Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

The JournalJournal of Infectious

of Infectious Diseases Diseases Advance Access published January 21, 2016


MAJOR ARTICLE

Antibody Levels and Protection After Hepatitis B Vaccine:


Results of a 30-Year Follow-up Study and Response to a
Booster Dose
Michael G. Bruce,1 Dana Bruden,1 Debby Hurlburt,1 Carolyn Zanis,1 Gail Thompson,1 Lisa Rea,1 Michele Toomey,1 Lisa Townshend-Bulson,2 Karen Rudolph,1
Lisa Bulkow,1 Philip R. Spradling,3 Richard Baum,1 Thomas Hennessy,1 and Brian J. McMahon1,2
1
Arctic Investigations Program, Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and
2
Liver Disease and Hepatitis Program, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, and 3Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV/AIDS,
Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease, and Tuberculosis Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Background. The duration of protection in children and adults resulting from hepatitis B vaccination is unknown. In 1981, we
immunized a cohort of 1578 Alaska Native adults and children from 15 Alaska communities aged ≥6 months using 3 doses of plasma-
derived hepatitis B vaccine.
Methods. Persons were tested for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) levels 30 years after receiving the primary
series. Those with levels <10 mIU/mL received 1 booster dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine 2–4 weeks later and were then eval-
uated on the basis of anti-HBs measurements 30 days after the booster.

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


Results. Among 243 persons (56%) who responded to the original primary series but received no subsequent doses during the
30-year period, 125 (51%) had an anti-HBs level ≥10 mIU/mL. Among participants with anti-HBs levels <10 mIU/mL who were avail-
able for follow-up, 75 of 85 (88%) responded to a booster dose with an anti-HBs level ≥10 mIU/mL at 30 days. Initial anti-HBs level
after the primary series was correlated with higher anti-HBs levels at 30 years.
Conclusions. Based on anti-HBs level ≥10 mIU/mL at 30 years and an 88% booster dose response, we estimate that ≥90% of par-
ticipants had evidence of protection 30 years later. Booster doses are not needed.
Keywords. hepatitis B; immunogenicity; Alaska Native; plasma-derived vaccine; Alaska; US; cohort; 30 years; antibody;
anti-HBs.

Universal vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine has been very ef- [12, 14–16]. After 22 years, 60% had a protective level of anti-
fective at preventing infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) body to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs; ≥10 mIU/mL),
and at reducing the development of chronic infection in young and overall 93% seemed to be protected (had antibody and/or
children from perinatal or early childhood exposures to HBV responded to booster dose). In addition, no new acute or chron-
[1–6]. However, the duration of protection after vaccination of ic HBV infections were found at this time [12].
infants (immunized from birth), older children and adults (with In this study, conducted 30 years after primary vaccination
either plasma-derived or recombinant vaccine) is not well un- series, we recruited a subset of the original cohort with the fol-
derstood [7–11]. We previously demonstrated protection out lowing goals: (1) to determine the proportion of persons with
to 22 years among persons vaccinated as children or adults anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL, (2) to evaluate the immune re-
[12–14]. sponse to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine among those
After US licensure of the HBV vaccine in 1981, we immu- with anti-HBs <10 mIU/mL, and (3) to compare characteristics
nized a cohort of 1578 Alaska Native adults and children aged of persons with or without protective antibody levels.
≥6 months with 3 doses of the plasma-derived hepatitis B vac-
cine [15]. Persons <20 years of age received the 10-µg dose, METHODS
and adults (aged ≥20 years) received the 20-µg dose. We fol- Study Design
lowed this cohort yearly with HBV serologic testing for the first This study was performed in a long-term prospective cohort.
11 years and then 15 and 22 years after their first dose of vaccine
Participants
We enrolled participants from 12 of the original 15 communi-
Received 8 September 2015; accepted 27 October 2015.
Correspondence: M. G. Bruce, Arctic Investigations Program, Centers for Disease Control and
ties in the 1981 immunogenicity study with a documented re-
Prevention, 4055 Tudor Centre Dr, Anchorage, AK 99507 (zwa8@cdc.gov). sponse to the primary plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine series.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases® Persons in the 3 communities who did not participate did not
Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This
work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
differ from all others in terms of age, sex, and initial antibody
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv748 level after the primary series. Persons from these 12 communities

