banking cabal, gave a promotional
speech at Zurich University on September 19, 1946 which was the first step
towards European integration. Europe found integration acceptable for three
reasons: awareness of their own vulnerability, to prevent further wars, “to
create a freer, fairer and more prosperous continent.” [22]
America gallantly began to fight the “war on communism,” a precursor to

the “war on terrorism.” In March 1947, Harry Truman appealed to Congress
for funds (tax money) to support anti-communist forces in Greece. He then
proclaimed a broad new policy – The Truman Doctrine, to keep communism
in check throughout the world. [23] The premeditated provocateur provided
U.S. citizens with visions of Armageddon-style annihilation giving our
corporate-directed government ample justification for numerous bloody
wars, carnage-creating conflicts, clandestine operations and starving
economic sanctions against nonconformist countries who wish to retain their
natural resources.
On April 16, 1948, sixteen European countries responded to the generous

offer of U.S. economic aid through the Marshall Plan, purportedly to impede
the expansion of communism. [24] The Organization for European
Economic Cooperation (became the Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development – OECD in 1960) was established in order to
restore Europe’s economy under the Marshall Plan, the economic carrot, but
not without conditions. Each recipient had to sign a strict agreement
promising to balance its budget, free prices, halt inflation, stabilize its
exchange rate and abolish trade restrictions and allocate scarce
commodities. The recipients had to devise a scheme to allocate aid in
collaboration with each other. From the beginning America encouraged
West European political and economic integration. [25]
America’s economy grew during the war; especially the military/industrial

complex – the shipbuilders, aircraft and weapons manufacturers – and they
wanted new customers. Conversely, European and Japanese industry and
infrastructure were ravished. The Marshall Plan money, by agreement, had
to be used to purchase American exports. They would begin their marketing
in Europe – what a radical concept for American business. [26] Bomb them
and then allow campaign-contributing-businesses to reap the rewards of
marketing and rebuilding.
The Treaty of Paris created the benign amalgamation of the countries of

Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and West Germany.
The treaty was signed on April 18, 1951 and expired on April 18, 2001.
These countries were then referred to as the European Coal and Steel
Community (ECSC) purportedly to pool their coal and steel resources, a
plan wholly supported by the elitists residing in the United States. [27]
The European Community (originally called European Economic

Community) was founded on March 25, 1957 by the signing of the Treaty of
Rome. With such common interests as economic, social and trade matters,
the manipulated countries easily morphed into the European Union which
was created on February 7, 1992 in Maastricht, Netherlands, known as the
Maastricht Treaty (formally, the Treaty of European Union, TEU), for the
place where it was signed. The treaty was entered into force on November 1,
1993. Down with independence and personal freedoms!
It appears we are on the fast track to the One World Order. With George H.
W. Bush giving or selling our infrastructure through an Executive Order and
his son, things looks pretty dismal. [28]
Thomas Jefferson said: “I believe that banking institutions are more

dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people
ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up
around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their
children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The
issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to
whom it properly belongs.” -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Re-
charter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
Next on the agenda: the full implementation of The North American Union
which began as a seemingly innocuous document called the Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North America, just a collaboration to ensure
prosperity for adjoining countries and safety from the terrorists, communists,
Islamofascists or whichever enemy is currently targeted on the daily Two
Minutes Hate segment distributed through the “fair and balanced”,
everything-sounds-like-Fox-News, mass media by the Propaganda Ministry.
[29]
Bibliography:
The Transatlantic Community: Helping Build Peace, Prosperity, and Security in the
Greater Middle East
EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth
The New Transatlantic Agenda
Go to Part 23
[1] First Summit between EU leaders and US President George W. Bush, June 12, 2001
[2] European Commission, Wikipedia
[3] EU – US Summit, Ireland, 25-26 June 2004
[4] Agreement between Galileo and the Global Positioning System (GPS), PDF file
[5] EU-US Bilateral Economic Relations, PDF file
[6] US Non-Compliance With WTO Rulings, PDF file
[7] United States, European Union Hold Informal Economic Ministerial
[8] Statement on U.S.-EU Economic Ministerial

