Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Erwida Maulia , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta | Thu, 11/26/2009 9:36 AM | Headlines
National Education Minister Muhammad Nuh says the government will seek for a case review
against a ruling by the Supreme Court, which requires that the government revoke the
controversial national final exam.
The Supreme Court delivered its verdict on Sept. 14, 2009, in favor of a civilian lawsuit, but the
verdict was only made public on Tuesday.
“We have to respect the decision, but also want others to respect our right to seek legal efforts to
defend our cause,” Nuh was quoted as saying by kompas.com.
Head of the National Education Standard Agency (BNSP), Mungin Eddy Wibowo, said in
Semarang that the government would keep organizing the final exam in 2010 despite the court’s
ruling, Antara reported.
“There has been prevalent fraud in the implementation of the national exam, but we conduct
evaluations and improvements every year.”
Echoing the views of advocates of the national exams, Mungin said the results of the exams, as
long as they were organized “objectively, transparently and accountably”, are still needed to
measure the quality of education and to determine students’ eligibility to graduate and continue
their studies at university.
Those against the national exam cite the disparities educations across the country, arguing instead
for local level exams.
The lawsuit against the national exam was filed last year by the Advocacy Team for National
Exam Victims and the Education Forum.
The Central Jakarta District Court said in its verdict issued on May 21, 2007, that the government
had failed to protect the rights of citizens who were deprived of a chance to pursue education at a
higher level because they did not pass the government-sanctioned national final exam.
The government’s appeal at the Jakarta High Court was rejected. The provincial court upheld the
lower court’s decision on Dec. 6, 2007.
On Friday, the Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) reported 142 graft cases, which allegedly took
place at various institutions within the national education sector between 2004 and 2008, to the
KPK for further monitoring and investigation.
“We want the [Corruption Eradication Commission] to monitor graft cases being tried at district
courts and the legal processing of many cases that has remained stagnant, and also to investigate
many cases in regions that have gained little attention from the general public,” ICW researcher
Febri Hendri said after handing over a report on the 142 cases to the commission.
The cases were worth a total of Rp 243 billion and implicated 287 individuals, mostly public
officials and school principals, Febri said. He cited numerous forms of graft in the sector such as
the imposition of illegal fees, school construction projects markups, bribes to teachers and school
principals.
Febri also urged the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and students’ parents to play
more active roles in fighting increasing corruption in the education sector, in line with the recent
increases to education spending.
Education is a large and important sector that the general public should monitor, he said, adding
that the education sector had become a fertile ground for corruption since it was allocated a larger
budget by the state government.
“Power abuses have been rampant not only at the National Education Ministry but also in
provincial and regency/municipal administrations under regional autonomy,” Febri said.
Numerous power abuses and graft cases had remained unexposed because law enforcers and
relevant stake holders had not paid enough attention to the sector, Febri said.
Separately Lody Paat, the coordinator of the Education Coalition, said the KPK could help reduce
corruption by putting corruptors behind bars.
However, only transparent processes in designing budgets and keeping accounts open to
inspections by students’ parents could really prevent power abuses and red tape in the sector, Lody
said.
“I believe parents, teachers, principals, and other stakeholders must make budget plans together
for schools and supervise implementation. They should be able to take part in educational budget
planning from national to local levels,” he said.
The coalition had carried out several pilot projects in Garut and Tangerang to teach parents how to
make and scrutinize schools’ budgets and accounts, Lody said.
Since 2003, the National Education Ministry has proclaimed school-based management that
theoretically allows anyone to acquire schools’ budget reports, Febri said. “But, if you try to get
these reports, many schools will not hand over this information,” he said.
Under school-based management, school committees, which include students’ parents and school
staff, should plan for and scrutinize schools’ budget spending.
However, in most cases committees had not managed their education budgets effectively since
most parents did not know how to scrutinize schools’ budget reports, said Jumono from the
Students’ Parents Alliance for Education. (mrs)
Friday, November 27, 2009 7:38 PM
The ministry has granted Internet access to 18,000 schools since the program was launched in
2006.
Mendiknas: Tak Ada Kata yang Melarang Pemerintah Gelar UN
Priyombodo/KOMPAS
Artikel Terkait:
Demikian hal tersebut juga diupayakan jika memang ada jalur hukum lain setelah kasasi ditolak.
Mendiknas mengatakan, menurut para ahli hukum, masih ada upaya lain dalam bentuk PK
(peninjauan kembali).
Persoalannya, jelas Nuh, sampai saat ini Depdiknas belum menerima putusan kasasi tersebut.
Memang, lanjut Mendiknas, bunyi putusan tersebut ada di website MK yang menjelaskan kasasi
pemerintah berkaitan dengan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat atas penyelenggaraan UN.
Nuh menjelaskan, ia mencoba memahami putusan kasasi yang dikeluarkan MA sehubungan
dengan keputusan pengadilan tinggi pada 3 Mei 2007 lalu itu.
Ada enam poin, lanjut Nuh, dan tiga di antaranya yang mungkin dimaknai dengan; pemerintah
tidak boleh melaksanakan UN. “Kalau melihat keputusan itu, tidak ada satu kata pun yang
menyatakan tentang dilarangnya pemerintah melakukan UN,” kata Mendiknas di Jakarta, Kamis
(26/11).
Yang ada, tambah Mendiknas, sambil membagikan salinan keputusan pengadilan tinggi kepada
para wartawan, dalam bentuk memerintahkan kepada para tergugat (baca:pemerintah) untuk
meningkatkan kualitas guru, kelengkapan sarana dan prasarana sekolah, akses informasi yang
lengkap di seluruh daerah di Indonesia, sebelum mengeluarkan kebijakan Pelaksanaan Ujian
Nasional lebih lanjut; memerintahkan kepada para tergugat untuk mengambil langkah-langkah
konkrit untuk mengatasi gangguan psikologi dan mental peserta didik dalam usia anak akibat
penyelenggaraan UN; memerintahkan kepada para tergugat untuk meninjau kembali Sistem
Pendidikan Nasional.
Terkait dengan perintah tersebut, Nuh menjelaskan, Depdiknas telah melakukan perbaikan-
perbaikan dalam hal meningkatkan kualitas guru, kelengkapan sarana dan prasarana sekolah, akses
informasi yang lengkap di seluruh daerah di Indonesia.
“Pada program seratus hari Depdiknas jelas terlihat upaya-upaya itu sedang dilakukan, misalnya
menyambungkan internet ke 17.500 sekolah,” katanya.