Protection 30 Years After Hepatitis B Vaccine • JID • 1


who had moved to the city of Anchorage or Bethel, the largest log-transformed to calculate GMCs, and values <1.0 mIU/mL
town in the region, were also invited to participate. Persons were assigned a value of 1.0 before transformation. The anti-
who had received an additional dose of vaccine in the interven- HBs level 1 month after the HBV booster dose was compared
ing years (except study participants who were received a booster with the level 6 months after the primary HBV vaccine series,
dose at 22 years as part of the study) were excluded. using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Multivariate models were
Communities are remote, and study personnel flew to each of developed for protective anti-HBs level and response to the
them for 1–2 days of recruiting in the fall of 2011. Participants HBV booster dose using logistic regression. Variables with a
were notified in advance by letters and phone calls of the date univariate P value <.25 were considered in the multivariate
the study team would be present in their community. Persons model. In addition, after selection of all main effects, all 2-
out of the community or unavailable on the recruitment day way interactions were evaluated for statistical significance. All
were missed. For the 22-year study (in which booster doses statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version
were administered to persons with anti-HBs level <10 mIU/ 9.3; SAS). All P values are 2-sided and are exact when sample
mL) [12] we purposely recruited only 7 of the 15 original com- sizes necessitated.
munities in order to leave 8 communities “naive” for future im-
munogenicity studies. Among the study participants at 30 years, Informed Consent
we had 3 main groups: group 1 comprised persons who did not The present study was approved by the Alaska Area Institu-
participate in the 22-year study and therefore had no blood tional Review Board, the Centers for Disease Control and Pre-
drawn at that time; group 2, persons who did not receive a vention (CDC) Institutional Review Board, and 4 Alaska Native
tribal health boards, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corpora-

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


booster dose at 22 years (because their 22-year anti-HBs level
was ≥10 mIU/mL); and group 3, persons (with anti-HBs level tion, the Norton Sound Health Corporation, the Alaska Native
<10 mIU/mL) who received a booster dose of vaccine at 22 years. Tribal Health Consortium, and the Southcentral Foundation.
All participants provided written, informed consent.
Laboratory Testing
Serologic specimens from participants were tested at the Arctic RESULTS
Investigations Program Laboratory for antibody to hepatitis B
Study Cohort
surface antigen (ETI-AB-AUK Plus; DiaSorin) and antibody to
Of 1111 persons available in 15 communities, we chose to re-
hepatitis B core antigen (Ortho HBc ELISA; Ortho Diagnos-
cruit from 12 of those communities (8 that did not participate at
tics), as described elsewhere [12]. A linear standard curve rang-
22 years and 4 of the largest communities that had participated
ing from 5 to 160 mIU/mL was generated with each test run
in the 22-year follow-up). Among the 783 eligible participants,
using the immunoglobulin G anti-HBs standard set (ABAU-
435 (56%) were recruited (Figure 1). From the 12 communities,
STD-SET; DiaSorin). The lower limit of detection for the
there were 342 participants, plus 23 persons who had moved from
anti-HBs assay was defined as ≥2 mIU/mL. Persons found to be
one of these communities to Bethel and 70 who had moved to
positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen were referred
Anchorage. The following reasons/categories were given for not
to the Alaska Native Medical Center for further testing for hep-
participating in the study: the person refused, had moved from
atitis B surface antigen with enzyme immunoassay and for HBV
the village, did not show up, was lost to follow-up, or was not in
DNA with the Roche Amplicor Assay.
community the day of the study.
An anti-HBs level ≥10 mIU/mL was considered protective.
Study participants and eligible nonparticipants were similar
Study participants with anti-HBs levels <10 mIU/mL were of-
with regard to sex, age, and anti-HBs level after the primary vac-
fered an intramuscular booster dose of 10 μg of hepatitis B vac-
cination series (data not shown). Among the 435 study partic-
cine (Recombivax HB; Merck) given to assess immune response
ipants, groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, comprised 243 persons
to an antigenic challenge. We attempted to determine the con-
who did not participate in the 22-year study and therefore had no
centration of anti-HBs 30 days after the boost (median interval
blood drawn at that time, 129 who did not receive a booster vac-
between booster and follow-up blood collection, 33 days). A
cine dose at 22 years (owing to anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL),
positive booster dose response was defined as anti-HBs levels
and 63 who received a booster dose at 22 years (owing to anti-
≥10 mIU/mL at 30 days after the boost.
HBs levels <10 mIU/mL). Because group 3 had already received
Statistical Analysis a booster dose and group 2 did not receive a booster dose (anti-
We analyzed the proportion of persons with protective anti-HBs HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) at the 22-year follow-up, a detailed descrip-
level using the likelihood ratio χ2 test for categorical variables. Age tion of and analysis of anti-HBs levels at 30 years is restricted to
was analyzed as a categorical variable. The Cochran–Armitage group 1. Response to a booster dose focuses mainly on group 1
trend test was used to analyze the anti-HBs levels after the HBV but also includes some data on booster dose response for group
primary series. Quantitative anti-HBs levels were also presented 2. For group 3, we present only data on immunogenicity 8 years
as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs). These levels were after the booster dose.