[9] The End of National Currency by Benn Steil, Foreign Affairs, May/June 2007
[10] Ibid
[11]Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration Between the United

States of America and the European Union, April 30, 2007
[12]US and EU agree 'single market' The United States and the European Union have
signed up to a new transatlantic economic partnership at a summit in Washington
[13] Ibid
[14] Ibid
[15] Bilderberg Group, USA Criminals
[16] The Revolving Door and Industry Influence On Public Policy by Peter O’Driscoll, Center of Concern
& Scott Amey, Project On Government Oversight, P. 17, PDF File
[17] Bilderberg Group
[18] Quayle Group Meddles with our Standards, December 23, 1991
[19] Quayle
Bush Picks Supporter as Economic Council Chief By Jonathan Weisman,

[20]
Washington Post Staff Writer, Tuesday, January 11, 2005; Page E03
[21] Part
7, British Financial Warfare: 1929; 1931- 33, How the City of London Created
the Great Depression by Webster G. Tarpley, December, 1996,
[22]The Origins 1945-1951, The History of the European Union, The European
Citizenship,
[23]A gift from the cold war: Bretton Woods revisited, 1994 Economist Newspaper Ltd.,
available: Highbeam
[24] Britannica Online, Organization for European Economic Co-operation
[25]A gift from the cold war: Bretton Woods revisited, 1994 Economist Newspaper Ltd.,
available: Highbeam
[26] Ibid
[27] European Coal and Steel Community, Wikipedia

[28] Executive Order 12803 - Infrastructure Privatization, April 30th, 1992,
[29] Two Minutes Hate, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
also be included.
The New World Order, The Bilderberg Plan – Control Oil,

Control People
Part 23
By Deanna Spingola
30 July 2007
There are arguments from both sides of the oil issue: either we are quickly
running out of oil or we have adequate oil to meet our requirements for
generations. Both sides offer evidence, witnesses, experts and
documentation to validate their assertions. Some peak-oil projects, funded
by oil companies, are highly suspect. The very credible Lindsey Williams
maintains that the North Slope in Alaska has as much crude oil as Saudi
Arabia. Governor Frank H. Murkowski said in 2005 that there is enough oil
on the North Slope to supply the entire United States for 200 years. [1]
Antony Sutton, author of Energy, the Created Crisis, is adamant that we
have sufficient oil. Conversely, I have read reports which support the peak
oil theory. I personally believe, after research, that “there is enough and to
spare.” Doom and gloom, Chicken Little oil scarcity claims have been
propagated from the beginning. A scarcity, authentic or manufactured, of
any crucial commodity accomplishes the following:
1. Increases profits to those who manipulate that commodity.
2. Allows the controllers to determine availability to the “right” people.
3. In the case of energy – severely impacts lifestyle, progress and

prosperity.
4. Extracts more money from an often overburdened consumer.
Henry A. Kissinger, Rockefeller’s well-compensated, multi-purpose minion

and long-time member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) said:
“Control the oil and you can control entire Continents. Control food and you
control people.” [2] Michael Collon, Belgian author said: “If you want to
rule the world, you need to control oil. All the oil. Anywhere.” [3]
The first very memorable “oil crisis” occurred in 1973. Nixon, obedient to
his handlers, announced the demonetization of the dollar on August 15,
1971. This allowed time for the “real deciders” to plan their strategy. Eighty-
four individuals, financial, corporate and political elitists, gathered at
Saltsjöbaden, Sweden for the annual Bilderberg meeting. American attendee,
Walter J. Levy, outlined the plan for a pending 400% increase in OPEC
revenues, the exact percentage that Kissinger would demand of Saudi
Arabian Shah. Their intentions were not prevention but rather a scheme on
how to manage the projected abundance of oil dollars – what was later
referred to by Herr Kissinger as “recycling the petrodollar flows.” The
Bilderberg policy was to initiate a global oil embargo. [4]
An internal memo, dated January 8, 1973, from U.S. Bilderberg official

Robert D. Murphy suggested a list of participants for the May 1973 meeting.
He stated: “There will be room for only 20 Americans at Saltsjöbaden.” [5]
Those attending included Robert O. Anderson of Atlantic Richfield Oil Co.,
Lord Greenhill, chairman of British Petroleum, Sir Eric Roll of Siegmund G.
Warburg (creator of Eurobonds), George Ball of Lehman Brothers
Investment Bank, Henry Kissinger, William P. Bundy, Zbigniew Brzezinski
(soon to be Carter’s national security advisor), David Rockefeller, Emilio G.
Collado, Executive Vice President, Exxon Corp.; Gianni Agnelli, Otto Wolff
von Amerongen and Arthur H. Dean, CFR Director (1955-72) and a partner
in Rockefeller-oriented Sullivan & Cromwell. Kissinger had requested
Warburg to develop the Eurobonds ten years before. [6] A very small
scheming elite group, centered in New York and London, influence the
economy of the entire world.
The reasons for the “oil shock” were:
1. Launch a colossal assault against world industrial growth.
2. Tilt the balance of power back to the advantage of Anglo-American

financial interests.
3. Control the world’s oil flows, their most powerful weapon.
4. Increase the world demand for U.S. dollars. [7]
Egypt and Syria invaded Israel on October 6, 1973 which came to be known
as the Yom Kippur War. This war was “secretly orchestrated” by Herr
Henry Kissinger, Nixon’s national security adviser as well as Secretary of
State. Kissinger effectively managed the Israeli response through his close
association with Simcha Dinitz. Kissinger, “Nixon’s intelligence czar,”
through privileged channels, misrepresented motives, suppressed
communications, and intercepted intelligence reports ensured that the war
would progress and end with his “shuttle diplomacy” as planned in May
1973 at Saltsjöbaden. The Arabs, scapegoats for the Elite, were the
recipients of the world’s rage and Kissinger was the recipient of the Nobel
Peace Prize for 1973. [8]
A “fortuitous coincidence” was that, with oil’s huge price increase, British
Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell and other Anglo-American oil companies
were able to substantially recoup the millions they had spent in the
exploration of the North Sea oilfields. Meanwhile, in Vienna, OPEC
countries met and decided to raise their prices by 70% and initiated an oil
embargo on all oil sales to the U.S. and the Netherlands (major oil port for
Western Europe) because of the U.S. support for Israel in the Middle East
War. On October 17, 1973, OPEC demanded withdrawal of Israel from Arab
territories occupied since June 1967 and the restoration of the legal rights of
the Palestinians. Nixon was in the midst of Watergate, orchestrated by de
facto president Kissinger and assisted by Alexander Haig. [9] There are
detectable reasons for Kissinger, a Rockefeller asset, to “Watergate” Nixon,
a man he detested and swore he would never work for – he didn’t. [10] In
addition, the Watergate fiasco distracted the masses from the grave
economic situation.
Uninformed Nixon attempted to get U.S. Treasury officials to force OPEC to

lower oil prices but was bluntly instructed, via a memo, that the bankers had
mandated the dollar “recycling” program to accommodate the higher oil
prices. Jack F. Bennett, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International
Monetary Affairs (until July 1974), had counseled Nixon towards his 1971
dollar demonetization decision. Bennett, at Kissinger’s direction and
according to an established agreement with the Saudis to finance the U.S.
government deficits, had arranged for David C. Mulford to go to Saudi
Arabia to act as an “investment adviser” to SAMA. His job was to “guide
the Saudi petrodollars investments to the correct banks, naturally in London
and New York. The Bilderberg scheme was operating just as planned.” [11]
Led by Exxon, some oil companies had created a short supply of domestic
crude oil, supported by Nixon on advice from his aids. By January 1974, oil
prices had increased by 400%. In December 1974, nine powerful bankers,
including David Rockefeller, approached New York mayor Abraham
Beame. They made him an offer he could not refuse – unless he assigned
management of the city’s vast pension funds to them – the Municipal
Assistance Corporation – then their complicit media cronies would
financially destroy the city. This decreased the amount of money available
for roadways, bridges, hospitals, schools and the laying-off of tens of
thousands of city workers in order for New York City, the biggest city in the
country, to service their bank debt. Similar circumstances occurred in other
parts of the world: bank collapses, grave trade deficits, unemployment,
inflation, and industrial and transportation depression in the more industrial
nations. In third-world countries, the consequences were even more severe.
[12]
While devastating to the populace, the oil companies flourished: Exxon,