2 • JID • Bruce et al
Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016
Figure 1. Participant flow chart in a 30-year follow-up study of 1578 persons receiving 3 doses of plasma-derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in Alaska in 1981.
Abbreviation: anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen.

Anti-HBs Levels 85 (66%) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL, and the GMC of anti-
Overall, among the 435 study participants, 219 (50%) had anti- HBs was 24.6 mIU/mL. Among the 63 study participants in group
HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL; the GMC of anti-HBs was 13.8 mIU/ 3, only 9 (14%) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL 8 years after
mL. GMCs by group during the 30-year period (Figure 2) high- their booster dose, and the GMC of anti-HBs was 3.6 mIU/mL.
light the fact that group 3 has had consistently lower GMCs than Analysis of data from group 1 by multivariate logistic regres-
group 1, and group 2 consistently higher GMCs. Antibody levels sion demonstrated that initial anti-HBs level and age at primary
at 30 years by sex, age, and anti-HBs level at study enrollment are vaccination were associated with anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL at
shown for group 1 (Table 1). Among the 243 group 1 participants, 30 years. Persons aged 5–19 years at the time of primary vacci-
125 (51%) had anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL, and the GMC of nation (aged 35–49 years at 30-year follow-up) had higher GMCs
anti-HBs was 14.4 mIU/mL. Among the 129 group 2 participants, and a higher proportion of protective antibodies than study

Protection 30 Years After Hepatitis B Vaccine • JID • 3


participants in other age groups. No association was found be-
tween the proportion of persons with protective antibody levels
at 30 years and body mass index, smoking, a history of cancer, or
presence of a (self-reported) HBV carrier in the household.

Response to Booster Dose


Because study participants in group 3 received a booster vaccine
dose 8 years earlier (22 years after the original vaccine series),
they did not receive a booster dose at 30 years. Study partici-
pants in groups 1 and 2 with anti-HBs levels <10 mIU/mL re-
ceived booster doses; however, because group 2 participants had
anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL at 22 years, we chose to focus on
Figure 2. Levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) decline group 1 for booster dose response. In group 1, among 118 eli-
over 30 years among 3 groups in Alaska. Group 1 comprised persons who responded gible participants, 96 (81%) who had anti-HBs levels <10 mIU/
to the primary hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine series and had not received any sub- mL received a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine. The median
sequent doses; group 2, persons not given a booster dose at a 22-year follow-up
(owing to anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL); and group 3, persons given a booster age of the 85 persons from whom serum was obtained after the
dose at 22 years (owing to anti-HBs levels <10 mIU/mL). Abbreviation: GMC, geo- booster dose was 40 years; 47 (55%) were male. Among these 85
metric mean concentration. persons tested 30 days after the booster dose, 75 (88%)