Mobil, Texaco, Chevron, and Gulf. OPEC’s petrodollars were deposited into
the right banks in New York and London: Chase Manhattan, Citibank,
Manufacturers Hanover, Bank of America, Barclays, Lloyds and Midland
Bank. [13] These events set the stage for the debt crisis of the 1980s.
The globalist decision of August 1971 to remove the dollar from a fixed,
gold-backed exchange rate system generated a shift to double-digit inflation,
urban decay, mounting unemployment and excessive interest rates. The
Kissinger-orchestrated Middle East oil crisis of 1973-74 was designed to de-
industrialize and eventually transform the United States from the world’s
largest creditor nation to the world's biggest debtor nation.
A review of history further helps to reveal ruthless business patterns that

have shaped current circumstances – including yet another war resulting in
death and bloodshed for the benefit of the greedy, insatiable elite.
Beginning with the Civil War, the opportunistic, monopolistic John D.

Rockefeller sold inflated-priced Harkness whiskey to the Federal troops.
Recognizing the huge profitability in war with the right commodity, he built
his first oil refinery in 1863 along the Cuyahoga River (Ohio) to
accommodate the growing needs of the raging Civil War which he and
others, like J. P. Morgan, had purchased their way out of for $300.
The Rothschild controlled National City Bank of Cleveland gave
Rockefeller his first loan. In 1865 Rockefeller, for $72,500, bought out his
partners (Henry Flagler, Samuel Andrews, Stephen V. Harkness) and price-
chopped or otherwise destroyed his competitors by purchasing supporting
industries such as pipelines, railroad tank cars, terminal facilities and barrel
manufacturing factories. He soon incorporated the growing imperialistic
Standard Oil Company in 1870 to fully exploit the growing Russian
kerosene market as well as the curative “snake-oil” market in the U.S.
In what Ohio historian Christopher Eiben called “a brilliant stroke of

corporate back scratching,” “Rockefeller sold shares to bankers who lent
him millions and railroaders who gave him great freight deals, including
rebates on rivals' shipments.” [14] “Working through the Wall Street firms
of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and J. P. Morgan Co., the Rothschilds financed John
D. Rockefeller so that he could create the Standard Oil Empire. They also
financed the activities of Edward Harriman (railroads) and Andrew Carnegie
(steel).” [15]
By 1873 Standard Oil, by hook or crook, had acquired about 80 percent of