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


Table 1. Level of Anti-HBs 30 Years After Hepatitis B Vaccination, by Sex, Age, and Postvaccination Anti-HBs Level After Primary Series in Persons Who
Responded to the Primary Series and Had Not Received Subsequent Doses (Group 1)—Alaska, 2011–2012

Anti-HBs, Anti-HBs ≥10 Multivariate


Characteristic Persons, No.a GMC, mIU/mL mIU/mL, % (No.) P Value P Value

Sex
Female 117 14.1 52 (61) .83 . . .
Male 126 14.7 51 (64)
Age at 30-y follow-up (age at primary vaccination), y
<35 (<5) 59 6.8 32 (19) <.001 .002
35 to <40 (5 to <10) 49 24.9 61 (30)
40 to <50 (10 to <20) 90 22.8 64 (58)
≥50 (≥20) 45 8.5 40 (18)
Anti-HBs level after primary series, mIU/mL
10 to <100 20 3.4 20 (4) <.001 <.001
100 to <1000 95 5.8 34 (32)
1000 to <5000 78 15.0 58 (45)
≥5000 50 136.9 88 (44)
BMI, kg/m2
<25 68 13.1 53 (36) .98 . . .
25 to <30 69 17.6 52 (36)
≥30 101 14.1 51 (52)
Ever smoked tobacco
Yes 168 14.1 51 (85) .48 . . .
No 72 16.6 56 (40)
Ever chewed tobacco
Yes 147 14.3 52 (76) .81 . . .
No 90 16.4 53 (48)
History of cancer
Yes 10 39.7 60 (6) .63 . . .
No 224 14.7 52 (117)
Self-reported HBV carrier in household
Yes 7 9.0 57 (4) >.99 . . .
No 178 15.3 52 (93)

Abbreviations: Anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen; BMI, body mass index; GMC, geometric mean concentration; HBV, hepatitis B virus.
a
No persons had received a transplant, 3 had received immune-modulating medications, 6 had diabetes, 102 currently chewed tobacco, and 93 currently smoked.

4 • JID • Bruce et al
responded with anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL; the GMC was mIU/mL). Among the remaining 118 persons with anti-HBs
150.4 mIU/mL (Table 2). levels <10 mIU/mL, 75 of 85 available participants (88%) who
In the multivariate model, we determined that response to a received a booster dose responded with anti-HBs levels ≥10
booster dose was associated with the prebooster anti-HBs level; mIU/mL. Applying the 88% response rate to booster dose to
participants with preboost anti-HBs levels of 2–9.9 mIU/mL the larger group of 118 persons, 94% of primary responders
had a higher probability of achieving a response to booster had evidence of protective antibodies (anti-HBs levels ≥10
dose than those with anti-HBs levels <2 mIU/mL (P = .01; mIU/mL) or humoral immune memory defined by response
Table 2). No association was found between the proportion of to a booster dose. No new breakthrough infections were seen;
persons with anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL after the booster however, 2 persons who had previously been identified as pos-
dose and age at primary vaccination, anti-HBs level after pri- itive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen remained so at 30
mary series, body mass index, smoking, or use of chewing to- years; HBV DNA was not detected.
bacco. In group 2, among the 36 persons tested 30 days after
DISCUSSION
the booster dose, 33 (92%) responded with anti-HBs levels
≥10 mIU/mL; the GMC was 419.8 mIU/mL. This study, which follows Alaska Native persons who had re-
Among the 243 group 1 participants, 125 (51%; 95% confi- ceived plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine (at >6 months of
dence interval, 47%–55%) had evidence of long-term protection age) and who responded to the primary vaccine series at that
from hepatitis B vaccination (defined by anti-HBs levels ≥10 time, is the longest cohort study on long-term protection after

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


Table 2. Level of Anti-HBs After Hepatitis B Vaccine Booster Dose in Persons Who Responded to the Primary Series, Had Not Received Subsequent Doses,
and Had a 30-Year Anti-HBs Level <10 mIU/mL—Alaska, 2011–2012 (Group 1)

Anti-HBs, Anti-HBs ≥10 Multivariate


Characteristic Persons, No. GMC, mIU/mL mIU/mL, % (No.) P Value P Value

Sex
Female 38 266.2 87 (33) .75 . . .
Male 47 95.1 89 (42)
Age at 30-y follow-up (age at primary vaccination), y
<35 (<5) 30 98.2 83 (25) .77 . . .
35 to <40 (5 to <10) 17 134.2 94 (16)
40 to <50 (10 to <20) 19 275.7 89 (17)
≥50 (≥20) 19 179.4 89 (17)
Anti-HBs level after primary series, mIU/mL
10 to <100 9 33.7 89 (8) .08 . . .
100 to <1000 46 78.9 83 (38)
1000 to <5000 24 587.7 100 (24)
≥5000 6 876.3 83 (5)
BMI, kg/m2
<25 23 120.7 87 (20) .84 . . .
25 to <30 23 185.6 87 (20)
≥30 36 132.2 89 (32)
Ever smoked tobacco
Yes 61 128.4 87 (53) .72 . . .
No 22 218.9 91 (20)
Currently smokes tobacco
Yes 34 129.5 88 (30) >.99 . . .
No 49 162.1 88 (43)
Ever chewed tobacco
Yes 50 167.8 90 (45) .49 . . .
No 31 117.0 84 (26)
Currently chews tobacco
Yes 39 153.4 87 (34) >.99 . . .
No 46 148.3 89 (41)
Preboost anti-HBs level, mIU/mL
<2 39 40.1 82 (32) .04 .04
2–4 30 222.0 90 (27)
5–9.9 16 1837.4 100 (16)

Abbreviations: Anti-HBs, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen; BMI, body mass index; GMC, geometric mean concentration.

Protection 30 Years After Hepatitis B Vaccine • JID • 5


hepatitis B vaccination to date in the world. It shows that pro- Limitations of this study include receipt of plasma-derived
tection from the vaccine continues out to 30 years; ≥94% of per- vaccine for the participant’s primary series because the recom-
sons had evidence of protection (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL or binant vaccine currently in use was not available until the late
response to booster dose of vaccine). No chronic infections 1980s. However, studies have shown that antibody response and
were documented. In group 1, initial anti-HBs levels after the the effectiveness of the plasma-derived vaccine in Alaska and in
primary series and age at primary vaccination were correlated other populations is similar to results in studies using the re-
with higher anti-HBs levels at 30 years. combinant vaccine [7, 25]. Thus, we believe our findings
Data from this study showing protection from infection with apply to persons who received either type of vaccine. Another
HBV 30 years after vaccine administration are similar to findings limitation is that the lower limit of detection for the anti-HBs
from other long-term cohort studies with 20–25 years of follow- assay is not clear; we chose to define it as ≥2 mIU/mL.
up in Taiwan [17], Thailand [18], the Gambia [19], and elsewhere Our study did not include persons vaccinated at birth,
[20, 21]. These studies all included infants, but our original Alaska in whom anti-HBs levels are known to fall faster than in those
cohort comprised children and adults and did not include infants, immunized starting at >6 months of age [9]. Although this
who do not respond to boosting as readily as young children [8, study gives ample evidence that humoral immunity persists for
22]. A higher proportion of persons aged 5–19 years when they ≥30 years, studies to determine the status of cellular mediated
received their primary vaccine series had protective antibody lev- immunity would be complementary and important, especially
els (anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) 30 years later compared with those in those who lose anti-HBs and fail to respond to a booster dose.
aged <5 or >20 years at primary vaccination. Our study findings In conclusion, we believe that the results of our findings are