the refining capacity in Cleveland which was about one third of the U.S.
total. Interestingly enough, the stock market crashed on September 18, 1873
and created a six year recession allowing Standard Oil to seize refineries in
Pennsylvania's oil region, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and New York.
Rockefeller controlled approximately 90% of the oil refined as well as most
of the oil marketing facilities in the U.S. by 1878. [16] Ruthless Rockefeller,
who detested competition, founded the first global monopoly and was
supplying 90% of the world’s oil, 70% overseas. Great Britain also
experienced economic depression in 1873 replete with pandemic
unemployment and bankruptcies. Two years later, the Rothschilds provided
a sizeable loan (£4,080,000) to enable the British government to acquire a
controlling share of the Suez Canal. [17]
Rockefeller had built the world’s biggest business in Cleveland, Ohio.
Standard Oil sold over “300 refining byproducts” from Vaseline to chewing
gum. In 1882, he created the Standard Oil Trust, suggested by Samuel Dodd,
Standard Oil’s attorney, to eviscerate and devour all of the independent oil
producers and refiners both nationally (250 competitors in the U.S.) and
internationally. A trust is when stockholders in a group of companies
transfer their shares to a single set of trustees who control all of the
companies which constitutes a monopoly. “In exchange, the stockholders
received certificates entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated
earnings of the jointly managed companies.” [18] Rockefeller’s “trust”
became an example to other “businessmen” who embraced the “trust”
concept – always at the expense of the working man. Rockefeller took his
growing Goliath to Manhattan in 1883 where he “influenced urban sprawl.”
[19]
Russia’s oil industry accelerated in the latter part of the 19th century due to
an oil boom at the Caspian Sea town of Baku, which had opened in 1873 and
at Galicia (now in Poland). The Rothschild banking family had major
interests in the oil-wells of Baku, Russia. Beginning in 1875, Ludvig and
Robert Nobel built an oil empire known as the Brothers Nobel, or Branobel,
based on oil deposits in Baku on the Caspian Sea. [20] By 1883, Standard
Oil’s imports were not as essential to the Russian market for reasons that
follow. [21]
Britain’s Marcus Samuel, future founder of Shell Oil, developed tankers

capable of carrying oil in cost-cutting bulk transport through the Suez Canal.
The maiden voyage of the “Murex,” the first tanker, was in 1892.
Remember, Great Britain had a controlling interest in the Suez Canal, thanks
to the Rothschilds. Marcus and his brother also established bulk oil storage
at ports in the Far East. In addition, they contracted with a Russian group,
controlled by the Rothschilds, “for the long-term supply of kerosene” which
put them in high-risk direct competition, abhorrent to Rockefeller, with
Standard Oil. The Samuel brothers named their company The Tank
Syndicate but renamed it in 1897 to the Shell Transport and Trading
Company. [22]
Rockefeller and his accomplices felt that they were above the law until the
passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act on July 2, 1890, enacted by Congress
based on their Constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce. It was
signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison. In 1892, the Ohio Supreme
Court ordered the disbanding of the Standard Oil Trust, an illegal monopoly.
“Standard Oil was subsequently reorganized in 1899 as a holding company
under the name of Standard Oil Company of New Jersey. That state had
conveniently adopted a law that permitted a parent company to own the
stock of other companies.” [23]
In 1896 Standard Oil contributed $250,000 to Republican William

McKinley's presidential campaign against Democrat William Jennings
Bryan, a supporter of antitrust legislation. [24] McKinley was opposed to the
imperialistic, expansionist Spanish-American War. Yet, to retain office in
the next election, he asked Congress to declare war against Spain in 1898.
He signed the Gold Standard Act in 1900.
In September 1901, William McKinley, allegedly a Rockefeller tool, was

shot by Leon Czolgosz (son of Polish immigrants), labeled as an “anarchist”
although he didn’t belong to any rebel groups. Czolgosz was immediately
“tried and executed by the Establishment.” The assassination was
manipulated by the Establishment to subtly discredit rebellion and anyone
who might justifiably dissent. The Elite, in any age, would actually prefer to
prohibit dissent. It is similar to our current administration saying: “Let us
never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of
September the 11th…” [25] and by implication – let us never tolerate
conspiracy theorists.
Following the assassination, various anti-sedition and anti-conspiracy laws

were passed by the Establishment. Who benefited by McKinley’s death –
Teddy Roosevelt who was supported by the contending Morgan (as opposed
to Rockefeller) wing of the Republican Party. Roosevelt immediately started
using the anti-trust weapon to try to destroy Rockefeller's Standard Oil and
Harriman's Northern Securities, both bitter enemies of the Morgan world
empire. [26]
Woodrow Wilson, son of a Presbyterian minister, had the financial and

political support of the Rockefellers, Jacob Schiff, Bernard Baruch, and
others in his successful 1910 bid for governor of New Jersey. They also had
the love letters he wrote to Mary Peck, his mistress while he was president
of Princeton (1902-1910), for which they paid $65,000. [27] Therefore he
later made the perfect, morally compromised presidential candidate. The
following unconstitutional acts were engineered during the administration of
the obedient Rockefeller minion, Woodrow Wilson:
1913: The Sixteenth Amendment – authorized income taxes (never ratified)
The Seventeenth Amendment – direct popular election of Senators
Underwood Tariff – lowered duties
Federal Reserve Act – created the un-federal Federal Reserve System
Through the years, Standard Oil received bad press as a result of their
cutthroat business practices and the muckraking reports of people like Ida
Tarbell and writer/activist Upton Sinclair. Rockefeller hired Ivy Lee in 1914
as their public relations manager to clean up their image and appear
philanthropic. [28] A public relations professional, with media complicity,
also discredits or disgraces any national or foreign opponent.
For decades, voters merely decide to cast a vote – the actual decisions
regarding candidates and the orchestrated consequences of those calculated
choices are made in covert CFR committee meetings, Bilderberg assemblies,
pentagon offices and corporate boardrooms. Voters ultimately suffer the
extreme penalties and the elite benefactors, the “deciders” remain unscathed.
[1] Lindsey Williams - The Energy Non-Crisis - Part 1 of 8
Monsanto Buys ‘Terminator’ Seeds Company by F. William Engdahl, Global

[2]
Research, August 27, 2006
A Century of War, Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by William
[3]
Engdahl, pg. 267
[4] Ibid, pg. 130-141
[5] Ibid
[6] Ibid
[7] Ibid
[8] Ibid
[9] Ibid
Kissinger by Gary Allen, http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/homeland/kissinger/

[10]
Accessed July 27, 2007
[11]A Century of War, Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by
William Engdahl, pg. 130-141 See also The Hidden Hand of American Hegemony:
Petrodollar Recycling and International Markets
A Century of War, Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order by
[12]
William Engdahl, pg. 130-141
[13] Ibid
[14]The Energy Bulletin, Rockefeller and Co. turned oil into local gold by Grant Segall,
Published on 11 Jun 2005 by Cleveland Plain Dealer,
http://www.energybulletin.net/7374.html Accessed July 20, 2007
[15] Rothschild Fortune Built Rockefellers, Morgans, Etc
The Dismantling of The Standard Oil Trust, http://www.linfo.org/standardoil.html,

[16]
[17]N M Rothschild & Sons Limited, http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-
histories/N-M-Rothschild-amp;-Sons-Limited-Company-History.html Accessed July
23, 2007

[18]
[19]Rockefeller and Co. turned oil into local gold, June 12, 2005, By Grant Segall,
http://www.cleveland.com/energy/index.ssf?/energy/more/1.html Accessed July 23,
2007
[20]Alfred Nobel - St. Petersburg, 1842-1863 by Birgitta Lemmel,

http://nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/biographical/articles/russia/ Accessed July 23, 2007
[21]At The Dawn Of The Kerosene Era by Alexander Matveichuk PhD (History),
Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 2006,
http://www.oilru.com/or/26/464/ Accessed July 20, 2007
[22] Shell,
The beginnings, http://www.shell.com/home/content/aboutshell-
en/who_we_are/our_history/the_beginnings/the_beginnings_history_of_shell_22112006.
html Accessed July 26, 2007

[23]
[24]American Experience, The Rockefeller Timeline,

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/rockefellers/timeline/index.html Accessed July 24, 2007
[25] PresidentBush Speaks to United Nations, Remarks by the President, To United

Nations General Assembly, U.N. Headquarters, New York, New York, November 10,
2001, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011110-3.html Accessed
July 25, 2007
[26]Investigate the Vice President First by Murray N. Rothbard,

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard67.html Accessed July 25, 2007
[27] The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat
Riott, pg. 20
[28] JohnD. Rockefeller: A Photographic History by Kristin Aguilera and Keith E. Rolfe,
Photographs courtesy of the Rockefeller Archive Center,
http://www.financialhistory.org/MAGAZINE/photo-history.htm Accessed July 24, 2007
Comments?: deannaATspingola.com
also be included.