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


suggest that children vaccinated through catch-up programs or applicable to children, adolescents, and adults vaccinated dur-
young adults vaccinated for occupational safety reasons have a ing hepatitis B catch-up programs and to healthcare workers
high likelihood of being protected for multiple decades. vaccinated with either vaccine. Hepatitis booster doses are not
Among participants in groups 1 and 2 with an anti-HBs level currently needed for these groups at 30 years out from primary
<10 mIU/mL at 30 years, those with a higher preboost anti-HBs vaccine series. We plan to follow the antibody and booster re-
level were more likely to demonstrate a booster response (anti- sponse of this unique cohort at 35 years and will also look at
HBs ≥10 mIU/mL) than those with lower preboost anti-HBs cell-mediated immune response among participants.
levels. This suggests that even if the anti-HBs level at 30 years
has waned to <10 mIU/mL, the closer the level is to 10 mIU/ Notes
Acknowledgments. We thank the Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corpora-
mL, the higher the probability that the boost will succeed.
tion and the Norton Sound Health Corporation for their participation. We
No previous studies, to our knowledge, have defined what con- also thank the many community health aides in the study villages and the
stitutes an appropriate booster response in a person who has re- nurses at the Arctic Investigations Program and the Alaska Native Medical
ceived the hepatitis B vaccine series in the distant past and whose Center, who over the years gave their valuable time to the study.
Disclaimer. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the
levels of anti-HBs later fell below the protective level. Although the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the Centers
magnitude of antibody response after a single booster dose is not for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
very vigorous, in our study approximately 90% of persons in Financial support. This work is supported by in-kind personnel sup-
port and from a cooperative agreement (U50/CCU022279) between the
groups 1 and 2 who received a booster dose responded with levels CDC and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium.
of anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL. The study done by Szmuness et al [23] Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All
in 1980 demonstrated that only 31.4% of persons (naive to this authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Con-
flicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content
antigen) who were vaccinated with 1 dose of hepatitis B vaccine
of the manuscript have been disclosed.
acquired antibody levels >10 radioimmunoassay units (shown to
be equivalent to 10 mIU/mL) [16]. Our data provide strong evi- References
dence that the immune system of most persons 30 years after the 1. Harpaz R, McMahon BJ, Margolis HS, et al. Elimination of new chronic hepatitis
B virus infections: results of the Alaska immunization program. J Infect Dis 2000;
initial vaccination series continue to recognize this antigen. 181:413–8.
The findings from our study also probably pertain to the 2. McMahon B. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Med Clin North Am 2014;
98:39–54.
long-term protection afforded by this vaccine in healthcare
3. Gilca V, De Serres G, Boulianne N, et al. Antibody persistence and the effect of a
workers, who are at a particularly high risk of exposure to booster dose given 5, 10 or 15 years after vaccinating preadolescents with a recom-
and acquisition of HBV if sufficient immunity is not present binant hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine 2013; 31:448–51.
4. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Khangura J, Zakher B. Screening for hep-
[24]. The cost of periodic screening of healthcare workers for atitis B virus infection in adolescents and adults: a systematic review to update the
anti-HBs and boosting those whose levels are low or absent U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2014;
161:31–45.
would be prohibitive. Our study provides strong evidence to 5. FitzSimons D, McMahon B, Hendrickx G, Vorsters A, Van Damme P. Burden and
support the CDC recommendation that protection, after a com- prevention of viral hepatitis in the Arctic region, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22–23
March 2012. Int J Circumpolar Health 2013; 72.
plete series of hepatitis B vaccine and documentation of the ini- 6. Lok ASF, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology 2009;
tial response, will last for ≥30 years [24]. 50:661–2.

6 • JID • Bruce et al
7. Keck J, Bulkow L, Raczniak G, et al. Hepatitis B virus antibody levels 7 to 9 years 17. Ni YH, Chang MH, Wu JF, Hsu HY, Chen DS. Minimization of hepatitis B infec-
after booster vaccination in Alaska native persons. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; tion by a 25-year universal vaccination program. J Hepatol 2012; 57:730–5.
21:1339–42. 18. Poovorawan Y, Chongsrisawat V, Theamboonlers A, Leroux Roels G, Crasta P,
8. Dentinger C, McMahon B, Butler J, et al. Persistence of antibody to hepatitis B and Hardt K. Persistence and immune memory to hepatitis B vaccine 20 years after
protection from disease among Alaska natives immunized at birth. Pediat Infect primary vaccination of Thai infants, born to HBsAg and HBeAg positive mothers.
Dis J 2005; 24:786–92. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2012; 8:896–904.
9. Hammitt L, Hennessy T, Fiore A, et al. Hepatitis B immunity in children vaccinat- 19. Mendy M, Peterson I, Hossin S, et al. Observational study of vaccine efficacy 24
ed with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine beginning at birth: a follow-up study at 15 years after the start of hepatitis B vaccination in two Gambian villages: no need for
years. Vaccine 2007; 25:6958–64. a booster dose. PLoS One 2013; 8:e58029.
10. Gold Y, Somech R, Mandel D, Peled Y, Reif S. Decreased immune response to hep- 20. Coppola N, Corvino AR, De Pascalis S, et al. The long-term immunogenicity of
atitis B eight years after routine vaccination in Israel. Acta Paediatr 2003; recombinant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine: contribution of universal HBV vac-
92:1158–62. cination in Italy. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:149.
11. Zanetti AR, Mariano A, Romanò L, et al. Long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis 21. Wang F, Shen L, Cui F, et al. The long-term efficacy, 13–23 years, of a plasma-de-
B vaccination and policy for booster: an Italian multicentre study. Lancet (London, rived hepatitis B vaccine in highly endemic areas in China. Vaccine 2015;
England) 2005; 366:1379–84. 33:2704–9.
12. McMahon B, Dentinger C, Bruden D, et al. Antibody levels and protection after 22. Williams I, Goldstein S, Tufa J, Tauillii S, Margolis H, Mahoney F. Long term an-
hepatitis B vaccine: results of a 22-year follow-up study and response to a booster tibody response to hepatitis B vaccination beginning at birth and to subsequent
dose. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:1390–6. booster vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22:157–63.
13. McMahon BJ, Schoenberg S, Bulkow L, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B viral 23. Szmuness W, Stevens CE, Harley EJ, et al. Hepatitis B vaccine: demonstration of
markers in 52,000 Alaska Natives. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138:544–9. efficacy in a controlled clinical trial in a high-risk population in the United States.
14. McMahon B, Bruden D, Petersen K, et al. Antibody levels and protection after N Engl J Med 1980; 303:833–41.
hepatitis B vaccination: results of a 15-year follow-up. Ann Intern Med 2005; 24. Schillie S, Murphy TV, Sawyer M, et al. CDC guidance for evaluating health-care
142:333–41. personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for administering postexposure
15. Heyward WL, Bender TR, McMahon BJ, et al. The control of hepatitis B virus in- management. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1–19.
fection with vaccine in Yupik Eskimos: demonstration of safety, immunogenicity, 25. Mast EE, Margolis HS, Fiore AE, et al. A comprehensive immunization strategy to
and efficacy under field conditions. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:914–23. eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recom-

Downloaded from http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 19, 2016


16. Wainwright RB, Bulkow LR, Parkinson AJ, Zanis C, McMahon BJ. Protection pro- mendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) part 1:
vided by hepatitis B vaccine in a Yupik Eskimo population—results of a 10-year immunization of infants, children, and adolescents. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Re-
study. J Infect Dis 1997; 175:674–7. comm Rep 2005; 54:1–31.

Protection 30 Years After Hepatitis B Vaccine • JID • 7

Вам также может понравиться