The New World Order by Conquest or Consent PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

The New World Order by Conquest or Consent PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

The New World Order, by Conquest or Consent?

Join Email List to receive notification of new Spingola articles

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the

Unfortunately, in the United States, the Establishment’s goal of a New

Consent, using mass population management can be achieved by using

Several current crises receiving media attention definitely demand serious

Crisis #1: Deliberate destabilization is occurring: well financed

Solution or synthesis: The completely orchestrated invasion by invitation is

Crisis #2: Members of the government-friendly mass media are apparently

Journalistic exposés about Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-California),

Solution or synthesis: Full ramifications of the legislation already in place

Obviously, there are other crises, orchestrated oppositions, for which

Is another war on the horizon? Should we preemptively nuke Iran – the

Warrantless domestic surveillance is an affront to our basic Constitutional

Certainly, there is a massive amount of contrived crises but I hope I made

To provide the ongoing application of these devilish dialectics individuals

President Kennedy said of Freemasonry: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is

“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is promoting

Both of these groups were established as proxies for the Rhodes-Milner

Back To Political Points

© Deanna Spingola 2006 - All rights reserved

The New World Order, the Secrets of Their Success

Join Email List to receive notification of new Spingola articles

The function of the Rhodes-Milner Group, now referred to as The Rhodes

• David Souter (Supreme Court Judge)

• R. James Woolsey (CFR) (ex-CIA Director 1993-1995)

• Alan Keith Henrikson (CFR) (The Fletcher Roundtable on a New

• Richard Jeffrey Danzig (former Under Secretary of the Navy)

• Wesley Kanne Clark (CFR) (Supreme Allied Commander, NATO,

• David Ruick Bock (16 years at the World Bank)

• David Carter Hardesty Jr. (West Virginia University’s 21st president)

• Stephen Alan Oxman (CFR) (Assistant Secretary of State for

• Dennis Cutler Blair (Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. Associate Director of

• David Odell Beim (CFR) (executive vice president of the Export-

• Walter Becker Slocombe (CFR) (Under Secretary of Defense for

• Willard Scott Thompson (CFR) (Director, U S Institute for Peace,

• W. Bowman Cutter (CFR) (chairman of the Global Information

• Walter Isaacson (President of the Aspen Institute, Managing Editor of

• Neil L. Rudenstine (CFR) (President of Harvard University,

• Robert B. Reich (American commentator and author, U.S. Secretary

• Boisfeuillet Jones, Jr. (Publisher and CEO of The Washington Post)

• Richard N. Haass (CFR) (President of the Council on Foreign

• E. J. Dionne (American journalist and Washington Post columnist)

• Paul Blustein (American author and journalist The Washington Post)

• Clark Kent Ervin (Inspector General of the U.S. Department of

• Ivan A. Getting (American weapons scientist and co-inventor of GPS

See the complete list.

“It is a fact that in Europe, membership in the Bilderberger group guarantees

In an attempt to emulate Christianity, reason postured as revelation and

The Illuminati studied the Enlightenment philosophers to battle against the

William Russell’s cousin Samuel established Russell and Company in 1823

The un-American chapter of a German Order was established at Yale on

The Rhodes Trust

Back To Political Points

© Deanna Spingola 2006 - All rights reserved

The New World Order, It’s Their Party!

Join Email List to receive notification of new Spingola articles

The Order of Skull and Bone’s methodology is a strict adherence to

Despite popular misconceptions, our government is supposed to be a

Of the three branches of government, only the legislative branch is

If Americans actually believe that we select and then elect candidates, we

Voters witness this contrived opposition in every national election. In the

Idealistically, individuals are elected to faithfully represent and proxy vote in